Ok, so these are my thoughts concerning the attack on the UN post.

First of all; I get it. The UN is supposed to bring peace, have a fair understanding of both sides, build bridges and really work for peace.

It has not, it has taken the side of Hamas from the beginning, going back many, many years.

So, by all means, it is an enemy of the state of Israel.

Yet, does it MAKE SENSE to physically attack an outpost?

Here are my thoughts on that issue.

We have just had Yom Kippur and happy new year.

So this time is a time for reflection, forgiving, putting up new goals and so on.

We are rebels, heirs to a loooooong line of rebels and we are, honestly, very good at being rebels.

One of the arch rebels of mankind’s history, it the philosopher Socrates, who went about asking questions, and ultimately was forced to commit suicide.

Socrates had a pupil called Plato, who are the first man of science. Most of the ideas we have in science today is something Plato figured out. As such Plato MADE science.

What is the difference between Plato and Socrates? Plato did a lot of hiding all his criticism of the society. He was also a pupil of Pythagoras, who had all the methods of the mystery schools of Egypt at hand, and was a master of secrecy.

So in a sense you could say, that Plato is a mix between Pythagoras and Socrates. He is a rebel, yet a rebel with a pinch for secrecy and hiding a lot of his ideas.

That is why Plato succeeded.

Now attacking the UN physically, is that a Pythagorean or Socratic thing to do?

It is a Socratic thing to do; open exposure of a corrupted organization. What is the end result of that, it is that we are forced to commit suicide.

My point is; we have to walk that balance between secrecy and an open rebellion.

We could have exposed the UN in other ways than a direct attack.

G-d bless the will to walk the fine line between open rebellion and secret exposure and academics. (Academus was the hero in the glade that Plato taught in, thereby the name academics).