Well, as I see it, development is always, basically a moral thing. Take things from the past. When Henry David Thoreau developed the civil rights movement, with its civil disobedience credo, he did it because the slavestate the southern US was, was wrong.
When Mahatma Ghandi liberated India, he did it, because the colonisation was wrong.
Ethically, morally wrong.
But the fact of the matter is, that in their time, they were not seen as morally right, on the contrary, they were seen as wrong. Thoreau were imprisoned, Ghandi was expelled from the lawyers community.
Today, the writing on the wall is truly different. What is wrong today is not what was wrong seventy years ago. Today the victims are the former slave owners.
Brits living on the fair isles of Brittania, having their daughters raped. Danes who see their wealthfarestate disappear. Sweden that is a living hell.
These are the new victims. It is therefor morally right to defend them.
The Pim fortuyns and the Ayan Hirsi Ali, and me, are the Mahatma Ghandis and David Thorueas of this age.
If you cannot see that, then you are not capable of moral sentiment.
G-d bless the willingness to be honest, and see the world as it is.
