France is overrun by extremism; left-wing extremism, right-wing extremism and islamism.
In this difficult hour, it is time to relive what France is. Is it a weak and sick old man, or is it a beautiful country with traditions of the roman era, of the men of north, the spirit of Isis; Paris.
Now I truly believe, that it is time for the great warriors of France, the patriots, to rise and bear arms. Not to make a negative mark upon France, but to make a positive mark on France.
Fight for something beautiful, something that will make this wonderful place live for another thousand years.
I believe, that the patriots, should shed all the negative influence from Nazism, the Madam Blavatsky ideas, and start to look at the other side.
At the angel of Michael, the light bringer, to bring light to France again. To see it, to understand it to relive the valiant cry of Roland.
This is what France is, and what is at stake.
Good things, things of value, things that will have to be used to be alive.
But most important of all. I believe, that there is a great, great idea that must now be fought for, that we must rise up for. That idea of the Republic, that idea of Democracy, threatened by barbarism and islamism.
Only if the great sons and daughters rise to the occasion, and shout! At the top of their lungs for France, will we see her for another day.
G-d bless the beautiful France, and may we live to see her again. Par Isis, Paris.
In the current conflict between migrants and Europeans, we have two choices, or rather, I suppose we mostly have already chosen.
We can either chose to confront this conflict as an ethnic conflict or as a political conflict.
In Sweden the current environment, which is absolutely devastating, the conflict will, most probably, be ethnic. As in Yugoslavia, Swedes will band together with Swedes and other ethnic groups likewise.
There might be a religious superstructure to the migrants to chose from, that is an islamic identity and rule. But we will see.
The effect of this development will be like Yugoslavia, some areas will end up muslim, other areas will end up Serbian or the like.
If we, however, chose to see the conflict as a political conflict, that is a fight between democracy and islamism, the development will be qualitatively different.
The ethnic element will still be there, because democracy is a traditional value for most Europeans, but many migrants will be given a way to find loyalty to their new countries.
This also gives the current states an opportunity to survive. If the migrant crisis explodes into ethnic violence, the states will not survive, but new states will appear as a result of the turmoil.
The philosophical and ideological strength that follows in the footsteps of a revolution, that is a democratic revolution, within the frames of the current system, will make the tackling of the problems much more civilised, and thereby much less violent.
That is my plan, and has been all the time. That is why I have founded the democratic, republic wave that rides over Europe these days. Because it will be the wisest, and hopefully the least violent. But the air is pregnant with war, let us hope the war will be within some frames of civility, otherwise Europe will really end up in a bloodbath.
G-d bless the willingness to fight for a positive system.
These days there is a lot of problems politically in the US. The left is trying to undermine the right, and the right really hates the left. Not always, and sometimes it is right, and so on. But the country is split into two warring factions, that do not compromise or try to work together.
Politics will not work well under such conditions, what we need is to reach across the aisle, try to bury the hatchet and compromise.
As I see it, both camps have a lot of truth in their stance. On one hand, the liberal part is truly scared about the possibility of a constitutional meltdown. On the other hand the conservative part is truly worried about the possibility of a moral meltdown.
In fact both parties are right. They see the problems of the other part, and are right in their criticism. I however truly believe that the process of reconciliation is to try to be open to the criticism of the other part, and use that to reflect on our own faults.
We are all sinners, and it is only if we are humble about our own misgivings, that we can reach a compromise.
Yes, I do believe, that the southern borders should be fortified and migrants should use the official channels to enter the US. Yes, I do believe, that America should be strong again. Honestly, I have worked tirelessly on this for many years.
But I also believe in humanity and humbleness, in respect for spirit. In fact, I believe that without humbleness one cannot be strong, because humbleness will give you the ability to reflect on your sins.
Mr. Trump asked me to guide him, I believe I have stayed true to that. So in this spirit of understanding, we need to unite. Because as mr. Breibart said, E Pluribus Unum, in manifold are we united.
G-d bless the great Nation of United States of America.
I am hopefully going to the US, maybe on behest of the conservatives or the liberals, but there is one thing that I have really realized the last few days.
You need to start, or restart your tradition of philosophy in the US. I mean, I will be happy to be a surrogate for some time, but this will only work for some time, untill that I am no more or something unforseen happens.
The founding fathers were all philosophers, but it seems to me, that the tradition, more or less, stopped with them. Who are the philosophers of today, one may ask.
A country cannot do without a tradition of brilliant thinkers founded in the greek classical time. We have a function to play for democracy.
This is really the core of the problem, or why the US has felt lost, because the tradition has died out.
Perhaps we can rekindle this tradition? It is not easy, it takes a lot of altruistic work of many people to make a frame on which a philosopher of two can emerge. But it is possible.
In Denmark the tradition has been going on for a thousand years, more or less. So there are a lot of predecessors and illustrious minds to learn from.
But for a nation to make room for philosophers, a certain prestige should be given the calling.
It is a very elevated position, and a position that demands the utmost of the person who so desires to be a philosopher. It also demands an extreme ambition, and a solid education, preferably on an elite university.
In essence it is an aristocratic pursue, so it needs good strong families to both support good universities, and a yearning of learning in the intellectual aristocracy.
But it can be done, if the universitites and the old families are willing to.
Maybe even a renegade like me can get the honor, if he works hard enough.
G-d bless the willingness to be strong in intellectual pursuit.
I truly believe, that I am a good person. I might not be perfect, who are? But I have always tried to look at the world, and do what is good.
Doing good is somehting philosophers have discussed for millenia. Aristotle claims that good is a final epitomic virtue called happiness. Plato talks about the good, the beautiful and the true is the same.
I believe that both are right, but there is more to it. For me, I can say, that it is often something about a feeling that I get.
I remember when I was in Salvador fifteen years ago. I am a dancer, and we ended up there with my dancegroup.
Salvador is an evil city. When we walked the streets there, we were met by people who wanted to sell small children for sex. There was a lot of violence, darkness hiding in the corners.
In contrast to this, there was also cultural groups that were good, and a few writers. But the city of sin is not only Rio de Janerio it is as much Salvador da Bahia.
When I worked in IT I made a lot of money, but I ended up leaving the business, because there were so much darkness in the business. The companies cheated the customers. Whole schemes of how to make money on customers, without really giving them anything.
Now, I am in politics, and there is also a lot of corruption there. Too much it seems sometimes. In Denmark they continously try to shut me down, they call me all kinds of names, and believe that I am “controversial”. When it is controversial to confront the sins of your country, then we are truly in trouble.
But what is goodness really? Apart from the philosophical discussion, I also, deep in my heart, believe that goodness is a sense. You can feel it, if you are tuned to goodness, if your are tuned to spirit.
Helping a friend is good, being honest is good, trying to support your family is good, helping your country.
Bottom line, to be a good person will lead you to a better live, and may save religion. But it will also give you many enemies, especially those who are full of sin.
Well, I have wanted to go to Oxford again, and it is a bit of a challenge. I got sidestepped because the Americans showed interest, but still I want to go to Oxford.
I have given it a bit of thought. I know, that from the outside I am seen as a bit of a wild creature. I am out here fighting the wildlings waving my wand, sending off spell after spell.
But there is another side of me, that I have not had the opportunity to show the world. That is me as a truly civilised person.
I know that when fight in the wild, it seems all hair, swords and burning wands, but when I am at a school, I am another person.
My own school Vallekilde, that is the equivalent to Oxford in Denmark, was founded by my great-grandfather Ernst Trier. He was the leading intellectual at his time.
Then there has been many leading academics and artists in my family. Like the van Gogh family is the leading artist family in Holland, Trier is the same here in Denmark.
What I am trying to say is, you should definitely not worry that I will misbehave or start doing things at the school. On the contrary, I come there because I like to teach.
I really miss teaching, and besides from Vallekilde there are no other place I would rather like to teach than Oxford.
I feel like drawn to that place somehow, I cant explain it.
But here comes the agenda that I would like to propose, and hopefully we can make it happen.
G-d bless the will to do good, and save the Anglican church.
It is with a great shame, that I see, that the Turkish government are not able to discern between their own government and that of a foreign government.
If turkish citizens happen to be in the Netherlands or in Germany. Then they are not entitled to any part of the democratic waving of Turkey.
If they wish to be a part of Turkey, well, they are free to go and live there. Otherwise they are entitled to nothing and should follow the rules of the country that they are guests in.
Hereby I wholeheartedly support Holland, may you be strong in this difficult time.
So, in my attempt of helping the UK, the development of my little seminar has so far been, that the conservatives in the US are interested. Imagine that.
I have given a little thought to that, and honestly I think that that is a good thing. Ideas are free in the sense, that I do not own them, and anybody can use them as they want.
But to reiterate, my attempt to support the Democratic part of the American political life, I have made something for you as well.
It may not seem as much, but it is the best that I can do at the time. If you want, I would be happy to come over, and try to discuss some of the issues that has been at the center of my work with Mr. Obama. Thereby keeping his light alive.
For me it has always been very important to unite the country and not contribute to a fragmentation. So I sincerely believe, or rather it is my ardent hope, that my work will be a work of continuous reconciliation. Therefor I am really happy that the conservatives are open as well.
In practise, there is a problem about funding. Currently there is none, so to make a trip possible, a small amount of funding needs to be found somewhere. Just the plane ticket and perhaps a welcoming home somewhere, that is all that is needed.
The seminar is attached below, and you can see, that I have tried to touch on some of the main issues that has been up in the presidency of Mr. Obama. The angle could be changed depending on who will invite me. I hope it is parts of the political establishment, and the media including bloggers.
It is not a competition on who gets me first. I will be fair, and I will not prioritize someone over others. All are truly welcome.
That said, if you want to invite me. Please send a mail, and I will be happy to respond.
G-d bless, and may we find a new path in this life, that will guide us to a better world.
There seems to be a lot of discussion and demoralization on the liberal side these days. It is understandable, but it is also a bit embarrasing.
At the end of the day, it seems to me to be a kind of regression. The positions of the 68 are celebrated, and the new ideas Barack and I put forth are kind of closed down.
I understand it, but it is not that efficient when it comes to real live politics.
Around ten years ago, I had this moment of truth in Denmark. It was at my local gym, and there a few migrants were pretty open about their experiences with Danish girls. As they said; over 40 Percent of them had been raped. That being their friends in their local youth club.
You can look at it many ways, but compare this to slavery. When Thoreau fought against slavery, he simply could not see how slaves could be treated like subhumans. North America went to war for that. Because it was wrong. Seen from a humane perspective, the problem is the pain that the slaves suffer in their imprisonment.
So it is the amount of pain that sanctified the civil war of the US. A rape is worse, when a girl is raped, the pain and the suffering will never cease. The trauma is too deep. The enslavement has been internalised, and the person afflicted will never be free and happy again. They can learn to live with it, but their lives have changed forever.
This was what Oriana Fallaci saw when she fought the islamists after she had fought the fascists. The inherent slavementality that is in islamist thinking.
My point is, political progress or development should not be anchored in theories about the world. It should be anchored in the concrete wrongs of the world. What is happening in the world, done by human beings, felt by human beings.
When something is obvious, and has been like that forever, it is hard to change course. But liberation of women is not about getting through the glass ceiling or black womens concieved problems. It is the rapes.
The rapes by a oldfashioned, evil, maledominating, patriarchal, disgusting philosophy that has no reason to be here on earth. And just as the civil war was fought over slavery, this fight againt IS, and yes also the Muslim Brotherhood, is about that same thing. That is inhuman acts.
G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in opposition to defamation of women, and hapy womens liberation day.
The basic problem of Westerne thought is the downfall of German metaphysics. In the aftermath of the second world war, the intellectuals of Germany were more concerned with peace work, than with building edifices of metaphysical thought. Still there are interesting things happening in Germany, but the tradition of Prussia is almost lost.
Almost, because there is a small vestige of that Kantian wisdom that was spread from Prussia in Denmark. We are kind of all that is left of the halls of metaphysics of Königsberg.
When something is lost, it is possible to rebuild, if you work hard and focused enough. It is possible to keep that amazing school of German thought alive, if we support it.
If we do not, it will die. If we do, there is a possibility to live a life of Göethe, Hegel and Kant again.
I am working quite hard on my metaphysical ideas these days. Finally I have a little energy for that. The persecution has vaned some, and my situation has stabilised to some degree.
This I hope will make it possible for all that understands the need of German/Danish thought to be renewed, to take up that baton, and let it on.
Metaphysics is only dead, if we accept it. If we do not accept it, it will live on.
Ok, it is pretty sad, that I did not succeed in my project that was to make a peace between Democrats and Republicans. I tried, and as mr. Trump said right after he was elected. He needed the guidance of Obama.
Well, I am still here, and I will try my best to soothe the hot tempers and play a constructive role. We need to try to unite, and not be divided.
Politically it is possible, but in the facts of the ground work it is not.
But I will try and remain a staunch proponent of unity.
Dirty tricks are, unfortunately a part of politics. Alinsky says it quite openly in his book about politics. If you enter politics, you need to be ready for the punches.
In Europe, it is the same. Persecution, vilification, sometimes even physical threats.
This is why I really admire ms. Hillary Clinton, she is one of the toughest politicians I have ever worked for. Her example is pretty good when it comes to overcoming adversity. She did not win, because mr. Trump is also a pretty good fighter. We must give him that. But she had a good way of getting over all the slander and negative attacks.
One of the worst attacks was just before the first convention, where all the ideas are presented and things start for real. Wikileaks tried to derail the process by publicising some things that ms. Hillary had done wrong. Or I believe it was her secretary.
That is a vile attempt to derail her political process, what she did was admirable, and what convinced me to help her. She fired the person that had done something wrong, and then she just went on fighting.
Turning that attack around must have been a bit of a difficulty. The election process was so tiring.
The same is what happens in France now with ms. le Pen, the EU is trying, with dirty tricks to influence the election. Well, it is equal to what Wikileaks did. It is illegal, but everybody does it, especially if you work with information, and you do not have a direct voice in the election.
But the example of Hillary shows us, that what you do is; fight on. Fight on, and you can actually turn things around.
In the current democratic elections, there are specifically two adherents to my prodemocratic philosophy. Mr. Wilders of the Netherland, and ms. le Pen of France.
I support you, and not only do I support you. I wholeheartedly believe that you are the future of Europe.
Remember the idea behind my philosophy is not a negative, it is a positive. You strive for SOMETHING that something being freedom and the republic.
It is much more than a simple fight against the barbarity of the islamists, it is a fight for the philosophical principle of your state.
That being an illuminated democracy. A way for human beings to live in harmony amongst each other. A dream of a nation that is free and just.
G-d bless the will to be honest in the face of the onslaught of both the EU and the political correct. G-d bless, and now FIGHT!
Sweden has wanted to be a humanistic country. With this, I really feel that we have a common understanding.
In Denmark, I am widely vilified, especially by the other humanists. They see me as a rogue.
But as the LEADING humanist, I believe that they are simply too shallow in their understanding of the current conflicts. Like my predecessors Poul Henningsen and Georg Brandes.
It is called the “supreme enlightenment”. Supreme enlightenment must mean that it is elevated above something.
Elevation can only be, if you are somehow better than something else. In fact, I see my humanistic enlightenment philosophy as above the rest. I truly believe, that I have understood the problems that we face better than my fellow humanists.
Where we differ are in two points. First it is in the handling of Islam. Secondly it is in the understanding of nationhood.
Let us consider the first point. I have never targeted ALL of Islam, but the part that has gone full force on the medieval version of Islam. That is; world domination, killing of heathens, rape as a method of warfare, extermination of innocents Yazidis and so on. What we have come to define as islamists, and the entire world, even other muslims are fighting it around the world.
I believe that the world has proved me right.
Secondly. Nationhood is mentioned in the hermetic scriptures that I have read, over and over and over again. Egypt this, Egypt that, Egypt, Egypt, Egypt. Humanism adores the nation of Egypt.
In fact humanism, in its original form, SUPPORTS the nation.
There is an intricate balance in the philosophy of checks and balances that work within a nation. Going Diogenetian and become a citizen of the world does not work with humanism. You have to choose either, and in fact, Diogenes ended up as a slave, because he lost all his money and had nothing to protect him. All humans need a nation.
So far my solution is the MOST humane that I have possibly could figure out. War is terrible, especially a war with an enemy that finds rape as a tool acceptable. So we need to realise, that if and when we fight, atrocities are a part of fighting. The difficult thing in a fight is to keep the professional and humane attitude to the fight, and not engage in mass slaughter and extermination of the opponent.
Therefor my solution has been to repatriate migrants that have entered Europe. This solution keeps the fighting to a minimum, and leaves both parties alive.
G-d bless the will to find humane solutions to difficult problems.
When we talk about enlightenment, we, as I have lectured about, end up in Egypt with the Egyptian sun g-d Ra.
But enlightenment is greater than just the fight between light and darkness. Ra had an opponent, the G-d Apap. Apap that is depicted as a snake is defined by darkness and chaos.
Ra is defined as light and order.
This is a reminder of what light ALSO is. It leads to order. Darkness leads to chaos.
We can see it in very closed organisations as the EU. The EU is made as a closed system, where armies of bureaucrats define the welfare of the citizens.
What is the most obvious state of EU; chaos.
The currency the euro has led to chaos, the open borders policy has led to chaos, the migration policy has led to chaos. In fact, this is what the populace is really so angry about in Europe. That wherever EU takes decision, chaos comes.
The mechanics of this is pretty obvious. When the eurocrats decide something without any serious discussion, the usuals checks and balances that is in a democracy or an aristocracy has been dismantled. Therefor decisions that usually would not be possible to take in an open society is taken, and chaos comes.
So we have a definition on certain principles or mechanical structures that a society needs to have to work. Transparency and order.
Why is it then, that these things are important?
Seen from a metaphysical point of view, I still can’t figure it out. I can see it works like that, but why?
That is a philosophical question of the grand scale.
I believe that I am pretty much spot on in regards to the strategies that I have developed for the US.
The Americans are not ready for a prolonged battle on the ground losing too many soldiers. Yes a few here and there, but there is no support for a huge campaign.
There is also a priority when it comes to targets. The targets have to be evil, guntoting islamists to really make sense to the public.
Where American lives however are possible to give is in Europe. As the conflicts are heating up, the fight will eventually end up in Western Europe.
To redirect resources to this fight within NATO makes sense, and the fighting will start perhaps tomorrow or rather at any true given point. We need to be ready for that. Because this fight will be pretty bad.
G-d bless the sacrifices our brave people in the revolutionary wing of the United States of America. May they spread the light of Democracy.
When we talk about enlightenment, we need to go to the true source of its inception to really understand what it is.
Enlightenment is truly a reflection of the faith in the sun as a G-d.
Its inception is in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis, or the city of light. So we are in Egypt, and in its world of G-ds and G-ddesses.
What is an Egyptian G-d? It is usually an animalistic representation of a natural principle. So Ra, the sun god is a hawk. Since somehow the Egyptians found that the hawk represents the rays of the sun.
So in essence, illumination is the principle of light that we believe in.
At a given time, light was equaled to truth, so that illumination to men is the spread of truth as the light.
This connection between light and truth I honestly do not know when came or how it makes a theoretical connection.
But I do know, that it happened somewhere in Egypt in ancient times.
After that seeing truth as light is proven empirically over and over again. In politics, journalism, religion and human matters in general.
How to make enlightenment work has become an art, even though it usually does not work.
You can see it in my example where society persecutes me, or rather the police persecutes me for bringing too much light into the society.
The police is tied with chains as big as they can get NOT to chain me. It is in their education. It is in the constitution and so on and so forth. Nevertheless, still they do not obey the rules but keep on coming. It does not work, or rather in this case, with the danish system it did not work, to the shame of Denmark.
Nonetheless, at a metaphysical level, the discussion is; what is light, and how do we understand this natural force in the context of society.
G-d bless the willingness to understand things at a deeper level.
Sweden is in trouble, deep, deep trouble. I think that everybody realises this.
The problem is, what do we do about it?
First of all, there is one item of discussion that has some merit to it.
The idea of humanism. To be a humanist, you are entitled to one specific virtue, above them all. Enlightenment. You are, first and foremost, sworn to seek truth be it dangerous or not.
This is what enlightenment is all about, and that is much more important than care taking of the planet and treat people as individuals.
This is the problem with Sweden and the rest of the Scandinavian Socialists countries. The idea of searching and looking for truth has been dismantled in the tyranny of the minorities.
We have to be honest about the terrible things that migrants do to the native population. Otherwise we are NOT humanists.
It is a balance. You can only be caretaking of the weak and of each individual, if you, at the same time, are able to look at all moral actions.
The more freedom you give people, the more you must enforce the hard regiment of truth seeking.
Because the liberty of the individual will also give room for moral degration and outright evil.
That is why we say, that on the eve of the Apocalypse the terribly strong angel Michael will arise and blow in his horn for all the fighters of light. Fighting the sons of darkness.
You have lived in darkness, you need to open your doors and windows and eyes for what is happening in Sweden, as Denmark and Norway have to do the same.
This is in order to find out what is truly right and wrong in these things.
When you let people from the most war torn and evil places in the world into your country, there is a possibility that they will take their way of thinking with them. If they do, and start acting like they have done in their home country, they are wrong and evil. Simple as that.
You need to be true humanists in the true sense to turn the boat around.
It will be hard and painful, but humanism is not easy or a walk in the park. It goes against all that is easy and corrupt. It is painful to look truth in its eyes, but it is what humanists do.
G-d bless the ability to be free in thinking and understanding.
It has come to my knowledge, that my good friend has been accused of blasphemy.
He burned the Koran, and as a consequence, he has been charged by the state with disregard and lack of respect for Islam.
Well, remember ten years ago, when the entire muslim world burned Danish flags. Remember that?
This is precisely the same. We Danes do not accept, that some supergovermental body finds it appropriate to enlarge our population with some of the most extreme islamist in the world.
WE DO NOT ACCEPT IT!
And you can prosecute, persecute, put us on a stake, vilify us, RAPE OUR DAUGHTERS!
But WE WILL NOT BEND to your corrupt, dishonourable ideas that TAKES AWAY OUR FREEDOM TO EXPRESS OURSELVES. We will stand and fight, from here on and to whenever is the end.
Well, being a musician, I often think about the former intellectual leaders of the world, because they were themselves musicians. Bob Dylan, Niel Young, David Bowie, Savage Rose here in Denmark and so on.
What is it really that has changed from the rule of the musicians to now?
First of all, the media has changed. Before it was music, that was radio, festivals, young people listening to their favourite band in their teenage dystopia.
Now it is blogs, blogs, blogs. Breibart, Afpixlat, Uriasposten, Milo Yannopoulis, my blog.
That is; written words. The best blogs out there, to my mind, are the outcasts of the society. The people that never really made it in the mainstream because they were too rebellious, too different, to ethical.
What drives a blog is not money or fame. Neither is usually the product of your vast labour. But a sincere and true urge,or rather fire, to do good.
A pure ethical rage.
What makes a blog succeed, especially a political blog, is depth, sincerity, ability to write and then just the gruesome work of feeding your blog, day after day, after day.
So the few people who actually succeed in the blogosphere are usually a certain rare hippie kind of type, who are willing to sacrifice all for the sake of humanity.
The idealist.
So we come from a world, where the intellectual leaders of it had tons of money, a lot of easy attention, and well… a rock star status. To a world where the intellectual leaders are suffocation from all kinds of persecution and ridicule, live a life of misery and makes absolutely no money.
This is a huge change, because the kind of persons who are attracted to the blogosphere are different from the persons who are attracted to the music world.
The nerds are ruling again.
Before the second world war, that is before all of the world went into ashes. The world was moved forward by writers. Not journalists, but, true book producing writers. Marx, Voltaire, Kierkegaard, Hegel, Göethe, Newton and so on.
These people were much more altruistic than the bloggers, and deeper.
So we have come to a kind of middle ground between the musicians and philosophers of before the industrial revolution.
I do strive to be like my ideals, but I also admit, that I am not. I could be, if I was able to write books again. But my living conditions simply do not allow me to do so. I have to make money for my family, and at the same time write here on Rubicon.
But I suppose, that is just how the world is today. No time for writing books as an intellectual, and only time for blogging.
It is off cause better than what it used to be, but I still long back to the times where the world was driven even more by very, very deep thought.
G-d bless the will to understand the world and make it better.
Now, there are a lot of discussion on how to tackle the islamists.
First of all, we have a good strategical case, but it is not easy.
We have kind of left the war weariness of the Bush era. That was due to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Two very costly wars in terms of manpower, lives and money.
War is much more than power struggle. It is lives on the ground. Our soldiers pay a heavy price for the fighting, ruined lives, and sometimes the highest price.
So we owe them an honest discussion on the costs of war.
On the other hand, it is pretty obvious that the islamists are openly threatening not only the U.S. but the rest of the West and East as well.
The megalomania is pretty obvious, but their prowess on the ground is pretty impressive.
First of all, what is, to my mind, extremely important, is to recognize that it is the Muslim Brotherhood that is behind most of the islamist movements. IS is just one of the branches.
This makes it a bit more easy to recognise our allies in the Middle East.
First and foremost, in this fight, Egypt. Egypt is actively fighting the Muslim Brotherhood and IS as well. Supporting them, with all we have, is a no brainer.
We should like to see some development in terms of human rights and enlightenment. But that is in the interest of Egypt as well, since human rights is an Egyptian tradition. Humanism comes from Egypt.
The Ankh and the care taking of the human come from Heliopolis. The city of light.
Secondly Germany is an essential ally. Germany is recognising the importance of fighting islamists in general, because it is beset with a lot of them.
So an Egyptian/German axe would make sense.
What we do not need is for all of Sunni islam to go Apocalyptic. So here again Egypt is a force that draws in the right direction, not to mention that the great islamic university Al Azhar is in Egypt. Egypt also has a tradition of not vilifying Christians.
If we see the fightings inside of the Middle East, and are willing to pick our sides with wisdom, we will be seen as a Middle East player at the level of the rest of the players. Right now we are seen as an external force.
It is important to know your enemy as you know yourself.
We are not really into Middle East lore, but we could be, and that would lift some of the heavy weighting without us using physical force.
The Middle East is the birth cradle of the civilisation of man. They are still extremely proud of that, as they should be. If we manage to see them as they truly are, and handle them with due respect, we can perhaps play a more civilised and enlightened role in the conflict.
When we talk about HOW to strategise. I believe we should see our enemy as they are. They are much different from us, but they have their beliefs and ideals. We find them wrong, but we should not let us be fooled by the fact that they see it as right.
We should also discuss their new strategies, that is guerrilla warfare with drones added to it.
They got that from me, and are serving them quite well. I just hope, that our side has learned as well.
Sending in grunts WITHOUT the umbrella of high tech drones would cost a lot of lives.
We need to strategize wisely here, and look at the exit strategy as well as the next steps of the war.
The war is moving to Europe, and we have to be ready for that.
We are working on changing NATO to meet this threat, but we need to see the war as it will come. The new development of NATO should include gurreillawarfare in cities.
In fact, most of the fighting should be redirected to that aim. This will, in practise, mean; grunts on the ground, controlling small and large drones with reconnaissance capabilities and the ability to enter houses and deliver a payload.
Europe is entering one of those hells it has been in so many times. We need to be ready to get it over with as fast as possible.
G-d bless the willingness to be honest and strong.
To truly understand the way of the world. One could understand the way power works.
As a political player for some ten years now, I have begun to understand, that what drives the world is the METHOD people use to gain their say.
There are different approaches.
The most base is the way of violence. Some call it war, some call it “the rule of the strong”. At this very basic level people use fear to push their agenda.
That is why we have law. To suppress the rule of the strong, and protect the weak.
At the next level, we have the method of leverage. This method is usually used in criminal organisations and secret services. They ensure that they “get something on you”, and then pressure you to bend to their wills.
This method is off cause basically criminal and corrupt, and it does not work on people who are ethical and want to change the world to a better place.
That is why it is extremely annoying to be at the hard end of the secret service here in Denmark, because they insist not only on their urge to control, but more insidiously on applying their METHOD on my life. If and when I accept their ideas, they have corrupted me. That is a danger.
The third level of power brokering is networking. That is how politics works. You are as powerful as the extent of your network. The closer you get to the center of the network, that is the prime minister, the more powerful you are.
The political players, they give you access to the network at the level of your perceived power as such. Or rather, you get power the more you succumb to flattery and other types of sycophantic behaviour. That is why you see all the most disgusting intellectuals in represented in the media and other places of intellectual interest. They are there because they are good at “networking”.
The most powerful method of power brokerage is however neither of the above. The most powerful player of all, is the person who fights for a cause.
The political player that wants to do good, and has a righteous cause.
Ethics is at the bottom of his political warfare.
Usually these creatures are rare. They are one in a million, the other players succumbing to the other means of power brokering.
Nonetheless, the thing is, only if the few idealists truly survive and thrive in a corrupt environment will democracy survive.
The more corrupt a state is, the less breathing room is there for the enlightener.
Sweden is in a lot of trouble. BUT it is truly possible to turn the tide. If Sweden wants.
First of all, it is about realising the MORAL content beneath the conflicts we are witnessing right now.
On one side, we have civilisation, at the other side we have chaos.
Not all migrants are chaotic, but some are. These migrants have different motivations for their chaotic behaviour, some are just mean people, others are POLITICALLY driven.
It is extremely important to categorise each problem and act accordingly.
Sweden is not weak. It is just off trail.
In 68 ts, Sweden went all in on American liberalism. A philosophy deeply engendered with some false flag ideas. Dont get me wrong, there were, and is a lot good ideas in the American tradition. Among them Thoreau and his ideas of nonviolence. But the Franfurterschool that came with the same batch was not good, and that is what is wreaking havoc on Sweden now.
What you need to do. Is to follow and especially follow Germany.
Germany has picked up my ideas of solving the problems with mass migration. That is repatriating all the non aligning migrants. That is migrants that are in category one or two.
Germany needs help in this process, and Sweden could team with Germany and work together.
Nonetheless, you have to do it NOW.
This is not racist or against minorities. This is FOR democracy. Because if you get too many migrants in, that despise the law and the right to free speech, then there is no more democracy.
Nevertheless, you have to move in a fast manner.
You can do this, with all your ability as organisers, and critical system understanding.
You are good at so many things, use this to save Sweden.
G-d bless the will to be swift and honest in ones approach.
There has been a lot of discussion of the media and its role in a modern democracy.
I have been at the negative end of the Danish media for around ten years, so naturally this has had som implications on my own existence as a writer and as an intellectual.
But seen in a historical view, we may be able to see what is coming.
When media was initially invented, as a part of the French Revolution. It was a tool of enlightenment. The idea was, that lies and secrets was an enemy to the Republic.
These ideas stem from a humanistic ideology represented, among other things in the Statue of Liberty, that the U.S. got from France.
The next great step in media development was in the workings of the Nazi media. Goebbels was master in MANIPULATING the public. He devised a decrepit and destructive system where Jews and other enemies of the German state were depicted as evil animals. Propaganda was born.
Contrary to most public opinion, these tools of statecraft did not die with the nazies, but lived on in the Soviet Union. In the Soviet Union, the propaganda was put to good (bad) use.
Somehow in the 68 generation, they sucked up the ideas in some form in the West, and it has been a part of the way media operate in the West since.
To be honest, the western media is a mix of French Revolution ideals and Nazi ideas.
How does this manifest?
It manifests in the LACK of covering certain issues that the socialist media deem off limit. That is mainly migration, Islam, Nationalism and so on. If you touch these areas, the media will often react with cutting you off.
At the same time it still tries to tackle corruption in the state and so on. So it is not all corrupted and influenced by nazi ideas. But only half.
So what happens now?
Let me give you an example.
When the Russians won the war over Nazi Germany, they accidentally killed a lot of civilian Germans at the east front, simply because the civilians DID NOT KNOW that they were coming. The Nazi media had kept them in the dark about it, and continued feeding the public lies about the way the war went.
So not until the Germans could actually hear the Russians coming did the consider fleeing.
This is truly how propaganda works, by EMITTING certain truths that is deemed unwanted for the public. Putting a lid on and so on.
But as happened to the Soviet Union, the reality on the streets became so different to what the media purported, so people realized they have been lied to. Or people start getting news in other ways.
Now BOTH mechanisms are working against the media agenda. In Europe, the happy multicultural Eden is not exactly appearing, and the Internet has brought a hitherto unknown freedom of expression.
Now you can scream as much as you want, if people can get their news from other sources than what they are used to, they will.
Here the media has a huge problem. The ambivalence between French Revolution ideals of free speech, and the Nazi ideals.
On one hand they buy into the Socratic ideals, at the other hand, these ideals lead to a problem in stopping the competition from blogs.
The infiltration of universities and media simply does not work anymore.
Propaganda still work in North Korea, because it is hermetically sealed. But it does not work in the West.
This is a wake up moment for the media. My solution has been to get rid of the Nazi ideas, and go full tilt on the humanistic ideas. Shed all the ideas of control and truly enlighten the world.
In this sense I believe that this blog is an ideal to the media.
But, we will see, and one thing is certain, I will NEVER be invited into the Dansh media, the hate is too strong.
When I started my political/philosophical career, it was as an intellectual on the far right wing. One of the main new features of this development, was to renew a pro Semitic view of the conservatives.
As time has gone by, and things have developed, it has been obvious to me, that this idea is loosing a bit of its strength.
Lately we have seen the AfD not really digging into the pro Semitic ideas, and also ms. Le Pen is a bit less inclined to follow my lead on this.
It is ok, you are my philosophical children, but let my first give you a but deeper insight into the how’s and whys.
Nationalism is much more than identity politics, it is, basically a striving for a polis like ideology that was firstly invented in the Mesopatamian area with famed cities as Babylon and Eden.
It is a system that is slowly developed through millennia. It is much more than just the frame around a people, it is a system that has been time proven.
The deeper stratification of these ideas are however mostly forgotten in the realm of academia, though we still can trace them in the work of great philosophers as Plato and Aristotle.
But, and this is important, it is a system, that we need to strive to uphold to make work, otherwise is disappears in moral corruption. As we see these days, and you all know to be true. You fight this moral corruption, as you should, and as it is advised in all the old scriptures.
BUT, and this is where pro semitism comes in. There is a natural ideal that we all strive for, a kind of arch nation that serves as an ideal. Both spiritually as well as in practice. A kind of reversed Babylon.
That nation is called Israel.
Ideally Jews are the caretakers of the First Nation. That is the system.
So nationalism cannot be antisemitic in its core. It would be against the very nature of nationalism.
Now Jews have their burdens to bear. Because being chosen to lead and make the First Nation is a truly gigantic task. It will leave precious little room for mistakes. Jews are struggling to fulfill this task, and we are getting somewhere at least. But it is truly difficult.
But the system has this structure for a reason. The reason being, that the system and ideology of a nation is a striving for good.
A striving for a harmonious and just society. A society where one is free.
Add to this the home of religion, you can see, that the bar is truly put high.
We should seriously strive to put that bar high, to truly fulfill the ideology of a nation.
It is complicated, but it is also possible.
However, to strive for goodness is always that; not a fixed point, but a star in the horizon, that we will perhaps never reach, but we always strive to reach. The entirety of our lives. Because the Nation requires this for us; for us to strive to make a solid and wonderful basis under our nation.
That is what Israel is. And that is why it is so important to be friends with the Jews. Because even though Jews are not perfect, they know, that this truly what it is to be Jewish and be good. And they know that the world judges us, on this conduct.
The U.K. is at a crossroads. The old regime is falling, and a new is slowly rebuilt. As one of the architects behind this new order, I profoundly believe that it will be better.
There are some challenges ahead, so we need to concentrate on a civilised and progressive handling of these issues.
It all goes hand in hand with the fall of the empire, and the rebuilding of an alternative.
Here, new signs from her majesty, bring me hope. She is not someone to be trifled with, and I think she will save the U.K..
But how? And how do we do it in a manner that will ensure humanity as well.
Here I think that the Anglican church will have a pivotal role, since it is a body of wise men and women, as well as a strong intellectual community.
We however need to be realistic about the challenges we meet, we have to openly discuss them, and act accordingly.
I love Oxford, and it has long become a goal of mine to return there.
We need to save the U.K. and the England.
To do that, we need to specify the dangers, and build on the strengths.
The strength of the Anglican Church is faith. No more, no less. But not a confronting or aggressive faith per se. A defensive faith in the sense, that to have faith is defended.
It is right to be a Christian, as it is right to have any faith.
We should start there, and then build from there. This includes a conservative agenda, politically as well. Faith should be the foundation of our political decisions.
When I began my political career, it was as an extreme right wing. Or rather it was at that position, and I believe that I pushed the conservative political position away from an antisemitic, pronazi perspective to a pro semitic liberal perspective.
The current fight with islamism is a fight for freedom, justice and a western civilisation.
After some time I hooked up with mr. Obama, and still held on to the same ideas, but as American politics in total is much more natural conservative, it made sense.
But now the outset of my political career is blooming and wreaking havoc around Europe, France especially with Front National is a philosophy catching fire. As always with France.
Philosophy on fire, that is France.
Now, I could turn political correct and denounce my children of the first part of my political life, but that is not me. Once a friend always a friend, and I will continue to support the children of my first philosophy, among them Mr. Wilders and Ms. le Pen.
Good luck Marine le Pen, I support you.
And look what she is saying, that is a revolution right there.
G-d bless France, and may he live for another thousand years.
When I first entered politics, it was at a specific occasion. I recall it as it was yesterday, I was at the local gym, and I overheard two young migrants talking in the gym. Like, you know, listening to their conversation by chance. The one said, “you know, I think half of the girls in my club have been raped”.
It kind of struck me, and ever since, I have thought of it as my Wittenberg moment. It made me “stand here, and be able to do no other”, as Luther said.
I other words, the moral depravity of the utterance propelled me to where I am today.
Because, you may read a lot in the media, or blogs. This can be manipulated or false news, or whatever it is called. But to hear it yourself, then you just have to believe it.
I am reading a lot of Henry David Thoreau these days, the philosopher that is behind the civil rights movement, Ghandi and of course Martin Luther King. Here is a citation of his:
“Action from principle—the perception and the performance of right—changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary, and does not consist wholly with anything which was. It not only divides states and churches, it divides families; ay, it divides the individual, separating the diabolical in him from the divine.” (“Walden” by Henry David Thoreau)
In other words, if you do recognize that something is wrong, and you stand up against this wrong, then it changes the society all the way down to the smallest unit, the family. People disagree, are not satisfied with your ideas and so on. Nonetheless, that is what Change is all about.
Thoreau changed the world in relation to slavery, right. He looked at it, and concluded that it was basically wrong. Slavery of human beings is wrong.
Thoreau goes on and on about moral conviction, about standing up for something. Here is another quote I like.
“Oh for a man who is a man, and, as my neighbor says, has a bone in his back which you cannot pass your hand through!”
In other words, having a moral backbone is important to Thoreau.
Now, what about that incident when I overheard the migrants talking about the rape of the young girls at their club. What is really the moral content of that?
First of all, it is pretty clear, that it is wrong. Rape will destroy a young girls life, will change them for the worse. It will make them scared and will limit their range of freedom. It is, by all means a vicious and evil deed.
NOT doing anything about a situation where one is witness to such an evil act, is depraved and wrong.
Now, the Scandinavian states have long hidden the fact, that young girls are repeatedly raped and molested. The public parts of the state are actively downgrading the real numbers.
If you speak up on these issues, you are actively persecuted by the state attorney (here I speak out of my own personal experience) and you are punished with a range of other things. You cannot publish books if you are an intellectual, you cannot get a job that suits your qualifications. In my case, I have been hit with the “Mafia” method, that is persecution by the state in material matters. Add to this an infiltration of all that I have ever been a part of, including my family.
This is the sentence the public deals out to one who speaks up about the rapes.
Thoreau went to jail for a day. His comment was pretty cool I think. He felt free for the first time. Now, the modern states are different from the state that Thoreau had to confront. In a sense, it is much more depraved since it does not give me an opportunity to discuss the accusations at court. So the usual system of checks and balances is simply foregone.
There is no court for me, just a blind judge, persecutioner and policeman in one. No justice for me.
It has been around ten years now. That is a long time, longer than Thoreaus one day. So compared to Thoreau, it is a stronger sentence. But basically it is the same.
The children of Thoreau, Martin Luther King, Ghandi among others, were not so lucky as to have just one day at prison. They were actively persecuted by the state as well.
But that is how it is to fight a corrupted state, it is fringed with horrors, jail sentences and persecution.
What we however have to remember, is that it is about being honest, right? Having that principled mind that Thoreau and others think about. Confronting things that are wrong.
Raping young girls is wrong, and I will continue to fight for the freedom and the wellbeing of these young persons, until I am no more. I will not bend for a treat or a threat. Because it is wrong, and those who seek to enforce it or to cover up for it, are equally wrong. These are the new slave masters of the 21 century. The despicable, dishonest members of state, who seek to enforce more humiliation of youngs girls, and give them more pain.
This is who we revolutionise for. Not slaves of a slavefarm owner. But tyranny from a corrupted state, using young girls as cannon fodder to an end I actually even do not really understand.
G-d bless the will to be honest and principled and humane in the face of evil.
While as the rest of the West and, in reality, the world is reaching for unity and trying to crack down on the extremity of organizations like IS, Denmark is wheeled right in the opposite direction.
My own organisation the Vilks committee has just been accused, again with another bogus criminal act. My friend Uwe has had the audacity to name the assailant of another islam critic mr. Hedegaard. A certain Basil Hassan. This used to be illegal, in order to “protect” Basic Hassan.
The US has asked Denmark to lift the ban, since it is, in all honesty a protection of an Islamic State fighter. I mean whose side are you on?
So Denmark lifted the ban, but not on my friend Uwe Max Jensen. He has still got to go to court for naming Basil Hassan before they lifted the ban. Talk about a machiavellian system?
So Uwe, the leader of the Vilks Committee, who was attacked by another terrorist one and a half years ago, has to pay a fine because he named another terrorist by name. The rules fall away, but STILL Uwe has to pay the fine.
This is ridiculous, and it is, honestly, persecution by the Danish state.
Add to this, the disgusting charge on mr. Finn Rudaizky, Denmark has gone all AWOL.
I think this, honestly discredit Denmark so much, that we have to take the membership of NATO into consideration.
I mean, if the new focus of NATO is to combat IS, then Denmark, is not a natural member, to say the least.
G-d bless the will to be honest.
This posting is private and not a public announcement for the Vilks comitee.
I see that mr. Bernie Sanders is reaching out for mr. Trump. The specific case is a discussion on the price of medicine in the US. Honestly, I do not know anything about it.
But it shows to me, that some parts of the Democratic party is not all in anti Trump. Well done Bernie, constructive, idealistic and honest.
This is the way forward, I think.
If you mr. Trump could please look at what mr. Sanders is proposing, it would be a great show of trying to reach across the aisles and start unifying and mending wounds in this difficult time.
Things are happening pretty quickly these days, one of the best things, to me, is that we have turned down the volume of the anti russian rhetoric, and started to wheel NATO towards a more terrorist focused aim.
This is huge. I still believe that we should not forget Eastern Europe. They need our assurances as well. They a family.
But, the focus of NATO on anti islamist work has some pretty huge implications. Because, as Germany has just showed, IS is not only dug in in Iraq and Syria, but holds a lot of power in Western Europe. The crack down on several jihadi mosques shows this.
What we then have here is a mix of internal as well of external policies. Internal in the sense that these terrorist reside and live inside Europe, so normally they are under the jurisdiction of the police and not the military.
Here we have som legal issues we have to work together on.
In all probability internal as well as external forces will meld together to some extent, we just have to be absolutely clear on the how and whys. We are talking about using military forces in our own territory.
We also have to be realistic about the extent of the threat. It is as much mainstream mosques that are a problem as more extreme mosques. We have to be honest about this. Otherwise we plan without knowing the terrain.
So, well done gentlemen and gentlewomen, well done.
Germany is in trouble. Not alone because it has had an uprising in anti jewish sentiment, that is hopefully finished now. But more so, because Germany is not able to protect its most vulnerable citizens. That is women on the street.
Listen, I truly like Germany. I have been there many times, both on vacation and with my samba group, playing at the festivals.
To me modern Germans are happy, open-minded, nice even though I must say, that when Germans do parades, they are awfully good at marching. To be an enemy to Germany is a pretty tough thing I imagine.
Nonetheless, be as it may, things are developing, and Germany is not where it was at the time of Hitler. Germany is prosperous, international and very liberal.
The problem is the guilt. Because you tried to kill, among others, my great grandmother. Jews tend to have a pretty bleak view of Germany. I understand, and, honestly, I do agree.
But this history does not sanctify the horrors that the German populace is going through right now, with the onslaught of the migrants.
They have no respect, what so ever. Add to this a mounting salafi movement, and there you have it; a tragedy and horror story.
You need to turn that around, and honestly, if the migrants do not respect you Germans, and especially your women, throw them out, for G-ds sake. They should respect their host, and if they do not do that, they have overstayed their welcome.
Be humane about it, but stop the vigilantes, the molesters, and use force if necessary.
Well, I think that the big question about mr. Trump is; does he or does he not listen to a Democratic perspective?
First of all, mr. Trump is extremely new to the political game. So we cannot expect him to be professional in the sense that we would normally expect from an insider. He is doing things his own way.
In essence, he has had a huge business empire for as long as he can remember. This empire was his, and he could, do whatever he wanted.
That is the way it is to be an owner of a business. Business is not democratic in any way, but much more aristocratic. In a sense.
Now parliament is different. Here we shuffle ideas back and forth and reach a compromise at the end. We wait for the other side to make his case and so on.
In a way, it is refreshing that mr. Trump does not know how to do things, he just does it his way. That is acting, acting, acting.
It ruffles our feathers, but, hey, why not turn it the other way around, and ask ourselves; is it good with all this talk and very little action? I mean, there is a reason why the electorate is so tired of us, because of exactly that; the gridlock. Not doing anything.
Maybe WE should be a little open to what mr. Trump is doing, and play along constructively.
I mean, at least he listens to me.
What I have done in the past with mr. Netanyahu, whom I have a very good relationship with, is to help, guide, be at service, but then, if there is something that is really important to me, I make it very clear. Like when Israel almost send in the entire army to quell the third intifada. This was too much, and it was counterproductive to the fight against IS.
This he listened to, and it actually paid off in a support from Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
My feeling is, that it is the same with mr. Trump. He likes having an opinion presented, then he thinks about it, and makes his own conclusion, which is what he is supposed to do.
One example is the waterboarding procedure. That is torture. This is wrong, and a case that I have spoken up about, actually together with numerous republican senators.
This is a case, I believe we should make, and do.
There is a lot of hysteria regarding some of the issues he presents. These illegitimate methods will get os nowhere. Honestly it is just blackmailing, and we should be above that. Nonetheless, honest discussion and a fair critical stance will get us somewhere.
We have a country to take care of. That is much more important than our feelings. We should rise above our feelings, and enter a solid and honest discussion.
Then, if mr. Trump does not listen. We should start pushing against him. Nevertheless, we need to give him a chance, he is one of us, remember? We could get along, if we just kept our heads clear.
G-d bless the willingness to be honest and constructive.
In the second world war, and in most other parts of history, Jews have, stoically, accepted their fate.
When Hitler reigned, and cursed the earth with his despicable actions, most people accepted it. Afterwards, everybody was simply horrified, but in the time, they were silent.
This time we have a state. If there is any meaning in having a state. Then it should, at least, give its full support for mr. Finn Rudaizky in his trial with the Danish system of persecution.
This is where it all starts, right? If they can get away with persecuting the first Jew (me, remember), they will continue to the next.
I understand that I am a difficult character, but mr. Finn Rudaizky is a respected former head of the Mosaic believers.
Instead of running away, we should fight. Not just accept our fate, but stand up for Jews, as they are persecuted by European states, in a collaboration with disgusting islamic state members.
Finn had this trial thrown at him, because he deliberately leaked to the press, that the city council had looked the other way, as the perpetrator was entering a jihadi lifestyle.
So they think that is very important. Finn did this, because another Jew was murdered.
It is equally clear to what lengths the state is willing to go, to make things look legitimate.
They are always trying to bend the rules, but still stay within the rules. So as to make it look acceptable.
Is that a trend we know? Making a brave face of legitimately while trying to “get the Jew”?
Disgusting, but I will not let this case go through without some light shone upon it.
G-d bless the willingness to defend Jews despite the cost of public ridicule.
This is a difficult time in history. Old systems fall, new emerge, and in between, the players are cast hither and there.
We are leaving the 68´s world and we are entering mine.
Simple as that.
That is an enlightened, honest world, where we strive for harmony.
But the shift can turn violent. This is why I very, very much urge all parts to keep their heads clear. We are not heading for some racist, neo nazi, templar world.
We are working on a world that is pure in the sense, that feelings are in harmony. This world is not a viking world, it is a mix of different world, that live, side by side in harmony.
There are some that are vikings, some are Catholics, some that are Protestants and so on. We live side by side.
When the media laments their demise, please, do not see this as a fall down, see it as a new beginning. There is a place for media in the new world. It is a much better place. Because what the world truly needs is a vanguard of fearless enlightenment.
You cannot any longer define who are the good guys or the bad guys, the politicians do not care anymore for your opinion. They go with the bloggers, because we are much more serious.
It has been like that for some time now. You just didn’t figure it out because it was mr. Obama that did the pulling of strings. But me, I am not a newspaper. Yes I had a formal education as a newsman, but this is not a newspaper, it is a blog.
I hope, that what we end up having, is a much more enlightened place, where we actually care for the truth, and stop being so craven and disgusting, have a little honour.
But that will obviously take a little while.
But, we will wait for that. Until then I suppose we just have to witness the toe creeping lamentation of the dethroned media.
Well, as I see it, development is always, basically a moral thing. Take things from the past. When Henry David Thoreau developed the civil rights movement, with its civil disobedience credo, he did it because the slavestate the southern US was, was wrong.
When Mahatma Ghandi liberated India, he did it, because the colonisation was wrong.
Ethically, morally wrong.
But the fact of the matter is, that in their time, they were not seen as morally right, on the contrary, they were seen as wrong. Thoreau were imprisoned, Ghandi was expelled from the lawyers community.
Today, the writing on the wall is truly different. What is wrong today is not what was wrong seventy years ago. Today the victims are the former slave owners.
Brits living on the fair isles of Brittania, having their daughters raped. Danes who see their wealthfarestate disappear. Sweden that is a living hell.
These are the new victims. It is therefor morally right to defend them.
The Pim fortuyns and the Ayan Hirsi Ali, and me, are the Mahatma Ghandis and David Thorueas of this age.
If you cannot see that, then you are not capable of moral sentiment.
G-d bless the willingness to be honest, and see the world as it is.
When you are under pressure, you need to look a little inwards to accept and see WHY you are in trouble. Troubled times calls for reflection and understanding of the whys and the hows, so that you can find new solutions.
One thing I truly believe ms. Clinton had right, was what was in herself. All the ideas of multiculturalism and minority rights are off cause liberal ideas. But if you looked beyond these common ideas, and really looked at ms. Clinton. She had one quality we can learn from; she cared, first and foremost for the child.
When you look at it from the perspective of the child, many of the priorities of the current policies does not make much sense.
What does a child need? It needs a firm foundation. That is, it needs a family. The family it needs is often not a fancy family. But just a totally, normal family, with normal parents, in a boring little village, somewhere far away. A place where few things happen, and we are seeing the same people over and over again. Good friends, a harmonious school, a good teacher.
That is the priority of the child.
Now, fighting for womens liberation, does that add or subtract to those needs? It subtracts.
Now, fighting for gay rights, does that add or subtract to the needs of the child? It subtracts.
Now fighting for all muslims, indesrimenatebly, does that add or subtract to the needs of a child. Well that is a minus, as our children realised in the rock concert in Bataclan.
You know, my point is, that most of the policies we have been bartering are actually directly against the needs of our children. Just think about that.
Now, I still really do believe we should fight for minorities, but it is truly, in time, that we do a reality check, and get our priorities right.
Now, the dictatorship of the minorities is an idea of the Frankfurterschool. These eggheads never lived in the real life, but lived a life of academians without much grounding.
These are not the types we wish to follow. We wish to follow those, who actually live a live. Who are doing the things themselves that they preach. Like Hillary Clinton.
When I work with children. It seems to me, that their parents, and those who are supposed to be most pro children are often the opposite.
The liberals, they work too much. Caring too much about career, and their “rightful” place in society.
To care for children is to give, not to have. To give your career, not taking it. Sacrifising yourself for the wellbeing of your those you care most for.
Here I am not talking about ONLY the women, but both ways, men AND women.
But at the end of the day, the best thing you can do, is to look at where you stand, and try to figure out, how YOUR life will succeed. Not just what everybody else around you may have of ideas.
Look besides you, what do you see there? You see those loving, caring vulnerable eyes, perhaps it is time for us to truly take care of those small little beings besides us, instead of just living our stupid ideas out.
The media hysteria and the hysteria in other parts of the liberal part of our party is simply dishonouring. We lost, I fought hardest of all, I lost. But when you lose, you have to take it standing up. Otherwise it is just terribly embarrassing.
I have never lost an election before, and yet this one I lost, so for me it was demoralising.
Nonetheless, here we are, one week into the Trump administration, and the things that I and Obama have worked on are flourishing. Even the hallmark policies of Barack are left alone.
In terms of policy, this is an astounding victory.
What we have lost, and in fact, I think that is good for us, is the power of the media.
Complete power corrupts, and we have been corrupted.
We just have to realise, that our power has gone from 90% to 10% in a week.
That is the way it is.
If we look at the basis of our policies, one thing truly shines as a problem. The Frankfurtschool. Until now, it has been the tyranny of the minorities. Do not have me wrong, minorities should be protected, but not given a dictatorship whip.
Liberal policies are not that. Liberalism is humanism. The ability to view the individual as one beautiful harmonious being. To see nature in all its glory. To enlighten the world. To strive for harmony.
We need to shift focus, and shift theoretical allegiance.
We have to be civil right movement oriented again. Not against all those who do not like our minorities, but for the beauty of the individual.
As Henry David Thoreau said when he observed the flourishing of an acorn besides a pine sprout. Each sprout was fiercely THEMSELVES, individual. They grew up side by side, and would grow up until the strongest survived. That is off cause uncivilised, we need to curb the will the strong. However, we need to support the beauty of the individual being.
Well mr. trump. Things are moving in the right direction, but it is very difficult.
Blitz politicising seems to be a good tactics, it leaves all the opponents a bit dumbfounded, but they will be back, with a vengeance.
Anyway, I believe that the renewed positive friendship with Russia, is really the best thing come out of the first week or so.
This is truly historic, the end of the cold war. Well done mr. Trump.
It was prepared by mr. Obama in his first term, and concluded with you now. That is really good.
In order to capture the moment, and truly go through with it, there is however a diplomatic dance to be done at the “borders” of the cold war. Still the alliances there are very vivid and you and mr. Putin will have to deliver on the peace.
Show the Baltics that you are honest about the peace, make a good deal with Ukraine. There are other places that are still affected, ask your diplomats to find a good solution to these border disputes.
If you and mr. Putin succeeds with that, you can address your other allies and show that they should not be worried about it, and then start focusing on the real threat; Islamism.
You had a good conversation with ms. May as well, well done. She is a vital ally. The UK needs all the support it can get in this difficult situation. I am thinking a lot about it, and planning a trip to Oxford that may help the Brits.
In the Middle East, the push back on the Muslim Brotherhood is a REALLY good move. I agree with that, I have done it myself.
This opens up a potential alliance with Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Because the Muslim Brotherhood is in opposition to these two states.
There are, however, a lot of consideration in these strategical alliances.
First of all, Saudi Arabia is an ally of Israel. And that is very good, this is the same with Egypt. Alienating them, will be really bad for Israel. At the other side, Saudi Arabia is rumoured to sponsor some terror activity. This I honestly do not know.
I think Saudi Arabia is a possible ally, and they are moving in a very positive direction. But the secret service has to be in on this, to make sure.
Israel, well thank you very much, we are absolutely in line with each other here. Mr. Netanyahu is a Churchillian as yourself. You can trust him. Make him a friend.
Concerning the European States in general, I would wait a little to make serious commitments. There are a lot of elections coming up, and the EU is really falling apart. Be nice, but see where the trends are leaving you, before you make any serious action.
Except for France. I really believe that they are on our side, the pro democratic fight is at the heart of all Frenchmen, right or left.
BUT Denmark and Norway should be completely ignored until they leave their pro islamist stance. Now added with Denmark a antisemitic stance. Disgusting.
“Make no show of cowardice then on your part, seeing the greatness of the issues at stake, and I will show that what I preach to others I can practice myself”
Brasidas, Spartan leader in the Pelleponesian war.
There seems to be some synergy going on in the international sphere of politics. A lot of the ideas that I have had, do correspond very much with the ideas of mr. Trump.
Probably because that I have been so dominant in political development, so things combine.
This is truly a great opportunity for mr. Trump to work with European allies and Russia.
There will be no difficulty in cooperating with mr. Wilder or ms. Le Pen. Add to this a great many common interests with the current U.K. administration. In fact the common enemies and the common ideological basis really make an alliance logical and easy.
We fight for democracy against radical islam or rather political islam.
These strategic and ideological paths are now so well trod, that even the most negative politician will see it as politically admissible to counter the threat of islamism.
I do however really support mr. Cain in his criticism of use of torture. It may be opportune, but we need to fight with honor to win. As soon, as we lose our honor we also lose the moral glue that binds the alliance together.
The higher your honor is on a battlefield, the better your league will work. It is seen numerous times, especially in the Pelleponesian war, where a certain Spartan captain Brasidas fought with so much honor, that he even turned to enemies to his cause.
It is truly difficult to be honest about things. One of the worst things that the world often faces, is the persecution of Jews. We Jews are not to be blamed for what people often think of as vile deeds. Antisemitism come in all shapes and forms. From the most base, to an advanced one in Nazism.
My great grandmother had to flee in what was the purge of Jews in Denmark seventy years ago. She did make it, because she was resilient and had help.
But today this story is slowly fading away in the consciousness of the Danes. We think of it as in another time, a story that has nothing to tell us today.
But is that really true?
A year and half ago a young islamist attacked my Vilks comitee with a loaded machinegun. He simply shot in through the windows of the place, where we were meeting.
Then he was gone, after killing a filmmaker, in cold blood.
The police obviously did not know much about him, so he had time to plan another black deed.
What he did, was to go to the Jewish synagogue. There he drew his gun again and killed the Jewish guard in cold blood.
A manhunt started, and he was shot down by the special police.
Now, what does that case tell us?
First of all, it tells us, that the islamists obviously connect the liberal cause with prosemitism. First he went to my comitee, killed one person, then, he killed a Jew.
This is obvious.
Then after the onslaught, there was this public uproar, and people started marching, singing “Imagine” and what not.
The prime minister held emotional speeches and everybody was appalled.
Nevertheless, you see, things fade in memory, and now, after one and half year the worms start creeping out of the woodwork. Because he had a friends the young islamist. He had friends, and now they see it fit to begin working.
Who are they?
Well, I would never have believed it possible, but it is firstly the system of judges. Now they are really interested in the memory of the assailant. They feel that his family must have feelings also, and we therefor have to protect these feelings.
Did anyone say twisted moral compass? So what do they do? As a direct insult to the Jew that was slaughtered in cold blood, they attack the former head of the Mosiac faith, conjuring some bogus complaint.
Talk about a kangaroo court.
What is really disheartening though, is the LACK of reaction from …. everybody.
No one cares, no one raises an eyebrow. It is just “business as usual”. This is when I am truly alarmed. Because here, seventy years after the Holocaust, what was the main problem with the purge of Jewry on the East front.
It was the silence of the German people. No one really cared. Oh yes there were rumors, but who cared? Probably just rumors, and if the press does not report on it, it is probably just wrong.
The truly scary thing about the Nazis, was the compliance of the German people.
Does this ring a bell with the states accusations on Finn Rudaizky?
No one seems to care.
That is where the true antisemitism is showing its ugly head. With carelessness.
G-d bless the victims of the Holocaust, and may we never forget.
This post only represents my views on the issue and is not the official stance of the Vilks comitee.
The antisemitism is slowly rearing its head again in Europe. Seventy years after the last round.
These ideas are totally wrong. I mean, we Jews are not perfect. We are a warring, intelligent, money hoarding, soft hearted very religious people that have the dubious honour to have founded all religions. Mostly.
This has led to the fate, that people either love us, or hate us. Loves us when they themselves are close to their own positive roots, hating us, when they are corrupt. Corruption and Jewhate almost always stick together.
So, where are those trends?
First and foremost, we see them in the effect that the 68´ths has had on the states. 68´ths had an open allegiance to the PLO and his ilk of traitors and con men.
They “fought” Israel by propaganda and subterfuge. When the hapless europeans came to Gaza, they met those who they thought was friends, but truly it was just Potemptkin setups.
These idiots have merged with the states. So now they are using the many heads of state to persecute Jews that stand up for Jewish rights and rightful place in the society. Me, among others.
There has just been a case in Denmark, where the state prosecutor unmotivatedly sued Finn Rudaizky, former head of the Mosaic believers because he had helped the press by releasing evidence about the terror attack last year where a Jew was shot. The city council of Copenhagen is openly antisemitic, and pro IS. So they accept IS fighters roaming around. One of them did the terror attack on my Vilks committee, and he at the same time did an attack on the Jewish synagogue.
So what is the reaction of the state? They end up prosecuting Finn Rudaizky and I think at the same time vandalised my boat.
That is a problem for Jews in Europe, because if that is how the state sees Jews, we are, in reality, sitting ducks. Just waiting for the islamist to step on to our door and kill us. The state will let the islamist be free to do their dirty jobs.
Disgusting alliance.
Then there is another problem that is in Germany. It is relatively new, and I do not know much about it. However, it seems that the Afd are relatively antisemitic. That is a problem, and they should denounce that.
G-d bless the will to be strong in the face of persecution.
Note: This is not the official stance of the Vilks committee (I am a member of the board of directors)
Ok, so now we are talking migration, whatever the political stance, everybody agrees that something has to be done about it. In Europe, in the US.
But what do we do?
As a Democrat in the US, I think what we need to do, is to insist on a human process. It should be done with care for each individual migrant. I believe, that the criminals, the vagabonds and especially the ones that do not adhere to American laws and ideas are not suited for the U.S.
There is a social burden there to consider. Some of these people come from poverty. But the U.S. cannot lift the entire globe out of misery. There is a limitation.
On the other hand, we need to protect American citizens who are, rightfully angered at the lax security measures. American moms who lose their sons or daughters to drugs or a drug related crime, are victims as well. In fact, we need to worry about them as much. In fact, more, they are our citizens.
That is the lay of the land.
Now, we still need to dig a little deeper into the entire problem. Because why is it that Americans are so open to migrants? Because the U.S. is built on migrants, and, especially in the beginning of migrants from Western Europe. People who were poor and often persecuted because of their faith. Be it Mormon or Quacker.
This idea of the U.S., as the haven for the persecuted is a beautiful idea, an idea I can truly relate to, being persecuted myself in Europe by a tyrannical state.
Thank you U.S.! You have done a lot for my predecessors, we owe you, as we owe you now for taking my side on the conflict.
It is as old as the U.S. Older in fact, the difference being, that before the U.S. was started we rebels of Europe usually either won or died. We had no place else to go.
So there is a dilemma there I think.
What you could do, and should do, is to be honest about the migrants you want. You were built upon European migration, and honestly, this is what you want to continue doing. Some may fool themselves and say it is otherwise, but that would be lying to yourselves.
This is what is wrong with Muslim migration and Mexican migration. They are not North Europeans.
If you are able to be honest with yourself on this issue, the process is pretty straight forward. Stop migration from the south. Repatriate the Mexicans who are criminal and educate the rest.
That is it.
You just need to be honest with yourself. And let the administration do their work.
The core of democratic philosophy is about finding freedom. The idea is, that if you tie yourself to the law, and make those laws yourself, that is, the people make them. Then you are free.
This is it. The tradition harks all the way back to Greece where Athens was the democratic ideal. But it also has a more folkish root in the old viking societies called “Freestates”.
French and American democratic unions are a mix of these two. The philosophers are talking about all the greek things. The people remembering the freestates as their ideal. Making a practical mix for all to understand and use.
The opposite of freedom is tyranny. But what is tyranny really? I have given that discussion quite a bit of thought. Both because we have tyranny at hand called islamism, that is a caliphate and an added law state called Sharia. And because I have lived under one of those tyrannies for the last ten years, trying to quell my voice.
As Hammurabi says in his first definition of law as such. Law is the protection of the weak against the strong.
What is it that it is meant to protect? It is meant to protect the life and virtues of each citizen. In a democracy, the first virtue being the freedom of each individual. The ability to talk freely on subjects, and the ability to be free from physical threats to ones political views.
In a state that I am living in, that is a de facto police state, because if you say something that the police disagrees with, it will start harassing you, and trying to shut you up. The law has lost its meaning.
It was supposed to protect the weak, and protect my freedom. When it is doing the exact opposite, it is no longer a police force, but mercenaries of tyranny.
Add to this a press that works a bit like a choir of ducklings. If one duckling decides that some other duckling are no good, all the other ducklings appear to agree. Making a de facto censorship of writers they disagree with.
Then you get a system that is in name democratic, but in action tyrannical.
It is not islamic in the sense that it gets its justification from G-d, but just bureaucratic in the sense, that the bureaucracy has no qualms about right or wrong, or the source of justification. The continuation of the bureaucracy, and the threats to it, is all justification it needs.
When it, again in practise, allies itself with IS, it has become absolutely corrupt. Taking away the freedom of the intellectuals, supporting a sharia driven law system with endless human pain as the result.
This is what a modern tyranny looks like. A veneer of democracy, with a base in islamic political ideas. A pro forma democracy. Parading with all the supposed virtues of democracy, doing the exact opposite.
This alliance of abomination, of true evil is what we fight.
G-d bless the will to be faithful and honest in the face of democratic destruction.
When I started my career as a philosopher, it was all in a pub called “The Danish pub”.
I remember I laid out my freshly minted ideas for the gawking public of assorted freedom fighters there. Among them a lot of Americans in fact.
It was a “Nicea Gathering” moment. From that point of the entire West seemed to change course. First the signs were pretty small. Danish resistance fighters told their political connections about the novel ideas, and it kind of spread from there.
Then it went on to form the EDL, that kind went global too, the SIOE, it planted roots in Holland, in the UK (especially in England) in the Vatican, in the Anglican church, in France, and most forcefully in the US.
What was the rave?
It was a whole new philosophy, including faith, democracy, islamism, and most importantly of all, it included Jews as a positive force.
So the new nationalists were not anti Jewish, but pro Jewish.
In this way, this whole new package gave the embattled right a new chance. A VERY forceful chance for at revolution.
Then after a lot of persecution by the Danish state, coordinated from the EU, who, falsely saw my ideas as a go on them, mr. Obama kind of picked me up from the gutter, where I, at that point was lying crying my eyes out, after having lost everything.
So coming from being the firebrand of right wing policy becoming the firebrand of liberal policies seemed kind of weird at the time. However, if you look at the content of the ideas, they are as much right wing as left wing, merging the two positions into one.
So this is where we are after mr. Trump has become leader, he is a middle leaning politician, people may not see it as though because of his style, but if you look at the content, he is much more of the Churchillian mold. That is a middle position, but just with new content.
We will see how things evolve, but one thing is sure, I started something pretty significant in the pub ten years ago, and as all other revolutions, it will change the world to some degree.
This time, hopefully into something more harmonious and whole. Something better, something people can believe in. Change.
Well, there are several issues we have to take into consideration regarding the fight against IS.
The world has truly changed due to the changing fortunes of media, so we are a lot more free in applying force around the globe.
We do not need to be too worried about a media backlash.
What we do have to worry about, is how things look on Facebook and Twitter. These are the new medias to consider.
How does that work? It works by rumour spreading. There is always a fire beneath the smoke as they say.
This means, that we, basically have to be honest about the means we apply.
The false stories are gone, but the true stories remain.
This means that we cannot hide anything, but on the other hand, neither can our enemies.
When they do something cruel, the whole world will know the second after. As we have seen in all the terror attacks, where the truth has emerged pretty fast after they were done.
The war playing field has levelled out.
In terms of allies, we are pretty strong. The entire world is behind us. That is not a problem.
What is a problem is what they are willing to do, and how much we may influence them.
The war is moving to Europe and the West in general. We have seen terror attacks in Melbourne, Copenhagen, London, Germany, France.
So, mostly these ancient and often strong states are with us on this.
But the problem is. They are often trying to play a false game.
They send out troops to the Middle East theatre, but when the islamist fighters return to their newly adopted Western country. They treat them as war heroes. Giving them more help than the veterans.
Add to this a witch hunt on pro democratic intellectuals, the balance is often shifted in a pro islamist stance.
The worst countries to do this are Denmark and Norway.
So what do we do?
First of all, we need to push them, and see where they stand after that.
We can start using diplomatic means, to hear them out. Call them out on the problems with persecution of pro democratic intellectuals, call them out on the tacit support of the IS fighters.
If the listen and do something about it, we can slowly integrate them in the strategy that we will have to develop for Europe as such.
If they do not listen, but keep on supporting IS troops and persecute, torture and prod intellectuals that are pro democratic. We will have to turn those states over, and control them. Otherwise they will just be safe havens for IS IN Europe.
G-d bless the willingness to do good, in the face of a relentless adversary.
The world has truly changed. In the old order media, academia and culture had the most power.
This led to a world where the agendas of the liberal camp were dominant.
As the medias have changed due to social media and the Internet in general, these old power structures have changed.
Whereas the liberal camp was dominant in the old structure, it is now more balanced. This is really what is behind all the pain and trouble in the liberal camp. It is a frustration of loss of power.
Come on, instead of whining and being sorry, maybe we could show some resolve and dignity?
If you want to fight, you have to be ready to take the blows that are hurled back at you, with dignity, without resolving to physical confrontation.
Problems are good in the sense, that it forces us to clear the table and start thinking anew.
Crises are vehicles for development.
I think that the extra power we have had since 68 has made us complacent and lazy. Instead of targeting Trump that has done a lot of work, by himself, and honestly miraculously won. We should start looking inwards and start seeing our own faults, and start doing something about it.
We need to develop new ideas and find new solutions to our problems.
The irony of the all, is, I suppose, that the things Barack and I developed has been taken in by mr. Trump.
In that sense, the Obama presidency is a huge success.
Ok, there are somethings we could have done better, but the main ideas live on and will, hopefully, make a better world.
One of the main ideas that mr. Obama and I had a great success with, was dividing the Muslim world into pro democratic and anti democratic.
This legacy is huge. The fight for democracy against tyranny is reenacted once again.
We made that, put strength behind the core objective of democracy.
So instead of being sorry for ourselves, I think we should be proud of what we have achieved and strengthen that core.
In the new world, there are no easy fixes. We have to fight for every inch of political turf. But the good thing is, that Barack and I have made a solid basis to work from.
G-d bless the willingness to be honest and see things as they are.
It is kind of strange, that much of the politics that I have advised mr. Obama to do in the last six years, seem to be the core of mr. Trumps candidacy. That is a fight against IS and a renewed focus on american worker jobs.
In that sense, the next four years at least seem to be a Obama 2.0, just with a lot more force to the politics.
Even some of the ideas that Obama was kind of forced to go away from is taken up again by mr. Trump. The renewed friendship with Russia, the anti EU stance and a pro Israel stance.
That is all good and all, but where does that leave us?
It leaves us at a political revolution, in the sense, that these ideas are truly novel, they are rooted in a deep faith in the ideas of France and the U.S. The first democratic revolution and with that a new foe to bear.
It seems so self-explanatory. Who wouldn’t fight the IS? Well, even though that everybody agrees on it, it still is a Obama policy.
The next natural step will then be to really expand that fight, but here I think you should consider the plans already made, and then find your own way mr. Trump. It is your call.
The plan was to prepare the U.S. for a guerrilawar. If you look at the strategies of IS, what they do is to make a guerilla war. That is, they use the cityscape infrastructure to their advantage.
They hide in the cities, using pinpoint attacks on their adversaries. They are doing that to a great success in Iraq. They are dedicated, intelligent and strategic. Using their resources very wisely.
The armies they are facing are made for European large scale war. That is, meeting on the battlefield, opposing each other in a grand battle. The tank is one of those war machines that do not work that well in a cityscape with snipers.
So we have needed to make new weapons suited for a cityscape fight.
I have talked a lot about drones, that is drones in all sizes, big and small. Why? Because that alleviates the strength of the guerilla tactic. If you send in a swarm of tiny drones (Darpa should be ready with this) into a cityscape held by the jihadis, they are defenseless against it. At the same time only machines are put in harms way, not humans, sparing the lives of soldiers.
This tactics are used with a lot of success by mr. Obama in Afghanistan is however only in its infancy. The drones are big and bulky. They are turning small and smart.
What is really the news of it all is network connected small drones, or rather swarms of drones carrying a small but lethal payload.
These small drones can find the islamists in their lair, and kill them when that happens. It should work.
Actually it was tried by domestic forces in a terror attack in the U.S. with success.
But imagine these things produced on a mass scale. It will be hard to counter. (It should be made available to the infantry as well)
Israel has developed some countermeasures to the tunnel building of the islamists in Gaza. If you have problems with the sappers of IS, ask mr. Netanyahu about it, he will help.
DO NOT divulge this tech to anyone outside the U.S. even Israel. It is not that I do not trust Israel, I do, very much, but this tech is the one that is going to win us the war against IS, so we need to keep it under US control for as long as possible. Also, be very aware of Chinese hackers, they have been siphoning a lot of military secrets in the past. This tech however appears to be out of their reach for now. Nonetheless, be very careful when you use it. One piece of the tech falling into the enemies hands, and they will be able to reverse engineer it.
We will have to discuss tactics in regards to our European allies. I have already touched a little bit on this, but I will be back with more thoughts on this. We however have to be a little tough with them to make them carry their fair share. Some are also directly allied with IS, so we need to push them even harder.
Nevertheless,, to be commander in chief is all about tactics and strategy.
There is already a complicated and highly successful strategy in place that will just have to be continued to bring more success to the US.
When you live your life as a person, as a nation or as a federation, you are often confronted with two options, to choose what is right or to choose what is easy.
Most people, honestly, chose what is easy. They carry on, and save all the trouble for those few individuals who chose to do the right.
What is right is not so difficult to siphon from reality. Look at Europe right now, mass rapes, Tammarush, destruction of ancient nation states, all in the name of what is most easy.
Why did the court on Austria not convict the migrant who raped a mere boy in the swimming pool? Because that was the easy option.
The difficult option would be to realise that the entire migrant hullabaloo was a catastrophe. That would be difficult, because then you would actually have to do something about it.
The easy solution is for the many, the right for the few.
What do we do about that? Well, people who are scared they elect the ones who have the moral fibre to be right. That is why they chose mr. Winston Churchill right? He had the strength to be right. That is why mr. Johnson is now heading for a prime position in the U.K. because he had the moral fibre to be right, and do what was necessary albeit the cost in a terrible situation.
Mr. Trump also has the potential to be a truth bringer and an honest leader. He has.
My own country has not elected anyone who are to do things right. But keep looking away, as they keep molesting me and my family. So deep into corruption, that they have lost all sight of right and wrong, and just carries on. Let all the rapes continue, as long as we are not bothered, appears to be the saying of the day.
As in Sodom and Gomorrah, where only one man tried to do what was right, and was attacked by all others.
Each and every day, we face that difficult question, to take the hard road, but then do what is right, or to do what is the most easy.
NAME: Asger Trier Engberg
IBAN: LT 9132 5004 1618 3489 51
SWIFT/BIC: REVOLT21
BANK ADRESS: Revolut Bank UAB, Konstitucijos ave. 21B, 08130, Vilnius, Lithuania
.........................................................................
Books
Titan
The development of Denmark has reached the shores of California, the epithets of Chicago, the halls of Oxford, but the true wisdom of Denmark were made and formulated on blogs. This book will give you an insight into the basic philosophical principles that were discussed after the Mohammed crisis. It is provocative, acidy, monumental and easy to read. (In danish)
Mod visdom og retfærdighed
According to Platon three virtues were most important to the leader of anything; courage, wisdom and justice. But how do we define these virtues today? This book will give you an insight into the virtues reflected in the wisdom of some of the most succesful leaders of modern Denmark. (In danish)
Read more
.........................................................................
Den gode leder
Business in philosophy, or philosophy in business? We march down the straits of Aristotle and Løgstrup, to reach port in the sense of meaning in business. This book will give you an idea of why and how you do business, based on the most profound philosophy of ancient and modern time. (In danish)
