When I think about physics, hands down, I am not a physicist.

I happen to live in a country that gave birth to some of the best physicist of the world. Ørsted, Niels Bohr, all the way back to Tycho Brahe, who invented precision in physics.

So this has been with me the whole time, I have worked with metaphysics. These guys are amazing.

So, I have not endeavored into physics really, due to the fact, that I do not really feel, that I have the right to do it. Physicist like Niels Bohr and Holger Bech Nielsen are truly geniuses of their time.

But something really stuck with me, when I conversed with mr. Holger Bech Nielsen regarding the birth of our universe.

Holger is one of the fathers of the Big Bang theory, and I respect that. But coming from the side, meta means at the side of. Meta-physics, from the side of physics.

It has really bugged me, that some of the basic powers of nature does not add up with the Big Bang theory. There are, as I see it, essentially two major powers of nature working in the universe. The power of centrifugal power, and the power of gravity.

These two powers seem to work to together to create our universe.

A planet for instance, keeps its form and movement through centrifugal power. So centrifugal power makes the world habitable by making a shape that can house life.

Gravity, that is the attraction of elements through void, keeps things together. The reason why we have an atmosphere, is because gravity attracts the air to the surface of the earth. The same with water. The reason we have water in the surface is because gravity pulls it back on earth. If we had no gravity, water molecules and atoms would just disperse into space.

This goes for stars (suns) as well. Why do we have shining ROUND objects all over the known space? It is because centrifugal power, by friction, causes the light particles to beam of the powerhouse of centrifugal power.

That is why we have these massive light creators. Just imagine the power behind these suns.

Anyway this is the logical consequence of the ideas of Anaxagoras. I am not saying that I am a physicist, but Anaxagoras was a physicist, he inventer nuclear physics. So on his authority, these ideas may have some merit.

Again, this is just me dipping my toes into physics, I am not really a physicist myself.

But, these ideas could perhaps be used by the physical community, even though Holger may not agree. But I get it, he is somewhere else, and he is really an amazing person. This is not a criticism.

G-d bless the will to further the understanding of our universe. G-d bless the will to see further into the stars.