Well, it seems to me. That the entire EU bloque wants to be the leader of the world.

There are several prerequisites to this however.

1. You need to stop trying to harass and subdue me. I know, that this is the direct order of the Danish civil system, but you need to prevent it. I cannot work, and honestly it would not make much sense to work for the EU system if you at the same time try to kill me.
2. You need to rearm. Especially Germany, the largest country needs to rearm. This is difficult due to the lack of confidence since the Second World War. But that is the aim. Make sure, that there are no pro Erdogan officers in the force. They are a potential danger.
3. We need to make sure, that the migration threat is controlled. By that I mean, WE have to take responsibility, and turn it around.
4. We need to reform the system, so that it reflects the current intellectual level. We have a rennaissance in Europe now, the civilization should reflect it. I need a hands up on this, to keep churning out ideas is a waste of time, if it is not used.

G-d bless the European Union.

The situation of the Middle East have gone from peaceful to total chaos in just two days. That is the way it is with an area that is embroiled in war, and has been for the last 5000 thousand years.

Such a violent area is not going to go hippie peaceful within the next 200 years. It can be ok, there can be limits and so on. But total peace is just not possible in an area where there are so many different factions and civilization was born.

One thing that actually did work, was to put an end to nuclear armament. Yes, I know that it was not perfect, but it actually worked where it should, stopping the proliferation of nuclear warheads.

I dont know if the strategy of Mr. Trump and Mr. Bolton will work. Increased pressure on an adversary that was born because the US failed it? I don’t think so, but I was surprised by the peace solution of North Korea, so why not?

If it does not work however, we have enterede a total new situation, where things may just go into total chaos and the Middle East will be wrought in even more war than today.

We will see, the next 48 hours will be giving us an answer, the alternative is a renewed effort of the European states to be a peacekeeper.

G-d bless the will to find peace.

When you look at Human rights, you see a list of rules. If you do not know anything about law, you would presume, that the rules are the important.

With this, you a very wrong.

Take another system of laws, that of the book of Moses, the Torah. That is also a long list of laws, but beneath all the laws, there are certain principles that guide the laws. The first of it is reciprocity. That is, the evil deed you do, must be met with a punishment equal to the wrong done.

You can call it an eye for an eye, or look at the scales by the goddess of justice.

The point is, there is an IDEOLOGICAL idea behind the system of law.

If we here in Europe are going to 1. Play a leading role in international politics. 2. Reform our own system so that it actually works. We need to understand the PRINCIPLES behind the law system that is supposed to guide us, Human rights.

The virtue that we are talking about is Justice.

Justice is the aim of law.

So, the pertinent question is; what is justice?

Here we are faced with a philosophical question, that is not solved ultimately, but has facets that we can discuss. Remember, we are wanting to spread European culture, so we need to understand it.

The first starting point in understanding what justice is, is by going back to its roots.

They are, Babylon/Ur and Egypt.

The Mesapotamian development 4 – 5 thousand years back is what we are truly still working with today. But Egypt, that was the other great power player at that time, has a unique understanding of justice, that we need to understand as well.

According to Hammurabi, justice is protection of the weak. You can see it on human rights, all the different parties we seek to protect, are parties that are potentially weak. So that is why we put in all the articles.

Sometimes it has to be revised, if a party that used to weak becomes strong and abuses the system. As we have the problem with violent migrants in Europe. They are not weak anymore, but strong and abuse the idiocy of the current Human Rights leadership to their advantage.

The world changes, and the weak is now women of Europe who are abused in many different ways. So, Human rights needs to see the change.

But back to justice and Egypt. According to ancient Egyptian lore, justice is what is true.

The Egyptians, the original humanists, had a faith in truth as the divine motor of justice. There is a very famous story about a peasant that is wrongly accused of taking land from a wealthy land owner. He calls upon TRUTH to be the divine protection in his case.

So we have social justice and truth as the motor of laws.

That is someting we at the liberal part of the politcal spectrum can admit to. The difficult thing is then the CHANGE.

How do we actually look upon these values and virtues today. I suppose it takes a philosopher to CHANGE the perspective.

But everybody can actually do it, it just takes an investment in poor and disenfranchised and human heart filled with true honesty to understand it.

This will break some taboos, and create a whole new perspective, and that is, rightly the leadership of the Human rights council that are supposed to do that. But they are not strong enough intellectually and has a deep enough integrity to do that. So I have to step in.

I know that this may seem as humiliating, but the alternative is the dismantling of the system itself, so I have to be a little tough on these things. To keep the integrity of the system.

G-d bless the willingness to Change.

When there is a new situation with an international agreement, well, then we have to change the way we deal with international arrangements.

As the Iran deal has been scrapped by the US, things are different in the Middle East.

I do not think that the Iranians are prone to react positively on renewed pressure, especially since the deal was made together with so many other powers, so that they can see, that if they hold on to the arrangements all that will happen is that the adversaries of Iran will be split.

But that is the way it is, by doing absolutely nothing, Iran can put in a wedge between the Western powers.

So what do the European powers do now, with all this new international clout?

It has been a while since the European powers have played an international role, so we might as well try to start remembering how it was.

Essentially it comes down to skill with the international game.

You can be a small player materially, like Denmark, and still play a leading role. If you have the cultural and intellectual capabilities.

But the core of international diplomacy is not diplomacy, but raw military power.

So, we can start our adventure here, but we need to invest heavily in armament to fulfill the promise we have.

We need to make new weapons, and use a great deal more of our money on that.

Secondly, we have to focus on the immediate challenges ahead of us.

That is migration and IS.

We have a stronger profile in Middle Africa, but we need to capitalize on the money and investments we send that way. There should be only one serious demand. The countries must admit their citizens back if they are caught in Europe.

At the same time, the military fight they have in Africa is as well our fight. The radical IS backed guerrillas there needs to be stopped.

But we need to push the African Nations to start taking their people back.

If we add serious border control to this strategy, then we have a solution to the migration issues.

The same goes for the Middle East, to get European help, you need to accept your citizens back. We will help, support and build infrastructure. But as soon as there is an option for the migrants to go back, they must.

That is our priority.

Add to this, I believe that we should make peaceful agreements to all who want that.

We should also keep out of the Sunni/Shia competition. As long as they stay clear of Israel, all we wish to do, is to make peace.

G-d bless the will of peace.

The core of European culture, as of now, is Human rights.

But what are these Human rights; a set of rules and regulations that I have pressed into a new direction.

How may I do this a mere philosopher. Add to this a renegade, a troublemaker, and a recipient of torture, harassment by the state, radical muslims and many, many others.

Essentially Human rights is a set of laws. That is the essence, and then you may ask, laws, ok but these are just rules right?

Well, laws are not just rules, laws are a system of a philosophical theory that goes all the way back Hammurabi, the Babylonian king who invented law as we have it today.

So, what was it, that Hammurabi really wanted with his laws. You can trace it back over Plato, who is the foremost describer og natural law we have.

In essence what he claims is, that law is a states protection of the weak.

Civilization is a state that protects the weak against the strong.

If we live without law, the strongest will rule. But law protects people who may not be strong, so that even the weak can have a nice living.

So law is a social protection system.

That is the core of Human rights, to support laws, so that the weak are not preyed upon by the strong.

Lately the natural law discussion have turned the very foundation and meaning with law upside down. Many judges see their purpose as protecting the evil doer. By using the hallowed halls of justice to protect rapists and murderers.

By doing that, law itself is in danger of loosing its purpose and support by the European people.

THAT is why I have been adamant in my attempt to change the direction of Human rights to its basis.

According Heraclitus, Law is like the inner wall of a city. If the citizens take the law into themselves, law is upheld and the rule of the strong is curbed by people themselves.

THAT is civilization, and that is the aim of Law. To be so accepted by the citizens, that they automatically adhere to it.

If I had not lifted the handbrake forcefully, the inner adherence to the law, may have broken down in Europe, because of lack of understanding by the human rights council.

So, I urge you to reconsider the very essence of Human rights, and see it as it is.

A SOCIAL system, where the strong, the criminal is put down by law enforcement so that the weak may be safe.

We fight for the kids, the elderly, the ones without a home, the lonely, the poor.

Those are the ones we protect, so lift yourselves up to a new understanding of Law and civil rights, and fight for it.

When you see that a girl is raped, don’t protect the rapist. Protect the girl.

When a homeless man is kicked and abused, don’t protect the kicker, protect the homeless man.

Otherwise, you are making YOURSELVES criminal, and that was not the intention of Law.

G-d bless Hammurabi, the inventor of Law.

Change is, to me, to understand the theories that our forefathers made in their situation, and then reapply new theories to tackle the situation you are in today.

Take Marx, he lived in an age, where the industrialization began. I think all agree, that the industrial Great Britain needed Change in their time. The Workers were living in terrible conditions, and even his eminence, Winston Churchill admitted this, and Changed it.

I dont know if many people know, but Winston Churchill was a Socialist in his younger days, and put in the wealth fare state in the UK.

Today however, the problems are not that Workers are living in terrible living conditions, but the fact that the European Union doesn’t have a clue about political architecture. So, taking a bit of Socialism and a bit of Democracy and then let the Banks run the rest, is a bad idea.

You need the philosophers to run the show. Because we are the ones who actually know how to make a political system.

You know, if you have a house where the roof is leaking, the floor is half rotten, the staircase fallen apart. What do you do? You call a carpenter to fix the house.

So if the carpenter tells you you need a straight staircase, a new roof and a new floor the what do you do? You look at your purse and see if you can afford it, you do not plot how to kill the carpenter. That is a stupid strategy, sorry.

So, there is only one carpenter available in town, that is me. So, instead of trying to kill, look at your purse, and see if you afford my services.

Off cause, it will not cost you anything to hire me. But it will cost you, if you do not get your house in order.

You cannot afford it.

So, I will help you, but stop being so stuck on knowing about carpentry. You DO NOT know anything about how a house is supposed to be build, you just need a place to live.

Leave it to the professionals who took a long education, worked as a carpenter for a long time, and then as a result actually know how to fix a house.

If you then follow his instructions, down to the very letter, you may just end up having a brand new house.

You want oaken planks and a brand new kitchen, no problem. Just DONT KILL THE CARPENTER!!!

G-d bless the will to be humble in the face of realizing, that you know nothing. But that will make you the wisest guy in Athens.

There is one overriding problem with the European Union, that is the fact it works against a force that no political construct has ever been able to work against. The needs of the people.

Essentially the negative end of a political construct is the needs of people. That is the red line a political architecture cannot cross. Take the Tzar regime in Russia, when people did not have anything to eat, they rebelled. The NEED to eat was not met, and the empire went down. The same happened in France, it was not the briliance of the ideas of the French philosophers that really started the revolution, it was the fact, that people had nothing to eat.

The same problem is now prevalent in Europe, you cannot make a political construct, and then reduce the security situation to lethal to the people living in it.

The problem, aside from the obvious moral problem, is the fact, that it will not work as a political construct. The NEEDS of the people to have security and peace is not met, so they rebel.

At the other end, the true aim of a political system is harmony. This is created bu using the tools in the toolbox. That is law, democracy as the core, and then added systems as free trade, loyalty of production to the nation and so on.

You can also make a wealthfarestate if you have the resources and the system is hermetically closed.

See? Political architecture is an art form, and so far we have been really bad at it in Europe, and the result is rebellion and destruction.

What you need to do, is to fix it by understanding the principles of government ship.

But first of all, you need to meet the NEEDS of the people. Right now the need to be safe.

G-d bless the will to truly understand civilization.

To Change the European Union, one has to understand, the problems that the union see.

At the core of it, is a principle that Marx got all wrong.

Marx wanted to make a copy of the Spartan state, that is the ancient city state of the Greek classical world.

Whereas the French Revolution was a renaissance for Democracy, that is, in the classical times Athens, the Communist revolution was an attempt at remaking the Spartan state.

That is a communal state where no-one owns anything, and the state is the family of the Spartans.

Well, the great fault of Marx was, that Lycurgus, the philosopher who founded Sparta was quite clear about one thing, in fact that was the very prerequisite of the Spartan state. It was to be hermetically closed.

Spartans were spartans, not anybody else.

Hence, the ability to make a communal state.

If you look at Marxist states around the world, you can see, that only Marxist states that are actually closed work. Or rather, they do not disintegrate as Communist states usually do due to a flawed political architecture (Marx was pretty shallow when it came to truly understanding Sparta).

EU is essentially an attempt on making a Social-democratic state.

It is flawed for exactly this reason. You cannot wish to make a Democratic/Socialist state, and then make it open.

It does not work that way, Lycurgus says it, and he is a philosopher on a higher level than Marx.

So, that is really the remedy of the current problems. Each people should have borders around them, and the general borders should be enforced.

That is the key, to make Europe have a come back. In the meantime, off cause some of the barbarian migrants who are here, must be remigrated. Not all are barbarians, but some are, and those who do not accept and respect our laws tear down the cohesion of the society, bring destruction to states.

They cannot be allowed that.

So, put in borders around people, to make them save, and make the socialist wealthfare-states working again.

This way, we heed the principles of Sparta, the true principles of Sparta.

That is the only way it can work, otherwise we should stop Socialism, because a flawed political architecture is some of the most devastating and destructive in the world.

Look at the world today, see all the devastation these flawed ideas have brought, and be honest about it.

G-d bless the European Union.

We are actually making a turn around in Europe. When I first started politics, it was as a rebel in SIAD. I still remember how I descended upon Bruxelles and almost tore Belgium into pieces. Some ten years ago.

After that, Ms. Helle Thorning Schmidt was tasked with shutting me up, something she was so thorough with, that she almost killed me, and started torturing my little daughter.

That was actually the first spark to start the Ukraine war.

The EU system was, at that point, very far down the lane of inhuman action. Ok, they did not control Thorning Schmidt, so off cause it is not really their fault, the fault lies at the feet of that …., never mind.

So, now I have become a well established blogger, with a load of clear wins for the Western democratic system behind me. Especially the run I did with mr. Obama was a clear humanistic/democratic victory.

So, there is only one who can change the narrative of Europe, and, even though I loath to put myself forward, it is me.

But, I mean, there has been bumps on the road right?

You almost condoned the actions of Thorning Schmidt. And so far, I have not seen that branch of olive pointing my way.

There are no medals on my breast or anything.

You could have given me an excuse, but you just wanted to control me.

But, my role is not to put myself first, it is to put you first. To make people of Europe thrive and be happy. That is my role, if I ever become selfish, it does not work.

I believe, that in essence, politics is about sacrifice. The more you sacrifice, the more you make the world better.

My good friend Mr. David Webble a renowned Cornell scholar and a expert in sacrifice (check out his books, they are really, really good) believes that miracles will happen, if you sacrifice yourself.

If you think only about yourself, G-d will not help you.

That is truly the Change I believe that European Union needs to address. How do we help, set ourselves below the citizens, be servants, and not the other way around.

Only a miracle can save Europe now from total collapse. If you need a miracle, you need to pray.

But you also need to shed your own ambition, and serve those who put you at a place of power.

It is not, that you shouldn’t fight for your freedom or your rights. Especially human rights. But it is about doing it for other people, not yourself.

That is the cure, and that is truly the only way.

Be open, humanistic, and have the courage to enlighten the world.

G-d bless a renewed Europe.

It is with the most terrible feeling, that I see what is happening to the UK these days.

The UK is treated like a slave, and poor Mrs. May is not left with a chance to get a deal.

It was the same with Mr. Cameron. The reason why he was toppled was because the EU system did not want to play ball.

Listen, the United Kingdom is one of the greatest and most humane powers the earth has ever witnessed. It lifted humanity from scrabbling for a few scraps of food, to a dazzling civilisation.

This is what we are trying to enslave, by giving mrs. May no room to maneuver.

It is a sin, and a crying shame.

If I were Mrs. Merkel and Mr. Macron I would get on the phone with Mrs. May and ask her what she wants, and how we could do it.

Make a fair deal.

We all need a strong and confident UK when all this negotiations is over. We need the UK to be a powerhouse and a beacon of civilisation as it has the potential to be.

To humiliate the Brits will only get us one angry beast, that will tear out in desperation. A beast that powerful is not something you wish to fight.

So give them an opportunity to make a fair deal. At the same time, reform the system to a more simple and realistically functioning system a UN of Europe.

Then probably the UK will wish to join.

If we do not bind them, but just make a platform to communicate and make arrangements, then why not?

Lets perhaps have a look at ourselves, and see our own faults, instead of believing everybody else are to blame.

Set them free, and they will come back. That is an old proverb of love. And it is the same here.

You cannot chain the ones you love to yourself, but you can set them free, however difficult it is, and they will come back on their own terms.

G-d bless the will to find a fair deal for England.

We are gearing up for a new angle on European power. So, what was really the aim of the European Union? It was to make a system where upon Europe could make a new powerbase.

The idea was, that if we put our ressources together we could be a new player internationally.

Well guess what, this is what is happening when and if the Iran deal will rest on European power.

Europe is a player in its own right once again.

So, since that basic aim of the union is accomplished, maybe it is time to think about what now.

First of all, we need to reform the system. Instead of having a overblown bureaucracy in Bruxelles then make the arrangements locally. So that the things we do in Europe is arranged between the different states.

Cut down the bureaucracy, and send the power back to the national parliaments.

The Union will then be the framework, that the powers will use to make arrangements.

That will work.

Having a grotesque, corrupt, overblown system that nobody wants will in fact tear the system down.

But having a small flexible servant to the nations, and kind of UN system will be much more stable.

G-d bless the will to do the right thing, and Change while we still can.

Concerning the Iran deal, there is a certain profile to it, that now seems to be coming through.

Essentially the European powers want to keep it, and the US together with the leader of Israel wants to scrap it.

What comes after the deal seems to be unclear seen from an American perspective, so in essence, it just seems like a voter promise mr. Trump wants to realize. Good, fair enough, but we here in Europe still need to live very close to the Middle East, and the problems there tend to spill into Europe, so it is in our best interest to work and help the Middle Easterns.

Right now, only Germany and France are a part of the international great power game due to the fact, that the UK is mired in trouble on the homefront.

There is also the fact, that European powers, especially Germany wants to keep peace with Russia as well, so we really have situation, where the ligthposts are shining down a path of peace in and around Europe.

We also have the problem of ISIS brining mayhem to central Africa, to force new waves of migrants. The last time it was an effective weapon of mass destruction. A lot of the European states are still reeling from the impact, and it changes the mood of most european states, from absolute dovishness, to a more hawkish attitude.

Still European politics have not caught up with the development in France and Germany, but threats are threats and we have to meet them somehow.

But back to the Iran deal. It is really in the best interest of European powers to keep the deal.

We do not do this to meddle or threaten Israel in any way. On the contrary, we do it to help the peaceprocess.

We are essentially in the middle between the US and Russia, and we are slowly digging ourselves out of the lethargy of the second world war.

So Europe will, if the Iran deal holds be a great power again.

This will give Europe both benefits as well as problems.

Being a great power means that you can essentially project your will on the world.

Before the second world war, we did it by colonializing the parts of the world that we wanted to control. This is not really an option these days, but an strengthened profile is a possibility.

What we need is the following to realize that role:

1. We need to control the EU bureaucracy. They are supposed to serve us, not the other way around.
2. We need to bolster our military capabilities.
3. We need to enforce a remigration of IS operatives in Europe, and by that also the “swamp”, that is the backdrop of the IS operatives, all the islamists who are supporting the IS operatives.
4. We need to make sure our borders are working.

The strategy for IS is pretty clear. They want to swamp us with migrants, in order to ruin our states. We need to take a responsible stance to that. Help the African states, but at the same time stop the migrants from coming in, and remigrate them when they enter, have entered, or are on the borders.

We need to realize, that the destabilization of the Central African states is done to fight Europe, and make a sound and serious approach to that.

G-d bless the will of Europe to counter the threats that is there.

The Middle East is changing due to the fact, that Mr. Trump has become president, and we have new players as Mr. Macron.

This is not the first time, that the battlefield changes, but the priorities remain the same, more or less.

First of all, everybody wants peace, but on their own terms. The west wants a more democratic development, the East wants to fortify and solidify its presence.

In the middle we have rogue powers everybody wants to beat, and that unites the two wings, that is Islamic state, that has won an independent status.

It all comes down to Syria, that is the problem right now. That is, there are other fights going on, but because Syria is the last pearl on the string of states Barack and I tried to make democratic in the Arab spring, everybody is involved. Actually Yemen is much worse in terms of warfare and fighting, but that is a feud between Sunni and Shia, so the great powers are not that much involved.

To zoom back to the initial mission, that of spreading democracy in the Middle East. We need to see the fight in this light, I believe.

So seen from a Western perspective, we hope to spread democracy.

How do we do that?

Democracy rests on individual peoples. That is, the Kurds for instance, they are a people, they have taken up the Democratic cause, so they are prime allies to the West.

Mr. Assad is a protector of the Alawite, and a Herdian democratic believer.

There are other factions in Syria, but seen from the perspective of the West, the most probable course of action, to me, is to split the country into ethnic factions, so that each people has a country of their own.

In this country, we off cause need to see a civilized and democratic development.

The whole problem in the Middle East right now is the split of territory that the Western powers made after the first world war. It did not follow any lines of peoples, but was a haphazard and random split. Lawrence of Arabia wanted something else, he wanted the Middle East to be governed by the peoples there. He also had the knowledge of the roots of these peoples, and his plan would have been much better than the plan that was set in action.

Instead of drawing lines on the map. Look at people, give them a home and a place of their own. Somewhere where they can develop peacefully and with control of their own means.

That will give the Middle East some peace.

G-d bless the will to find peace again.

We are facing a rising China, this means, that we need to truly understand what China is.

China is not something new, it is a truly ancient place.

The first few states of China were kingdoms, and truly lost in the veil of time. But they had wisdom and a unique blend of spirituality and system of governance.

The most prominent of them being Con Fut Tze and Lao Tze. On the one hand the bureaucratic idealist, and on the other hand the hippie/poetic liberalist.

Essentially China is mix of these two strands of thought. The conservative being the Confusian bureaucrat with a support of country, family and system, and the other hand the hippie freethinker.

China basically is a bureaucratic state.

This is really the strength of China today, because all Chinese are brought up with the discipline and loyalty to the state. Put this in motion with so many people, and you have a pretty impressive powerful, potentially dominating entity.

Add to this the freshness of their new existence, and you have the same movement as in the Frontier days of the US.

The weakness of the anthill of China however is their inability to give a good fight. They have not fought successfully for themselves since the Vietnam war, and are not a warring people.

The only reason they won in the Vietnam war, was because they were supported heavily by Russia, and Russian are VERY good fighters.

The world has changed a lot since the days of psy ops and media manipulation. So the battle field is new.

Where you in the Cold War could get at the big powers by manipulating the media, this is not possible anymore, because the media has changed dramatically with the advent of the internet.

The truth is there to be found.

This gives the generals a much wider range of possibilities, and it favors brute force.

The Chinese are essentially still living in the Cold War mentality. Focusing on manipulation (cyberwar) and underestimating the force of a united Western force.

They will not live for five minutes.

At the same time, the Chinese are expanding aggressively with bases at sensitive spots around the world, without having the necessary military capabilities to back it up. They are essentially over confident.

This will not continue, as their production base grow, they will be able to support and build more military vehicles.

Anyway, they are not good at classic warfare, so we should meet them there.

Build up our allied forces around them, and if they do not stop their continued siphering of our secrets and steal our production, we should finish off their production capabilities. That will cripple their economy, and set them back to point of start. Then they can rebuild, but at a more sensitive and balanced way.

G-d bless the belief in a sanctioned approach to China.

The world is, strategically divided between different enemies. I am, partially fighting for the West, but still see it as vital to keep a good relationship to the East.

Both Russia and the Anglo Saxons are descendents of searaiders from Scandinavia. So the culture is different in the US and Great Britain, but the outset is the same. The Russians have had a rougher time in around the turn of the 1000 century, with Mongol raiders and ultimately the fall of Constantinople, the Eastern wing of the Roman Empire, that Russia is the heir to.

But they, at the other hand, expanded earlier than the West, in some respects. So their customs and experiences are different.

But, the peacekeeping between East and West is not impossible, if we realize, that we are not so different.

The Russians see Sweden as their mother country, but also have kept good relations to Denmark over the years. Many Russians princesses and queens have come from Denmark. We even have a little Russian church in the centre of Copenhagen.

We in Denmark try and see as our mission to keep the ideas of the Scandinavians as pure and fresh as possible. The fight for freedom and democratic ideas. Add to this the lore of the ancient G-ds.

My name for instance is a viking name, Asger means the tree that upholds middle Earth and Valhalla.

My point is, there is not so much difference between East and West, as one would imagine. There is a possibility for peace, if we shed the veils of ignorance, and see each other for what we are.

We are all pirates originally, we have evolved. But the great, strong, proud warrior, that made the place we now live in, is kin to the other sea pirate that went the other way.

G-d bless the will to make peace between the East and West.

Thank you very much gentlemen. I believe, that if the current saber rattling between east and west had continued, we would have ended up in a third world war.

Just because the media is hysterical, it does not mean, that we cannot remain level headed. It is not the spur of the moment that should decide things as war and warfare. The consequences of the decisions of such things are too severe not to be looked at level headed.

So thank you mr. Trump and thank you mr. Putin for your steadfastness and seriousness in this situation.

It could have ended up in destruction and global war.

If you take a step back, and think about the consequences of that, then you realize, that this should be avoided at all costs.

There are still wars with Islamic state and others, but that is absolutely dwarfed by the mayhem that a third world war would have costed humanity. It would have been the end of the civilized world. Are we ready to go down that path?

So please, let the reconciliation begin, let us talk and not just throw mud at each other, and let us have the courage to look our own beast in its eyes.

I look them in the eyes everyday. I fight islamic state, with honor, and to me they are not so frightening. Yes, I respect them as worthy adversary. And I honor their courage, going up against our machine.

But nevertheless, they are an enemy, and I treat them like that.

That is what we are supposed to do, be men and women of courage.

G-d bless the will to be courageous in the face of strife, and find peace after that fight.

One of the keys for a sustainable Israel, is the connection and fusion of faiths in and around Israel.

As the venerable rav Ashlag prophesied, peace in the world would happen, when there is a common mansion of thought, that all three Abrahamic religions share.

This project, is essentially what will give Israel peace.

How do I know this. It is because, ever since I started this project, Israel has become more and more popular. So Ashlag is right.

It makes sense also, because why would the other religions attack someone who can give them a better understanding of themselves.

The light of Israel is thus a grand project, beyond our imagination.

Please, let us all shed the tears for those have fallen, but then again stop our agression towards those who we do not need to fight.

There is no reason to fight someone you know, and you share a platform with.

G-d bless the peace Israel will give eventually, and happy birthday.

We need to have a closer look at China, and the problems China poses to the West.

The most obvious parallel is the fight between Rome and Phoenicia. You know the fight where Hannibal Barca braved the alps with his war elephants and made a lot of trouble for the Romans.

This is a classic great power battle that does not stem from ideological differences, but because one power rises, and threatens the other power.

Before the rise of Rome, Phoenicia was one of the leading lights of the Mediterranean world, and still holds great honor as, among other things, the inventor of Stoicism.

Phoenicia was a very advanced civilization, that rose through trade, and expanded through a businesslike process of hiring mercenaries at each expansion of its realm.

Rome at the other hand, was a new beast at the arena, young forceful, ressourcefull, sure of itself.

You could draw a parallel and see the West as the Phoenicians and China as Rome.

We are the established, war weary nation, China is the new rising, selfconfident star.

But you could also turn it around. Because we in the West are the children of Rome, and China is not.

The Thycudides trap it is called, when two powers find themselves trapped in a mutual race for power, prestige and ressources.

The problem about the Punic war was, that it was a relentless war. The winner took it all. The escalating conflict made the animosity between Rome and Phoenicia so dire, that Rome eradicated Phoenician totally after they had won. They smashed everything, everything. Buildings, literature, boats.

They made sure, that Phoenicia would never rise again. Totally sure.

This gives a hint of the hatred that Rome felt for its adversary.

So, in comparison with the current war, we should be aware, that if it folds out as in the punic war, the atrocities and mayhem it will bring, will either eradicate us or them.

See what we are up against? THAT is why we need to do our best to prepare, and perhaps defuse the large and true evil conflict.

You may be afraid of the eradication of Chinas production capability. But the alternative is a war where either the West or China wins. If we end up in Punic war theatre, the victor will eradicate the looser totally.

I will cover the China again soon, with more analysis.

G-d bless the will to learn from history, otherwise we will repeat it.

We in the West have been doing quite ok lately, especially mr. Barack Obamas presidency was succesful in terms of international prestige and philosophical progress. The ideas of Change, that is a Socialdemocratic ideology has actually had a revival.

Especially the liberal or Democratic philosophical cause has actually been bettered.

It seems to me, that the current administration actually wants to follow in our footsteps, so that is ok.

We defined two major enemies; Islamic State and China. Why?

First of all, China is an enemy, because it has continuously siphoned knowledge, ideas and production capability from the West. This without being on the side of the West strategically.

Continue this, and we would be the laughing stock and push over in some years.

I would just go fast and blitzkrieg, terminate their production capability while we still hold the upper hand militarily, and then that would end the stand off.

But, there are a lot of worry and I understand that. The war will come sooner or later, sooner is better, because it gives us the best possible strategic advantage.

With Russia, we do not have any quarrel, and we cannot afford a two front war, so we should remain friends.

Then the next enemy, Islamic State.

There is a lot of strategy and planning that goes into fighting that enemy. Not at least strategy, that takes Western Europe into consideration.

First of all, focusing on an enemy, that is only a part of the muslim world, gives the muslim world a way out. Fight all muslims would effectively force all muslims to fight us, and they do not wish to fight us, so why should we then fight them?

Secondly, the special thing about Islamic State is the fact, that they are a POLITICAL enemy. They fight our Democracy, and they fight for a POLITICAL version on Islam, that of the Caliphate and the Sharia law. Two entities that do not mix with our Democracy and rule of law by the people.

So we do not attack the muslim religion, but only the political part of islam.

Thirdly, these are the ones who are attacking us, so it makes sense to fight back.

Fourthly, there is a very difficult discussion in Europe concerning racism and islamophobia. If we are clear on our attacks that only focus the political part of islam, well, then we avoid these accusations.

It is not about racism, or hatespeech or any such thing, it is an honest fight against an enemy who wants to destroy our Democracy, and uses inhuman methods like terror and raping.

So essentially we do not wish to target any minorities or anything like that, only the political strand of Islam that makes terror and do inhuman things.

Fifthly, there is a plan for the handling of islamists and islamist networks in Europe. That is to repatriate all these enemies, either to their own homecountry, or to an island somewhere safe.

This will ensure, that we do not fight inhumanely, and we tackle this poisonous enemy.

Its real, the terror attacks are real, the networks are real.

In essence, we have created a fine, honest and serious plan for Europe. We have even had green light from the Human rights council for this plan to be put in action.

I hope this will be used to a good effect, it is better to fight an inhuman enemy, than to cower in the dark.

G-d bless the will to confront our enemies with valor, and win.

The attacks in Syria is not good, why? Because it does not make much sense strategically.

To fight in the Middle East, one needs to understand the extremely complicated powerstruggles there.

How do you understand these powerstruggles? You do it by understanding the web of history in the Middle East.

Just take Egypt. Egypt is the oldest known state in the world. It started before anything else.

The same goes for Irak. Irak is the descendant of Babylon, who can trace its story all the way back to the first city of Eden.

Iran is Persia, who used to be Zoroastrians, who used to be Hittities.

We the Jews are a part of that web for good or worse ever since Abraham.

So, in order to make a strategy that makes sense for the Middle Easterns, you need to understand who your true enemies are, and your friends.

There are essentially two factions right now, that fights for hegemony in the Middle East. One is the shia muslims, the other is the sunni muslims.

Sunni muslims being arabs, and shia being Persian. Two very distinct peoples, who have been fighting each other for millennia.

It is a bit like the Roman Catholic and the Byzantine Orthodox.

When Barack and I called the shots, we first fought the shia for some time, but as the shia realized, that we were a serious international player, and we wanted peace. They settled for a peace deal.

Concerning the sunni, there is a very important internal division within the sunni community.

There is the pro western and the pro islamist, or anti western.

What Barack and I did was to make an alliance with the pro western forces, and fight the anti western alliance. That is muslim brotherhood, Islamic State, Turkey, Quatar.

It had the effect, that for once in a thousand years there actually was a player in the Middle East, who could reach both sunni and shia, and make peace.

We did make peace, a peace that is now unraveling.

Thing is, if we do not fight our enemies, but use our limited resources on attacks that make no real sense strategically, then we are out of the game, and we will be prey to our enemies.

The enemies being the muslim brotherhood and China.

Its real, France has been attacked, Germany attacked, the UK has a HUGE problem with the muslim brotherhood, the mayor of London being one of them.

After Barack stopped, Clinton revived the Cold War mechanics, because she was angry for having lost the election. This was, to me, wrong.

All the carefully planned and executed strategies that was in place after mr. Obama, was destroyed, and this brings us here, at the brink of another stupid Cold War.

I mean, we had just put that in the grave, now we have to start all over.

Luckily the Russian feels and understands, that the Obama fraction of the Liberal party has NOT supported this idiocy, and there is still an open window for cooperation and peaceful acceptance.

Focus our enemies, like the ones who really fight us, and we will win. Not focusing on the enemies, will bring us fatal problems, and a huge loss of prestige.

G-d bless the will to see clearly.

Ok, so the international human rights council in Strassbourg has had a bit of a beating by Denmark.

We have just finished a major discussion on the content and direction of the court.

To be honest, the direction it goes right now, is something I came up with, so off cause I am pretty satisfied.

At the same time I thank the judges for their open-mindedness and cooperation. Thank you you honors, it is a pleasure to work with you.

Why did I propose a rethinking of the human rights council?

Because the time we are in now is different from when the original document was written. Under the French Revolution, the writers were young idealists who had a world to win, and they did.

But now, it is almost 240 years after, and the idealism is not enough anymore. What was before seen as a renewal and something beautiful is today seen as something common.

We take human rights for granted.

Today the problem is essentially lack of support for the beautiful ideas of the French Revolution.

The ideas have been corroded and corrupted, and people are starting to abuse the freedom of the state to gain for themselves. The freedom has become a burden.

This is where the philosopher is supposed to guard democracy, and protect it against the dangers of complete collapse.

The greatest danger to our liberal democracies these days, is the complete disregard for the peoples of Europe. They are seen as pieces on a chessboard, and the psychological entity of the Nationhood in Europe and the West in general, is not respected.

A nation is a people.

To regain some sense of peoplehood, those who are living on the territories of the former sovereign nations of Europe, needs to see, that the essential rules of the democratic system is respected by the newcomers, otherwise they will also lose the faith in the states.

That is why, the fight for a democratic idealism and support to the values of Democracy is paramount.

We need to turn the corruption and reinvigorate the faith in Democracy where it is lacking.

And people needs to see, that the states can and will protect them against the aliens who are not respecting those rules of Democracy.

That is why people are so angry at the court, because the courts are supposed to SUPPORT democracy not destroy it by supporting and protecting aliens who do not respect the rule of law.

To put this in perspective, there has never actually been a philosopher who succeeded in protecting a Democracy that was in its final throes of termination. Never once since Plato came up with the solution to the downfall of Democracy, never ever.

See? We are fighting with our backs against the wall, the populace is so angry with the system, that they prefer a tyranny. And then we will lose our Democratic systems.

So, what I propose as a tool and as a purpose of the new human rights council, is a realistic, honest approach to the cliff of disaster we are veering above, and then do everything in the councils power to PROTECT the nations and peoples who are in harms way.

Because otherwise we will have failed that sacred mission that was given to us, by the buoyant revolutionaries 240 years ago. To be the guardian of Democracy.

G-d bless the will to be honest and sincere about the problems that are in the current democratic societies.

There is a lot of discussion concerning Social media and the theft of data.

Honestly, I like social media, I grew up with a Commodore 64, and I really digged all the ideals of open source and computernetworks, realizing an open world.

This is about peace, the more we talk with each other, the less we fight.

It goes all the way back to Niels Bohr, who is the founding father of the open source community.

Lately though the computer community has run into problems, due to problems with all the interests of the world. We have become the main media.

That was the goal right? So how do we then grow up and be mature about it.

Because all that power makes other people of power nervous. I understand, same with me, if I do not worry about the consequences of my actions, then people tend to die and things go awry.

That is why, I believe, that we should have a look at the basic ideals that we are fighting for. We are fighting for an open, democratic world. A world where dialogue and communication brings understanding between people. So that we stop demonizing people we do not know.

There are powergames, and we cannot do anything about that, only get them over with as fast as possible.

But the interconnectedness that we have created in the computer industry is there to make peace.

So, that is the aim.

We have to be honest, respect the sanctity of the individual and never ever censure any ideas or meanings people have. Because it is much better that people get a possibility to share their ideas or frustration rather than they go violent.

Freedom of speech is there as a ventilation of society.

G-d bless the will to be free and open.

I have thought a lot about the current crisis within academia. To my mind, it is essentially a problem of too much diversification.

According to Plato, the aim of knowledge is to unify. To him academia (that is the garden where Plato taught originally) is to unify knowledge. Hence the term Universtity.

To him, heaven is a place where we are all unified, and consequently the same must be the aim of learning here on earth. In Epinomis the Platonic dialogue, this is his point.

He discusses geometry and mathematics, as he claims that these are some of the core scientific subjects.

I agree with Plato, instead of burying ourselves into our own subject, we need the cross breeders to have more space.

How do we do that? Well to be absolutely honest, I believe we should stop all scientific discussion right now, and then all read Plato.

Go back to that original academic point of departure, and then accord our ideas into the ideas of Plato.

Let him be the guiding star of a new academic development.

G-d bless the will to be academic again.

There has been a lot of discussion on the topic of my philosophy. Right now it actually hits home the deepest in the Eastern European countries, where the Christian-democratic society is really thriving.

Well, one could say, as some have, that it is racist and this and that. But essentially it is not that, it is simply the design made by Aristotle. According to him a Democracy is pinned on a base of well functioning families.

So it is more a combination of religion and democratic theories that has made the theory that I have made.

But at the end of the day, these are not new ideas, these are ideas faithfully delivered to the Eastern European countries directly from Aristotle. Honestly, that is the most sacred and high quality source you can get, only rivaled by Plato.

The beautiful thing about it is furthermore, that is works.

As a philosopher, you have ideas and thoughts, but usually you do not see in your lifetime whether your ideas work. But to my great appreciation my ideas really work.

So instead of the European Union going amok with the Eastern European countries, then learn, Change, adapt to the new reality and ideas.

Fascism stems from ideas that do not work. What happens is, that the believers in the ideas that do not work start forcing these ideas on the populace. Creating censureship, illiberalism and so on. Good ideas do not have to do this, because the people like these ideas.

That is the light of the nations, to give high quality ideas that suits the nations that needs them.

So Change, see the ideas that I give for the quality they have.

Don’t fight so much to keep the power, invest your lives and political careers into something that people really appreciate.

Central European politics suffers from too poor quality to my mind. At least, when I was in Belgium ten years ago with SIAD, that was my feeling.

Low quality ideas will give you low quality politics, and people will be unsatisfied. High quality will make people happy.

This is not to be condescending. I did not do this to antagonize anyone, but the spread the light to the nations. As all Jews should.

G-d bless the will to do good.

Welcome Mrs. May to Denmark. You have all the love and appreciation from the Danish people towards England.

I know, that you have had a rough two years after the election, and seem very friendless these days, but count on Denmark.

I wanted Denmark to follow Great Britain out of the EU, but it didn’t work. But as the leading intellectual of Denmark, this speaks to the support that you have from us.

I really hope, that you get through all your problems, and you can count on our support all the way.

G-d bless the fair isles of England.

We are heading for a fight in Europe against a certain part of the muslim migrants.

First of all, let me clear about muslims in general. They are people as we are. They have families, they look forward to times of festivities and so on. The dark non-forgiving attitude to muslims in general that has bloomed the last four or five years, is not of my making, and I truly think it is wrong. Muslims are people too.

The conflict we have with the muslim world is, as I see it, a conflict with our Democratic values and institutions.

Our belief in vesting the power with the people, and faith in our laws.

Islamists, as they are called, reject these values and this societal system and wish for a caliphate based on muslim law. AKA sharia.

You can be democratic and muslim at the same time, no problem. But you cannot wish for a muslim political system and then have a right to vote in a Democratic country.

This is real. The democratic rights have been taken away from most voters in Turkey, and had Mr. Al-Sisi not won the Arab spring in Egypt, things would have gone awry there too.

In Europe, we have the same problem with what we call islamists. Recently France had terrible occurrence of these issues, with a valiant police officer sacrificing himself for the sake of poor hostages.

So in Europe, these problems are abundant.

Essentially we have a war between Islamism and Democracy being waged in all of Europe, and only Denmark and France has awoken to this threat.

So, what do we do? We find out who the islamists are, their schools, their madrassas and mosques, and we close them down, and remigrate all who are members of said Islamist infrastructure.

Again this seems harsh, but remember the threat of nazism, and how it infiltrated and in the took over Democracy? It is very much same, Democracy must defend itself from political systems that wants to tear down the democratic order.

We have come pretty far in Denmark, but we need to go further to protect our laws and our Democracies.

We have seen it in the maws of the Islamic State, the rape the torture, the arrogance towards human rights.

This will not do, and we need to wake up in Europe, and fight the bastards.

G-d bless the will to see things as they are.

There are many who wish to change the way we live. Small time intellectuals, great thinkers, the bully down the ally and so on.

But true Change will only happen very rarely, and I believe, that it will only happen, if the people who do these things have wisdom.

Now wisdom is an archaic word, and perhaps it is too old in a sense. But nonetheless I belive, that that is what we have lost over the last century.

What is wisdom? According to Plato (Epinomis) wisdom is the knowledge of the good. But a knowledge that is based on the understanding of spirit.

It is a kind of triangulation. Wisdom prerequisites knowledge of good, knowledge of G-d and this synthesis gives you wisdom.

I can see it in many of my predecessors, Marx one of them, he did not have knowledge of G-d, and consequently, his theories were often bereft of true goodness. He did not have the drive towards good and humanity in his ideas.

He also did not heed the wisdom of Lycurgus, whom he owed his ideas of Sparta. According to Lycurgus, as spartan society should be absolutely closed to work. He theorized the opposite, and consequently Marxism does not work.

True wisdom today is therefor, to really understand what is up and down in theory, knowing where it comes from, and then choose what is good for people. Having the drive to see the little mans best.

That will give you true Change. It will often tear the social fabric apart, because more often than not, the fabric is based on some unwise ideas. As in some of Marxses less good ideas. But the endresult will be good, if the theories are truly wise.

G-d bless the will to be humble in the face of power.

There is a lot of problems for Russia these days. Russia is accused for all kinds of things, half of them not right. The rest just things that can actually be proved or argued for in a sane manner.

But Russia have become the International scapegoat, because the West is too afraid to point at the real threats. It is bit like in the Byzantine time just before the fall of Constantinople. Even though the Turks were camped right before the gates, the intellectuals kept discussing angels.

It is the same today, the islamists are roaming in most of Europe, and because we are too weak to discuss these problems, we pick on the weaker target. We Jews know aaaall about that.

What do you do in order to use this process constructively. Essentially Russia has nothing to gain in targeting the West. There are no ideological motives, and nothing it could really gain.

I doubt the West will attack Russia directly, because that would not sit well with anyone, and Mr. Trump knows his true enemies anyway, so he will not support it.

But criticism can be used to a good cause, if you see it for what it is. Easy life tends to create abuse and loitering, hard life tends to create progress.

As Michael Psellus say, “Good is scarce”. In other words, the progress that Russia already has had in terms of Christian development can be solidified and developed perhaps along the lines of Michael Psellus an illustrious Byzantine neoplatonic philosopher.

In other words, ethics, virtue and being good is what gives Russia a true renaissance. Thinking about what and how Russian can be good to each other in family life, in communal life, in everywhere where Russians share something, spirit will and can guide them.

G-d bless Mother Russia.

When I started my “career” or whatever you call it as a philosopher, I did it, as all philosophers should in a rebellion against the current order.

My mom and dad were flower power children, and honestly, there were a lot to change.

The cultural marxist ideas that my parents wanted and believed in, were the anathema to my ideas. Where they wanted barren state-control, I wanted national sovereignty. Where they wanted the state to be my family, I wanted my own family.

Do not get me wrong, It is not all of socialism that is wrong, but a lot of the central ideas are.

As time changed, I all of a sudden found myself at the top of the pyramid. I called the shots, and the rebellion that I wanted too soon changed into an elite progress. OK, I loved every second of it, and the Change that Barack and I brought was cherished by most intellectuals and people around the world.

But one place was all not really into my ideas, the European Union. In fact they clung to the first phase of my development, and kept seeing me as a rebel rouser and a threat to the current social order. Well, honestly I were. But I believe that a lot of the European countries around Denmark really failed to see my development.

Anyway, the content of my ideas have always been the same. It is a mid leaning conservatism. I have nothing against animal rights, the care of the nature. I believe feminism has its role to play, and so on.

In Europe however, the first phase of my rebellion kept fighting its way through the fog of war, and has created new beasts as AfD, Front national, Lega Nord and so on. Centre leaning conservatisms with a new angle on politics.

I know that many of these parties are feared in the parliaments around Europe, but if you look at the content of their politics, it is not extreme in any way. The difference is often, that they actually mean what they say, and are not afraid of talking the talk, and walking the walk.

But, with myself, I see that my ideas are actually accepted by most, and I hope, that the CONTENT of these ideas are recognized. They are the best we have; human rights, democracy, the rule of law, respect for the individual.

This is why I see, that the path I have put out, WILL change Europe. It may come from above or below, but it will come.

As a parent with both a stick and a carrot, I will Change Europe.

So please, stop the misery, and have a look at the CONTENT of the ideas I have presented. There are new enemies, like the islamists, and new friends, like Israel. But seriously, what would you want the most, being friends with the most illustrious nation of the world or friends with child rapists. The logical choice is pretty obvious.

So, please have a look at what I am actually saying, and judge me on that.

G-d bless the wisdom of the ancients, realized once again in our time.

In Europe, and with the European Union, there seems to be an essential why that has never been asked, and why is that?

That is because we have gone from a dark intellectual period of post this and post that. Communism stopped functioning, liberalism seemed to be at its last leg, conservatism was over. Everything that made any sense politically was over.

So it is absolutely impossible to build anything of real value or virtue on intellectual ideas that are empty.

But now, things have gone 180 degrees around, and we are living in a renaissance. Democracy is fought for again, liberalism is vivid, our religion is actually clawing its way out of the misery it was in, and even socialism finds new paths.

That is the difference. We are actually living in the Danish Renaissance.

I have done extensive research on the other renaissances that were before this one. Actually I have realized, to my great joy, that there was a Byzantine renaissance in the year 1000 that I did not know anything about. That is really the missing link between the Italian renaissance of Leonardo da Vinci and Machiavelli and the Roman Empire.

After that we had the French Renaissance and now the Danish renaissance.

Essentially it is a rebirth of Plato and the ideas around the city of Athens.

Compared to the other renaissance philosophers, my advantage is, that I have much more easy acces to hidden scripture due to the internet, so this makes this renaissance different than the others. It is a bit deeper.

Hopefully we will acces a time of great evolution in Europe and our children, that will, eventually drive our rebirth as a continent.

G-d bless the will of the ancients.

I have been trying to give the European Union some more thought. It has come to my realisation, that the European Union has some of the same problems as the Eastern Roman empire, the Byzantine realm.

Excessive Bureaucracy, opaque powerhandling and a much too liberal view of the world.

The neoplatonist writer Michael Psellus writes and analyses the faults of the Byzantine empire, and we can use his ideas and reflections in the understanding of today.

Essentially Michael Psellus points to the fact, that Zoe, the empress and nemesis of the Byzantine empire was too liberal.

It reflects the idea of Plato, that the backside of Democratic coin is too much liberalism. When things get so free, that everything gets annoying, even the animals gets annoying.

In other words, the balance between law and freedom, responsibility and freedom order and freedom tilts too much in the favour of freedom, and this brings ruin.

The remedy of cause will be to bring in order in the right places.

One place I would start, would be to reform the administration as such, cut down on all the liberal practises of money squandering. Reel in the costs, make a simple but realistic budget. Stop all the corruption there.

Secondly, and this is where i believe that Michael Psellus really has some wisdom to share. He says, that the philosopher say, that superficiality and vainness is abhorred by the philosophers, what philosophers respect is when one think about the needs of the nature of things. It goes like this.

“Philosophers will tell you that the vain and superfluous are of all things on earth the most despicable. For them the object of life is to understand those things that are necessary to their nature. All else is regarded as merely so many external attributes.”

― from “Fourteen Byzantine Rulers: The Chronographia of Michael Psellus (Classics)”

In other words, what we need is Eudaimonia, or rather good spirit. The central idea of the Aristotelian work the Nichomacean Ethics.

What is Eudaimonia? It is the right values to support the nature of each nation in Europe.

In other words, we need to figure out the nature of each nation, and then the values that that nature requires.

In the US it is pretty obvious, it is essentially a protestant democratic country, and therefor the virtues of that country are the virtues of democracy and protestantism.

But with the rest of Europe, it is not so clean cut.

But instead of integration that the EU has used as its guiding motor, it should use Eudaimonia as its guiding idea. Trying to figure out, how it can support the virtues of each country that is in its system.

Then the process of destruction can be reversed, and each country can be happy in itself.

The first step should be pretty obvious for the EU, you have to figure out a way to remigrate all the migrants that have no business in Europe, in a nice and humane way off course, but it needs to be done, because the security of the European countries is not working.

Then you need to accept borders. Because that works as a detriment to the migrants.

Europe is not about borders or control, it is about a continent that needs to bloom and be happy. Eudaominia.

Go for that goal, and you will survive.

G-d bless the humility of a civil servant.

When looking at Germany, I see a great promise, and the danger of complete ruin.

If Germany is succesful in regaining control of public opinion. Or rather is in harmony with what the people wants, it may thrive and grow, if not, and that is a very obvious danger, the state will fall, and a revolution will ensure.

Am I right? Have a look at the rest of the West. The US as one of the examples. Putting Trump up as president is a good thing in the sense, that it stops the people from outright revolt.

It seems to me, that the European leaders somehow have forgotten what it is to rule, and the dangers of it.

If you do not listen to the peoples, they will rebel, and that is a very, very dangerous thing the for the elite.

Take the Breivik case. Yes it was a horrible act, but it was an act of public rebellion. It happened, because the people of Norway is against the current mood of the elite.

As simple as that.

Now, let us take an example, that at least the Eastern Europeans might know. The fall of Michael the usurper in the 1000 century in the Eastern Roman Empire.

How did that come to pass? It happened, because the PEOPLE were so reviled by the deeds of the usurper. He did things, that they simply would not accept. Such as sending the true heir, Zoe in exile and cutting her hair off.

It might sound strange today, but the rage of the people is VERY strong thing.

Now in the last forty years, the elite of Europe have had great ideas, and consequently tried to enforce them. Mainly the idea of integrating the European nations into on nation.

This was done with stealth, and done without the consent of the peoples.

For a long time it went quite well, mainly because the peoples, did not know what was going on. It let the european elites into a belief, that the peoples of Europe were accepting the plans, and they were so busy with all their plans, that they forgot the peoples wishes.

Now, as it happens, eventually the peoples realized what was going on, and they abhor the very idea of loosing their beloved nations, especially because the unwise decisions of migrating vast hordes of unskilled and uneducated peoples of the third world into Europe somehow ALSO seemed like a good idea at the time.

Well, this has proven wrong, and we are now living in the hangover of the great experiment of Delors.

We, the children, are left to try and salvage some kind of future in the grasp of radical islam, a mass loss of production capability, new enemies in and around us, mass rapes and so on and so forth. Thank you very much Jaques Delors.

Anyway, there is hope, but it is very slim.

The hope is, that the elite will finally wake up the the needs of the people, and start listening to what their needs are.

If not, they will rebel, that is always what happens, when an elite is too far away in their own world, and think that peoples can just eat cakes if they have no bread. Or just put up security windows, when the entire country is having a mass theft of goods due to the open borders.

You cannot despise the needs of the people for very long and live as a political entity. Look at history, and that will tell you so.

The example of Michael and Zoe is one, the example of the Russian and the French Revolution is another.

Now, mr. Barack Obama is his wisdom saw this, and he took me under his wings.

To be honest, I started out as a revolutionary philosopher. The heirs to the first phase of my development is still here, led by mr. Steve Bannon.

Anyway, getting a little older and perhaps wiser, I have started to support the elite. I believe, that if the elite is persuaded to listen to the people, we can avert a revolution.

Maybe I am wrong, maybe I am right.

But IF we can make the elite see, that the massmigration and open border policy is at the direct detriment of the peoples of Europe, we can perhaps work together.

The first step is to reinstate the power of the Nations, and get rid of the corrupt EU bureaucracy. Not totally, there are things that the Eurocrats can work on, like regulating the fisheries and so on.

But the true power must rest with the people.

There is a storm brewing in the horizon, not to see it, is folly. The European elite has a choice to side with the people and fight the islamists of Erdogan and the Muslim Brothers, or go against them.

In Denmark we are siding with the people, we have just made major reform fighting said enemy. It makes the people rest.

So, instead of fighting the people, side with them in their sincere need of protection and safety.

The chaos that the EU has brought us so far, is not the path. The path is peaceful cooperation between sovereign nations.

Erdogan is quite open about his intentions with Greece. It is in high time, that we side with Greece in their calamity, and start raising our own armies to counter the islamists, and IS that has again reared its ugly head in France.

This is not a religious fight it is a fight for our freedom, against an intolerable enemy, who likes to rape women. That is the base of their moral conduct, and by the honor of our own daughters, we will fight.

G-d bless the will to find peace amongst us all.

It is with the highest honour, that M. Arnaud Beltrame has sacrificed his life, in the line of duty.

Seldom do we see such bravery and selfsacrifise. Going in, and taking the place of a hostage is indeed a very courageous thing. It is a true wonder, that such personnel exists today

It is through the courage of such a man, that France will survive. It is through the example of such a man, that France will be judged by the compatriots around in Europe.

The battle against IS is not over, in fact it has just begun in Europe, and we will not budge!!!

G-b bless the memory of Arnaud Beltrame.

Germany is finally waking up to the same reality as the rest of Europe. Migrant rapes, infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood, extremist terror attacks and so on.

We have been discussing these things in the other countries for quite a long time now. But Germany is just starting.

Let me say this as a beginning. Germany has thick walls, but not that thick.

The thickness of the walls are not endless, and now the walls are crumbling. Even the great Teutons are now in war with some pretty nasty powers of the Middle East, and need to start playing the game of international politics, in order to survive as a whole culture.

At the depth of the problems lies a trauma, that has haunted Germany since the end second world war. The trauma of nazism.

I have a lot of experience with nazism, not least as a jew, it goes with the territory.

At the other hand, I like Germany. I have been in Germany many times with my dancing group. In Braunsweich, in Coburg and Hamburg.

I have also travelled through Germany many times, in my young years when I used to hitchhike, I hiked a lot through Germany, and I have always come to like the order, the friendliness, and the festive mood of the Germans.

Compared to Denmark, Germany has a deeper connection to the Roman Empire. For a long time Germany was the Holy Roman Empire. This gives Germany a mindset of a larger nation, with a much more hierachichal bend.

In a sense, Germany is, as England a mix of viking freedom mentality and Roman discipline.

Hitler sought to formulate this culture into Social nationalism. That is, he took some things from socialism, and some things from nationalism and made a new mix.

There was just one problem, Hitler didn’t have the slightest idea about what he was doing. He didn’t know what the traditions of the vikings were, the romans were and so on.

So he made a hodgpot of a theory, that had absolutely no walk on earth.

The holy fürher ideas harks back to Egypt and their belief in a god form of a leader, the pharaoh. Nationalism was a strange mix of northern mythology and occultism. Socialism was a state driven community.

Just a lot things put together.

So, let us try to get the things straight.

Vikings were lovers of freedom, and warriors. The g-ds of old were mainly fighters, Odin the main g-d the war for wisdom and war. Thor the g-d for strength and war. Tyr the g-d for community and war.

They communed at tinge once a year and elected their kings. That is the northern root of democracy right there.

Freedom is the true value of the vikings.

At the other hand, Roman culture was, essentially sparked by the Etruscans. A strange people of Tuscany, who believed, that there was a plan in the heavens, which was essentially a plan of the earth. The important thing was to copy that heavenly plan on earth. You can still see some of the perfectly round cities in Tuscany, and you still have the ideas of the Romans in the military. The military being a Roman cultural remnant.

So, instead of going haywire with nazism, which was a hoax. My idea is, that in order for Germany to be Germany again, you need to understand your own roots.

I like Paracelsus, one of those ancient heroes of Germany. His simplicity, his quest for new ideas, his strength in conviction.

Use him as a prism for your own rebirth.

But go back to the real ideas of your forefathers, instead of all the phony ideas that Hitler had. He destroyed you, because he was a false prophet.

You need to accept that, and find yourself again.

G-d bless the will of the German people to be themselves again.

I must applaud the wonderful demonstration of French intellectuals from both left and right, written in le Figaro a week ago.

France is fighting its way OUT of political correctness, and is set to make a new stamp on intellectualism.

No, democratic criticism of migration and islam is not the same as racism and islamophobia.

It is criticism.

It is a testament to the quality and the breath of political thought that ALL intellectuals now wish to be set free from these chains of thought.

How can Democracy live, if there are taboos in the media? How can we be free, if we are not allowed to talk about certain things.

Off cause, we are allowed to talk about EVERYTHING!!

This is the case with the Vilks committee and Charlie Hebdo.

Just because you are a member of a certain religion, you are NOT exempt for criticism.

The blood of the martyrs are flowing the gutter.

But it is by the example of these martyrs, that the Republic will live.

To honor the heroes of Charlie Hebdo, I believe, that we should not just put up wreaths of honor, but do as they do.

Criticise, poke, enlighten.

Because, Democracy dies in Darkness, and let it be, that all the lights, that still has fire in them, light us up.

Go France!!!!!

G-d bless the will to be an enlightener.

Feminism must adhere to the trends of the time to be of real value. As when we saw in the maws of the Meetoo wave, and now as we see it in the terrible destruction that the migrants have brought to the sanctity of the female liberty.

Yes I know, that Hollywood is a liberal stronghold, yes I know that migrants have traditionally been protected by Liberals.

But, as I see it, womens right to be protected against threats to their body is MORE important than what allegiance and allies we have.

Just because you are liberal, it doesn’t give you the right to abuse women.

There is a new trend Germany, where young women stand up for their right to be free and have freedom accorded to them in public spaces.

It is a reaction to, among other things, the terrible incident in Cologne, where massive throngs of migrant men abused women. They even have an arab name for it, it is disgusting.

I believe, that morale stands above allies, and I really wholeheartedly wish for your support to this new movement of Germany.

Here is their internetpage: http://www.120db.info/en/

Women have the right of their own body, they are not supposed to be abused in any way, by anybody.

G-d bless the will to do something about this growing abuse of women.

I am reading a book about the Byzantine empire, or the East Romans. A certain Michael Persellus, a philosopher of the 1000 century.

He writes about the emperors of that time in a reflection of the great Plutarchs writing about classical heroes.

There is a lot of wisdom in that book.

One of the wise points in the book, that really made me understand what is going on in Europe right now, was a story about an emperor that was very weak.

He succeeded a strong leader, who had fortified the realm, and made it very rich.

So the weak and the strong leader were very much in contrast.

So the weak leader came down hard on his own people, savaging them, burning out their eyes. While as he was pampering the enemy. Giving the enemy money, bribing them, and so on.

The strong leader was simple, principled, and lead from the front.

He never used any money, but simply hoarded all the money in his vaults.

His people were happy and content, and though he was prone to rage, he was not unfair.

He was very much into all the details of statemancraft, and knew his army to the smallest detail.

So, where are we in Europe right now?

Are we weak, or are we strong?

The answer is pretty straight forward, we are weak. We pick on the wrong enemies, harass our own citizens and pamper our enemies, trying to bribe them.

A good example is the endless abuse of little girls in Rotherham. Why do we do it? Because we are weak, we do not have the courage to confront the enemy.

These pakistanis and other do it to our little girls, to scare us into submission. Because we are weak, we let them.

It will crave a will of iron, to turn the ship around, and become strong again.

But that is what we need to do, not at least to protect those little girls.

G-d bless the strength we can find, if we are honest about these things.

When I was in Chile some years back. I chanced upon the naval museum, where certain stories were told. One story I particularly liked, was about a certain English lord, whom had, in his holiday chanced upon Chile.

As the distinguished lord fell upon the friendly country, he enrolled in a naval battle on the side of the Chileans.

He had the traditional upperclass elegance usually seen with English aristocracy.

They exhibited a letter, where he ordered the Chileans troops around, and he told them to place themselves “Estrategically”.

Beautiful isn’t it? I can just see the old warbird sitting there on his Chilean warship, with his pen and quill, and writing his orders to the gaping and idolatrous Chileans.

Now, let us use that old warbirds wisdom again here in Europe. Because what if we take a step back, and look at the situation of Europe, “Estrategically”.

Well, if we look at our enemies, we must admit, that they have us by the throat.

We are war weary, and we do not have the weapons to combat said enemy.

Our weapons are made for mass scale war, while our enemies, that is mainly the Muslim Brotherhood and their cronies are waging a war against us, using our own weaknesses against us. Honestly using a wave of poor migrants as a weapon, that was genius.

We still reel from the backlash.

So instead of using tanks and aero planes, they use knives, trucks and suicide bombs.

You have to respect a enemy that has no ressources but knives, winning over an enemy that has supersonic jets. Estrategically, we have been beaten with simple means and cunning.

THAT is why, I am proposing a shift of strategy. Instead of keep using the second world war machinery, we need to develop new means of arms.

That is fast moving, flexible forces, that can come to the rescue at a short moment of notice.

Drones, special troops, AI and so on.

Warfare is changing due to new enemies.

At the same time, we need to stop looking at the old media for our only inspiration. There are plenty of new media around, and that will save us. My blog one of them, but there are plenty of others.

We have to zoom out, go back in time, have a sit in that captains chair, in the map room of the battle cruiser, rigged with sails and made of oak. And have cool look at the threats.

The main threat is turkey, Quatar and the migrant waves that are, some of them, artificial.

We have to beat back the barbarians, I believe the old lord would have said. And, to be fair, he would be right.

G-d bless the will of the wise, and let us not forget our humanity. Because war is always terrible. Especially the crude wars.

Now, as far as european rearmament goes, we need to look at a new concept.

But in order to do that, we need to look at where we have come from, and who are true enemies are.

Where do we come from?

We basically come from a second world war armament system, that Germany developed together with France and Great Britain.

It consists of armored vehicles, that can be massed and used in different ways.

The Germans were pretty good at this system, making use of the “blitz krieg” strategy, that is heavy, fast-moving tanks overrunning vast areas.

Then we have to look at the true enemies. Yes, I know that there is plenty of buzz about the Russians, but, we cannot use media spin as the basis of our rearmament. This is too important to do without looking carefully at the landscape of enemies.

The most pressing enemy is the amalgament of islamists in Europe. Yes, I know, then you will start yelling racist and islamophobe and so on, and so forth.

But, none the less, this is the reality.

It is mainly concentrated around the Muslim Brotherhood, an Egyptian organisation that is entrenched in most of Europe, and in Turkey as the main state sponsor, plus Quatar.

This enemy is very clever, and uses our own system against us. So far the strategy has been to overflow Europe with poor migrants, using them as attackers and to suck up our ressources.

They have to be dealt with first. No, this is not racist, my own father was a nice and liberal muslim, and I have supported Iran when they sued for peace, and I am the only one power who still support this.

I have nothing against Islam in general, but do abhor the undemocratic claim of the islamists.

Secondly a new enemy is rising on the horizon. That is China. Already the US is on it, and is trying to build a forceful alliance against the Chinese. But we have to be sharp on this enemy as well, not at least to help the Americans. They will eventually come to our help, when time comes, so we need to repay that friendship, as I see it.

So, en essence, where do that lead us to?

It leads us to two main areas that we need to invest in. 1. AI. 2. Combat drones. Why?

Because the Chinese are specialized in AI and communication warfare, we need to bridge that gap to be serious in warfare. Its called cyberwar, and we are already far behind, together with the Americans, we can close the gap. Believe me, the Americans will be openarmed for that investment.

Then because the warfare that we will see with the islamists in Europe will be a low-tech version from their side, that we need to meet with tools that is adequate.

Let me give you and example. In Israel, we have, for long time, have a lot of problems with the Gazans building tunnels from Gaza into Israel. It was low tech, but it allowed the Gazans to launch a lot of surprise attacks on Israeli ground, pretty clever.

How did I solve that problem? I did it by advising the Israeli military tech industry to invest in robots that would clean out the tunnels. So they did, and that worked. Today the robots are the scare of the tunnel builders. High tech solution to a low tech weapon. See?

The same goes with the infiltration of islamists in Europe, we need to invest in flying drones to help the gendarmerie attack and hold positions. The Americans have some pretty cool stuff, they can help. According to my knowledge, we here in Denmark are also pretty far in drone building and investment.

A high tech solution to a low tech warfare.

The two techs, the AI and the drones also work together, so there is a bonus.

How do we then go about rearming the European military? We do it, by preparing ourselves for the inevitable clash with the migrant areas. Instead of going in with only our valor, we go in armed with the best tech.

That will work.

There are a lot of added speculations to this strategy. One is the mixing of police forces with military. That makes for a new paradigm of defense as well. We need to integrate the two forces, but with respect for the traditional role of the gendarmerie, they are the ones in control. We need to respect their jurisdiction, otherwise we sacrifice the protection of the law of the citizens.

Its a bit complicated, but it can be done.

Make an army, to drive out the islamists, and other migrants, who do not respect our laws. At the same time, force the migrant countries to respect our wishes for a peaceful solution, and the takeback of their citizens.

There is one exception to the rule, that is Turkey, that has a very powerful conventional army. We need to be able to tackle that, especially if they attack Greece.

When all this is finished, we will have a battle experienced army, that can then be put into action in other places of the world. South Africa could be a candidate for that.

Then we still have to remember what we fight for; we fight for DEMOCRACY! And our FREEDOM!

G-d bless the will to plan ahead, and be honest about these things

I have thought a lot about the challenges of France. Seriously, as my sister organization Charlie Hebdo, good friends of the Vilks committee, has experienced. The challenge of the Islamists is severe.

What to do?

First of all, don’t be stupid with your ressources, men, armament and so on. Find your best, loyal, intelligent general, and put him in the front of the assault of the islamists.

Perhaps there is a de Gaul somewhere in the country, if there is, find him and put him in charge of the assault on the islamists.

He should use the people he has under him with political understanding, a feel for media, and with rapid engagement.

The tools are there, but a lot of red tape needs to be cut in order for the gendarmes to work.

Find your Napoleon, and put him in charge.

Next, as in the attack of Charlie Hebdo, what did that truly signify? It signified, among other things, the mark of your heroes.

As the Vilks committee, that was attacked three years ago here in Denmark, your newspaper Charlie Hebdo are the true representatives of your republican faith.

They do it, to all.

So, with heroes, what they need, is support. Give them all the state can offer as support; security, acces to media, anything they need really.

Because it is not by chance that Charlie Hebdo and the Vilks committee was attacked, it was because they want to kill the best of us.

Keeping the best of us alive, is what matters.

G-d bless the will to ORGANIZE!

Now I am doing something completely stupid, and totally unfair.

A month ago, the Russians tried to blame all world calamity on the Jews, some sort of half-baked story about Khazarians Jews, and so on.

Ok, there is always a bit of fire in a cloud of rumors, but seriously? All of Jews, including the conservative Jews who has stood by the Russians all the time?

So, in a sense the Russians do not deserve what I am doing now, but I will do it anyway, because paradoxically, the new Jews are not the Jews, but the Russians.

Since we the jews are contributing, serving, helping the world to a better path, I suppose someone else need to fill the role as scapegoat and take the blame for peoples own problems.

Let is be honest about all this antirussianism. It is not founded in anything serious. Yes, Mr. Putin saved Krim, but Krim WANTED to be a part of Russia. They are Russians, and there has been no rebellion in Krim. The only rebellion there has been, has been in the Ukraine areas, that ALSO want to be a part of Russia.

There may be some spying and killing, but apart from that, that is honestly going on all the time, Russia do not deserve the role they have ended up in.

Look at the actions on ground, it is not fair.

We Jews know what it is to be a scapegoat, and we have learned to fight it. Often with devastating results, both on the Jewish side as well as on the attacking side. Take Nazi Germany, or the evil Haman of Persia.

This is not something Russia is used to, so they do not know what to do.

Well, my advise is to be absolutely honest, and then start doing good things. Help here and there, share, show the world, that you are not the bad guys.

And for the rest of the world, there can be peace, if we see through our own prejudice, and start communicating instead of just pointing fingers. We can find peace.

There are not true interests in between Russia and the West, just psychological games that we play with our selves.

Why don’t we focus on the real problems instead of those who, at the moment, do not seem to be able to defend themselves.

And Russia, in this moment of danger, please remember who came to your rescue, the Jews did.

Because you were treated unfairly.

And off cause, Denmark.

G-d bless the will to see things as they are.

Mr. Trump, let me first, commend you for the things that you have done, and I should have done a long time ago. The crackdown on illegal migration, the rearmament of the troops and pushing the allies to take more responsibility.

This has come a long way down.

So, at the same time, let me continue supporting you in another area, because that is really something that I have done a lot of work with.

Foreign policy.

The greatest challenge you have here, is the fact, that the US is sandwiched in between two major threats, on the East the islamists, that is essentially the Muslim Brotherhood, and on the West China.

These two threats you need to tackle forcefully. But then that is where it gets difficult.

In the Obama era, what we did was actually focusing on the threat from the East, the islamists and preparing the offensive to the West. So in a sense we have not been trying to screw (sorry for the wording) the next president, but make a foundation to build upon.

This foundation is now pretty solid, all the economic factors are in the green, and the military is in pretty good shape. New weapons are under development and so you can actually fight due to the fact, that you have guns to do that with.

I know that we mothballed some of the big cruisers, but that was important to save up some ressources for the big finale.

So, there is one thing I need to recommend, that builds on some of the recommendations that I gave you previously.

That of being friends.

Mr. Bush was pretty good at that, he kind of supported the leadership with his Texas charm. He was really a good friend.

But he was also not a friend to his enemies. Them he fought pretty hard.

So that is perhaps an add on to the advice I gave you in the beginning of your presidentship. Be mean to your enemies, and a good friend to your friends.

Then the next obvious question is; who are your friends?

On the East, you know who your friends are, but I think you have perhaps overlooked the source of the animosity that we have there; The Muslim Brotherhood.

These are really the ideologues behind a lot of the problems we have in the West right now. They are the source of Wahhabism, Erdogan, IS, almost the overthrow of Egypt. That is a sunnimuslim organization from Egypt, that is the true enemy.

The shiites, are, for now, not fighting us, but are focusing on making a show of force in the Middle East.

Off cause this threatens another friend, Israel, so that is a complication.

So, if you look at it from that perspective, then Egypt is actually a key ally in the Middle East, because they are fighting The Muslim Brotherhood.

At the other side of the US, there are some pretty tough enemies. First when you targeted North Korea, it didn’t make much sense to me, but I can see, that in targeting the proxy of China, you challenge China. When China looses credibility, you get stronger.

But that does not make you unaware of the real problem.

Now, to my mind, it is good to challenge China economically. It has the added effect of signalling to the American businessmen, all businessmen, that China is not a place to produce anything.

But, it will end up in a warm conflict. I know you do not wish that, but war is just politics gone from one level of conflict to the other.

There are some good parallels in history, one is the fight between Rome and Phoenicia. Rome challenging Phoenicia for domination in the Mediterranean.

These wars tend to get pretty ugly. So the sooner you start the fight, the less will there be of slaughter. The more you linger, the fiercer the fighting will be.

But two world powers fighting for hegemony is a brutal thing.

If I were you, I would try to understand the mechanism of the Chinese war machine.

Let me give you an example that has been roaming my mind for a long time.

There is this amazing tv series about an alien race that attacks earth. What they do, is to infiltrate all our computers, and then, instead of fighting us, they simply turned all our military gear off. Like a switch.

Air fighters stopped in mid air, battle cruisers were switched off and so on.

But the heroes of the story, and old-fashioned battle star cruiser had, conservatively held on to “old-fashioned” concepts of no connection to the internet, keeping men steering the battle cruiser and so on.

So when all other tech was turned off, they still were operational.

See where I am going with this?

In essence, fighting China should include at least a backup plan of old-fashioned bomber-planes that can steer with maps and not use GPS.

The threat of a take over of all our tech by infiltration should be prevented.

We already had a bit of taste of it, when the Chinese hackers hacked our navy. That scared the s… out of our generals.

I hope that the countermeasures have been implanted, otherwise, I would let heads role in that account.

We NEED to be ready.

In Rome, there was an old statesman in the Senate, that used to end his talk with a; “what about the Phoenicians” for many years.

He, singlehandedly, forced the Romans to be ready. Now, that is my job, I suppose.

So, the war is coming, and you will better get ready. Otherwise, all our expensive ships and planes will just be switched off one day. And that will be the end of the US.

But, if you remain vigilant and ready for the fight, and then fight it with all your heart when it comes, you will win.

G-d bless the force of the US.

In the fight against IS, one particular ally of the league, the Kurds, have fought valiantly. This has not really been recognized by the league, and now they are in trouble, because IS is beat in the Middle East, and so we do not need them anymore.

On top of this, Turkey is going full retard, and feeling the urge to realize the ancient quest of the Ottomans, seriously?

Turkey is a NATO member, and is supposed to support the league of Democracy, not exactly the way is to go caliphatic.

Anyway, I think we owe it to the Kurds to help them, keep arming them, supporting their fight for a Kurdish homeland.

In fact, throwing such a valuable ally down the drain will not only weaken us in our regional respect, it will also make it much more difficult to make real allies in the future, we need to repay loyalty.

Turkey is another true problem. They are threatening Greece and they have a pretty strong army. So, we need to be a bit worried about that.

The Central European countries are rebuilding their forces, but we need them to fight internal insurgents, namely IS supporters in the countries.

So having a NATO member go rogue is not good.

But, as I see it, the Kurds are an important ally, not at least for Europe, especially if Turkey starts bombing Greece.

So we should support them, with all our hearts.

G-d bless the will to do right.

Finally, the German state is focusing on actually handing al the terrible causes after the onslaught of migrants in 2015. About time, I know I should have been more precise in coming up with solutions, but, we have to learn.

After going to the African countries, trying to make deals with them, asking nicely if they wanted to take their citizens back, we have realized, that they refuse to do so.

So, we need to have another approach, and that includes lethal force. If they are not willing to take them back if we ask nicely, we will have to make them take their migrants back.

That leads to the next logical step, we need someone of the state to be able to do just that. And that again means rearranging our security forces.

We need sharper, more able, more competent and trained people to make this happen, as of now.

In fact, we need an European ICE force, as in the US.

G-d bless the willingness to do something about this.

I am really sorry for all the drop outs of the blog. I have shifted host due to all the hacks I have experienced resently.

Hopefully this will solve all the hacking, the host is specialized in secure WordPress hosting, so I really hope it works.

The former host got a bit grumpy about it, and decided not to cooperate.

Sorry about that, but there should be a higher security now and also faster loadtimes, so I hope this will be experienced.

Thanks for hanging on!

Traditionally the right has been in alliance with Israel. To some different extents, except for the National-socialists, who are not really the right, but more the left in my opinion.

This has given the right a true source of inspiration, and in these days, the Israeli conservatives are truly inspiring all around the world. The Jews are contributing and supporting where they can.

The “alt-right” wave, that I basically started, is one of those products of Jewish imagination and thinking that really puts the world on another footing.

So, what we need, is to recognize this movement, and see it for what it is, a bit of light from the Jews.

So we are talking about being the “light upon nations”, well we are.

I hope that the right can actually see this, and stop harrasing us all the time.

We are not perfect, but we also have aspirations and goals to meet, lofty goals actually.

G-d bless Israel.

The first order of the day would be to commend those brave French forces, whom are now fighting the islamists.

Let us be honest about the challenge we meet in Europe right now. It is off cause a challenge of Democracy. Since the brave French are a harbinger of these true ideas, naturally France is at the forefront of the fight. As they were at the Arab spring, so now they are in France these days, where islamists are roaming about killing innocents. As Roland of ancient poems, French gendarmes and citizens are fighting back!

But let us also be a bit honest about the threat so far. It is not working with politics of symbols, what we need is a full scale investment in gear. We need to up the technical capabilities.

This means one single item, that has been the harbinger of destruction for the foes of Israel, drones or robots.

Let France get this new technology, maybe from the US, a close friend these days, and apply it to the defense of freedom.

Let the gendarmes sing again, on the top of their lungs, of patria, equality, liberty and the rule of law.

Let them, fearlessly, enter the frey, but let them do it armed with the latest of tech.

The courage is not discussable, but let us renew our dedication to the patria. Let us sing again, let us believe in freedom again, let that special French combination of beauty and force be the rule of the day again.

Let us celebrate our lives instead of our deaths, let the ancient heroes be relieved in our memories as the citizens brave the weather and fight for liberty.

G-d bless the life of France.

Europe needs to transform from a derelict and abusive entity, to be a servant of the peoples of Europe.

Otherwise, the entirety of Europe will disintegrate into absolute chaos.

Have a look at Bruxelles itself, and see for yourself.

Now that we have mr. Trump in the White house, things will not really progress that much. He is good in internal politics of the US. But foreign policy is not his strength.

Be as it may, therefor Europe needs to wake up of its slumber and start to fight for its independence again.

Look at it this way; we inherited the blessing of freedom from our forefathers, now this blessing has been taken from us again.

We need to take it back, by the strong hands of our men and women of Europe.

How do we do that?

First of all, we need to change our mindset. Instead of looking at the peoples of Europe as a burden that needs to be controlled, we need to change our understanding of ourselves. We need to see ourselves as servants of the people.

What is the overriding need of the peoples of Europe right now; it is security.

We need to give them that. How do we do that?

We do it by first; closing the borders internally as well as externally. The forces in the Mediterranean needs to bolster its defenses, and be given a free rein in turning those refugee boats around. At the same time, we need to put up some kind of protection around the migrants, so that they are not sold to the wolves, maybe give them a ticket home to their home country.

Secondly, we need to strengthen the internal security measures of the police in cooperation with the military. The two forces need to work in tandem. There is some ideas behind this, that I will return to.

Thirdly, we need to tackle the abuse of the social security systems in Europe by migrants. We need to terminate the clientelism of the migrants, and give them two choices, either find a job, or find a country that you can find a job in. Just staying on social wealth-fare is not a option in the long run.

Fourthly, we need to start repatriating criminal foreigners.

With this approach, we have a possibility to give the Europeans some measure of security.

When and if this works, then we can start rebuilding our societies and thereafter take back some of the power we used to hold. Not to colonize and so on, but to keep the peace.

Turn around the boat.

G-d bless the will to be sharp on the priorities of the peoples.

In Europe right now, we are finally waking up to the fact, that we are engaging in a proxy war with some pretty dead enemies.

It is like the zombies are reinventing themselves, and attacking the capitals of Europe.

Let me be honest with you, absolutely honest. The current crisis we have in Europe, is not about racism or white supremacy, it is about the Cold war infowar system that is still active within the European press and academia.

I know that this will probably put me on a few stakes in and around the Liberal media, but that is the way it is.

My father was a Muslim, a wonderful, liberal, intelligent person. He fought in the liberation of his country Bangladesh, in an attempt to make things right.

So this, for me, is not about right wing bigotry, I KNOW that you can be both black in skin and Muslim, and still be standup citizen.

But, and that is where things get hairy, there are some of the migrants who are not such gentlemen as my father. Look at Italy right now, it is overflowing with drugs and the crimerate is skyrocketing.

The media obviously take a moral high ground, they think, painting all the migrants as poor refugees fleeing from war.

Some of the are, my father was one of them, but most are not.

In the cold war, the Soviet Communists turned the media, culture and academia against the country they were living in. They tried to destroy the moral cohesion, the church and so on.

Still these systems linger in the media, but are now, slowly, falling out of fashion. My Credo; to bring Light to Democracy has become the new idea of a media ethos.

So that is good, but what we see when are really looking, is a Europe teetering on the abyss.

So what do we do?

I have worked on the problem for some time in Denmark, and I have already had some experience.

First of all, it is about changing the perspective of politics. We need to see it for what it is.

If people come to Denmark and start rampaging, violating the laws and go amok in an attempt to bring us down using sexual attacks.

Well, then they are enemies.

It is, in essence, not racist to say this. It is the truth.

In many countries, the elite do not dare to challenge the cold war dichotomy that resides in the media, culuture and academia, but are bowing their heads.

But that is over, there is no racism in looking at these problems rationally, that is what we are supposed to to; spread the light.

In Denmark we are very practical, so we have begun the repatriation of the criminals. We are still not very effective, but the political live is doing all that it can. Especially the Socialdemocrats are blazing the way.

We are also targetting the widespread abuse of the social system by migrants. All the money we use on pampering Somalis in Denmark, could be used to a much greater effect in Somalia.

BUT, and that is very, very important, we take our security needs serious. The reform of the security apparatus, that we have made, is aimed at strenghtening the police and the defense.

So now that we are actually taking serious, that we have a lot of IS warriors and IS like ideology flowering in the country, we have the necessary security apparatus to back up our dismantling of these enemies.

Again, it is not all the wellfunctioning foreigners who we are targetting, but the criminals, the islamists and those who abuse our social system.

This process is an important process to get right, so we survive. We are so far out in trouble, that surviving may just be a problem.

G-d bless the will to see these problems as they are, and act accordingly, even though this will be hard.

The world is stills turning, more or less around the spokes that I have developed over time. In Europe, the rise in center rightism is really gobbling up all the old middle leaning parties. Socialism is, more or less, a saga in Europe right now.

This process was aimed at tackling the downfall of the European Union. It is bound to happen, just take a look at the math.

What is important however, is that we have stable governments after the EU falls.

This reflects the Italian shift of power, the Lega is in my mold, and has made sweeping gains.

Hopefully, this will tackle the awful situation with uncontrolled migration. I hope so, really do.

In ten years time, there will no more Central European bureaucratic divide and conquer politics from Brussels, but a much more loose federation. Hopefully a federation, that will stand on its own two legs, or however many legs there may be.

We will see, but the fact of the matter is, that the Lega will have to deliver on fighting migrant crimes, and on remigration.

This leads to another real war, that will, hopefully not, but maybe, commence in between Italy and the countries that refuse to take back their migrants. This is an act of war. If you send millions of your citizens to colonize another country, then that is an act of war, if you do not want to take them back again.

Italy needs to see it in this way, and force the remigration of migrants from Nigeria and other such countries.

In the years ahead, hopefully other countries will help Italy in their attempt to force the migrants back.

That is the lay of the land.

At the other end of the world, the conflict with China will become hot at some point. This is better to do sooner rather than later.

Bomb out their industrial capabilities.

As of now, they are pretty much just geeks sitting behind computers looking at the world through the lense of a screen. That is pretty easy to beat, but as the Chinese military wing increases in power, the toll of defense investment will be higher, that is an easy equation to make.

So, get on with it, and in ten years time, we will be on the top of the world again. But it will cost us, and that is the price we pay for at neglect in defense expenses and laying our security in the hands of the US only.

The West needs to wake up and take responsibility for its own security needs, and it needs to do it sooner rather than later. The longer we linger, the more the cost will be in terms of life and money.

We come out of the shadow of the Cold War, beaten in terms of moral and faith in ourselves. But still, materially we are sound, so we better get to fighting not for material gain, but to truly survive.

In this process I hope we find our self esteem again, we need to be proud of ourselves again and stand up for our values.

G-d bless the will to be honest and forceful facing the dangers we face.