Ok Donald, now your first strike of foreign policy choices have been made.
To be honest, I am not that impressed with the strategic choices, but I do like the tempo.
First of all, strategy in business and in warfare hold some of the same components. You worry about your resources, you make a plan that needs to come to fruition, and you worry about the morale of your employees.
There are many other factors that are not alike, but these basic traits are, more or less, the same.
The fight against ISIS is so far evolved, that the answers to those question are pretty straightforward, and they have been answered just fine. This war, which is, basically, the most important to you, should really be your first priority. This means focusing on getting NATO up and running with the aim of beating ISIS, helping Al-Sisi, worrying about what is happening in Europe.
Secondly, there is China. I understand that you somehow made a deal with them in order to contain North Korea.
This really eludes me. I mean why even accepting the help of China. I can understand it, if you want to make a conventional war. But usually the way Reagan fought Communism, was with the CIA. That is secret ops, regime change and the like.
Communism usually leaves the people pretty unhappy, so they are open to new ideas.
If you go with CIA option, you do not need China.
China however is a whole different piece of challenge.
They are actually pretty happy there, and as a consequence the CIA will be useful, but who knows in this situation.
They are a much larger threat to US interest, they are stealing the jobs, and they are threatening US allies.
This challenge is much larger, and should really be mulled over. The war is inevitable, so we better be prepared.
G-d bless the will to think straight in a difficult situation.
Looking at the Middle East now after mr. Barack Obama and I have left it, it might seem a little bewildering what we were up to.
I mean, we tried to make peace with Iran, we supported the Arab states at the same time, and tried to find peace with mr. Putin as well.
Most other American strategies have focused, mostly, on the infighting between the so-called palestinians and Israel.
First of all, what we tried to do, and did with quite some success, was to elevate the conflict from local to regional to global.
Instead of focusing on the problems between to proxies of Gaza and the West bank, we tried to address the problems of the region at regional level. On one hand we have the Arabs, at the other hand we have the Persians. In the middle we have Israel.
Locally we tried to make the fight with ISIS a pannational project, we all could fight. This served the further goal of preparing Europe, and ourselves of the menace.
So it was a kind of killing two birds with one stone idea.
This actually worked, and we now have a broad coalition behind the fight against ISIS that serves the purpose of preparing Europe for the oncoming fight, and gives us a broad backing behind American lead priorities.
On top of this, it is a fight FOR democracy, since ISIS is against democracy.
It even goes further in the sense, that we do not target all muslims but leaves a window open for a peaceful cooperation, something that mr. Al-Sisi tries to help us with.
This very complex operation is still in service, but it has taken a huge hit in the Syrian debacle. We still have Russia on board on the fight against ISIS, but we should be VERY careful not to lose them.
Try to think about it, we have Russia behind an American lead operation. That has never happened before.
In fact Obama and I made a world-wide alliance, for American values that everybody agrees upon.
If we lose that, American involvement and especially ideological leadership will suffer tremendously.
So why do no-one understand this?
Because of the complexity of the operation, and because, honestly and here I truly believe that American media has failed, noone cared to ask me to explain the details.
You have to be really elitist or extremely nerdish when it comes to politics, to understand what is really going on.
Now we are not perfect, but the results talk for themselves.
And I truly believe, not at least because I think mr. Obama deserves some credit for it, that the American public has a right to know what we did.
We should truly celebrate the victory and the strength of the American perspective, instead of criticizing ourselves so much.
And we did it, while saving money, resources and protecting the soldiers the best we could.
This is not to say, that we cannot spare lives in the coming conflicts of China and Europe. But we have tried to construct the best possible weaponry for the conflicts, so that as many lives as possible are spared.
So I really think that the American media deserves to let me explain what actually went on. Not at least for the next generation of leadership to be prepared for their action.
G-d bless the will to act with precision and care for the men at arms.
Well, I know that mr. Trump sees the Middle East as a mess. Well, it has been a mess for the last 5000 years, ever since the first city of Eridu (Eden) was founded, then over all the fightings between the Assyrians and the Egyptians, the Hittitie (Iranians) the Babylonian (Iraqi), Jews, Christian, sea peoples, Muslims, Polytheist, French, English on and on it goes.
The Middle East has always been at war.
Bringing peace is a dream that has been harboured there since the beginning of time, an institution as the Messiah has been instituted, just to nourish the dream about peace.
What Obama and I tried, was much more complex and ambitious than tried ever before, and we did, albeit not perfect, get somewhere.
Israel has been strengthened, Iran has been strenghtened, Egypt has been strengthened, even Saudi Arabia has found a new more peaceful way.
Ok there are problems, Syria is a mess, the war in Yemen is a problem.
But the process of peace was initiated and still is actually going quite well.
The problem for the Middle East is not that it always fights, it is, that it is caught in the global competition between East and West, Russia and the US.
This feeds the hostilities, that would, otherwise be less toxic.
Seen from an international perspective, I think we should see the conflicts for what they are.
The conflict in Syria is a part of the Arab spring, the idea was to bring Democracy to the Middle East.
Seeing it from that perspective, I cant see why Assad cannot be a part of the solution. This however wont happen now, after mr. Trump has invested so much in his abdication.
So the conflict will continue to infest the relationship between the US and Russia.
My best advise is; think about peace, and how NOT to ruin all the treasures of the Middle East. What happened in Palmyra is a crime against humanity, the destruction of ancient mosques as well.
Do we really want that, or do we, as the heirs to the cradle of civilisation try to lift ourselves and reach a level that our ancestors found?
It will be difficult, but possible, if we search and understand our predecessors and ancestors, their ideas, and build upon them.
Think for ourselves, not for everybody else.
G-d bless the peace we will find in the face of another round of atrocities.
I have reflected a little on all the work mr. Obama and I have done in the international theatre of war, and where that leads to you mr. Trump.
First of all, international politics is very difficult, especially in a world where we are not progressing, but trying to stop the downfall.
It requires a bit of genius to treat this process in order to counter all the threats that there is. But it is possible.
First of all, you need to think about the cause. Fighting, giving your life for something, is not something taken lightly. Our men and women at arms are giving their life for something. That something in the US of A is the constitution, the “We the people”, and that again is democracy.
You can fly drones over far away lands, and you can act with the skill and tech that we have, but at the end of the day, morale, that is the will to fight, needs a cause.
So in the first term of mr. Obama´s tenure we fought for democracy in the north african countries. It was called “the Arab spring”. We won the fight, but we lost the peace.
This is why I think we should think about what comes after, from the beginning. If we want peace in Syria, then what is that peace, and how can we ensure that it follows our ideas as well.
The good thing about fighting for a cause, is the fact, that you gain natural allies. Of cause France, the second cradle of Democracy was all in on the Arab spring, and after that, they were in on the fight on ISIS. Because the fight against ISIS is actually the natural step after the Arab Spring. ISIS is the enemy that ruined the Arab spring. More or less. I know that we did a poor job of securing the peace, but IS were and are our enemies.
Now Russia and Syria are actually not against Democracy. Yes they are not perfect, but, all in all, they actually hold elections, believe in human rights, try to secure the wellbeing of all religions and so on.
So, even though we fight here and there, we are not natural enemies.
This is the way it is, and most enlightened commentators knows this, so it makes it very difficult to truly fight them. Because you need public support to do so, and you do not have that very much.
This leaves you with the two enemies that I and Obama have focused on in his second tenure; China and IS.
If you want progress, use the tools we have created. It is all prepared into the smallest detail, especially in Europe.
My aim has been to fight IS in Europe, and create a multitude of democracies in Europe after the fall of EU, which is imminent.
When the EU falls, there is ample opportunity to flex American muscle, and a lot of smaller countries who are in dire need of help against the uprising of the IS in Europe.
So I promise you success, if you see what strategy is on a political level. It is to make a one to one balance between ideology and struggle.
Unfurl that banner of Democracy again, keep the light of revolution burning.
That is what is the basic function of the presidentship, keep the light burning for all Americans to nourish from.
To understand what is really happening in the West, please let me take you back to a time when things actually did work.
A time that is almost forgotten today, but it actually made a lot of the present day administration.
The time was at the time of the sun king Louis XVI. He inherited a realm where he was the only power supreme, and he used it to build a realm that was, for its time; progressive, inventive, sure of itself, with a loyal citizenry. He was renown for his brilliance, and with that brilliance, he attracted other brilliant minds to work for him.
In a sense we can say, that the next French generation, the Republicans, owe him a great debt. Because even though Democracy was against the aristocracy, many of the thoughts that ended up in human rights and so on, was initiated in the progressive realm of the sun king.
If we compare this with today in Europe, we can see that the exact opposite is happening. Our rulers are pretty stupid, there is no progress just a slow decline.
Let us take a few examples; in order to build a realm the current leadership of the EU imported millions upon millions of migrant workers with very little skill and a mindset absolutely alien to the peoples of Europe.
Well, if the project was to unite the different european countries into one identity and culture, why make the differences even larger than what they were in the beginning?
That is not what you would call enlightened leadership, in fact it is very close to absolute stupidity, the result is given; chaos.
There are numerous examples of like decisions that is the opposite of genius, and has led to the chaos we witness now.
So what can we learn from that comparison? We can learn, that the progress of our predecessors were made by genius.
The enlightened and supreme leaders of Louis XVL made progress.
In fact, why is it that Europe has been so succesful in matters of civilisation before the second world war, because we had brilliant minds; Adam Smith, Voltaire, Condorcet, Kierkegaard, Hegel, Kant, Bohr, Maxwell, Newton.
That is what we can learn from the example, and that is also what we need to do to get out of the misery that we are in right now.
We need to strive for intellectual betterment, follow those academic stars, that illuminate our sky.
Here after Brexit, the hangover, intellectually, have, more or less, gone, and it is time for a new discussion on what comes next.
First of all, the networks of business that the UK has access to are huge, so what is really the problem. The Anglosphere is huge, and plenty of people to do business with.
Secondly there is the discussion on radical Islam. We need to start that.
Well, and then again, we have already been discussing that for many years, also in academic circles. I know that it is only fringe discussion, and that it has, all in all, been independent intellectuals like me, that have had the balls to do it.
But that fringe discussion should become mainstream.
We need to go from having no clue about what we are talking about, to actually look at the differences between our system and that of radical Islam.
First of all, I believe, that the ENTIRE system is at stake. As stated in the very name of ISIS, that is Islamic state. Radical Islam includes a state.
This state is in opposition to our state, the democratic state.
So the basic lines of aggression are in fact not religious but political.
This implies a lot of legal discussion, and exempts radical Islam from the usual protection granted to religions, since they, primarily see their work not as religious but political.
The other major point of discussion is that of humanism. We, as Europeans and beyond, belive in the sanctity of the individual. Of the beauty of each creature in the world, and this creatures worth.
That is not the case of radical Islam, women are raped, we have mass persecution of Christians, throwing gays off of rooftops and so on.
This is not humane. This is not good, this is a crime against all living.
This discussion and a much deeper discussion, is something we need to embark on.
This is why Oxford beckoned me, because I have taken that discussion for years, though they have been tabooed.
Science is about enlightenment, in the face of persecution, cowardy and darkness. Science and the light of democracy will only reach the shores of mankind, if we are strong enough, to lift that beacon of light.
G-d bless the will to lift the beacon of light, though we are opposed by so much, not least our own lack of courage.
First of all, looking at the long term strategic aims, that is first ISIS then China, not being friends with Putin is a bit of a problem.
We got beaten by you mr. Trump, and though mr. Putin did help you, maybe, the amount of cheating to get you in the White house is beyond Putin.
So, we in the Democratic wing should just suck it up, and get on with the necessary work that is rebuilding the Democratic platform.
We need to learn and revise our strategies.
This is difficult, and I admit, that we should be careful, but we still need to be clear on our basic objectives.
The reason why we fight ISIS is not because of some geostrategic goal, but because these bastards kill innocent children, make sexslaves and drive trucks into people.
The reason we fight China is because they are being pretty expansionist in west and are threatening our allies.
Mr. Putin can be turned both ways, if we attack him he will go with the Chinese, if we work with him he is our friend.
If you want action, don´t worry, action will come. In Europe, with China, and we need all hands on deck for that operation to run smoothly.
I would start helping mr. Mattis in his efforts on making Europe pay more. Because the security situation is really dangerous in Europe, and we should not bear all the expenses for that.
In the West, we need the same thing to happen; preparation for the coming war.
War is not something you do willingly. You do it, and you try to get it over with as fast as possible, not to be caught in the quagmire.
But you do it fast, and you have a clear exit plan.
Ok Donald, I am sorry, I should have been more focused on international politics. I have focused too much on national politics, but I thought that was important too.
What would I advice in this situation?
First of all, you had, contrary to everybody in the defense community in the US, actually a good rapport with mr. Putin.
That was ruined due to the infighting in the defense community with you.
I hope everybody sees now, that that was a good thing. That you wanted to make peace with mr. Putin.
Having a friend in Vladimir Putin will give the US two things:
1. Peace at the eastern front.
2. A good ally in the fight against ISIS.
The fact of the matter is, that albeit wrong, mr. Putin has, as yourself, become a kind of scapegoat for all the problems of the West.
That is factually wrong, and it is not good for the peacekeeping efforts of the world.
When mr. Medvedev calls out an international war, that is serious.
Do we really want to do that? Think about it; Europe in flames, nuclear warheads, weapons so powerful that they can destroy countries in a blink of an eye.
This is what we get if we keep scapegoating mr. Putin.
I think what I would do, was to follow your first idea, and make friends with mr. Putin. Hinder that war, and use your resources carefully in the true wars; on IS and perhaps of China.
That would be the wisest thing to do, and that would make you a tough man and a good friend.
Mr. Putin also did pay dearly to support you, as you did pay to support him.
He is your potential friend, use that in the interest of the US.
Because then you may just end up making America Great again.
That is what we are truly aiming at.
G-d bless the wisdom of strategical thinking. G-d bless the peace that is still possible.
The war efforts of the US is not going that well. I think that the US should decide who we are warring.
Is it China or is it Russia. We cannot fight both enemies. We can try, but we do not have the resources to do it.
I understand that mr. Trump needs a positive stance within the defense community, and, honestly it has started badly.
Mr. Trump needs to respect the traditions and ways of CIA, the navy, the infantry, the airforce.
Because these people are the best America has to offer, hands down.
On the other hand, we need some cooperation. If our infights leads to strategic decision that hinder the war overall, that is also a problem.
Mr. Trump has very little understanding on warfare, but he has one huge thing that he can contribute with. He is friends with mr. Putin.
In a situation where war with China i almost inevitable, that is VERY important.
The war with Russia is not a given, it is simply the traditions of the military and the prejudices of the public and others that leads to that.
The war with China is given. As sad as it is, it reminds me of the infighting between Phoenicia and Rome. The war came due to strategic interests not animosity.
There is another problem. And that is the fact, that a lot of the R and D has been targeted on China and the Islamists. If we really wanted to beat Russia, we should have invested much more in heavy weight equipment.
The drones swarms that is almost ready, is tailored to meet the threat of ISIS, not Russia.
We are, more or less ready to fight China in a year or two. Which, more or less is the pace the confrontation is building in.
So mr. Trump, do it like this, at least that is what I would do.
1. Call mr. Putin. Ask him how he sees it, and try to make amends, and find a way out of this mess. This is your decision, don´t let yourself be discouraged. He is your friend, and he will help you.
2. Try to make amends with the clandestine branch of the defense forces, and make them see China as a problem. They already do, but they need to use more resources on the bastards.
3. Get ready for the show down in Europe. The drone swarms are made for that, that is an easy win, and will project American power again in a humane way.
G-d bless the will to be smart on these things. G-d bless America.
There are a lot of talk about gender these days. Mr. Pence, vice president of the US has been hauled into a bit of a mess, discussion on his wife, and their relationship.
Let us see if we can disentangle ourselves from this mess that moderne gender roles have become.
On one side, there is the, often religious claim, that women are evil. So they have to be restricted and put down. This is prevalent in especially judaism, theoretically and islam.
At the other side, there is the moderne feminism that holds the same claim about men, that they are inherently evil.
Both claims are definitely wrong. Man is not inherently evil, but has a choice in life. Maybe some women are more prone to follow their feelings, and maybe some men are more prone to fight physically. However, both parties have a choice. We are born with a free choice to follow either a good or a bad course.
Family, or the unification of man and woman will not work, if we do not affect. The compromise in the daily live of the family is usually ethical. You give something of yourself to the family. Sacrifice yourself for the wellbeing of your children, or your spouse.
All communities only work if you sacrifice yourself to some degree for the common good.
This sacrifice however, should be ethical. That is, we need to think about the principles of the family. What is important. Is equality important? Is respect important? Is trust important?
Family life is ethical life, we strive for something better, together.
Take my own family. It is a mix of different backgrounds, my wife is a devout Christian, I am a devout Jew. She is a socialist. I am a conservative.
But we both agree on the principles of our family. And we have had a lot of problems due to my political life. But we still hold on to our little community, and we sacrifice ourselves.
Right now I sleep only six hours each night, my wife even less. But we see our little children flourish and get stronger. They are happy, so we are happy.
The sacrifice we make, we get it back a thousandfold, because of the happiness our family brings.
This attitude to the family as something above ourselves is where true happiness and equality are possible to realise.
It is also the answer to the crisis of too few children in the West, because when you have a family, then you wish to have more children. That is good.
I am totally shocked to hear about the terror attack in st. Petersburg. It is, without doubt, a terrible occurrence, and it is with the utmost humility and support from the Danish people, that I do hold the terrorist responsible for a vile attack on the Russian motherland.
This is wrong, and I do hope mr. Putin will hunt down those terrorist that we believe are a threat to the international community. Not at least mr. Putins country.
It seems to me, that we have come far in relation to mr. Trump. He is listening, if we let him.
One point I really do think we have to work together with him is economics. He has taken my ideas on production support and put it to good use.
If he does that, then there is an obvious area we can work together here.
Yes, that will give him a success, but if we support him. WE will actually share that success.
What is important however, is to understand what is going on in “Obamanomics”, the support of the production makers in the country.
The three words; made in America.
Therefor, I have added the economic policy ideas to my seminar, so that we, when I hopefully get over the US, can discuss the ideas in depth, and we can use these new good tools to turn the economy around.
When I initiated my attempt to strengthen European culture, including the US and Russia, it was in a clear understanding that the EU was in decline.
Now ten years after this analysis has been proved right. The EU has lost all credibility and is now not a positive force in the international development. Rather, all the policies that it has made are ripening with scary consequences, especially the multicultural project has had the opposite effect than intended.
The idea was to make a paneuropean citizenry that were not loyal to the nation states. Instead all the chaos it has brought has strengthened the nationalistic trends and created a new national identity that of the Umma, the muslim international state.
The European national state no one seems to care about, unless they are payed.
In this chaotic situation, what we need is not strife in-between the waning nationstates, but a strengthening where it makes sense. But not in the corrupt EU frame. But rather as a free cooperation between equal partners. We should work on rebuilding the nations in a peaceful cooperation.
We can have free trade, but we need a positive national identity in each nation.
At the same time, we need to start warring the Umma, the muslim nation-state that is a competitor to all the individual nation-states of Europe.
This fight or rather the fight against IS (islamic state) is a paneuropean and democratic fight.
When my great uncle went to the Faroe islands after millenia of subduement of the Faroe islands by Denmark, he went there with an escuse and a message of peace from the people of Denmark.
The people of Denmark met the people of the Faroe Islands on an equal footing.
This is democracy in practise. We call it “mellem folkelig” in Denmark. A mutual respect between equal peoples, equal folk.
The US should still be here as an ideal of a free people in a free state, but other states should be the same. Free peoples in free states.
Ok, I have finished a small seminar to the possible progress of the Democratic party.
First of all, we need to unite, not to be divided.
How do we do that? We do it by strengthening the core of the American Republic, the faith, values, what The Us of A is all about.
We need to start having faith in democracy, family, church, freedom again. Because there is a lot more that unites us than what divides us.
As they say; United we stand, divided we fall.
So the idea with the seminar is to inspire and build a base under these basic virtues of the US.
We philosophers gave you these ideas, we are still here to take care, that they still live and work in these days. These ideas are good and strong. It brings a better state, a better world, not a worse world.
So I pray, that you will take that burning torch that I have tried to make, and pass it on to others.
I have handed it on to my American friend and I hope that he can initiate something.
Well, you have the honour of the presence of the Danish PM these days. Thank you Donald. That was nice of you.
He is not much of a positive person in my book. He sacrificed all that was the initial virtues of his party Venstre on the altar of the EU. Venstre was built as a rebellion against the king, and fought, at the outset to give freedom to the farmers.
He has used most of his life to reverse that process by taking the freedom of the Danish citizens and handing it over to a corrupt supranational structure called the EU.
Talk about a turn around, in the wrong direction.
He still fights on with this, but ok, he is the best we have right now, even though that is not much.
But thank you anyway Donald, it is nice of you to invite him. We truly appreciate this gesture here in Denmark.
G-d bless the renewed and strong relationship between Denmark and the US.
We have to be honest about the build up of islamic state like fighters in Europe. We have had numerous incidents of terror but also findings of weapons caches in mosques.
As Erdogan said; the mosque will be the spearhead and the sword. Well as Hitler, if he says that, he probably means it.
I do not think that Erdogan is a lost cause, but I do think that, with the crisis we have had with him, we should start rebuilding our militaries. Because we may have a lot of humanistic doubt of our courses, but our enemies do not. They are dedicated and fierce.
So instead of using our money on the airforce or navy, we need to invest heavily in the infantry.
They should be grown from the current size to at least ten times more, if not even more. We also need to invest in high tech gear. The drones should be our top priority, but other high tech gear should be invested in. Like small armed vehicles that can enter urban areas and resist small arms as well as RPGs.
Israel has developed a system to go along with our tanks, I think it is called Triumph or something. That will protect our vehicles.
We also need to develop strategies to counter hostage scenarios as in the concert in France.
So, it is time to rebuild our forces, and we need to do it fast.
G-d bless the willingness to build on what we have.
After the attack on Westminster, one thing is clear. This problem will not be solved by more money, multiculturalism, inclusiveness or dialogue.
As I have said, numerous times, it is a war, and we are not even fighting it.
To act on this war, we actually have to WANT to fight it.
This requires a lot of thought, and a lot of planning, but it has to be done.
First of all, we need to reroute the migrants away from Europe to safe havens that we have created. But it has to be done effectively, not just haphazardly.
Secondly, we need to start investing in military to counter the threat. It is not just small, isolated groups, this is organized and it requires a lot of support logistically, morally and spiritually, if you can call killing innocents spiritual.
This is the demon in action, and we need to prepare, otherwise we are just lambs for the slaughterhouse. That is the truth.
So, as mr. Trump demands. We need to invest in defense capabilities, to defend our own people and land.
This should be targeted at the growing threat of Islamic State. So we need to prepare for a guerillawar with an opponent that uses horrorlike tools to cower us.
We need the spirit of mr. Churchill now. That is a will to fight. We need to use the Anglo-Saxon words, the strong words. We need to fight, on the beaches, in the shopping malls, in front of West Minster, we need to have courage and prepare for the worst.
Because England is under attack.
G-d bless the will to resist and be infinitely brave.
What is Israel really? To understand that, and truly remake the understanding of Israel. We need to reflect on the identity of Israel.
Israel was initiated as a Social-democratic state. After some time, as Socialism has vaned, Israel is now searching for a way to understand what Israel is today.
In this work, as a historical philosopher, I propose a look at what our forefathers thought about when they defined Jewish culture.
One item, or rather core item, of Jewish culture is the angels.
The angels are ancient spiritual beings, that reflect an ethical stance to the word.
They reflect judaism at its deepest levels.
Each angel has specific colours and characteristica. And through the understanding of what the angels represent, we can understand what juadism is, and thereby Israel.
Israel as a state demands more than just a little, it demands the best.
The best of all, are the angels.
Gabriel, the angel of strenght, Ophiel, the angel of beauty, Boel the angel of truth, Ravchiel the angel of compassion.
Each angel reflect the core of what it is to be jewish.With them we can be inspired to understand ourselves.
In France the contented ms. Le Pen is in trouble, why? Because the election platform is too narrow.
To fight islamism is good, to support your country is good. But a ticket to the Elysee has to be a bit broader.
I belive, that the antisemitic message is out, and now, hopefully, we can see a support of Israel, so I help.
Basically what you need Marine, is an economical plan to go along with the islamcritic message.
Here I propose the plan that I have developed with mr. Obama, and mr. Trump has used, at least in the beginning of his presidency.
The direct support to patriotic producers. At the same time free markets should be supported, not with unhealthy ideas, but as a principle.
Money comes with rich people supporting you. Rich people support those they like. Some even do not support anybody but themselves. But usually they pay back for what they have gotten.
This is a problem in France. The industry does not fight for a patriotic cause, but are just a globalised as everybody else.
This should be turned around. Not by negative means, but by help and inspiration. Napoleon installed some good ideas in his first 100 days. One of them the civil code, that is a deep thank you from the republique to those who served.
The same can be done with the producers that is supporting their country.
By this, you also, directly support some of the workers who have been left by globalisation, having no jobs.
So it is an economic plan that will support your core voters directly.
G-d bless the beautiful France and may he live for another thousand years.
I have been given the opportunity to find a remedy for the liberal trouble in the US. With one of my good friends, I will make a small seminar with a powerful message.
It is my hope, that I will be able to turn the downfall of the Liberals around.
It is all about one thing; new ideas.
Barack and I worked a lot on many ideas in his presidency, so we will revisit them, and find the best to propel us forward.
G-d bless the will to be strong as the world is changing.
Things are starting to move in England. As political correctness is faltering, the debate about the trouble and the failure of multiculturalism is starting.
About time one should perhaps notice.
Ideas that are wrong should be criticised, and new ideas should come instead. But at the end of the day, this day of mourning because of the terrible threat of violence should be used for something concrete and specific.
That being; an open discussion on the issues.
Not talking about something wont solve it, talking about it may just give you a tool to fix the problem.
Now the UK will never be the same, but it can be better, in the sense, that a renewed discussion on the true cause of the terrorist attacks can give you answers. And by those answers you can fix the problems you have.
There is still time, you can fight back. You have the means, all you need is the will.
Find that, and you will be saved.
G-d bless England, as you still have friends, and all hope is not lost yet.
France is overrun by extremism; left-wing extremism, right-wing extremism and islamism.
In this difficult hour, it is time to relive what France is. Is it a weak and sick old man, or is it a beautiful country with traditions of the roman era, of the men of north, the spirit of Isis; Paris.
Now I truly believe, that it is time for the great warriors of France, the patriots, to rise and bear arms. Not to make a negative mark upon France, but to make a positive mark on France.
Fight for something beautiful, something that will make this wonderful place live for another thousand years.
I believe, that the patriots, should shed all the negative influence from Nazism, the Madam Blavatsky ideas, and start to look at the other side.
At the angel of Michael, the light bringer, to bring light to France again. To see it, to understand it to relive the valiant cry of Roland.
This is what France is, and what is at stake.
Good things, things of value, things that will have to be used to be alive.
But most important of all. I believe, that there is a great, great idea that must now be fought for, that we must rise up for. That idea of the Republic, that idea of Democracy, threatened by barbarism and islamism.
Only if the great sons and daughters rise to the occasion, and shout! At the top of their lungs for France, will we see her for another day.
G-d bless the beautiful France, and may we live to see her again. Par Isis, Paris.
In the current conflict between migrants and Europeans, we have two choices, or rather, I suppose we mostly have already chosen.
We can either chose to confront this conflict as an ethnic conflict or as a political conflict.
In Sweden the current environment, which is absolutely devastating, the conflict will, most probably, be ethnic. As in Yugoslavia, Swedes will band together with Swedes and other ethnic groups likewise.
There might be a religious superstructure to the migrants to chose from, that is an islamic identity and rule. But we will see.
The effect of this development will be like Yugoslavia, some areas will end up muslim, other areas will end up Serbian or the like.
If we, however, chose to see the conflict as a political conflict, that is a fight between democracy and islamism, the development will be qualitatively different.
The ethnic element will still be there, because democracy is a traditional value for most Europeans, but many migrants will be given a way to find loyalty to their new countries.
This also gives the current states an opportunity to survive. If the migrant crisis explodes into ethnic violence, the states will not survive, but new states will appear as a result of the turmoil.
The philosophical and ideological strength that follows in the footsteps of a revolution, that is a democratic revolution, within the frames of the current system, will make the tackling of the problems much more civilised, and thereby much less violent.
That is my plan, and has been all the time. That is why I have founded the democratic, republic wave that rides over Europe these days. Because it will be the wisest, and hopefully the least violent. But the air is pregnant with war, let us hope the war will be within some frames of civility, otherwise Europe will really end up in a bloodbath.
G-d bless the willingness to fight for a positive system.
These days there is a lot of problems politically in the US. The left is trying to undermine the right, and the right really hates the left. Not always, and sometimes it is right, and so on. But the country is split into two warring factions, that do not compromise or try to work together.
Politics will not work well under such conditions, what we need is to reach across the aisle, try to bury the hatchet and compromise.
As I see it, both camps have a lot of truth in their stance. On one hand, the liberal part is truly scared about the possibility of a constitutional meltdown. On the other hand the conservative part is truly worried about the possibility of a moral meltdown.
In fact both parties are right. They see the problems of the other part, and are right in their criticism. I however truly believe that the process of reconciliation is to try to be open to the criticism of the other part, and use that to reflect on our own faults.
We are all sinners, and it is only if we are humble about our own misgivings, that we can reach a compromise.
Yes, I do believe, that the southern borders should be fortified and migrants should use the official channels to enter the US. Yes, I do believe, that America should be strong again. Honestly, I have worked tirelessly on this for many years.
But I also believe in humanity and humbleness, in respect for spirit. In fact, I believe that without humbleness one cannot be strong, because humbleness will give you the ability to reflect on your sins.
Mr. Trump asked me to guide him, I believe I have stayed true to that. So in this spirit of understanding, we need to unite. Because as mr. Breibart said, E Pluribus Unum, in manifold are we united.
G-d bless the great Nation of United States of America.
I am hopefully going to the US, maybe on behest of the conservatives or the liberals, but there is one thing that I have really realized the last few days.
You need to start, or restart your tradition of philosophy in the US. I mean, I will be happy to be a surrogate for some time, but this will only work for some time, untill that I am no more or something unforseen happens.
The founding fathers were all philosophers, but it seems to me, that the tradition, more or less, stopped with them. Who are the philosophers of today, one may ask.
A country cannot do without a tradition of brilliant thinkers founded in the greek classical time. We have a function to play for democracy.
This is really the core of the problem, or why the US has felt lost, because the tradition has died out.
Perhaps we can rekindle this tradition? It is not easy, it takes a lot of altruistic work of many people to make a frame on which a philosopher of two can emerge. But it is possible.
In Denmark the tradition has been going on for a thousand years, more or less. So there are a lot of predecessors and illustrious minds to learn from.
But for a nation to make room for philosophers, a certain prestige should be given the calling.
It is a very elevated position, and a position that demands the utmost of the person who so desires to be a philosopher. It also demands an extreme ambition, and a solid education, preferably on an elite university.
In essence it is an aristocratic pursue, so it needs good strong families to both support good universities, and a yearning of learning in the intellectual aristocracy.
But it can be done, if the universitites and the old families are willing to.
Maybe even a renegade like me can get the honor, if he works hard enough.
G-d bless the willingness to be strong in intellectual pursuit.
I truly believe, that I am a good person. I might not be perfect, who are? But I have always tried to look at the world, and do what is good.
Doing good is somehting philosophers have discussed for millenia. Aristotle claims that good is a final epitomic virtue called happiness. Plato talks about the good, the beautiful and the true is the same.
I believe that both are right, but there is more to it. For me, I can say, that it is often something about a feeling that I get.
I remember when I was in Salvador fifteen years ago. I am a dancer, and we ended up there with my dancegroup.
Salvador is an evil city. When we walked the streets there, we were met by people who wanted to sell small children for sex. There was a lot of violence, darkness hiding in the corners.
In contrast to this, there was also cultural groups that were good, and a few writers. But the city of sin is not only Rio de Janerio it is as much Salvador da Bahia.
When I worked in IT I made a lot of money, but I ended up leaving the business, because there were so much darkness in the business. The companies cheated the customers. Whole schemes of how to make money on customers, without really giving them anything.
Now, I am in politics, and there is also a lot of corruption there. Too much it seems sometimes. In Denmark they continously try to shut me down, they call me all kinds of names, and believe that I am “controversial”. When it is controversial to confront the sins of your country, then we are truly in trouble.
But what is goodness really? Apart from the philosophical discussion, I also, deep in my heart, believe that goodness is a sense. You can feel it, if you are tuned to goodness, if your are tuned to spirit.
Helping a friend is good, being honest is good, trying to support your family is good, helping your country.
Bottom line, to be a good person will lead you to a better live, and may save religion. But it will also give you many enemies, especially those who are full of sin.
Well, I have wanted to go to Oxford again, and it is a bit of a challenge. I got sidestepped because the Americans showed interest, but still I want to go to Oxford.
I have given it a bit of thought. I know, that from the outside I am seen as a bit of a wild creature. I am out here fighting the wildlings waving my wand, sending off spell after spell.
But there is another side of me, that I have not had the opportunity to show the world. That is me as a truly civilised person.
I know that when fight in the wild, it seems all hair, swords and burning wands, but when I am at a school, I am another person.
My own school Vallekilde, that is the equivalent to Oxford in Denmark, was founded by my great-grandfather Ernst Trier. He was the leading intellectual at his time.
Then there has been many leading academics and artists in my family. Like the van Gogh family is the leading artist family in Holland, Trier is the same here in Denmark.
What I am trying to say is, you should definitely not worry that I will misbehave or start doing things at the school. On the contrary, I come there because I like to teach.
I really miss teaching, and besides from Vallekilde there are no other place I would rather like to teach than Oxford.
I feel like drawn to that place somehow, I cant explain it.
But here comes the agenda that I would like to propose, and hopefully we can make it happen.
G-d bless the will to do good, and save the Anglican church.
It is with a great shame, that I see, that the Turkish government are not able to discern between their own government and that of a foreign government.
If turkish citizens happen to be in the Netherlands or in Germany. Then they are not entitled to any part of the democratic waving of Turkey.
If they wish to be a part of Turkey, well, they are free to go and live there. Otherwise they are entitled to nothing and should follow the rules of the country that they are guests in.
Hereby I wholeheartedly support Holland, may you be strong in this difficult time.
So, in my attempt of helping the UK, the development of my little seminar has so far been, that the conservatives in the US are interested. Imagine that.
I have given a little thought to that, and honestly I think that that is a good thing. Ideas are free in the sense, that I do not own them, and anybody can use them as they want.
But to reiterate, my attempt to support the Democratic part of the American political life, I have made something for you as well.
It may not seem as much, but it is the best that I can do at the time. If you want, I would be happy to come over, and try to discuss some of the issues that has been at the center of my work with Mr. Obama. Thereby keeping his light alive.
For me it has always been very important to unite the country and not contribute to a fragmentation. So I sincerely believe, or rather it is my ardent hope, that my work will be a work of continuous reconciliation. Therefor I am really happy that the conservatives are open as well.
In practise, there is a problem about funding. Currently there is none, so to make a trip possible, a small amount of funding needs to be found somewhere. Just the plane ticket and perhaps a welcoming home somewhere, that is all that is needed.
The seminar is attached below, and you can see, that I have tried to touch on some of the main issues that has been up in the presidency of Mr. Obama. The angle could be changed depending on who will invite me. I hope it is parts of the political establishment, and the media including bloggers.
It is not a competition on who gets me first. I will be fair, and I will not prioritize someone over others. All are truly welcome.
That said, if you want to invite me. Please send a mail, and I will be happy to respond.
G-d bless, and may we find a new path in this life, that will guide us to a better world.
There seems to be a lot of discussion and demoralization on the liberal side these days. It is understandable, but it is also a bit embarrasing.
At the end of the day, it seems to me to be a kind of regression. The positions of the 68 are celebrated, and the new ideas Barack and I put forth are kind of closed down.
I understand it, but it is not that efficient when it comes to real live politics.
Around ten years ago, I had this moment of truth in Denmark. It was at my local gym, and there a few migrants were pretty open about their experiences with Danish girls. As they said; over 40 Percent of them had been raped. That being their friends in their local youth club.
You can look at it many ways, but compare this to slavery. When Thoreau fought against slavery, he simply could not see how slaves could be treated like subhumans. North America went to war for that. Because it was wrong. Seen from a humane perspective, the problem is the pain that the slaves suffer in their imprisonment.
So it is the amount of pain that sanctified the civil war of the US. A rape is worse, when a girl is raped, the pain and the suffering will never cease. The trauma is too deep. The enslavement has been internalised, and the person afflicted will never be free and happy again. They can learn to live with it, but their lives have changed forever.
This was what Oriana Fallaci saw when she fought the islamists after she had fought the fascists. The inherent slavementality that is in islamist thinking.
My point is, political progress or development should not be anchored in theories about the world. It should be anchored in the concrete wrongs of the world. What is happening in the world, done by human beings, felt by human beings.
When something is obvious, and has been like that forever, it is hard to change course. But liberation of women is not about getting through the glass ceiling or black womens concieved problems. It is the rapes.
The rapes by a oldfashioned, evil, maledominating, patriarchal, disgusting philosophy that has no reason to be here on earth. And just as the civil war was fought over slavery, this fight againt IS, and yes also the Muslim Brotherhood, is about that same thing. That is inhuman acts.
G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in opposition to defamation of women, and hapy womens liberation day.
The basic problem of Westerne thought is the downfall of German metaphysics. In the aftermath of the second world war, the intellectuals of Germany were more concerned with peace work, than with building edifices of metaphysical thought. Still there are interesting things happening in Germany, but the tradition of Prussia is almost lost.
Almost, because there is a small vestige of that Kantian wisdom that was spread from Prussia in Denmark. We are kind of all that is left of the halls of metaphysics of Königsberg.
When something is lost, it is possible to rebuild, if you work hard and focused enough. It is possible to keep that amazing school of German thought alive, if we support it.
If we do not, it will die. If we do, there is a possibility to live a life of Göethe, Hegel and Kant again.
I am working quite hard on my metaphysical ideas these days. Finally I have a little energy for that. The persecution has vaned some, and my situation has stabilised to some degree.
This I hope will make it possible for all that understands the need of German/Danish thought to be renewed, to take up that baton, and let it on.
Metaphysics is only dead, if we accept it. If we do not accept it, it will live on.
Ok, it is pretty sad, that I did not succeed in my project that was to make a peace between Democrats and Republicans. I tried, and as mr. Trump said right after he was elected. He needed the guidance of Obama.
Well, I am still here, and I will try my best to soothe the hot tempers and play a constructive role. We need to try to unite, and not be divided.
Politically it is possible, but in the facts of the ground work it is not.
But I will try and remain a staunch proponent of unity.
Dirty tricks are, unfortunately a part of politics. Alinsky says it quite openly in his book about politics. If you enter politics, you need to be ready for the punches.
In Europe, it is the same. Persecution, vilification, sometimes even physical threats.
This is why I really admire ms. Hillary Clinton, she is one of the toughest politicians I have ever worked for. Her example is pretty good when it comes to overcoming adversity. She did not win, because mr. Trump is also a pretty good fighter. We must give him that. But she had a good way of getting over all the slander and negative attacks.
One of the worst attacks was just before the first convention, where all the ideas are presented and things start for real. Wikileaks tried to derail the process by publicising some things that ms. Hillary had done wrong. Or I believe it was her secretary.
That is a vile attempt to derail her political process, what she did was admirable, and what convinced me to help her. She fired the person that had done something wrong, and then she just went on fighting.
Turning that attack around must have been a bit of a difficulty. The election process was so tiring.
The same is what happens in France now with ms. le Pen, the EU is trying, with dirty tricks to influence the election. Well, it is equal to what Wikileaks did. It is illegal, but everybody does it, especially if you work with information, and you do not have a direct voice in the election.
But the example of Hillary shows us, that what you do is; fight on. Fight on, and you can actually turn things around.
In the current democratic elections, there are specifically two adherents to my prodemocratic philosophy. Mr. Wilders of the Netherland, and ms. le Pen of France.
I support you, and not only do I support you. I wholeheartedly believe that you are the future of Europe.
Remember the idea behind my philosophy is not a negative, it is a positive. You strive for SOMETHING that something being freedom and the republic.
It is much more than a simple fight against the barbarity of the islamists, it is a fight for the philosophical principle of your state.
That being an illuminated democracy. A way for human beings to live in harmony amongst each other. A dream of a nation that is free and just.
G-d bless the will to be honest in the face of the onslaught of both the EU and the political correct. G-d bless, and now FIGHT!
Sweden has wanted to be a humanistic country. With this, I really feel that we have a common understanding.
In Denmark, I am widely vilified, especially by the other humanists. They see me as a rogue.
But as the LEADING humanist, I believe that they are simply too shallow in their understanding of the current conflicts. Like my predecessors Poul Henningsen and Georg Brandes.
It is called the “supreme enlightenment”. Supreme enlightenment must mean that it is elevated above something.
Elevation can only be, if you are somehow better than something else. In fact, I see my humanistic enlightenment philosophy as above the rest. I truly believe, that I have understood the problems that we face better than my fellow humanists.
Where we differ are in two points. First it is in the handling of Islam. Secondly it is in the understanding of nationhood.
Let us consider the first point. I have never targeted ALL of Islam, but the part that has gone full force on the medieval version of Islam. That is; world domination, killing of heathens, rape as a method of warfare, extermination of innocents Yazidis and so on. What we have come to define as islamists, and the entire world, even other muslims are fighting it around the world.
I believe that the world has proved me right.
Secondly. Nationhood is mentioned in the hermetic scriptures that I have read, over and over and over again. Egypt this, Egypt that, Egypt, Egypt, Egypt. Humanism adores the nation of Egypt.
In fact humanism, in its original form, SUPPORTS the nation.
There is an intricate balance in the philosophy of checks and balances that work within a nation. Going Diogenetian and become a citizen of the world does not work with humanism. You have to choose either, and in fact, Diogenes ended up as a slave, because he lost all his money and had nothing to protect him. All humans need a nation.
So far my solution is the MOST humane that I have possibly could figure out. War is terrible, especially a war with an enemy that finds rape as a tool acceptable. So we need to realise, that if and when we fight, atrocities are a part of fighting. The difficult thing in a fight is to keep the professional and humane attitude to the fight, and not engage in mass slaughter and extermination of the opponent.
Therefor my solution has been to repatriate migrants that have entered Europe. This solution keeps the fighting to a minimum, and leaves both parties alive.
G-d bless the will to find humane solutions to difficult problems.
When we talk about enlightenment, we, as I have lectured about, end up in Egypt with the Egyptian sun g-d Ra.
But enlightenment is greater than just the fight between light and darkness. Ra had an opponent, the G-d Apap. Apap that is depicted as a snake is defined by darkness and chaos.
Ra is defined as light and order.
This is a reminder of what light ALSO is. It leads to order. Darkness leads to chaos.
We can see it in very closed organisations as the EU. The EU is made as a closed system, where armies of bureaucrats define the welfare of the citizens.
What is the most obvious state of EU; chaos.
The currency the euro has led to chaos, the open borders policy has led to chaos, the migration policy has led to chaos. In fact, this is what the populace is really so angry about in Europe. That wherever EU takes decision, chaos comes.
The mechanics of this is pretty obvious. When the eurocrats decide something without any serious discussion, the usuals checks and balances that is in a democracy or an aristocracy has been dismantled. Therefor decisions that usually would not be possible to take in an open society is taken, and chaos comes.
So we have a definition on certain principles or mechanical structures that a society needs to have to work. Transparency and order.
Why is it then, that these things are important?
Seen from a metaphysical point of view, I still can’t figure it out. I can see it works like that, but why?
That is a philosophical question of the grand scale.
I believe that I am pretty much spot on in regards to the strategies that I have developed for the US.
The Americans are not ready for a prolonged battle on the ground losing too many soldiers. Yes a few here and there, but there is no support for a huge campaign.
There is also a priority when it comes to targets. The targets have to be evil, guntoting islamists to really make sense to the public.
Where American lives however are possible to give is in Europe. As the conflicts are heating up, the fight will eventually end up in Western Europe.
To redirect resources to this fight within NATO makes sense, and the fighting will start perhaps tomorrow or rather at any true given point. We need to be ready for that. Because this fight will be pretty bad.
G-d bless the sacrifices our brave people in the revolutionary wing of the United States of America. May they spread the light of Democracy.
When we talk about enlightenment, we need to go to the true source of its inception to really understand what it is.
Enlightenment is truly a reflection of the faith in the sun as a G-d.
Its inception is in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis, or the city of light. So we are in Egypt, and in its world of G-ds and G-ddesses.
What is an Egyptian G-d? It is usually an animalistic representation of a natural principle. So Ra, the sun god is a hawk. Since somehow the Egyptians found that the hawk represents the rays of the sun.
So in essence, illumination is the principle of light that we believe in.
At a given time, light was equaled to truth, so that illumination to men is the spread of truth as the light.
This connection between light and truth I honestly do not know when came or how it makes a theoretical connection.
But I do know, that it happened somewhere in Egypt in ancient times.
After that seeing truth as light is proven empirically over and over again. In politics, journalism, religion and human matters in general.
How to make enlightenment work has become an art, even though it usually does not work.
You can see it in my example where society persecutes me, or rather the police persecutes me for bringing too much light into the society.
The police is tied with chains as big as they can get NOT to chain me. It is in their education. It is in the constitution and so on and so forth. Nevertheless, still they do not obey the rules but keep on coming. It does not work, or rather in this case, with the danish system it did not work, to the shame of Denmark.
Nonetheless, at a metaphysical level, the discussion is; what is light, and how do we understand this natural force in the context of society.
G-d bless the willingness to understand things at a deeper level.
Sweden is in trouble, deep, deep trouble. I think that everybody realises this.
The problem is, what do we do about it?
First of all, there is one item of discussion that has some merit to it.
The idea of humanism. To be a humanist, you are entitled to one specific virtue, above them all. Enlightenment. You are, first and foremost, sworn to seek truth be it dangerous or not.
This is what enlightenment is all about, and that is much more important than care taking of the planet and treat people as individuals.
This is the problem with Sweden and the rest of the Scandinavian Socialists countries. The idea of searching and looking for truth has been dismantled in the tyranny of the minorities.
We have to be honest about the terrible things that migrants do to the native population. Otherwise we are NOT humanists.
It is a balance. You can only be caretaking of the weak and of each individual, if you, at the same time, are able to look at all moral actions.
The more freedom you give people, the more you must enforce the hard regiment of truth seeking.
Because the liberty of the individual will also give room for moral degration and outright evil.
That is why we say, that on the eve of the Apocalypse the terribly strong angel Michael will arise and blow in his horn for all the fighters of light. Fighting the sons of darkness.
You have lived in darkness, you need to open your doors and windows and eyes for what is happening in Sweden, as Denmark and Norway have to do the same.
This is in order to find out what is truly right and wrong in these things.
When you let people from the most war torn and evil places in the world into your country, there is a possibility that they will take their way of thinking with them. If they do, and start acting like they have done in their home country, they are wrong and evil. Simple as that.
You need to be true humanists in the true sense to turn the boat around.
It will be hard and painful, but humanism is not easy or a walk in the park. It goes against all that is easy and corrupt. It is painful to look truth in its eyes, but it is what humanists do.
G-d bless the ability to be free in thinking and understanding.
It has come to my knowledge, that my good friend has been accused of blasphemy.
He burned the Koran, and as a consequence, he has been charged by the state with disregard and lack of respect for Islam.
Well, remember ten years ago, when the entire muslim world burned Danish flags. Remember that?
This is precisely the same. We Danes do not accept, that some supergovermental body finds it appropriate to enlarge our population with some of the most extreme islamist in the world.
WE DO NOT ACCEPT IT!
And you can prosecute, persecute, put us on a stake, vilify us, RAPE OUR DAUGHTERS!
But WE WILL NOT BEND to your corrupt, dishonourable ideas that TAKES AWAY OUR FREEDOM TO EXPRESS OURSELVES. We will stand and fight, from here on and to whenever is the end.
Well, being a musician, I often think about the former intellectual leaders of the world, because they were themselves musicians. Bob Dylan, Niel Young, David Bowie, Savage Rose here in Denmark and so on.
What is it really that has changed from the rule of the musicians to now?
First of all, the media has changed. Before it was music, that was radio, festivals, young people listening to their favourite band in their teenage dystopia.
Now it is blogs, blogs, blogs. Breibart, Afpixlat, Uriasposten, Milo Yannopoulis, my blog.
That is; written words. The best blogs out there, to my mind, are the outcasts of the society. The people that never really made it in the mainstream because they were too rebellious, too different, to ethical.
What drives a blog is not money or fame. Neither is usually the product of your vast labour. But a sincere and true urge,or rather fire, to do good.
A pure ethical rage.
What makes a blog succeed, especially a political blog, is depth, sincerity, ability to write and then just the gruesome work of feeding your blog, day after day, after day.
So the few people who actually succeed in the blogosphere are usually a certain rare hippie kind of type, who are willing to sacrifice all for the sake of humanity.
The idealist.
So we come from a world, where the intellectual leaders of it had tons of money, a lot of easy attention, and well… a rock star status. To a world where the intellectual leaders are suffocation from all kinds of persecution and ridicule, live a life of misery and makes absolutely no money.
This is a huge change, because the kind of persons who are attracted to the blogosphere are different from the persons who are attracted to the music world.
The nerds are ruling again.
Before the second world war, that is before all of the world went into ashes. The world was moved forward by writers. Not journalists, but, true book producing writers. Marx, Voltaire, Kierkegaard, Hegel, Göethe, Newton and so on.
These people were much more altruistic than the bloggers, and deeper.
So we have come to a kind of middle ground between the musicians and philosophers of before the industrial revolution.
I do strive to be like my ideals, but I also admit, that I am not. I could be, if I was able to write books again. But my living conditions simply do not allow me to do so. I have to make money for my family, and at the same time write here on Rubicon.
But I suppose, that is just how the world is today. No time for writing books as an intellectual, and only time for blogging.
It is off cause better than what it used to be, but I still long back to the times where the world was driven even more by very, very deep thought.
G-d bless the will to understand the world and make it better.
Now, there are a lot of discussion on how to tackle the islamists.
First of all, we have a good strategical case, but it is not easy.
We have kind of left the war weariness of the Bush era. That was due to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Two very costly wars in terms of manpower, lives and money.
War is much more than power struggle. It is lives on the ground. Our soldiers pay a heavy price for the fighting, ruined lives, and sometimes the highest price.
So we owe them an honest discussion on the costs of war.
On the other hand, it is pretty obvious that the islamists are openly threatening not only the U.S. but the rest of the West and East as well.
The megalomania is pretty obvious, but their prowess on the ground is pretty impressive.
First of all, what is, to my mind, extremely important, is to recognize that it is the Muslim Brotherhood that is behind most of the islamist movements. IS is just one of the branches.
This makes it a bit more easy to recognise our allies in the Middle East.
First and foremost, in this fight, Egypt. Egypt is actively fighting the Muslim Brotherhood and IS as well. Supporting them, with all we have, is a no brainer.
We should like to see some development in terms of human rights and enlightenment. But that is in the interest of Egypt as well, since human rights is an Egyptian tradition. Humanism comes from Egypt.
The Ankh and the care taking of the human come from Heliopolis. The city of light.
Secondly Germany is an essential ally. Germany is recognising the importance of fighting islamists in general, because it is beset with a lot of them.
So an Egyptian/German axe would make sense.
What we do not need is for all of Sunni islam to go Apocalyptic. So here again Egypt is a force that draws in the right direction, not to mention that the great islamic university Al Azhar is in Egypt. Egypt also has a tradition of not vilifying Christians.
If we see the fightings inside of the Middle East, and are willing to pick our sides with wisdom, we will be seen as a Middle East player at the level of the rest of the players. Right now we are seen as an external force.
It is important to know your enemy as you know yourself.
We are not really into Middle East lore, but we could be, and that would lift some of the heavy weighting without us using physical force.
The Middle East is the birth cradle of the civilisation of man. They are still extremely proud of that, as they should be. If we manage to see them as they truly are, and handle them with due respect, we can perhaps play a more civilised and enlightened role in the conflict.
When we talk about HOW to strategise. I believe we should see our enemy as they are. They are much different from us, but they have their beliefs and ideals. We find them wrong, but we should not let us be fooled by the fact that they see it as right.
We should also discuss their new strategies, that is guerrilla warfare with drones added to it.
They got that from me, and are serving them quite well. I just hope, that our side has learned as well.
Sending in grunts WITHOUT the umbrella of high tech drones would cost a lot of lives.
We need to strategize wisely here, and look at the exit strategy as well as the next steps of the war.
The war is moving to Europe, and we have to be ready for that.
We are working on changing NATO to meet this threat, but we need to see the war as it will come. The new development of NATO should include gurreillawarfare in cities.
In fact, most of the fighting should be redirected to that aim. This will, in practise, mean; grunts on the ground, controlling small and large drones with reconnaissance capabilities and the ability to enter houses and deliver a payload.
Europe is entering one of those hells it has been in so many times. We need to be ready to get it over with as fast as possible.
G-d bless the willingness to be honest and strong.
To truly understand the way of the world. One could understand the way power works.
As a political player for some ten years now, I have begun to understand, that what drives the world is the METHOD people use to gain their say.
There are different approaches.
The most base is the way of violence. Some call it war, some call it “the rule of the strong”. At this very basic level people use fear to push their agenda.
That is why we have law. To suppress the rule of the strong, and protect the weak.
At the next level, we have the method of leverage. This method is usually used in criminal organisations and secret services. They ensure that they “get something on you”, and then pressure you to bend to their wills.
This method is off cause basically criminal and corrupt, and it does not work on people who are ethical and want to change the world to a better place.
That is why it is extremely annoying to be at the hard end of the secret service here in Denmark, because they insist not only on their urge to control, but more insidiously on applying their METHOD on my life. If and when I accept their ideas, they have corrupted me. That is a danger.
The third level of power brokering is networking. That is how politics works. You are as powerful as the extent of your network. The closer you get to the center of the network, that is the prime minister, the more powerful you are.
The political players, they give you access to the network at the level of your perceived power as such. Or rather, you get power the more you succumb to flattery and other types of sycophantic behaviour. That is why you see all the most disgusting intellectuals in represented in the media and other places of intellectual interest. They are there because they are good at “networking”.
The most powerful method of power brokerage is however neither of the above. The most powerful player of all, is the person who fights for a cause.
The political player that wants to do good, and has a righteous cause.
Ethics is at the bottom of his political warfare.
Usually these creatures are rare. They are one in a million, the other players succumbing to the other means of power brokering.
Nonetheless, the thing is, only if the few idealists truly survive and thrive in a corrupt environment will democracy survive.
The more corrupt a state is, the less breathing room is there for the enlightener.
Sweden is in a lot of trouble. BUT it is truly possible to turn the tide. If Sweden wants.
First of all, it is about realising the MORAL content beneath the conflicts we are witnessing right now.
On one side, we have civilisation, at the other side we have chaos.
Not all migrants are chaotic, but some are. These migrants have different motivations for their chaotic behaviour, some are just mean people, others are POLITICALLY driven.
It is extremely important to categorise each problem and act accordingly.
Sweden is not weak. It is just off trail.
In 68 ts, Sweden went all in on American liberalism. A philosophy deeply engendered with some false flag ideas. Dont get me wrong, there were, and is a lot good ideas in the American tradition. Among them Thoreau and his ideas of nonviolence. But the Franfurterschool that came with the same batch was not good, and that is what is wreaking havoc on Sweden now.
What you need to do. Is to follow and especially follow Germany.
Germany has picked up my ideas of solving the problems with mass migration. That is repatriating all the non aligning migrants. That is migrants that are in category one or two.
Germany needs help in this process, and Sweden could team with Germany and work together.
Nonetheless, you have to do it NOW.
This is not racist or against minorities. This is FOR democracy. Because if you get too many migrants in, that despise the law and the right to free speech, then there is no more democracy.
Nevertheless, you have to move in a fast manner.
You can do this, with all your ability as organisers, and critical system understanding.
You are good at so many things, use this to save Sweden.
G-d bless the will to be swift and honest in ones approach.
There has been a lot of discussion of the media and its role in a modern democracy.
I have been at the negative end of the Danish media for around ten years, so naturally this has had som implications on my own existence as a writer and as an intellectual.
But seen in a historical view, we may be able to see what is coming.
When media was initially invented, as a part of the French Revolution. It was a tool of enlightenment. The idea was, that lies and secrets was an enemy to the Republic.
These ideas stem from a humanistic ideology represented, among other things in the Statue of Liberty, that the U.S. got from France.
The next great step in media development was in the workings of the Nazi media. Goebbels was master in MANIPULATING the public. He devised a decrepit and destructive system where Jews and other enemies of the German state were depicted as evil animals. Propaganda was born.
Contrary to most public opinion, these tools of statecraft did not die with the nazies, but lived on in the Soviet Union. In the Soviet Union, the propaganda was put to good (bad) use.
Somehow in the 68 generation, they sucked up the ideas in some form in the West, and it has been a part of the way media operate in the West since.
To be honest, the western media is a mix of French Revolution ideals and Nazi ideas.
How does this manifest?
It manifests in the LACK of covering certain issues that the socialist media deem off limit. That is mainly migration, Islam, Nationalism and so on. If you touch these areas, the media will often react with cutting you off.
At the same time it still tries to tackle corruption in the state and so on. So it is not all corrupted and influenced by nazi ideas. But only half.
So what happens now?
Let me give you an example.
When the Russians won the war over Nazi Germany, they accidentally killed a lot of civilian Germans at the east front, simply because the civilians DID NOT KNOW that they were coming. The Nazi media had kept them in the dark about it, and continued feeding the public lies about the way the war went.
So not until the Germans could actually hear the Russians coming did the consider fleeing.
This is truly how propaganda works, by EMITTING certain truths that is deemed unwanted for the public. Putting a lid on and so on.
But as happened to the Soviet Union, the reality on the streets became so different to what the media purported, so people realized they have been lied to. Or people start getting news in other ways.
Now BOTH mechanisms are working against the media agenda. In Europe, the happy multicultural Eden is not exactly appearing, and the Internet has brought a hitherto unknown freedom of expression.
Now you can scream as much as you want, if people can get their news from other sources than what they are used to, they will.
Here the media has a huge problem. The ambivalence between French Revolution ideals of free speech, and the Nazi ideals.
On one hand they buy into the Socratic ideals, at the other hand, these ideals lead to a problem in stopping the competition from blogs.
The infiltration of universities and media simply does not work anymore.
Propaganda still work in North Korea, because it is hermetically sealed. But it does not work in the West.
This is a wake up moment for the media. My solution has been to get rid of the Nazi ideas, and go full tilt on the humanistic ideas. Shed all the ideas of control and truly enlighten the world.
In this sense I believe that this blog is an ideal to the media.
But, we will see, and one thing is certain, I will NEVER be invited into the Dansh media, the hate is too strong.
When I started my political/philosophical career, it was as an intellectual on the far right wing. One of the main new features of this development, was to renew a pro Semitic view of the conservatives.
As time has gone by, and things have developed, it has been obvious to me, that this idea is loosing a bit of its strength.
Lately we have seen the AfD not really digging into the pro Semitic ideas, and also ms. Le Pen is a bit less inclined to follow my lead on this.
It is ok, you are my philosophical children, but let my first give you a but deeper insight into the how’s and whys.
Nationalism is much more than identity politics, it is, basically a striving for a polis like ideology that was firstly invented in the Mesopatamian area with famed cities as Babylon and Eden.
It is a system that is slowly developed through millennia. It is much more than just the frame around a people, it is a system that has been time proven.
The deeper stratification of these ideas are however mostly forgotten in the realm of academia, though we still can trace them in the work of great philosophers as Plato and Aristotle.
But, and this is important, it is a system, that we need to strive to uphold to make work, otherwise is disappears in moral corruption. As we see these days, and you all know to be true. You fight this moral corruption, as you should, and as it is advised in all the old scriptures.
BUT, and this is where pro semitism comes in. There is a natural ideal that we all strive for, a kind of arch nation that serves as an ideal. Both spiritually as well as in practice. A kind of reversed Babylon.
That nation is called Israel.
Ideally Jews are the caretakers of the First Nation. That is the system.
So nationalism cannot be antisemitic in its core. It would be against the very nature of nationalism.
Now Jews have their burdens to bear. Because being chosen to lead and make the First Nation is a truly gigantic task. It will leave precious little room for mistakes. Jews are struggling to fulfill this task, and we are getting somewhere at least. But it is truly difficult.
But the system has this structure for a reason. The reason being, that the system and ideology of a nation is a striving for good.
A striving for a harmonious and just society. A society where one is free.
Add to this the home of religion, you can see, that the bar is truly put high.
We should seriously strive to put that bar high, to truly fulfill the ideology of a nation.
It is complicated, but it is also possible.
However, to strive for goodness is always that; not a fixed point, but a star in the horizon, that we will perhaps never reach, but we always strive to reach. The entirety of our lives. Because the Nation requires this for us; for us to strive to make a solid and wonderful basis under our nation.
That is what Israel is. And that is why it is so important to be friends with the Jews. Because even though Jews are not perfect, they know, that this truly what it is to be Jewish and be good. And they know that the world judges us, on this conduct.
The U.K. is at a crossroads. The old regime is falling, and a new is slowly rebuilt. As one of the architects behind this new order, I profoundly believe that it will be better.
There are some challenges ahead, so we need to concentrate on a civilised and progressive handling of these issues.
It all goes hand in hand with the fall of the empire, and the rebuilding of an alternative.
Here, new signs from her majesty, bring me hope. She is not someone to be trifled with, and I think she will save the U.K..
But how? And how do we do it in a manner that will ensure humanity as well.
Here I think that the Anglican church will have a pivotal role, since it is a body of wise men and women, as well as a strong intellectual community.
We however need to be realistic about the challenges we meet, we have to openly discuss them, and act accordingly.
I love Oxford, and it has long become a goal of mine to return there.
We need to save the U.K. and the England.
To do that, we need to specify the dangers, and build on the strengths.
The strength of the Anglican Church is faith. No more, no less. But not a confronting or aggressive faith per se. A defensive faith in the sense, that to have faith is defended.
It is right to be a Christian, as it is right to have any faith.
We should start there, and then build from there. This includes a conservative agenda, politically as well. Faith should be the foundation of our political decisions.
When I began my political career, it was as an extreme right wing. Or rather it was at that position, and I believe that I pushed the conservative political position away from an antisemitic, pronazi perspective to a pro semitic liberal perspective.
The current fight with islamism is a fight for freedom, justice and a western civilisation.
After some time I hooked up with mr. Obama, and still held on to the same ideas, but as American politics in total is much more natural conservative, it made sense.
But now the outset of my political career is blooming and wreaking havoc around Europe, France especially with Front National is a philosophy catching fire. As always with France.
Philosophy on fire, that is France.
Now, I could turn political correct and denounce my children of the first part of my political life, but that is not me. Once a friend always a friend, and I will continue to support the children of my first philosophy, among them Mr. Wilders and Ms. le Pen.
Good luck Marine le Pen, I support you.
And look what she is saying, that is a revolution right there.
G-d bless France, and may he live for another thousand years.
When I first entered politics, it was at a specific occasion. I recall it as it was yesterday, I was at the local gym, and I overheard two young migrants talking in the gym. Like, you know, listening to their conversation by chance. The one said, “you know, I think half of the girls in my club have been raped”.
It kind of struck me, and ever since, I have thought of it as my Wittenberg moment. It made me “stand here, and be able to do no other”, as Luther said.
I other words, the moral depravity of the utterance propelled me to where I am today.
Because, you may read a lot in the media, or blogs. This can be manipulated or false news, or whatever it is called. But to hear it yourself, then you just have to believe it.
I am reading a lot of Henry David Thoreau these days, the philosopher that is behind the civil rights movement, Ghandi and of course Martin Luther King. Here is a citation of his:
“Action from principle—the perception and the performance of right—changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary, and does not consist wholly with anything which was. It not only divides states and churches, it divides families; ay, it divides the individual, separating the diabolical in him from the divine.” (“Walden” by Henry David Thoreau)
In other words, if you do recognize that something is wrong, and you stand up against this wrong, then it changes the society all the way down to the smallest unit, the family. People disagree, are not satisfied with your ideas and so on. Nonetheless, that is what Change is all about.
Thoreau changed the world in relation to slavery, right. He looked at it, and concluded that it was basically wrong. Slavery of human beings is wrong.
Thoreau goes on and on about moral conviction, about standing up for something. Here is another quote I like.
“Oh for a man who is a man, and, as my neighbor says, has a bone in his back which you cannot pass your hand through!”
In other words, having a moral backbone is important to Thoreau.
Now, what about that incident when I overheard the migrants talking about the rape of the young girls at their club. What is really the moral content of that?
First of all, it is pretty clear, that it is wrong. Rape will destroy a young girls life, will change them for the worse. It will make them scared and will limit their range of freedom. It is, by all means a vicious and evil deed.
NOT doing anything about a situation where one is witness to such an evil act, is depraved and wrong.
Now, the Scandinavian states have long hidden the fact, that young girls are repeatedly raped and molested. The public parts of the state are actively downgrading the real numbers.
If you speak up on these issues, you are actively persecuted by the state attorney (here I speak out of my own personal experience) and you are punished with a range of other things. You cannot publish books if you are an intellectual, you cannot get a job that suits your qualifications. In my case, I have been hit with the “Mafia” method, that is persecution by the state in material matters. Add to this an infiltration of all that I have ever been a part of, including my family.
This is the sentence the public deals out to one who speaks up about the rapes.
Thoreau went to jail for a day. His comment was pretty cool I think. He felt free for the first time. Now, the modern states are different from the state that Thoreau had to confront. In a sense, it is much more depraved since it does not give me an opportunity to discuss the accusations at court. So the usual system of checks and balances is simply foregone.
There is no court for me, just a blind judge, persecutioner and policeman in one. No justice for me.
It has been around ten years now. That is a long time, longer than Thoreaus one day. So compared to Thoreau, it is a stronger sentence. But basically it is the same.
The children of Thoreau, Martin Luther King, Ghandi among others, were not so lucky as to have just one day at prison. They were actively persecuted by the state as well.
But that is how it is to fight a corrupted state, it is fringed with horrors, jail sentences and persecution.
What we however have to remember, is that it is about being honest, right? Having that principled mind that Thoreau and others think about. Confronting things that are wrong.
Raping young girls is wrong, and I will continue to fight for the freedom and the wellbeing of these young persons, until I am no more. I will not bend for a treat or a threat. Because it is wrong, and those who seek to enforce it or to cover up for it, are equally wrong. These are the new slave masters of the 21 century. The despicable, dishonest members of state, who seek to enforce more humiliation of youngs girls, and give them more pain.
This is who we revolutionise for. Not slaves of a slavefarm owner. But tyranny from a corrupted state, using young girls as cannon fodder to an end I actually even do not really understand.
G-d bless the will to be honest and principled and humane in the face of evil.
NAME: Asger Trier Engberg
IBAN: LT 9132 5004 1618 3489 51
SWIFT/BIC: REVOLT21
BANK ADRESS: Revolut Bank UAB, Konstitucijos ave. 21B, 08130, Vilnius, Lithuania
.........................................................................
Books
Titan
The development of Denmark has reached the shores of California, the epithets of Chicago, the halls of Oxford, but the true wisdom of Denmark were made and formulated on blogs. This book will give you an insight into the basic philosophical principles that were discussed after the Mohammed crisis. It is provocative, acidy, monumental and easy to read. (In danish)
Mod visdom og retfærdighed
According to Platon three virtues were most important to the leader of anything; courage, wisdom and justice. But how do we define these virtues today? This book will give you an insight into the virtues reflected in the wisdom of some of the most succesful leaders of modern Denmark. (In danish)
Read more
.........................................................................
Den gode leder
Business in philosophy, or philosophy in business? We march down the straits of Aristotle and Løgstrup, to reach port in the sense of meaning in business. This book will give you an idea of why and how you do business, based on the most profound philosophy of ancient and modern time. (In danish)
