The congress is scared about one thing; do you Mr. Trump disentangle the democratic process. They have, honest to say, something to put that fear in. The first hundred days were mostly executive orders, and they have not recovered from that yet.

What you experience, is the first backlash after the first hundred days. Now, after the first hundred days, there is a new phase. That is the phase of being presidential. You can get less through, and you need to focus more on foreign policy.

Leave them alone a bit. I do not say, that you should stop the prosecution of the paedophilic rings, on contrary, if it is really true that peadophilia is rampant in some upper class circles, no excuse is enough. It has to be trampled out, as did his eminence pope Francis. It is disgusting, and I have your back the whole way on this issue.

Then there is the discussion on how to be presidential. You have it in you, you proved that at the Poland speech. That was not only a little presidential, it was an amazing feat, worthy some of the best American speeches over the years. You know my stance on the EU, and I really support you here. The EU is no good news.

But back to the art of being presidential. It is like this. The democratic institution is made of three parts. The lower house, the House of Representatives. The upper house, the Senate. The presidential institution, you.

These three parts of the democratic system reflects three parts of the society namely the people (lower house), the aristocracy (the upper house), the king (the president). There is a lot of fancy smancy theories behind this system, but the point that is important for you, is the fact, that you are ideally the king.

That is really all there is about being presidential, you need to act like a king. Now, what would that be then?

A king is, ideally, the servant of the people. He tries to understand the needs of the people, and enact it. But there is more to it, he is also the embodiment of the law. That being, in the case of the US, the constitution. You are supposed to be perfect in your understanding and respect for the law. This is where people are afraid, do you respect the constitution or not.

So in order to win over the House and the Senate, what you need to do, is to study the constitution, reflect on it, and then act from that perspective. For instance, is freedom of speech endangered? Your job is to make sure it does not happen. Is the integrity of the state at danger, fight that danger and so on.

It is not a matter of your way of speaking, it is about the values of the constitution. Do you protect them, no, do your fight for them, in the morning, in foreign policy, in media, in the streets. DO you care for the freedom of the American people. If you do, you will be accepted, nay, hailed as the best president in a long time. Reagan did just that. Stood up for Democracy against Communism. You have your challenges ahead of you, you have to find a way to tackle them, on the sound basis of the best constitution the world has right now; the American Constitution.

G-d bless the United States of America.

A lot of the people that read Rubicon are spiritually searching people. Not people who have all the answers, but people who try to understand what G-d really wants us to do here in our brief time on the planet earth.

We are all sinners to a certain degree, but we are also persons who have a choice in live. Do we want to do good, or do we follow Satan down that seductive path into darkness.

Are we creatures of light or darkness.

As a true believer in the light, I suppose I did try to find that secret path of the light. The path you cannot see, but you know is there. The path where you have to reflect on every step. To see if it is a step of good or bad.

It has lead me, among other things to be believer in Judaism, and the tenets of that ancient creed. But due to some unfortunate occurrences, a lot of persecution and so on, this has been difficult. Living in a practical hideout without many Jews around has been a bit of a nightmare, to be honest.

But, you know, good faith will bring you miracles. Today some of my friends stopped by, and made my Bar Mitzvah. It was pretty awesome, you know being protected by spirit, is not something to take lightly.

So, I feel it was such a momentous experience for me, that I wanted to share it here on Rubicon. You are not introduced to spirit everyday.

Thank you for listening here, and may we all be enlightened by the spirit on each of our journeys.

G-d bless you all.

I have been pretty reluctant to guide mr. Trump, but the world is falling apart, and I need to try and help. The consequences are too dire, we are looking at a possible war with Russia and China combined. The US cannot sustain that. Add to that a rise of IS in Europe, you can imagine the problems of that.

I know, that I was a central advisor for Obama, but we need me in the game again. Otherwise the dangers are too large.

First of all Mr. Trump. You need to get the connection between you and the media all right. There has been a lot of infighting, and that is ok, but the shifting of press secretaries is not good.

My best advise is; do it yourself.

You are so media savvy, that you can easily do it. No problem.

As for Twitter memes, that is just ok. Good to have your own little method to reach the public.

Secondly. You need to get things going with Mr. Putin. I know this is difficult, but look at it this way. If and when the showdown comes with China, you need to be friends with Mr. Putin.

How do you obtain that; you push back on all those infringements and so on that is made in the congress against Mr. Putin. Make it a major point of your presidency.

Thirdly. Make arrangements with India. They are actually on our side, so when we get to the war, WE can be the ones who box in China on two sides.

We should not underestimate China, but we should not overestimate them either.

So there will be a dance around the golden calf in China, and we need to be on top of it.

Luckily the Brits are coming round, just before the show starts. Good for us. Especially if they are able and willing to support us in the war. The Brits have some sophisticated weaponry, and are really good fighters.

But, you need to push back in congress against all that is anti Putin, to make Mr. Putin feel that he has a man in the White house that has his back. He needs to feel that, otherwise he will be angry, and angry Russians are a pretty scary sight.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Well, we are witnessing the great triumph of Zionism these days. We have accomplished peace in the Middle East, more or less. We have made Israel a vehicle for progress, and Israel is at the brink of rebuilding the third temple.

Imagine that, all thanks to the amazing presidentship of Mr. Barack Obama, and his humble servant Asger.

At such a momentous moment, it is perhaps time to look a little back in time, and discuss a bit where Zionism came from, how it evolved and ultimately has triumphed, in a positive sense.

Denmark had a pretty prominent role in the development. Mr. George Brandes was a Danish philosopher who was leading in his time, and supported the project and through him a lot of the humanistic ballast that Mr. Herzl realized was induced into the Zionist idea.

Over time, the Danish angle has been for good or worse. We must admit that the Oslo accords failed. It was, among others, driven by Mr. Herbert Pundik, another Danish humanist. But the Brandes way ultimately succeeded with the work Barack and I did.

The success can also be seen in the support that Israel enjoys by Jews around the world. Very few Jews is against. Off cause we disagree, but the need for a strong Israel is felt by all Jews. If we succeed in building the temple, I think the gamble was right.

Thus Zionism lives and continues to work despite all the dangers that it meets. It is a brilliant success among so many catastrophes, lately the Shoa, the Holocaust. We can maintain that success for eternity, if we hold onto the faith that Mr. Herzl and Brandes prophesied.

That of a nation state made for the Jews. A home all Jews could reach, a home that would put great barriers between the Jews and all who wish to destroy the Jews. A home in Jerusalem.

Not only that, but also a state that could bring light and joy to those around it. Support the great ancient cultures that it is embedded in.

Perhaps realize the ancient dream of a rebounded Middle East.

That is truly a feat done by Mr. Barack Obama, and I truly hope that he gets the credit for it.

G-d bless the will to repeat the great work of Herzl and Brandes in these times as well.

There is some trouble brewing in the Middle East, especially around the Temple mount. The “Palestinians” wish to enforce the guilt of the Jews, and try to provoke a response.

At the heart of this matter lies the choice of the Christians the Jews and the Muslims. What do we want?

We can chose to find peace, or we can chose to fight each other. Why do we continue to chose to fight each other?

It is because we are often wrapped up in our feelings and immediate urge for action. We feel wronged and remember this and that wrongdoing.

This is a choice we can do, do we follow that feeling, or do we try and emancipate ourselves from the immediate reaction, and be a little realistic about the challenges we meet.

Instead of going on with the rush of emotion, we can take a little step back and try to seriously appraise the situation.

The Middle East has a lot to give the entire world, and a lot of the ideas that has been developed in the Middle East are still very active in the world.

I see Israels role as a tool to recreate a spiritual as well as an political turn around for the Middle East.

We got far Barack and I, and we need to build on that frame.

But if we rush in on the emotions of the Palestinians, we miss the bigger picture, that is that of the return of honour not only to the Muslims, but to the entirety of the Middle East, the birth cradle of man.

G-d bless the peace we can find.

Here in the West, we have decided that there is no such thing as spirit or magic. These things have been enlightened away, and we believe only what we can appraise with our senses.

What if we are wrong? What if there is such a thing as G-d or spirit. What if magic really exists, and the whole world of spiritual thought is in effect?

I truly believe, that there is such a thing as G-d, and I live in a world where there is magical creatures, spiritual entities and a life after this.

This is brought to me on a purely rational basis. I do not believe in anything I have not experienced myself. Coming from a scientific world, rationality is what I have been brought up with. I have used these tools to try and understand what we commonly know as metaphysics. That is the scientific discovery of spirituality. A science as all others, with the same demands to scientific methodology and scrutiny as any other science. In fact, I believe that metaphysics demands a higher level of scientific inquiry than humanistics, since it rests on a purely argumentative, theoretical basis. It goes from thesis to thesis through a rigorous dialogue and based on proven arguments. In fact metaphysics has more in common wit its scientific brother physics than human science.

It is the rigourous method that gives it its claim to scientific fame.

For a long time I wanted to go to Oxford to prove my theories. I did that in fact, due to the helping hand of rev. Justin Welby. But I realized, that that did not change science that much. Oxford welcomed me, and I was truly honored.

But the realm of metaphysics, is actually stronger in Denmark than in the UK, with all respect.

That is because of the Niels Bohr institute.

Due to a lot of fighting I had in Copenhagen, i missed a golden opportunity to make a cooperation with the institute I realize now in hindsight.

To truly make that bridge between metaphysics and physics, I need to talk to the amazing scientists at Niels Bohr institute. If this is the result of my recent comeback in Danish intellectuality, then that is the most important.

Because G-d is alive, and not recognizing this, will take all the will we have to do good and leave us without a mover. Without the immovable mover, as Aristotle defines G-d.

G-d bless the will to do good.

Israel as a force of good has actually materialized itself in these days. I know, that there is a lot of discussion regarding the issues of the Temple Mount. But, seriously, if the saudis are actually supporting a peaceful solution, we are one step from actually rebuilding the temple itself.

What will a rebuilding of the temple require? According to the venerable rav Ashlag, it will require a common foundation of all three monotheistic religions. That is Islam, Judaism and Christianity. All should share the same basic religious ideas.

When that comes, the Temple Mount will be more than just a temple for Judaism. It will be a foundation for all three religions that come from Abraham.

This is what the current row is about. Can we make the temple or not.

As a metaphysician, it is obvious to me, that the differences between any man are just something we men made. Spirit or G-d never wanted that. It wanted us to be like it.

In this spirit the temple should be built. As a reflection of G-d, not us imperfect humans.

G-d bless the realization of what G-d wants.

If we look at the world, most of it still runs in the direction Barack and I planned. This is not to diminish Mr. Trump. He has been doing quite well internationally, and should be respected for that. 

But simply to try and understand what is going on in the world right now. When Barack and I started the peace effort in the Middle East. Everything was in shambles and everybody was fighting everybody. Now, there is peace. The last little nugget of true atrocities were finished, more or less, with the fall of Mosul. Thank you again Mattis, very well done. 

In the US, the economy is still in very high gear, and Mr. Trump is still using the ideas Barack and I had. He uses them more forcefully, but he still uses the basic ideas. So in a way, we all live inside of my head. 

I noticed this condition of the world, when there are great minds that make something of the world. Like Tesla, Thoreau, Newton or Steve Jobs.

It all comes down to the character of the idealist or philosopher. The world we create is a reflection of our own character. 

Like Newton. Newton was truly a terrible man. He hated people, and he was very cynical. The world he left us, that of industrialization, was cold and unrepenting. 

Niels Bohr, who oversaw the making of the atomic bomb was a very nice person. So even though he made the bomb, he also left us a world where we actually never used it, on his command. Imagine that. 

With the current crisis in the Democratic Party, please have a look at what Barack and I have done. It HAS changed the world to something else. It reflects our stance on ethics and life. When I was younger, I was more revolutionary. Today as I have matured, I am more inclusive. 

The first phase of my work is what we witness in Europe now. For better or worse, it will go down in a revolution. But that suits the Europeans the best.

In the US however, the depth of what Barack and I have done, is still not realized. 

We made, here it comes, so pay attention: CHANGE, right. 

That change was a true shift away from the Alinsky paradigm to a Trier paradigm. Where Alinsky was for minorities and truly a Frankfurterschool adherent, what Barack and I have done is much more broad and sound. 

We went back to Hegel, fixed the flaws of Marx, installed a whole new economic paradigm, made peace in the Middle East, brushed off the ideas of Democracy. 

In a sense, we made a whole new Social-Democratic paradigm. A more sound one. A deeper one, and we still have not realized this in the Democratic Party. 

We DID make a turn around, we fulfilled the promise, and we should build on the platform. 

G-d bless the will to be strong in our faith. 

I know that we are a little depressed now. Things seem to fall apart, and there is very little hope. 

In this situation we could perhaps look at the victories we have had, and learn from them. First of all, the Obama administration was a resounding success. We did it. 

There has been little criticism of what we did. We did it by trying to find new ways for Social-democratic ideas. And we succeeded. 

What did we do right? We reinterpretated the ideas of socialism and democracy. 

Socialism was brought to a much more spiritual place, and we tried to ally ourselves with business instead of alienating ourselves. 

In practice a middle leaning political platform. 

In the field of democracy, we went full tilt. We fought for the arabs in the Arab spring, and we tried to fight for democracy in the face of Islamic state. 

This created a huge league for democracy that Mr. Trump has inherited and managed to strengthen. 

The strength of the foreign policy ideas is evident in the fact that Mr. Trump continues to reap the benefit of it. 

He has managed to continue and does it really well. 

So we did do a turn around, but we still lost the election. 

What we can do however, is to continue the reflection in the issues. 

Healthcare is better if it is served with a community spirit, right ?

What is the meaning of healthcare if it is not to help people in need?

So on and so forth. Again let mr. Zuckerberg pay me a ticket, I can get the discussiongroups started. 

Do not lose hope, do not despair. We can do it. 

G-d bless the will to remain strong in spirit and community. 

With the continuing focus on the negative aspects of the Trump administration, I believe we are missing the opportunity to discuss what really went wrong with our own campaign. 

I believe that I am pretty good at campaigning. I just won with May in the U.K., but we still haven’t figured out what went wrong in the American election. Pointing the finger at Mr. Putin doesn’t help us really. 

I believe that there is a basic reason we may have overlooked. We went too far away from the center. 

Even though ms. Clinton did reach for the center in her politics, her political career and some of the players she brought along were not centrist. Among them Huma Abedin. 

And then there is the fact that the electorate likes to change from time to time. Try something new. 

That has nothing to do with the performance of the party leadership. That is just a part of the mechanic. 

We have had a democratic leader with a rather conservative politics, but still he was colored in his skin. That was a big leap for many Americans. Having a female president was just too much. 

Americans do not like to experiment just too much. 

So they chose the closest they could get to the normal white couple. 

My point is. What we should consider are these macro developments that has little to do with the platform we are running on. I mean Mr. Trump is very much continuing with the ideas that Barack and I came up with. 

So soul searching is not just about criticizing the opponent in politics. It is also understanding the macromovements. 

Mr. Biden we could have won with, because he was the “normal” choice. 

G-d bless the will to have the ability to learn from our mistakes. 

People from the U.S. usually feel that they do not understand Russians much. That is quite normal considering the historical rivalry and fighting between the two great nations. 

But, seen from a Danish perspective things might not be so different after all. Please let me explain what the Russians are, and how they ended up being who they are. 

Russians or “Rus” came from the Scandinavian peninsula a thousand years ago. At that time it was quite the rave to go to the Byzantine empire to serve as bodyguards of the Byzantine emperor. We Vikings were, rightfully I might add, seen as the best fighters, so the emperor wanted a hird of our good men. 

Many came home with very beautiful clothes and a lot of riches. 

This was alproximately at the same time as Denmark and England was under the same king, that of Canute.

The route down to the Byzantine empire was along the rivers of Europe. So we sailed in our longboats down the rivers, and we noticed some nice arable land along the route. 

Especially in Ukraine, there was a lot of nice land, so we decided to settle there. In the beginning it went quite well, but that all changed at the time of the Hun invasion. 

The Huns were extremely savage. They burned down whole peoples and they, more or less, destroyed the Viking cities in Ukraine. 

Imagine that. You live happily in your land, as the Americans do now, all of a sudden a vile conqueror decend on all your peaceful cities and burn them to the ground, rapes all your daughters, kill you indescriminately. 

This really changed the Russians, in fact the Russians never truly got over that abuse. This is why Russians are so sceptical towards foreign powers who try to impose their will on them and have this deeply ingrained suspicion towards conquerors. 

It has served then well many times. Russians single handedly took out Napoleon and Hitler. Imagine that. 

Do not wake the Russian bear they say. In other words, Russians always are ready to fight to the bitter end. They know that there is no depth to human depravity, and will fight rather than surrender. 

But they still remember where they come from, and the good things we develop here in Europe, they learn from and try to use to the best of their ability. 

Like the rise of spirituality that I have been a part of. 

So in fact Russians are like Americans. They have had their frontiertime, their longing for their roots. But they are just an older wave of migrants, and they are wiser to the evils of the world. 

But deep down Russians are as freedomloving, proud warriors. I might add with a great warm heart. 

Mr. Putin is of a generation that look upon Europe for good things, he is not a generation that wants war. In fact he just wants to be left in peace. 

G-d bless the peace we CAN find. 

In Egypt, there is a rise in anti Christian sentiment. Especially the Copts, who is an ancient Christian group of worship has been hit hard. 

The current government of Al-Sisi tries it best to protect the Copts, but the problems persists. Especially ISIS related gangs seems to be targeting the poor Copts with suicide bombers and the like. 

It may seem a little far off, but terror attacks we experience here in Europe and in the US is far worse for the Copts. 

Let us not forget, that the Copts is an ancient church, that has been instrumental in many amazing feats of development of Christian thought. It still retains some of the most sacred Christian sites, among them the place where Moses was found. 

Connecting to the Copts has been a boon to the Catholic faith, and will continue so. 

The Copts are a sign, that the Middle East is actually a place where Muslims and Christians can live side by side. A project mr. Al-Sisi, thank you great pharao, has tried to make. 

Why? Because otherwise the endless cycle of violence will eventually pit all Muslims or at least Sunni Muslims against the rest of the world. 

In this case, I believe that Mr. Al-Sisi has a crucial role to play. But he can only do that if we really get behind him, and support him for his crucial role in the development of a peace. 

Please support his protection of the Copts, they are a wondrous people, wrought with disaster, but still holding on to the dignity of their faith. 

We can learn a lot from them, and we should support them, and all the rest of the persecuted Christians in the Middle East. 

G-d bless the peace we CAN find.

You know, I am really amazed at the performance Mr. Trump did in Poland. Seriously, hands down, that was a class act. No doubt about it. You just hit all the right buttons, in a balanced, supportive, avant-garde speech that will go down in history as the first move of an American president in the war against ISIS in Europe. This is the horn blowing of a real leader. 

I never saw it coming, it was that amazing. 

I ran against mr. Trump, then he asked me to guide him, I have done that to the best of my ability, and the thing is, it is working quite well. 

The fight with China is all but prepared, mentally as well as military tech wise. The fight with ISIS in Europe is ready. Everything is in the finest order. 

When I think about all those years back when I started the work first with the resistance here in Denmark, then with Barack, I intuitively knew that we would make to here. I never really doubted it. I just knew it in my bones. When there is trouble on our doorstep we have this ability we of the Vikings, to look for the best, and let him lead us. 

It is one of the secrets why we have survived, we have this deeply ingrained way of organizing ourselves, across political differences, across nations, just doing the wisest thing. 

Now we are here, at the dawn of the fight. 

Let us pray. 

Dear G-d. 

Please let the mourning that will come be light. Please let the bloodletting be scarce. Please let all the fighting be done with the best possible and most humane end in mind. Never let us fight for money, but for that of freedom. 

Please attend our needs, secure our borders, help those who are weak, black as well as white. 

Do not pressure yourself on us because we are in need, but because we wish to let your will be done. 

Please, let this fighting be as mild as humanly possible. 

Let our league be strong and let us stop the bickering. 

Please, when it all ends, let the peace be everlasting. 

Thank you, and let us all say Amen. 

I really fought for Ms. Clinton in the last American election. I was, all in all, one of the prime strategic advisers Ms. Clinton had. 

When we lost, I kind of lost my own swagger, it was the first election I have ever lost, and it was the fifth one I had had a part in. I won with Barack four years earlier. But that is the way it is. You win some and you lose some. I won with the conservatives in U.K., though only slightly. 

But that is how democracy works, it is the will of the people, and sometimes you are not the one the people wants. It can change again. 

But to blame the loss of the election on Mr. Putin because he manipulated is truly wrong. I must know, I have a friendship with Mr. Putin of sorts. 

Yes he is a an ex. KGB spy, yes his friends are KGB, but that does not imply that Kremlin still attacks the US with disinformation campaigns. 

I know what a disinformation campaign looks like, I have just fought one down in Denmark. 

The American election does not wear the signs of a disinformation campaign. 

Now Mr. Putin is a vile fox, he is a fighter and he does use techniques of clouding his actions. But he also a person who has taken his country from a Communist rule to that of a Christianity. 

When he points to the Jews as their, or our, experience as scapegoats. He is right. 

I hereby extent the support of the Jews to Mr. Putin. If you feel like one us, you will have our support. 

G-d bless mother Russia. 

Great literature usually carries a claim to formulate what is not conscious. The subconscious truths that we all agree upon, but are not ready to speak openly about. 

You can shine with the light of the moon or the light of the sun. The moonlight is usually the light of great novels. The philosopher however must be the one who are able to formulate the unconscious like the sun. Openly, brazenly and therefor with the strongest of power. 

There has been a proverb of the Trump administration, and especially Mr. Bannon; “winter is coming” the saying goes. 

It is a reference to the motto of the Starks of Winterfell in the saga of George R.R. Martin in Game of Thrones.

I have wondered about that reference, it is so strong. When I was a kid, the stories really enraptured me with the strength of characters, the depth of storyline. But I did not understand the subconscious reference of that giant wall that Martins were talking about, the monsters seeping through the cracks, the corruption of the city in the middle, and Jon Snow, the orphan trying to stop the wall from crumbling. 

Well since Martins is British, it seems to me, that the wall is the crumbling borders, the monsters the migrants and the corrupt center Bruxelles. 

Winter is coming, and there is some truth in that, and not unless we realize that and plan accordingly do we man that wall truly, or rather look at things in a clear light. 

Literature has that gift sometimes, to arm us with truth. 

Not all migrants are monsters, but some are, and we need to man that wall in order to stop the flow of monsters. 

But we also need to man the inner walls, the Millwals and be brave. 

G-d bless the vigilant. 

I have been neglecting the US for some time here on Rubicon, mostly because I have been really busy with Denmark and the UK. 

Put on hold but certainly not forgotten. Anyway, I hope that some of the things that is developed for the UK, can be used in the US as well. 

There is the question of the next generation of Democratic leaders. It is a little difficult for me to really follow the trends there. I am basically too far away, but, as always, I do my best. 

I have been thinking a lot about mr. Mark Zuckerberg. I can relate a lot to Mark. We have very much the same background. Both grew up in secular more or less Jewish family, IT, and the succes we have had with each our professions. 

Here are my recommendations. First of all. Politics is so tough. Much tougher than you would imagine. There is a lot of tactics, you have to be realistic about the pressure it puts on you and your family. 

But, that is what it demands. At the other hand, it gives you an opportunity to really make a difference. It is also much more challenging than IT. 

Not that IT is not challenging, it is, and MUCH better payed. But the skills you need to fight in politics are different. You need to be a fighter, have a superior character, have depth of knowledge, be a very good and loyal friend, and then you need to feel the burning desire to make a better world. 

Anyway Mark, my door is always open. Invite me to your house, or pop by. I would like to help you, as all the other contenders. You may have to pay the ticket for the US however, considering the low pay of bloggers these days.

The US in general is in a much better position than ten years ago, and we will manage. 

G-d bless the US of A.

To truly understand the depth the change that we may be able to carry forward in the UK, one needs to understand the problems that we are facing. 

The socialist doctrine of free movement and free everything is not a viable way forward. 

What is viable however, is to understand what the shortfalls of said system has, and then remedy where it is not working and find a new way. 

Ok. Have a look at it this way. Nobody really knows what socialism is. The only ones who truly had an idea about it, were the first socialists around Karl Marx and perhaps the first generation around Lenin. Why? Because Marx wrote in a typical German way, which is almost impossible to understand. 

Being Danish, and that is what people call very German in many ways, I do understand it to a certain degree. But only after checking the sources of Marx do I really understand it, and then also the problems of Marxist thinking. 

Here it comes. Marx made a replica of Sparta, or rather he was very inspired by Sparta. 

There is however one problem. Marx did understand the classical sources, but he never went into absolute nerd with the old texts. He has read Lucretius, a bit of Plato, but not all the texts that describes Sparta, and not all the texts that describes Athens, the Democratic counterweight to Sparta. 

So he missed quite a few things. What he really missed are the following:

1. According to Lucretius a communist society needs to be closed, not open. This is important to know when we talk wealthfarestate. This is why EU does not work for countries like Denmark, it simply ruins the wealthfarestate. 

2. Sparta had checks and balances internally in Sparta. There were two kings, and there was a council called the Ephors, who advised the king. This is important to understand in the light of the communist states that evolved into corrupt kingdoms. A socialist system will not work unless there is a check on the power. 

3. Sparta had gods and goddesses as any other polis of the time. They had a fervor for law, almost as a G-d. 

Now, there was a lot of criticism of Sparta in the days it actually worked, something we can learn from today. First and foremost, it was criticized for being too insulate. That was why it eventually died out. Spartans had too few children. Why? Because basically there was no meaning in having children. The state took them over anyway. The same problem is very true for the socialist or communists countries of today. Especially in Western Europe, where the wealthfarestates have had a tremendous decline in birthrate. It is not because people are generally full of weltschmerz, but because the system makes it like that. 

If you do not have a wealthfarestate, then people have more children, because then the family becomes the social security. 

The other thing that was a huge problem in the antiques, was the Crypteia, the secret police of Sparta. It was loathed, and it was used to dominate and tyrranize the helots, the slaves of the Spartans. 

The same problem is prevalent in the modern socialist systems, it creates an incentive for a huge secret service, and ends up being policestates. 

With all of this in mind, we can see, that there is room for a Spartan like society, they were extremely brave and were generally seen as uncorrupted and really good fighters. 

But we need to be careful not to make the same mistakes as the ancient Spartans did, and we need to make sure we do not simply make the same mistakes as the last generations of communists did. 

This means, as a conclusion, that we need to make a wealthfarestate, but run on spiritual, national principles. We also need to secure that the legislative system retains its checks and balances when it comes to the use and control of power. The democratic system needs to be the foundation. All the other principles of state; the rule of law, enlightenment by the press and so on, needs to be supported and encouraged as well. 

THEN we can have a wealthfarestate, that actually works and supports the society and system. 

That will bring a better society. 

G-d bless the will to make a better world.

The election, and the fall out of the drama, is finally over. 

It is time to wrap it up, and talk a little about the potential political growth that we realized in the election. 

First of all, we need to do other things than just Brexit. Yes it is a humongous task, but focusing only on that, will potentially cost us the next election. We need to do a multipronged strategy. 

One of the great things in the election, was the talk about the NHS and the wealthfarestate in general. I know, that communism was spread by the KGB, we have just have a rerun on some of the methods here in Denmark. But communism has good things in it as well. 

The best being a kind of state security wrapped around all members of the society. 

This we HAVE to work on. Someone should convene in Oxford, invite rev. Brian Mountford and talk about the Anglican Church and its role as a moral base under the wealthfarestate. Talk about the caring for the weakest of the nation, talking about doctors, teachers, policemen and all that support the nation. 

This will give the Anglican Church a way to be a part of the society again in an important way. 

There should be space for other beliefsystems, but the church should be leading in this process. 

A good task for a vicars daughter. 

Secondly, we need to work on terrror. I know that it is both sides and so on. But the best way to stop terror, is to get rid of the jihadis. Then the right wing will stop. 

There has been talk about internment of islamists. I think this is too harsh. Locking them up will stop the problem, but they are young people, with a life ahead of them. They should not be locked up. What I would recommend, is repatriation. Most of them are not citizens of the UK, so they should be asked to leave the country, and if that is not possible, forced to leave. 

This will make a situation where the UK has to negotiate with different countries to take their citizens back. Well, that is possible, that is basically a matter of will and ability to negotiate. 

A good project for an ambitious conservative. Deliver on this, and that is a huge boon to the party.

Thirdly, there is Brexit. As I see it, the real challenge lies in satisfying DUP. They will not accept any kind of soft Brexit, and they are pretty fond of Mr. Farage. The negotiations on the EU side are really unrealistic, and they are not holding the cards. Drive a serious bargain, and if they do not comply, just define the rules yourself. 

G-d bless the UK, and thank you for a good fight. We won, but it was pretty close this time.

The endless cycle of war has finally begun in the UK. That of attack and retaliation. This is how war works. 

If the one side keeps attacking, and no one answers, in the end someone will do it in a primitive way. 

As the conflict unfolds, people will be forced to choose sides. This is what we know from Thucydides, a war will eventually pit people against each other. That goes for the muslim as well for the democratic side. 

In this situation, the state needs to up its game. If it does not deliver on the war on terror, people will just take the matters in their own hands. Condemning it will not do anything, people are too angered to care about condemnation. This is war, no words will change it. It is a hot war, not a cold War, so it is not a spywar. 

The only responsible thing to do in this situation, is to go hard, VERY hard on the terrorists. That is IS afiliated organizations and the like. Close down the mosques, and untangle the vast network of Islamist terrorists.

It may sound as a callous response to the Finsbury mosque attack. And yes, those Muslims that were there by chance are not necessarily Islamist, and for those, it was wrong to target them. Just as wrong as killing innocent Londoners. 

My point is just, that the state is loosing control over the situation, and the only way it can regain control, is by closing all the terrorist mosques, repatriate all who are terrorist and not citizens and so on. 

The lack of action on the part of the government is the cause of this situation. 

If the security forces do not step in and do something, the situation will spiral out of control. 

That is how humans think and work, and we should understand it and try to take the initiative instead of leaving it to the street. Because that is a dangerous situation indeed. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom, and may it prevail in these very difficult times. 

There has been a lot of discussion on the Wealtfarestate and the problems this part of the country is in. 

Let me clear, more money is not the answer. Already it is extremely expensive. What will work however, is the ATTITUDE towards the wealthfarestate. 

The basic problem with the wealthfarestate is firstly a widespread demoralization. Secondly it is the priority. The wealthfarestate is, in principle, for all. But in a society where all needs more and more. One needs to prioritize. 

The prioritization needs to be founded in something. 

The philosophical challenge to the current socialist wealthfarestate, is that it does not make sense. 

Marx idea was to copy the principles of Sparta. But he did not understand Sparta, and he did not respect the sage wisdom of the founder of Sparta, Lycurgus. 

Lycurgus was quite clear about the constitution of Sparta. It was to make Sparta a completely closed state. Because he knew, that an open state could not carry the community. 

Sparta was also extremely ideological, it was FOR law. So it did have virtue as a basic motor. 

If we look at the current wealthfarestate with this in mind. We can see that in order to make it work we need two things;

1. A principle to drive it.

2. A realistic set of borders to guard the frame of the wealthfarestate. 

My idea, written in the book ‘The Freestate’, is to go back to the principle that Marx left, that of Hegel. To Hegel a nation was inspired by the grace of spirit. ‘Gott mitt uns’ as the saying was in Germany. This works. We can see it in hospitals where doctors work for the grace of goodness and spirit. We can see it in the schools, where good teachers has a calling. We can see it in the way a spiritual system PRIORITIZES the resources. It goes to the ones who needs it the most. 

This should be the guiding star of a renewed discussion on wealthfare. Who needs it. And lest not forget. Help is only good, if it makes the person that get the help selfreliant. 

As the venerable Pope Francis said. The communists stole the flag of the church. Well, let us steal it back. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom, and may it prevail in these difficult times.      

As the conflicts with the islamists are on the rise, the measures to use against them must meet the challenge they pose. 

If it is truly is an act of terrorism burning down the sky scraper of London, well, the true horror of the foe is fully revealed. We saw it in Syria with the Yazidi girls, Christians being persecuted and other atrocities. But we are not that used to it in our own homes. 

What we did see however, were the sheer and incredible bravery of the firefighters. Such resilience in a dangerous situation. Conflict brings both the worst and the best up in us. 

There will be more, but we will NOT sheer away from trouble. We will meet it, again and again as the heroes we are when we meet such incredible danger. 

We will never surrender, never. 

G-d bless the city of London, and may it prevail in such difficult times. 

Now, there is a hung parliament. This is very unusual for British politics, but in Denmark, this is the way it works. 

It is like this. A PM for a coalition, will have to serve the entire coalition. That is really the difficult thing. Because a PM from one party has to include the most important parts of other parties as well. This craves an extremely competent politician, the PM has to be extremely good at making all parts of the coalition happy.

The trick is to take the best qualities of each party, and strengthen them. Add to this, a look on where the common interest is, and then you make an alliance. 

It is fair enough if you cannot get everything through in a hung parliament, because the votes are not there for it. 

In the case with the cooperation between DUP and the Tories, the common ground is pretty obvious. Hard Brexit, security, and a common interest in strengthening the British Union. 

Since DUP is more conservative than the Tories, they will, as a consequence draw the Tories to the right. This has a lot of implications for the Brexit talk, the cat is already out of the bag, as we see it. 

The way forward would be, to sit down and make a new deal with DUP on Brexit, and see where that will get the negotiation. By mathematical logic, it will mean at much harder Brexit than the one David Davies wanted to negotiate. But that is the way with a hung parliament, parties need to feel they get a part of the negotiations in relations to their size. 

Tories is the big party, but in order to compromise, DUP needs to get a few things in as well. 

It can be done, but it will require a lot of discussion to find a solution. 

At the end of the day, a good compromise could be to accept the open borders in Ireland and then go for harder borders to France. That would probably satisfy DUP. 

The great question is; what about the EU citizens in the UK. But not only that, what about all the foreigners in the UK.

In a difficult security situation, one needs to be sure that the citizens in the country are actually loyal to the system. The amount of serious malcontents are very high, and as a consequence these malcontents needs to go back to their own country. This will be the end of the matter. I know that it will be difficult to set in motion now. But the mechanics of war will eventually lead to that result if we want it or not. That is the wisdom of Thucydides, the classic Athenian historian. 

So, in order to prepare for the next few years, we need to get the Brexit talks over as fast as possible, and then start tackling the terror as fast as possible. 

If we get control over the borders, we then have a chance at actually securing the process to happen orderly and done by the state. 

Difficult times indeed, but we CAN do it. 

G-d bless Ms. May, and may she prevail.

Ok, here a fortnight after the election, things seem to have unfurled more or less the way I saw it. The DUP is much more conservative than the conservatives, and draws the Tories to the right.

It is not good if this means control of gays, abortion and so on. But as a staunch supporter of a hard Brexit and a supporter of a serious crackdown on the islamists, this is good news.

In fact the position of Ms. May has actually improved considerably, because she can now point to the DUP when the backbenchers call for less pressure.

In fact, it has strengthened Ms. May overall. Yes, there is little tradition for a hung government in the UK, but in this strange coincidence, it is actually not that bad.

If we start crunching the numbers, we also see, that actually what happened was, that the UKIPers failed, not May. She got MORE votes overall than Cameron. I mean, how can that possible be a loss?

The problem was for the Conservatives, that UKIP votes were abandoning the cause in droves. This released a lot of the old Labourvotes back to Labour. So all the hoolabaloo about young voters and so is just that hoolabaloo. The real reason for the Labour turnaround was the UKIP collapse.

Mr. Farage made a huge mistake in losing the reins too early. It also tell the Tories, that a good UKIP in the race will, by mathematics, not mean an increased UKIP number of MP but Tory MPs. Strange world we are living in.

So by celestial providence, the power ended up where it was intended in the first place; in a place where Westminster has to work for a hard Brexit.

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

There has been much discussion on the manifesto, and the how’s and why’s of this election vehicle. 

I tend to agree, as probably all have, that it wasn’t that great of a paper to work from. It seems to me, that the Tory leadership was so fixed on Brexit, that they forgot about all the other challenges that is in for the country. 

There are many, and I believe that Ms. May will have to do a multi pronged strategy. Working on a lot of issues at once; migration, border control, Brexit, terrorattacks, remodeling of the wealthfarestate, economics, education and family strengthening. 

Anyway there is a lot to do, but the good news is, if you follow the ideas I have, there is an integrated system in it. It is not made without regards to the strategy and architecture of political development. Everything is thought through, is based on an intimate knowledge of political principles, from the classical times to today. 

There is only one little thing I may be worrying about; why didn’t the writers of the manifesto know about the intricacies of economics that David Cameron introduced in his tenure. 

There is a lack of learning in the political establishment that is dangerous. 

I think it is because my books have not been made readily available to the academics. They should, in order to enable them to make good policies. It is philosophy and maybe a bit winded, but any serious political development should be based on solid theory in my opinion. I will try and contact Oxford and see if I can get someone to publish the theory, because I believe it is of vital importance. The mistake of the manifesto shows this. 

For me it is not about the honour. I am fiercely independent, and prefer working outside the system. But the system has a role to play with an independent philosopher as me. Maybe not to hire me, in fact I would make a lousy professor, but to educate the academics in the theory I provide. It is truly needed.

Apart from that, well done everybody. It was a last minute, desperate fight, but we did it. 

We also need to applause UKIP, they selflessly gave us room. They practically bought the Tory win by sacrificing themselves. That is rare in any political fight. I have never seen it before, and we really need to pay respect to that sacrifice and listen to their input. 

All in all, a fierce battle, but we won. 

G-d bless the victory we got, and then let us be humble about it, and reach out for a broad coalition.

There is a rising interest in a cooperation between the right and the left of the aisle on different issues. The main being, if we actually listen to the constituency, the dismantling of the wealthfarestate. 

It is not necessarily in the historic interest of the Tories to dismantle the wealthfarestate, there has been a tradition for a certain responsibility from the government towards especially struggling people, after all Mr. Churchill was the one to initiate the wealthfarestate.

It is not up to me to decide, but I can contribute with a theoretical examination of the problems of the current political landscape. 
My first impression of National socialism was by talking to one of my heroes in the resistance movement. My good friend Per, Alias Tom had a lot of knowledge about National socialism, since he fought the bastards. 

He said that Nation socialism was the strongest political system he knew. The point being, that if you do socialism in a national frame, the stability is extremely strong. You can actually see this in North Korea which in practice is National socialism, since the socialistic system there is extremely closed and concerned with borders. 

If you have a look at international socialism, that is the basis of EU, you have a complete different picture. This is not working, and never has. 

Because in order to have a communal state, where everybody shares everything, you need a high degree of control, absolute control in fact. 

Now, we have returned to a classic socialistic ideology with Mr. Corbyn. he calls for a state that controls certain parts of the intercommunal live. Education, social wealthfare and so on. 

The discussion has been a bit superficial, because where does that leave the Brexit discussion. If the Socialists want free movement, then there will be no free education and so on. 

The problems, seen from a Socialist perspective is, that Marx defined Communism as international, and therefor most socialist are not that keen on accepting a national socialism. 

But however you turn it around, it does work with international socialism, it has been tested and it did not work. 

This puts Ms. May at an ideal negotiation position in relation to the wealtfarestate negotiations, because I suppose these have to be initiated, we have to listen and serve the people. 

Because May has no problem with a national agenda, on contrary she supports it, and with DUP on board, the patriotic position is strengthened. 

She can deliver a wealthfarestate that actually works. 

She can do that, by stopping the open borders, stop all the abuse of the wealthfarestate by certain parts of the migrant community, fight for more working jobs and make those jobs British. Mr. Cameron had a lot of succes with that. 

It all comes back to the community. I happen to believe, that that community should be based on more than just complete random relations. A community is to me, and perhaps to Theresa May, something more, in fact it is, if it is good, a spiritual thing. 

Perhaps this idea could base the community we are talking about, a community where the cooperation is based on more than the simple material needs, and then in a Hegelian way Spirit. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom. 

Well, well, well, who would have though that. A hung parliament, and the pollsters, once again, had it all wrong.

Anyway. If we look at the issues discussed and the outcome, this was a very difficult election, not at least because there were two terror attacks in the midst of it.

This skewered the whole election, because the momentum that Ms. May needed was destroyed over and over again. In that sense the terrorist did at least win by setting the agenda.

Instead of talking Brexit we ended up talking security and austerity, two issues that are actually not handled that well by Ms. May.

I am not here to point fingers, but to try, honestly, to analyse what happened.

As the result is ticking in, we see that the Tories are dependent on Ireland, this is interesting, and we will see what that leads to. But since the DUP are hardcore Brexiteers, that would actually mean a HARDER Brexit strategy than what Ms. May started with. That is also interesting, none saw that coming.

The overall picture however is, that people do want Brexit, you can see that in Scotland, where the independence movement has receded and in Ireland as well.

In fact, that has strengthened the Brexit narrative quite a lot.

One thing however that should be abundantly clear however is the fact, that the austerity measures that the German EU pressed for are not viable anymore. Austerity has to be softened and less deconstruction of the scrambling wealthfarestate should be done.

At the end of the day, people want a patriotic Britain with a strong wealthfarestate. That is the message that the people are trying to get through to the politicians.

In fact, that is not a repeal of the current Brexit course, because a strong wealthfarestate is not possible within the EU. So if Labour wants to cling on to the straw that has been made available, campaigning for a soft Brexit will go against the will of the people.

Interesting indeed, as the politicians get on with the analysis, as I presume they will over the next couple of days, a more clear picture will emerge, and that picture will be, that we have a vote of nation socialism. Not Nazism, but a wealthfarestate within a sovereign nation. That was unexpected.

G-d bless the United Kingdom and may we find our way.

There has been a lot of discussion on the current development, and that the UK treads new ground. Tackling the islamists is perhaps difficult, and how will it end and so on. 

Just to be clear on this, since it is basically my ideas we are working with. There is absolutely nothing new in the ideas as such, all is based on well proven philosophy, that stems from the Athenian philosopher Aristotle. The combination is off cause new, since Islam did not exist in the times of Aristotle, but the principles of Democracy and how it relates to threats are the same. 

Add to this, the strategy has been well tested, on the battle field in the Middle East. Here it has brought wonders I never dreamed about. After Mr. Trump has toured the Middle East, thank you Mr. Trump, even the Arabs are actively chipping in, pushing Quatar out of the alliance since Quatar is the main sponsor of radicalism. 

This means, in practice, that there will be no significant international backlash if a serious effort to trample down ISIS and likeminded organizations is done. On the contrary, it will be seen as a significant push for the alliance. 

On the ground we have also some serious experience with fighting ISIS. They are good, even brilliant in their use of the very limited resources they have. We should not understimate them. They are inventive, versatile, creative, dedicated and truly believe in their cause. 

We are, at the other hand, demoralized, fat and absolutely ruined by the Cold War. The political correctness has been eating us up, and we are almost without any faith in anything. 

So it is truly a David and Goliath fight, problem is, WE are the Goliath.

But we need to turn that boat around, and reinvent ourselves. Get healthy and sound again. 

We are at the end of the river at the heart of Darkness, and Mr. Kurz is wispering; we are all going to die. 

Turning the boat around, and leaving that Heart of Darkness, and fight our way up of the river is going to be tough. But there is no choice, if we want to survive. 

The turnaround will be painful, and yes, there will be rivers of blood, and yes it is the effect of demoralization and fatigue. But Mr. Frodo did climb that hill and did face the evil of Mordor, so we DO have that resilience and courage to face the evil in our midst. 

If you want to delve into the philosophy and ideas behind the fight we are fighting, Please look here. 

The Freestate

G-d bless the lion of London bridge. 

In these devastating and difficult times, we need guidance. Not just heavenly guidance, but, as I see it, guidance from a certain aspect of spirit.

We are entering a war, that is quite obvious, and this war, if we want to end up with peace, has to be conducted in a very intelligent and planned manner. With this, I will be honest about whom I see as my spiritual mentor. St. Michael, archangel Michael. The leader of the free spirits, and the general of the soldiers of light. The healer and the warrior. 

I believe, that in his arms we have a way out of this destructive war we are entering. 

Let us be honest. No kind of PC talk will actually get us out of this calamity. The Muslim Brotherhood is deeply entrenched in the UK. So is Hamas, ISIS, Al-Queda and a number of the radical Islamic organizations that are fighting the jihadi war worldwide. 

In this situation, no amount of cowardice or disregard for the truth will work on our behalf. Only the honest understanding of the matter, and the action that will truly lead to the reduction of these organizations. 

In this area, I believe we need a spiritual guide, that understands war, but has peace as the aim. 

More PC will not get us anywhere, but an honest discussion will. 

It is not all Muslims who fight our ways, but those who do are Muslims, and we need to accept that and act accordingly. With all the tools of the state. Vigilantly, intelligently, forcefully and dedicated. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

Here we go again, another terror attack. This time done with simple tools, and so easy to do. All you have to do is to have knife, and then start aiming at people. 

We are so vulnerable against these attacks. 

It is on high time, that we stop treating these cases as police matter, and start treating them as they obviously are; war. 

The great differences between police work and military work are the differences on methods.The police will work with less severe methods. Put people in jail, try to prevent people from being warriors and so on. 

The military will work on disrupting the organizations of the enemy, take down as many as possible and so on. 

In a way war is much more simple than police work. 

When you have war, usually the two parties coalesce around a political or religious standpoint. We fight for justice and Democracy, they fight for the Caliphate and sharia law. 

We both believe in the quality of our own system. 

But, to be honest, the reason why we like it, is because it is our own. 

The war does not start with the competition of political systems, it starts with material competition. We compete over land, resources and so on. 

This is a fact we need to realize, and act upon. We have an enemy, who is competing with us on resources. They are not wanting to share, even though we have been so naive to believe that people who are a part of a often, but not always, violent religion, would sing the same naive songs as we do. 

Wake up, they do not. They sing songs of conquest and domination. It does not add up. 

So far, the strategies of the police has been to try and cast a net over all the jihadis, but not do much otherwise. When they were on the brink of a terrorattack, the would be caught and put to prison. In prison they would, or they do meet with other jihadis, who control the prison, and therefor they are not taught good manners and end up better citizens. No, they end up even more radicalized. 

At the same time, the police has, meticulously, trampled down any kind of discussion on these issues. If you dared to tackle the taboo, you were basically put on a death list. As Mr. Tommy Robinson can attest to. Maybe he is not right in all his ideas, but at least he has the guts to discuss it. We need an open, serious discussion on these issues to tackle them. 

This has, more or less, left the entire discussion to me, because, I am the only intellectual who is so openly Democratic, and open about it, so we have reserved a little space for me. But this is too meagre and little. We need a much broader and more serious discussion on these issues. 

All in all, the increased funding of the police has not led us closer to any solutions, but just postponed the inevitable. 

There is no silver bullet, but we need to change course. Because what we are doing right now, is not good enough, and it will only get worse. 

We need to realize, that the police cannot handle the problem, and we need to hand it on to those who know something about war. The military. 

The military is not an uncivilized part of the state, it is a highly professional, extremely competent part of society. They know what they are dealing with, we have been fighting these buggers for many years. 

Yes it will be bloody, yes it will crave sacrifices, but not realising the war, is much, much worse. 

And if someone wants to get reelected, she needs to change tactics. The electorate have had enough, it is time to change tactics. 

I will be here to guide you, as I have done in the rest of the ISIS fighting, so it will not be uncivilized. 

So, COME ON! We need to look this monster in the eyes and start fighting it. COME ON!

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

I order to realize some true progress in the election in the UK, which, but the way is on track again. One also needs to address the question of economy. 

The novel way mr. Cameron addressed this issue, has given a lot of good results in terms of economy and real jobs. That is what is needed. Real jobs and a prosperous economy. 

It all harks back to the loyalty of the producers with the nation. Something the UK is truly blessed with. 

If you look at the Brexit discussion, which is based on an economic discussion. Then wealth will be an issue. 

But wealth is not only created by having market access, it is also created by having something to sell. 

Having something to sell, will require someone who makes something. 

The easy fix is then to let the state make things, but the hard fix is to make a free environment, where private initiative will lead to loyal production environment. This is where patriotism comes in, and is very important. And this is where the opportunity for a conservative government is truly there. Patriotism is good when it is about supporting your local community. 

So this is not about cancelling free trade, but about having something to chip in on, in the free trade. 

G-d bless the will to support your nation.

​To understand what is happening with the EU right now, one has to understand the reason to the problems. 

This is not to point fingers, but simply to try and analyze the problems. 

When Dion, the supporter of the Syracusan aristocracy and friend of Plato was exiled from Syracuse in 500 BC, he tried to retake Syracuse. (A small greek state of classic times).

At the time this was seen as impossible, because the Syracusean army was very, very strong. Syracuse was a tyranny. 

But he went to Syracuse anyway with almost no help, and managed to turn around the military, the aristocracy and win over the tyranny. 

What is the learning from that example, well as Cornelius Nepos, the author of the historical treatise I am writing comments; no state can survive without the love of the people. 

This is where the problems of the EU really hits the mark. 

It is reviled by the people, and rightly so. The EU has time and again gone in the opposite direction of what the people want, and is suffering for that tyrannical behavior. 

This is a solid learning all politicians in Europe should take to heart. The political elite needs the love of the people to rule. Without it, the only other way is tyranny. I think it would be wise to really consider the ethical question that confronts all politicians of Europe. Would they continue down the path of tyranny, or, as Dion, consider the virtue and benefit of the people as their interest.

Democracy is a messy thing. Sometimes you do not get what you want. But it is much better than tyranny, because it is balanced. The different interest has a peaceful way to calibrate. 

In the US the elite is lectured by the people. That is good, in the sense, that we should truly listen to what they say, instead of, arrogantly, assume that we are right. 

The combined intellect of the people is always supreme to that of a few elitist aristocrats, whatever they may be. 

At the end of the day, politics is about being humble to the opinions that is around us, and act on them. Serve the people, not the other way around. 

G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in the face of any tyrannical development.

Europe is changing whether we want it or not, war is coming. It is already here. Not realizing this, is like the Second World War, just delaying the inevitable.

Hitler has already blown the horn, and he is moving, with intent on Poland. As in the Second World War, what we need is not another Chamberlain, we need a Churchill. Someone who has intent is intelligent, thinks about the Empire, and has the sheer courage to meet the enemy.

This is what the Manchester attack was all about, calling the Winston Churchill out.

As Mr. Churchill said, when he made his famous speeches. We need the Anglo Saxon words. The strong, often vicious words, that are unpolished and are remnants of the old ways. The way of the olden Gods.

I will give you a lesson about that, seen from the perspective of my own school Vallekilde.

In the centre hall, is a very famous painting, depicting the lore of Grundtvig. The founder of the Højskolebevægelse in Denmark.

Here you see the mother Mary holding the baby Jesus in his arms. You see them illustrious and benign.

But behind this pair, you see the founder of the olden Gods, the gods of our ancestors. Woden or in Danish. Odin. The war father.

Vallekilde is a bit more primitive than Oxford, I admit that. But the primitivism also has its strengths. One of them a deeper link to our shared past.

What would the olden gods advise us in this situation?

Woden was the god of war and wisdom. His eight legged horse and his spear war seen on many a battle field in the old times.

But unlike Thor, he was not a god of strength, he was a god of wisdom.

This is how we should approach the oncoming fight with the islamists. Not with blind strength, but with wisdom.

We have, in our culture, a lot of strength. We are, seen from outside, according to Joseph Conrad, strong, but not that intelligent.

So, to be honest, we have made many an empire, dating up to five thousand years back. But it was not made on diplomacy, to say the least.

What we have learned however, is to control our rage.

And that is what we should do now. Control our rage, to oppose the enemy we are meeting.

We should not fight all muslims, we should not fight all who are dark skinned. We should fight ISIS.

But that we should do, with all the rage and anger that is inside us. Focus that rage, to win that battle.

Use the rage and the strength that angers gives us, to put aside our worries, and FIGHT.

We need to fight on the beaches, fight in streets, fight in the media, fight where fight is needed. And YOU Boris, you need to lead that fight as a Woden behind the mother Mary.

But you need to have free reins to tackle that fight, as that Churchillian hero you are.

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

We have covered the ideological basis of the fight against ISIS. It has been like that from the beginning, and will continue like that. It is an American lead democratic fight against an inhuman enemy. Something we saw in all simplicity in the attack in Manchester. 

The power brokers of ISIS seems to have had much to free a rein for all too long, it is about time to stop that. This is where we go from phase one to phase two. Phase one was in the Middle East only. We made it a proxy war, and sought to diminish our involvement to the airborne forces primarily. 

This was due to two considerations. First we needed to recuparate after the Bush wars, and secondly we did not have the public support for another war. 

War in Europe is different. We have public support for that, and we have restocked our armory. 

Add to this a R & D focused on infantry gureillawar. We are ready. At least the American side is ready. 

So what should we do now?

We need to keep the focus we had in the first phase. The concentration of power, solely focused on the enemy, and being very careful not to harm any civilians has payed of very well. This has given us the upper hand in the Middle East. 

We need to continue this strategy in Europe. Be VERY precise in our operations. ONLY ISIS combatants or supporters should be targeted, and we have to be 100 % sure, that the enemies we hit are in fact enemies. 

We also need to think a bit about collusion on the municipal level. There are a lot of mayors who are actively working with the enemy. It happens in the UK and it happens in Denmark. So we need to take this into consideration. 

My idea is, that we simply ignore the collusion in the first phase, and concentrate on hitting the ISIS combatants. 

War is black and white. The colluders in the political rank will probably join our side as the war unfolds. 

Finally, we need to realize, that this is the time that the funding of the army has to hit the 2 % mark at least, if not more. 

All NATO members should start chipping in. All. 

Focus, precision, superb intel, and a relentless attitude without fear should get us some results. 

They are actively killing our kids, this is the call for action. Otherwise, what else is?

G-d bless the will to protect our children.  

In the face of the Manchester attack, there is a bit of soul searching for all of Britain. And a bit of waking up. 

In its essence, this is a philosophical discussion on the how’s and what’s of the conflict. It is really quite simple, if you look at it from outside. You were attacked by ISIS, the Islamic Caliphate, and you were therefor attacked by an enemy of Democracy. 

The entire fight in the Middle East has been singling out the ISIS connections and fighting it. 

Add to this a certain humanitarian revulsion against such hypocrites that have no regard for any human life. Be it the Yazidi girls or, in this case schoolgirls. We have the moral basis of our fight right in front of us. 

We fight for freedom and Democracy against the Caliphate. 

So when we speak about our values, these are the values we fight for. Democracy, rule of law, freedom, justice, humanity. Against the theocratic malevolence of the Islamic state fighters. 

This basis serves as a basis under NATO and under the whole anti ISIS league. 

So, the moral basis is clear. What we need to address is, what do we do about it. 

Here we have to be honest about the range and the depth of the Islamic State infiltration of Western Europe. 

It is a lot of people, and not tackling it, will lead to bloodshed. 

It is not enough with passive measures, we need to go on the offensive. 

Operation Tempest should be about more than protecting, and should be about rooting out the network of the islamists, and shutting it down. 

Or rather, this is where we are heading, we should be realistic about it. It will come sooner or later. 

It is devastating, but it is the result of too many years under multicultural dominance. 

I am not saying we should not be humane, we should, but we should stand up for our own values, and defend them. 

This is the call of Oxford, or at least the call of the Oxford reserve called Vallekilde, my families school.

Shed the veil, accept that there is a mournful fight ahead of us, and it will be brutal, but the alternative is the end of Great Britain and the British people, and that would be even more devastating. 

NEVER SURRENDER!

It is with the utmost horror that I hear about the terror attack in Manchester. The unspeakable atrocities done there, and I do condemn them with all there is of any shred of decency in my soul. There is no excuse for killing innocent children. And we need to buckle up, shed the illusions and get ready for another round in the ring with an abomination of an enemy. 

One could say, that this is our own fault. Multiculturalism has led us to this position, where we end up with kids dying on our doorsteps. The moral relativism of multiculturalism gives us a true moral hangover. 

We need to realize, that there is a difference between cultures. Some are better than other. By accepting the moral stance of multiculturalism, that all cultures are equal. We have effectively closed our eyes for the atrocities done in cultures that we are supposed to be on par with. There is a difference, and this is written in blood all over the stadium on Manchester. 

We need to wake up from the slumber, and realize that there is a vile, destructive enemy living within our own house, that is rearing its head, and using all the tools in the toolbox to subdue us. 

The world has become like a village, what happens in Iraq will happen in Denmark, the UK or Germany if we are not vigilant and careful. 

When it comes to the political intent of the terrorists, it seems pretty clear to me, if the news of ISIS going ballistic about the attack and celebrating. That the Wests fight with ISIS is not confined to the Middle East, but is everywhere, especially in our own countries. 

We are at war, in our own countries, due to the sick relativism of multiculturalism. 

We need to do something effective about it. Unravel the networks of the mosques that is linked to any kind of ISIS activity, or any other kind of proislamists activity, and put these guys either in jail, or on a boat to somewhere they will do no harm. We can easily find an island in or around Greenland where they will have to cope with the harsh environment on their own. I mean it, this is war, and we have to be strong and humane. 

But we need to start acting. 

G-d bless the will to be strong and decisive in the face of evil. 

The UK is in a bit of a trouble. First of all, it is the very complicated divorce from the EU. In itself a mounting task. At the other hand, there are the requirements of the British public. 

These two processes are in direct opposition. 

First of all, I believe, that Ms. May is a good choice. I did support Mr. Johnson, but he has been adequately placed in the government, and is helping rather than obstructing the process. 

I did the election campaign for Mr. Cameron the last time, so the succes it has been is partly due to my ideas, in all humbleness. 

The challenges we face this time is much harder though, the process we face is very, very difficult, and we need to meet those challenges head on. 

If we look at the EU demands, what really strikes me, is that EU thinks it is in a good position to negotiate, but the opposite is really the case. 

The UK has all to win, and little to lose from the divorce. In fact Germany seems to be the loser of the divore more than the UK. The EU Eurocrats are living on a complete other part of the earth, with demands so outrageous, that it is simply impossible to even start the negotiations. 

There are many people that are dependent on the negotiations, and the EU is practically holding these people hostage. 

But negotiation should be pretty simple, since the EU is in such a bad negotiation position, it is, more or less, a matter of the UK sizing up the project and seeing through a process that will ensure most fairness to all that are dependent on the EU machinery. 

Better do it fast than slow, the outcome is pretty much given. 

Then we can go on with all the other problems that are still around. 

If we look at the other end of the equation; the electorate. Their demands have not been met either. And their demands are much harder to meet. In fact, this process, something that is under scrutiny in the election process is really difficult. 

The winning side of the Brexit campaign basically saw a complete dismantling of all EU citizen infrastructure as the result. 

Not giving them that, will require quite a strong argument. That is not something we need in the middle of a negotiation. 

We may need to shut down a sizeable part of the EU citizen migration and see where that leads us. 

This may seem ludicrous at the moment, but if we look at the Trump campaign, this was exactly what he campaigned on, and what he won on. And honestly, it was necessary in some parts of the US. 

The same is true for the UK. 

I know that this seems inhuman, but the effect of uncontrolled migrantion is often more inhuman, as we have seen with all the atrocities in Rotherham and other places. 

We should not accept the breakdown of the law and our democratic institutions just to be humane. In fact accepting what is happening to young girls in the UK is absolutely inhuman. 

So we need a firm but humane handling of these issues. This is what Ms. May will ultimately give us. 

She has the backbone, and she is a wonderful person, we just need to support her in the awful job that is in front of us. Because it will not disappear if we ignore it. It will only get worse. And we need to do something about it. Something effective. 

G-d bless Ms. May, and may she find a way in between all the dangers that lie ahead. 

One of the true mysteries that I have pondered through the years is what good is. We talk about it all the time, and everybody, or most of us, wish to be good persons. 

But do we know what good is?I know, because I have finally had a revelation reading the Platonic dialogue Protagoras.

It is really quite simple, when it comes to the end. Good is G-d. 

We talk about love as being G-d, that is also true. But how can it be, that both love and good is G-d?

It is because that in the realm of G-d, the most prescient character is love. In the realm of love, we are all connected. This connection is love, so love is G-d. 

It goes further. We know that there are principles to the interconnectedness in the realm of G-d. Ways that this interconnectedness will thrive by or wither by. These principles are called ethics. Virtues we have observed either elevates the love between us, or hinders it. 

This is why we talk so much about being humble or sharing. Because these virtues are the helping principles that work with G-d. As a consequence, they are good principles. 

Love is the highest state of being we can be in, and all that leads to that state are good principles. 

It sounds easy, but in the brutal world we live in, it is not. 

Civilization is, in its essence, the organization that leads to the interconnectedness of men and women. If we have a good civilization, the peace and love will reign. If not, hate and destruction will reign. 

But as we have fought and warred each other for the right answers, the bottom line is quite easy to see and verify. 

The civilization most apt at making and supporting a living where love thrives, is good. 

G-d bless the will to do good, and understand what good is.  

I have a clear shot on being the king of Israel. The timing is right, the prophesies are right, and I have the motivation. 

But, the thing is, it ain’t over til the fat lady sings. Having a shot on something, is not the same as it being true. 

I say this, because I do not want Jews to be disappointed. If it works, fine, if not, then we just have to wait. 

What is important is not the possibility, it is the process of Israel we need to focus on. 

In fact, if I really end making peace, joining the three monotheistic religions, and create a new era of peace and stability. Well then that is what we need to celebrate. In fact Jewish kingship is then only a minor thing. 

My point is, we need to focus on the problems we face, and there are many. And if we end up with a new temple, then it is because we succeeded in the work we did. If we only got halfway, as we are now. Well, that is also a cause for celebration. 

We need to wrap our heads around the challenges and dangers Israel is in, and we need to solve them. 

G-d bless the intention and promise of Israel.

I have given quite a lot of thought to the issue of, what do we do now. If we look at the Republican, they are in total chaos, because they have not accomplished a viable cooperation with Mr. Trump.

This is not to say anything mean about Trump, he is what he is. It is simply to point the finger on, what we need to avoid.

We are living in revolutionary times. We live in these revolutionary times, because we need to. We need to water the roots with the blood of the martyrs.

But these revolutionary times are difficult to handle by the system. We have created outsiders that challenge the system, and the system have a difficult time dealing with it.

The critical stance is good, it is good that we are reminded about our own tendency to be corrupted and not live up to a high moral, ethical standard. This is good, and we should definitely change our behavior in that matter. Be more honest again.

Instead of repulsing our rebel, that is Mr. Sanders. We should listen to him, and meet him. Try and learn from him. Otherwise we might just end up like the Republicans with a weak organisation and a lot of chaos.

A new revolution is not about not having a Democracy, it is about changing our corrupted behavior towards each other in the political dealings.

Take a moment and look at ourselves. Are we what we wanted to be when we were young and idealistic, or are we too old and corrupted by the daily dealings. Maybe it is time to be a little young again, remember why and who. Remember the dreams we used to have, listen to Bernie and we might just also get a little of the Bern.

G-d bless the will to be idealistic and remember our dreams we used to have.

It seems to me, that there is a huge problem in Europe. The Islamist are truly arming up, the European Union is falling apart, and the questions are more than the answers. 

In this case, my basic problem is, that there are so many political parties that I am invested in, and I am in trouble because I have criticized the Eurocrats. The way it is, is like this. If I talk about the EU, the Danish authorities will punish me one way or the other. The will torture my child, fine me or in other way try to shut me up. 

So I do not speak about the EU, because they obviously do not want me to do that. I focus on the individual countries and try to help them and their issues. 

I do have a plan for Europe, that is, in its essence, to support the individual democratic forces, in their fight against the issues at hand. These being Islamism, economic issues, in Germany the rebuilding of a national identity after the Second World War and so on. 

I cannot focus on a EU process. Both because the immorality of the project is so low, that I cannot invest my name in it, and because they will try to kill me if I do. That is the bottom line. 

Sorry. 

G-d bless the will to do good. 

It is with an absolute disgrace I see the video where Mr. Tommy Robinson explain how he treated by the police in the UK. Is this really the level of civilization we have fallen to?

I know that talking about difficult things are problematic, but seriously, taking in his pregnant wife for interrogation. Scaring his kids. Are you out your mind. You are disgracing the law and the proud principles of western Democracy. It is wrong, and you owe a recompense and a huge excuse, and then you need to aim your guns at the right enemy. And seriously, Mr. Robinson is not the enemy, the Islamist are. They are the enemy, in Iraq, in Syria and in the UK. 

G-d bless the justice that may end up given back to Mr. Robinson.

I have been reflecting a bit on the ethical stance of the renewed Democratic Party. Why is it so important?

There are several reasons. First of all, because being a good person, is in itself important. Goodness or the ability to serve G-d on this green earth, is an imperative for us all. But there are other more technical arguments behind a striving for good. Democracy has, as its most difficult flaw, a very corrupting influence. The backdoor dealings, the power, the endless compromise corrupts people. 

Here it is very important for me, as a philosopher, to warn people, and try to pull people away from that corruption. That is my designated role in a Democracy, the guardian role. 

According to the Ancient Greek scriptures, the danger is, that a tyrant will overtake Democracy if we are not careful, because people get so tired about all the moral corruption, that they elect a tyrant. 

This is the phase we are in right now, or rather Mr. Barack Obama tried to be a good person and wheel things around. With succes I should say. 

But we need to continue this striving for moral clear sight. Otherwise we may lose our Democracy.

This is not to put blame on Mr. Trump. He has actually been ok, and done something we did not have the nerve to do. I do not know about the Comey case, but lets see what happens. 

But, I believe, that it is really important, that we look at the ethical basis of our great Nation, and try to live up to those values that our predecessors gave us.

Instead of cheating and making backdoor deals, we should do our best, and start being honest. Honest to the people, and to ourselves. 

But we should not stop there, we should also be good persons all in all, be brave, humble, work hard, help others in need, protect the weak, share, make an equal world and all that is good in this world. 

That is the true path we should walk, the path of goodness.

G-d bless the will to do good.

I am reading a lot of Isocrates, because he may not be as famous as his namesake Socrates, but he was, in many ways, just more practical.

A lot of the citations just speak for themselves, so I will give you a small cavalcade here.

And in btw. I have reached out with my press message about the burning of Koran, and I have been received nicely by Associated Press. I believe, that a good conclusion to that exchange could be some kind of cooperation.

It is not about the fame, it is about the democratic dialogue. I believe that it is very important that the public have easy access to the speech of the philosophers. They may happen to disagree, and they should have the right to do just that.

Otherwise I end up as a secret guardian of Democracy, which is fine by me, but is it fine to the people?

“think that all would agree that it is a king’s business to relieve the state when it is in distress, to maintain it in prosperity, and to make it great when it is small; for it is with these ends in view that the other duties which present themselves day by day must be performed.” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

“This thought you must lay to heart, and see to it that in proportion as you are above the others in rank so shall you surpass them in virtue;” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

“But, in addition, one must be a lover of men and a lover of his country; for neither horses nor dogs nor men nor any other thing can be properly controlled except by one who takes pleasure in the objects for which it is his duty to care.” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

“You will be a wise leader of the people if you do not allow the multitude either to do or to suffer outrage, but see to it that the best among them shall have the honors, while the rest shall suffer no impairment of their rights; for these are the first and most important elements of good government.” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

“Deliver your citizens from their many fears, and be not willing that dread should beset men who have done no wrong;” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

“You must care for the people and make it your first consideration to rule acceptably to them, [16] knowing that all governments — oligarchies as well as the others — have the longest life when they best serve the masses.” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

“Believe that your staunchest body-guard lies in the virtue of your friends, the loyalty of your citizens and your own wisdom; for it is through these that one can best acquire as well as keep the powers of royalty.” (from “Delphi Complete Works of Isocrates (Illustrated) (Delphi Ancient Classics Book 73)” by Isocrates)

When it comes to development of a liberal perspective, I believe there is a more profound discussion we need to take. 

It is about values. What do we really believe in. Virtue is at the heart of all political as well as personal development. According to Isocrates, virtue is the one thing you can never take away from a person. You can take away his health, money, friends, but you never take his good personality. So, in order to develop a liberal perspective, we need to understand what virtue really is in a modern world. Isocrates was, in btw. the philosopher who laid the groundwork for liberal arts, so we are at the core of liberalism. 

To me, it is quite simple. The one virtue that is the crowning virtue of all in a Democracy is freedom of speech. The first amendment. The very blood of free media, political discourse and power to the people. 

Free speech has basically two roots. One is the contemporary of Isocrates, Socrates, and his fight for free speech. Remember he chose to die rather than shut up. An idea reflected in the theatrical plays of Voltaire. 

The other root is the enlightenment philosophy of humanism. This is Egyptology, the lore of the ancient Egypt. You can also see this on the five dollar bills, with the pyramid, and the eye of Ra used by CBS. 

Each of these roots can tell us a bit about what Democracy should be today, and what we should do to develop the country.

Let us start with Socrates. Socrates was a simple man. He was not, like Isocrates, fond of making money, but was a bit of a wanderer. He had a keen intellect, and he challenged the taboos of society. He was ridiculed by many, as philosophers often are. But also accepted for his immense wisdom. What he did was to talk about the things people often did not like to talk about, because they were inconvenient. 

He is the father of media. 

With him we have investigational journalism, critics, thinkers, intellectual. We all look up to him as the ideal. 

Then there is the humanistic root. It is quite different in a way, but also has a bit of the same essence. 

Humanism is truly the lore of the temples of the city Heliopolis or On. Where the main G-d of ancient Egypt used to reside. The principal G-d of Egypt, the sun g-d Ra.

In essence, his power lie in the shining light of the sun, that is the truth. For New York, this is the hall mark of its creed. Symbolized by the Statue of Liberty. 

See, enlightenment gives freedom, especially freedom of speech. 

If we conform to these basic values, then we have a gateway to the other values. Because you can only live in the light, if you are honest, respectful, humble and live to serve. 

That is the point of Jesus Christ, he is the redeemer, because he is light. 

Let us start there. 

G-d bless the will to enlighten.

I know, that I have been a bit too supportive of Mr. Trump. But I think it is wise due to two considerations. 1. I truly believe, that the best way to make the best things of Mr. Obamas legacy survive is by cooperation. 2. There was a very true challenge to the system itself with Mr. Trump. If we had not cooperated some, he could have gone nuclear inside the system, and that could very much have ended American Democracy as such. 

Now we have had a nice transition, Mr. Trump has found a way to make his own mark on history, and we have made a good case on foreign policy, that will hopefully elevate the US and our values in the next decade or two. 

Because that is really where it all ends up, the values. 

I have given it a bit of thought, when it comes to the different perspectives that were under the election. There were mr. Bernie Sanders, Ms. Clinton and of cause other prominent policians and thinkers. 

They all brought something good to the table. Mr. Sanders brought his revolution. Ms. Clinton her ideas about children. There were already the ideas about economy, welthfarestate and security brought by Mr. Obama. Somehow, we need to think about all these different perspectives, and find a way to build a new platform that we can use as an elevation in the next election. 

Basically, the burn, or the Bern, came from that AMERICAN revolution, that Mr. Sanders  tried to initiate. The fight for equality, freedom and brotherhood. The fight against the tyranny, the eternal ideological fight for freedom, especially the Socratic freedom of speech. The truth shining from that beacon, to be seen from faraway lands. 

That was where the energy wave truly started to pick up. For a system to work and live, it needs to be powered by something. That is one very important lesson. 

Secondly the focus on education, and seeing things from a child’s perspective is a powerful lesson. We had a Danish storyteller, that cared a lot about children, and he always said. Be careful about strife, because it always ends up with the children. They pick it up, although they never had a choice about it. 

This points to education, making good schools, thinking about how families can be sheltered and helped the most. 

Then there is the Obamacare, that the Conservatives are dismantling right now. I believe, that that is a mistake. I respect the view, that it is communist in a way, and therefor can be potentially negative. But Mr. Obama did not put it up to make a communist state, but to protect the weak. It is much more a spiritual thing than a tyrannical oppressive thing. Poor people needs shelter, and we believe it to be a communal task to help those in need. 

Helping poor people is not communist, it is human. 

There are two other areas that Mr. Trump is working on right now, that we need to address. 

First it is economy. That is easy, since Trump are using my and Obamas ideas. We need to support at national production base, in order to help on jobs, and support our workers. 

Secondly there is security. Here Trump is doing ok, I don’t know the extent of it, or if it is humane. But we need to be focused on that as well. 

At least this is not such a bad start for a new basis of political development. We just need to develop it, and talk about it. 

In order to inspire a bit more. I will add a press release that I have done with my friend. He is a true, believing Democrat and he burned the Koran. 

I know that this is harsh, but that is what a revolution comes from. Uncompromising will to be free. 

G-d bless the will to be free.
————————————————–

PRESS RELEASE

Mr. John Salvensen chose to burn the Koran, the holy book of the Muslims four years
ago. The consecutive hoolabaloo was not much to behold. Some death threats, the usual Facebook harassment, but apart from that, not much.

Not until the state, that is the proislamist deep state of Denmark chose to take an interest in the matter.

First it tried to charge mr. Salvesen with a racist accusation, but how can burning a religious book be racist? The Koran represents the religion Islam and not a race.

After some reflection the state did an unprecedented move and charged mr. Salvesen with blasphemy. The first case of a blasphemic indiction in over 70 years in Denmark.

It has come to that, that in order to protect islamistic infiltration of Denmark, the rebels of such a process are blasphemers.

In order to clarify the intention behind mr. Salvesens burning of the Koran, he hereby
declares himself a burning Republican. A firm believer in the democratic system.

Burning the Koran was a democratic act, an act to clarify the essence of democratic virtue; the first amendment – freedom of speech.

Without freedom of speech, there is no democracy.

If the corrupted Danish pro islamist state uses the very same tools of statecraft as the islamist, that is, using blasphemy as an argument in the democratic debate. It has chosen side with the islamists against the democratic rebels.

Mr. Salvesen hereby declares his right to, unbridled, with our any restraints to be free in his speech on anything, be it religion, be it political discourse.

He declares, that the Danish state has become a part of the tyrannical state of an islamist colour.

Because as he says; Democracy dies in Darkness.

To contact mr. Salvesen please use the following mail 

asger@rubicon.dk. 

I am a little sorry, that the election in France went it way it went. I understand, that the situation is extreme, and true middle leaning candidates are not available, like in other countries. 

But, I would really have liked for France, to find a more simple and controlled way out of the chaos that it is in now. Because even though the French public chose Mr. Macron, the problems are still there. Unemployment, Islamism, a civil service in denial, explosion in crime and so on. 

It is what happens when you leave it to bankers to control the political development. They are not good at it. Philosophers are usually good at it, because that is what we do. Bankers are good at doing bank work.

At the heart of the challenge, that is really where it ends. Should we let the bankers or the philosophers decide. 

Maybe next time, and maybe with a more middle leaning politics. As in the UK, the US and Russia.

But, you will have my support whatever happens, because you have the most spectacular, beautiful country and culture. I love France, and we will defend it, whatever it takes. 

G-d bless the motherland, G-d bless France.

I know, that there is soon a deadline for the overall budget of the American Nation. 

There is one thing I believe we should let Mr. Trump do. That is to make a better border patrol in the south. I know, that this is difficult, because we are afraid that it will be too inhumane. But the fact of the matter is, that if we do not do anything, that will make things more inhuman. The crime and the downright disregard of greencard routines, is not good for our country. 

The south is suffering under the chaos that is going on. 

Instead of giving Mr. Trump an easy defeat, on this subject I believe we should put aside political interests and our own agenda, and see if we can make something that works. 

I am not sure it should be a physical border, but some kind of control should be enforced, and we need to back it with the right kind of funding. 

I do however believe, that it should be done in a humane way. Just because it is a problem, does not force us to be inhuman. 

But if we find a deal that truly protects our citizens in the South, we would have served the public. 

G-d bless the will to protect those who are in harms way.

To be a leading academic has never really been a goal of mine. I could have had some kind of academic career, and I was very happy with my trip to Oxford a few years back.

But to me, most academic institutions leaves too little room for crosstopical discussion. And with my rebellious attitude, I am not really the archetype of an academic.

I do however see myself as an intellectual, and a philosopher off cause.

But I also see myself as something more humble, as a craftsman. I really like crafting, especially with wood. I am not a professional, but I do believe, that what I do has a certain quality. I like to have a good idea, find the right kind of wood, use some beeswax so impregnate it with, and make all the fittings invisible.

In the olden days, my ancestors, the Vikings, they built the best boats in tree, because they were good at woodworking. They could fit oakenplanks together with so much precision, that the hull seemed seamless.

When I make philosophy, I have the same ambition. For me it is not just about the ideals that we seek, it is also about the quality.

To make a revolution in a society, it is of extreme importance, that what you make as a philosopher is of highest quality. When people use it, it should really work. If you make something of a bad quality, a lot of people will suffer. Take my economic ideas. They will support the nations that use them, at the same time, it does not hinder free trade. To me, that is quality. It strengthens the system at the same time as it strengthens the individual nations that uses it.

Or the ideas about islamcritics. It targets a dangerous foe, but at the same time, it truly respects the democratic rights of the constitution, and leaves room for peaceful Muslims to live in our society.

I really hope, that that is what I will be remembered for, the down to earth, philosophical craftsman, with an ambition for quality.

When it comes to a Liberal perspective. This attitude can be used to remedy some of the late flaws of our ideas, and strengthen other that needs strengthening.

Social Democratism, that is truly what liberalism is today, has two roots. One is socialism, the other is democratism.

The one being a reflection of Sparta and the other being a reflection of Athens. So in a way, it is a mix of two systems.

In the US, traditionally it is more of Athens, since the US was founded by Democratic revolutionaries.

So, for the house of the US to be strong and stout, the pillars carrying this house from the inside, must be primarily Athenian.

But that does not mean, that it cannot mix in a few good elements of the Spartan.

So, in its essence it should be a free country, based on freedom of speech, carried by good strong families. At least, that is what Aristotle says, and that is what Socrates says.

It should be a country of free men, proud to carry a state they themselves decide on. That is Democracy.

Lycurgus, however, the philosopher of Sparta, is not into democracy. He is into the commune. Making things work on a shared basis.

This has some merit, especially when it comes to taking care of the weak. There are some burdens that cannot be carried by private initiative, that is putting that helping hand beneath those frail shoulders, so that people can perhaps survive and ultimately live a better live.

But, and this is where we as liberals should be careful, if we make a wealthfarestate, Lycurgus says, that this state should be closed to work. Community requires solidarity. Solidarity is when people know each other, and is ready to share their wealth.

You cannot have an open border society, and a wealthfare state, these two things exclude each other.

It is a choice.

I think we should start at the most important, the Democratic values, and then supply with Socialist values, where it makes sense.

But keep our faith true to the founding fathers and their project. That is what the country needs right now. Something that unites, nourishes the roots, something that will keep the flame burning.

G-d bless the will to do good, and understand what is good.

It is with great joy, that I see, that Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump has finally had an opportunity to talk to each other. It is good, because that will, hopefully, put a break on some of the escalation of the different conflicts in the world. 

If the two great powers do not speak to each other, conflict will ensure. 

Donald, you need a strategy in the Middle East as well. Talking to Mr Putin is a good thing, it may end the Syrian conflict, and that will be a great foreign policy victory. 

But from there on, there is the entire Middle East discussion and especially the Israel discussion. 

I happen to believe, that working with proxies, does not make much sense. Now it seems that Hamas is severing its ties with the Muslim Brotherhood. But then who are the new supporter of Hamas?

Middle East politics is extremely complicated, and in itself a work. Barack and I had a lot a success with it in the first term, a work that led to the Iran peace deal. But it takes a lot of energy to work with. 

You can outsource it to Jared Kushner. But he needs to seriously up his game if he is to be taken serious. 

If he does not want to speak with me, I cant see how that will happen, but that is up to him. 

All in all, you need to either give it a lot of thought yourself, or find a good man to do all the ground work. 

I will help whoever you chose to do the work. 

But, again, good job with Putin, that is something you both deserve. And by the way. You will find, that Vladimir Putin is a good friend. You can trust him, he is on the top of his game in Russia, which is a lonely place. But he is a man you would bring to battle, because he will have your six.

G-d bless the will to find peace.

​OK, the first hundred days are over, Mr. Obama is not a president anymore, and I am on my own. 

Or rather, there are many readers here on Rubicon, that still follow my lead, and there are many projects that still needs deliverance. 

The peace project in the Middle East, the protection of Christians and Jews in the Middle East, the redemption of Europe, the strengthening of the US, the spiritual comeback of Russia, the comeback of the Anglican church and the Vatican. 

These are all projects that are mine. I suppose I am the one left to do all the heavy lifting, and so be it. 

I will not back down on my projects. 

A good thing is, that it seems to me, that the pressure of the corrupted Danish State has been lifted a bit. The isolation is not so prevalent, the endless economic harassment is less severe. 

All in all, it seems to me, that I have won. 

But as we saw in Libya, you may win war the, but winning the peace is much more difficult. 

Still let us not forget the revolution. It will only stop if we stop. 

G-d bless the will to do good.