In these truly difficult times, it is well and important to understand how we get through this crisis. As her majesty the Queen addresses the commonwealth and the nation this evening, there is one thing that may be important for the inhabitants of the English isles and beyond.

As we are told in old books about the country, there is such a thing as tenacious even obstinate understanding of the world. The stiff upper lip as someone sometimes calls it.

It means, that through difficult times, we still maintain the dignity of our persons, go on in the face of difficulty with our life’s in a most solid and stoic way.

That way of ancients seafarers standing on the washed off planks of the vessels of old. Strong, unmoved by the forces around them, to reach that distant port of Dover or London.

That is the character of the English. This character is what is called for, in these difficult times.

That ancient, strong, stoic way of doing things.

Some might call it all business, but deep down we know that it is otherwise, it is beyond business and truly what calls and beacons to that old strong man on the islands.

Being that man, is what will bring hope, because that man can do anything and carry through also this challenge, difficult as it may be.

May the isles of England purvey its glory of the flag, that has now risen again.

G-d bless her majesty the Queen, and may she carry us through this nightmare with her wisdom and terrible but endless power of the crown and will of the people. May Great Britain carry through these difficult hours of despair and be reborn in a new image of strength and vigor. G-d bless the strength of the people, as it carries through these difficult times. G-d bless the Anglican Church, as it blesses the sanctity of all people of Britain, and G-d bless the most rev. Premiere Minister, may his health still be sound, and his actions swift and clear. G-d bless the common wealth where all are in trouble, and G-d bless all those who carry the burdens of the disease. G-d bless us all, and may we persevere.

Ok, we now know, what the prime methods against the Coronavirus:

1. Isolation
2. Finding the sick and those who infect others

On these methods, we can work.

This means, as it is the method that will harm the least, that we need to find the diseasespreaders and isolate them. This is what is the most benign and most effective method to combat the virus.

Again, this will effect a lot of people, but it needs to be done.

Secondly, we need to be smart about closing down our countries. There is no need to close down areas, that are not effected. So we need to monitor the areas that we are responsible for, and only close those that are affected. At the same time, make sure, that people do not travel regionally.

This disease targets all the most religious countries. We live in large families, and this way of living creates the perfect condition for at large scale infection.

The virus is a poisoning, this means, that the families that are large create massive amounts of virus in their families.

So, we need to help those countries that are religious the most. But first and foremost, the religious countries need to ramp up their fight against the disease massively.

G-d will only protect us, if we are use what we have of tools to work. We have to do what we can in order to combat this disease.

Especially in the Muslim countries we face a massive catastrophe, we need to tackle that, and protect those families.

This is extremely important.

G-d bless the will to act on this virus now.

Well, it seems to me, that the strategies that I have devised; the anti sino strategy, and the return to a liberal/conservative nation state is a serious strategy in the light of the Coronavirus.

Exactly these issues have come forth in the international catastrophe. 1. The fact, that we CANNOT rely on Chinese manufacture. Maybe for nonessential products, but all serious production capability, that being of medical equipement, IT infrastructure and so on. Simply cannot be put in the hands of China, or of any country we cannot trust around the globe. We have to bring production home. If the businesses haven’t got the gist of it now, when will they.

That is a national production package of tremendous proportion must be done. Use all the money we now seed into the societies to move the critical production from countries we do not trust, to countries we do trust. That is essentially the West and off cause parts of the East, as we can find new friends there.

But China, Singapore and all these countries, no go.

2. The federal level of state has failed us, it has not met the problems in any meaningful way. This should change, so that national parliaments should have power again.

We have a success with national parlimentarism, let us build on that.

So in a way, it has been a good thing to stress test the global world, and find the insecurities and flaws. It shows us what should be done.

As I and mr. Barack Obama devised; bring back jobs and production to the West, and strengthen the humanistic, democratic virtues and values.

That will bring us to the other side of the Corona virus in a strengthened position.

We need to learn. The lesson is clear; no more China, and no more weakening of the will of the people.

The people should rise, to meet these challenges, together in a democratic, sound nation.

G-d bless the will to be strong in the face of adversity.

Well, the Corona virus has been devastating for a lot of reasons. Not the least the fact, that people are dying.

The worst is still to come in some areas, but so far the entire human race has not been eradicated.

If we look at the virus, there has become apparent certain traits of the virus.

Firstly, there has been two major successful ways of reacting to the virus, one is communist the other is capitalist or democratic.

The communist version is total lockdown of the society, the capitalist is to use AI and tech to deal with the individual people of disease.

So there are two methods reflecting our mindset and social construction. This is not a criticism, but a simple description of the current state of affairs.

The first method is extremely costly in terms of human suffering, the second is less so, but will take a lot of principles of freedom away, that we have currently got used to having.

That is a serious consideration, to keep our rights, also after the epidemic outbreak.

My recommendation would be to go with the smart solution, but respect, that there may be a reason to use the communist solution.

In some areas, there is not enough available tech to use the smart solution, and not a sufficient amount of mask, testing equipment and so on, to make the strategy work. In this area, you may need to be more hard handed.

But if you can, make the curfew as small as humanely possible.

We will have to see, what will happen in the next couple of weeks, but we are still in the midst of the epidemic, and we need to stay vigilant and take countermeasures that fits the layout of the society we are in, and spread of the disease.

G-d bless the peace we will find, at the end of this humane catastrophe.

I know, that in these times, it is difficult for the Italians. Everybody else are as put down by the Corona virus as you are in Italy.

But that should not stop us from showing some attention and solidarity for Italy in this difficult hour!

Viva Italia!

And may G-d bless your recovery.

It seems to me, that all the trouble we have, is due to the fact, that we have not contained China.

Let us have a look on the facts of the Corona COVID/19 virus.

It spread from a place called Wuhan in China. Specifically from a so-called ‘wetmarket’ that is a vile word for a horrendous market where you can buy all kinds of game. That lions, deer, dogs, bats and other kind of exotic animal game.

In itself, these markets are a terrible thing. Just imagine to put living animals in cages on top of each other, let them suffer there, and then just use them for the refined tastes of the upper echelons of Chinese communist aristocracy.

It is pretty dark.

But on top of that, these markets are so dirty, that they CREATE these viruses. Not only the Corona virus, but also the bird flu.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am not a doctor, but it seems to me, that the circumstances that the Chinese authorities are allowing in these places are beyond acceptable on all parameters.

It simply shows what will happen if the world I lead by China.

Because they are essentially so dark and disregarding towards essential human treatment of others, in these circumstances animal game, that the world they create is a terrible place.

Compare this to the Americans, with all their ideals of human rights, enlightenment and democracy.

Who do you really wish to lead the world?

If this continues, the world that China will create is the Corona world, that is pretty dark and bleak, but that is how it is going to be.

A world where faults and covered up, where saving face is more important than millions of lives, and where the state breathes lies.

Are we really ready for that, or are we going to turn that development around?

I vote for the last.

G-d bless the will to be honest in a situation, where the trend is to support the lies.

I have not commented on the running discussion of the Corona virus, due to the simple fact, that I am not a doctor, so I have no knowledge of how to treat a disease.

But I have a lot of reflection of the POLITICAL impact of the virus.

Let us have a look on what works, and what does not work with the Corona virus.

First what works?

A well coordinated, efficient internalization of those infected with the virus.

Each country that manages to actually isolate those with the virus, and putting them in quarantine manages to reduce the risk. It is quite basically a matter of finding the culprits, and putting them in isolation.

How do you do that?

First of all, it is a matter of local tradition. South Korea uses AI and IT, China uses draconian laws and so does Denmark.

But the mission is essentially the same; find the infectors and isolate them.

My point is, there may be different ways of doing things, but please think about the human cost. Is it ok to lock the doors of those infected, or could you put them into isolation in other ways? Maybe finding people who are infected does not have to be draconian, but could be done through intelligence and skill?

Point being, if we lose our humanity in a situation where it is most needed, it may not be the best way to think.

This does not mean, that we should be naive, just that just because a tool is severe does not make it necessarily efficient. Smart tools are often much better, since they are targeted and much more efficient.

G-d bless the will to be smart about these things.

We have to understand what human rights are, where they came from, to really use them in this modern world.

They came from the French Revolution, but more precisely, they came from Voltaire and some of the experience he had with law.

The story is like this.

Voltaire was a law student, so he really understood law. Add to this, he was a Platonic, Socratic idealist, that really understood the importance of law.

Remember human rights are not just universal laws, they are LAWS.

So to understand human rights, we need to understand, that we essentially support the idea, that law, that is judges, the police and so on are an integral part of society. In other words, it is essentially a conservative perspective.

Voltaire had a very nasty experience in his time, he was a Socratic like me, so he criticized the society. This earned him a lot of problems, like me, so he had to flee his country.

But at the core of some of his experience was the accusation against him by a noble, that was ABOVE the law.

This individual could use the courts as he pleased.

Effectually tearing down the impartiality of the law system.

Human rights is the idea of Voltaire, that if we all are linked to law, we win the freedom from not having to worry about injustice.

If law reigns supreme with uncorrupted judges, we all are free from the rule of the strong.

That is, we are not forced to live in a society, where the strong supresses the weak.

That is justice in a platonic and thus French Revolution perspective.

If we put this at the side of globalism, that preaches open borders, what does that imply?

It implies, that you cannot have freedom unless there is order by the judges based on human rights.

If we forget this essential learning, then the system of human rights fall apart.

Then we are forced to live under the yoke of the strong. The criminal, the tyrant.

Fighting for a free world, based on law is the essence of American unity.

Because it all makes us equal despite of difference in color.

G-d bless the will to have human rights.

According to Voltaire, there are two things that is needed, to make something great. It has to be simple, and it has to be natural.

It is pretty funny, I mean mr. Trump went on in the election to claim that he wanted to make America great again.

But what is that, making America Great.

As Voltaire sees it, it must be a simple thing, and then natural.

When Barack and I fought for Obamanism, we made a claim for American ideology. That is that we fight for humanistic democracy.

That is simple, that is natural, and therefor that is what makes the US so special.

It is the core values of the US, following those core ideas, will propel the US to be as great as it has always been.

Being the valiant light of Democracy upon that hill, that is what makes America Great.

Understanding what that is, that is what is the issue and the task of anyone that wants to make great again. My claim being, that Americas virtues lies with its core ideas.

Follow them, and you will lead the world.

G-d bless the will of the founding fathers.

There is a lot of wisdom in the US, and there is a lot of quality. Let us be honest about what the US is, and what we want it to continue to be.

It is a Protestant, democratic, humanistic country.

As an ideological idea, this is truly why we all love it, and why it is the IDEOLOGICAL leader of the world.

The world is good by the fact, that such a benevolent and humanistic power leads it.

Talking about the greatness in the US. It is not the material wealth or the technological development. These things are essentially just the effect of the IDEAS of the US.

Many American in the political world, especially in the Democratic Party loves Denmark. I get it, we are currently on the bleeding edge of political development. Or rather, I am.

But if I had to choose which country should lead the world, there would be no doubt in my mind, that it would be the US.

The idealism, the humanist spark, the dreams, the current development, that is good.

That is what should lead the world, not Denmark.

Point being, that the reason why I and so many other people around the world really respect and love the US. Is because it is a light on a top of a hill.

Don’t forget that, it is not Denmark that has all the best virtues and values, it is you guys.

I only happen to agree with you, because I am a platonic humanist like yourselves.

May G-d bless the United States of America.

We need something, that will propel this election on.

Here is a take on it.

For a long time, we have been focused of what drives us apart, and not on what we have in common.

What do we have in common. Well there is one thing we all, from all corners of the world, have in common, a universal value; that is human rights.

Human rights have been dissolved into something I personally do not recognize very much lately. So we need, as I see it, to go back to basics, and have another look at what human rights and also, this includes of cause civil rights, do encompass.

It all started with French philosophers as Voltaire, that I happen to read these days. And let me tell you, he is SO inspiring.

What he did, was to look at rights as something universal. Something we can all have, but what is the basics of human rights? It is the freedom from tyranny.

To be free from oppression. This is THE idea about law. It gives the individual an attempt at being free from the haphazard will of tyranny and people who wish to put other people down.

It can be used in many areas of interest.

First and foremost it can be used to look at the freedom of the individual. Where does the state drive away the freedom of each citizen, and how do we ensure that this freedom is upheld. Here of cause we have a long and proud tradition in the US, to ensure that each individual has the ability to ensure his or her own freedom. That is THE idea that the valiant troops of the republic brings to the shores of the oppressed.

Then there is freedom of expression, that has been a huge issue here in Denmark. We are right now making a kind of ghastly monument in Denmark, my organization was, like Charlie Hebdo, gunned at by an Islamist five years ago. They even made a film about it.

But I think most important of all, freedom of looking however you want to look. Be it black, yellow green or white.

It doesn’t matter what you look like, we are all created equal under the grace of the spirit.

It doesn’t matter. We are all free, free from oppression and ridicule. Free to be who we are.

That would be the wise words of rev. Martin Luther King. To find freedom from opression through rights of each person of the beautiful republic of America.

G-d bless that amazing and happy country, may it live for another thousand years.

I read a lot about the French Revolution. I would be so bold to say, that I am a fanboy of the French Revolution. As others are fanboys of Apple or AC/DC, for me it is the French Revolution.

To me, a lot of the problems that we face today can be understood on the light of that amazing upheaval.

That was the time, where the CITIZEN, the CITOYEN was coined as a phrase of the new ideas of Voltaire, Rousseau and Eliphas Levi.

Reading Voltaire is a powerful glimpse into the world of the revolution, and it is extremely inspiring for me.

As he says; we are the light of the revolution the truth tellers and wielders of rationality.

This is the true core of human rights and humanism. The ability to see things as they are.

We try that, but more often than not, we fail in seeing the nuances and the truth of a situation.

We fall back on old ideas, instead of being truly progressive in the sense of finding new ideas.

True progressivism is taking bold steps in a new direction. But, as I see it, honoring the base of our ideas. Voltaire was the first true revolutionary, let us honor his quest for Democracy and enlightenment. Because without it, what we do is just participating in the mudslinging.

That is not humanism or enlightenment, that is just our stupid human nature doing whatever it wants.

Elevating ourselves to the level of true enlightenment is the quest of honesty, being simple in our understanding.

Trying to understand the world for what it is, and act accordingly.

G-d bless the will to be honest about the world as it is.

Now after Brexit, which was a good thing to my mind, and the truly difficult situation that the Democratic Party is in, we have to be sharp on our priorities.

First of all, we have to realize that there is a more nuanced picture on migration than just ‘all migrants are suffering victims’. In order to push through to a more sustainable and balanced view on the world, we need to see the details.

Let me give you a good example, that is firmly rooted in theory that I have done politically.

On one hand we have the Kurds, brave socialists, at the other hand we have Islamic state, vile islamists.

That is, they are both Sunni Muslims, but choose different paths on to how they view Islam.

One is truly all in on democracy, that other is not.

That is really the basis of the difference between our allies and our enemies.

The problem is, as I see it, we do not differentiate in the US or the UK.

Here we still see all Muslims as victims. They are not, some chose to bomb our cities, and do evil things. Others are heroes.

It is as rev. Martin Luther King prescribed. We are the ones, who support the society, try to blend in, be good citizens with rights.

But there are some, who chose to fight society to change into something that is wrong.

Understanding this difference is most important to me.

The same goes for the UK. There is the Anglican Church, that is truly universal and not racist. But there are things going on in and around some British cities, that is vile.

This balance is off cause most difficult to find. To be not racist, and at the same time accept that there is a true problem with Islamism, but that is just a fact.

Rev. Martin Luther King did not like Malcolm X, because his dream was to make a society where all were accepted. From little to big.

We have to follow in his footsteps.

G-d bless the will to be clear on these matters.

Now when Britain has become free, and then has to find itself in a new role in a world that has changed massively since the admission into the EU, new ideas have to be thought.

When the Roman empire fell, it took a long time for it to refind its true new role.

It went like this. After all the invasion of the vikings of that time, the central administration was kept in one piece not with regards to the political or the military infrastructure, but the faith.

As the two arms of the Roman empire vanished the church just kept on keeping on.

The good thing about this was, that the provinces that used to be a part of the Roman empire could still be inspired and helped in terms of civilisation, while as the direct control that, honestly was a yoke around the neck of many of the provinces, was removed. Thereby giving each province a much more free connection to Rome.

This model was so succesful, so that when the southern european states expanded in the 14 and 15 century, they took this model to the Americas.

It is still like that.

The same role could be one for the British empire. So that the influence and sway that London holds over the former parts of the empire is mainly through cultural development and the facilitation of cooperation.

This seems to be quite popular among the former colonies, to be a part of a wider commonwealth.

There is the fact, that the military wing of the British empire is still intact. So there is a possibility to bolster the support London could give around the world to allies with firepower as well. Some of the conflicts in China and in Africa are quite harsh, and should be supported by the military wing.

In this way, through culture and military support, the empire could slowly find its footing again.

It will never be controlled directly from Whitehall again, but a new more sustainable balance could be found. I mean, the Roman empire is still here 1700 years after it fell. Perhaps the British empire could do the same.

In other words, what we are doing now, is laying the groundworks for a development that will culminate in thousands of years.

It is this perspective that is truly scary and wonderful at the same time, so much potential, so much work to do.

But it is this mission, that truly calls for historical action.

A person living in this process will be hailed down through the next thousands of years as reformers and visionaries. Imagine that.

And g-d bless the Anglican Church, because the anglican church will be the most important frame around this development.

Well, finally we can actually do something in regards to the development of terrorism and the jihadis using the streets of London to wage their civil war.

Because, let us face it, that is what it is.

In this regard, there are some difficult issues we need to tackle and discuss.

Some years ago mr. Johnson got pretty unpopular in the press because he compared the peculiar headdress of a certain Muslim faith to letterboxes.

Point being, that that is not a part of a free western world.

The same could be said about waging jihad with a knife in the middle of the day. That is not, and should not be a part of Western civilization.

It may be ok in the streets of Kandahar, but it is not ok in London, go figure.

So what do we do?

Well, this is the time, we need to use our new acquired freedoms.

Before, we had a lot of trouble with the European Union in these issues, because they did not see the threat to Democracy that the islamists pose, but saw a threat to their own power.

These things are not necessarily the same, but often it is.

Be as it may, there was no real consequence for a jihadi waging war in the streets, because of the stalemate of power between parliament and Bruxelles.

This is not an issue anymore, we are free to follow a conservative course on this political issue.

So what will we do?

We start repatriating all the jihadis.

Some of them have citizenship, others not.

But to wage war against the democratic constitution as they are doing now, is not within the bounds of their citizenship. So if they do that, their citizenship should be taken from them.

In this way, they will never be let loose in the streets again.

They are free to go back to where they originally came from, essentially this is not our problem.

We have to be extremely tough on these issues, and this is something that works.

G-d bless the will to punish those who attack the weakest, bringing justice to those who despise Democracy.

Well, there are a lot of things, that are going in the right way, and there are a lot things, that I simply cannot save in time.

To spread the vision, and see it a little from above, we can see some astounding successes and some corners of the world, that are simply going down.

Sweden is honestly beyond repair. I would like to help them, but the amount of problems they have right now is so devastating, so that is simply beyond my reach.

At the other hand the Anglo saxons are on a true course of improvement. The UK has just been liberated, the US is truly on its way up. It works, and in ten years the Anglo Saxons will be free and content again.

There is the conflict with China looming in the horizon, and the UK has a lot of work to do to serve the empire. But these things are essentially just work and not really challenges. It has to be done, it will create an abundance of opportunity and progress. But it is not difficult.

Yes there are a host of issues that are challenging in the UK, among them migration that has to be tackled, but that is also ‘just’ a matter of policy.

Off cause the crown jewel of my political is Israel, that is heading for true peace, so that is good as well.

My job situation seems to be improving as well. I have finally managed to get a media job, that serves my needs, and leaves plenty of room for blogging.

It may not be so prestigious, but it gives the politicians an easy route to my positive attention here in Denmark, so that I can contribute to the development of Denmark.

All in all a situation that is essentially stable, and will give me a way to combine my living with blogging.

Ten years, more or less, will be the span of my work I think. After that, there will be new players and philosophers to challenge me. Which is all just good and the way things are supposed to be.

But the next ten years, my aim is to wrangle the West out of the death grip it has been in as a result of the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

Hopefully at the end of the process, we will have a bit more stable, humane and free world.

At least, that is my aim.

G-d bless the will of the strong to find peace in this world.

Finally, Great Britain has become free once again. Free to set its own course, free to remain a whole, free to roam the seas of the world.

Many people see all the talk about the empire as a talk of a bygone time. They believe, that the West is finished, and we might as well all just turn off the light, and take of our slippers.

But is it so, and what are the real deal behind the PRACTICAL situation of the world.

I mean, as long as Australia flies Union Jack in their flag, and as long as Hong Kong yearns to have the support of Great Britain. Then there is, in practise, an empire. Not an empire of subjugation and tyranny, but an empire of practical proportion. It is there, whether you like it or not.

And it needs repair. The demoralisation and often right out despair is not good. What the empire needs, is a stable hand on the wheel and an inspired position of leadership.

This is not about tyranny, or putting people down. It is about taking care of those who are family.

That is not a bad thing, that is a good thing.

So as long as the intentions are serious and positive. There is no reason not to fly the banner, once again.

G-d bless the will of the british people and all those in the commonwealth.

75 years ago, Europe went through a massive antisemtic purge.

In most of Europe, the narzies as Winston Churchill called them, went through the European homeworld, where jews had lived for thousands of years and purged them. Got rid of them, put them concentration camps and what was worse.

Unimaginable horror went down in Europe, to a people with so little defence.

Yes, there were Jews that did things wrong, as there are today. But systematic extinction, that is horribly wrong.

As of now, no viler crime has been done to the Jews in our long history. The Shoa, Holocaust was a crime not only against Jews, but against all of humanity.

Understanding the how’s and ifs is vital also today.

But as a fact, it seems to me, that we learn so little. Today in Denmark antisemitism is ripe for another round in the ring.

The same old same position. How are we to fare against this monster.

Well as it is prescribed in the torah, by being the people of light. By trying to be honest, openminded, true to what we see as right and wrong.

Yes, there are those who do not seek to harm us, let us be happy about that. Yes, there are those who seek to harm us, let us be honest about that.

But first and foremost, let us hail the light.

Let us be the ones, that see truth for what it is. Honesty, integrity, morality, be good persons in this time of persecution once again.

Let us turn that “once again” into a “never again”.

G-d bless the will to be the light in a time of creeping darkness.

Well, the situation of the world has changed. It seems to me, that the middle leaning Democrats, and the middleleaning conservatives are really what it is all about.

I certainly do not believe we should start a third world war or anything in the like.

But there are minorities around the world, that still need some attention.

One minority, that I have personally been involved with a lot is the Christian minority of Egypts. The Copts.

This little but extremely beautiful church is an ancient church that has been in Egypt for millennia.

I truly believe, that the relationship mr. Al-Sisi has with his Christian populace is not good, but still something that is recommendable.

We should look out for the minorities in the world, not at least the Christian minorities that have a truly hard time in the Middle East these days.

G-d bless the will to protect those without protection.

Well, it seems to me, that the waves of war and conflict has soothed a little over the last four days.

The threatening conflict between the US and Iran has not come to pass, and therefor we have a calm.

I do not understand why we cannot have some kind of peace. But I do understand why the animosity arises.

Let me try and explain.

First of all, war is because people want it. If one side of a conflict wants a conflict, it will happen.

If both sides in a conflict wants a conflict it will perhaps happen, according to the reflection of the red lines of each opponent. That is, do we respect the red lines of the other or not.

So, this is what it is about in this conflict, the US put up a red line and Iran stepped over it.

Then Iran retaliated, but now the US holds its guns.

A stalemate is also some kind of peace, but it may not last.

Lets see, but let us also be vigilant.

G-d bless the possible peace.

When I first started on philosophising on strategy a small but very interesting book caught my attention. It is called “The art of war” by Sun Tzu, a Chinese general in the ancient times. It has a lot of hard-won, real life experience with war by the great ancient general.

One of his basic maxims is his understanding of the psychological importance of warfare.

It is written, that in order to win a war, you have to know yourself but off cause more importantly, you have to know your enemy.

So this is the psychology of war, knowing your own mindset in opposition to the mindset of your opponent.

Now who are we here in the West. First of all, at the most basic level, we are vikings. This mentality when it comes to warfare is savage, extremely violent and very, very strong. This is essentially why we rule the world.

On top of this, there is a layer of Roman virtue. That is the values of the Roman empire that was so strong in Germany, France and the UK.

It calls for disciplin but also, as Roman culture was very influenced by greek culture, for Democracy and human rights.

So in fact, we ourselves are a mix of Viking spirit and Roman spirit.

At the other hand, our adversary; the Iranians is a very different culture.

The Iranians or the Persians as they call themselves as a people are an ancient civilisation.

Over many millennia Persia has developed cultural traits that are superb. The first philosopher of Persia, that of Zoroaster was the inventor of the idea of goodness.

This idea is still extremely prevalent in the Iranian culture. They despise all that smells of evil.

This is the reason they are so angry with us. Because we are not really interested in ethics that much. We are much more interested in Freedom.

This cultural background to the conflict is really what it is all about. The Iranians are angry with us, for what they see as evil, we are angry with them for what we see as a lack of freedom.

But, and that is really where it meets a possibility of peace; none of us are really interested in a full scale international war.

This is where we should understand, that neither of us are really evil. We just see things from a different perspective.

Not to say, that we should just accept each others negative behaviour, but understanding each other is point of departure in peacemaking.

G-d bless the good deeds, the good thoughts, and the good actions that we may find.

Well, I have been quite influential in the wars of mr. Barack Obama. They were not all completely successful, to be honest.

But I truly believe, that we amassed some experience, that can be used today.

What are the essential points that we learned from seven years of fighting?

First of all, you need to have a look at the ethics of your fight.

You have to know why you are fighting, and then how you wish to fight.

This was the morale behind the fight with Islamic State. We chose to fight them, because they were against democracy, and obviously inhuman.

So we fought for democracy and for a more humane world.

This basic ethical way of fighting, was so successful, that even Iran, a former enemy joined the fight. Add to this also the Arabs.

So a clear ETHICAL mission is important in modern warfare.

The next thing we realized is the HOW of fighting. With the internet, everybody truly knows what you are doing. It is very difficult to lie about a war.

So before the internet, the Palaestinians and other Middle Eastern combatants could make what you call ‘Potemkin settings’. That is, you manipulate with the footage and pictures you send out to the press.

Now, that is very difficult to do in an open internet world. So Gaza got a thorough hit on that occasion, as their deception was unveiled. This is not to say, that they do everything wrong, just that in this instance, they did loose a lot of credibility.

That was the argument behind smart bombs and precision weaponry. To avoid civilian casualties.

So again, you have to find that difficult ethical way of fighting, that will ensure international support.

Be the good guys.

Maybe this knowledge can help in the current arms race in the Middle East.

G-d bless the peace we CAN find.

Well, it seems to me, that the idea of making a YouTube channel in connection to the blog, seems to be a really good idea.

Ok, here is the offering. If you are one of the readers on the blog, and I mean anybody, please, if you wish to be inspired or in any other way, to try and discuss the different issues that I cover here, do not hesitate to ask for an interview. Again, it should be absolutely free. I do not want anyone to think I am bought in any way. I have a reasonable paycheck now, so I do not need money anyway. I have sufficient.

So, if you are reading this, and need to be inspired, just pop me an email.

My loyalty is off cause clear. I go with the Democrats in the US, and the conservatives in the UK.

But, this does not imply, that I will ONLY talk with them. I try to be generous with my work and energy, and do this to help. I believe in a helping hand multiplying. If I help, the help I generate will cause other people to help and so on.

But, please, do not make it a big fuss. Meeting a nondescript philosopher in a far away country, can be a pretty tough thing for my little hometown. I like my town, but truth to be told, it is very far from any kind of mainstream. A little happy city in a far away corner of the world, and if we make too much fuss about it, they will not be able to cope with it.

So a discreet contact, and then just a simple interview would be for the best. Then my hometown can rest a bit more, and we can focus on what it is really all about; the political development that everybody wants to see in the world. To make it better.

So please see it as an offer without any hangs. I use my life to help and support, this is what this new tvstation is all about. Helping, inspiring and supporting the political and religious life.

G-d bless the will to do good in the international community.

Well, there is war, and there is peace. As Barack and I did a bit of both, to be honest. Let us have a look at the whys and the hows.

First of all, the first thing that disappears in conflict is the ETHICAL perspective. Often we end up in a tit for tat situation, where one pun is exchanged for another.

Off cause this is not the case with obvious warfaring ideologies. But in most cases in the modern world, we are prone to end up in a vicious cycle of retribution.

Sometimes, you have to fight. Like in the fight with Islamic State. This organization was a threat to the Middle East and the world in general. So we fought them. I have also argued for an open conflict with China. We will end up fighting them anyway due to geostrategic developments that we cannot control.

But the Chinese are emerging as a world power, and they have fought us for four decades behind the scene and with Cold War methods.

As they are expanding to areas that we care about, not the least Hong Kong, war is inevitable.

So we need to stockpile weapons, get our economy in order and so on.

Point being, that war should be a clear choice, based on arguments that exclude the possibility for peace.

Islamic State never wanted peace, so we have to fight them. China has the ability to rein in their advance, but chooses not to.

So we will end up fighting them anyway.

This attitude is the middle road, and thoroughly based on ethics.

If not, then people suffer for no real reason.

I truly believe in that ‘middle of the road’ philosophy. I mean, sometimes you have to fight for your freedom. But most of the time, you should seek for peace, if at all possible.

That middle of the road ideology served us well in the Obama presidency. Hopefully it can continue to do so.

G-d bless the will to find peace, wherever possible.

So 2020 got to be a new year after all. Some of the original ideas I had of a quite apocalyptic nature have just materialized. The attack on an Iranian hard liner general is, more or less, the West first true attack on Islam itself.

This is an attack that sends the message. Ok guys, you f… with us, we f… with you. The internal reaction of White, Viking mentality.

It has been suppressed and put down for a long time, because the liberal elite controlled media and because the same violent reaction that was unleashed in the Second World War, by the nazies, was pretty scary.

Now, this is not to compare mr. Trump with the nazies, he is definitely not a nazi. He may be many things, but not a nazi. What he truly is though is a Viking.

Now the Middle East have known the harsh reaction to the expansion of Islam many times, not at least in the days of the crusaders. Who were the really harsh fighters of the crusaders. Were they the benign pious knights, or the vile Viking fighters?

Well, it was the Vikings. I know, because I live in country full of them. I know the reality of this Viking mentality. It is like an avalanche of violence and destruction.

This is what the diaspora of Muslims and their attempt at creating some sort of bridge head of Islam in Western Europe has created.

The slow expansion is finally met with the viking feeling. That is unrestrained violence.

Taking into account, that we are mechanically superior to the Muslims in general this has to end up in Muslim genocide, if we are not careful.

I have fought a long time for peace in the Middle East, and I believe, that Israel is a vehicle for peace.

But even I, cannot hinder war and mayhem, if the parties escalate as we see it today.

Luckily, we have peace with many Arab countries, but for how long, if the crusading Vikings descend on the Middle East with all its true power.

Don’t get me wrong, but the mainstream media, that used to put down the violent tendencies of the Vikings are truly gone.

There are no strings attatched anymore.

Each side will sit in each of their Facebook page, and cheer for their armies.

This is it, the consequence of my own youthful idealism, making the apocalypse I predicted.

Sorry for that, I have tried to hinder it.

But at the end of the day, this is where we each look into ourselves, and see if we can work for peace or war.

Let us hope, that peace wins, eventually. But I am afraid, that it does not.

G-d bless the peace we may find, at the end of this conflict.

Happy new year, god jul, and happy Hanukkah!

It has been a dramatic year for me, but hopefully a year that will finally turn my situation around.

I have grown from an outcast to something of a fringeacademic, that might truly have a career. Lucky me.

So, the situation is like this. I have managed, finally, to get a contract with the state, on a miniature tv station. It is called a Local tvstation, and is set up all over Denmark.

This ensures a monthly paycheck, you cant live without that, and it should work as a natural extension of my blogging.

With that ensured, I can continue the blogging, and do that as long as I have the license.

It took me over a year to realize the situation, and it has been tremendously difficult.

But, as of now, I have built a tv studio in an old caravan, and have had a few guests there already.

If some of my international readers wish to have a conversation in the caravan, please just send me an email. It is potentially an option for some in depth discussion. We can off cause do it in English, and publish the interview here on Rubicon. It is just an offer.

There is absolutely no money involved, it does not cost anything, but should be seen as an option to discuss your politics, if you wish. You are most welcome.

Apart from that, there are some pretty huge things coming up this year. We have to continue on the American election. My feeling is, that the Democrats are a little demoralized. Don’t be, changing power from one perspective to another is just the way politics work. It is like a pendulum. It will swing back eventually.

What we do have to worry about though, is how we are going to make a political program that will actually work when we are back in power.

Here again, some of the innovation ideas we developed in the Obama presidency is vital. Not at least those ideas of remembering the workers.

That is really the key to the White House, the workers.

The competition between the two sides is fierce, and only if we remember the workers will we succeed.

If not anything else, that is THE point to remember.

G-d bless the will of the people.

Dear Joe, listen I have prophesized myself, that you are going to be President.

Last election, I was a little worried therefor, that you did not stand for president.

But now it makes sense, you just stood over for period.

To me, that is the end of the matter.

I support you, as I have always done. To me, you are going to have a fair shot at the presidency.

So, don’t worry. I am there to support you.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Well, there is a difficult discussion on how to do something for those brave workers communities that has been abandoned in north England.

What to do for them and so on and so forth.

It really worries me, that the simple need that these brave people truly craves has not been mentioned.

It is really quite simple. What does a jobdeprived, poor, stagnant workers community need. Well it is really quite simple. They need jobs.

It is all they really need. They are hardy, proud people. Proud of who they are, and what the do. Craftsmen and hardworking people.

When pops do not have a job, these people suffer.

The entire rebellion of Labour is about that. Proud strong people without a voice.

So all the training and all the infrastructure in the world will not help them. I mean what to train for, and where to go, if there are no jobs.

So, we need to understand, why these proud people are without jobs. Essentially it is because they loyalty between industrialists and country has been severed.

When, in former times, there was pride in the three words; made in the UK. Then proud workers would roam the streets of northern England. Producing and building.

But that patriotism has left the northern England, but has a possibility of a come back, if mr. Johnson sees fit.

This is THE secret behind the wirtschaftwunder of mr. Trump.

Bring back the jobs should be a motto. Talk to the shire tories who have money and have send their production to foreign shores. Talk to their patriotism and care for England. Give them tax cuts and appraisal.

Give them incentive.

In this ALLIANCE between tories and workers both can and will benefit.

Ok, we should not forget free trade, but at the other hand we should not forget the jobs that the workers need.

Give them jobs, and they will stay with the tories. If then Labour gets the same idea, they will have the same possibility for a come back.

It’s about the jobs, that is all there is to it.

G-d bless the will to help those brave souls of northern England.

Well, what happened in the British election? To truly understand this, I think one of the true answers, at least as to what I have contributed with, is what we in the computerworld call “disruption”.

When I started my career, I started working with computers. In fact, I have a masters in usability, that is I am educated in the art of making computers work with people.

This idea championed by the founder of the computer company Apple.

In a way, Steve Jobs has been a huge inspiration to me, in my life.

The way disruption works, is by making moves in a market based on an exceptional understanding of the market.

The same has been my attempt in politics, through an exceptional (if I may be so bold) understanding of political theory, I have advised the different leaders of the world in politics.

As I see it, that is a combination of a modern approach with a classical approach.

I think, that is really the secret behind my success as a philosopher.

The realizations and ambition of disruption in politics as a motor in politics.

Politicians love to really actually make progress, and have done so on the back of my ideas.

In fact, I think, that that is what really is the staying power of the ideas that I give to the different politicians. They actually work.

When Steve Jobs presented his iPhone, people thought that it looked uninteresting. But I could see, that he combined his knowledge in usability, that is the knowledge of making computers work with people, with a device that was packed with as many technical capabilities as possible.

It had to work, it was simply to good a device.

Anyway, we have only seen the beginning of the Changes I have thought and planned. Hopefully the end will be a better, more secure, more prosperous Britain and world in general.

G-d bless the will to Change.

There has been a case of Chinese pressure on a small semi independent part of Denmark.

According to my media sources, China has tried to pressure the Faroe Islands into a deal concerning a new upgrade of the telecommunications network in the Faroe Islands.

One things is, that the network is a potentential for spying on the Faroe Islands, the other thing is the disdain and lack of respect the Chinese have shown Denmark here.

This is unacceptable. We will NOT bow for pressure.

This has been the stance of the current PM of the Faroe Islands, and as a intellectual representative of Denmark, I wholeheartedly support this attitude.

We have our self respect, and we intend to keep it that way.

I also hope that the UK and US alliance will see this rejection as an acknowledgement of the stance that we have in common. Perhaps giving the Faroe Islands a deal if the Chinese walk away. The Faroe Islands export salmon to China.

So again, I wholeheartedly support the wise and courageous pm of Faroe Islands. He is a bit of a hero, that guy.

G-d bless the future of the Faroe Islands.

Well, there is a long time until Labour will win the power again, at least if you do this Boris.

First of all, you need to get jobs for the workers again. This simply is a matter of getting the industrial leaders to invest in production in the UK again. Where? Wherever there are workers. As it is, production has been sent to China, where they are having a bit of a wealth induction.

This means, internationally, that you need to think about China. This again means, that the natural ally in the confrontation between the West and China will be the US. See? The puzzle all falls in place; US, China, UK. The alliance that is natural between the US and the UK, is there to pick up. The friendship between the US and the UK has never been better, and the GOALS of both nations are absolutely aligned.

This is what I have been working for the last eight years that finally falls into place.

Because as the US has a lot of power in and around China, the UK has its empire, and that is thrown in the mix. See? By defending the empire, you all but get all of your goals. Both you solidify the empire, AND you satisfy your new voters.

It is a puzzle that comes together, and should elevate the UK.

Add to this, the added wealth that would flow into the country, you all but have yourself a perfect bargain.

There is the problem of the fractioning of the kingdoms in Great Britain. This however I do not see as much of a problem, why? Because it is a result of the war that the EU made against the nations under its sway. As the central government is weakened, the parts of the nations are trying to find separation. But as soon as the EU is not a part of the governmental structure, there is no drive anymore.

Yes, there will be problems and fights in the Commons, but essentially the fight is over and repairing can commence.

Here again, be gentle and fair to the Irish and the Scots. They have lost, don’t treat them bad. They are proud people.

All in all, we are on the way, to save Britain, as I saved the US. The difference being, the PACE things can pick up. Both the US and the UK. That is a massive power re-emerging.

G-d bless the will of the British people.

Well, that seems to be a huge win for the Conservatives in the UK. Good gracious, what a run.

First of all, it is necessary, to say thank you for those who stood by the Conservatives, and probably will not be thanked. Here off cause I think about mr. Farage. Mr. Farage put country first, and his self sacrifice is THE reason we get this overwhelming majority. If he had stood in constituencies that we had a close call on in terms of conservative voters, we could have lost them. AND the hemorrhaging of Labour voters he did, was also THE factor to win us all the seats in Northern England.

So a HUGE thanks to mr. Farage. That was, actually, not a conservative strategic victory. Strategically it was the Brexit party that won.

So, it will be warming to have such a majority the next five years, but it is mandate to get Brexit done, not necessarily to do conservative policies. We have to remember that in the long run.

But at the end of the day, off cause the great winner is mr. Johnson. What a campaign! To the point, disciplined, and HAMMERING the core message of get Brexit done into the debate over and over again. Well done Boris, that was superb.

Now it is time for celebration. All the issues and problems, the day to day work will be there for us in a forthnight. But now it is a time for celebration.

Well done Boris, you did it for England, and England thanks you. Now GET BREXIT DONE!!

G-d bless the will to GET BREXIT DONE.

The workers have been abandoned by the socialists in many countries. That is what is really changing the political landscape in Western Europe and in the US.

This shift have come due to a change in politics by the socialists. Classical Marxism was all about workers and workers rights, but Frankfurtschool Marxism is all about minority rights and social justice.

This development has been seen without much reflection by the socialists, and has hence just left the classical workers standing without a political class to represent them.

To me this is not an either/or, but a two pronged strategy, that helps the workers back in the limelight, and at the same time does not leave the anti racist stance.

I am not in liking of racism, but I do believe, that you do not fight racism with racism. This is fault of mr. Corbyn I think. He fights racism by hiring people of color. To me, color is just a social construction. We fight racism much better by finding a way to unite people under one banner.

That is why I have talked so much about civil rights and Democracy. Because this banner will not care about color, only care about intention.

I know, that it is difficult to fight something with Hope and Change, but that has always been my idea about how things should go down. By Changing the world without all these negative ways. Finding a true and positive way.

It works, as the US is a testament to.

So either the conservatives or the socialdemocrats have joined this way of actually finding some beautiful and worthwhile as their ideas. And have then often succeeded.

I hope that the UK will also succeed after Brexit, and truly believe, that Democracy and shared human rights will unite the country.

There are many hoops and crevices we need to jump over and into. But we will get there eventually.

G-d bless the will to find new ways.

Well, as there is only one week to the election. I believe, that we are in a good position. If we compare the other two elections before this, first that of Cameron, and then of May. This time around we are actually much better faring. Why?

I would point to two factors. The first is the obvious conservative agenda. Brexit falls naturally along Conservative ideaology of one nation Great Britain.

Secondly it is about the leader, and this is where there is still a potential to reap in the final week.

One of the ‘secret weapons’ Mr. Barack Obama wielded with such alacrity and success, was his eminent ability to speak to the heart of the Americans. He is such an eloquent speaker.

This is something that has not been much in focus this election, but it is a very potent arrow in a good politicians quiver.

What we did in the last election where mr. Obama was doing his eminent work, was that we went around in different areas and spoke.

Mass rallies in factories, stadiums and so on.

Thing is, it is not only the listeners in the venue of the speech that is the target of the speech, it is all those who listens to the soundbites afterwards.

I mean, just think about it. ‘Yes we can!’, or ‘I have a dream’, or ‘tear down this wall’. All the defining moments of great speeches.

It is the most effective tool in a politicians workbench, if he is a good speaker.

So, that could, potentially, lead us to the end without loosing anymore ground, and perhaps win us over those seats in northern England.

G-d bless the will to speak.

Well, there is a bit of a fight going on in the Democratic Party of the US. Somehow the legacy and ideas of the Obama presidency is discussed and the true heirs to the ideas that mr. Obama presented to the world is fought over.

As one of the contributors to the ideology of mr. Obama it made me think about Change.

How does Change actually happen.

One of the greatest example of Change to my mind, was the development in Athens 2500 years ago. Here the greatest minds of the classical world; Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Isocrates, Xenophon and many, many others lived through a time of great intellectual development.

We still hold the classics and best books of this time to high regard, and still read them with great wonder and respect.

But, and this is important, to truly understand Change, they weren’t exactly good friends all these ideologist. They were, even master and pupil, very much in disagreement.

Take Plato and Aristotle. Aristotle was Platos best pupil. Aristotle defined his own ideology, that in many regards, were in complete opposition to that of Plato. Just take their ideals. Plato revered Sparta, whereas Aristotle revered Athens as examples of political system (that is why Aristotle is the main go to philosopher when it has something to do with Democracy, because Athens is the birth cradle of Democracy).

Anyway my main point in regards to some of the diversions we see in the Democratic Party, and actually in between many of the readers here on Rubicon, that is the way Change works.

If you have new ideas, they never stay rigid and fixed, they are like a fountain, projecting water of ideas high in the air, whereas the result is not a fixed picture, but a plethora of rivers running in many different directions.

That is the way Change works.

So I mean, don’t be angry each other for not having the same ideas about things, accept that you have the same outspring, but use the ideas in different ways.

So, perhaps, this will make you accept each other, and be a source of peace.

G-d bless the will to see the world for what it truly is.

Well, things are truly heating up in the UK election. I think we have had a good run in focusing on Brexit again, and we have been pretty unlucky in focusing on security.

We should be honest about the winning ticket, it is Brexit. But we should also be honest about what is ALSO a problem, and that is the security of the country.

I have a feeling, that the voters do not trust the political class to truly deliver on this issue, that is why it is a problem. When we remind them, that we have actually not been good at doing anything, then they get depressed and demoralized.

It is actually a truly depressing and serious problem, that travels into a deeper and much more concerning set of problems.

I believe, that essentially it is a problem of a vicious debate climate. Just mentioning the problems, will get you crucified in the media, and thus, it is truly difficult to get public support behind the process. We are a bit more lucky here in Denmark, because I have been able to push the sincerity and balanced view more agressively.

So, that is truly a deep and worrying problem. Hopefully, we can manage to turn the boat around after Brexit, when we can truly start to rev up the political engine on this issue.

Anyway, we are still leading with quite a margin, and we will win easily. Mr. Corbyn has been loosing ground in terms of ability to set the agenda, and he is rapidly loosing ground with the workers of northern England. That is a very obvious opening.

Mr. Corbyn har been married to identity politics, and has not, as the American Socialdemocrats, been able to find a link between the old and the new ideas.

Be as it may, as long as we keep the discussion on Brexit we will win, it is what this election is about.

It is about the liberty of Great Britain, and in this we have truly historic calling. We should heed that calling, with all of what we are, and what we can manage of power, to the people.

G-d bless the will of the people, and may they reign supreme.

Well, it is, as it always is, in the last 14 days of the election, that things really get hot.

Here are my two advices in regards of this election.

1. Be realistic about what gets the tories support. It is not the NHS, is is not the security issues (except from internatal security, battling islamists). It is the ability to deliver a Brexit that gets Britain COMPLETELY unshackled from the EU. This does not mean, that some of the worries of the remainers should not be addressed. They should be addressed, among these issues the scare among newly migrated EU citizens to Britain, how do we tackle that. Or the complaints about fisheries and so on. There are numerous issues that need tackling. But freedom as a principle is what the majority of the Brits want.

You can see it on the last bump we had after the peace we made with mr. Farage. Why did we get some extra support from that, because it gives people hope, that we will deliver at Brexit that is actually full of independence.

It is the prospect of freedom that inspires people. Beat that drum, be honest, and show people, that in the long run, Britain will be free. As you yourself admonished mr. Johnson, ending up with a Canada plus agreement would be all fine and beautiful.

2. There is a huge scare and rightful angst of all the violence done by extreme islamists in the UK. The terrorattack yesterday is just one incident in a string of many incidents. Giving a realistic answer to a way of tackling that issue, will be your final argument in the election, I think.

Just as there always is that defining moment for everybody else in an election, the INTERNAL security threat of Islamism, is a problem that needs to be tackled head on.

Repatriation, focus on extreme Islam and all these methods will get you comfortably into number 10.

Then don’t misunderstand mr. Corbyn. He is a good man, and people can tell that when they listen to him. He is actually not an apparatchik. He truly believes in what he preaches, and that will win a lot of hearts over to his cause.

As a Jew myself, off cause I am very critical towards all the criticism that has landed on his table. This is serious. But he believes in his own ideas, and people like that.

So if and when you criticize him. Don’t go after the man, go after the ball. Because the alliance with Hamas and other such abhorrent organizations may be done after a fashion of good faith, but these organizations are not good.

But don’t underestimate him, he is a good fighter, and he believes in his ideas. In fact, I like him much better than mr. Milliband, that seemed very much like an apparatchik.

What we need is faith and power, not just another talking head.

G-d bless the fair isles of Britain.

I have been a long time silent on the Middle Eastern issue, that of Israel and the rest of the Middle East.

When I was commenting on the development under mr. Barack Obama, we saw an amazing development aimed at peace. We actually had a few years without so much bloodshed in Israel, and generally in the Middle East.

This seems to have been forgotten these days, rockets are flying over Israel, and in Iran cyber security is the new frontier.

I am truly sorry. I do not speak for all of Jews, only for myself essentially, but with some support from Jews around the world.

What do we do, to stop the fighting?

First of all, my claim is, that through an equal balance between Iran and Israel, there is a chance for peace.

As long as there is inequality in terms of power, there will be war.

But if we, through dialogue, actually seek to find some understanding of each other. There is a small chance of getting back unto the track of peace.

This is my opinion, and though I know that it may drown in the wailing of the sirens, it must be said.

G-d bless the peace we can find in the Middle East.

There is a reason why, I do not comment very much on the British election. The reason is not because I do not follow the battle, but simply because it seems to me, that there is not much to comment on.

The great problem was, initially, to make some kind of peace between the upstart mr. Farage, and the established, mr. Johnson.

That is actually working right now. I believe, that there is a beautiful balance between the two parties. Mr. Farage is still in the constest, and has the ability to protest, if the promises about post Brexit is not met by mr. Johnson, and mr. Johnson has a clean run on number 10.

How come, that we are in this situation, where there is so little to fight against and for?

I have been asking myself that question over and over again. There is no simple answer. But there is the complex answer, that the middle leaning compromises of the day is working. That is a mix of pro British business plan, heightened security, a focus on healthcare and a high profile in foreign politics.

Exactly the mix that mr. Obama won with in his election term number two. That is the second term of his presidency.

It is simply a winning mix.

Add to this a mild criticism of Islam, and there you have it, a good manifesto.

There will be more conflicts up and ahead. Among them; internal conflicts between the many ethnicities of the current UK, foreign conflicts as the one with China, potential rivalry with the EU. But all these conflicts, dangerous as they may be, are possible to handle, and there are many roads of action in front of us.

What is given, I would say, is the closer relationship with the US. Both UK and the US really need each other in an increasingly hostile world. Again the conflict in and around China is set to go off at any moment now, and the UK have their former crown colony Hong Kong to worry about. In this conflict the US and the UK share common interest.

So, welcome to a new world, where the “anglosphere” is once again trying to mend the fences, and getting “great again”, whatever that means.

There are many potential conflicts up and ahead, but at least now we have a good fighting change. We had not before.

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

Well, there is a bit of a conflict within the Democratic Party, as the middleman (I have a good name in both camps), please let me give you a perspective that might serve as a bridge between the new radical ideological perspective, and that of Obamanism.

First of all, in the original theoretical socialist perspective, there has never been simple answers. In the beginning, in France (that is at the time when the US was founded), it was mainly a platonic ideology, mixed up with a great deal of Aristotleanism.

Since neither Plato or Aristotle are simple, the ideas of that time was neither.

At the next phase of socialism, it was neither simple. Especially Karl Marx put his mark on socialism, and was thus a conduit of the mainly French ideology of that time.

Things Change, and the ideas of Marx are not necessarily viable for today, but rather the legacy of the man will carry through in some of his ideas, but not all.

If we confront ourselves with the legacy of Marx, there are some things that did work, but is forgotten today, and some things that did not work, but still seems to be a important thing to many socialists.

Let me explain. Marx was essentially a Neoplatonist like I am. He pointed to Sparta as the ideal society, and tried to build a societal structure that reflected that of Sparta. That is why it is called communism, because that was what Sparta was, a community of soldiers meeting in the mass everyday.

At the same time, he took another thing of Plato, that of dialectism. He essentially saw the world as a development between two points of extreme arguments.

Now, Marx was right in using dialectism, but wrong in copying Sparta in the way he copied Sparta. He went against Lycurgus (the founding philosopher of Sparta), and preached open borders. According to Lycurgus, that is the one thing you cannot do, if you want a well functioning community. Any community needs borders.

So to be honest and realistic about a state that has strong communal value, you need to close the borders.

Again, this is not to argue for a closed world, it is simply to point out the inherent theoretical flaw in the ideology.

Anyway, I get lost in the theoretical discussion.

My basic point is; what we have missed lately in the socialist thinking, and what really work, is dialectism.

The view of the world, that takes into account, that we need more political perspectives in one political perspective, to make the ideas to work.

My economic philosophy is one example. That there are two factions within the business community, those who are loyal to the country, and those who are not loyal to the country. What we do to make an economy work is to support the businessmen who are loyal to the country, and criticize those who are not loyal.

See the dialectics in that?

Or my take on Islam. Here I tried to use the dialectic approach on Islam in the sense, that I deemed Muslims who are into political Islam as islamists, and Muslims who accepts and support democracy and democratic law as Muslims to be supported.

I mean, we have to fight terror, but definitely not all Muslims.

Again a dialectical approach.

Marx was, as the inherent Neoplatonist, right in this view.

I believe, that in practical political implementation, this works. The US is having an economic boom, the workers are back in jobs, and we have reached some kind of tentative peace with most of the Muslim world.

That is a prove of concept.

So for now, in the internal discussion within the Democratic Party, use that knowledge to breach the gaps, and build bridges. Try to find the extremes of your arguments, and then see the syntheses.

That will carry you all through, without that dangerous fractioning of the party.

We are not all right, but we all have a bit of the right view each of us. Through dialectism, we can find that common ground.

G-d bless the common ground we may find.

There is a challenge in the Democratic Party in these days. We try to find a way to move forward in a political climate that is, honestly, poisonous.

Can we, is there any way, that we can be inspired by the ancients in this regard.

Well, there are one or two wise men, that could teach us something if we try to understand what they are saying.

Democracy is founded, many say, by a little obnoxious character in the classical citystate of Athens.

In the classical time, this questionable character wandered around in the streets of Athens, and did some wonderous things. He was the soul of Athens, that city of an amazing cultural beauty.

This guy had a name, he had the name of Socrates.

Now, we say, that Democracy has the quality of freedom, and is the enemy of the tyrant. How is this exactly?

Well, what is a tyranny? A tyranny is a system, where the rulers do not listen to the people, but force their will onto the people.

But there is an interesting facet of tyrannies, that we often do not understand or think so much about. That is the fact, that tyrannies are never without ethics. Tyrannies are the opposite of freedom, it has all the rules of the world. Tyrannies are political systems where a bunch of rules regulate the people. Telling them what to do, sometimes down to the smallest detail.

The tyrants never see themselves as bad people, on the contrary, they see themselves as very good people. They have values and virtues, that they seek to impose on the people, for their own good, off cause.

This is where Socrates comes in, because he has this solution onto the problem of rulers, who see themselves as knowing better than everybody else.

He himself, who was, no doubt, one of the wisest men of Athens, went around in Athens and asked the people there about things. He asked the poets, the politicians and the soldiers. And they all “had the answer”.

Then Socrates thought about it, and he knew, that he DID NOT have the answer.

So he thought. I must be the wisest of all, because I know, that I do not know everything.

In other words, the wisdom and quality of Democracy is the knowledge, that you may have some answers, but you know that you don’t know everything. So you are open for a debate.

That is the core of Democracy, that you are open to what other people have of ideas and questions. This makes the Democratic republic move forward in true wisdom and with respect for those who are citizens of said republic.

Maybe we don’t know everything. Maybe we are not those who are the best in defining ethics and what is right and wrong. Just maybe Socrates was on to something.

So, this is the message of today, be open minded, don’t bury yourselves in “I know it all attitudes”. But listen to what other people have to say. I mean, perhaps even at the other side of the aisles there are actually principles and ideas that we can adopt and work on.

In that way, we try to avoid the fractioning of the great nation of the US in secluded and closed groups.

By that, we try to make unity again. Because, that is the core of the United States of America.

G-d bless that revolutionary idea, that we all love. G-d bless that beautiful nation. G-d bless that home of the brave and the land of the free.

A lot of the ideas, that Barack and I had, have now become a integral part of the Democratic Party. Let me explain.

First of all, economics.

Barack and I criticized the movement of jobs from America to overseas, especially to China. This took jobs from a lot of hard working Americans, and left them in poverty. Whole cities that used to be dynamic working class cities have ended up in ruin, as Detroit among others.

So we set out to get the jobs back, and we suceeded actually. This is the reason why the US is in good repair these days, and the jobs are there. Especially working class jobs. That is also jobs for people of a Latin American, African and Middle East background. Not only classical workers.

How did we do that?

Well, by understanding the mindset of businesspeople, and understanding the theory behind free markets.

First the business people. There are, roughly, two kinds of business people. The good guys, and the bad guys. The good guys are hard working industrialists, who are very patriotic. They build things, and support the local community with money for education health care and so on. They care. Like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.

What they are really into, is making wonderful products, not just making money.

At the other hand, there are the consultants and private equity. They have no responsibility towards anything, country, faith or anything. It is all just a matter of making money. So they have been behind most of the outsourcing of jobs. As we called Mitt Romney “chief of outsourcing”. That is not good for the American worker, that is not good for the American economy, and it is extremely bad for the military, because the military is dependent on a strong industry.

So what we did was to support the good guys like Apple and Microsoft, and punished the bad guys like the outsourcers.

This is a TWO WAY method. Only punishing will not work, only supporting will not work either. It is about supporting the good guys and punishing the bad guys.

The beauty of the method is, that the business people are often in agreement. They are also Americans, and most of them are loyal towards the country, they just need a little prodding.

So, instead of seeing the business people as inherently bad, we need to see them for what they are. Some bad, some good.

A positive take on the issue is off cause, to focus also on some of the good guys. Put up Apple as a good example. They moved a lot of their production back to the US. I mean, they are a leading company, we should promote their loyalty towards the working class. They are themselves liberal.

Also Facebook are liberal, and they keep a lot of the production in the US. Another good example.

My point is, the strategy was taking in a method that used both stick and carrot. Only using stick is seen as bad manners, and honestly it alienates a lot of American business.

Capitalism is at the heart of the US, but sometimes is looses its loyalty towards the country, and then it is ok to step in. But if it keeps its loyalty, it should have all the praise, tax reduction and general approval we can give it. Because industry contributes a lot to solve all kinds of problems, and pushes the country forward in a positive manner.

Making ALL business villains is not a good thing, we need to be sharp on the nuances of these issues.

Do that, and the country as such will prosper, not to mention that it makes a lot of jobs to working class people.

G-d bless the will to see things as they are in a complex world, and use a bit of wisdom.

Mr. Obama has delivered quite a blistering criticism of the current development of the Democratic Party. It is going away in a very left wing conspiracy or direction.

It is as though that mr. Trump forces us to be desperate.

We do things in terms of politics, that we would normally not do.

Well, perhaps we should just try and take a look at the reality. Most of what mr. Trump has had succes with, is actually Socialdemocratic policies, especially in terms of economics. But also foreign policy, here I think of the conflict with China.

So in fact, we do not have to look for a political system that will actually work. We can just look at what is actually working. Ok, then mr. Trump has installed some kind of borders and ICE. But that is something we would have done ourselves anyway. Maybe not in such a harsh manner, but some kind of control is necessary.

So, maybe we should take it a bit easy, and go on from when mr. Obama was president. Just continue.

What we need, is a good candidate. I truly hope we get one of those.

G-d bless United States of America.

I just want to deliver a rare praise of a politician. I have been the supporter of many, many politicians over the last 15 years, in Great Britain, it has been mr. Cameron, mrs. May and now mr. Johnson.

It is very rare with a politician of such a caliber as mr. Johnson. He is at the level of mr. Obama, but just in a bit different political perspective.

That is always a true joy to work with. As a result, the election is going quite well, and the possible results after the election are promising.

We should however be realistic about the challenges. We are looking at a rebirth of the British empire, but that is not going to be easy.

There are a lot of steps to take to reach that goal.

But mr. Johson is the right man for the job.

Well done Boris, I will look forward to hear an ode or two of Homer in the future. Such beauty and wisdom is well received in the halls of learning that is Great Britain.

G-d bless the fair isles of Great Britain.

Well done mr. Farage, the sacrifice that you did in relation to the election will go down into history, as one of the finest moments of UK democracy. Let me explain.

In the olden times, before the Roman Empire, when the Canutes were ruling in the UK, there was this saying. The saying went: In order for the tree to grow, it must be watered by the blood of the heroes.

In other words, the Ask Ygrassil, the world tree needs sacrifice in order to live. You have just brought one of those sacrifices to your country. Giving Boris a clean run on the path to number 10.

This will ensure, that England will yet live. Yes, there are innumerable hurdles and difficulties ahead, but now when the UK is free to plot its own course, we can work with these challenges.

So, you have just won yourself a place in the halls of famous Englishmen along such esteemed men as Marlborough and Nelson.

So, there will a huge work in front of us, that I will try to cover, not least the ailing NHS and the wealthfarestate as such. This part of the state is in dire needs of repair, and an intelligent as well as no nonsense approach to it, will rescue it. But it will be tough.

Anyway, now we can finally work on some of the issues, that have been dormant for quite a long time now. Saving Britain from the collapse it was approaching.

Please, let G-d save the United Kingdom.

Listen Boris, I have been a commentator on A LOT of elections. I only lost one over the years, and that was the election where mr. Trump got elected. Even that election was a half win, since mr. Trump still is a reader here at Rubicon.

The first mistake that is often done in elections, is unrealistic projections. To win, you need to be painfully honest to yourself. What are REALLY the ups and downs of a election.

The thing is, you CANNOT win on the deal you have made with the EU. This I do not say to say you have not done your best. But the fact of the matter is, that only through a friendship with mr. Farage are you going to have the support you need to win in the different boroughs of the UK. Why? Because if he decides to fight you in all of the UK, you will loose too many seats.

So you HAVE to come to some kind of agreement with mr. Farage.

He doesn’t support the EU agreement, so you need to find a way to make some kind of compromise.

The second problem with the deal, is, according to my friend Melanie Philips, the fact, that the agreement does not live up to the expectations of the electorate. To be honest, I do not really know the ins and outs of the agreement, but I know the voters. They want to be free. That is it, not more not less.

If the UK is still tied to the EU after the Brexit, they will be mad as, I don’t know, something not so good.

Thirdly, there is the Queen to consider. I know, that she does not have a political role to play directly. But she is the caretaker of the empire, and she wants to get out. Because the empire is suffering.

Getting on the wrong side of the Queen, is not a good place to be. She deserves our respect.

So, as I see it, you need to make some kind of deal with mr. Farage. I know, that it goes against the ingrained self respect that comes with being an Oxford alumni. But this is not about you, it is about the country, and there working with an upstart as Farage is needed to get the majority in house.

As we used to say, united we stand, divided we fall. It is the same in this situation.

You have to bite that apple, and after that, you will win as sure as the suns rises on Brasenose college.

G-d bless the will of the people.

The election in the UK is really problematic. Specifically in the conservative camp, where mr. Farage and mr. Johnson are two combatants fighting over the issue of Brexit. They are both Brexiteers, but have two different takes on, what Brexit is.

To mr. Farage it is no deal, to mr. Johnson it is deal made with the EU.

Let me give you a bit of a taste of what we experience right now in Denmark, maybe this could shed some light on what will happen if we make a deal.

I have just been instrumental in devising a rejection of ISIS warriors return to Denmark. The political agreement went through the entire parliament, and gave the ruling Socialdemocrats a huge boost in terms of electional support.

That is all well, but then the EU went into the issue, and have done two things. Firstly they have decreed that Denmark should accept more migrants. Not directly targeted at the ISIS issue, but as a probable spin off of the discussion here in Denmark. It was decreed by the ECJ, that is the judges of the EU. We cannot but say that we do not like the verdict, we are powerless in face of the ECJ. Hence there is no freedom there.

Secondly, and that is even more worrisome. The EU has financed a report branding Denmark all kinds of evil things as Islamophobes and so on and so forth. We have been very careful to not target all Muslims in condemning ISIS, I mean few other Muslims like ISIS.

So condemning ISIS cannot be islamophobia.

But even worse, the EU has worked together with mr. Erdogan of Turkey on the report.

That is the virtue of the EU, and something the UK could be met with, if the UK does not tear itself free from all the strings attached.

Therefor, my idea of a Brexit is, as mr. Farage, no deal. That is the only way that the UK is absolutely sure, that it is not confronted with absurd demands by the bureaucracy.

I like some of the stances of the EU, but the way they have treated Denmark lately is not ethical in any way. We are very careful not to tread on anyone’s toes, specifically not all Muslims. We differ.

So such a blunt attempt at controlling the migration efforts and reflection of Denmark is abuse of the vested power into the EU.

You should see the EU for what it is, and act accordingly.

G-d bless the will of the people.

How do we understand the current election in the UK?

Well, there is a classic parrallel, that might shed some light on the calamities and challenges of the UK.

In the ancient time, there was an empire. But it was a very speciel empire in the sense, that it never really fought any wars, and was essentially based on trade.

That was the empire of the Phoenicians.

In the beginning of the Phoenician empire, no one but the Phoenicians managed to roam the seas as them. They had amazing shipbuilding capabilites, and were to construct beautiful vessels of commerce.

Through commerce they became rich and thriving.

They kept very much to themselves, isolating themselves in citystates as Tyre.

As time went by, the neighbours of the Phoenicians, a small tribe of no significance, started abusing the Phoenicians, attacking their cities and burning them down.

Industrious as the Phoenicians were, they rebuilt their cities fast, hence creating a myth about a certain bird of Phoenix.

But the peaceful Phoenicians became tired of all the fighting and abuse, and created walled cities from where they could conduct their business. This stopped the eternal cycle of abuse done by the primitives in their vicinity.

Perhaps it is time for Great Britian to shed the shackles of the abuse? Perhaps it is time for England to turn its gaze away from the continent that has never given them anything really?

Perhaps it is time to accept that in order to be free, one needs to sever the attatchments.

There is an empire that needs tending, and as the Phoenicians, perhaps only through forging a new path without a stranglehold by Bruxelles, the empire will rise again, as the bird Phoenix.

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

I have been doing my own things here in Denmark for the last 1 1/2 year. Mainly trying to make a living that is not tied to work that will eventually slowly grind my body into a lot of malfunctioning parts. That is what happens when you have to work manually, and hard work at that.

But finally I am here, I have landed a job that will be both artistic, bleeding edge in terms of new tech and then, hopefully, not that hard to do. Art needs joy to work.

Again, that will, hopefully, make me able to continue blogging, and again, hopefully, the work I have could potentially merge with my blogging.

As a director of a small tv station focused on political debate, blogging and interviews could go hand in hand.

Anyway, that is still a few month ahead of us. Let us look at some of the theoretical ideas that Barack and I had in the Middle East that, arguably, made the US the sole leader of the world.

It has never happened before, but we had everybody behind us in the fight against the Islamic State.

Imagine that.

Anyway, to understand the doctrine, you need to have a look on where we came from, and the development of media.

Before the internet, you could hide all your machinations quite well. An example of this is the first true theoretician in terms of media, that of Goebbels. He kind of coined how we used media until the advent of the internet. He is still quite liked in and around a lot of the powerhouses in the world.

Essentially Goebbels used dark magic to control the populace. He used things as small words loaded with an evil meaning. You have those words still in use; racism, globalism, islamophobia and so on. What you do, is to load a word with an intent to control the populace. Goebbels used it to control the Germans and kill Jews.

It may sound a little scary, and it is. The Nazies used a lot of strange esoteric ideas and principles, that we do not even know about today. And they did it in a Faustian way. That is the Goethe way of giving the devil something in order to gain something. It works, but it is essentially evil.

In the Cold War, these principles were applied to the fight between Russia and the US. Through subterfuge and manipulation a lot of the actual fightings were conducted. It was only possible, if you controlled the media. Because as soon as media was given free, people actually realized what was going on, and started getting really mad.

As a result, manipulation is the worst thing you can do in a war. Because people tend to realize it, and be angry at you.

At the other hand, if you are very careful to do everything ethically, people will also realize this, and support you.

I called it the principle of Brasidas, named after a Spartan soldier who got a lot of support in the Pellepones war simply by being honourable.

In fact fighting needs to turn itself 180 degrees to meet the advent of the internet.

Now there has been a kind of purge of the internet, trying to put a kind of shroud around the truth again. But it never really works. A good example about this is the ever painful treatment of mr. Tommy Robinson. He never seems to be going away, why? Because of the internet. There are always someone who are willing to cover his tragic story. The internet allows for everybody to follow his story. The same goes for mr. Trump. He uses mostly new media, not old media.

We know what is going on.

In an open world, the most honourable will win.

That is the true background behind the crisis of the Kurds. Because it was obviously very unfair. A good, honourable people were sold to a tyrant.

That is very bad pr. for the US.

So, the way powerstruggling works these days, is by understanding the Brasidas principle. That is, honourable wars gain support.

I think that the current mood of the Middle East proves this. Nobody really liked the sellout of the Kurds, especially in the US, where the new mode of communication ties in with the spirit of the US.

The reason why the US is so well suited as a leader in these days, is because the starting point of the US. That of the American Revolution, is all about honesty.

So rekindling the ancient and good principles of the founding fathers is what is really the best way to work.

Do that, and you see that there is a chance of success in the great game of power.

See?

It is all about being a good man, and a good powerhouse.

G-d bless the will to do good.