Well mr. trump. Things are moving in the right direction, but it is very difficult.

Blitz politicising seems to be a good tactics, it leaves all the opponents a bit dumbfounded, but they will be back, with a vengeance.

Anyway, I believe that the renewed positive friendship with Russia, is really the best thing come out of the first week or so.

This is truly historic, the end of the cold war. Well done mr. Trump.

It was prepared by mr. Obama in his first term, and concluded with you now. That is really good.

In order to capture the moment, and truly go through with it, there is however a diplomatic dance to be done at the “borders” of the cold war. Still the alliances there are very vivid and you and mr. Putin will have to deliver on the peace.

Show the Baltics that you are honest about the peace, make a good deal with Ukraine. There are other places that are still affected, ask your diplomats to find a good solution to these border disputes.

If you and mr. Putin succeeds with that, you can address your other allies and show that they should not be worried about it, and then start focusing on the real threat; Islamism.

You had a good conversation with ms. May as well, well done. She is a vital ally. The UK needs all the support it can get in this difficult situation. I am thinking a lot about it, and planning a trip to Oxford that may help the Brits.

In the Middle East, the push back on the Muslim Brotherhood is a REALLY good move. I agree with that, I have done it myself.

This opens up a potential alliance with Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Because the Muslim Brotherhood is in opposition to these two states.

There are, however, a lot of consideration in these strategical alliances.

First of all, Saudi Arabia is an ally of Israel. And that is very good, this is the same with Egypt. Alienating them, will be really bad for Israel. At the other side, Saudi Arabia is rumoured to sponsor some terror activity. This I honestly do not know.

I think Saudi Arabia is a possible ally, and they are moving in a very positive direction. But the secret service has to be in on this, to make sure.

Israel, well thank you very much, we are absolutely in line with each other here. Mr. Netanyahu is a Churchillian as yourself. You can trust him. Make him a friend.

Concerning the European States in general, I would wait a little to make serious commitments. There are a lot of elections coming up, and the EU is really falling apart. Be nice, but see where the trends are leaving you, before you make any serious action.

Except for France. I really believe that they are on our side, the pro democratic fight is at the heart of all Frenchmen, right or left.

BUT Denmark and Norway should be completely ignored until they leave their pro islamist stance. Now added with Denmark a antisemitic stance. Disgusting.

G-d bless the willingness to be a serious friend.

“Make no show of cowardice then on your part, seeing the greatness of the issues at stake, and I will show that what I preach to others I can practice myself” 

Brasidas, Spartan leader in the Pelleponesian war.

There seems to be some synergy going on in the international sphere of politics. A lot of the ideas that I have had, do correspond very much with the ideas of mr. Trump.

Probably because that I have been so dominant in political development, so things combine.

This is truly a great opportunity for mr. Trump to work with European allies and Russia.

There will be no difficulty in cooperating with mr. Wilder or ms. Le Pen. Add to this a great many common interests with the current U.K. administration. In fact the common enemies and the common ideological basis really make an alliance logical and easy.

We fight for democracy against radical islam or rather political islam.

These strategic and ideological paths are now so well trod, that even the most negative politician will see it as politically admissible to counter the threat of islamism.

I do however really support mr. Cain in his criticism of use of torture. It may be opportune, but we need to fight with honor to win. As soon, as we lose our honor we also lose the moral glue that binds the alliance together.

The higher your honor is on a battlefield, the better your league will work. It is seen numerous times, especially in the Pelleponesian war, where a certain Spartan captain Brasidas fought with so much honor, that he even turned to enemies to his cause.

Honor is the most important thing in battle.

G-d bless the Western world, and may we rebound.

It is truly difficult to be honest about things. One of the worst things that the world often faces, is the persecution of Jews. We Jews are not to be blamed for what people often think of as vile deeds. Antisemitism come in all shapes and forms. From the most base, to an advanced one in Nazism.

My great grandmother had to flee in what was the purge of Jews in Denmark seventy years ago. She did make it, because she was resilient and had help.

But today this story is slowly fading away in the consciousness of the Danes. We think of it as in another time, a story that has nothing to tell us today.

But is that really true?

A year and half ago a young islamist attacked my Vilks comitee with a loaded machinegun. He simply shot in through the windows of the place, where we were meeting.

Then he was gone, after killing a filmmaker, in cold blood.

The police obviously did not know much about him, so he had time to plan another black deed.

What he did, was to go to the Jewish synagogue. There he drew his gun again and killed the Jewish guard in cold blood.

A manhunt started, and he was shot down by the special police.

Now, what does that case tell us?

First of all, it tells us, that the islamists obviously connect the liberal cause with prosemitism. First he went to my comitee, killed one person, then, he killed a Jew.

This is obvious.

Then after the onslaught, there was this public uproar, and people started marching, singing “Imagine” and what not.

The prime minister held emotional speeches and everybody was appalled.

Nevertheless, you see, things fade in memory, and now, after one and half year the worms start creeping out of the woodwork. Because he had a friends the young islamist. He had friends, and now they see it fit to begin working.

Who are they?

Well, I would never have believed it possible, but it is firstly the system of judges. Now they are really interested in the memory of the assailant. They feel that his family must have feelings also, and we therefor have to protect these feelings.

Did anyone say twisted moral compass? So what do they do? As a direct insult to the Jew that was slaughtered in cold blood, they attack the former head of the Mosiac faith, conjuring some bogus complaint.

Talk about a kangaroo court.

What is really disheartening though, is the LACK of reaction from …. everybody.

No one cares, no one raises an eyebrow. It is just “business as usual”. This is when I am truly alarmed. Because here, seventy years after the Holocaust, what was the main problem with the purge of Jewry on the East front.

It was the silence of the German people. No one really cared. Oh yes there were rumors, but who cared? Probably just rumors, and if the press does not report on it, it is probably just wrong.

The truly scary thing about the Nazis, was the compliance of the German people.

Does this ring a bell with the states accusations on Finn Rudaizky?

No one seems to care.

That is where the true antisemitism is showing its ugly head. With carelessness.

G-d bless the victims of the Holocaust, and may we never forget.

This post only represents my views on the issue and is not the official stance of the Vilks comitee.

The antisemitism is slowly rearing its head again in Europe. Seventy years after the last round.

These ideas are totally wrong. I mean, we Jews are not perfect. We are a warring, intelligent, money hoarding, soft hearted very religious people that have the dubious honour to have founded all religions. Mostly.

This has led to the fate, that people either love us, or hate us. Loves us when they themselves are close to their own positive roots, hating us, when they are corrupt. Corruption and Jewhate almost always stick together.

So, where are those trends?

First and foremost, we see them in the effect that the 68´ths has had on the states. 68´ths had an open allegiance to the PLO and his ilk of traitors and con men.

They “fought” Israel by propaganda and subterfuge. When the hapless europeans came to Gaza, they met those who they thought was friends, but truly it was just Potemptkin setups.

These idiots have merged with the states. So now they are using the many heads of state to persecute Jews that stand up for Jewish rights and rightful place in the society. Me, among others.

There has just been a case in Denmark, where the state prosecutor unmotivatedly sued Finn Rudaizky, former head of the Mosaic believers because he had helped the press by releasing evidence about the terror attack last year where a Jew was shot. The city council of Copenhagen is openly antisemitic, and pro IS. So they accept IS fighters roaming around. One of them did the terror attack on my Vilks committee, and he at the same time did an attack on the Jewish synagogue.

So what is the reaction of the state? They end up prosecuting Finn Rudaizky and I think at the same time vandalised my boat.

That is a problem for Jews in Europe, because if that is how the state sees Jews, we are, in reality, sitting ducks. Just waiting for the islamist to step on to our door and kill us. The state will let the islamist be free to do their dirty jobs.

Disgusting alliance.

Then there is another problem that is in Germany. It is relatively new, and I do not know much about it. However, it seems that the Afd are relatively antisemitic. That is a problem, and they should denounce that.

G-d bless the will to be strong in the face of persecution.

Note: This is not the official stance of the Vilks committee (I am a member of the board of directors)

Ok, so now we are talking migration, whatever the political stance, everybody agrees that something has to be done about it. In Europe, in the US.

But what do we do?

As a Democrat in the US, I think what we need to do, is to insist on a human process. It should be done with care for each individual migrant. I believe, that the criminals, the vagabonds and especially the ones that do not adhere to American laws and ideas are not suited for the U.S.

There is a social burden there to consider. Some of these people come from poverty. But the U.S. cannot lift the entire globe out of misery. There is a limitation.

On the other hand, we need to protect American citizens who are, rightfully angered at the lax security measures. American moms who lose their sons or daughters to drugs or a drug related crime, are victims as well. In fact, we need to worry about them as much. In fact, more, they are our citizens.

That is the lay of the land.

Now, we still need to dig a little deeper into the entire problem. Because why is it that Americans are so open to migrants? Because the U.S. is built on migrants, and, especially in the beginning of migrants from Western Europe. People who were poor and often persecuted because of their faith. Be it Mormon or Quacker.

This idea of the U.S., as the haven for the persecuted is a beautiful idea, an idea I can truly relate to, being persecuted myself in Europe by a tyrannical state.

Thank you U.S.! You have done a lot for my predecessors, we owe you, as we owe you now for taking my side on the conflict.

It is as old as the U.S. Older in fact, the difference being, that before the U.S. was started we rebels of Europe usually either won or died. We had no place else to go.

So there is a dilemma there I think.

What you could do, and should do, is to be honest about the migrants you want. You were built upon European migration, and honestly, this is what you want to continue doing. Some may fool themselves and say it is otherwise, but that would be lying to yourselves.

This is what is wrong with Muslim migration and Mexican migration. They are not North Europeans.

If you are able to be honest with yourself on this issue, the process is pretty straight forward. Stop migration from the south. Repatriate the Mexicans who are criminal and educate the rest.

That is it.

You just need to be honest with yourself. And let the administration do their work.

G-d bless the United States of America.

The core of democratic philosophy is about finding freedom. The idea is, that if you tie yourself to the law, and make those laws yourself, that is, the people make them. Then you are free.

This is it. The tradition harks all the way back to Greece where Athens was the democratic ideal. But it also has a more folkish root in the old viking societies called “Freestates”.

French and American democratic unions are a mix of these two. The philosophers are talking about all the greek things. The people remembering the freestates as their ideal. Making a practical mix for all to understand and use.

The opposite of freedom is tyranny. But what is tyranny really? I have given that discussion quite a bit of thought. Both because we have tyranny at hand called islamism, that is a caliphate and an added law state called Sharia. And because I have lived under one of those tyrannies for the last ten years, trying to quell my voice.

As Hammurabi says in his first definition of law as such. Law is the protection of the weak against the strong.

What is it that it is meant to protect? It is meant to protect the life and virtues of each citizen. In a democracy, the first virtue being the freedom of each individual. The ability to talk freely on subjects, and the ability to be free from physical threats to ones political views.

In a state that I am living in, that is a de facto police state, because if you say something that the police disagrees with, it will start harassing you, and trying to shut you up. The law has lost its meaning.

It was supposed to protect the weak, and protect my freedom. When it is doing the exact opposite, it is no longer a police force, but mercenaries of tyranny.

Add to this a press that works a bit like a choir of ducklings. If one duckling decides that some other duckling are no good, all the other ducklings appear to agree. Making a de facto censorship of writers they disagree with.

Then you get a system that is in name democratic, but in action tyrannical.

It is not islamic in the sense that it gets its justification from G-d, but just bureaucratic in the sense, that the bureaucracy has no qualms about right or wrong, or the source of justification. The continuation of the bureaucracy, and the threats to it, is all justification it needs.

When it, again in practise, allies itself with IS, it has become absolutely corrupt. Taking away the freedom of the intellectuals, supporting a sharia driven law system with endless human pain as the result.

This is what a modern tyranny looks like. A veneer of democracy, with a base in islamic political ideas. A pro forma democracy. Parading with all the supposed virtues of democracy, doing the exact opposite.

This alliance of abomination, of true evil is what we fight.

G-d bless the will to be faithful and honest in the face of democratic destruction.

When I started my career as a philosopher, it was all in a pub called “The Danish pub”.

I remember I laid out my freshly minted ideas for the gawking public of assorted freedom fighters there. Among them a lot of Americans in fact.

It was a “Nicea Gathering” moment. From that point of the entire West seemed to change course. First the signs were pretty small. Danish resistance fighters told their political connections about the novel ideas, and it kind of spread from there.

Then it went on to form the EDL, that kind went global too, the SIOE, it planted roots in Holland, in the UK (especially in England) in the Vatican, in the Anglican church, in France, and most forcefully in the US.

What was the rave?

It was a whole new philosophy, including faith, democracy, islamism, and most importantly of all, it included Jews as a positive force.

So the new nationalists were not anti Jewish, but pro Jewish.

In this way, this whole new package gave the embattled right a new chance. A VERY forceful chance for at revolution.

Then after a lot of persecution by the Danish state, coordinated from the EU, who, falsely saw my ideas as a go on them, mr. Obama kind of picked me up from the gutter, where I, at that point was lying crying my eyes out, after having lost everything.

So coming from being the firebrand of right wing policy becoming the firebrand of liberal policies seemed kind of weird at the time. However, if you look at the content of the ideas, they are as much right wing as left wing, merging the two positions into one.

So this is where we are after mr. Trump has become leader, he is a middle leaning politician, people may not see it as though because of his style, but if you look at the content, he is much more of the Churchillian mold. That is a middle position, but just with new content.

We will see how things evolve, but one thing is sure, I started something pretty significant in the pub ten years ago, and as all other revolutions, it will change the world to some degree.

This time, hopefully into something more harmonious and whole. Something better, something people can believe in. Change.

G-d bless the will of the creator.

Well, there are several issues we have to take into consideration regarding the fight against IS.

The world has truly changed due to the changing fortunes of media, so we are a lot more free in applying force around the globe.

We do not need to be too worried about a media backlash.

What we do have to worry about, is how things look on Facebook and Twitter. These are the new medias to consider.

How does that work? It works by rumour spreading. There is always a fire beneath the smoke as they say.

This means, that we, basically have to be honest about the means we apply.

The false stories are gone, but the true stories remain.

This means that we cannot hide anything, but on the other hand, neither can our enemies.

When they do something cruel, the whole world will know the second after. As we have seen in all the terror attacks, where the truth has emerged pretty fast after they were done.

The war playing field has levelled out.

In terms of allies, we are pretty strong. The entire world is behind us. That is not a problem.

What is a problem is what they are willing to do, and how much we may influence them.

The war is moving to Europe and the West in general. We have seen terror attacks in Melbourne, Copenhagen, London, Germany, France.

So, mostly these ancient and often strong states are with us on this.

But the problem is. They are often trying to play a false game.

They send out troops to the Middle East theatre, but when the islamist fighters return to their newly adopted Western country. They treat them as war heroes. Giving them more help than the veterans.

Add to this a witch hunt on pro democratic intellectuals, the balance is often shifted in a pro islamist stance.

The worst countries to do this are Denmark and Norway.

So what do we do?

First of all, we need to push them, and see where they stand after that.

We can start using diplomatic means, to hear them out. Call them out on the problems with persecution of pro democratic intellectuals, call them out on the tacit support of the IS fighters.

If the listen and do something about it, we can slowly integrate them in the strategy that we will have to develop for Europe as such.

If they do not listen, but keep on supporting IS troops and persecute, torture and prod intellectuals that are pro democratic. We will have to turn those states over, and control them. Otherwise they will just be safe havens for IS IN Europe.

G-d bless the willingness to do good, in the face of a relentless adversary.

The world has truly changed. In the old order media, academia and culture had the most power.

This led to a world where the agendas of the liberal camp were dominant.

As the medias have changed due to social media and the Internet in general, these old power structures have changed.

Whereas the liberal camp was dominant in the old structure, it is now more balanced. This is really what is behind all the pain and trouble in the liberal camp. It is a frustration of loss of power.

Come on, instead of whining and being sorry, maybe we could show some resolve and dignity?

If you want to fight, you have to be ready to take the blows that are hurled back at you, with dignity, without resolving to physical confrontation.

Problems are good in the sense, that it forces us to clear the table and start thinking anew.

Crises are vehicles for development.

I think that the extra power we have had since 68 has made us complacent and lazy. Instead of targeting Trump that has done a lot of work, by himself, and honestly miraculously won. We should start looking inwards and start seeing our own faults, and start doing something about it.

We need to develop new ideas and find new solutions to our problems.

The irony of the all, is, I suppose, that the things Barack and I developed has been taken in by mr. Trump.

In that sense, the Obama presidency is a huge success.

Ok, there are somethings we could have done better, but the main ideas live on and will, hopefully, make a better world.

One of the main ideas that mr. Obama and I had a great success with, was dividing the Muslim world into pro democratic and anti democratic.

This legacy is huge. The fight for democracy against tyranny is reenacted once again.

We made that, put strength behind the core objective of democracy.

So instead of being sorry for ourselves, I think we should be proud of what we have achieved and strengthen that core.

In the new world, there are no easy fixes. We have to fight for every inch of political turf. But the good thing is, that Barack and I have made a solid basis to work from.

G-d bless the willingness to be honest and see things as they are.

It is kind of strange, that much of the politics that I have advised mr. Obama to do in the last six years, seem to be the core of mr. Trumps candidacy. That is a fight against IS and a renewed focus on american worker jobs.

In that sense, the next four years at least seem to be a Obama 2.0, just with a lot more force to the politics.

Even some of the ideas that Obama was kind of forced to go away from is taken up again by mr. Trump. The renewed friendship with Russia, the anti EU stance and a pro Israel stance.

That is all good and all, but where does that leave us?

It leaves us at a political revolution, in the sense, that these ideas are truly novel, they are rooted in a deep faith in the ideas of France and the U.S. The first democratic revolution and with that a new foe to bear.

It seems so self-explanatory. Who wouldn’t fight the IS? Well, even though that everybody agrees on it, it still is a Obama policy.

The next natural step will then be to really expand that fight, but here I think you should consider the plans already made, and then find your own way mr. Trump. It is your call.

The plan was to prepare the U.S. for a guerrilawar. If you look at the strategies of IS, what they do is to make a guerilla war. That is, they use the cityscape infrastructure to their advantage.

They hide in the cities, using pinpoint attacks on their adversaries. They are doing that to a great success in Iraq. They are dedicated, intelligent and strategic. Using their resources very wisely.

The armies they are facing are made for European large scale war. That is, meeting on the battlefield, opposing each other in a grand battle. The tank is one of those war machines that do not work that well in a cityscape with snipers.

So we have needed to make new weapons suited for a cityscape fight.

I have talked a lot about drones, that is drones in all sizes, big and small. Why? Because that alleviates the strength of the guerilla tactic. If you send in a swarm of tiny drones (Darpa should be ready with this) into a cityscape held by the jihadis, they are defenseless against it. At the same time only machines are put in harms way, not humans, sparing the lives of soldiers.

This tactics are used with a lot of success by mr. Obama in Afghanistan is however only in its infancy. The drones are big and bulky. They are turning small and smart.

What is really the news of it all is network connected small drones, or rather swarms of drones carrying a small but lethal payload.

These small drones can find the islamists in their lair, and kill them when that happens. It should work.

Actually it was tried by domestic forces in a terror attack in the U.S. with success.

But imagine these things produced on a mass scale. It will be hard to counter. (It should be made available to the infantry as well)

Israel has developed some countermeasures to the tunnel building of the islamists in Gaza. If you have problems with the sappers of IS, ask mr. Netanyahu about it, he will help.

DO NOT divulge this tech to anyone outside the U.S. even Israel. It is not that I do not trust Israel, I do, very much, but this tech is the one that is going to win us the war against IS, so we need to keep it under US control for as long as possible. Also, be very aware of Chinese hackers, they have been siphoning a lot of military secrets in the past. This tech however appears to be out of their reach for now. Nonetheless, be very careful when you use it. One piece of the tech falling into the enemies hands, and they will be able to reverse engineer it.

We will have to discuss tactics in regards to our European allies. I have already touched a little bit on this, but I will be back with more thoughts on this. We however have to be a little tough with them to make them carry their fair share. Some are also directly allied with IS, so we need to push them even harder.

Nevertheless,, to be commander in chief is all about tactics and strategy.

There is already a complicated and highly successful strategy in place that will just have to be continued to bring more success to the US.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Source: https://www.wired.com/2016/04/darpas-developing-tiny-drones-swarm-motherships/

When you live your life as a person, as a nation or as a federation, you are often confronted with two options, to choose what is right or to choose what is easy.

Most people, honestly, chose what is easy. They carry on, and save all the trouble for those few individuals who chose to do the right.

What is right is not so difficult to siphon from reality. Look at Europe right now, mass rapes, Tammarush, destruction of ancient nation states, all in the name of what is most easy.

Why did the court on Austria not convict the migrant who raped a mere boy in the swimming pool? Because that was the easy option.

The difficult option would be to realise that the entire migrant hullabaloo was a catastrophe. That would be difficult, because then you would actually have to do something about it.

The easy solution is for the many, the right for the few.

What do we do about that? Well, people who are scared they elect the ones who have the moral fibre to be right. That is why they chose mr. Winston Churchill right? He had the strength to be right. That is why mr. Johnson is now heading for a prime position in the U.K. because he had the moral fibre to be right, and do what was necessary albeit the cost in a terrible situation.

Mr. Trump also has the potential to be a truth bringer and an honest leader. He has.

My own country has not elected anyone who are to do things right. But keep looking away, as they keep molesting me and my family. So deep into corruption, that they have lost all sight of right and wrong, and just carries on. Let all the rapes continue, as long as we are not bothered, appears to be the saying of the day.

As in Sodom and Gomorrah, where only one man tried to do what was right, and was attacked by all others.

Each and every day, we face that difficult question, to take the hard road, but then do what is right, or to do what is the most easy.

G-d bless the will to do right.

Now, mr. Trump is heading for the oval office, actually my feeling is, he IS listening. Thank you Donald, this is undeserved, I fought you head to tail in the election and I do not deserve your attention. I pride myself for trying to hold a kind of even heading not slandering. But anyway, I supported Hillary, that is the truth. The truth is also, that I will try to rebuild the Democrats from top to bottom over the next many years. What I am finished with however, is to try and support specific candidates. I did it for Barack because we are friends, and he really needed it, and I did it for Hillary, because I was afraid you would turn into a tyrant.

That is how it is.

But, you are not, so we need to come along, and rebuild the world. You asked for guidance, and you shall have that, because there is something that is larger than us, and that is The nation of the United States. We need to rebuilt it, and make it strong again. On this idea we have been in agreement the whole time. The aim of my work with mr. Obama was exactly that. To make the democratic ideas of the US strong again, to raise the flag, to make another revolution of the US. See the blighting light shining from that beacon, because this is what I am. A true philosopher of the humanistic/democratic faith believing nation.

That is it. No racism, no demeanour, just faith in the fight for freedom against tyranny. As Napoleon, as the first French gendarmes. This is what I believe in, and it so happens, we share this quest.

So this is what we should continue fighting for and strive to apply to all our lives.

Human decency, democratic principles, loving your neighbour as yourself. But with the realisation, that there is evil our there to be fought.

And when fought, then to our utmost ability, and with all the strength that is also us. Uncompromising.

I have thought a bit about the Russian deal, and will follow up on that.

G-d bless the United States of America.

When I first started blogging, I had a long kind of communication with mr. Putin. We so happen to share the same ideas of faith, and we share the fight for a rebirth of religion.

This fight is as vivid in Denmark as it is in Russia. But different in Denmark, because here I am sorely persecuted and held accountable for terrible deeds I have not done. In the name of communism, multiculturalism or whatever it is.

I am not. I fight for G-d, so that we may have faith again. Not that I wish a crusade. I do not. But I wish people to believe in G-d. That is the endgame for me. Nothing more, nothing less. I have devoted my entire career to that end goal, and boy have I paid. My family pays, my economy pays, everything pays, but I do not give up, because I believe that having faith again is what will save Denmark, the world, and mankind in general.

So this is what mr. Putin is trying to do. Rekindle the faith of Russia, making Russia strong and whole again, after many years of non faith.

The Easter Orthodox Church is a beautiful, old and very deep church with the touch of Viking mentality. They are equally strong in the faith as well. Dont forget that.

Russia is called the great bear due to a reason. If left alone, it will sleep in its cave, and not bother anyone, but beware when it is awaked. If it is, it is immensely strong, and it just fights on, and on, and on. As Napoleon realised as Hitler realised. Never attack Russia.

Now, Communism was the philosophical foundation of Russia after the first World War. It brought it good things, but the ethical foundation was not strong enough. And the Russians wanted a more modern and sound system. So they went back to their roots. They still are finding out who they are.

This is where the fascination of Scandinavia comes to play. Because it all started in Ukraine, the first Rus. Viking warriors who came from Sweden and Denmark, settled in a foreign land, and started trading from there.

After a lot of fighting, it has become the land of the Rus, Russia or in Danish; Rusland.

The way to make friends with them, is to treat them as equals. Respect them, and understand them as they are. An ancient Viking nation with a Christian faith on top of it and a vast territory to bear.

Do not turn them into enemies, but understand, that they are also migrants, as the US. They were just the first wave, whereas you were the second. You have many of the same problems and challenges, but essentially you are very much the same.

What I do believe is important though, is to respect the worry of Eastern Europe. They have recently come out of the shadow of the cold war, and they need reassurances. That is very important, that they feel part of the deal as well. So talk to the Poles, the Chechs, the Lithuanian, hear them out. These are your allies.

Please settle for a deal that will leave both parties feel that they got the best of it. However, see it not as a deal for the US, but for Eastern Europe. If you support them, the standing of the US will increase in the world, because the US will be seen as benefactors to their allies. Very important.

Then just be fair, as in all business, fairness is what makes a deal work for the long haul. Customers that come back again and again, are what really makes your business expand.

The same applies to international diplomacy, aim at a deal that will make more countries make deals with you. Be honest, think of the long game and not the short game.

The long game being the expansion of the values you all share.

G-d bless the will to make a good, serious deal.

As Joseph Conrad says, we all share the problem of liking the illusions. To save Europe, we need to come clear on certain things. This is a painful process, but if the democratic nations do not do it, other more sinister powers will do it in their stead.

Enlightenment is the saviour. You cannot be humanistic, if you are not honest.

The fact of the matter is that in Europe, that we have a huge diaspora of malcontents in the large cities. Especially in the west. These malcontents are often sucked up by radical islam, and see it as their mission to uphold some kind on ancient version of Islam.

That is the fact.

The fact is, unfortunately also, that they strive to do it with such horrendous means, that we have almost forgot how these things work. They must have read all the dark pages of the Koran, and settled at a Moses like fight against polytheist. Slaying the infidels.

Well, this is the 21 century, and we are trying to be more civilised and controlled in our behaviour. Such things are not welcome in a modern humane state.

What numbers are we looking at? There is of course different calculation, but unfortunately the numbers are large, and they are getting larger. We are talking about numbers up to 80% of the muslim migrants who seek to empower the sharia law above democratic law.

These people are against the liberal democracy.

What do we do about them?

We need to isolate them, and protect the democratic state against them.

That is the current difficult situation. We are not willing to do that, although that is the endgame. However, terrible it is, this is the task.

This means, that we need to think about borders. Internally in the cities and in around or nation states.

This is not the best cup of tea for the EU, but that is necessary, whether we want it or not.

So we should start doing that. Prepare for a separation of those who truly believe in democracy, and those against.

G-d bless the willingness to be true, even though it hurts.

It is pretty clear that the UK is on a good course. Thank you mr. Trump, you just saved the UK from a depressing situation.

This is huge in its implications. The new international bloq of the former British sovereign nations of Australia, New Zealand and the US is really a huge strengthening of Anglo Saxon power.

This will eventually become the strongest power on earth. It will, naturally, not be an empire, but a looser confederation of equal powers.

We did it! Turned the collapse and destruction of the English empire into a new a bright beginning. Well done mr. Johnson, Oxford compliments you from its deepest recesses.

As things looked bleakest, we did turn the boat and now we are heading for a brighter future. Just imagine the possibilities in areas of commerce, science, culture, the list goes on. The old school opened its deepest gates to unleash a devastating blast of energy to turn the boat around. You did it Boris, as a champion of said school. A modern Harry Potter, just a bit more grown, but still with that much of magic!

G-d bless the United Kingdom and may it live another thousand years.

In Europe, we are really in trouble. What is really wrong with us?

I read a lot of Joseph Conrad. I would call myself a bit of a fanboy of mr. Conrad. His deep insight into human nature, his humanistic yet clearsighted view on things, his metaphysical stance. He is the best writer ever.

He has this bit of wisdom for us. He says in his book Almayers Folly, that we are not so different from the so-called “uncivilised” parts of humanity. This was written 150 years ago, so the terms are not exactly politically correct, but it has a point. Here is the quote:

“Their hearts—like ours—must endure the load of the gifts from Heaven: the curse of facts and the blessing of illusions, the bitterness of our wisdom and the deceptive consolation of our folly.”

His point is, that we as they are wont to accept the mere facts and wisdom, preferring folly and the blessings of illusion.

This is the problem. We have made the illusion, that multiculturalism is good, and that there are not any problems with either mass migration or Islam.

We have to shed these illusions if we are to arm ourselves with ammunition to tackle the problems we have.

We have to realise, that multiculturalism is not a viable creed, and there are problems with Islam.

If we begin there; with the mere facts, we have a chance. In fact, this is really the true mark of civilisation. Do we accept what is true, or do we hide behind the illusions?

Pulling down illusions are a painful task. Illusions are blissful. Only the brave will be able to do that.

Nevertheless, if you do, with a humane heart, as Joseph Conrad, you truly have the ability to surge as a people and as a nation.

That is what the enlighteners are for.

G-d bless the willingness to listen to truth.

Ok, I have lost a great deal of power due to the change of government in the US. I supported ms. Clinton, because I was afraid mr. Trump would destroy the American democratic institutions. So far this is not the case, and so I was wrong.

This leaves those who listen to me some different alternatives. They can stop listening, they can realise that my power has diminished, or they can believe it is the same.

I would just do the second.

This does not mean that the democratic wave of humanistic ideas stops. On the contrary, mr. Trump is actually a firm adherent of my ideas in the sense, that he follows them faithfully. But he wants to do things his own way.

Well, I of course respect that, and that is always the choice of a reader to use the ideas I have or not.

However, we still do have a problematic situation in Europe to deal with, and it will evolve into an all out war in the presidency of mr. Trump. No doubt about that. It will also be a war that is led by IS, so it will be a problem.

For Europe, I would recommend walking along the lines that i have already put out; fighting for democracy in the face of islamism.

The idea was to make a soft landing after the EU falls apart, making a net of parties in Europe that is adamantly democratic and adamantly against islamism. This is, more or less in place in most major countries.

So when things start falling apart each country will be able to carry on in a civilised manner.

It will be a brave new world, I unfortunately do not have much to say over mr. Trump. That is fair, but all the plans he is following, I have made, so in a sense it does not matter much.

My role as an international peace broker, philosopher and strategist is not at its end, but really just beginning. Because now comes both the interesting and difficult part; will it work?

I sure hope so, because a lot is at stake.

G-d bless the freedom and peace we can find in the end.

It is now time to sum up the work of mr. Obama. Has he been such a catastrophe, or has he been a glorious leader?

The answer is, that he has been a thoroughly, industrious and even illustrious leader.

When he inherited the reins from mr. Bush, the US of A was in a dire situation indeed. The scars from the cold war were not healed, and the new foe; islamists were not fought decisively with the strategy that mr. Bush had. It cost a lot of money, and it only stalled the time when the islamists would return to the US and Europe.

This hurt the economy a whole lot, practically making the US dependent on money from China and Saudi Arabia.

That was a situation that was one step from the gutter, seriously.

This is not to criticise mr. Bush, he did show fortitude, and the attack on the Twin Towers came as a surprise, so the US was not prepared.

Now, eight years after, the US is in a completely other situation. The country is back on its feet economically, there are good practises just waiting to be implemented business wise, and the fight with the radical muslims is not under control, but at least it has a focus, and a large coalition behind it.

During the time of mr. Obama, lives were spared in the military with strategies that were cheap in all ways, and this has made it possible for the central administration to gain its feet, and prepare for the endgame; the final fight in Europe and China.

Mr. Trump is making his demands from a position of strength, and not of weakness, not only because he is a strong man, but also because mr. Obama gave him a state in order.

So what is the tally? Did Obama turn the company around for the next manager, or did he fail? Well, simply look at the numbers; excellent prospects for American business, a solid leadership position internationally, and two fights ahead, where one is sure to boost American values, not only in the US, but in the whole world.

What more do you want?

There is one thing that really is a problem however, that I should have been more aware of, and that is all the problems at the border in south. I should have implemented it in my strategies. I did not, I am sorry for that. The reason being, that I am so far away, so it is difficult to really feel what is going on in some areas. I have to be in the US to really feel what is going on.

That is the fault of the previous administration, you should have invited me. As the Brits did when i was invited to Oxford. It gives me an understanding of your way of thinking, and your strategic challenges.

But that could be a new beginning for the next administration perhaps.

G-d bless the United States of America and may he be strong again.

Well, welcome mr. Trump on the world stage. This is it, after a long and arduous campaign, that is finally subsiding.

Things will change with a new president at the helm of the United States of America. For better, mostly. But there are some caveats that you should be aware of.

First of all, some international politics is not like business. It is something entirely different. Mr. George W. Bush had a little tale about international leadership, that he got from watching his own father.

When all the leaders were gathered at a convention, what he and his father did, and also mr. Obama, was that he treated them as friends.

Leadership is about being equal with the other leaders, and then making them work together. Like the famous round table at the court at Camelot. If you treat your friends like equals, then they feel respected, and that they can trust you.

That is the way the US has led the world for many generations of presidents.

Friendship is a personal thing. It is about the things you share, what goals you have, who your enemies are, and you as a person.

This is truly the main difficulty of international leadership; how good are you at meeting your fellow leaders as an equal.

It was the friendship between mr. Obama and mr. Putin for a long time, that was what hindered the escalation of the Ukraine crisis. Neither mr. Putin or mr. Obama wanted the crisis ruining their friendship.

Contrary to the current discussion in the American media and on blogs of different kinds, Obama really did a good job on foreign policy. He pointed the world to towards an enemy that truly is an enemy to American values; the Islamic State. And he made up a huge coalition to fight this inhuman enemy.

A coalition of all those who are truly powerful, even Russia.

This coalition is actually strengthened by the friendship between Russia and the US.

But at the crux of the matter lies the ancient craft of statesmanship that is to lead among equals.

G-d bless the willingness to listen to ones friends.

It makes me happy, that the Trump administration is making progress with mr. Putin. The more we collaborate on a senior level, the better it is for both our systems. Mr. Putin is not a communist. He is a Christian nationalist. Bless him for that.

In that capacity, he will, and should fight against the onslaught of Islamic State fighters that roam the Middle East and primarily Europe.

This is a time to pick sides; are you for or against. Are you against the Islamic state and like-minded organizations? Or are you in collaboration?

Denmark, as one, is truly not fighting the islamists in Denmark or anywhere else for that matter. It, at the same time, fights the freedom fighters of Denmark.

This is a clear example of collaboration. We should put these types of European governments in the basket of deplorables, the Nazi collaborators, and treat them as such.

It is now time to pick sides, which side are you on in this fight, a collaborator of Islamic State or a part of the coalition against.

G-d bless the will to fight evil.

Barack, this had been a looong fight. We did some good things, and we did some things, that did not work that good. But at least, we brought things forward, right?

For me it has been a tremendous honour to participate in some of the things we have been doing together. In fact, being friends with you, is the single most important thing in my life as an intellectual. It gave us a possibility to raise the flag, and fight for another day. For Democracy, for human rights, for freedom.

We will see what it will come to, but one thing i certain, we did it! United States of America is better off now, than it used to.

The legacy that we have built will be one of progress, of doing things better, of improving the outset of the great American nation.

Now comes mr. Trump. And honestly, I like him in the sense, that he may seem like a buffoon, but truly he is not that. He is as American as anyone else. He believes in the founding fathers as well.

Things will be different, but we need to hold on to Hope and Change, otherwise we will lose our faith.

I hope, that we can meet now Barack, now it would be possible perhaps.

But a part from that, well done mr. President. You brought honesty and moral compass to the presidency, that will set a standard for those who come after you.

G-d bless you, and your wonderful family, and I will, for one, truly miss you.

Well the war is drawing closer, and all its allies are gearing up. Yesterday someone vandalised the mast of my little sailing boat. They picked up two of the lines holding the mast, making the mast fall onto some adjacent boats.

The islamists and their allies are packing their gear and readying their weapons.

I am waiting for an official reaction to the crime, if none is given, I think it is high time we put Denmark in the category “pro islamist”.

If they are threatening on this level, and getting away with it, it is pretty clear that we have found out where their loyalty is.

I am trying to pull at some of my connections in my party conservatives, if they do not respond, in two days time we have an apparent first open enemy to the democratic league.

It is regrettable, but that is unfortunately the way things are.

If the secret police try to kill me in the next two days, well then you have an open opportunity to open a flank.

G-d bless the willingness to be honest and strong in the face of oppression.

2017 is about be be one of those pivotal years. The year where the populace finally had enough of bickering and the lack of action in the face of islamist violence.

The pace is picking up now. Attack after attack after attack. In an endless stream, and this is just the beginning.

In a conflict, the two parts will be facing each other to the bitter end. As in the Soviet Union and the US, as the Phoneicians against Rome, as in all major wars where the one side is unbowed when it comes to compromise.

There is no compromise with violent jihadis. Their belief in a holy war is too strong, and they have nothing to lose, nothing.

Importing a vast underclass of unskilled, untrained and poor migrants and then just leaving them alone with no hope to further their situation has led to this, if we want it or not.

The ideals of multiculturalism have become a nightmare.

Even I as a wizard of political solutions cannot solve this in a peaceful manner. It is going down in a gunfight, if we want it or not.

When people bring a gun to a gunfight, dont go there with a pocket calculator as the word go. Be prepared.

This goes for all European states with a huge diaspora of Middle East and Northern African populace.

There is no good news in this chaos, there is only hope in one thing; what we fight FOR.

We do not only fight for the survival of our species in a sense, we fight for the freedom we will regain when this is over. Republicanism, liberty.

The one ingredient in our civilisation we will not let go of.

Let the bells toll, let them tell all the foes of our nations, that we will not relinquish the one thing we hold truly dear; our freedom!

G-d bless the willingness to sacrifice ourselves for the freedom of our world.

Now mr. Trump is moving into the White House. Congratulations. We had a bit of a row, but I am truly happy that you made it. In contrary to many other liberals, I do not see mr. Trump as a problem. He is a warning from workers and other true Americans that we forgot them. We should see him, and treat him as such.

We are, luckily in agreement of most foreign policy matters. Especially on Russia, we agree.

Mr. Putin is not the threat he has been portrayed as, and the Ukraine conflict that was at the heart of the conflict we have now, was done in a pretty democratic manner.

Where we do have a little of differences, is in relation to Iran.

I supported mr. Obama on this, and there is a reason for that.

First of all, it is because of Israel. Mr. Netanyahu and I disagree on Iran, because Netanyahu has a country to protect. I really understand the stance of Netanyahu, but I truly wish to empower the peace efforts of Israel. This is what Israel is; a vehicle for peace.

But there is another reason for supporting an pro Iranian deal. That is, that Iran and Russia are allies.

So if we antagonise Iran, we also antagonise Russia.

Mr. Putin is willing to understand our stance on this, if we get closer as allies. He is no enemy.

But there is a balance of how much he can leave Iran alone, and he is a man of his words, as he proved with Syria.

Mr. Putin does not want to topple the power balance. He could have abused the alienation between the Arab nations and the US much more than he did.

Nonetheless, he is not one for disloyalty either.

We have a huge clash with IS and China coming up. And as I see it, we need to balance the check books on this, so that we end up with sufficient support for these two wars, or potential wars.

This is not my decision to make, but this is the equation as I see it.

Europe is going down in hell, and it will be hard to keep American forces out of Europe. Especially because mr. Putin will be willing to help as well. So there is a certain competition there.

But that scenario will suck up a lot of resources, and will be very dangerous.

My plan, initially, was to bolster the ideological basis of our fight. That is, the glorious fight for Democracy. This is what will happen in Europe, because the Islamists are against exactly that.

If we win, and that we have to. We can setup true humanistic democracies in and around Europe.

In fact, most Europeans will support this fight wholeheartedly, making American troops true liberators. Something we have not seen truly since the second world war.

That will be a good relief for once.

After that comes China, and that will be a different ballgame. Nevertheless, we will see what that will come to.

G-d bless the revolutionaries of America!

If you want to Change a system, you have to align the interest of the constituency, at the same time aligning the interest of the servants of the state.

These two powerful parts of the society are not always in agreement with the direction of the state.

One might want security and welthfare, the other might want boons for themselves.

In such a situation, a conflict arises. The constituency starts doubting the system itself since its demands are not satisfied, and the elected elite are worried about the loss of power.

In this situation, there is only one thing to do. To be honest.

Things cannot change rapidly, but the system itself can rectify its lack of connection by trying to really understand the needs of said people.

Otherwise we end up in a situation where the elite sits in its ivory towers and the people are starving in the streets or fears for its wellbeing.

It is about listening to the worries of mr. and mrs. Smith, the small people, those who have no direct control of the state apparatus.

That is the only and best way to rectify a democratic system in decay.

Instead of doing more of the same, we need to understand the needs of mr. and mrs. Smith.

In the factory, on the street, in charity, in the army, in the daycare, in and around everywhere where they go about their daily business.

WE NEED TO LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE.

G-d bless the willingness of openness in governmental structures.

It has been half a year after the British referendum on EU membership, and it has yet to materialise.

Well, to cite the Queen; what are you waiting for? One thing is to counter all the threats of a divorce from the EU. Another thing is to do it.

There is not pretty or easy way, you just have to do it.

Then what is left? Well, you will find out, that you may not have the most illustrious friends in the world. They may not look hip or wear the right designer jeans. But they are your friends.

What is it really that is important; to look good to the international community, or to live a life that suits you?

When Winston Churchill went against the opinion of the world in the midst of the second world war. He did not do it because it was wise or looked good. He did it, because this was what the british people had elected him to do.

End of story.

The same is expected of the descendants of said paragon. Just do it, even though it will be costly, will take mountains of moving to do. This is what the people chose, so it shall be done.

G-d bless the wisdom of old, and the fortitude of the bold. G-d bless England.

What is it truly to be an American? If you look deep down, and at the very apocryphal layers of that Great and amazing country, you come to a place of secrecy.
Have you wondered why there was this weird pyramid on your five dollar bills? Or what that beacon on the top of the liberty statue means, or what about the fact that most of Washington D.C. is a huge Egyptian city?

I will tell you why.

Some years ago, I was approached by the freemasons, and then by the knights higher up in the hierarchy. It was at a time, where I, tumultuously broke through internationally, and I was at the same time being buried under a lot of pressure from government bodies, so I didn’t really have either the energy or the appreciation about what was happening.

Imagine you were approached by secret knights of the jedi order wanting you to be a knight in their order.

I came through with it at some level, and I am proud to say, that today I do represent the order of st. John, the Maltese nights. Having a high position in that order.

It sounds weird right? Like having pyramids on the five dollar bills.

I learned some things, but one thing I truly learned from my senior teacher, was the value of Egyptology.

I didn’t really understand all that talk about Egypt, but then I started digging.

I realised, there was a layer, or are layers of our civilisation that harks all the way back to ancient Egypt. That is why we keep putting up all those cenotaphs, have crosses in our religions, talk about Glasnost or illumination.

But after reading a lot on the history of Egypt, I realised that only gave me a superficial knowledge. I needed to go deeper yet.

I found the answers I was looking for in two sources. One is Plato. The other is what you call hermeticism.

Plato you most probably know, at least in name, hermeticism you most probably do not know.

Hermeticism is comprised of a series of secret writings that date all the way back to the hellenised Egypt. That is when the Greeks held Egypt.

So it is actually a bit of a mix between Greek philosophy and the ancient Egyptian philosophy. However, it is the best that we have got.

In this view, you have the sun G-d Ra, living in the amazing city On or Heliopolis. He will spread the light by telling the truth.

The TRUTH is the light.

See?

The eye on the pyramid of the five dollar note, is the eye of the G-d Ra, shining his light, the truth on everybody.

The same of the statue of liberty, what she shines from the beacon, is the truth.

It was brought to the US through some of the masonic orders. The US being one of the principal strongholds of masonry.

Well, you probably have a feeling about this, at least if you have seen the Star Wars series, where this is depicted, most beautifully in the order of the Jedi (Templars and Maltese nights) fighting for the republic.

What you may not know however, and this is where you need to peak your ears, is what it is you actually DO with these ideas.

What you do, is that you stand tall, unbowed by pressure, unbowed by the naysayers, the liars, the manipulators, the know it alls, and you speak truth.

It may sound easy, but that is the most difficult thing there is to do here on earth. Even though it is the basis of many a creed and religion, being honest and open spoken about the problems of a society is the most difficult there is.

You will be haunted by all those who wish to cloud the truth in order to have power.

You will get nothing out of being true, and yet you have to do it.

Who would do such a thing? Being true, knowing that it will give you nothing but misery?

Jesus did it, Ghandi did it, Tolstoy did it, Moses did it, Luther did it and many many more.

If you want Change, you have to be true.

That is what it is to be American. At the heart of that Great and strong country is. This is what it is, to be true.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Reading about the roots of liberalism in the US, really makes me feel sorry for liberals. I think Alinsky had some of the right ideas, but the methods! The immorality, the Chicago style is just not right.

Philosophy needs to be honest and search for a betterment of the conditions of man, be idealistic.

Marx wanted something better for man, though he miscalculated in some places. However, his ideas were honest.

So were the ideas of Lenin and Trotsky.

But the Franfurterschool of eternal criticism, of sexual liberalism, of deconstruction was dishonest. They sought to create the conditions of a marxist revolution, when there were no such conditions. Thereby becoming the problem, not the answer.

In Denmark, it is much different. Here we have had no radical theorist, but rather benign and positive theoreticians like Hal Koch who truly believed in freedom of speech married to a Socialdemocratic ideology.

He talked about dialogue and democracy. Wanting to get Denmark away from the Nazism of the Second world war.

Then there has been Brandes, a true enlightener. He believed in humanism and enlightenment.

Grundtvig who was the national romantic, believing in enlightenment for the people. Giving the people wisdom.

Kierkegaard, you know him. The romantic aristocrat.

H.C. Andersen, another fairy taler.

All these men wanted something better for the world.

They were dreamers and idealists.

Now, we have to find a new path for the liberal perspective of the US.

Let us start by defining it as something positive. It should not use immoral methods. Yes we have to defend ourselves, but we also have to stay honest.

I think your fascination of me, has led you to something deeper than you really understand. I represent a development. I am the latest philosopher in a long line of thinkers.

There is a depth in my ideas. That has never truly been appreciated by the academia of the US.

Since most of you came from a system that was Anglo Saxon in the beginning, these roots are your roots.

This is not to say, that there not are place for other peoples roots as well. There are, but, latching on to me. Will give you democracy, humanism, freedom of speech, nationality a Jewish/protetant view, and so on.

What I will attempt to give you, is a bit deeper perspective. Something you can build upon.

Now Denmark is popular. This will not be forever. But while it is, I hope I can give you some of all the interesting and beautiful theories we have developed here in Denmark. It will be the Danish renaissance, and it will hopefully fill up a hole in the US. That is the longing for dreams and positivity.

G-d bless the US of America.

Well, it so happens, it is Christmas day right now. My little family is out on another family gathering, and I am sitting here in the mess of paper from presents and in the light of my own little personal Menorah.

I am a Jew, but living in Denmark would make it a crime not to celebrate Christmas, since it is more of a pagan holiday than a Christian. On the other hand, with the interest I have had with the Christian church, it feels good to remember what Jesus Christ meant on this day. As it is a day of remembrance for these religions.

Add to this the day of the Muslim holiday of Eid. We just have it all.

I know that there is a lot of violence in Europe right now, and I have been talking a lot about tackling this with force, but with justice and humanity as well.

I believe, that the current track of awful crimes done by mainly muslims is a disgrace to all who believe in G-d.

At the end of the day, monotheism is about the family, about sharing, about finding each other in the embrace of spirit and love.

That is it. Everything that has come after that, is either a strengthening of this position or something more sinister.

I know that many muslims do not agree with the killings of innocent people that have happened in Iraq, the tearing down of old monuments, the destruction of not only Roman remains, but also ancient mosques.

I know that, and the world embracing caliphate, has to make enemies for those who do not want to be conquered. Especially vikings who are not used to be conquered, but on the other hand has conquered the rest of the world.

G-d is about unity and embrace. Division is materialism.

However, the problem is, that we, as people of G-d are prone to fight in the material world, to uphold the wisdom of G-d. Fighting for G-d however should be married to wisdom, otherwise materialism has swallowed you whole.

This is the constant balance of the fighters of light. Never to be sure on the right path, always praying, always reflecting on the moral issues, always trying to see the most peaceful path.

As the discussion of migration in Europe. The more people migrating into Europe, especially Muslims, the more conflict there will be.

The ethical consequence of this is not to call for more migration, because that will lead to more violence.

The moral answer would be to make space between the muslims and christians living in Europe.

The more you mix it up, the more violence you have.

At the same time, the islamists, who are mostly, too violent to be contained at all, should be fought.

That is why I say; do not go with the easy answer. Just think of the consequences of the trends. Not only today but also years ahead.

Europe is heading for a very dark time, due to our naivety. We should stop being naive, and look at the consequences of the communities that is struck by globalisation or whatever you call it.

Be wise.

G-d bless the wisdom of man, may it reach the wisdom of spirit in prayer. Merry Christmas, Eid, Hanuka and Jul.

I have just finished the book by Andrew Breibart called “Righteous indignation”. He is not much of a fan of mr. Alinsky, I will give him that.

I see his points, and, in many ways, I agree. I think he is one of the most visionary, antiegalitarian, pompous, honest, midleaning conservatives the US of A has ever produced. You must miss him.

He burned out his candle far too quickly.

What does he teach us? First of all, he teaches us, that the Frankfurterschool that you guys were as unlucky to get as you were, were basically hacks.

They had absolutely no loyalty to the US. After all, they were not that keen on the French Revolution (American Revolution) but much more keen on the Russian Revolution.

In fact, I think they gave a bad name to Jews in the US, not exactly the place we need to be unpopular.

Seen from a Danish perspective. It is quite clear to me, that they would never have made it so far in Europe, as they have done in the US.

Why? Because the intellectual level of Europe is higher than that in the US, and they would have been outmanoeuvred at an earlier time.

This I do not say to make americans feel sorry, but to point to the real problem that the Frankfurterschool poses for the US; it shows, that you seriously need to up your game when it comes to intellectualism.

You need to raise the bar.

Philosophy should be honest and show a better future. All European philosophy is like that, even Nazism, even though it was depraved, they still believed it to be a better system than Communism.

What you need to do, is let me make a philosophical underpinning under your own revolution.

It is quite common for philosophers to make constitutions, but you have a world-class constitution. The founding fathers made a good job of that. What you do need however, is a theoretical explanation of what the founding fathers thought about when they made things.

If you have this, you will be less prone to be bullied, and infiltrated.

The thing is, you have a much better Revolution than the Russian revolution. You have the American Revolution. You seem not the be in understanding what you really have. Usually revolutions will either work or disintegrate. The Russian revolution did not work, because the foundation was not all that well built. (Sorry Putin)

The American Revolution however still seems to pick up its revolutionaries from here and there. Right mr. Sanders?

And that is good, because only through the blood of the martyrs will a tree keep sprouting new leaves.

You have an amazing system, that you just need to open your eyes for. The humanistic, democratic society, that has never seen it’s like before. You need to keep it sound. That is what politics is about, and that is what mr. Breibart gave his life for.

He war a revolutionary, an American revolutionary.

He points us in the direction of what the US really is. This is not against mr. Alinsky. He was a democrat as well, but it is against critical theory.

The new generation should stop fighting their parents, and start fighting the tyrants around the globe. Especially the tyrants that want to subdue them. Like the islamists that brought down the twin towers, and is now moving into Europe.

There is an honest fight there, for all that it is worth for an American Revolutionary.

G-d bless the United States of America.

It is with immense sadness that I hear about the two incidents of terror these last days. First the attack on a Russian diplomat, then the horrendous attack on civilians in Germany.

This is what I have been talking about; an islamist terror attack duo right at the heart of both the East and the West.

This is what we have to learn from the incidents. This is not the East against the West. We are both targets. So we need to work together on this.

We are friends not enemies.

We also have to remind ourselves, that this enemy is relentless and lacks any kind of decency and morals. It does not accept normal rules of warfare, using civilians and diplomats as targets.

This is not a noble enemy we are facing, as we have earlier as with Saladin, this is an inhuman, decrepit, violent aggressor that uses any means to get to his goals; torture, killing of civilians. He will not have any borders when it comes to humanity. He will be stopped by nothing.

We should realise this, as we prepare for the onslaught on this enemy.

Especially the US is ready, is Europe?

Let us not forget what we are fighting for, and against. We are fighting for freedom and humane democracy, in the face of an inhuman enemy.

Let us be honest about this, and prepare for the worst. Because the worst we can imagine, will be a walk in the park compared to the reality that will come.

G-d bless the will to be vigilant and prepared.

Well, it seems to me, that Denmark is coming around. My good friends in the Danish Conservative Party, have promised me, that we are seeing things done.

So far, it has come around, that is good. But, we will see if they do as they say.

I however trust them. These are good people.

This leaves us with Norway, that still seems to be outpouring statefunded islamist propaganda, that we in the Scandinavia then can be bothered with.

Perhaps they will do a turn around as well, we will see.

However, good to see Denmark coming around, and that might as well save Denmark from more international humiliations.

G-d bless the will to be honest and sincere.

I think that what we should do now, after we lost the election, a part from trying to play a constructive role, whenever that is possible, is to use this opportunity to rearm ourselves with new ammunition.

How do we do that? By listening to the voices of our critics. In my mind, critics are a gift sent from heaven, they will teach you to do better, if you listen to what they are saying.

What Andrew Breibart is saying, is that we have been too stuck into a Frankfurterschool political correctness. As in blaming everybody who we disagree with as racists and so on.

Well, hands down. He is right. We have been too cocky on our own selfworth, and simple answers in the Frankfurterschool has not only made us stupid. It has also scared away all the workers.

I believe, that Barack and I have already worked quite a lot on that. Working on the business issues, production issues, issues of islamists, family, spirituality and so on. But instead of accepting things as they stand, we need to broaden the scope, and give ourselves good tools for a comeback.

Doesn’t that sound like a much better idea than trying to put pokes in the wheels of the Conservatives?

Political development has been too much of a mud fest, and too little about finding those satisfactory answers to the problems of our nation.

Anyway, you have me right? Have I ever let you down? No, have I made new ideas available for you? Yes, will I be loyal and a good friend, despite the sacrifice it will be for me? Yes.

So do not worry too much, we will pick up the mess and do something about it.

Just, stay honest, that is truly the criticism of Breibart, let us not abuse the power we have, but be good and truly supportive.

G-d bless the will to do good.

When I started my political/intellectual career many years ago, I was in a fearsome rebellion against the oppression of the liberal media. I was in the vanguard of the internet revolution and a pioneer in new media.

I raged against the machine.

Now, I have realised, after reading the book of Andrew Breibart; Righteous Indignation, that the entire background of mr. Trump, is precisely the same.

I remember, when I first realised, that the main stream media was trying to picture the reality in a way, that was wrong.

It was at the same time, as the iconic movie “Matrix” was released. You had this feeling, that you could either choose the red, or that blue pill. Which one is for you Nemo?

The allegory makes sense now; it was about going on the internet, and realising, that there is a whole other story out there, than the Liberal media wants it to be.

After some time, I hooked up with mr. Obama. He is, himself, a rebel of sorts, and he did not buy the whole oppression of the conservatives idea. He wanted to cooperate, and work with the Conservatives from the start. You can see it in his hand shake with mr. Trump. Mr. Obama is not a divisive character. He is an honest and gracious person.

So by taking me in the innermost workings of the liberal party, he took a rebel and made him an architect. Wrap your head around that for a second.

In Matrix, the name of the city that Nemo reaches is Zion. The vessel is called Nebuchadnezzar.

Zion being zionism, that Israel. Nebuchadnezzar being Law and justice. Since king Nebuchadnezzar was the inventor of the law.

With the work, I have done for mr. Obama, I have, in a sense been accepted and infused into the machine. I have become a part of it, in a positive sense.

The internet revolution has become a part of the system.

We should make a choice now, in the Liberal camp. Do we start enforcing more rules on media, or do we open up?

I say, make an open world. As Niels Bohr taught us. We should not start clamping down on ideas we do not like.

After all, we have the best ideas, even Trump is following us, so why should we.

And, we are not mr. Smiths, and “the machine” or “the Matrix”, we are honest, law abiding, sincere Alinskyietes who are fighting for a more equal and democratic world.

That is the core, and that is strong enough for us to uphold the power that we deserve.

G-d bless the will to be honest, and open.

It is a kind of strange, so many years since I started at SIAD, and finally we are at the end of the station in terms of the political fight. I won, hands down, no one forgotten, all remembered all honoured, I won.

The strange thing about is however, I have none to celebrate with. I am alone, all my friends have fallen along the way, and I am the only one left.

As Lot when he looked down to Sodom and Gommorah, he knew that he was the only one who had the stamina to keep the perspective.

Except this time G-d will not punish us, he will redeem us.

Now, all that there is left of this fight, is for me to get all the laurels, the recognition, the praise.

But right now, as Trump moves into the White House, and he is picking up on my ideas, as the fight is moving to Europe, and the leftist media have lost their grip on me. I am all alone, there is none to call, those who once did answer, answers no more. Democracy has had its final hero, walking into the cave to save it. But on the way he lost all his palls. They are all gone, only one man back in the fight.

It is lonely here, but I did it for good, and with my and all my friends sacrifices, we have saved the West and the East. All the descendants of the vikings that once sailed out from Scandinavia. We have saved them, at the most difficult moment, we did it.

What comes now, is a fierce fight, and we can lose it, if we are not careful. But the tide has turned, and we have a very, very clear shot at redemption. That is; all the nations of Europe, Russia, the US, we are back as a world leading powerhouse.

And, in a rare boast, I did it.

I am so proud of that. And I am so proud of all those who were friends along the way. We did it!

We should be proud of that. The turn around of the West and the East.

The turn around, the turn around. We did it!

G-d bless the tenacity of the believers in democracy and spirit.

Well, it appears to me to, that most of my plans are working. I know, that the CIA is pretty critical towards the friendship between mr. Putin and mr. Trump. But why not try looking at it this way; it is an opener for a better relationship.

I know, that there are still some unsolved problems i Ukraine, and the two leaders should solve these problems, in fact I believe that this crisis is the first international test of mr. Trump. If he manages to solve this crisis, he will have done a great deal in a short time. He has the necessary political capital with mr. Putin, there are actually no doctrinal differences between the two, and there is a chance to solve the crisis.

What I believe however, is that we still need to have a ground level understanding of the problems we are facing. The crisis is still the same, two parts of Ukraine; Luhansk and Donetsk want to be a part of Russia. This is, in my opinion their own choice. As with Sevastopol and Krim, we need to hear the voice of the people. Otherwise this will be unfair. We should then, all of us, accept that verdict. Luhansk and Donetsk have already held an election, where they voted to stay with Russia. That is their choice in my opinion.

We however need to compensate Ukraine for the loss of territory. This we could do by giving them some lucrative business deals, help them rebuilding their country, send some of our leading intellectuals to help their school system, rebuild their armed forces, give them money to make a new start.

In this way they lose territory, but gain development.

I know that this is a difficult situation, with a lot of historical grievances, but the solution should be fair.

Not to mention, that we really could use the good people of Ukraine in the coming war against the Islamists in Europe, something they know a bit about.

This is how I would tackle it. If there are any better ideas out there, please let me hear.

G-d bless the peace we should find.

Well, it is time for another swing of the old humanistic/democratic warhorse at battle.

Once again do the old warrior face an inhuman opponent. Once again is it time to raise that flag of freedom. Let it unfurl in the wind, and stand guard at its side.

This time, it is not nazism or communism, it is islamism. The end foe of our benign and good faith. The opposite of Democracy, the opposite of humanism. A faith willing to tread upon those whom it dislikes with the foulest of methods.

After the Syrian/Iraqi war, the next theatre of war will be Europe, in this theatre there will be numerous allies, and a few opponents.

My take on it, would be to advance diplomatic players as soon as mr. Trump gets into office. Let ambassadors start either advancing good strategies or threats to the country.

I am absolutely certain, that with the right set of ambassadors, we can do this.

For the few potential adversaries, that is Norway and Denmark, we will have to flip them.

That should be the initial strategy. Contact the leaders of countries, and urge them to join the fray.

In Denmark, they are pretty stubborn, but the current PM mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen can be swayed.

We have to see a widespread crackdown on all the persecution of pro democratic intellectuals in Denmark. That is Flemming Rose, Lars Hedegaard, me, Uwe Max Jensen and Morten Storm.

At the same time, pro islamist propaganda by the mainstream media, especially the BBC´s of Denmark and Norway, should be stopped immediately. No more mr. positive islamist, cute islamist girls on tv and the like. We need a crackdown on that as well.

When we have flipped the last remaining countries, we then need to make more elaborate strategies involving new tech. It seems to me, that DARPA has been focusing on the personal drone tech. Tech that will help our infantry a lot. This should be held in US military only, and kept under lid, so that no islamist will get a hand on it, at all.

This is on our tech edge in the guerilla fighting that may start.

This is it gentlemen. The fight is moving to another scenario, actually, I believe we are more or less ready. We can keep soldiers alive, and we will win!

G-d bless the will to fight another day, for Democracy!

Well, it seems to me, that the discussion on how and why we at the Democratic Party lost the election is still going on.

I think some of the analysis we have heard has been right on a more superficial level, but it has not discussed on a deeper level.

I mean, what has really happened in American politics in the last twenty some years?

I have become aware of mr. Andrew Breibart lately. Honestly I did not even know about his existence, the network of SIAD that I have been a part of was, is connected to Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer not Breibart.

But after mr. Trump has reached out to Steve Bannon. I have realised the importance of Breibart, and have consequently done some research on the issue.

He died, mysteriously five years ago. At the height of the antiblog hysteria. A lot of the people who started the new anti “Franfurterschool” anti “political correctness school” has died, especially the liberal/conservative. That is Pim Fortuyn in Holland, Breibart in the US, Theo van Gogh, Charlie Hebdo. Here in Denmark, it has been quite close as well. My organisation the Vilks Committee was attacked a few years ago, and I was just lucky not to be there when the islamist came in with their guns.

Nonetheless, Breibart, Pim Fortuyn and I have pushed a new agenda, that is fundamentally different from what we used to have, but at certain points not so different.

We have pushed a pro Israel policy, anti islamist, pro gay, pro anti racist, pro democratic, pro humanistic, pro religious, pro defense, pro equality.

So where we have been attacked for being the “alt-right” and so on, what we have really been is very much mid leaning, just taking the challenges that of now. That is islamist, declining economy, border chaos, an academic world that is becoming more and more superficial. At the end of the day, we are not extremist. We are actually midleaning.

The interesting thing is also, that whereas Breibart in the US has been a conservative movement, what Barack and I have done together has been democratic. So in a sense, the same doctrinal trends have gripped the center both right and left.

What I am saying is, that what we need to do in both camps actually, is to get back in the center.
Many people, believe that for instance Paul Alinsky was a fringe movement. I disagree on this. He had three points, as I see it. 1. Democracy. 2. The workers movement. 3. Minorities. In other words, he was a Social Democrat. Not a communist.

This is what we can build on. Change is not communist. It is actually much more American revolution than Russian (sorry mr. Putin). It is about democracy, humanism, and where he left us, we can pick up the pace again. Because he blasted a path for us there, that I believe we can follow. The strangeness of it, knowing that mr. Breibart had the same ideas. Speaking of ancient Egypt and so on. Mr. Breibart was a fan of the American revolution as well, I believe.

G-d bless the United States of America, may he live again.

To be a strong man can be difficult, I you have difficulty DIRECTING your strength.
As of old, what we say here in Scandinavia, where we have been trying to work on our viking strength. We say, that a strong man needs to direct his strength with wisdom.

If you are strong, and you pick up fights that are unwise, then your superior goals will not be attained.

Wisdom in relation to strength is to figure out when to fight, who to fight, and when you do it, you do it with a strategical aim in mind.

In that sense, politics is a bit like business. You see what you have, work with it, to enhance your overall business.

I am then not talking about diminishing your strength, what I am talking about is giving it the right DIRECTION.

G-d bless the wisdom of old.

We need to start discussing the strategy towards IS.

As of now, mr. Obama has done his job, cornered the bastards in Syria, and almost finished the job there. He will.

After that, they are about to swarm Europe.

In this situation, we are required to cooperate with the European powers.

This we have to be absolutely clear about. Some we will be friendly with, others not so friendly.

France is on our side completely. They fight for democracy, they have really felt the whip of the islamists over and over again, and we have a long tradition of fighting the same ideological fights. This fight against the islamists particularly. We need to cooperate with them,

Germany the same. Ms. Merkel has made a turn around on the fight against the islamists. And that will be a cooperation.

Strangely enough even Sweden appears to be on our side as well. They are really in trouble. But we need to cooperate with them, and see where that will get us.

There are however two countries that have not responded well to an islamist crackdown. Sadly my own country Denmark and Norway.

Recently Norwegian television, that is the state sponsored TV, has shown a despicable series of a young islamist being an ideal to young norwegians, and the young norwegians are buying it. It is called “Skam”, that is young norwegians should feel ashamed of not living up to islamist rules. Simple as that.

The same television series is now broadcasted by the Danish TV.

These kinds of obvious attempt of islamising the youth is disgusting, and should be stopped immediately.

In Denmark, there is plenty of talk, but no action.

We will see to which side Denmark turns, but it does not look good. I have repeated, on my Danish blog, the critical stance, but nothing appears to happen.

So we may start up with some pressure on the states, but have to realise that we may have to enter the country and finish of the islamist there, if the government refuses to do it themselves.

So we need a more detailed strategy, that looks at each country differently based on their allegiance to our democratic cause.

Some we can cooperate with, others not.

But to finish the job on IS. We need to push Europe.

G-d bless the willingness to fight for good.

One thing I have to get off my chest in regards to the UK election about the EU, is the problems that mr. Cameron and mr. Johnson has had. Well, before the election, I really liked them both. So much, that I gave it all in the election mr. Cameron won. Remember, I helped mr. Cameron win that election.

But after the EU election the two former friends, and that being a formidable couple, lost their friendship.

That was very, very unfortunate. Especially with friends that had been together for so long. Then mr. Cameron got so sore, that he destroyed the chances of mr. Johnsons bid for the Premier post. What a mess!

I believe, that is was right for mr. Johnson not to go after the PM post, and I truly hope he did it, to keep his friendship with mr. Cameron.

Well, let us start by recognising the tremendous good that mr. Cameron has done to Great Britain. He, singlehandedly made a huge turnaround for the Conservative party, and he rebuilt the British economy. However, most vital of all, he won the election for a united Great Britain. We are inclined to forget that in the aftermath of the EU election. He won his first election.

So, for good and bad. Mr. Cameron has changed the UK a lot.

What he did contribute with, was that conservatism married to a liberal perspective. As mr. Churchill, he was a little bit of both. That was his true strength.

Now, he is out for good, and mr. Johnson is still there feeling only a half man. But that is politics. You have friends, and you lose them again.

It is time for mr. Johnson to fulfil the promise of an illustrious career, and get going with the rebuilding of the British Empire.

That task is indeed Churchillian.

Nevertheless, he also needs to make friends with David again, if that is at all possible.

You can lose your friendship, but you can also gain it again, if you try.

But, mr. Johnson, it is time for you to fulfil your promise.

G-d bless the will to be and realise what you truly are.

I have not commented on UK politics since ms. May entered the fray. I believe, that this was wrong, it is just because the consequences of the election are so far reaching and difficult, that I suppose I have refrained from doing it.

Anyway, what is really the result of the election in the UK? It is, that the English Empire has reemerged.

It is as simple as that. Why? Because the natural companions of the UK, are all the former colonies of the empire. Especially the parts that are still seeing themselves as part british; Australia, New Zealand, the Falkland Islands and so on. That is a broad part of the globe still English. They speak English, they have a British mindset, they work as Englishmen. They even have the same darn humor!

The problem with this realisation however is, that it excludes a lot of the migrants that have recently settled in Great Britain. Especially the Muslim migrants.

They do not see themselves as a part of the British Empire, in fact, they hate it.

So, we have a conflict here.

Not doing anything about it however, will not get us anywhere. We will need to address the issues. The Brits are getting a bit sore, and mr. Farage is poking his head out again. We have to realise, that we have to fulfil our promises.

What are our promises? It is to get rid of all the migrants that are destroying community life in the rural parts of England.

Start there.

You need to realise, that all the crime, the drugs, the islamist gang rapes and so on, are not tolerated. You need to work on that.

We have to talk about repatriation of those newly arrived migrants, who are not in acceptance of rural English peace.

No more rapes, theft, abuse of the social system and so on.

At the same time, we need to weed out the infiltration of the bodies of the state. There are too many with islamist connections in the states and communal system. We just have to tackle that.

It will be difficult, but if not, mr Farage will put the boot on our behinds, and he will kick us out.

So we need to move.

G-d bless the willingness to do things right, with a humane decency.

It appears to me to, that we Liberals are in a bit of a predicament. People are feeling demoralised, and seem to have lost hope.

What really went wrong? First of all, we lost the votes of the workers. That is the first, second and third problem. I believe I did point to that fact over and over again. But ms. Clinton simply did not have the rapport with the workers. She is too far away in terms of politics and engagement.

So, we had the right strategy. We just did not win on it. Our candidate was too far away from the swing voters we needed to win.

This again gives us an idea about what we should do to win the next time; we need to work on a political platform that includes the workers.

We have been too engrossed in human rights, minority protection, global warming and so on. As a result, we lost the connection to our roots.

Don´t get me wrong, what I am saying is not that the minority problems are not important. But we have to get back into the middle of politics.

There is however the problem, that in order to reach out for the workers, we need a worker as candidate. Someone who can understand them. Gets their point of view and they feel are like them. Someone like mr. Biden.

I have the feeling, that we have not seen the last of mr. Biden, and I truly hope he has not given up. In fact, I know he has not given up.

For me, I have one very difficult task. Mr. Trump asked for my guidance, he will have it, because we need to stand together in these difficult times. I will not allow the country down by turning it into a mess of conflicts running left and right. We need to pull ourselves up by the roots of our respective hair, and get things going. We owe this to the Nation.

But at the same time, I will try to lift up the Democratic party, and prepare it for some of the Change that Barrack and I fought for.

This will be pretty difficult, but nonetheless possible, if I just try to do things right.

I have thought about what we may do, and I will be back with more.

Perhaps I will even enter the mainstream media with a book on it. We will see.

G-d bless the will to do good and right, in the face of difficulty.

Well, it seems to me, that all my foreign policy plans have, magically come into focus again.

Allow me to give an explanation.

In the first term of mr. Barrack Obamas presidency, mr. Obama and I worked together quite a lot. We worked on the Arab Spring, the relationship to Russia and other things.

At that time, my basic plan was to try to make a good relationship between the US and Russia, and get IS into focus.

That did work out in the beginning. Before Ukraine, the relationship between Russia and the US was actually really good. After Ukraine, we still kept chugging on, as we succeeded on making IS a target that kind of had the ok from all international players. Including most of the Muslim players in the Middle East.

That war is reaching a kind of milestone in Syria/Iraq, where they are nearly finished off.

So what is next?

There are two things, that I have tried to prepare the American military establishment for:

1. The fight with IS in Europe
2. The fight with China

First the fight with IS in Europe. It was pretty clear to me, that a showdown was looming in Europe. My priority was to make it a showdown. That would strengthen us, and not destroy us. With the current infiltration of most of our civic as well as security apparatus, needless to say, this a pretty tough fight coming up.

My strategy was to try to prepare the system with a philosophy that was straight and fair. I put up democracy against islamism.

This has worked for the betterment of our Western systems. In fact, it has strengthened the democratic faiths of most nations.

I did not know it when i started out on the strategy, but it pretty soon turned out, that the US really loved the ideas. After thinking about it, it was quite evident what it was all about; after all, democracy IS the core faith of the US. I just did not think about it, when I made the strategies.

Anyway, it got us into a fight between a humanistic/democratic faith against what we know as Islamic state.

The fighting is moving to Europe, and, quite fantastically, mr. Trump now urges European states to invest more in defence. Perfect! I really encourage that, when the s… hits the fan, perhaps we are prepared after all.

However, perhaps, the US generals should worry about the kind of fighting we are entering. The basic moral is clear, we ARE fighting for democracy, but the kind of war we are entering can be grim. I do however believe, that the Americans will support the fighting, they are ready to fight the IS, if it is done with as much care for the lives of the servicemen as at all possible.

Secondly the fight against China. This is the real fight. The fight against IS will be bloody, terrible, angstprovoking, horrible, but it is pretty easy to win it. We just have to get started, as we are.

The fight against China however, is quite another matter. If we do not make peace with Russia, we will lose. We cannot fight both Russia and China. If we only fight China, we have a good chance.

There were, however, one or rather two obstacles. The first being, that China has been good at spying on our military capabilities. To a point where they almost knew our secrets better than we did. That was brought to the table some years ago, and it has been worked on. I am not hundred percent sure, that we are ready for the fight, but I hope so. Otherwise we will just have to wait until we get a green light from the military officials.

So, this is what i think we should do it!.

1. We take down IS in Europe, saving Europe, and making the entire West stronger. It will take some time, but after a few years, we would have made some headway.
2. At the same time, we will tackle China, reenforce our military capabilities, and take home whatever American production that is still in China. In fact work with all our allies to isolate China.

That will be, more or less, eight years of work. Nonetheless, at the end of that, we will be back, and not only America, but all of the West, actually including Russia, we be strong again!

G-d bless the will to be cunning and strategic.

It seems to me, that an anti EU vawe is crashing the shores of the European union. But the fact of the matter is rather, that what people are voting against, is not really the EU. It is those who support the EU they do not like. They do not appreciate people who have been trying through manipulation and back door negotiations, to change the political makeup of Europe.

I mean, why should they. People look for honest, accountable leaders, who fight for them, and tries, their best to avoid corruption in their government.

The process around the EU build up has been made on unsound principles, and whenever the electorate was heard on the issues, they, quite openly, rejected the project.

So the political system should not be surprised. What has happened is really just the shift of the electorate from rebelling by votes directly connected to the EU. To take these grievances to the voting of the national parliaments.

If the elites cannot see this obvious connection, well, they should, honestly, find something else to make. It is very obvious.

I think the political establishment thought, that if it just made EU, it could, after it was built, make people like it.

Well, despite all the efforts done. It simply did not succeed. Mainly because all the decision the EU system has made, has been in direct opposition to the interest of the electorate. Like the decision to force Denmark to take migrants in, in direct opposition to 80% of the electorate. If you want to get unpopular, by all means, that is what you do.

As all other governmental entities or system, the EU system has, perhaps finally come to the realisation, that you can only survive if you have a reasonable support of the constituency. Without it, you will end up in the cemetery, with all the rest of political systems that has failed.

As always, what really destroys a doctrinal system, is the ethical ways of it. Like the KGB that finally destroyed the Soviet Union or the sexual machinations of the french aristocracy before the French revolution. The EU with its arrogance and unethical behaviour towards all who are in disagreement with them (my daughter can testify to that), is what ruins the EU.

What I do hope though, is that the system that ends the EU will be a good and civilised one, at least, that is what I have been working on.

G-d bless the will of the Europeans.

It is kind of contradictory to see the guy that you actually fought against, using your own ideas to benefit not only him, but also the rest of America.

Seriously, that saving the plant in Indianapolis, was just really good.

I have discussed this with myself a lot; how do you really keep the production of a nation inside the nation. I have been inspired a bit by Ayn Rand, whom my friend Lars Seier is really into. But just giving businesses high fives and medals is not really helping that much.

The taxbreak idea that mr. Obama had, seems to work a bit better in fact, a whole lot better.

It really just warms my heart to see those dogs of construction with their missing teeth and their hearts broken, if they had lost their jobs, be so happy.

I may not be a man of production myself, but I really do feel with these simple guys, trying to make ends meet, feed their little ones, putting a little something aside for old age.

These are real people, and they just got their jobs back. That is good politics in action. Seeing the tears in their eyes, and smiles on their faces, just makes all the hassle and all the sacrifice worth it. For all that is worth, well done mr. Trump. Please use my ideas more, if it puts smiles on faces like that. That is goodness in action.

G-d bless the will to do good, to those lowest in the hierarchy.

Source: http://wapo.st/2gI60Ot

I keep thinking about Oxford. It kind of drags me towards it. Not the surface, not the jolly pubs in and around Oxford, but something deeper.

When I was in Oxford. I was so fortunate to join a symposium in the church of saint Marys. A beautiful little church at the heart of Oxford.

I believe it taught me something vital about Oxford. That Oxford, at the heart, is a tiny, beautiful, peaceful little church, with the humility of a country side parish.

This is truly amazing. I think. When I compare to my own school; Vallekilde. Vallekilde is forged as the hammer of Thor. That is the secret of my school. The secret of Oxford is the parish church.

But just besides the smallish church lies huge and impressive buildings. Buildings like the Camera and the bridge of sighs.

In these buildings, the feeling is not of simplicity and life, it is of grandioseness and emptiness.

This is the problem. The heart of Oxford is not the problem. It is indeed sound and alive. However, the larger structure, the structure of metaphysics is abandoned.

That is, the theoretical foundation under the great structures has been shut down, and no one is living in them anymore.

This is what I am trying to say, and I know that Oxford is trying to say as well. The heart is still living, but the buildings around it, need reform.

As in Cambridge, where mr. Hawkins is king. We in Oxford need to be leading some other intellectual area. That is metaphysics.

Yes, I know people will tell you, that is not possible, and metaphysics is dead and so on. Oxford will disagree. It lives, and with the resurrection of metaphysics, not ot only the Anglican church will have a rebirth, all religion will with it.

This is the scale, and the potential. And this is exactly why I so insistent on urging the intellectuals of Oxford to stay in the fight, and put some life in the greater structures of not only Oxford, but faith itself.

G-d bless the will of the believers.

We are finishing the final months of mr. Barrack Obamas presidency.

It was a blast! And I hope, that the world has become a better place. I know we lost the last election, but we did a good job nonetheless. A lot of the policies we launched is adopted by the subsequent conservative government, so they live on.

That must mean we did something right then?

Anyway, there are a lot of difficult problems coming up, that we need to chip into. Do not get depressed, if we just learn from our mistakes, and chug on, we will change everything.

What I am concerned with right now, is border control.

We need to make that, and we need to work on it, from a collaborative perspective.

Border control is really going to change the way the US is working, so we need to be constructive in this process, and try to work with the other side.

First of all, I think we should start thinking about border control from a rational and humane perspective. There is nothing wrong in having borders. What is wrong, is to have borders in order to differ on a racist basis. That was the problem of the borders of South Africa. They were racist borders. Then there is also a problem in having borders to keep people in the country as in Eastern Germany, where you were shot if you tried leaving the country with no visa.

So the question is, as I see it; why are we having borders? And what are we doing with them?

As I understand it, the main problem, right now, is migration crime.

A lot of the migrants that come to the US have no jobs and start stealing. That is off cause a legitimate concern.

A country is a system also. In the US, it is a Republic. If the core values of a Republic, that is the democratic process and law, is beginning to wear down, Houston we have a problem!

The basic problem with not having a border is that the security and protection of the citizens are put in jeopardy. The strong puts down the weak.

This is a core institutional task to remedy. If the law is broken, the Republic falls. That is not a viable option.

So, we need to do something about that. Since they are, honestly, not our problem. Mexico should deal with, since it is their citizens, not ours.

If Mexico is unwilling to take their own citizens back, we could use the Australian method, and send them to a camp where they will do no harm. A harsh solution, but that is where we are right now, unfortunately.

G-d bless the most humane solution is this very difficult situation.

Now, what we need right now is a revolution. We have discussed the Marxist revolution, that, honestly did not work. It is simply too shallow a construct. There are lot of good things in it, like public healthcare, but the construction itself is simply not working.

What we need is another revolution. That is the American revolution. The revolution where fierce freedom fighters stood up against tyranny for a fair and just world. The revolution where the humane man was first invented.

This revolution is really the true revolution, but a revolution that needs the blood of the young to go on working. We need to stand and fight for justice.

My point is; as Alinsky said, what really is the core of the Liberal revolution is Democracy.

That road will lead us to victory yet again. Our young people chose that, let us spur them on, let us ask them to join another day, another fight.

Who is the enemy? The enemy is the tyrant. As of now, mr. Trump seems to be accept his responsibility with a certain professional attitude, that is, he works inside the system. That is his right, breaking down the system is what we should be mindful of. He might just be ok after all.

Anyway, we have to find those tyrants, they are everywhere, right now in head chopping terrorists first and foremost. We need to bring the pain to them, as they have been putting fear in us.

We need to brighten up, put up our banner and fight for freedom!

G-d bless the United States of America.

It has been a while since the beginning of the American election, and some of the issues that are close to my heart have lacked the attention that it deserves. I am only one solitary Jew, what am I to do?

Anyway, the discussion of spirit has taken a leap in my own head. After reading quite a lot about the Danish physicist Niels Bohr, I realised a couple of things.

First of all, it appears to me to, that the metaphysical community has overlooked a development within physics, that actually plays the ball back to the metaphysicists.

When Niels Bohr started discussing quantum physics, what he really threw out of the door was empirical physicism. That is a debate on the material world that is always founded in evidence.

The reason is simple; on the level of the atoms, we cannot use hard evidence, because the scale is so small.

This brings us back to a classical method, where logic and argumentation based on what we do know is the method of progress.

I mean, Bohr had a lot of points, that he only theorised on, he could not prove them.

People seem to accept mr. Bohr, but they do not accept the metaphysics that uses the same method. That is nonsense.

Then I have also realised that we do not understand much of the world. What we do understand, we have put to good use, like the understanding of light, that has given us the radio, cellphones, x-ray and so on. And the understanding of electricity on par with magnetism, that has given us electric motors.

However, still we only scratch the surface of understanding these things. Take light for instance. Light is according to Bohr a particle – wave. In a strange way, we have tiny particles that behave like waves. Like sound waves.

Nevertheless, they are not embedded in any medium. Like sound waves are embedded in air.

This makes no sense. Light must be embedded in something, a medium we cannot see. Some talk about the ether, to me, it makes sense, we need to relive that discussion of the ether that light travels in. Maybe we just have not understood the way the ether is working?

This leads us on to the discussion of G-d. G-d is very much the same as the ether. That is in a medium we cannot sense. But is still there.

See my point? We still do not understand the way light works, and yet we say that something that is close to the understanding of G-d does not exist.

It does not make sense. It is really just the shortcomings of our own logical faculties that stop us.

As I see it, we need to step up in the religious/metaphysical community, right NOW. I must say. I am a bit disappointed about the fact that not one religious community has stepped forward and is ready to fight for G-d. You need to step up. We need to fight for the existence of G-d, and we move now. This is what religion is about, remember?

Then there is some other thing that strikes me, as lacking in the discussion of the physicists.

Anaxagoras, talks a lot about centrifugal power. He highlights the fact, that centrifugal power is obviously prevalent everywhere in the universe. Just look at our earth. It is round, because of centrifugal power. Our world turns around, and hence matter is pushed from the core to the fringes. This is counterbalanced by the power of gravity, that keeps matter assembled.

Two natural powers are working in unison.

You can see the same phenomenon in the galaxies. That is also held together like at a spinning top. It has a centrifugal power hub, and is held together by gravity, making the beautiful spinning motions.

If physicists had centrifugal power at the center of attention as Anaxagoras, a lot of problems would have been solved already. Like the problem of saving energy. We use a lot of rare metals to make whole cities of batteries. Why not use the power of a centrifugal station? We could make a mill with at core of matter that turned around and thereby preserved energy. Sped up by wind power, slowed down when tapped of energy.

There are also several other things that seem strange to me in physics. One thing that does not make sense is the theory, that neutrons and protons are circling a centre, thereby making an atom a specific atom. Gravity does not work on the smallness of the scale we are talking about. Gravity is a natural power that needs a lot of mass to work.

We have to rethink that level of physics. Somethings are not right in the theories of Bohr. He came a long way, but there must be another way it truly works.

Nonetheless, this is my take of metaphysics, at this point of my theoretical discussion. I believe, that G-d is in an ether that surrounds the earth. It is in a medium we cannot see or sense in any way. We can just conclude it is there.

What we know is, that it is around the earth, we do not know that is anywhere else, so far. Because we have not discovered life anywhere else in the universe.

So the spiritual ether can be either only here on earth, typically surrounding earthlike planets, or everywhere in the universe.

What we need to discuss is; how does it work, and consequently, can we prove it further?

G-d bless the willingness to fight for G-d, come on clerics and other, step up, we have to have a comeback.