The American Revolution, that I envisioned has come pretty far. USA is the one country in the Western world that is actually fixing its own problems, be it economically, in terms of faith, system and military.

That will bring great progress when all these things hit home in a few years. Already we can see that the supertanker is turning around, and the economical problems are much less severe.

In ten years, we will have beaten the other competitors due to economical progress, industrial revolution 2.0, a well working society and a much needed force for good.

The progress I have aimed at, is slow and organic growth. I am sure you can use your money to buy this and that. But at the end of the day, it is your own qualities that will sustain your stability.

If you compare the US to Rome, what really went bad in the Roman Empire, was the fact, that the core, that of the Etruscan ideas, was left for all kind of other ideas.

You need to have a core to survive as an empire.

That is the true aim right now, the America First is, as I see it, a call for the strengthening of the core of the US. That of Democracy, family, civil rights, humanism, a positive spirituality, community.

These things that is at the core of Americanism.

It is about faith, rebuilding the faith in that vast and amazing country of abundance.

That will take a while, but rooting out corruption and fixing the administration is off cause a part of that cure of the state.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Mr. Trump is waging a war against the darkness that prevail in the US. According to most sources, the darkness he is fighting is terrible. What I hear is things a pedophilia, satanism, and abuse in general.

That is perfect, that is what I have always fought against, and am still fighting here in Denmark.

But, you need to look at the grand game as well. There is the specific fight against all these villains, but there is also the strategic interests of the US.

As it stands right now, there are two main adversaries. One is the rise in political Islam. This is still very much en vogue in Europe and many other places in the world. Lately we have had problems in Sweden with anti Semitic crimes done against the Jewish minority there. The same is happening in Denmark.

At the other hand, there is China.

As I see it, if we do not stop China on its expansion, we will be the slaves in forty years. Or, perhaps if Europe gets a necessary rebound, Europe can tackle the expanse of China, but as we talk right now, China mainly threatens American allies in the vicinity of China.

Now, there are many ways to tackle China, if we start fighting them, then we risk nuclear war and other nasty things. The US is not used to such warfare, and will suffer a lot.

This is the ultimate scenario however, and either the US can accept the sway of China, or start doing something about it. Chinese are traditionally not fighters but bureaucrats, so they will try to fight us in cyberspace and so on, but on the ground usually Chinese never win.

I am not saying that we SHOULD fight, I am saying there is a challenge here, and we need to get on the ball to fight it.

So all good ideas are welcome, but we need to show some initiative.

The same goes for ISIS, they are not dead, and just leaving them alone will be a grave mistake.

Lastly, the base of the ideas I have had is Democracy.

What we need is to find faith in that.

Fighting should always be FOR something.

Fighting ISIS was FOR democracy. So we need to stay sharp on these priorities.

Foreign policy is a great chess game, and the best player wins.

So we need to use our skills to be the best at that game.

Otherwise we lose, and that will not do.

G-d bless the will to fight for the survival of the West.

Ok guys, we have to do something that is neither popular or normal in a political environment. You guys need to share what I write here.

When i begun, I was the founding father og the new liberal, pro Israel, conservative right. After some years, I became the man behind the new liberal, conservative left.

So now I have actually founded BOTH sides of the aisle. There has, to my knowledge, never been an actual situation like that in the history. I suppose it is because of the times, how the internet works, or just because everybody wants to be the best. So they take the best philosophy that there is out there.

But, I can see, that both sides really need me. The liberal side needs me to rebuild their political, philosophical base. The right needs me to steer clear of some of the pitfalls that is really threatening them.

So I am really needed everywhere. Not to mention, that I am needed in Israel, in Denmark, in the UK, in France, in Russia, in Germany and Sweden, and Iran and in the grassroots movements I have started in Europe. Not to mention the Anglicans, the Catholics, the Sunnis the Shias, the Jews, the Cabbalists.

In essence, I am much needed everywhere in the world. The absurdity of the matter is, that writing here on the blog is essentially a hobby. I get no money, my wife accepts it, but she needs to see some income to support the family. So I have to take a job to support us. Add to this the fact, that the Danish system has been persecuting me for talking a stand against Islamism.

That is difficult. But that is the task at hand, and I am doing me best to be there for everybody.

So it may sound glorious to be an international philosopher, but the reality of it all, is that it is basically a lot of worries, and very little you get in return in any way.

But ok, that is ok, I do this out of idealistic motives, not to get anything out of it, and that is why it works. Everybody can see, that there is zero corruption.

But, back to the fight between the right and left in the US. I have to be there for both parties. Why? Because you are my responsibility, and as an existentialist, I believe, that what defines you as a moral person, is to the extent you live up to your responsibility in the world. It is my duty, and I try to uphold just that, oldfashioned or not.

G-d bless the will to do good in the world.

Yesterday I was at the movies, I saw The last Jedi, and I truly wept through all of that film. It is what I believe the US should be. Warm, accepting, fighting the neo nazis. Fighting for the Republic.

But the truth of the matter is, it is not anymore. The faith in Democracy has become twisted and deformed. I understand that there is some cleaning up to do internally. I truly support this, it is good.

But the old beacon of hope and humanity is on pause. That is just the way it is.

We, the rest of the liberal countries have to understand this, and do what we have to do.

I have been hesitant for a long time to say that American leadership is on pause. But it is.

This gives the rest of Central Europe a great opportunity, nay, responsibility to change course, and actually start moving out for ourselves.

We need to strengthen our own systems in the lack of American leadership.

This means one overriding theme, and that is investment in security. We cannot expect the American to save us, so we need to invest ourselves.

We also need to start solving our own problems.

Instead of challeging Mr. Putin, I believe we should make peace with him.

I know there is still the unresolved issue of Ukraine. But we need to start discussing these things with mr. Putin, and stop the warmongering.

This will leave us room to tackle the security issues we have with islamists within our own borders.

This is the problem we need to address, as I see it.

Already we have begun to formulate new principles, so that the proces is civil and stays within the limits of the human rights council.

Denmark has taken the lead here, and we are implementing the principles rather soon.

We can, if we wish, do the same in Central Europe.

Basically we need to repatriate all the migrants who are endangering the peace and civil authority of the states.

This will require a cooperation with Northern Africa and the Middle East, but it is possible. Especially with the traditional allegiances we have with the countries there.

So WE need to lead.

We have the intellectual leadership already, what we need then is the physical institutions to back the intellectual leadership.

G-d bless the will to be honest and civil in a dangerous situation.

On the right wing, there is a fight between those who do not accept race as an explanation, and those who do.

I have, more or less, been the philosopher that created the first trend.

As things progress, I believe, that it is important to understand what my ideas were, and how they could change the world, and most importantly the Western world.

I truly believe, that there is no such thing as race. There are tribes, cultures, political systems, religions, mystical spiritualism. But races are not a part of the human makeup. We are all one race, made in the image of G-d.

That is what I believe.

At the other hand, some people still hold on to the Darwinian system, that is called social Darwinism. The most dominant of these systems is National Socialism. Aka Nazism.

I do not believe in that. As with Communism and other artificial political systems, it just wreaks havoc on the earth.

Any kind of system must be based on solid experience. As Democracy, this is how we have organized things always up here in the north. So we know it works, it has its problems and weaknesses, but it is the way we like to organize.

As a consequence of this idea, what I have fought for, is not the white race, but Democracy. Because I believe, that the content of our civilization is what we need to fight for, not some dark and wrong natural philosophic idea.

When we do that, we not only strengthen our culture, we also create a better and more just world. We fight for the best in ourselves.

This does not imply, that we should just sit down and sing Kumbaya. That is also naive, and represents the worst in our culture, that of lack of responsibility towards the world. Too much freedom, just for the sake of freedom.

So my recommendation has been to challenge the problems we face, as a democratic problem. When migration overwhelms us, we need to use the tools of Democracy to tackle it.

So for instance terrorism, we fight that as a problem for Democracy, calling them islamists. Islamic state fighters.

And migrants with no respect for our civilization we repatriate them. Because they need to respect our ways to be able to live here.

But that is NOT a racist view. I truly respect all creeds and people, as long as they accept and support the constitution.

Because the constitution is what we should all hold sacred, if not, then THAT is a problem.

Looking at it in this way, making a wall makes sense, because obviously a porous southern border makes it possible to cross the border without any check. Democracy has adversaries and enemies, we should remember that, and act accordingly.

We do the same here in Denmark right now, and we are making an example.

Build the wall, but not as a symbol of race, as a symbol of our responsibility towards the constitution that is in danger due to people who come the US with no respect for the most basic human rights.

That is the way I see it. We need to, all Americans, with whatever color, to support the basic creed of the mighty nation of the US. That of the Amendmenst, and the respect for rule of law, and public assembly.

G-d bless the United States of America.

In this world there are many dangers for an honest man. The prime danger is that of the darkness. It lures him, it beacons him, and it always tells him to just take one little step down the path of darkness.

Though we try to keep that little beacon alive, by being true to all that it symbolizes, we are often sucked into the dark side. The lies, the corruption, the going with the stream, the closing our eyes to things that used to matter, when we were young. It is so easy, just lie, and you do not have to live with the consequences. Be honest and you have to fight all the time.

That is hard.

One of the greatest dangers to my experience with the darkness is looking into it.

To be honest, I have many friends who are working in the dark. Kabbalists, knights hospitaliers, and then some.

I like them, because often working in the dark, will take the strongest man to survive unscathed.

So why do all these secret players like me? It is because I represent what they are truly caring for, and fighting for, and thus by keep looking at me, they are strengthened in their own character. They are filling up those reservoirs of faith by keeping a friend who is a worker of light.

Sometimes they are honest, as when PET, the local police secret service were honest and admitted that they have no conscience, and that led to me criticizing and telling them, that they are supposed to be those with the most conscience, in order for Democracy to trust them.

My basic point is, the more you look into the darkness, the more you become like it, if you are not careful.

You need to replenish your tanks of light from time to time. Do not succumb to the siren song of believing that secret societies are behind all that is evil in the world. There are plenty of evil who do not happen to be in a secret society.

Actually most evil is not really organized by ancient friars, but are gang banging, criminal thiefs who happen to be right at ones doorstep.

So they are the ones who needs a bit of wacking from time to time.

Do not misunderstand me, the lights most dangerous foe is darkness, my point is just, it is everywhere, and it needs to be fought where it is.

By all who try to do good in this desperate and dangerous world.

G-d bless the willingness to see clearly in a difficult and often hazy situation.

One of the main consequences of a Darwinian understanding of the world, is that we still see competitition between people as a fight between races.

We sincerely still believe that either the white race will dominate the world, or at the other end of the spectrum, that the white race should be dissolves.

Especially Germany has been hard hit with a Darwinian understanding of the world in the Second World War, where Hitler made the Darwinian ideas political philosophy.

For many years, we have tried to fight these absurd race theories, but failed. Why? Because the true medication to the problem is not to fight the white race or not, it is to get rid of the very idea that there are races, and they always fight each other.

It’s nonsense. There is no such thing as an endless race war.

Taking the Empedochlean understanding to a political level, we see, that the theories stop this absurd madness.

We do not have to talk about a race war, because we do not believe that there is such a thing. Yes there is strife in the world, but there is also love.

The religious person, what does he strive to do? Does he search for strife, or does he try to make a world where there is more love?

See, with a more sound worldview, the whole system of abuse and ridiculous ideas of Darwin is healed away.

Instead of Germany fighting its history of race war by mixing its own race with other races (the very idea makes me sick). Germany should fight the very idea of a world with races, and fight for a world where strife ends.

See the effect of a sound idea about the world?

Essentially it is because Darwin used the Empedoclean ideas but removed spirit of the theories, that we have ended up in this absurd ideas.

DO NOT remove G-d out of your ideas, it will create hell on earth.

Humanity needs a positive aim to function.

We have become g-dless, and we are paying the price.

G-d bless the willingness to accept the new ideas brought forth. Not only by the religious community but by the scientific as well. We need to heal to become sound again.

The main problem for religion these days is the lack of theory that competes with physics and natural science in general.

I have tried to make an alternative to the current physical theory regarding spirituality. That of my Anaxagorean explanation of G-d, and I have also tried, some years ago, to compete with Darwin.

After reading the book of Empedochles, I believe my ideas about nature in relation to spirit has come full circle.

My main point about Empedochles in relation to Darwin has been, that the Darwinian expiation of natural growth is wrong in the sense that it is too simple. According to Empedochles nature develops in a cycle of strife fighting love. First love is predominant, then strife, then love and so on.

This goes hand in hand with Darwin who believe that there are two main motors of nature, that of survival of the fittest and that of sex.

In fact it seems quite probable that Darwin have read Empedochles, his theories are quite similar, just a little bit more primitive in its construct. Darwin does not talk of cycles to my knowledge.

There was one point I have missed in my reading of Empedochles, that I have now added to my understanding. That is, Empedochles was spiritual. He sincerely believed, that love is G-d. Most religious people of cause recognize this point. We all believe this.

But the thing about Empedochles theory is, that he believes, as a consequence of his faith that love is G-d. That in nature there is a fight between love (G-d) and strife.

See the picture. With Empedochles we actually have a serious theory that competes very well with Darwin. And to us who are actually religious it has the added bonus, that it includes an understanding of G-d in nature.

Let me try and paint the picture in a bit more vivid way.

Take a reef. A reef is often an amazingly beautiful place of life. Millions of fish wander inbetween each other, crafty seashells do their thing, myriads of plankton color the water. It is a place of beauty and, if you take a closer look, of love. The Dolphins love their offspring, the seahorses take care of each other, even plants have friends and family nearby.

A sacred place of love.

Then a epidemic foreign sort of crab starts invading the sanctuary, it destroys a lot of the fish and vegetation, strife has arrived. The indigenous species fight back and eventually a new balance arrives. Love is then again in the air. Get it?

If we can actually shift our understanding of nature from a Darwinian perspective to a Empedochlean perspective, nature all of a sudden makes much more sense. Why is it, that we try to protect nature? Because it is a wonder work of G-d. Why is it that we try to understand love and peace in the world? Because this is the G-dly state of things.

Off cause sometimes we need to take up the gun, if we are invaded or evil is in the air. But otherwise we try to copy the realm of spirit.

G-d bless the will to do good and see the world anew.

Well it is a new year, all fresh and promising of things to come. Often we forget the true qualities of the world and art. We live in a simple yet unadorned life. We THINK that the conundrum we are living in is all there is.

I was reminded of this when I accidentally fell over this amazing and beautiful classic poem. It is a prayer to all the G-ds of Hellas, one by one. The beauty of it, makes me want to cry. So this is my tiny news years gift for you. Remember that life is more than just fighting and surviving, sometimes we may rest and be nurtured by beauty.

——————————

“Come to me, O Beloved Mistress, Three-faced

Selene; kindly hear my Sacred Chants;

Night’s Ornament, young, bringing Light to Mortals,

O Child of Morn who ride upon the Fierce Bulls,

O Queen who drive Your Car on Equal Course

With Helios, who with the Triple Forms

Of Triple Graces dance in Revel with

The Stars. You’re Justice and the Moira’s Threads:

Klotho and Lachesis and Atropos

Three-headed, You’re Persephone, Megaira,

Allekto, Many-Formed, who arm Your Hands

With Dreaded, Murky Lamps, who shake Your Locks

Of fearful Serpents on Your Brow, who sound

The Roar of Bulls out from Your Mouths, whose Womb

Is decked out with the Scales of Creeping Things,

With Pois’nous Rows of Serpents down the Back,

Bound down Your Backs with Horrifying Chains

Night-Crier, Bull-faced, loving Solitude,

Bull-headed, You have Eyes of Bulls, the Voice

Of Dogs; You hide Your Forms in Shanks of Lions,

Your Ankle is Wolf-shaped, Fierce Dogs are dear

To You, wherefore they call You Hekate,

Many-named, Mene, cleaving Air just like

Dart-shooter Artemis, Persephone,

Shooter of Deer, night shining, triple-sounding.

Triple-headed, triple-voiced Selene

Triple-pointed, triple-faced, triple-necked.

And Goddess of the Triple Ways, who hold

Untiring Flaming Fire in Triple Baskets,

And You who oft frequent the Triple Way

And rule the Triple Decades, unto me

Who’m calling You be gracious and with Kindness

Give Heed, You who protect the Spacious World

At night, before whom Daimons quake in Fear

And Gods Immortal tremble. Goddess who

Exalt Men, You of Many Names, who bear

Fair Offspring, Bull-eyed, Horned, Mother of Gods

And Men, and Nature, Mother of All Things,

For You frequent Olympos, and the broad

And boundless Chasm You traverse. Beginning

And End are You, and You Alone rule All.

For All Things are from You, and in You do

All Things, Eternal One, come to their End.

As Everlasting Band around Your Temples

You wear Great Kronos’ Chains, unbreakable

And unremovable, and You hold in
Your Hands a Golden Scepter. Letters ’round

Your Scepter Kronos wrote Himself and gave

To You to wear that All Things stay steadfast:

Subduer and subdued. Mankind’s Subduer,

And Force-subduer; Chaos, too. You rule.

Hail, Goddess, and attend Your Epithets,

I burn for You this Spice, O Child of Zeus,

Dart-shooter, Heav’nly One, Goddess of Harbors,

Who roam the Mountains, Goddess of Crossroads, O Nether and Nocturnal, and Infernal,

Goddess of Dark, Quiet and Frightful One,

O You who have Your Meal amid the Graves,

Night, Darkness, Broad Chaos: Necessity

Hard to escape are You; You’re Moira and Erinys, Torment, Justice and Destroyer,

And You keep Kerberos in Chains, with Scales

Of Serpents are You dark, O You with Hair

Of Serpents, Serpent-girded, who drink Blood,

Who bring Death and Destruction, and who feast

On Hearts, Flesh Eater, who devour Those Dead

Untimely, and You who make Grief resound

And spread Madness, come to my Sacrifices,

• And now for me do You fulfill this Matter.”

[Tr.:E. N. O’Neil]

The people of Iran is in a rebellion. Let me be clear about this, any people who cry for freedom has the undivided support of Denmark and Israel.

Why? Because freedom is the first step you take, if you want to reach a spiritual life.

G-d gives us freedom to find a way through the maze of the material life. Sometimes religion does not understand this and claim, that it knows the only way find G-d. Then why did G-d give us freedom?

If a system is good, there is no need of control. If a system is bad, the control starts.

I know that the leaders of Iran means it well. It is not so, that they suppress the people because they are evil. They are not evil, but good people.

They do it, because they believe that there is a path that is righteous, and that everybody should follow this path.

Now, why did G-d give us freedom? Because, the material world is in flux, it changes all the time.

So in order to reach a connection to what is good, you need to change with it.

That is why G-d granted us freedom, to be able to change when the material world changes.

There is no such thing as a fixed path to G-d. In fact, each and every person needs to find his or her own way.

That is why I say; set the people of Iran free. Let them decide. Give them peace, and not punishment.

Give them CHANGE.

But do it in way that gives no bloodshed.

G-d bless a way of being, that understand that G-d is there always, and we need to understand what HE wants.

There is a huge operation going on in the world to “drain the swamp”, apparently this has something to do with the Kazarians. The Kazarians is a secret Jewish sect, that goes all the way back to a Turkish tribe that was inspired by the Semitic G-d Baal, aka Satan.

Let me be absolutely clear about my stance on this, and on all things that has to do with Satan. All those who do the work of the dark lord are eternal enemies of the warriors of light.

To be honest, I had absolutely no idea about these Kazarians. I do recognize the lore behind it, I had previously figured out that banking must originally have come from Babylon. In Babylon the temples there arranged what we would understand as capitalist business, that is making shares and investment. I supposed it was carried into the modern world with the knights Templar, but some Jews must have managed to get hold of this knowledge also.

It is also not surprising, that the ideas has a kind of magical binding, but that it was tied to the dark lord, I had no idea.

My version of Judaism and Zionism however is the exact opposite. I WISH I had some more money, because living two steps away from the gutter with the secret police on your tail all the time really sucks.

Lately my situation has become a little better, but I am, compared to any banker poor as a church mouse, as we say here in Denmark.

My point is, not all Jews are evil, bloodsucking, child killing people, most of us are actually simple, normal people, who fight for a better world.

To us, Israel is the light upon the Nations, we try to help and support wherever we can.

I mean, if the argument towards the Kazarians is that they have destroyed the US of A, then what were I doing the last seven years of rebuilding the economy and supporting the ideology of the US?

So please, can we differ between people? As in all other peoples, there are good and bad people, some who unselfishly support their nations and try to build the nations around them, and those who follow the dark lord.

We should not let that divide us, we the warriors of light.

G-d bless the will to be honest in a difficult situation.

I truly believe, that in order for America to work, it needs its basic tenants of faith to be celebrated and used in practice.

When I have talked about American revolution, this is the idea. To take those ideas of America and use them again, a rebirth as a nation.

Then let us have a look on those ideas.

First of all, let us look at the foremost symbol of the United States of America, the Statue of Liberty.

One notices the crown on the head of the statue, and off cause the beacon.

That is American Democracy as it was envisioned in the beginning.

The crown is a symbol that is very old, it was used already in the time of the Hellenes, and was actually the symbol of Alexander the Great. It symbolizes the sun, and the sun symbolizes the enlightenment ideas of the Hellenes.

The sun was again a symbol of illumination, of finding and fighting for the truth.

Today we call it many things, transparency, good governance, human rights, freedom of speech, science and so on. But at the heart of the matter we have an idea that is conveyed through Plato mainly, and is called Neoplatonism.

The beacon is the same. A symbol of light.

In other words, the French gendarmes saw their newspapers and enlightenment ideas as a tool to create a new and more sound world.

They also wanted to recreate some of the ideas their ancestors the Vikings had of Democracy, so they, in a sense, combined these two things.

There you have it, enlightened Democracy. That is America.

A nation will only be great or strong, if it is strong in its faith.

So an American Revolution should be exactly that, to shed some light on all who are evil and wishes to do evil.

If you do that, the most puzzlesome things emerge. Often whom you think are the good guys are the bad guys, and vice versa. You cannot just continue with your presupposed ideas, you need to be absolutely honest.

But if you realize the enlightenment, use that amazing blaze of the goddes, you cleanse the world of sin.

That is the idea, and that is what happens, but very often this is a very painful process. The light is not necessarily soft and benign, it can be blinding and forceful, especially against those who do evil.

But that is really the task, to make America sound again, by being honest and straight in all matters.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Metaphysics have been out since the French Rennaissance. Why? Because the French Renaissance was an uproar against the clerical might of the aristocracy.

Since then Communism took the anti religious views to its climax making a material philosophy.

That is a philosophy without any religious views. The radicalism in that is quite astounding when you think of it.

But this has changed the last ten years, religion has had a bit of a comeback, and is not so hated as it used to be.

But still, academically, religion is treated as a historical or mythological science rather than a hard natural science subject.

We have to change this in order to reclaim what is lost.

I am reading an exquisite book of an Oxford scholar about the ancient philosopher Empedocles by Peter Kingsley, and that is a boon.

One of the points of the book is, that Plato differed between mythos and logos.

That is things that can be proved and things can be believed in.

What we need to do in metaphysics is to go from mythos to logos.

To prove the existence of G-d on a scientific level.

If you look at the hard sciences, the sciences that usually is considered in the realm of logos, they actually have quite a bit of mythos in them.

It is simply not possible to prove many of the theories of the natural sciences, because they are in the realm of the unseen.

Take the theory of gravitation by Newton. You cannot see gravitation, the only way to prove it is by mathematics.

I mean, that is only a PROBABLE prove. It can be disproved.

So there is always an element of mythos in the hard sciences. Ask a physicist and he will agree.

The question is not whether you can prove something or not, but to the percentage of the possibility of your prove.

What we can do, is differ between hypotheses that is within the realm of rational proving and hypotheses that is not within the realm of rational proving.

My hypotheses of G-d is square within the realm of rational proving. That G-d is intelligence that is inbetween all matter, is a hypotheses that can be discussed, proved disapproved just as Newton’s prove of gravity.

It is within the realm of logos.

And thas is all that is needed in order for at natural phenomenon to be taken serious.

I hereby declare metaphysics as reborn as an academic discipline.

Those are sweet words.

G-d bless the will to find and give G-d a chance.

After reading the bulk of the book about the reformation, (it is 500 years ago and is celebrated) one of my main realizations has been academic. I truly believe, that we have become too specialized, and too far away from the true academic outset. That of Plato, and then added some of Egyptian lore through Alexandria and then conveyed through the reformation with the Medicis. 

They call it Hermetism after a Greek g-d, but it is truly just the roots of academia that has been preserved in European culture through the dark Middle Ages. 

This hermetic ideal, that we still see as alive in only one university that I know of, that of Oxford, needs a rebirth. 

Why? Because the alchemical litterature that was the seat of these ideas had many flaws, and I understand that later academics have written it off as quack ideas and superstition, still has one overriding quality, it is a universum. A whole, where all parts is an integrated part of the whole. A university in other words. 

That is what we need to get back to, an overriding idea, that encompasses the different strands of university life. 

Politics needs to be based on the same ideas as metaphysics, physics. ethics, law, business, art and so on. 

It has to be a universum. 

By going away from the partmentalization and starting to grow an awareness of the uniformity of the academic ideas perhaps a more harmonious and stable society will grow. 

We have totally lost the view of what academia truly is, and we have each been dug into little caves of our own, not understanding what is going on in the room besides us. 

That is what this whole process about renewal and academic change is about, a quest for a more harmonious and systematic foundation under our sciences. 

Not a quack, rigid system, but a system based of the very roots of academia, seen in a new light of modern day life. 

THAT is what we need, as I see it. Get to understand the world again, as a harmonious and good place for all of us. Through that we can obtain peace.

G-d bless the will to do good in a difficult situation.

I believe, that what we need to do in the Democratic camp right now, is twofold. 

1. We need to prepare whom may be the next leaders of the Democrats for their presidential bid. I do not believe in coronations, honestly we need the grassroots to make their honest pick. But that does not mean, that we cannot start working on preparing those contenders that are here already. Bernie Sanders, Mark Zuckerberg, Joe Biden, and others. We need to prepare them for the battle of the presidential bid. 

If one charges and loses, at least we will be better prepared for the next run. In other words, we need a leadership course of some kind. I have tried to reach out for mr. Zuckerberg, I am writing a book about business and trust right now, with some of my friends, and I really wanted to ask Zuckerberg to join, but since my network is so frail and basically non existing, I can’t even find a way to ask him. I have tried to reach the US with a book release, but that seems difficult as well. Basically I am trying to reach out, but I suppose the distance is pretty wide. 

But, I will do my best to help all the contenders of the presidential bid. Then in the actual election, I will draw back, and each contender will have to fight on their own. 

2. We need to start making a new basis of the party. Renew ourselves. We have come far, but we need to develop new ideas based on the challenges the nation meets. Each candidate has his own agenda as well, but the PARTY needs a solid base it can fight from. Again, I have tried to reach the US with a book of mine, so that this process has some kind of traction besides of what I can do here from the blog. But we still need to develop, put up new ideas, understand what is going on, and make a success based on that. We have a few cards up our sleeve. We have the civil rights, we have a democratic/humanistic core, we have a possible renewal of the faiths, and we have a core socialistic idea about the commonwealth. In the UK they call it red Toryism, in the US we call it Obamanism. It’s the same, a center focused philosophy, that takes the best of each side and makes a new whole. 

Trump does the same actually, and he is winning, we should do the same, but we need good leaders. 

So, there is still some time until the bell rings for another fight, and we need to prepare. For me it is frustrating not to be able to reach the US, I am trying so hard, but that is how it is I suppose. We need to get going. 

Get GOING, for CHANGE!!!

G-d bless the will to stick your head into the maelstrom of problems and get our victorious. 

Well, it is Hanukkah again. For the first time, I have actually put up a Menorah, and lit seven candles. Ok, I did not get it right, starting way too late, so I had to light five candles one day. But never mind, it is not the way of the things we do that matter most. It is that we really try our best.

We are celebrating this day of festivities, because a long time ago, Jerusalem fell, but through a miracle we got it again. So in a sense these days it is an extra wonderful thing to celebrate Hanukkah, because Jerusalem is once again recognized as the capital of Israel.

But it is also a reminder of what that means. The celebration of light, is the celebration of truth and goodness. Of being honest and giving to other people, regardless of our own needs.

This is the meaning of Hanukkah, to be a little lightbringer.

Jews are each and all of us different, we are revolutionaries and polemics. That is why we are always discussing and trying to find way to make a better world. That is how it is supposed to be, the light is not a simple or conform thing. It is a everchanging discussion on what is the up and down of the world, and how may we help those who need our help.

It is each of us who are tasked with the mission to bring that little light forth to help another nation flourish and thrive. We never give the simple or easy answers, we give the hard and complex answers, But that is because here in the material world, nothing is simple, and nothing is as it seems on the surface. We thrive under the understanding that the world is always to be understood anew.

G-d bless you all, and a happy Hanukkah!!!

I believe, that the current crisis in the humanities, is really a lack of faith in the basic tenets of humanism. 

When Swedes cover up barbaric crimes to be humanistic, then there is something completely wrong. The same goes for human sciences, where semiotics and deconstruction is still more or less the crux of the matter. 

These basic linguistic studies are ok, but there is a problem in the thought construct, when it leads to paralyzation in relation to simple questions. 

There is hope, I believe that the greatest university of England, that of Oxford is regaining a sense of proportion, and of true humanistics. That old hag of a wonder maker, that enlightener, that bowl of beauty and enigma of the magus. 

This is where the true rebirth of European thought in relation to human sciences will start. To cut all the veils away, I believe, that we need to go back to the foundation of human science, that of the Italian Renaissance of the 15’century. The human birth of Egyptian/Hellenistic ideas as described in the the hermetic texts that is the foundation of human sciences.

The poetic, soft, brilliant ideas of that temple of On, of Heliopolis. The city of light. 

We need to regain our fervent faith in the scientific light of science, that it is possible to push away the veil of Isis, and discover the truths that nature has hidden for us. 

But in order to do so, we need the best lightbringers to step forth, have no fear for their safety, and bring forth that scientific light!

Let it shine from the parapets of the old school, let the gates be opened, let each and every researcher be filled with the urge to find truth in the world, have no regard for taboos and the “how we do its”. Let them find their inner wand, and fight the darkness that surrounds us all, just because we have no faith. 

Yes, there will be a public spectacle of ridicule and antagonism, yes some will be thrown in jail for their idealism, yes people will wrinkle their noses. But this is what science is about. Not a slow decay into nothingness, but a bright, scientific blaze that will open the door to newfound faith and strength in both character of the magus and strength in the culture thus inflamed.

G-d bless the will to be honest in the face of persecution and lack of acceptance. Be strong honest and true in these times where truth is a scarce commodity.

Europe is undergoing a vast changing motion these days, politically, academically and spiritually.

First of all, what is really happening? To understand this, I believe we should go back to the last time Europe really changed, and try to see the development in that light.

After many years of mismanagement and outright abuse of the European people, the renaissance took form. We still know many of the people who were the leaders of that time. Leonardo da Vinci, the Medicis, Twingli, Luther, Paracelsus, Erasmus, Calvin.

These people lived in a time that really created the first wave of European expansion.

After that there was the French Revolution that created the US, but the French Revolution owes a lot of its ideas to the reformation. The Jacobins reminds one of the Anabaptists, and the humanistic ideas of the French Revolution was really basically inspired by the humanistic revolution in northern Italy in the reformation.

That is why we see the Egyptian pyramid on the five dollar bills, because the humanists that had gone underground in Bavaria still held on to the Hermetic ideas of the Medicis.

Today we really wrestle with the ideas of the Reformation and humanitarian spirit of the quasi Egyptian ideas of the humanists.

In the sixties, we somehow dreamt of spreading all the humanistic ideas to the rest of the world, in our hubris we thought that people should just come to Europe, and they would automatically become as soft at heart as we were.

Boy, were we wrong. The humanistic ideas of the reformation has become so watered down, that we do not see, that they have become too brittle, and if people are not humanistic, they may not actually like the ideas, and keep on murdering and keeping slaves, as the Islamic State does.

This realization, that humanism is not necessarially adopted by all, comes as a great surprise to us, and frankly most people of the most humanistic countries are still in denial. Take Sweden for instance, they still cover up crimes so anti humanistic that it is just inconceivable that people can actually do so.

In the 15th century anabaptists and humanists were first put into cold water, then sliced by knives, and then put to fire after pouring brandy over them.

Today girls in Sweden are group raped, and then their abdomen is put to fire with a fiery liquid.

Same, same. The anti humanists have entered Europe, and Sweden is not interested in fighting this, despite the fact that it sees itself as a humanist country.

At the end of the day, the discussion between Luther and the humanists is the same then as it is today. Luther claimed that evil has to be stamped out with force, the humanists claimed that evil could be dispelled with dialogue.

We stand somewhere in between today. But the so-called humanists must get its act together, otherwise it is a direct insult to those heroes who sacrificed their lives five hundred years ago to teach us about humanism.

If we accept that anti human things just “has to happen”, and we do not act, with force, to protect those who are the end of that barbaric gun, we are not worthy the name. And their sacrifice would be to naught.

We need to act on this, no more acid burning, group raping, putting fire on innocent girls, this has to stop, otherwise there will be new vitriolic Luthers who will despise us for our weakness.

G-d bless the will to act on the new anti humanists of Europe.

Ok, mr. Trump has made Jerusalem the eternal capital of Isreal. Yes! That was a boon, thank you very much. That was a tough, ideologically driven decision with ramifications for the future. Let us see what it ends up with, but thank you! That was perfect.

At the other hand, I also understand, that this was a move for peace. How may we understand this?

Mr. Kushner, the son in law of mr. Trump is the Jewish peace envoy, and he is, if you try to understand his stance on this a man of peace. In fact I could buy him a beer in the local Kabbalah center. So again, that is truly on offer. Next time we see each other in Jerusalem, beer is on me.

The point is, that the Kabbalah prophesy of rav Ashlag is that Israel is a vehicle for peace in the sense that it will be the glue between the three monotheistic religions. That of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. If the gesture is of that, as a peace of that branch, then it is a process that all of us should celebrate. 

Next year in Jerusalem, as we did say. And here we are, hopefully it is a symbol of peace, and hopefully Israel will be as Jeremiah prophesied, the light of the nations. 

That light just got a little candle extra, and let us all celebrate for that. Because we are for Hashem, for the eternal fight against the dark lord and his sons, by the wielders of light. 

That is us, and let us put a little extra light in the Menorah, the commemorate all the sacrifices that so many Jews have done to reach this momentous point of history. 

Thank you mr. Trump, that was a wise and bold move, we stand by you, and having Jews by ones side, is not the worst in the world. 

Hashem be with you all, and may peace finally find its way to the Middle East, all the wartorn cities should find rest finally. Finally. 

In many ways we are at the same stage of development in these days, that we were in 500 years ago. 

500 years ago, the entirety of Europe was swamped in superstition, endless plagues, a completely corrupt Catholic Church. A world where charlatans and enlighteners roamed around. You could say, that the building blocks of the US were assembled at that time with great humanists as Erasmus. 

Today we have the same. Scourges of migrants wrecking the continent, a corrupt and inefficient political class, a church that does not stand up for the true victims, and enlighteners roaming around. 
Erasmus did not want to revolutionize the church in the sense that he wanted to get rid of it. He wanted, through a wise and sarcastic wit to change the system from within. 

At the other hand Luther was the true revolutionary firebrand who wanted to change it all. Who won at that time?

This is not to say anything wrong about Luther, he did manage to cleanse his world, and he created something lasting and beautiful. Protestantism. 

My point is just, do we want to make a total rejection of the state as it is right now, or do we Change the system from within. 

In this sense, I do stand where Erasmus stood, but as long as my ideas are not implemented, the call for a Luther just gets louder and louder. 

The reformation was an awfully bloody spectacle, and we risk by not doing anything, and being sucked up in endless fruitless debacles about this or that, that my vision runs out, and the Luthers win the day. 

Britain First and their rejection of EDL is a pretty good example of that. 

By not doing anything, EDL and its ideas are slowly going into the background, and a more radical vision wins the day. 

This is not to diminish the outrage that is behind Britain First, it is a call for the establishment in order to make it realise, that in order to survive, it needs to tackle the corruption, and the sloth and the inactivity. 

At least this is what we can learn from history, and as they say, unless you learn from history, it tends to repeat itself.

G-d bless the will to engage in history and learn from it.

I have been given the crisis in the British public regarding Britain First some thought.

First of all, if you feel that you are not heard, and everybody seem to accept that your country just goes downhill. It is truly understandable, that you end up not giving a damn, and then just throw all decency out of the window. 

That is, more or less, what the footballers, hooligans and exservicemen of Britain First is doing. 

I understand that. 

At the other hand, I also understand the need to distance oneself from people with a fascist background. Seriously England has always fought against that. 

When I introduced my ideas of a pro patriotic, Viking freedom loving anti islaimist theory. Everybody went on that boat, and it worked. 

Right now, we are talking with the very founders of Democracy, the Human Rights council, and they accept the premises. Because they are wise, balanced and human. 

So in essence, it was a huge success. Everybody agrees to that. OK EDL fell apart after a long ardorous walk of mr. Robinson, but the ideas have become mainstream. 

Then what I think is really the solution to the current predicament, is actually DOING something about the problems. 

It is not enough to recognize that there is a problem, you also have to do something about it. 

Making more surveillance is not going to solve the problems. It requires broad masculine soldierlike types to tackle all the violence of the Islamists. 

And the Islamists need to find somewhere else to live than in a Democracy. 

To take the wind out of the footballers fight, the state should start acting, doing something. 

With that, the footballers will feel that they are heard, and they will stop the uptick in violent rethorics and confrontation. 

Here in Denmark, we do a lot to give people who are frustrated with the current development a statesponsored and legitimate way to organize and help. It is called the Hjemmevaernet or home defense. 

In this way the state has a way to organize the protest, and also use the good people that are willing to defend their country in the actual defense. 

Instead of pitting the Patriots and the state against each other, we collaborate and try to work towards the same goal.

But truly what has caused the problems is the inactivity of the government, because the government has been to occupied with Brexit, and lost the momentum on home defense. 

Having the eye on both balls is pretty difficult, but it is necessary. 

Our experience here in Denmark is, that there is a lot of red tape to cut through. But it is possible, and it has given the initiative to the state instead of leaving it to the people of the street.

That is really what it is all about, keeping the initiative in this fight. 

Don’t lose sight of the aim, a secure and humanistic democracy. And start acting towards that goal, sooner rather than later. 

The world is watching, so there is no getting around it. 

Please, look at this from at humane perspective, and use the necessary means to keep the peace. 

G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in a very, very difficult situation.

We are truly living in revolutionary times, I have realised this, as I have kept reading about Paracelsus the rennaissance Doctor who revolutionized medicine.

He lived in a time, where the pest was all encompassing, then there was syphilis and countless other diseases that swept away whole villages. 

The medicinal arts had basically not changed since the antiques and it simply had no effect. 

It created such a deep crisis in the European society, that something had to be done. Enter Paracelsus.

Paracelsus was a quack and a vagabond, he wandered most of what we then thought was the world, and he sucked up all knowledge of that time. 

What he ended up doing, was to invent a whole new way to work with medicine. 

Medicine went from a philosophical discussion on the humors of the body, to being a strict empirical science, still is today. That is medicine looks at the body, and focuses on how the body works. It then tries to design a remedy. 

Paracelsus also was totally open minded anything that worked, he took it in. Folk medicine, magic, whatever, as long as it worked. One example is the willowbark tee, that soothed headaches. This is what is behind aspirin. 

So he was the real deal in a time where people demanded new answers. 

The same goes for politics these days. The political system that we have ended up with after hundreds of years of tinkering with it, is not working anymore. The result is a gigantic crisis. 

Europe is flooded with migrants, that is tearing the whole place asunder. The US and UK had plummeting economies, people are desperate for new answers, because they can see things are falling apart.

Enter the political philosopher. 

It may sound preposterous, but in many ways I feel a kindred spirit in Paracelsus. As me, he sought for answers in places other people see as wrong and not that fine. As me he is a weird type, not fitting in anywhere. As me he is absolutely convinced about his own knowledge that is way deeper than anything else anyone is bartering these days. As me, he is treated with utmost both scorn and appraisal.

A truth seeker and a magus. A unconventionalist and an iconoclast.

So as they lived in a medicinal revolution in the 16th century, today we are living in a political revolution. 

And it is not fancy ideas people are looking for, they are looking for something that crudely works.

This is what has happened in the US, that is at the helm of this development. The ideas that Barack and I put in the system is working, and it is slowly turning around the boat.

But also in the UK, in Israel, in Denmark and France. 

New, freshly minted political solutions to problems really dire. That will create what I inteded: A rennaissance. 

A rebirth of the ancients ideas.

G-d bless the will to understand new ideas and then use them to the good of Europe and all those who believe in that.

There is a lot of horror in the managing cadres of the British state regarding the rising and mounting problems with migrants.

Well, as the proverb goes, according to the Copts, who have had these problems the last 1400 years. 

“Don’t ask the victim not to cry, ask the offender to stop striking”

In other words, we have to be honest about who are actually causing the problems and then start doing something about it. 

First of all, what is really important, is the be clear on our own values. what seems to be the problem with Britain First, is the fact, that they have not been sufficiently outspoken about what they base their values on. If they base it in some kind of fascist dogma, this is off cause totally wrong. Shifting one kind of fascism with another is just stupidity.
Therefore we have been absolutely clear about the base we base our discussion of the migrant problems on. 

Democratic humanism. 

So, if migrants do not accept our democratic values, the rule of law and accept the sanctity  of life, they are not welcome. 

We see a long term threat to our democracy, if we have too large a base of voters who would like other systems and do not accept the democratic law

So, in essence, if a migrant is criminal or a part of a criminal network. That being an extremist mosque or the like, this is shut down, and the criminal is expatriated. 

We are working with the human rights judges right now, to find a way to include this in the official dogma of human rights. 

This is beginning to work, and it has created a sense of urgency in the migrant communities. They are realizing, that in order to live here, they need to abide by the rules. Otherwise we are officially allowed to kick them out of the country. 

It is as simple as that. 

You abide by our rules, or you get a kick out. 

They understand that. 

They still fight for their case, and that is fair enough. But the violence and the criminal conduct, the abuse of public wealth fare and so on, is not helping their case. 

In conclusion, we have a viable, internally accepted process, that leaves a lot of room for the migrants to accept the rules, and it solves the problem of rising migrant violence of different kind. 

It is definitely not easy, but it is a way of tackling the problems that is not inhuman or uncontrolled. 

It is a fair process, that hopefully, will solve the problems in the next ten to twenty years. 

G-d bless the will to be honest in this difficult situation, and use the right levers of the state to solve the migrant challenges.

I do a lot in the business of helping other people. As a day job I help a young disabled man, who are in need of constant help. As a philosopher my single most important job, is to try and help around the globe. 

So, as a person, I believe I have some insight into the great and difficult art of helping other people. 

Let me be honest about from the beginning. Sometimes I really hate it. When the bills are difficult to pay, when you harassed by the system, when people hate me. Times like that, I really hate it. 

Not that I would do anything else, but I believe that being a helper is not for the fainthearted. You should not try and help if you want personal gratification or to feel good yourself. If you have these motives please try and focus on other things. 

Helpers need to help, because they see it as a moral fight and mission of a spiritual nature. They do it to pull people out of the material trap that is often trapping people. 

In a sense, you should be strong enough to delve into the world of corruption, abuse and alcoholism without being tainted by it yourself.

That is really, really difficult, you have to be strong at heart.Empedocles, the Ancient Greek philosopher saw natural development as a sphere. At the fringes of the sphere there is strife, in the center there is love. Helping is about putting yourself into the midst of that sphere and be the little seed of love. Because the natural development of the sphere is to move forward and backwards from strife to love, to strife. It is a movement of waves. 

So instead of producing a wave, what you do, is to find the center of the sphere of a given community, and support that. 

It is not about yourself, it is about other people, that need help.

Now, going out into the wild is like a frontier movement. People who need help, are often sucked into the material world big time. They suffer from all kinds of misgivings. They drink too much, sometimes even taking harder drugs. They steal, they are violent.

These are the people, who truly need help the most. 

But working with people like that is not easy. Because how do you really help people who are so sucked into the material world, and are almost dying of it?

You do it by being a good friend. It is not about the money, it is about your support on an human level. 

This will put yourself in a tough spot, so you need to be strong. 

Being strong yourself is the most important. That is why you should focus on getting your own life up to date and as sound as possible. Off cause you should do that regardless, but also because if you put yourself in a situation where you have a mental surplus, then you are truly able to help.

Now, what do you do, if you are a philantropist, and happen to have a lot of money that you want to do good with in the world. 

First of all, don’t buy the easy tricks. Don’t go with the mainstream, go out there and find people who are in need. But do not support them yourself, find those people in the local community who are the ones who try and help and have some mental surplus themselves, and help them. Because these Angels in the local community are the ones who truly know what is up and down in the community, and are not prone just to take the money for themselves. 

That is really the difficult part, because good people usually do not cry out for money. They are content in just doing their work. 

But if you give them some money, they can enhance what they are doing already. Just make sure they are not dependent on you.

The truly difficult thing about helping and philanthropy in general, is that the persons who truly needs your help are those who cry out the least. They often just suffer, suppressed by someone. 

A good example are the Egyptian Copts, who are an amazing Christian minority. They are so uncorrupted themselves and amazing, and they receive very little help. 

That is a good project there, helping those Copts, they are actually in a lot of problems right now. Suffering from abuse of different kind. 

Giving them money would be a kind thing.

Then, never go on the beaten path. Because the beaten path is usually just another system of power abuse of some kind. 

Go out there and look for people who suffer in the silent. Like the Yazidi who were sold as slaves by ISIS. 

So in essence, find the local lightbringers and try to help them. 

G-d bless the will to do good.

We are now entering the next phase of the defense of Europe. The European states have, as usual, not done much. After mr. Trump tried to push them a bit on the war on terror through NATO, what has happened? In Denmark they have, after a long time finally decided to target….. Russia. 

The only conservative thinker that has pushed an antiterrorist agenda has been me. This has been accepted, but still I am held in the farthest possible distance to any real money, influence, power in general. It is not that I want that, but it is pretty symptomatic, that I am held in contempt, because they are not willing to do what is necessary themselves. The same goes on in most of Europe, there has been a small little surge in investment of military capability but it is mostly without any real focus. OK the European Union wants to build an army, but to what end?

What we need to focus on, which should be pretty apparent is the horde of IS fighters returning from the Middle East, not giving them better treatment than our own veterans. Imagine that. 

It is really painful to be a witness to. 

Me myself, they have, more or less, stopped the persecution. But there has been no compensation, excuses or anything like that. The media is still closed for me, anything that could actually make a life just a little better than living with one foot in the gutter, being terrorized on the job, doesn’t really seem to appear. 

According to my friend, it is because I am an extremist. Thank you very much, as if accepting massrape of women is not a bit extreme. Who is the extreme, the one who criticizes it, or the one who accept it?

My best advise to the Americans is, push on. The European laggards should be pushed to actually confront the terrorism there is in Europe, and we should not accept Denmark as terrorising and persecuting anyone who dare to speak up. It is disgusting. 

I know that there has been a lot of discussion on Britain First. Let me be clear, I do not know the basis they found their ideas on. It seems to me, that they are pretty vague on that. So I have no clue on their conduct, that is why I have not officially discussed them. 

According to my friend Melanie Phillips, they are fascists of some kind, and off cause swapping one kind of fascism for another is stupid. 

But that does not make their basic criticism wrong. Off cause a part of the Muslim community needs to be tackled and stopped from spewing anti semitism, hathred for democracy and so on. 

One wrong does not make one right. 

So, my advise is, start getting serious about these problems, it’s painful for the rest of the world to look at this outright treason of the European people. 

So can we please do something about these problems, on a sound democratic, humanistic basis. Taking care of the weak, who happen to be little vulnerable girls. 

G-d bless the will to see through all the fog, and be strong in fighting for those who are weak and vulnerable.

In the rennaissance, or rather one of the rennaissances that of the 15 th century, we had a huge move away from barbarity and to humanism. 

When you read the books of that time, you really understand why. In one of the books that I am reading you hear a lot about what was really the “rave” of that time within the community of shamans of Scandinavia. I suppose it is what we call Vølver here in Denmark, men and women of prophesy. 

What they did according to the book I am reading, was to skin the legs of a man, and make nice trousers of them. Imagine that. 

Another thing that was real all hip, was to chop off the hand of a thief, and dry it, to make a Talisman of that. Not civilized. 

What I am saying is, that we have become humane, but there was a time, where we not humane. 

In these times of migration and influx of people who have not been tought with humanism, a lot of the things that we have moved on from since the 15 th century is making a comeback. 

Especially ISIS is remarkably renown for the barbarity of their conduct. But also organized rape is appearing in many places of especially Northern Europe by migrants. 

In a sense we see that the dark times that we have moved on from is returning. 

For me, this is really the crux of the matter. Will we fight to keep our humanistic societies as humanistic, or will we acceptthat the dark times of Europe are returning. 

In a paradoxical way the humanists are usually the ones defending the barbaric migrants. That I simply cannot understand. How can one who are sworn to protect the sanctify of life defend child molesters?

It makes no sense to me, and it is a misunderstanding of humanism. Humanism is not soft on crime, it is the wisest and most enlightening harbinger of justice. It is not soft of people who molest children, but will unconditionally hunt them down. 

Because the vision of justice and peace is always challenged by injustice. We saw it with nazism, we saw it with communism and we are seeing it again with Islamism.

Democratic humanism must be strong to fend off the barbarity of people who do not accept that sanctity of life, but despises it. 

I know that not all Muslims are to blame, I recognize the movement of most of Muslims. At the other hand, muslims must also recognize and fight the atrocities that is made in the name of Islam. 

Raping of small children on an industrial scale. How can that be anything that the work of the dark lord?

G-d bless the will to understand the good of humanity.

We have developed here in the Western and eastern civilizations in moves and jumps. Latest jumps have been the minority caretaking of the cultural Marxists. The development we are in right now is basically mine, which is democratic socialism with a fierce renewal of faith. 

Each step of the way has been done by a bunch of philosophers or, sometimes with just one philosopher. 

I am reading a lot about the Renaissance philosopher or mystic Paracelsus. He is a bit like me. A mystic with a lot of skill and also temperament. A genius of his time, who is still parting the waters. 

He basically represents the move from mysticism to rationality. He was the one who invented a lot of what we see as empiricism and objectivism of today. A contradiction since he was a mystic himself. 

The move I have recommended and fought a lot for, is a move where religion and spirituality is mainstream accepted again. This is really not a move against the rationality of Paracelsus, but in fact a move within the religious community where we move on from Aristotle and Plato to Anaxagoras (the teacher of Plato) to a more complete and rational explanation of the universe. 

The Renaissance with its focus on the ancients is yet again taking another turn. This time FOR religion and spirituality. 

What I am basically saying is, that when we went on with rationality and objectivism, only accepting what we can scientifically prove, we lost a lot in the realm of religion. This we need to recapture to be whole again. 

But when we do it, we do it on a secure and profound basis. Not in any way superficially. 

G-d bless the will to do good and understand that metaphysics should have a come back in the major halls of learning. 

It seems to me, that the US foreign ministry is searching for at new strategy in the Middle East. 

First of all, again, as in the war between the Sunni and Shia, what is the endgame?
The Middle East does not really give anything to the US itself. So, if you wish to Make America Great again, perhaps focusing the resources where that goal is the aim makes more sense. 

I am here talking about China. 

The entire Middle East warfare theatre is facing a whole new paradigm with the new drone weaponry. 

I championed the idea of making small autonomous drones to fight ISIS. 

This development is now, more or less, complete. 

It gives us a weapon of such destructive power, that the nuclear bomb is a kitty compared to it. 

The aim of the development was to counter the strategical disadvantage we have in guerilla warfare against a ideologically driven opponent. 

It was pretty effective in Afghanistan, but we also had some drawbacks with the strategy. What we met was a lot of resentment by the civilians in the area, they felt that the way of making war was unfair. 

But, wisely deployed, we can win a lot of battles cheaply and swiftly. 

What we have to do, is to use the weapons where it has most and best effect. 

In ten years we are probably going to deploy it in Europe, in some areas before. France and Sweden are candidates for warfare of such a way, because they are really in danger of falling as states. In a desperate situation, we use desperate measures.

If I were the Americans, I would reach out to the European states that needs the weapon, then why not France?

Concerning the games in the Middle East. What I did was to support an anti Moslem Brotherhood strategy. That is, I supported Mr. Al Sisi in Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. This gave us a true act as a local player, because the people in the Middle East recognized us as a player with sufficient knowledge of the local power games. 

Israel is kind of reaching the same level of local player status. 

Talking with Turkey will abandon that strategy, which may be wise and then again maybe not. It gives Turkey too much power, and Turkey is actively fighting many European states including Denmark. So in a few years Europe will have to rap up the fighting against Turkey. 

So there is a choice there to be made. 

What I believe is important however, is to keep the peace. That is why I have supported those who want peace. 

In essence America needs to choose its friends wisely. 

What I would recommend would be to find a way to find friends in Europe and then take it from there. 

Also off cause support Israel and try to help where help is needed. 

Giving Israel an early acces to the drone weapon would be welcomed. 

At the other end of the globe, there is a more important game for the US itself, and that is to shore up support for the fight against China. 

This is important for the US itself, so it should be toppriority. 

We have to be realistic about all the dangers that the US faces, and act wisely in this wartheatre.

Be wise with our resources and plan ahead

One problem we really need to fix, is the fact that the Chinese has hacked the GPS system that we use for all our war vehicles, that has to be fixed ASAP.

Another thing is the fix the gap that will come between China and the US with the focus of China on AI. 

Combine AI with the new drones, that could give us a bit of a problem, see?

We need to focus on drone development, very heavily, and then start using the drones wherever necessary. 

Especially in Europe. 

G-d bless the will to be honest and wise in the use of our ressources.

Without being in the US, I kind of feel a change of sentiment in the Democratic Party. Where the Clintons used to rule before, now it is more the Obama way that is really the true Socialdemocratic ethos. 

Well, as a Socialdemocrat of some kind, that is beautiful. 

In Denmark Socialdemocratism has always returned to its DEMOCRATIC roots, when it was challenged. A good example is the movement of Hal Koch who lived just after the Second World War and the disgraceful conduct Denmark had been witnessed to by its own people. 

We did not do well in the Second World War, we never fought really, we stood down. So we felt that we had sacrificed our believes for a milder treatment by the Nazi war machine. 

What Hal Koch did was to go all in on Democracy. That really changed the story, and has ever since really been the modus vivendi for the Social Democrats when in danger. 

The same tradition is what I have tried to revive. To stop looking into Cultural Marxism, and look into the true roots of Social Democratism That of Democracy. 

That is really what I have basically given the US. A way back to the common ideological base we share. 

To be honest, I did not really know how the US worked in the beginning. I just noticed that Barack really liked my ideas. So I tried to help and be a friend. Still am. 

But I see now, that what we did together, was to change the direction of the liberal party back to a more sound and constructive path. 

As the legacy of Mr. Obama is challenged, let us not forget that. I hope that now when the downfall of Ms. Clinton is more or less at its end, we can start building on this new base. 

That is the aim of the book I try to publish in the US. 

To build a sound base under the party. A true, democratic, honest, enlightened, wise, just philosophy to support the community. 

G-d bless the will to be strong in the face of adversity. 

The climate in the Middle East is bad. Mostly it is due to no involvement by the great powers of the world. As the competition has vaned, the motivation to support this or that power has also vaned. 

The main opponent for the US is now not Russia, in fact friendships are built, but China. 

Some of the same dynamics that was between the US and Russia could be foreseen in the Middle East, if China decides to enter and have supporters there. Right now China seems more interested in not making any enemies, so I do not think China will fight in the Middle East.

This leaves the Middle East alone, to carve out its own future. 

First of all, if war happens between Iran and Saudi Arabia, who will loose?

Iran and Saudiarabia. I am not specific friend of any of the two powers, I hold my bets on international peace. But I truly believe, that fighting between two powers will not be good for any of the two. 

What are you to gain? Dominance? Money? Justice? Just think about it, what is the endgame. 

For Israel, I will only talk for peace. Israel should not enter in any formation of any kind. But talk for peace in the region. This is what Israel is about. Both Sunni and Shia should have acces to the holy sites of Israel, and Israel should be the protector of the common heritage of all three monotheistic religions. 

What we need is the world to prosper. For our kids to be happy. For beauty in the old mosques to be appraised. 

In this world of endless warfare, we should not look at war as the only way to solve a problem. Perhaps we can talk. Have the sense to lay down ancient grudges, and find a way to live side by side. 

This is what Israel and ultimately the world is about. Peace. 

G-d bless the will to find peace.

It is a little difficult to get through to the American public. It is a problem, that what I have done together with Mr. Obama has been kind of nullified. First of all, we really did a good job on foreign policy, secondly we laid the foundation of the economy that mr. Trumps is building on.

Anyway, as a way to get through to the public, and also start supporting the legacy of mr. Obama, I have send a really good book out to several agents in New York. The idea is to get a breakthrough in the US, and on this basis start targeting the criticism as well as try to explain what was actually going on.

I know that a lot of the things we did is going down memory lane, but the trends are still here. And I think we should honour that.

Apart from that, we need to find a new balance with some of the challenges we are facing.

One is the threat of the fight between Sunni and Shia in the middle East, another is the danger of collapse of American dominance in the East.

We are in danger of loosing a front there, and we cannot let that happen.

Things are not exactly going in the right direction, but we are still ok, more or less.

What we have to do though, is start getting serious on China. Do we want to beat them or not?

Whatever we do, we still need to see the danger they pose. As soon as they are in control, they will not care very much for us. So we need to prepare for the worst.

The book is also more than just a case for my philosophy, it is also a cry for redemption of Democracy.

THIS is what we need, faith in Democracy in this dangerous hour for our civilisation. Not lethargy or acceptance of our lot.

But faith, faith in freedom of speech, the right to have arms and the right to have our persons protected by law.

Bust most important, the right, and the will to be free.

G-d bless our wills to remain who we are, despite the danger of collapse.

When Rome went from a smallish Italian power to become a world power, it tried to put all the different faiths and creeds under one idea. That idea is called Christianity. 

But before that happened, there was something that was exclusively Roman. The idea of discipline and the faith in an ordered universe.

After many years this basic creed, the Roman, was weak, and many Romans called for a discussion on this. 

But unfortunately for them, they were seen as too primitive and unsophisticated. Greek philosophy was supreme to the primitive Roman ideas of disciplin, and order of the celestial realm.

The same problem is now present at the distant child of the Roman Empire, the British Empire. 

Today Englishness is seen as base and unsophisticated. People want to be citizens of the world, and no one cares for the base of said empire, that of England. 

If the Brits are to learn from the mother idea, maybe they should accept, that perhaps they are old fashioned, not in vibe with all the progressive ideas of the current globalist. But maybe that is what is truly melding the empire together. That of Englishness.

Englishness is again a mix of things. But even at the core of Englishness is an idea that is undivided, as of yet. The idea of freedom being the mother of the true Englishman. A stout, strong, proud warrior that will not bend his will to those who wish to enslave him. 

That is the core, as the Centurion was the core of the Roman Empire. 

Do not forget that, and please care for that old proud man, because he is what truly keeps the realm together. Maybe not in person, but as an idea and an ideal.

G-d bless the fair isles of England.

We have a very serious problem with migrants in Europe. In essence, it is defined by the lack of integration these migrants have with the mainstream culture of Europe.

In the U.S. most migrants integrate quite easily if they want, but not in Europe. This has lead to huge problems in the capitals of most European countries. The problems are really tough, we have seen a rise in terror, and a billion small problems in the everyday life of most Europeans.

The problems are so great, that we need to take the gloves off, but we need to do it based on civility, and in a way that the fabric of the civil society is not torn more to pieces, than it is now.

Let us be honest about the problem in Europe. We have a huge problem with Islamic extremism. But calling it extremism misses the point, it has come to the point, where it is not extremism anymore, but mainstream Muslim ideology to hate democracy and strive for the Caliphate.

That is the bare truth, and we need to stop that.

That is the motivation behind the case for a discussion on human rights.

The greatest problems right now is in London, where Islamic extremism is really rife. But also in Copenhagen, Malmoe, Paris, Amsterdam, Cologne the list goes on. We are literally sitting on a bomb, that keeps going off all the time in the most atrocious way.

The plan I came up with when I began targeting ISIS, was to differ between political Islam and secular Islam. That still works, so this is what I propose the European security apparatus to prepare.

A mass exodus of Islamic extremists out of Europe, to their home countries, or somewhere where they cannot harm anybody.

They are welcome to make a caliphate, if it is peaceful and is not situated in Europe, or anywhere else where we prefer Democracy.

So we need to arm up, gear up, and work with the Americans and Russians where we have simultaneous interests. But we need to prepare, or else this might just go down as a civil war, and then Europe as we know it, is finished

G-d bless the will to see things clearly.

It is really with great sadness I hear about the mass shootings in Texas. It is terrible, and yet we do not know who did that in terms of political address. 

The end and the beginning of it is off cause the grieving of the families in the church there. The sight of it, and the desecration is just terrible. 

What we should do, is pray for these souls that we have lost, and also pray for the wounded. 

This is a deep wound, that is both physical as well as mental. 

The body is hurt, but also the soul. 

When we enter the house of G-d, we do that in the understanding, that there is a place of peace there. When someone shoots into that place of peace, they not only shatter the bone and flesh, but also the peace. 

That is what is at stake here. The peace between people. 

Who are we to shatter that peace? What right do we have to demolish something sacred?

I say, by keeping the peace, and protecting the houses of spirit, we protect the realm of G-d. There should be no excuse for such an act. 

It must be punished, and those responsible should be brought to justice. 

G-d bless the peace we can find, if we are vigilant and strong enough.

Denmark has become the chairman of the European Community. One of the projects, that Denmark has initiated is a renewed discussion on Human Rights.

I have initiated that discussion, basically. It was my idea originally. So let me explain.

We have a lot of problems with foreigners in Denmark. They came as a part of the migration that the EU initiated fifty years ago. These foreigners are often ill equipped in the understanding of what it requires for them as citizens to live in an enlightened Democracy.

Often they do not understand what it takes, and often they actually seek other state systems. As we have seen with the rise of Islamism.

This has created a lot of problems for Denmark, and Europe in general.

Now human rights have many different components, one of the main components is the will to see each person as a living being with rights to be protected.

We off cause support this without doubt of discussion.

But there is another very important function of Human Rights, and that is the PROTECTION of Democracy.

Democracy will face new challenges over time, and the Human rights institutions must adapt to these challenges.

The most basic challenge to Human Rights is off cause if Democracy is not respected by the citizens.

It can create a situation, as we saw in the Second World War, where tyrants of different kind used the democratic system to take it over, and reject it.

This can happen, and the Human Rights must implement a sturdy system to counter this threat.

The system is off cause, already theoretically in place, discussed by the ancients.

It goes like this. According to Aristotle, a citizen has to accept and support parts of the democratic institution. That of the law and that of the democratic process. If the citizen, especially a citizen that is new, or comes from a new family of the polis, does not accept this. My idea is to take away the citizenship. In effect rendering the possibility of a hostile take over of the Democratic state void.

This is the idea behind the discussion of the citizenship and the rejection of foreigners who do not accept the law of the country they are in.

It is a defense mechanism.

This we want to implement in the European Human rights discussion.

It should have been there in the first place, now we must put it in, to defend the constitutions of the Democratic nations of the world.

Off cause this is not all we have to do, we need also to educate and help. But if a person has seen its as his purpose to fight Democracy from within, he needs to be expelled. That is the ultimate defense of a nation with internal enemies as Islamists and other villains of Democracy.

G-d bless the will of the council to see the wisdom of this.

It has been a while since the election and the spectacular result. One of the things I have been thinking about, is how we combine the ideas of the Liberal heartland in a new way.

A main topic we have touched upon is nature. How we try to take care of the wild, Barack and I tried to push a oceanic wildlife protection plan, among other things.

At the other hand, we have the community ideas of Mr. Barack Obama, and the ideas of the teacher Ms. Hillary Clinton, every happy kid is a result of a good little village and a good school.

It struck me, as I have begun reading this amazing book about the life of trees, made by a forester called Peter Wohlleben (read that book, it is amazing), that HUMAN organization reminds me very much of that of ancient tree forest.

Now, you will start accusing me of being a tree lover, and being one of those weirdos that like going into forests to hug trees and so on.

But my point is. We need to see HUMAN society as what it really is; an ecosystem.

Just as trees in forest connect roots to support their kind, we should do the same. Just as trees care for their younglings, we should do the same.

The aim of a liberal democratic system, must be to create a human ecosystem that thrives.

See people and societies as what it really is, a system we need to understand, in order to make the communities, the schools, the villages function.

THAT was shat Thoreau was trying to figure out for himself, the ecosystem of nature has a parallel in human society.

But this is where it gets really difficult. Because human society is like one of those ancient often corrupted forests.

Full of misshapen trees and unhealthy living conditions. Lonely tree stumps, without any communication.

We are living in a ancient wild forest without any foresters whom really understand us. Yes there is a few philosophers out here, but we are desperately rare.

Understanding the living beehives of humans require knowledge, and we lack that.

But if we take a fresh look at society, and all the elements of it, we can make it better. YES WE CAN!

By working tirelessly for those little villages and schools, those communities, we can make a better human society. Strengthen the families, make a sound democracy, make people care for each other, water the roots, take care of the saplings, make America free and healthy again.

G-d bless America.

Well, many Israelis are a little angry at me for defending the Iran deal I did together with Barack Obama.

Let me be clear about this. This is not just about Israel, it is a larger scheme, that includes all of the world. Here Israel is not just a local Middle East player, but a world player.

Remember when Mr. Shimon Peres was buried, what happened. The entire world went there to put him at rest.

For many in Israel he was a traitor because of the Oslo accords. I understand, they were bad. But to the rest of the world, he was the very symbol of peace that could come from Israel.

The reason why people around the world are so engaged in these peace processes is because it symbolises a greater hope for mankind. If Israel can make peace, perhaps the world can make peace.

That is what is at stake.

I think that the world recognised that the Oslo accord was flawed and basically a scam from the Palestinians. These criminals live off of charity of the world, the worst thing that could happen to them, was actual peace. Then they would end having no value to the world. So they stir up trouble just to be a part of the game. It is all they live for.

But the rest of the world does not need the conflict to be of value.

That is why, given a sufficient amount of wisdom, we can actually make peace.

We did it with mr. Al-sisi, we did it with the Saudis and we did with the Iranians.

Now, this is a fact, and it was a succes. I know that Mr. Netanyahu does not trust the Iranians. I understand, having bombs thrown on ones kids and people stabbed at each day is not a good thing for peace.

We have the same problems here in Denmark, and believe me, I am fighting like a wildcat to protect the Danes and the Jews, putting myself at risk, even my children are at risk.

But I have also a lot of personal experience with both Iranians and Arabs. They are not evil people, they have different priorities, but they are, as most civilised people striving for at better world.

We walk this line, the line of materialism and spirituality all the time, getting sucked into the material world and war.

I understand that we are afraid of Iran, but until we have actually started a dialogue with them, then how can we be so sure that they are not open to peace?

The Iranian people elected Rouhani, a man of peace.

Trump cannot sustain five dfferent wars at once. He has one in Afghanistan, he has one in and around Iraq, and two potential wars in China and in Europe.

As his friends we should not just drag him into a war because we can. We should think about what he needs as well. What he needs is strength to defend his own countries interests.

He is actually doing quite well in that respect, but we are supposed to be our brothers keeper, not dragging him into fights he has no real interest in.

I know this is harsh, but we need to respect he US, help them, put our needs aside and make him grow.

This does not imply that we should lay down our weapons and sing Kumbaya. We should defend ourselves, and we cannot accept a nuclear armed Iran in any way. So we need to focus on a better deal.

Fix it. So let us begin the talks with Iran, preferably with Mr. Trump involved and see if we can somehow make a deal that comes after the deal that is now.

G-d bless the deal that is possible.

I respect that Mr. Trump has listened to Mr. Netanyahu in his attempt to make at better deal with Iran. Fix it or nix it, well, we are trying to fix it.

But then what are the bodies of such an operation. Should I be the sole arbiter?

Ok, if that is what it takes. I will do it.

But then the Israeli side has to come forward with some more demands. If it is about making the arrangement work for longer time, then Israel should also promise something in return, like giving peace to Iran.

Right now, it is a bit like the EU deal, Israel has just dumped it, more or less.

Fix it? Well, what has Israel to offer?

G-d bless the peace we can find.

The whole shebang with Harvey Weinstein and the current disintegration the Democratic party is in, really puts forth greater questions than just the superficial questions.

Everybody agrees, that Weinstein is symptom of a deeper malaise. Seriously, how can we have carried such scum at our hearts?

Have we become so deranged and morally decadent, that this could happen in our society. I mean, this is one of those who were supposed to be the good guys.

If we take a look at it from a historic perspective, the answer however comes much more into focus. One of my leading theories have been, that we are still living in the dark ages. After having done a huge excavation in the ancient scriptures that lie two thousand years ago, before the dark ages, I can see, that we have lost a lot.

The driving force in our current societies are materialistic. You can name a few of the materialistic impulses; Nietzsche, Communism, Newton, Darwin, Feuerbach. Even my fellow countryman Niels Bohr, perhaps the greatest scientist of the materialistic age, was that, a materialist. You could have him excused since he was basically a unmaterialistic man, and were friends with the great theologian Løgstrup. But the advancement that Western culture has made in the realm of materialism is both amazing and, as we see with Weinstein, corrupting.

Metaphysics, the opposite of physics, that is the science of spirituality, is just as impressive as physics. There are still vestiges of these ideas in our culture, mostly apocryphal, that is hidden in hermeticism and Kabbalah.

But these metaphysical systems are just as developed as the physical systems we share all of humanity these days. Even more advanced in some areas, not least in areas of ethics.

I am not talking about making an era of metaphysics only. What I am talking about, is a new balance. We need to accept metaphysics, and the necessary conclusions in terms of ethical choices that these ideas give us.

We need to believe in G-d again, simply, to counter that corruption and decadence that our world has fallen into.

We still have the raw manpower and intelligence to make that move, but we need to do it. And perhaps that critical stance that we have taken towards some of the ill in our own culture, is a true beginning of such a move.

As I have said before, G-d lives, and we should move away from the corruption and force ourselves to be better persons. Shed the arrogance of the rich and powerful, and find solace in a more modest approach.

Materialism gave us sway over the entire globe, but at the price of our souls. That price os too high to pay, and we need to redeem our lives and find the love and unity that there is in faith.

G-d bless the will to be humble and more noble again.

I am a dancer, and as a consequence of that, I know a lot of beautiful women. They are not idols to revere, or someone to attract. They are my friends, true friends.

So, I know how it is to be a beautiful woman, and some of the traps and pitfalls for those human beings. When you are beautiful, attention comes cheap, but true love is difficult. It is like being a rich man, true love is difficult to come by, because the wrong girls are attracted to you. Not the girls who are in it to make a difference, or change the world. But the golddiggers.

It creates a negative synergy, where what you attract what is bad for you, and what you need is really difficult to get hold on.

This is what has happened to the Jewish filmmaker Weinstein. All the glitterati of Hollywood was his to command. I love his films, the “English patient” is one of my favourites. Weinstein must have known what is right and wrong, because he has made films that is a tribute to best in mankind.

But he used his power to demean and put down innocent girls. That is, how can I say, beyond evil. He was a living vampire, preying on the dreams of young girls. Leading to traumatic experiences for so many young beautiful girls, caught in his honeytraps.

It is beyond despicable, and I just can’t get it around my head, how a young boy from a respectable Jewish home could end up there. As a vampire. This is the exact opposite of what we Jews are supposed to be. We are supposed to be the light of nations, the good people, the Chosen people, remember?

And the worst thing about this is, that we cannot afford it. There is an endless cycle of violence against us, so just a little pretext is enough to cater the next pogroms. One Jews mistakes fall back on all of us.

They call what Barack and I have created in the Democratic party austere. Well, if caring about families, and helping the community is austere, then, by all means, let us be austere.

I did not know what was going on, I just hooked up with Barack, because he, as me, wanted to Change the world into something better. A course that we are reaping the benefits of right now.

Being better is obviously not doing as Weinstein did. That is the exact opposite.

Hollywood needs to come around, and especially Jewish producers should look into themselves and find what is good in them, and then act on it. Make a better world, not just in film, but also around them. Make a good vibe, a respectful vibe. Young girls are easy prey, especially if they want something, and they dream about something. But then give them a fair treatment. Pick the girls with talent, not those who are just willing to sell themselves.

We can do that, be serious, artistic and decent. This is what we are supposed to do, so let’s do it.

G-d bless the willingness to be an honest Jew, despite all the luring of the corrupt, be light bringers not the opposite.

I have few real friends, whom I actually truly appreciate intellectually. It probably comes from the relatively isolation I have ended up in. But I have one though, and he has just written an amazing book on sacrifice. Religious sacrifice in specific.

This book is illuminous in the sense, that it actually tells you a whole lot about the subject. Why we sacrifice, what that has to do with our intellectual, psychological and religious worldview.

Sacrifice is something old-fashioned, in the current society, we tend to think about our own needs before everybody else. The point of the book is, that if we are not able to sacrifice anything, we cannot work as a society. There are some functions of society that requires sacrifice to work. Parenthood is one of them, but also soldiers and fire workers sacrifice their lives for the common good.

At the heart of the argument lies a solid truth, that I believe is right. Sacrifice is the foundation of love. We cannot buy love, the only way we can be loved and show appreciation towards those we love, is through sacrifice.

This book will give you a deep, extremely well reflected understanding of that old-fashioned virtue. Something we might want to bring into our jaded lives.

Hereby, I give my full recommendation to the book, it is amazing.

You can buy it here if you wish.

I truly understand the view of Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Trump. And I understand, that there is a great worry about the proliferation of nuclear material, not alone nuclear bombs.

At the core of the worry is a lack of trust in Iran. That I also truly understand, there is a lot of bad blood on both sides, and still ongoing clashes.

But there is another thing that I believe that has not been truly appreciated, that is the fact, that Persians were friends before in the ancient times. They can be it again. The great Cyrus was such a friend of Jews, and under the threat of the Babylonians, Persians helped actually.

It is the depth of this relationship, that could promise understanding between Jerusalem and Teheran.

We are here, for peace, we are not here to destroy what has never been ours to destroy as harbingers of light.

If Israel is supposed to be the light upon the nations, that is a peace bringer, it should also be at least allowed to take up the torch of peace.

To make peace in the Middle East, is not about making peace with the Palestinians. These people are not good, it is about making peace with intelligent, worthy adversaries. True ancient peoples can and should talk at least.

The world is not ready for Teheran to have nuclear bombs, someday perhaps it will. But it is not now.

Therefor we have made the accord, and therefore it is upheld by most of the West including great countries as Great Britain, Germany, France and others.

We do understand, that Persia is the very country that invented the idea of goodness. Having a depth of civilisation and culture that is truly awe-inspiring.

Through this understanding, perhaps we can at least meet, and talk.

I, for one, stand for this agreement, but I also understand, that the agreement must be under discussion.

Let us start those discussions, and be partners and friends for the sake of the almighty, and the sake of good thoughts, good deeds, and good words.

G-d bless the willingness to be at peace in the Middle East.

Mr. Trump and mr. Netanyahu is pushing for a dismantling of the Iran accord. I made it with Mr. Barack Obama, so, of cause, this is not in my liking.

First of all, I really do concede, that Netanyahu has a point. If the accord ends up with Iran having nuclear bombs, it is simply a delay, not a problem solver.

At the other hand, a lot of the things that we promised Iran has not come either, so what we really need, is to talk the deal 2.0.

See? If we can talk about what comes after the deal is finished, we can actually enter into a meaningful dialogue about the outcome of the deal.

Fix or nix it, well let us start fixing it before we nix it.

What would that involve. Well, at the very least it would involve some kind of discussion with Iran. They are not that difficult to talk with, and they have their own agendas, and political positions they want to have upheld. There is room for negotiation.

Start there, at least try, then we will see what comes out of it.

G-d bless the outcome that may satisfy all.

When Communism seemed to stop working, the answer of some of the intellectuals of that time, was to blame the people. That is a wrong answer.

Hegelian Marxism did not work, because the quality of the system was to fraught with imperfections and constructional weaknesses. I know this, because I know what Marx read, I know the ideas of Hegel, and I know all the ideas that they drew on.

When a system is rejected by the public, it can do either of two things, it can start oppressing the people, or it can Change.

The world changes, but true Change cannot work, unless you actually know what you are changing from, and what the options for change is.

It is about knowledge, and wisdom. About knowing what architectural building blocks you can use, and how to use them.

A society is like a machine. It can be of good quality, bad quality or be a dump. But in order for the machine work, it needs parts that are interlinked and these links should be greased and kept in good order.

When the Frankfurterschool took over from Marx, they did an extremely poor job. Because in order to make at good society, you do not need oppression, what you need is a system which has been constructed with regards to the situation that the people is in.

Ideally, we Jews are supposed to support this task, as we are supposed to be the light upon the nations. That is the inspiration, the wisdom, the place you need to go to find new ways to Change.

It has been deconstruction for far too long, what we need now, is CONSTRUCTION. We need to start fixing all the wheels of the machine to make it work again. Help rebuilding the society, so that it remains secure, faithful, orderly, beautiful, happy and sanguine.

I’m am not talking about a dictatorship, I am talking about a system, that work. A system people will choose themselves, because they like it.

This is redemption. To start rebuilding all the little cogs ans wheels of society. Namely us. Make our families work again, our democracies, our political institutions, our churches, synagogues and mosques. Make things work again. It is not about being arrogant or being self-righteous, it is about the simple things in life. To see that things are going in the right direction. See more people having a better life. The lower the middle and the upper classes. All of us.

Deconstructions is over, now it is construction.

G-d bless the will to be positive and strengthen all the good things in our society.

There is another subject I have been avoiding, because it is a split between two people, whom i really respect a lot. Mrs. May and Mr. Boris Johnson.

They both seem to disagree a little about the course of the EU negotiations. First of all, I try not to take sides. I believe, that both try their very best.

But, the fact of the matter is. That the election was quite clear. It was an in or out vote, and people voted out.

Not reaching that result is not respecting the public vote. In that sense, there is really no discussion on the end result. Perhaps Britain can stay a little in when it comes to business, both sides have an interest in that. But any accept of the EU institutions sway over British institutions, would be a result not respecting the public vote, that is the people of Britain.

When the process has started, there really is not going back on that. How to reach that end is however extremely difficult, because the EU has decided not to engage in the negotiations in any meaningful way, humiliating Mrs. May in a terrible way.

What we need, and that may come from any of the parties of the Tories, is a solution to that problem; how do we end up with an independent Britain.

There really is no other way, cheating and dragging out the negotiations does not solve anything.

But, engaging with a sound and realistic strategy is the only way. I do not believe there is any other way than to just start the separation. Then the EU leaders will come forth and find a way to make a sound deal. Because who needs the deal the most? It is actually the EU. So Britain holds all the cards.

That is the reality of it.

G-d bless the will to find a serious solution to this devastating enigma.

I know it is a little late for the rejection of the central Spanish authority in their manhandling of the Catalan independent movement. But, I have had to think a lot about it. It is not that simple.

This is what I have reached as a conclusion.

First of all, independence is a right for all Peoples. Not giving a people independence is outright illegal. But there are often contradicting motives for independence.

If it is just motivated by economic growth, I believe that this is not a solid motive. If it is motivated by a wish to make a true democratic constitution, that is another matter. That I wholeheartedly support.

The right of a people to be free, is a right we should always support.

I understand, that the EU is also in two minds on what to do. On one hand, it wills to solidify the central government, but at the other hand, I understand, that there is a true respect for the will of the Catalan people. What other can you have?

The best course here is to support the Catalan people in the right manner, for the right reasons. If they want true independence, because they want more freedom, please let them have that. If it is just a matter of lack of solidarity to the rest of Spain, then I think the motives are wrong.

Then give them independence but suspect solidarity to the rest of Spain. Then the equation could be found right.

G-d bless the peace, that must come.

So it happened again, another round in the theatre of evil. Killing innocent people at a country concert. What is the matter with these people, who do such things.

If it really is ISIS, which it may very well be. It is forbidden to listen to music in Islam, and Las Vegas is a city of sin for the Islamists.

Then how can it ever be spiritual to kill innocent people! It makes no sense.

Anyway, we pray for you, and we feel the pain that you feel. The destruction and chaos seem absurd, but there is a light at the end of the tunnel. If we confront the evil that is there, in a sound and honest manner, it can lead to strengthening.

And if it is ISIS, then we must also realise, that their reach is long, and this battle far from over.

We must be strong, in the face of this corrupted behaviour. Have faith in our values and way of life. Because it is the best, and it will triumph in the contest with this abomination of a faith.

G-d bless United States of America, and may it keep its strength.

Germany has had a rough time these last hundred years. First there was the unification under Bismarck, then there were the years of a defunct Weimar republic, and lastly the second world war.

The problem for Germany is really not the political development. Yes off cause, as a Jew, and having family members fleeing from Gestapo, I really despise the Nazies. But in a political, developmental sense, the problem was not really the content of the ideas, it was the geopolitical implications of having a huge, strong power in the middle of Europe. It was and is too penned in.

Now it has shackled itself over the last eighty years, not to make anyone afraid of them. But that also does not work, even political correctness seems to anger many.

There is however a way out, but it will be difficult, and it would involve my support. You have that, there are many others whom read here at Rubicon, and right now, I am trying to make a political basis for the Liberals in the US, add to the this the stress of this being a work with no pay, it can be a little difficult. But, I will do my best.

Look at it this way.

AfD is a child of the Mohammad Cartoon crisis. In the aftermath of the cartoon crisis, Denmark was a part of a realignment of the right. I know, because I made it. These were my basic arguments. First, if the right goes apocalyptic in nazi feelings and ideas, the West will fall, and there will be no Jews left in Europe. So, what we need is another way out. We need a conservative ideology, that is not racist. This ideology should target Islam, but do it in an intelligent and humane way. Through the understanding of our own values, as freedom, democracy, humanism, spirituality and so on, we could build a positive image of ourselves, opposed to a negative of those we came to call islamists.

These ideas spread in the world, and today they include different parties that has not yet really riped to full fruition. But you know them. Donald Trump, Marine le Pen, Edl, SD, Generation identitaire and AfD.

My point is, this political development is designed to remake the political landscape, so that we may keep the democracies we have around the globe. The alternative was division. As we used to say in Edl; United we stand, divided we fall.

I know that revolutions are pretty brutal, and off cause the political system is afraid of them. But this revolution is not about ruining the system, it is actually about saving it from itself and the moral corruption that is in it. The lethargy and back ally deals.

So, there will be no problem in working with them, seen from the system’s perspective. In fact, basically the system will benefit a lot.

The alternative is a full destruction of the Democratic constitutions we have, and war without the state to participate in any coherent way. That is definitely worse, than what we have now.

So, I hope, that you can cooperate. I am not saying, that the system should take any crackpot idea and use it, but take the anger and protest serious, channel it into a well-functioning, systematized and humane handling of the problems.

The mass migration that happened some time ago, should be tackled head on, and within limits that are described by law. But it should be forceful.

G-d bless the will to tackle the situation with impunity and force. But still remember, that we are all humans.

Ok, I have begun a synopsis describing the things Obama and I did through the presidency. I know, that many liberals see the things we did, as a kind of way out from the deepening of conflicts that is inside the party and with the conservatives.

I have given it quite a lot of thought as I have made the synopsis. The genius that Obama had, was to give the liberals a new way. There are, basically two places where Social-democratism has not failed totally. That is in Denmark and the US. Why? Because it actually takes all the conflict that the new global world gives the West, and challenges them. Just look at Germany right now. The middle is absolutely imploding. Not so in the UK, in Denmark or the US.

Why? Because we have Changed.

The redemption for the Socialdemocrats, or rather the traditional center stage parties, is to tackle the issues of migration, terrorism, Islam and so on, on a solid, realistic basis.

Not taking these things into account will simply wipe out the center of politics, as in Germany.

We need sound, serious and often tough measures to counter the rising threat of Islamism, terror, migration, threats to women, gays, Jews and a terrible rise in crime that these migrations carry with them.

That is really the legacy of Obama, he gave us a way, that is center focused, not radical, but uses the tools of statecraft to solve the problems.

It is pretty scary to think about the German election. I made the AfD, but I also seriously want the state to survive. We are talking about a complete collapse here. That is a bit of a problem.

G-d bless the will to be strong in the face of immense problems.

The current negotiation between the UK and the European Union is not going well. Why?

Because the situation does not look like a normal negotiation. Usually two parts meet to find a solution to something, find a way to improve the relationship of both parties.

In this situation however there is nothing to gain for the European Union, and everything to gain for the UK. Let us face it. The UK has no special benefit of being a member of the EU. It is the other way around.

The UK is the second most powerful power of the world. The EU has no claim to fame. It is an unequal relationship.

So, the one side simply has no benefit of the breakup. What does it do? It tries to stall the negations, so that the status quo is kept.

How does it do that? By coming up with demands that are obviously nonnegotiable.

The UK must realize this, and act accordingly.

The EU is taking quite a risk, if the thing deteoriates into chaos, it will spread.

So, what will be the fortuitous strategy of the UK? It will simply be to undo the arrangement itself, but, and this is important, with little fanfare.

In order to keep the EU satisfied, one needs to recognize, that the EU is afraid the UK will rock the boat too much.

As in Eastern Europe, acceptance of the right outcome by the EU, but in a quite matter will serve both parties best.

Going head on into a conflict, that is where we are heading now, serves no one. The European Union will lose face, it will lead to chaos, and the Brits will have a lot of internal bickering, and perhaps even a change of leadership in the middle of the negotiations.

This will serve neither of the two sides.

Do it civilly and orderly, without too much fuss, and then both sides will benefit.

G-d bless the will to be honest in a difficult situation.