​In Europe, many people are disheartened by the development of the states and the societies in general. It is all going the wrong way. 

So what do we do?

Let me give you an example of my own life. I have just had a little daughter, the second in fact. Rakel and Esther, two Jewish names. 

Having your second kid is the second test of your marriage. There is a lot pressure on your relationship to your spouse. 

This often ends up in small annoyances and a bit of strife. We try to be nice, but when you have not slept for five weeks, more or less, you tend to get a little thin-skinned. 

But there is a thing. I truly love my wife. Beyond all the screaming, trouble, and sore eyes. I still hold a deep and everlasting love for my beautiful wife. 

This is what keeps us going, that is the sustenance and gasoline of our little family. 

Because when I really think of her, she reminds me of all that I truly love in her. All her good things. Love propels us to think about the good of where we are. 

If we zoom out a little. I have the same feeling with my town, and my country. 

Few people appreciate Denmark these days. People do not see Denmark for what it is. They do not love their country anymore. But I do, I love Denmark. I love it for its honesty, its beautiful little cities, its coastline, its traditions. 

There are so many things I love about Denmark. 

The same goes for people in France, England, Germany and all other countries of Europe. 

The redeemer is the love you hold for your country. Because that will teach you about the qualities of your own country, and we need that in this crisis situation. 

Redemption rests on love.

G-d bless the will to strong in emotions and loyalty.

The Middle East peace process still needs the footprint of Mr. Kushner. Let me be absolutely honest about the prospects of a role to bee played by Mr. Kushner in the Middle East now. 

Either you move with me, or you will be eaten by all the sharks that are in the waters. Not having moved yet, is a bad sign, and this will diminish the possible impact that a new player has. 

I have promised Mr. Trump to guide him, and as a central adviser, the downfall of Kushner is bad news for Mr. Trump. 

I can wait another day or two, but from there on, I need to move on the different projects and processes I have been working on the last six years. I will not let the peace process be lost. The Middle East should have a comeback internationally and spiritually. It is the hub of religion, and as such it should develop and strengthen religion. It should be the vanguard of G-d.

I am here, just write me an email. I may seem like a nerd here on the blog, and honestly there is a bit of truth to that. I use way too much time in front of my computer. But I am also a honest Jew, and in that capacity, I believe we will get on just fine. And inbtw, very few international players get an invite like that. 

Just a last thing Donald. Call Mr. Putin. This no one can take that away from you, and not doing it makes you look too much as a tool for Pentagon and so on. 

But a serious call, with a rapport will do you a lot of good. 

G-d bless the peace we will find.

​OK, the first hundred days of Mr. Trumps president ship is nearing its conclusion. 

I think we can handily conclude, that we, the Democrats are basically still very much in the game. 

The things we do not agree with, are not going through congress, but at the points we do agree, things are going forward. 

The only exception being foreign policy, but even here, my voice has been heard. 

Looking ahead, this is probably how things will evolve. There is however, a single extreme danger for the whole party we need to realise. Look at France, and at UK. In both these countries the liberal part has been all but eviscerated. 

In fact that was why we lost the election in the US, because, although ms. Clinton did adopt most of my policies, she still lost because she was too much of the old guard.

This is not to further my own case. I have plenty of things going for me alone, but to make us realise that the danger is far from over. 

We need to keep developing the liberal perspective in the US, with new innovative and modern approaches. 

This work lies ahead of us, and there is plenty of time to do it, but we should not just leave it to me and chance, we need to start work. Organise, discuss, think to keep the motion going. 

G-d bless the will to be innovative in a difficult situation.

​Well, after some kind of guard change, we have come to this. Some of the policies that Barack and I have implemented, most notably the attempt to finish the cold war, has remained in the new administrations view. 

The fight against ISIS is also still on, and the fight against China has taken a strange but not altogether bad turn. 

There are some things in the Middle East that is going my way. To accept Egypt again and kick out the Muslim Brotherhood is good, but the overall peace efforts in the Middle East seem to rest on my shoulders now. 

Concerning Europe, things have moved forward, but still it remains to see what the downfall of EU and the rise of IS in Europe will result in. Not a good thing I believe. 

But all in all, I think that the transition phase is at its completion. We still need to see how Mr. Jared Kushner will play his game. That is really all that remains. 

G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in the face of strife.

​I am reading an interesting philosophical treaties by Plato. You know the Athenian who roamed the world 2500 years ago. 

In this specific treaties, he discusses the development of a nation or a polis. The sophist of his discourse claims, that it is possible to teach virtue, and by doing that, create the basis of the nation. 

The point is, that, as Heraclitus says, the law is not an external thing, it is an internal thing. The nation only works, if the citizens are all on a certain level in regards to virtue. 

Yes we do have the police and justice system to punish those who are not virtuous, and breaks the rules. But these measures are only secondary, it is for the exception. A nation should have most of its citizens to follow the law. 

This point, though coming from a sophist, that is a person usually not liked in platonic dialogues, seems right to me. And it points to some of the problems that we meet in the West these days. 

The policy of open borders has the consequence, that we mix people of different backgrounds with very different ideas when it comes to virtue. 

In most cases this can, by teaching be solved, but in some cases the opposite effect is seen. As in the case with all the rapists of the migrants. Obviously, this is unvirtous. This is wrong, and they do it because they are, basically, bad men. 

The problem in our public discourse however, is that in most liberal definitions, migrants, or refugees are virtuous when they come. They are seen as poor, good people, fleeing a devastating war. 

This is often the case, but sometimes the opposite is the fact. They are not poor, but bad men, IS fighters, hiding in the refugee stream. Rapists and so on. 

This clash of understanding virtue is where we are truly divided, some people see all refugees as good, some see all refugees as evil. 

The truth however is in between. There are some good, and some bad. What we need to do, is to be able to make a division. Not be naive in this situation, and take care that the bad men do not get into our countries, but the good men are helped. 

That is difficult, but any politicians with any kind of ambition in the West, should master this process. 

G-d bless the will to be honest and humane in a difficult situation.

Congratulations Mr. Macron and Ms. Le Pen. Both did a good job of getting to the second round of the French election. First of all, as I founded the movement that Ms. Le Pen is a part of, I am off cause proud of you Marine. Well done. Secondly, what I think France needs is not a firebrand, but a serious political process that leads to a heightened security, and beats the islamist that are in the country. 

This will mean the deconstruction of the EU, but that will come anyway whatever France do. With Marine at the helm, it will be controlled with Macron at the helm it will be total chaos. 

Marine has another thing going for her. She is a good friend of Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin. In a chaotic scenario, these friendship would be good to have for France. Mr. Trump can help with troops, and Mr. Putin can help in the international theatre, where France will play another role with Marine at the helm than what he does now. 

There is only one thing, that I do advise Ms. Le Pen to do, use my economical ideas, as the UK and the US does. It has lead to dramatic increase in the production output of both countries, and it benefits your voters. 

These people are in trouble, they need food on the table. Talk to either Trump or May about it. Or read about it here on Rubicon. I have written about it quite extensively. 

Anyway, good luck both, I support Le Pen, but I recognise the qualities of Mr. Macron as well. 

G-d bless the will of the French.

​OK Mr. Kushner, I have tried to relay you some of the things you need to think about, if you want to work in the Middle East with peace. Again. 

1. Think out of the box, to continue the endless Palestinian talks is a waste of time.

2. Understand the peoples of the Middle East. Here the history is a key.

3. Make your own plan, but do it within the frame of what Israel is already. Your greatest problem is that you are a new, nobody knows you truly. So you need to get your hands dirty. When I started my political career, I did it by going out to the people, and asking them what they had on their mind. It ended me up in a far right group, but they were the ones who cared, and knew things. A kind of pilgrimage in my own country. Maybe that could be an idea for you as well. Talk to people, the settlers, the different political players, the artists, the engineers, the people living under a constant threat of violence, just so that they know you, and vice versa. 

Again, my door is open, you can come here to Aalborg if you wish. Not much of a town, but the happiest town on earth, believe that if you will.

I will try and help you the best that I can. Else, I will, myself, continue the work I have done in the Middle East, and hopefully support whatever process that will lead to the development of each ancient country. 

But most of all, be humble. This part of the planet deserves it, it is one of the cradles of civilisation, and they are very proud of it. If you understand that, and sees them for what they are, you have a chance to do something else. 

Good luck. 

G-d bless the will to be wise and support the well being of Israel.

And Jared, to really live up to examples setup by earlier generations, there is a long way to go, but we need to try. 

Link to a testimony of a Holocaust surviver. 

To understand how you become a true leader of Israel and thereby have a chance to further the goals and the wellbeing of jews, we need to look at the stars of Israel.

First of all of cause Shimon Peres, the greatest star of Israel and one of the founding fathers.

There were others in the beginning, but mr. Peres was there always it seems.

The energy, the dedication, the sacrifice he was ready to make, is unrivalled. And through this immense sacrifice he was able to push a peace agenda at last.

The other star, though, unfortunately to us all so short lived, is Yonatan Netanyahu. He was also a hero, well educated, a true warrior and he paid the largest price for Israel.

What is truly the common denominator between these two? They were both philosophers and warriors.

Through an immense learning, and a will to fight, they lead Israel.

To make peace in the Middle East, you need to reach these lofty heights. Be both a warrior and a scholar.

If you look at an other leaders in history, we see, the philosophical warriors are the best. Alexander the great, raised by Aristotle. Julius Caesar, himself a learned man and a warrior. Marcus Aurelius, Carl the great and me.

The philosopher kings.

These are the leaders, and they are few, but when they appear. They change the course of history.

G-d bless Israel, the land of both learning and proud fighters.

​The Middle East is not an easy place to do politics, especially not if you are from the West. Let us face it. When the Babylonians invented the wheel and writing, we were still living in long houses fighting all the time. 

We smashed the beautiful Middle eastern cultures as the Hittite and the Homeric. 

So we have a certain lack of understanding, that makes it a bit difficult to really grasp what the Middle East is all about. 

We see them as dark, strange creatures that we still have a lot of respect for, I mean the Bible is filled with Middle East culture as Babylon, Egypt and so on. But the current political drama eludes us. 

This makes us act contrary to our own aims of peace and stability. We are just the idiots from the outside that understands nothing and keep destroying and meddling. 

Except for two major persons that really have understood the Middle East on its own terms. Lawrence of Arabia and me. 

What is it that makes us players on the same level as everybody else in the Middle East.

It is an intimate knowledge, and love for Middle Eastern culture. It is the Oxford tradition of digging in the old cultures, Egypt, the Hittites, the Assyrians, the Arab, the Jewish, and use this knowledge to propose peace projects and solutions to the problems faced in the Middle East. 

You see, the Middle East knows that it has been leading, and is not anymore. As China, that has the same role, they seek a way to find a leading role again. 

But contrary to China, the Middle East is not as aggressive and dominating. When we have criticised the plans of the Muslim Brotherhood for world domination, most great players of the Middle East as Egypt and Saudiarabia have chosen our side. 

So there is a possibility to work and develop the Middle East in a constructive way. As we are doing with Egypt now, and we can do with all the other ancient countries. 

Here is a role to play for Oxford, in fact it is vital that the Oxfordian tradition of learning and understanding is kept alive and has a role to play. Here again is an exiting role for the UK to play. 

G-d bless the will to be right with the Middle East.

​These beginnings of presidentships are really difficult, so much to convey and so much at stake. I do not prescribe anything, but I do try to make the shift from one presidentship as smooth as possible. 

Now, there are basically two guys that are interested in the international politics in the Trump administration, as far as I can surmise from the outside. 

Mr. Kushner and Mr. Bannon. After doing a little research on Kushner and knowing where Mr. Bannon comes from. These are my advise. 

First of all, it is about the complexity of the operation. Barack and I made most of the decisions between the two of us. That was both good and bad. Good because it made a lot of consistency, and allowed us a very complicated and successful strategy that has spanned decades, and is still the basis we are working with. Bad in the sense, that it has been, mostly, unknown outside a very, very limited group of top brass. 

This gave me a lot of problems when Kerry took over. He tried to do the usual Clintonesque Israel Palestine peace process, and failed. Because he did not understand what Barack and I had been up to. 

If Mr. Kushner wish to avoid the mistake Mr. Kerry did, please I am here, just call me, contact me, anything, I will help. 

It seems to me, that the two advisers are not that happy with each other. This is probably due to different views. I believe though, that these differences can be overcome, if both parties study the lay of the land a little more. 

The fight against ISIS is linked to the peace process of the Middle East. In fact I started all the focus on ISIS with the help of Mr. Netanyahu. The point is, there are some bad guys in the Middle East, and they are ISIS. In order to make peace with all the other parties, we just need to line up in this fight. A common enemy creates a bond. 

Honesty, I am a little surprised to say that I actually like both Mr. Kushner and Mr. Bannon. Both leading characters in their field. Mr. Bannon a hardcore conservative liberalist of the anti Islamist lately anti Muslim mould. In fact, I disagree with the view that all muslims are evil, but we came from the same mould of islamcritics. He is a good guy. And Mr. Kushner the best of Judaism, intelligent, honest, religious, gentle but with a fighter inside. 

Good men both. 

I think it is a matter of understanding the strategic choices, and truly listen to Mr. Trump, because he had it right in the first place. 

Good luck guys, I will try to help you the best I can. 

G-d bless the United States of America, may he live for another hundred years.

​Listen, I have given the whole international strategy quite some thought. The funny thing is Donald, when you started out, you had all the right priorities. You pushed NATO, you wanted to be friends with Mr. Putin, you wanted to fight China and ISIS. 

These were also my priorities. Why, because it is pretty obvious that these things are the right things to do. China is a threat, ISIS is a threat. Being friends with Mr. Putin just makes sense. 

I know that there are a lot of people out there that wants to influence you, and truly I see your ability to listen to them as something important and a true quality. 

But you should also listen to yourself. You may not have that much experience with international politics, but you did get the priorities right in the first place. 

Washington D.C. is a though place, especially with all the pressure on you. But you need to hold on to your own ideas of how to do things. Because they are mostly right. 

You know, my feeling is, that when you started all this, you did it partly from interest and partly because you wanted to change something. 

Power is a difficult thing. It corrupts, and sometimes it leads you away from the things you started believing in at the beginning. I happen to think that most of the things you ran on are right, because it is more than just you or all your advisers fighting for your ear. At the end of the day, it is the small man at the bottom rung, who cannot make ends meet, because his job was lost, who I am fighting for. I think, it is the same with you. 

So what I am saying is, believe in your own ideas, they are sound. 

G-d bless the United States of America.

​Well now it has been a few months of Mr. Trumps presidentship. I realise, that I have been quite demanding, and I am sorry, but there is so much at stake, and so little room for error. 

I am not a president, I am not a leader of a country. I am an intellectual, and it is my job to lead and guide the free world, from an intellectual point of view. 

This is my job. 

Contrary to a president, I do not field any warriors or command huge armies. I do not have to seek compromise in the two chambers and I am idealistic, and can do that without any repercussions. 

But at the end of the day, the interest of the US and mine are exactly the same. 

I bleed, I sacrifice, I fight for a better world. 

When Mr. Obama took over from Mr. Bush, the situation was really problematic. The US fought the islamist or the radical Muslims in a very expensive way. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq was extremely expensive. 

Barack and I scaled the costs down, sought and succeeded in making an alliance, and gave the American economy a breather. 

This gave the defence community a chance to think about the priorities. 

Because the basic problem of Mr. Bushes wars were, that it gave China a way to push down the US. Because the wars were paid with money lend from China. 

So it was a problem that the Afghan and Iraqi wars made the US weaker in other end of the globe. 

In practise it meant a lot of money going to the Chinese, and also it gave them a way to expand their territory worldwide. We see it in Africa, and East Asia. 

Now, we changed that, and this gives the US a very good fighting chance. 

The strategy against China is complex. At one hand it is domestic. We seek to rebuild the production base of the US, through cutting off the flow of production going from the US to China and Mexico. At the other hand we build a military presence ind and around China, to curb their aggression. 

This is working, Australia is coming back to us. The Philippines is coming back. The Taiwanese feel supported and so on. In essence we are fighting back in East Asia, to the benefit of our allies and ourselves. 

Two birds with one stone and all profits. Win win. 

This fighting is again more than just a military might of showoff, it is also, and that is really the most important, an economic fight. 

We need to win the economic fight to win the military fight. 

In fact, we should not use military force unless we are truly forced to. 

If we can press back China without lifting a gun, that would be preferable. But we should not be naive, it may come to blows, and if it does, we should ready for it. 

So again, these are my analysis, it is free, it does not cost anything, so I hope you do not see this as Mr. Obama trying to run things from behind. It is not, it is me Asger, trying to save the West and our democratic values. 

G-d bless the will to be strong in the face of strife.

Ok Donald, now your first strike of foreign policy choices have been made. 

To be honest, I am not that impressed with the strategic choices, but I do like the tempo. 

First of all, strategy in business and in warfare hold some of the same components. You worry about your resources, you make a plan that needs to come to fruition, and you worry about the morale of your employees. 

There are many other factors that are not alike, but these basic traits are, more or less, the same. 

The fight against ISIS is so far evolved, that the answers to those question are pretty straightforward, and they have been answered just fine. This war, which is, basically, the most important to you, should really be your first priority. This means focusing on getting NATO up and running with the aim of beating ISIS, helping Al-Sisi, worrying about what is happening in Europe. 

Secondly, there is China. I understand that you somehow made a deal with them in order to contain North Korea. 

This really eludes me. I mean why even accepting the help of China. I can understand it, if you want to make a conventional war. But usually the way Reagan fought Communism, was with the CIA. That is secret ops, regime change and the like. 

Communism usually leaves the people pretty unhappy, so they are open to new ideas. 

If you go with CIA option, you do not need China.

China however is a whole different piece of challenge. 

They are actually pretty happy there, and as a consequence the CIA will be useful, but who knows in this situation. 

They are a much larger threat to US interest, they are stealing the jobs, and they are threatening US allies. 

This challenge is much larger, and should really be mulled over. The war is inevitable, so we better be prepared.

G-d bless the will to think straight in a difficult situation.

Looking at the Middle East now after mr. Barack Obama and I have left it, it might seem a little bewildering what we were up to. 

I mean, we tried to make peace with Iran, we supported the Arab states at the same time, and tried to find peace with mr. Putin as well. 

Most other American strategies have focused, mostly, on the infighting between the so-called palestinians and Israel. 

First of all, what we tried to do, and did with quite some success, was to elevate the conflict from local to regional to global. 

Instead of focusing on the problems between to proxies of Gaza and the West bank, we tried to address the problems of the region at regional level. On one hand we have the Arabs, at the other hand we have the Persians. In the middle we have Israel. 

Locally we tried to make the fight with ISIS a pannational project, we all could fight. This served the further goal of preparing Europe, and ourselves of the menace. 

So it was a kind of killing two birds with one stone idea. 

This actually worked, and we now have a broad coalition behind the fight against ISIS that serves the purpose of preparing Europe for the oncoming fight, and gives us a broad backing behind American lead priorities. 

On top of this, it is a fight FOR democracy, since ISIS is against democracy. 

It even goes further in the sense, that we do not target all muslims but leaves a window open for a peaceful cooperation, something that mr. Al-Sisi tries to help us with. 

This very complex operation is still in service, but it has taken a huge hit in the Syrian debacle. We still have Russia on board on the fight against ISIS, but we should be VERY careful not to lose them. 

Try to think about it, we have Russia behind an American lead operation. That has never happened before. 

In fact Obama and I made a world-wide alliance, for American values that everybody agrees upon. 

If we lose that, American involvement and especially ideological leadership will suffer tremendously. 

So why do no-one understand this?

Because of the complexity of the operation, and because, honestly and here I truly believe that American media has failed, noone cared to ask me to explain the details. 

You have to be really elitist or extremely nerdish when it comes to politics, to understand what is really going on. 

Now we are not perfect, but the results talk for themselves. 

And I truly believe, not at least because I think mr. Obama deserves some credit for it, that the American public has a right to know what we did. 

We should truly celebrate the victory and the strength of the American perspective, instead of criticizing ourselves so much. 

And we did it, while saving money, resources and protecting the soldiers the best we could. 

This is not to say, that we cannot spare lives in the coming conflicts of China and Europe. But we have tried to construct the best possible weaponry for the conflicts, so that as many lives as possible are spared.

So I really think that the American media deserves to let me explain what actually went on. Not at least for the next generation of leadership to be prepared for their action. 

G-d bless the will to act with precision and care for the men at arms.

Well, I know that mr. Trump sees the Middle East as a mess. Well, it has been a mess for the last 5000 years, ever since the first city of Eridu (Eden) was founded, then over all the fightings between the Assyrians and the Egyptians, the Hittitie (Iranians) the Babylonian (Iraqi), Jews, Christian, sea peoples, Muslims, Polytheist, French, English on and on it goes. 

The Middle East has always been at war. 

Bringing peace is a dream that has been harboured there since the beginning of time, an institution as the Messiah has been instituted, just to nourish the dream about peace. 

What Obama and I tried, was much more complex and ambitious than tried ever before, and we did, albeit not perfect, get somewhere. 

Israel has been strengthened, Iran has been strenghtened, Egypt has been strengthened, even Saudi Arabia has found a new more peaceful way. 

Ok there are problems, Syria is a mess, the war in Yemen is a problem. 

But the process of peace was initiated and still is actually going quite well. 

The problem for the Middle East is not that it always fights, it is, that it is caught in the global competition between East and West, Russia and the US. 

This feeds the hostilities, that would, otherwise be less toxic. 

Seen from an international perspective, I think we should see the conflicts for what they are. 

The conflict in Syria is a part of the Arab spring, the idea was to bring Democracy to the Middle East. 

Seeing it from that perspective, I cant see why Assad cannot be a part of the solution. This however wont happen now, after mr. Trump has invested so much in his abdication. 

So the conflict will continue to infest the relationship between the US and Russia.

My best advise is; think about peace, and how NOT to ruin all the treasures of the Middle East. What happened in Palmyra is a crime against humanity, the destruction of ancient mosques as well. 

Do we really want that, or do we, as the heirs to the cradle of civilisation try to lift ourselves and reach a level that our ancestors found?

It will be difficult, but possible, if we search and understand our predecessors and ancestors, their ideas, and build upon them. 

Think for ourselves, not for everybody else. 

G-d bless the peace we will find in the face of another round of atrocities.

I have reflected a little on all the work mr. Obama and I have done in the international theatre of war, and where that leads to you mr. Trump.

First of all, international politics is very difficult, especially in a world where we are not progressing, but trying to stop the downfall. 

It requires a bit of genius to treat this process in order to counter all the threats that there is. But it is possible.

First of all, you need to think about the cause. Fighting, giving your life for something, is not something taken lightly. Our men and women at arms are giving their life for something. That something in the US of A is the constitution, the “We the people”, and that again is democracy. 

You can fly drones over far away lands, and you can act with the skill and tech that we have, but at the end of the day, morale, that is the will to fight, needs a cause. 

So in the first term of mr. Obama´s tenure we fought for democracy in the north african countries. It was called “the Arab spring”. We won the fight, but we lost the peace. 

This is why I think we should think about what comes after, from the beginning. If we want peace in Syria, then what is that peace, and how can we ensure that it follows our ideas as well. 

The good thing about fighting for a cause, is the fact, that you gain natural allies. Of cause France, the second cradle of Democracy was all in on the Arab spring, and after that, they were in on the fight on ISIS. Because the fight against ISIS is actually the natural step after the Arab Spring. ISIS is the enemy that ruined the Arab spring. More or less. I know that we did a poor job of securing the peace, but IS were and are our enemies. 

Now Russia and Syria are actually not against Democracy. Yes they are not perfect, but, all in all, they actually hold elections, believe in human rights, try to secure the wellbeing of all religions and so on. 

So, even though we fight here and there, we are not natural enemies. 

This is the way it is, and most enlightened commentators knows this, so it makes it very difficult to truly fight them. Because you need public support to do so, and you do not have that very much. 

This leaves you with the two enemies that I and Obama have focused on in his second tenure; China and IS. 

If you want progress, use the tools we have created. It is all prepared into the smallest detail, especially in Europe. 

My aim has been to fight IS in Europe, and create a multitude of democracies in Europe after the fall of EU, which is imminent. 

When the EU falls, there is ample opportunity to flex American muscle, and a lot of smaller countries who are in dire need of help against the uprising of the IS in Europe. 

So I promise you success, if you see what strategy is on a political level. It is to make a one to one balance between ideology and struggle. 

Unfurl that banner of Democracy again, keep the light of revolution burning. 

That is what is the basic function of the presidentship, keep the light burning for all Americans to nourish from. 

G-d bless the burning light of Democracy.

To understand what is really happening in the West, please let me take you back to a time when things actually did work. 

A time that is almost forgotten today, but it actually made a lot of the present day administration. 

The time was at the time of the sun king Louis XVI. He inherited a realm where he was the only power supreme, and he used it to build a realm that was, for its time; progressive, inventive, sure of itself, with a loyal citizenry. He was renown for his brilliance, and with that brilliance, he attracted other brilliant minds to work for him. 

In a sense we can say, that the next French generation, the Republicans, owe him a great debt. Because even though Democracy was against the aristocracy, many of the thoughts that ended up in human rights and so on, was initiated in the progressive realm of the sun king. 

If we compare this with today in Europe, we can see that the exact opposite is happening. Our rulers are pretty stupid, there is no progress just a slow decline. 

Let us take a few examples; in order to build a realm the current leadership of the EU imported millions upon millions of migrant workers with very little skill and a mindset absolutely alien to the peoples of Europe. 

Well, if the project was to unite the different european countries into one identity and culture, why make the differences even larger than what they were in the beginning?

That is not what you would call enlightened leadership, in fact it is very close to absolute stupidity, the result is given; chaos. 

There are numerous examples of like decisions that is the opposite of genius, and has led to the chaos we witness now. 

So what can we learn from that comparison? We can learn, that the progress of our predecessors were made by genius. 

The enlightened and supreme leaders of Louis XVL made progress. 

In fact, why is it that Europe has been so succesful in matters of civilisation before the second world war, because we had brilliant minds; Adam Smith, Voltaire, Condorcet, Kierkegaard, Hegel, Kant, Bohr, Maxwell, Newton. 

That is what we can learn from the example, and that is also what we need to do to get out of the misery that we are in right now. 

We need to strive for intellectual betterment, follow those academic stars, that illuminate our sky. 

That is the answer to our misery.

G-d bless the wisdom of our ancestors.

Here after Brexit, the hangover, intellectually, have, more or less, gone, and it is time for a new discussion on what comes next. 

First of all, the networks of business that the UK has access to are huge, so what is really the problem. The Anglosphere is huge, and plenty of people to do business with. 

Secondly there is the discussion on radical Islam. We need to start that. 

Well, and then again, we have already been discussing that for many years, also in academic circles. I know that it is only fringe discussion, and that it has, all in all, been independent intellectuals like me, that have had the balls to do it. 

But that fringe discussion should become mainstream. 

We need to go from having no clue about what we are talking about, to actually look at the differences between our system and that of radical Islam. 

First of all, I believe, that the ENTIRE system is at stake. As stated in the very name of ISIS, that is Islamic state. Radical Islam includes a state. 

This state is in opposition to our state, the democratic state. 

So the basic lines of aggression are in fact not religious but political. 

This implies a lot of legal discussion, and exempts radical Islam from the usual protection granted to religions, since they, primarily see their work not as religious but political. 

The other major point of discussion is that of humanism. We, as Europeans and beyond, belive in the sanctity of the individual. Of the beauty of each creature in the world, and this creatures worth. 

That is not the case of radical Islam, women are raped, we have mass persecution of Christians, throwing gays off of rooftops and so on. 

This is not humane. This is not good, this is a crime against all living. 

This discussion and a much deeper discussion, is something we need to embark on.

This is why Oxford beckoned me, because I have taken that discussion for years, though they have been tabooed. 

Science is about enlightenment, in the face of persecution, cowardy and darkness. Science and the light of democracy will only reach the shores of mankind, if we are strong enough, to lift that beacon of light. 

G-d bless the will to lift the beacon of light, though we are opposed by so much, not least our own lack of courage.

Well, now we have a difficult situation. 

First of all, looking at the long term strategic aims, that is first ISIS then China, not being friends with Putin is a bit of a problem. 

We got beaten by you mr. Trump, and though mr. Putin did help you, maybe, the amount of cheating to get you in the White house is beyond Putin. 

So, we in the Democratic wing should just suck it up, and get on with the necessary work that is rebuilding the Democratic platform. 

We need to learn and revise our strategies. 

This is difficult, and I admit, that we should be careful, but we still need to be clear on our basic objectives. 

The reason why we fight ISIS is not because of some geostrategic goal, but because these bastards kill innocent children, make sexslaves and drive trucks into people. 

The reason we fight China is because they are being pretty expansionist in west and are threatening our allies. 

Mr. Putin can be turned both ways, if we attack him he will go with the Chinese, if we work with him he is our friend. 

If you want action, don´t worry, action will come. In Europe, with China, and we need all hands on deck for that operation to run smoothly. 

I would start helping mr. Mattis in his efforts on making Europe pay more. Because the security situation is really dangerous in Europe, and we should not bear all the expenses for that. 

In the West, we need the same thing to happen; preparation for the coming war. 

War is not something you do willingly. You do it, and you try to get it over with as fast as possible, not to be caught in the quagmire. 

But you do it fast, and you have a clear exit plan.

G-d bless the peace we well find.

Ok Donald, I am sorry, I should have been more focused on international politics. I have focused too much on national politics, but I thought that was important too. 

What would I advice in this situation?

First of all, you had, contrary to everybody in the defense community in the US, actually a good rapport with mr. Putin. 

That was ruined due to the infighting in the defense community with you. 

I hope everybody sees now, that that was a good thing. That you wanted to make peace with mr. Putin. 

Having a friend in Vladimir Putin will give the US two things:

1. Peace at the eastern front.

2. A good ally in the fight against ISIS.

The fact of the matter is, that albeit wrong, mr. Putin has, as yourself, become a kind of scapegoat for all the problems of the West. 

That is factually wrong, and it is not good for the peacekeeping efforts of the world. 

When mr. Medvedev calls out an international war, that is serious. 

Do we really want to do that? Think about it; Europe in flames, nuclear warheads, weapons so powerful that they can destroy countries in a blink of an eye. 

This is what we get if we keep scapegoating mr. Putin. 

I think what I would do, was to follow your first idea, and make friends with mr. Putin. Hinder that war, and use your resources carefully in the true wars; on IS and perhaps of China.

That would be the wisest thing to do, and that would make you a tough man and a good friend. 

Mr. Putin also did pay dearly to support you, as you did pay to support him. 

He is your potential friend, use that in the interest of the US. 

Because then you may just end up making America Great again. 

That is what we are truly aiming at.

G-d bless the wisdom of strategical thinking. G-d bless the peace that is still possible.

The war efforts of the US is not going that well. I think that the US should decide who we are warring. 

Is it China or is it Russia. We cannot fight both enemies. We can try, but we do not have the resources to do it. 

I understand that mr. Trump needs a positive stance within the defense community, and, honestly it has started badly. 

Mr. Trump needs to respect the traditions and ways of CIA, the navy, the infantry, the airforce. 

Because these people are the best America has to offer, hands down. 

On the other hand, we need some cooperation. If our infights leads to strategic decision that hinder the war overall, that is also a problem. 

Mr. Trump has very little understanding on warfare, but he has one huge thing that he can contribute with. He is friends with mr. Putin. 

In a situation where war with China i almost inevitable, that is VERY important. 

The war with Russia is not a given, it is simply the traditions of the military and the prejudices of the public and others that leads to that. 

The war with China is given. As sad as it is, it reminds me of the infighting between Phoenicia and Rome. The war came due to strategic interests not animosity. 

There is another problem. And that is the fact, that a lot of the R and D has been targeted on China and the Islamists. If we really wanted to beat Russia, we should have invested much more in heavy weight equipment. 

The drones swarms that is almost ready, is tailored to meet the threat of ISIS, not Russia.

We are, more or less ready to fight China in a year or two. Which, more or less is the pace the confrontation is building in. 

So mr. Trump, do it like this, at least that is what I would do. 

1. Call mr. Putin. Ask him how he sees it, and try to make amends, and find a way out of this mess. This is your decision, don´t let yourself be discouraged. He is your friend, and he will help you.

2. Try to make amends with the clandestine branch of the defense forces, and make them see China as a problem. They already do, but they need to use more resources on the bastards. 

3. Get ready for the show down in Europe. The drone swarms are made for that, that is an easy win, and will project American power again in a humane way. 

G-d bless the will to be smart on these things. G-d bless America.

There are a lot of talk about gender these days. Mr. Pence, vice president of the US has been hauled into a bit of a mess, discussion on his wife, and their relationship.

Let us see if we can disentangle ourselves from this mess that moderne gender roles have become.

On one side, there is the, often religious claim, that women are evil. So they have to be restricted and put down. This is prevalent in especially judaism, theoretically and islam.

At the other side, there is the moderne feminism that holds the same claim about men, that they are inherently evil.

Both claims are definitely wrong. Man is not inherently evil, but has a choice in life. Maybe some women are more prone to follow their feelings, and maybe some men are more prone to fight physically. However, both parties have a choice. We are born with a free choice to follow either a good or a bad course.

Family, or the unification of man and woman will not work, if we do not affect. The compromise in the daily live of the family is usually ethical. You give something of yourself to the family. Sacrifice yourself for the wellbeing of your children, or your spouse.

All communities only work if you sacrifice yourself to some degree for the common good.

This sacrifice however, should be ethical. That is, we need to think about the principles of the family. What is important. Is equality important? Is respect important? Is trust important?

Family life is ethical life, we strive for something better, together.

Take my own family. It is a mix of different backgrounds, my wife is a devout Christian, I am a devout Jew. She is a socialist. I am a conservative.

But we both agree on the principles of our family. And we have had a lot of problems due to my political life. But we still hold on to our little community, and we sacrifice ourselves.

Right now I sleep only six hours each night, my wife even less. But we see our little children flourish and get stronger. They are happy, so we are happy.

The sacrifice we make, we get it back a thousandfold, because of the happiness our family brings.

This attitude to the family as something above ourselves is where true happiness and equality are possible to realise.

It is also the answer to the crisis of too few children in the West, because when you have a family, then you wish to have more children. That is good.

We need to look at what is good, not what is bad.

G-d bless the happiness of family.

I am totally shocked to hear about the terror attack in st. Petersburg. It is, without doubt, a terrible occurrence, and it is with the utmost humility and support from the Danish people, that I do hold the terrorist responsible for a vile attack on the Russian motherland.

This is wrong, and I do hope mr. Putin will hunt down those terrorist that we believe are a threat to the international community. Not at least mr. Putins country.

G-d bless Mother Russia.

It seems to me, that we have come far in relation to mr. Trump. He is listening, if we let him.

One point I really do think we have to work together with him is economics. He has taken my ideas on production support and put it to good use.

If he does that, then there is an obvious area we can work together here.

Yes, that will give him a success, but if we support him. WE will actually share that success.

What is important however, is to understand what is going on in “Obamanomics”, the support of the production makers in the country.

The three words; made in America.

Therefor, I have added the economic policy ideas to my seminar, so that we, when I hopefully get over the US, can discuss the ideas in depth, and we can use these new good tools to turn the economy around.

G-d bless the United States of America

Link to the new version: Introduction seminar USA v2.

When I initiated my attempt to strengthen European culture, including the US and Russia, it was in a clear understanding that the EU was in decline. 

Now ten years after this analysis has been proved right. The EU has lost all credibility and is now not a positive force in the international development. Rather, all the policies that it has made are ripening with scary consequences, especially the multicultural project has had the opposite effect than intended. 

The idea was to make a paneuropean citizenry that were not loyal to the nation states. Instead all the chaos it has brought has strengthened the nationalistic trends and created a new national identity that of the Umma, the muslim international state. 

The European national state no one seems to care about, unless they are payed. 

In this chaotic situation, what we need is not strife in-between the waning nationstates, but a strengthening where it makes sense. But not in the corrupt EU frame. But rather as a free cooperation between equal partners. We should work on rebuilding the nations in a peaceful cooperation. 

We can have free trade, but we need a positive national identity in each nation. 

At the same time, we need to start warring the Umma, the muslim nation-state that is a competitor to all the individual nation-states of Europe. 

This fight or rather the fight against IS (islamic state) is a paneuropean and democratic fight. 

When my great uncle went to the Faroe islands after millenia of subduement of the Faroe islands by Denmark, he went there with an escuse and a message of peace from the people of Denmark. 

The people of Denmark met the people of the Faroe Islands on an equal footing. 

This is democracy in practise. We call it “mellem folkelig” in Denmark. A mutual respect between equal peoples, equal folk.

The US should still be here as an ideal of a free people in a free state, but other states should be the same. Free peoples in free states. 

G-d bless the freedom of the peoples of Europe.

Ok, I have finished a small seminar to the possible progress of the Democratic party.

First of all, we need to unite, not to be divided.

How do we do that? We do it by strengthening the core of the American Republic, the faith, values, what The Us of A is all about.

We need to start having faith in democracy, family, church, freedom again. Because there is a lot more that unites us than what divides us.

As they say; United we stand, divided we fall.

So the idea with the seminar is to inspire and build a base under these basic virtues of the US.

We philosophers gave you these ideas, we are still here to take care, that they still live and work in these days. These ideas are good and strong. It brings a better state, a better world, not a worse world.

So I pray, that you will take that burning torch that I have tried to make, and pass it on to others.

I have handed it on to my American friend and I hope that he can initiate something.

G-d bless the strength of the US.

Link to the: Seminar Liberal

Well, you have the honour of the presence of the Danish PM these days. Thank you Donald. That was nice of you.

He is not much of a positive person in my book. He sacrificed all that was the initial virtues of his party Venstre on the altar of the EU. Venstre was built as a rebellion against the king, and fought, at the outset to give freedom to the farmers.

He has used most of his life to reverse that process by taking the freedom of the Danish citizens and handing it over to a corrupt supranational structure called the EU.

Talk about a turn around, in the wrong direction.

He still fights on with this, but ok, he is the best we have right now, even though that is not much.

But thank you anyway Donald, it is nice of you to invite him. We truly appreciate this gesture here in Denmark.

G-d bless the renewed and strong relationship between Denmark and the US.

We have to be honest about the build up of islamic state like fighters in Europe. We have had numerous incidents of terror but also findings of weapons caches in mosques.

As Erdogan said; the mosque will be the spearhead and the sword. Well as Hitler, if he says that, he probably means it.

I do not think that Erdogan is a lost cause, but I do think that, with the crisis we have had with him, we should start rebuilding our militaries. Because we may have a lot of humanistic doubt of our courses, but our enemies do not. They are dedicated and fierce.

So instead of using our money on the airforce or navy, we need to invest heavily in the infantry.

They should be grown from the current size to at least ten times more, if not even more. We also need to invest in high tech gear. The drones should be our top priority, but other high tech gear should be invested in. Like small armed vehicles that can enter urban areas and resist small arms as well as RPGs.

Israel has developed a system to go along with our tanks, I think it is called Triumph or something. That will protect our vehicles.

We also need to develop strategies to counter hostage scenarios as in the concert in France.

So, it is time to rebuild our forces, and we need to do it fast.

G-d bless the willingness to build on what we have.

After the attack on Westminster, one thing is clear. This problem will not be solved by more money, multiculturalism, inclusiveness or dialogue. 

As I have said, numerous times, it is a war, and we are not even fighting it. 

To act on this war, we actually have to WANT to fight it. 

This requires a lot of thought, and a lot of planning, but it has to be done. 

First of all, we need to reroute the migrants away from Europe to safe havens that we have created. But it has to be done effectively, not just haphazardly. 

Secondly, we need to start investing in military to counter the threat. It is not just small, isolated groups, this is organized and it requires a lot of support logistically, morally and spiritually, if you can call killing innocents spiritual. 

This is the demon in action, and we need to prepare, otherwise we are just lambs for the slaughterhouse. That is the truth. 

So, as mr. Trump demands. We need to invest in defense capabilities, to defend our own people and land. 

This should be targeted at the growing threat of Islamic State. So we need to prepare for a guerillawar with an opponent that uses horrorlike tools to cower us. 

We need the spirit of mr. Churchill now. That is a will to fight. We need to use the Anglo-Saxon words, the strong words. We need to fight, on the beaches, in the shopping malls, in front of West Minster, we need to have courage and prepare for the worst. 

Because England is under attack.

G-d bless the will to resist and be infinitely brave.

What is Israel really? To understand that, and truly remake the understanding of Israel. We need to reflect on the identity of Israel. 

Israel was initiated as a Social-democratic state. After some time, as Socialism has vaned, Israel is now searching for a way to understand what Israel is today. 

In this work, as a historical philosopher, I propose a look at what our forefathers thought about when they defined Jewish culture. 

One item, or rather core item, of Jewish culture is the angels. 

The angels are ancient spiritual beings, that reflect an ethical stance to the word. 

They reflect judaism at its deepest levels. 

Each angel has specific colours and characteristica. And through the understanding of what the angels represent, we can understand what juadism is, and thereby Israel.

Israel as a state demands more than just a little, it demands the best. 

The best of all, are the angels. 

Gabriel, the angel of strenght, Ophiel, the angel of beauty, Boel the angel of truth, Ravchiel the angel of compassion. 

Each angel reflect the core of what it is to be jewish.With them we can be inspired to understand ourselves.

G-d bless Israel. 

In France the contented ms. Le Pen is in trouble, why? Because the election platform is too narrow. 

To fight islamism is good, to support your country is good. But a ticket to the Elysee has to be a bit broader. 

I belive, that the antisemitic message is out, and now, hopefully, we can see a support of Israel, so I help.

Basically what you need Marine, is an economical plan to go along with the islamcritic message. 

Here I propose the plan that I have developed with mr. Obama, and mr. Trump has used, at least in the beginning of his presidency. 

The direct support to patriotic producers. At the same time free markets should be supported, not with unhealthy ideas, but as a principle. 

Money comes with rich people supporting you. Rich people support those they like. Some even do not support anybody but themselves. But usually they pay back for what they have gotten. 

This is a problem in France. The industry does not fight for a patriotic cause, but are just a globalised as everybody else. 

This should be turned around. Not by negative means, but by help and inspiration. Napoleon installed some good ideas in his first 100 days. One of them the civil code, that is a deep thank you from the republique to those who served. 

The same can be done with the producers that is supporting their country.

By this, you also, directly support some of the workers who have been left by globalisation, having no jobs. 

So it is an economic plan that will support your core voters directly.

G-d bless the beautiful France and may he live for another thousand years. 

I have been given the opportunity to find a remedy for the liberal trouble in the US. With one of my good friends, I will make a small seminar with a powerful message. 

It is my hope, that I will be able to turn the downfall of the Liberals around. 

It is all about one thing; new ideas. 

Barack and I worked a lot on many ideas in his presidency, so we will revisit them, and find the best to propel us forward. 

G-d bless the will to be strong as the world is changing.

Things are starting to move in England. As political correctness is faltering, the debate about the trouble and the failure of multiculturalism is starting. 

About time one should perhaps notice. 

Ideas that are wrong should be criticised, and new ideas should come instead. But at the end of the day, this day of mourning because of the terrible threat of violence should be used for something concrete and specific. 

That being; an open discussion on the issues. 

Not talking about something wont solve it, talking about it may just give you a tool to fix the problem. 

Now the UK will never be the same, but it can be better, in the sense, that a renewed discussion on the true cause of the terrorist attacks can give you answers. And by those answers you can fix the problems you have. 

There is still time, you can fight back. You have the means, all you need is the will. 

Find that, and you will be saved. 

G-d bless England, as you still have friends, and all hope is not lost yet.

France is overrun by extremism; left-wing extremism, right-wing extremism and islamism. 

In this difficult hour, it is time to relive what France is. Is it a weak and sick old man, or is it a beautiful country with traditions of the roman era, of the men of north, the spirit of Isis; Paris. 

Now I truly believe, that it is time for the great warriors of France, the patriots, to rise and bear arms. Not to make a negative mark upon France, but to make a positive mark on France. 

Fight for something beautiful, something that will make this wonderful place live for another thousand years. 

I believe, that the patriots, should shed all the negative influence from Nazism, the Madam Blavatsky ideas, and start to look at the other side. 

At the angel of Michael, the light bringer, to bring light to France again. To see it, to understand it to relive the valiant cry of Roland. 

This is what France is, and what is at stake. 

Good things, things of value, things that will have to be used to be alive. 

But most important of all. I believe, that there is a great, great idea that must now be fought for, that we must rise up for. That idea of the Republic, that idea of Democracy, threatened by barbarism and islamism. 

Only if the great sons and daughters rise to the occasion, and shout! At the top of their lungs for France, will we see her for another day. 

G-d bless the beautiful France, and may we live to see her again. Par Isis, Paris.

In the current conflict between migrants and Europeans, we have two choices, or rather, I suppose we mostly have already chosen. 

We can either chose to confront this conflict as an ethnic conflict or as a political conflict. 

In Sweden the current environment, which is absolutely devastating, the conflict will, most probably, be ethnic. As in Yugoslavia, Swedes will band together with Swedes and other ethnic groups likewise. 

There might be a religious superstructure to the migrants to chose from, that is an islamic identity and rule. But we will see. 

The effect of this development will be like Yugoslavia, some areas will end up muslim, other areas will end up Serbian or the like. 

If we, however, chose to see the conflict as a political conflict, that is a fight between democracy and islamism, the development will be qualitatively different. 

The ethnic element will still be there, because democracy is a traditional value for most Europeans, but many migrants will be given a way to find loyalty to their new countries. 

This also gives the current states an opportunity to survive. If the migrant crisis explodes into ethnic violence, the states will not survive, but new states will appear as a result of the turmoil. 

The philosophical and ideological strength that follows in the footsteps of a revolution, that is a democratic revolution, within the frames of the current system, will make the tackling of the problems much more civilised, and thereby much less violent. 

That is my plan, and has been all the time. That is why I have founded the democratic, republic wave that rides over Europe these days. Because it will be the wisest, and hopefully the least violent. But the air is pregnant with war, let us hope the war will be within some frames of civility, otherwise Europe will really end up in a bloodbath. 

G-d bless the willingness to fight for a positive system.

These days there is a lot of problems politically in the US. The left is trying to undermine the right, and the right really hates the left. Not always, and sometimes it is right, and so on. But the country is split into two warring factions, that do not compromise or try to work together. 

Politics will not work well under such conditions, what we need is to reach across the aisle, try to bury the hatchet and compromise. 

As I see it, both camps have a lot of truth in their stance. On one hand, the liberal part is truly scared about the possibility of a constitutional meltdown. On the other hand the conservative part is truly worried about the possibility of a moral meltdown. 

In fact both parties are right. They see the problems of the other part, and are right in their criticism. I however truly believe that the process of reconciliation is to try to be open to the criticism of the other part, and use that to reflect on our own faults. 

We are all sinners, and it is only if we are humble about our own misgivings, that we can reach a compromise. 

Yes, I do believe, that the southern borders should be fortified and migrants should use the official channels to enter the US. Yes, I do believe, that America should be strong again. Honestly, I have worked tirelessly on this for many years. 

But I also believe in humanity and humbleness, in respect for spirit. In fact, I believe that without humbleness one cannot be strong, because humbleness will give you the ability to reflect on your sins. 

Mr. Trump asked me to guide him, I believe I have stayed true to that. So in this spirit of understanding, we need to unite. Because as mr. Breibart said, E Pluribus Unum, in manifold are we united. 

G-d bless the great Nation of United States of America.

I am hopefully going to the US, maybe on behest of the conservatives or the liberals, but there is one thing that I have really realized the last few days. 

You need to start, or restart your tradition of philosophy in the US. I mean, I will be happy to be a surrogate for some time, but this will only work for some time, untill that I am no more or something unforseen happens. 

The founding fathers were all philosophers, but it seems to me, that the tradition, more or less, stopped with them. Who are the philosophers of today, one may ask. 

A country cannot do without a tradition of brilliant thinkers founded in the greek classical time. We have a function to play for democracy. 

This is really the core of the problem, or why the US has felt lost, because the tradition has died out. 

Perhaps we can rekindle this tradition? It is not easy, it takes a lot of altruistic work of many people to make a frame on which a philosopher of two can emerge. But it is possible. 

In Denmark the tradition has been going on for a thousand years, more or less. So there are a lot of predecessors and illustrious minds to learn from. 

But for a nation to make room for philosophers, a certain prestige should be given the calling. 

It is a very elevated position, and a position that demands the utmost of the person who so desires to be a philosopher. It also demands an extreme ambition, and a solid education, preferably on an elite university. 

In essence it is an aristocratic pursue, so it needs good strong families to both support good universities, and a yearning of learning in the intellectual aristocracy. 

But it can be done, if the universitites and the old families are willing to. 

Maybe even a renegade like me can get the honor, if he works hard enough. 

G-d bless the willingness to be strong in intellectual pursuit.

I truly believe, that I am a good person. I might not be perfect, who are? But I have always tried to look at the world, and do what is good. 

Doing good is somehting philosophers have discussed for millenia. Aristotle claims that good is a final epitomic virtue called happiness. Plato talks about the good, the beautiful and the true is the same. 

I believe that both are right, but there is more to it. For me, I can say, that it is often something about a feeling that I get. 

I remember when I was in Salvador fifteen years ago. I am a dancer, and we ended up there with my dancegroup. 

Salvador is an evil city. When we walked the streets there, we were met by people who wanted to sell small children for sex. There was a lot of violence, darkness hiding in the corners. 

In contrast to this, there was also cultural groups that were good, and a few writers. But the city of sin is not only Rio de Janerio it is as much Salvador da Bahia.

When I worked in IT I made a lot of money, but I ended up leaving the business, because there were so much darkness in the business. The companies cheated the customers. Whole schemes of how to make money on customers, without really giving them anything. 

Now, I am in politics, and there is also a lot of corruption there. Too much it seems sometimes. In Denmark they continously try to shut me down, they call me all kinds of names, and believe that I am “controversial”. When it is controversial to confront the sins of your country, then we are truly in trouble. 

But what is goodness really? Apart from the philosophical discussion, I also, deep in my heart, believe that goodness is a sense. You can feel it, if you are tuned to goodness, if your are tuned to spirit. 

Helping a friend is good, being honest is good, trying to support your family is good, helping your country. 

Bottom line, to be a good person will lead you to a better live, and may save religion. But it will also give you many enemies, especially those who are full of sin. 

G-d bless the wisdom of the ancients. 

Well, I have wanted to go to Oxford again, and it is a bit of a challenge. I got sidestepped because the Americans showed interest, but still I want to go to Oxford.

I have given it a bit of thought. I know, that from the outside I am seen as a bit of a wild creature. I am out here fighting the wildlings waving my wand, sending off spell after spell.

But there is another side of me, that I have not had the opportunity to show the world. That is me as a truly civilised person.

I know that when fight in the wild, it seems all hair, swords and burning wands, but when I am at a school, I am another person.

My own school Vallekilde, that is the equivalent to Oxford in Denmark, was founded by my great-grandfather Ernst Trier. He was the leading intellectual at his time.

Then there has been many leading academics and artists in my family. Like the van Gogh family is the leading artist family in Holland, Trier is the same here in Denmark.

What I am trying to say is, you should definitely not worry that I will misbehave or start doing things at the school. On the contrary, I come there because I like to teach.

I really miss teaching, and besides from Vallekilde there are no other place I would rather like to teach than Oxford.

I feel like drawn to that place somehow, I cant explain it.

But here comes the agenda that I would like to propose, and hopefully we can make it happen.

G-d bless the will to do good, and save the Anglican church.

Link to agenda: Introduction seminar Oxford v2

It is with a great shame, that I see, that the Turkish government are not able to discern between their own government and that of a foreign government. 

If turkish citizens happen to be in the Netherlands or in Germany. Then they are not entitled to any part of the democratic waving of Turkey. 

If they wish to be a part of Turkey, well, they are free to go and live there. Otherwise they are entitled to nothing and should follow the rules of the country that they are guests in. 

Hereby I wholeheartedly support Holland, may you be strong in this difficult time. 

Just remember; YOU ARE NOT ALONE

So,  in my attempt of helping the UK,  the development of my little seminar has so far been,  that the conservatives in the US are interested.  Imagine that.  

I have given a little thought to that,  and honestly I think that that is a good thing.  Ideas are free in the sense,  that I do not own them,  and anybody can use them as they want.  

But to reiterate, my attempt to support the Democratic part of the American political life,  I have made something for you as well. 

It may not seem as much,  but it is the best that I can do at the time.  If you want,  I would be happy to come over,  and try to discuss some of the issues that has been at the center of my work with Mr.  Obama.  Thereby keeping his light alive.  

For me it has always been very important to unite the country and not contribute to a fragmentation.  So I sincerely believe,  or rather it is my ardent hope,  that my work will be a work of continuous reconciliation.  Therefor I am really happy that the conservatives are open as well.  

In practise,  there is a problem about funding.  Currently there is none,  so to make a trip possible,  a small amount of funding needs to be found somewhere.  Just the plane ticket and perhaps a welcoming home somewhere,  that is all that is needed.  

The seminar is attached below,  and you can see,  that I have tried to touch on some of the main issues that has been up in the presidency of Mr.  Obama.  The angle could be changed depending on who will invite me.  I hope it is parts of the political establishment,  and the media including bloggers. 

It is not a competition on who gets me first.  I will be fair,  and I will not prioritize someone over others.  All are truly welcome.  

That said,  if you want to invite me.  Please send a mail,  and I will be happy to respond.  

G-d bless, and may we find a new path in this life,  that will guide us to a better world. 

Link to seminar:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/doj4zct4any55fj/Introduction%20seminar%20USA.pdf?dl=0

There seems to be a lot of discussion and demoralization on the liberal side these days. It is understandable, but it is also a bit embarrasing.

At the end of the day, it seems to me to be a kind of regression. The positions of the 68 are celebrated, and the new ideas Barack and I put forth are kind of closed down.

I understand it, but it is not that efficient when it comes to real live politics.

Around ten years ago, I had this moment of truth in Denmark. It was at my local gym, and there a few migrants were pretty open about their experiences with Danish girls. As they said; over 40 Percent of them had been raped. That being their friends in their local youth club.

You can look at it many ways, but compare this to slavery. When Thoreau fought against slavery, he simply could not see how slaves could be treated like subhumans. North America went to war for that. Because it was wrong. Seen from a humane perspective, the problem is the pain that the slaves suffer in their imprisonment.

So it is the amount of pain that sanctified the civil war of the US. A rape is worse, when a girl is raped, the pain and the suffering will never cease. The trauma is too deep. The enslavement has been internalised, and the person afflicted will never be free and happy again. They can learn to live with it, but their lives have changed forever.

This was what Oriana Fallaci saw when she fought the islamists after she had fought the fascists. The inherent slavementality that is in islamist thinking.

My point is, political progress or development should not be anchored in theories about the world. It should be anchored in the concrete wrongs of the world. What is happening in the world, done by human beings, felt by human beings.

When something is obvious, and has been like that forever, it is hard to change course. But liberation of women is not about getting through the glass ceiling or black womens concieved problems. It is the rapes.

The rapes by a oldfashioned, evil, maledominating, patriarchal, disgusting philosophy that has no reason to be here on earth. And just as the civil war was fought over slavery, this fight againt IS, and yes also the Muslim Brotherhood, is about that same thing. That is inhuman acts.

G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in opposition to defamation of women, and hapy womens liberation day.

I have been working quite a bit on a small seminar.  I have wanted to go to Oxford,  but I have had more luck with the US.  

This being a small seminar,  I will work on a reemergence of faith in the US.  

Faith is the core of a political development,  and it has been no secret,  that the core of my political motivation is to make G-d live again.  

Being used by both sides of the American political spectrum,  I will also come forth with something for the Democrats.  

G-d bless the will to be honest and strong.  

The basic problem of Westerne thought is the downfall of German metaphysics. In the aftermath of the second world war, the intellectuals of Germany were more concerned with peace work, than with building edifices of metaphysical thought. Still there are interesting things happening in Germany, but the tradition of Prussia is almost lost.

Almost, because there is a small vestige of that Kantian wisdom that was spread from Prussia in Denmark. We are kind of all that is left of the halls of metaphysics of Königsberg.

When something is lost, it is possible to rebuild, if you work hard and focused enough. It is possible to keep that amazing school of German thought alive, if we support it.

If we do not, it will die. If we do, there is a possibility to live a life of Göethe, Hegel and Kant again.

I am working quite hard on my metaphysical ideas these days. Finally I have a little energy for that. The persecution has vaned some, and my situation has stabilised to some degree.

This I hope will make it possible for all that understands the need of German/Danish thought to be renewed, to take up that baton, and let it on.

Metaphysics is only dead, if we accept it. If we do not accept it, it will live on.

G-d bless the will to renew German thought.

Ok, it is pretty sad, that I did not succeed in my project that was to make a peace between Democrats and Republicans. I tried, and as mr. Trump said right after he was elected. He needed the guidance of Obama.

Well, I am still here, and I will try my best to soothe the hot tempers and play a constructive role. We need to try to unite, and not be divided.

Politically it is possible, but in the facts of the ground work it is not.

But I will try and remain a staunch proponent of unity.

G-d bless America.

Dirty tricks are, unfortunately a part of politics. Alinsky says it quite openly in his book about politics. If you enter politics, you need to be ready for the punches.

In Europe, it is the same. Persecution, vilification, sometimes even physical threats.

This is why I really admire ms. Hillary Clinton, she is one of the toughest politicians I have ever worked for. Her example is pretty good when it comes to overcoming adversity. She did not win, because mr. Trump is also a pretty good fighter. We must give him that. But she had a good way of getting over all the slander and negative attacks.

One of the worst attacks was just before the first convention, where all the ideas are presented and things start for real. Wikileaks tried to derail the process by publicising some things that ms. Hillary had done wrong. Or I believe it was her secretary.

That is a vile attempt to derail her political process, what she did was admirable, and what convinced me to help her. She fired the person that had done something wrong, and then she just went on fighting.

Turning that attack around must have been a bit of a difficulty. The election process was so tiring.

The same is what happens in France now with ms. le Pen, the EU is trying, with dirty tricks to influence the election. Well, it is equal to what Wikileaks did. It is illegal, but everybody does it, especially if you work with information, and you do not have a direct voice in the election.

But the example of Hillary shows us, that what you do is; fight on. Fight on, and you can actually turn things around.

G-d bless France, and may he live again.

In the current democratic elections, there are specifically two adherents to my prodemocratic philosophy. Mr. Wilders of the Netherland, and ms. le Pen of France.

I support you, and not only do I support you. I wholeheartedly believe that you are the future of Europe.

Remember the idea behind my philosophy is not a negative, it is a positive. You strive for SOMETHING that something being freedom and the republic.

It is much more than a simple fight against the barbarity of the islamists, it is a fight for the philosophical principle of your state.

That being an illuminated democracy. A way for human beings to live in harmony amongst each other. A dream of a nation that is free and just.

G-d bless the will to be honest in the face of the onslaught of both the EU and the political correct. G-d bless, and now FIGHT!

Sweden has wanted to be a humanistic country. With this, I really feel that we have a common understanding.

In Denmark, I am widely vilified, especially by the other humanists. They see me as a rogue.

But as the LEADING humanist, I believe that they are simply too shallow in their understanding of the current conflicts. Like my predecessors Poul Henningsen and Georg Brandes.

It is called the “supreme enlightenment”. Supreme enlightenment must mean that it is elevated above something.

Elevation can only be, if you are somehow better than something else. In fact, I see my humanistic enlightenment philosophy as above the rest. I truly believe, that I have understood the problems that we face better than my fellow humanists.

Where we differ are in two points. First it is in the handling of Islam. Secondly it is in the understanding of nationhood.

Let us consider the first point. I have never targeted ALL of Islam, but the part that has gone full force on the medieval version of Islam. That is; world domination, killing of heathens, rape as a method of warfare, extermination of innocents Yazidis and so on. What we have come to define as islamists, and the entire world, even other muslims are fighting it around the world.

I believe that the world has proved me right.

Secondly. Nationhood is mentioned in the hermetic scriptures that I have read, over and over and over again. Egypt this, Egypt that, Egypt, Egypt, Egypt. Humanism adores the nation of Egypt.

In fact humanism, in its original form, SUPPORTS the nation.

There is an intricate balance in the philosophy of checks and balances that work within a nation. Going Diogenetian and become a citizen of the world does not work with humanism. You have to choose either, and in fact, Diogenes ended up as a slave, because he lost all his money and had nothing to protect him. All humans need a nation.

So far my solution is the MOST humane that I have possibly could figure out. War is terrible, especially a war with an enemy that finds rape as a tool acceptable. So we need to realise, that if and when we fight, atrocities are a part of fighting. The difficult thing in a fight is to keep the professional and humane attitude to the fight, and not engage in mass slaughter and extermination of the opponent.

Therefor my solution has been to repatriate migrants that have entered Europe. This solution keeps the fighting to a minimum, and leaves both parties alive.

G-d bless the will to find humane solutions to difficult problems.

When we talk about enlightenment, we, as I have lectured about, end up in Egypt with the Egyptian sun g-d Ra.

But enlightenment is greater than just the fight between light and darkness. Ra had an opponent, the G-d Apap. Apap that is depicted as a snake is defined by darkness and chaos.

Ra is defined as light and order.

This is a reminder of what light ALSO is. It leads to order. Darkness leads to chaos.

We can see it in very closed organisations as the EU. The EU is made as a closed system, where armies of bureaucrats define the welfare of the citizens.

What is the most obvious state of EU; chaos.

The currency the euro has led to chaos, the open borders policy has led to chaos, the migration policy has led to chaos. In fact, this is what the populace is really so angry about in Europe. That wherever EU takes decision, chaos comes.

The mechanics of this is pretty obvious. When the eurocrats decide something without any serious discussion, the usuals checks and balances that is in a democracy or an aristocracy has been dismantled. Therefor decisions that usually would not be possible to take in an open society is taken, and chaos comes.

So we have a definition on certain principles or mechanical structures that a society needs to have to work. Transparency and order.

Why is it then, that these things are important?

Seen from a metaphysical point of view, I still can’t figure it out. I can see it works like that, but why?

That is a philosophical question of the grand scale.

G-d bless the wisdom of the ancients.

I believe that I am pretty much spot on in regards to the strategies that I have developed for the US.

The Americans are not ready for a prolonged battle on the ground losing too many soldiers. Yes a few here and there, but there is no support for a huge campaign.

There is also a priority when it comes to targets. The targets have to be evil, guntoting islamists to really make sense to the public.

Where American lives however are possible to give is in Europe. As the conflicts are heating up, the fight will eventually end up in Western Europe.

To redirect resources to this fight within NATO makes sense, and the fighting will start perhaps tomorrow or rather at any true given point. We need to be ready for that. Because this fight will be pretty bad.

G-d bless the sacrifices our brave people in the revolutionary wing of the United States of America. May they spread the light of Democracy.