I have been talking a lot about the American revolution. But you guys need to know what I am talking about exactly to understand what I believe Change really is.

We are talking about Democracy, right? The banner of a system that is the creed of the mightiest power earth, the very glue that binds the people together. The claim of a system that gives the US international leadership. No, what gives the US international leadership.

What is it really? And why does it make sense to strive for it, to even revolutionize for it?

Well, as Montesquieu claim, the very birthplace of the Democratic revolution is in fact not in Athens, but was brought to France through the settlers that came from Scandinavia. The Merovingians, the Goths and so on.

The yearning for freedom is not a system per se, it is the way we here in Scandinavia used to organise things.

So how did that protodemocracy actually work?

We have some written sources about it here in Denmark, because the shift from what used to be called “The Freestate” and consecutively the churchstate, is documented by the scribes of the new rising church power.

In Denmark it was founded by the king Valdemar and his bishop Absalon.

When you read about the atrocities and the torture the kings men gave to the free farmers, it is like seeing and ancient world dying in its sad, sad demise.

All the ancient elders were slaughtered, the brave young men of the Thing were killed in their beds. It led to upheaval and battles at places called Dybsiebro and Lommeå.

THIS is the ideal the French philosophers tried to recreate in France and after that in the US. The freedom of the free man in convention to chose his own leaders.

So in a sense, it is wrong to call it a revolution, it would be more precise to call a renaissance, a rebirth.

So how did it actually work.

It worked by a convention of free men, meeting a the Thing, discussing the affairs of the world. The convention, the Thing, could choose king, call for war, call for migration, could elect ministers of affair and could solve disputes.

The king would then have a hird, his personal protective guard.

So what is the difference between then and now?

First of all, there are layers upon layers between each free man or woman and the leadership. There are media, there are bureaucracy, there is business interest and so on.

Each power must be held in check, in order to let the people have power.

That is the task of the politicians, as the representative of the people.

Change is, in its essence, the striving for that Thing, that were so evilly taken away from us, from the kings men.

They had great riders, riding down our free men. The free men were tortured and put down, only to rise again a thousand years after.

This is your birthright and your mission, NEVER to let the kings men take away the freedom of your citizens again.

You had this as a birth present, and now things have detoriated a bit. You need to think about how to keep the system alive and well.

Sometimes that includes shedding all your prejudice, and look at things anew. Be honest, look at things from a fresh perspective, accept that we are not perfect, but we can be better, look at yourself and not just at other people for faults.

Democracy has this thing called, Change, because it is the greatest motor of changing, sometimes not to our liking, but always to the liking of the people.

Arm the people with wellbeing, security, good institutions, justice, safety, jobs. But all these things are basically superficial, what is the most important to give the people, is freedom.

G-d bless the willingness to be bold in action and honest in conduit. G-d bless the United States of America.

Well, I have just had the honor to attend a speech by the late ambassador to Denmark by the US. It was a trip down memory lane, with all the things that Mr. Gifford told us about how he experienced his stay here in Denmark and his loss at the election.

I almost felt I was there with him. I had exactly the same feelings of loss and defeat.

Then, the crux of the matter with the Democratic party; what now? After such a profound loss, something we have not really recovered from, then what now?

When Barack and I set out to Change the American Democracy, we did exactly that. We fought for Change for two central pillars of American society. The Democratic Constitution itself, and the church of America.

We call it Hope and Change. Hope being a reinstatement of the faith of the church. Change being the reinstatement of the faith in the Democratic system.

We did it because there was a problem. Faith in the church was seriously lacking, and the faith in the system was lacking.

I will give you a story, that might tell you a little about what is really at stake here.

In the Bible, there is a story about a man who lives in a city, where everybody are corrupt. G-d tells him, if he can find one man beside himself that is good, then he will redeem the city.

He cannot find another good man, so G-d burns down the city Sodom, bring hellfire to bear.

This is the stakes we are up against, and the reason why our Democracy is failing. The corruption in the system is eating the whole Republic.

So what did we do; we tried to inspire a new generation of good people, that would strengthen their own resolve, and reject the corruption of the city.

Unfortunately, we never realized that project, the people did not see what we were trying, and they elected someone to tell us to clean up, to be strong in our conviction of moral integrity. No more coronations, no more back ally deals. Clean people, with a clean slate.

So, in a strange way, both the people and Barack and I agree. We should repent, do better, be better people. Stop taking anyones money. Be simple and idealistic, with the will of the people.

We sincerely tried to ask G-d for another chance, and he did not really agree.

So what is the morale of this story.

The morale is, we need to do better. Shed all the corruption, if we can. Be good, in our hearts, be wise and honest.

So Mr. Gifford thinks, that there is a new generation of leaders coming up, and there are many who wish to be the next leader.

At least, that is a good thing. There are actually now people flocking to the banner, trying to be honest and search for a clear way out of the mess.

So all is not lost, we still have time.

Democracy will only survive by the blood of the martyrs.

I gave you my best years, while I was tortured by the Danish state.

This blood of mine, I gave you without any thought of repay, is the blood you are running on now.

Use that sacrifice wisely. Because I did not only do it because I am your friend, I did it because you have the most illustrious, beautiful, amazing and wonderful Democracy on earth. Your system is a rare gem of politics.

We philosophers invented it, and now it is in trouble. I hope, that the transfusion you got from me, will save it.

Because otherwise, such an amazing thing will fall away. That would be devastating.

So buckle up, lift your chin, have faith. It will come around, if you just look insides yourself, and fight for Change and Hope.

Because that would be the fundamentals of Democracy and Church.

G-d bless the willingness to do good, and never give up in these difficult times.

We need to start reflecting on a possible fight with both China and North Korea.

On the one hand, we have a pretty good situation. Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin are friends, and hopefully this will be a bulwark against the vision of an American/Russian war, which nobody wants.

We can, if we are good at this game, keep the fight as a local fight only.

Then there are the strategic considerations concerning the fight itself. The media is not really a problem anymore, and if Russia keeps out of the fight, we will not need to worry about the Disinformation campaigns that lost us the last war against North Korea. But this is a potential problem we need to take into consideration.

Then there is the cyber threat that is really the largest threat of fighting China, we risk them shutting down our systems, both military and domestic. This can be difficult and risk loosing a lot of lives, not least civilians.

When you fight against a serious threat as China, you need to be clear about your objectives from the beginning, and you need to attack with full possible force, there is no room for dangling.

So if we are serious about this, all available troops and material should be amassed, and then used in a swift attack.

The tradition is founded by Carl the Great, and then used, with great success by Nazi Germany, they called it Blitz krieg.

The Chinese army is undergoing a modernisation, but a great part of it is still not any match for the superior American hardware. So, there needs to be a detailed plan of attack, both on North Korea, and then also on China.

We need to make some serious plans here.

We might never use them, but the serious sabre rattling tells a different story.

Using a military as the advanced one made by the US, is using some very expensive hardware. What we do not need, is to be scared of using it, to keep it intact. When we use it, we use it. That is the learning of Carl the Great. In his time, they had the same problem. Armies were expensive, so they were almost never used, except for Carl the Great, who used them and won.

What is obvious off cause, is to hit the nuclear and long-range missile bays first, and then invade with troops and other materiel.

After we hopefully win, we also should consider what we then do with the occupied lands. We need them to be pacified, but we should also consider regime change.

We will see where it all ends up, but we need to be prepared.

G-d bless the will to see clearly in these difficult times.

There are some voices around the world, that calls for at new strategy for the West. Well, what about the strategy that we are already following, and seems to be going all right?

I mean, if there already is a strategy at place, then why make a new one.

The strategy that is in place was made by me, in all humility, under the Obama administration, and actually Mr. Trumps seems to be following it, more or less.

There are som differences of objective in and around China. I would have attacked China head on, but, it will end there, probably.

In the other end of the world, there is ISIS, that is moving into Europe. With more attacks coming.

This was also something that I prepared for under the Obama administration, and it is simply the result of a detailed strategy.

My idea was, basically, that we needed to tackle the violence done by the islamic fundamentalist by defining and understanding them as an opposition to Democracy.

The problem in the West, is lack of faith in our own system, our own values. So in order to rekindle the faith in Democracy and humanism, we needed to be clear WHY we fight the islamic fundamentalists. Because they oppose our values.

This will begin, sooner rather than later, and I really hope that Mr. Trump will be able to lead this struggle, it is his claim to fame, and it will cement the leadership of the U.S.

At the other side of the American continent, there is the fight against China. This Barack and I initiated in the second election of his presidentship against Mitt Romney. The reason is quite clear, China were out competing the US in terms of industrial output. This will not work on the long run. We need to fight back, and we did.

So, in the one end, we have a fight to boost our values, this boost will give us the will to fight the other fight.

So in a sense, it would be most adequate to begin the fight in Europe first, because then we would have the moral strength to take the other.

But, we will see how it will end.

But, that is the strategy.

G-d bless the will to do good in this terrible fight.

In this situation, where the West is ridden with self-doubt, on our values, on the way we should conduct our course, it is time for us to change our conception of ourselves.

As I have tried to converse about in the past, I sincerely believe, that there is such a thing as spirit.

I have even brought forth a prove of my ideas.

This is intrinsically linked to our downfall, because the reason why we are in this difficult situation, is because we have no faith. No faith in spirit, and no faith in ourselves.

If we define intelligence as the spirituality in ourselves, then looking at that spiritual core is understanding what G-d is, in ourselves.

We are not G-d, but we share a part of G-ds being in ourselves.

As Aristotle say; G-d is the unmoving mover.

Therefor G-d in us must have something to do with moving things.

This is the problem for us these days, we cannot move anything, because we have no faith.

So in that Aristotelian sense, G-d is our willpower.

I believe, that willpower is intrinsically linked to ideals. We move things, because we want to make a better world somehow. Ideals being the plan of a better world, that is closer to G-d.

Therefor, as a conclusion, what we need are clearer ideals, and with that we will regain our will.

THAT is why we need to get away from the ideals of the last century, and reunderstand the values in this century.

Specifically, what is the fight for Democracy today? Where does a humanely understanding person strive to use his powers for good?

The WILL being the spiritual part of ourselves, that is really the moving part.

That is Change, the will to find a more democratic and humanistic world.

But this has to be based on wisdom, otherwise we will not challenge the problems we have in a serious and effective way.

It seems to me, that the fringes of our political development are choosing stasis, unmoving, while the centre is actually moving things.

Strange, it usually is the other way around.

G-d bless the will to see and do good in a desperate situation. And G-d bless all the victims of the late storm, we wish you all the best, from the bottom of our heart.

I have not blogged a lot about the UK for some time. Why? Because things are actually pretty stable, and the negotiations with the EU is proceeding with a good tempo. Not too fast, not too slow.

In the meanwhile, the US is in a lot of trouble, and they really need my help. Mr. Trump has a lot of problems, and not helping him, will mean the end of American leadership for some time, maybe for ever. These are the stakes.

We need a strong US in this world, with their traditions for Democracy and humanism.

Anyway, rest assured, if and when things move again, I will be there to carry you through these things as well. Or at least try.

In the meanwhile, the work mr. Johnson is doing in the realm of empire building, is really quite good. Bringing the family together again, should have been done a long time ago.

This is not evil imperialism, this is basically a family reunion, and family need to stick together, right?

There is a war coming in all of Europe, if we want it or not. The implications of this is truly terrible, but we need to get on with it, and protect our citizens.

Anyway, you are, right now, in pretty smooth waters, use it to prepare yourself for the wonderful expansion of your own clout in the world, and listen when Trumps comes and want to fight IS in Europe. Working together can mean a lot of cross sharing in terms of intel, fighting and so on.

Be glad, that you are on a good course, for the first time since the first world war.

It is not much, but you actually managed to stem the flow, and change the course.

Mr. Cameron was really the man behind the change of course, and he has not really got the benefit of this admirable feat, hopefully he will in the history books. He sacrificed a lot, and he serves the thank yous and all the medals. At least I will remember a courageous and well-meaning student of Brasenose college, who changed his country at the cost of his career.

G-d bless the willingness to sacrifice for the realm.

The military build up for the American troops, have two focuses. Firstly, it has to fight down ISIS, secondly, it has to prepare for a war with China.

The first is really well done in the Middle East, where ISIS has it last stand these very days. Well done General Mattis, very well done.

The next theatre of war is Europe, where IS is entrenched in the refugee masses, and has a general stronghold in many European cities. Cities like Barcelona, London and the like.

The strategic challenge has been prepared meticulously by the last administration. It includes R & D in new weaponry, and a strong but honest pressure on our European allies.

Mr. Trump is ahead in this game, but has all the media collusion against him. But he will be able to make an alliance against these dogs of war who are punishing our kids. Look in the newspapers, there you have it.

This is designed to be American lead. That is a fight for Democracy against a vile and inhuman opponent.

If we play it well, we can do it by using minimal personnel. It should not be a fight fought by American troops, but in the league that Obama and I created. It will, if we take the lead. Or rather let Mr. Trump do it.

The strategy is clear, we just need to put pressure on our NATO allies to finish up the preparation.

There has come a EU army in the meantime, which is a bit of a problem. We need to work around that, and see if we can make them see the wisdom in fighting IS in Europe. They will, if they feel listened to, and can see that the strategy is sound and reflects their Democratic values as well.

But we need to move now, and not be caught up in internal bickering.

Concerning the Afghanistan question. My take on it is this; we went there to fight terror. Terror has morphed into ISIS. ISIS is not represented that much in Afghanistan. So we need to move our troops. Mr. Obama killed Osama Bin Laden, so he is finished, we do not need to linger in Afghanistan anymore. We should not leave a power vacuum. But we won when we got Osama bin Laden, so there is actually not much to do there anymore.

There can be some extra strategical considerations, but we need the troops elsewhere. Just make sure we do not make an Iraq scenario where IS moves in after we move out, and everything is cool, and settled.

Elsewhere in Africa we need to be on the ball. Things are changing in Egypt and Libya. Russia is doing some things there, and France.

So we need to be in the party.

One thing I think we should consider, is to help the part of the Libyan government that reaches out for us. I am not sure, there is a lot of corruption in Libya, and we need to make sure we build a true Democracy, if we go in there. We bungled it the first time, so we need to be careful. But this is an opportunity to show some leadership, if the other countries are willing to let us. Just be careful.

Here again, Mr. Trump could be the man of the day. He has good rapport with both Mr. Macron and Mr. Putin. Let him do what he is good at; make friends and solve strategic riddles. He really did good by showing consideration for Mr. Putin in a situation where the US got really a lot of bad rep. from the Russians.

Concerning the Chinese spectacle. This is war gentlemen. It is not something we want, it is the result of geopolitical movements. They are getting stronger in economic terms, and we will lose our clout and power in and around China, if we let them. Ultimately costing us our own freedom.

I know we are at a risk of nuclear war, but that is how things are. If we afraid of going to war, then there is no point of having a military.

Remember our opponent, China is much more scared of war than we are.

Nuclear holocaust has not happened yet, but we must be realistic in the sense, that it could happen. Showing a brave show of force, will hinder it, and perhaps even stop it.

Not doing anything we, eventually get us all killed. We need to stop the threats.

Again, please understand, that Mr. Trump is, first and foremost, the most potent military asset you guys have. He can make deals none other can, and he has become the personal friend of most top dogs in the world.

He is not a racist, he is a rebel, and he tries to change the dynamic of Washington, and protect the American people, even though, with his limited political experience, that is very difficult.

But we need to understand, that right now, American leadership is i trouble, and if we do not work together, we might just lose it altogether.

Be realistic about these challenges, they are tough, but not impossible.

So, we need to stick together gentlemen, because Winter is Coming, and we need to be prepared.

G-d bless the willingness to be fair and honest in the protection of the United States of America.

The élite of the US is really in havoc, Mr. Trump has been a juggernaut, but the effect has been absolute chaos.

The animosity he inspires is huge, and he cannot do anything right. For me, as a Obama man, this is a little weird, I am used to the exact opposite, but be as it may, we need to get things in order to proceed somehow.

This is an example for Mr. Trump. I actually know exactly how you feel, because here in Denmark, I am you. In the sense, that I have had all the animosity of the élite on my frail shoulders, MORE in fact, if you can imagine that.

They killed my mother, they tried to kill my wife, they infiltrated my family and so on. So I know how it is to have the system against you.

Anyway, here comes the example, that may give you an idea about how you may turn things around.

When I was a teacher at the preschool teachers school. That is, I used to teach the young fine women that take care of our young, I had this amazing experience.

I was pretty young and idealistic, and I had this little team of students that was my responsibility.

I had to help them on their program plans and so on.

I wanted them to be politically engaged in the school, join the students board, make a difference. I really bled for them, and it helped. The best student, she went to the students council and became the leader, I was so proud of her.

But the other old teachers, they actually did not care much for the students, all they really cared about, was to talk with each other and be smart when it came to pedagogical theories. To quote a french a philosopher was seen as the height of intellectual status in the group.

For me, as a new teacher, I did not really understand it. Weren’t we supposed to care for the students? But, I kept a low profile, because I was new and didn’t want to stir any trouble. Lord knows, that is was is always happening to me, I stir trouble here in Denmark.

Then one day, at the middle of one of these long discussions on some intellectual problem, my student came into the teachers room. Remember, she was the leader of the students council.

Everything just went quiet in the room. As though people were thinking; what is she doing here?

Then it struck me, the other teacher do not care about the students really. All they care about are each other.

But I really cared about the students, and that had as a result, that the students actually moved.

My point is. The élite often do not care much about the people, they care about the other elites, and see themselves as a part in a game.

True politics are about seeing through this illusion, and really see the needs of just normal people.

The other point is, if you see those normal people, they will see you. So I use my time changing the perception of the students, not caring much for all the other teachers, and you could do the same. See through that veil, and care about normal people, see yourself as the representative of the people in government.

Barack did the same, and he moved a lot. But he had another position somehow.

But that does not hinder you from doing the same as he did, care about the people and their needs.

It is difficult, I admit that. But not impossible.

About that wall, it needs to be built, I really support you on this, and I think party politics should not interfere with it either. The people need it, and that is what we should worry about.

G-d bless the unity we can have, if we try our very best.

When you are young you are usually a communist, otherwise you have no heart. But when you are old, you are usually a conservative, otherwise you have no brain, the saying goes.

Well, this is wrong, moral authority has nothing to do with your age, it is about faith.

You can be young and corrupt or old and idealistic. Take Martin Luther King. Did he lose his faith in his old age? Absolutely not. He had faith in the common cause of man in this age of extremes. He sought to make ends meet, and make people have faith in the U.S. be he black, white or whatever.

Perhaps in these difficult times, it is time to remember his example? Unite instead of dividing?

I know that things seem desperate, and Mr. Trump seems like a catastrophe, but he is just a human being, and he is not evil.

Likewise, the revolutionaries on the other side are not evil either. They just feel like there is no solution, and at the end of the line.

What if we are not at the end of the line, but at the beginning? What if this is not a time of destruction, but a time of rejuvenation?

WE can make it like that. A time where we come together despite our differences, despite all our misgivings, despite all the things we feel ENTITLED to.

Spirit is not a place of division, it is a place of unity. Instead of looking at this material world we have, with our own gain as the purpose, we should look at our neighbor, and think about what he needs.

Not ourselves, other people. What they need.

Strife is a dangerous thing, peace is a good thing. But it all depends upon us shedding our ego, and thinking about the kind gesture we can do, and not what we THINK we are entitled to.

G-d bless The United States of America.

At the realisation, that the European continent and the UK is under the threat of Islamic State attacks. We also need to realise, that it will not go away with the usual lethargic strategies. There is no “let us sit in a circle and sing Kumbaya”. There is only one thing, and that is war.

It is devilish, terrible and awful, but the war is here, and we need to act accordingly.

I know, that people suffer tremendously from lack of opportunity in the third world, but that does not sanctify the mass exodus from Africa to Europe.

These trends are not only tearing Europe apart, but will, if not contained, spill into a mass suicidal war for all of mankind.

It has to be stopped in its tracks, it has to be handled professionally from the beginning.

The main problem is a rise of political Islam within many muslim, especially Sunni muslim circles.

It may seem as a righteous cause, but it is not, it is simply causing a lot of chaos and is the spark that can tear all of Islam apart.

Therefor, the responsible European states MUST act to defuse the ticking bomb.

How is this obtained? It is obtained by a mass repatriation of the proletariat that has been formed under the suzerain of the European Union. As the European Union is buckling and shrinking, the effects of its misconduct must be handled.

It may be hazardous and difficult, but if we do not simply send the people back to safe environments, the ongoing conflicts will spill into even more radicalization of the European peoples. Nazism will rear its ugly head again, and other forms of white supremacy groups will gain momentum.

Therefor, the liberal and Democratic forces that still prevail in Europe, must take a complete different stand on these issues, and make a mass exodus of the malcontents. To simply defuse the bomb that the EU has planted.

This will be difficult, but with an iron political will, and the right investments in security measures, it is possible,

IS is thriving in the poor and disenfranchised muslim diaspora communities, and we risk an all out war with them, on the European continent.

This is what we should prepare for, but it is what we can avoid, if we take this refugee/migrant problem at its root, and reverse the flow.

It is not inhuman, otherwise the malcontents and the Europeans will be at each others throats in just few years, we need to act with force and precision to avoid it.

I am so sorry, but we are left with no other choice, if we are to avoid mass war within the European Union. A mass war with an enemy that chooses to have sex slaves and treat Yazidi girls as mere meat.

They will do the same with us, in fact, in certain areas of Europe, this trend is already there to see for those who dare.

Shame on us, for not reacting while we can still defuse the bomb.

G-d bless the will to act in a terrible situation.

It has now been the third major Islamic State attack this year in Europe. First Nice, then London now Barcelona. Beautiful Barcelona, the home of Gaudi and with one of the finest cuisines in all of Europe.

We cry with you, we feel your sorrow, we see your crying eyes, and we cry with you. We know how hard and terrible these things are, how much you feel scared and the surrealistic experience.

We must come together, not only in words but also on action. These atrocities must stop, but it will not stop, unless we are clear-sighted about the range and character of the threat.

These are militant, dangerous and professional killers. They thrive in a world with open borders and a laid back security culture.

So, as a consequence, even though it breaks my heart, we need to stop being so laid back, and actually invest in security. Not just a little, but a lot. We need to come together in NATO, and plan ahead for the increased violence, and we need to see this as it is:

A violent attack on the Spanish Democracy. As it was a violent attack on the Democracies of France, The UK and Denmark.

We should not confuse the intent with that of all Muslims, they do not hate us all. But a lot of them do.

So we need to be realistic about this. Be serious about border control, security threats, and also the growing desperation of the socially disenfranchised proletariat of migrants in and around Europe.

Though they all are disenfranchised, they are also a mounting problem. We need to solve it, and be serious about this.

Otherwise we will end up in much hotter waters, and that would end Europe as it is.

G-d bless the will to be serious and tough with these things, and G-d bless the victims of another terrorist attack, mothers and children. It is despicable.

There is a lot of problems in the U.S. right now. The “fringes” of the Republican and Democratic establishment are on a mutual meltdown with things going on, that is simply not right.

None of the two sides are in their right mind with the amount of violence and general misbehaviour seen by numerous attendants.

I truly abhor the murder by the man killing innocent bystanders in a IS type attack. And the amount of destruction brought to us by the Antifa, is just as absurd. It is just not right.

I say this with the strange situation of actually being right in the Middle, I was a part of the initiation of the alt-right, and I have been the good friend and inspirer of the Democrats.

What do we do?

Well, I have been doing som research on metaphysical studies, and it just struck me, that the founder of modern liberalism mr. Alinsky must have dipped his toes in Hermetic water. Hermetism is the secret lore behind alchemy, magic, and harks back to the ancient Egypt.

Mr. Alinsky dedicates his book, Rules for Radicals to Lucifer. Strange right? Well if you know something about Hermetism, it is not so strange. Lucifer CAN be seen as a ligthbringer of sorts. In btw. I do not believe in that, I believe that Satan is Satan.

But, this explains mr. Alinskys talk about Change.

Remember, the main epithet of Mr. Obamas presidency; Change. He has this idea from Alinsky.

Anyway, I believe that I truly have a more profound understanding of Change, after having read some of the sources of Mr. Alinskys ideas, probably.

The point is, basically, that everything in the material world changes, and everything in the spiritual world is fixed on a principle level.

So, truly what Alinsky is talking about, in a deeper sense, is the understanding of the world as a world of Flux.

Things Change all the time, and therefor, we need to change with it. Find new answers to new problems.

This is truly where I believe, that I gave Obama something, and strangely enough, also the Alt-right. Both parties wanted to Change, understand the world anew, and give new answers to new problems.

Take the problem of terrorism. After 9/11, it was pretty clear to everybody, that all muslims are not good guys. There are some, who wish to hurt us. So we needed a new answer to that new development. We needed to Change. So we looked at it, and decided, that all muslims who respect Democracy are the good guys, and those who are against it, are the bad guys. We Changed.

Take the question of economy. We realised that the old answers of trickle down economics and just Keynes is not enough. We needed new ideas, so we came up with the idea of patriotic businessmen. That was Change.

My basic point is. That those morons who are battling each other down south, are actually the ones who have not changed. They are still holding on to the old ideas, and it is as despicable as ever.

But those who have been on the journey of Change, tried new paths, reinvented politics, they are actually not so far from each other.

My point is, in all this mayhem and destruction, there is a great part of society, that actually tries their best to find common ground. To work together, to find each other.

Those are the ones Barack and I tried to inspire and give new fuel. Those who wish to protect and serve this great country, and not destroy and ruin things.

They are the ones who seek solutions and try to amend.

They are the harbingers of Change.

G-d bless the United States of America.

I think the preparations for the war with China is running quite well.

First of all, Mr. Trump has got a new way of handling the press. It really works. Instead of going through different mouthpieces, we can control the escalation and de-escalation ourselves. It served us pretty well in the North Korea challenge, and it actually made it possible to give the Russians a feeling of pride in the face of the humiliating actions by congress towards Russia.

There is one thing however I think is pretty important to get working within the presidential house; the presidential family.

You know, as one of my great heroes of political thought once wrote; the worst thing about politics is that the families always seem to fall apart. There are however, once in a while those few couples who seem to do the opposite, and actually support each other so much, that the shared political output is better than one of them alone.

I think that Mr. Obama and his beautiful wife, was one of those couples. They are really good together.

My point is, you need to make your family work while you are president. Not only your wife and her positive position, but also the rest of your family. They need protection, they need to feel that they are contributing in a positive way. The more the presidential family is in harmony, the more you can use of positive energy on your own goals.

Barack did an admirable thing I think, he had dinner with his family each and every day. Even in stressful times, he still came home and saw his children, listened to their worries, and tried to be a good parent. Everybody admired him for that, because it did show his true character as caring parent.

That is what is important, family, country and one G-d.

G-d bless the United States of America.

It seems to me, that we are trying but not really succeeding in the proces of finding new ways in the Democratic Party.

Look at it this way; ideas are principles you fight for, to make a better world. Now, the thing is, the world changes. You have different challenges in different times.

When Karl Marx founded Marxism, he was living in a world, where the industrialization was running amok. Workers were living under the most difficult conditions. So Marx made an ideology that matched the challenges of the society.

It became a huge succes, because it really had a lot of quality.

The same can be said of the French Revolution. That revolution was the result of a crisis in the Aristocratic systems of Europe, especially in France, where sexabuse by the aristocracy was widespread.

The next step after Marx, was the Frankfurterschool. That were some Communist Jews who had to flee Germany, and then founded what is, more or less, modern academia in the US.

Again people of immense learning, and they had some good ideas. But the world changes, and new challenges are presented to our generation. Namely those of Islamic conquest and the deteoriation of the working middle class.

So it is a matter of fighting for our values: democracy and getting jobs back to the U.S..

Add to this a rejection of the nihilistic part of Marxism, focusing on a spiritual reawakening.

I am not saying, that we should not protect minorities, we should, but we should not make it the only focus of our ideas. These are subject to the new ideas. That is Democracy, and spirituality.

That is Change, remember. Change is not about keeping the same old, same old refrains, but about renewing ourselves, finding new ways.

The world changes, we need to change with it.

That was actually what it was all about, the Obama presidentship, Change. If we forget that, we also forget the best and most astounding turn around for not only the U.S. but also the Democratic Party.

So let us get back on the horse, straighten our backs, and have a little faith in Change.

G-d bless the will to see things in a different light.

It is really difficult how to embrace both Mr. Trump and the Democratic Party plus all the supports of the ladder.

On one hand, I am a truly loyal person, I do not jump from party to party, and I never will. I suppose I am also a good friend, or at least, I really try my best.

But the thing is, BOTH mr. Trump AND the Democratic Party really needs my support, and has a claim on it.

Add to this the problem, that the world is at a very dangerous crossroads in terms of military development, everybody really needs me.

So, I truly hope, that you do not see my support of any of you as a rejection of the other political part. But a practical and necessary thing to do.

I will try, to the very best of my limited ability to be a serious and really good friend to both parties.

We are talking about a potential nuclear war coming up, that needs the best we can all give. This is very dangerous, but we will prevail.

G-d bless you all, and I truly hope you see, that help is for all who truly needs it and come with an open mind.

Well, well done Mr. President, you stood up to what you believed in, and called off North Koreas game. I am proud of you, well done.

This is difficult in a situation, where you have so many against you. But, the fact of the matter is, that there will be hellfire raining down on our enemies. That is the way it will be.

If we look at the comparative strengths and weaknesses of the China debacle. We are strong on fighting power, IF we amass all our troops. And we are weak in cyberspace.

The Chinese have been developing their spooknetworks for a long time, and are better than we are in this area.

This gives us a disadvantage in the realm of networkcontrolled munitions, communication and so on.

I believe it is pretty obvious, that we need a plan B, if the Chinese manage to shut down our networks, GPS systems and so on. And we need a weapon to take down their networks, if possible.

But that is all in a bit of future.

Right now, there is North Korea. We need to realise, that there is no such thing as a Iran solution. It is really not in our interest, and they are far more geeky than the Iranians. The Iranians were angry because we did not recognise them as a civilisation. The North Koreans are just a Chinese proxy that continues the fight that the Russians have stopped.

For fifty years they have sought to undermine our leadership and strength. They are almost there, and this is really a last call of action. We need to realise this, we have our backs against the wall, and if China succeeds with their ambition, they will not treat us well, there are too many grievances.

So we need to fight them down, on our own terms.

Actually things are shaping up, I don’t know if we have a deal going on with India, but they are actually with us, and thank G-d for that. That is sent from heaven, G-d bless them. This is a blessed occurrence.

Anyway, we still need to think about our troops and strengths. We need to build a league against China/North Korea.

We will not have the Russians with us, but we will have them with us in another theatre of war, that of the war against the Islamists.

The strategy I built with Obama, was to fight two menaces at once, giving a boost to our collected enterprise.

We fought the IS, because they are a menace, and we supplied, built up the economy and so on, in preparation to the fight with China.

The fight with IS was supposed to boost the morale, and create a network of allies. This is still holding, and it will continue in Europe.

So we have a leading role in both Asia and in Europe.

Our European allies need our leadership in the fight against IS in Europe, and as a consequence, they will follow us on China as well.

See the double strategy?

Bottom line, what we need to do now, is to make plans for an invasion of North Korea and China, see where it leads us. They need to know that we are serious about this.

At the other hand, we need to make deals with NATO both on the China conflict, but more importantly on IS in Europe.

It is hell over here, car crashing every day in France, UK and Sweden, that is a mess, even though they are not part of NATO.

But these tandem preparations should be done openly, and effectively.

We also need to rethink our engagement in Afghanistan, we need those troops in other places.

But the next half a year is a phase of preparations. We need to get the huge military machine into high alert, and get them to be ready.

This is it, gentlemen. The first fight of Mr. Trump, and that is going to make America great again.

G-d bless, and keep safe.

Dear mr. Trump, it seems to me, that the trouble of governing such a huge country as the U.S. is a more daunting task than you realised in the first place.

It is, I remember the first phase of mr. Obama and my work. It was the same, trouble, difficulty in getting things through congress and so on.

But, you do have a few tricks up your own sleeve, and I will give you one really good one here.

There is one tool, that you still have not used in foreign policy; your attention.

I will give you an example. When Bruce Springsteen campaigned along Barack, he did not like it that much. I really like Bruce Springsteen, but Barack and Bruce did not connect that well. So Mr. Springsteen felt kind of off beat.

What did Barack do? He took him on one of his flights on Air force One. A rare treat, Barack did that for a very few people. That helped, they caught each others attention, and from there on Mr. Springsteen campaigned very well.

The same thing goes on in foreign policy, and in domestic policy for that matter. You can, by giving attention to people you want to draw closer to the U.S. strengthen the diplomatic bonds. It works, and it gives the U.S. some leverage over the political scene.

One of the things Mr. Putin was really angry about was the fact that you did not visit him, for instance.

But, this is a way to forge alliances with different powers around the world. For you it actually has payed off with your visit to Saudi Arabia, that gave the U.S a precious ally. The sword dance may have been a little awkward, but it worked.

Take India, we actually have a pretty good chance of drawing them closer to us. This makes sense, since we are in an open conflict with China. So you could go to India, and see if you could draw them closer. That would increase the pressure on China.

As for Mr. Putin, he really deserves a visit too, in my eyes, he stood up for you for a long time.

Anyway, that is not for me to decide, I just try to give you the tools you need to succeed. Right now we need to box in China, and so we need to make friends with their enemies and not get too much in the crosshairs of their allies.

It is actually also a lot of fun to visit countries, I think. But I have always really liked travelling, so maybe that is just my taste.

But anyway, you can use your presence and attention as a tool in statemanscraft. Box in China, make friends with the countries around China, and you have a better base to fight from

G-d bless the will to be strong in a difficult situation.

The congress is scared about one thing; do you Mr. Trump disentangle the democratic process. They have, honest to say, something to put that fear in. The first hundred days were mostly executive orders, and they have not recovered from that yet.

What you experience, is the first backlash after the first hundred days. Now, after the first hundred days, there is a new phase. That is the phase of being presidential. You can get less through, and you need to focus more on foreign policy.

Leave them alone a bit. I do not say, that you should stop the prosecution of the paedophilic rings, on contrary, if it is really true that peadophilia is rampant in some upper class circles, no excuse is enough. It has to be trampled out, as did his eminence pope Francis. It is disgusting, and I have your back the whole way on this issue.

Then there is the discussion on how to be presidential. You have it in you, you proved that at the Poland speech. That was not only a little presidential, it was an amazing feat, worthy some of the best American speeches over the years. You know my stance on the EU, and I really support you here. The EU is no good news.

But back to the art of being presidential. It is like this. The democratic institution is made of three parts. The lower house, the House of Representatives. The upper house, the Senate. The presidential institution, you.

These three parts of the democratic system reflects three parts of the society namely the people (lower house), the aristocracy (the upper house), the king (the president). There is a lot of fancy smancy theories behind this system, but the point that is important for you, is the fact, that you are ideally the king.

That is really all there is about being presidential, you need to act like a king. Now, what would that be then?

A king is, ideally, the servant of the people. He tries to understand the needs of the people, and enact it. But there is more to it, he is also the embodiment of the law. That being, in the case of the US, the constitution. You are supposed to be perfect in your understanding and respect for the law. This is where people are afraid, do you respect the constitution or not.

So in order to win over the House and the Senate, what you need to do, is to study the constitution, reflect on it, and then act from that perspective. For instance, is freedom of speech endangered? Your job is to make sure it does not happen. Is the integrity of the state at danger, fight that danger and so on.

It is not a matter of your way of speaking, it is about the values of the constitution. Do you protect them, no, do your fight for them, in the morning, in foreign policy, in media, in the streets. DO you care for the freedom of the American people. If you do, you will be accepted, nay, hailed as the best president in a long time. Reagan did just that. Stood up for Democracy against Communism. You have your challenges ahead of you, you have to find a way to tackle them, on the sound basis of the best constitution the world has right now; the American Constitution.

G-d bless the United States of America.

A lot of the people that read Rubicon are spiritually searching people. Not people who have all the answers, but people who try to understand what G-d really wants us to do here in our brief time on the planet earth.

We are all sinners to a certain degree, but we are also persons who have a choice in live. Do we want to do good, or do we follow Satan down that seductive path into darkness.

Are we creatures of light or darkness.

As a true believer in the light, I suppose I did try to find that secret path of the light. The path you cannot see, but you know is there. The path where you have to reflect on every step. To see if it is a step of good or bad.

It has lead me, among other things to be believer in Judaism, and the tenets of that ancient creed. But due to some unfortunate occurrences, a lot of persecution and so on, this has been difficult. Living in a practical hideout without many Jews around has been a bit of a nightmare, to be honest.

But, you know, good faith will bring you miracles. Today some of my friends stopped by, and made my Bar Mitzvah. It was pretty awesome, you know being protected by spirit, is not something to take lightly.

So, I feel it was such a momentous experience for me, that I wanted to share it here on Rubicon. You are not introduced to spirit everyday.

Thank you for listening here, and may we all be enlightened by the spirit on each of our journeys.

G-d bless you all.

I have been pretty reluctant to guide mr. Trump, but the world is falling apart, and I need to try and help. The consequences are too dire, we are looking at a possible war with Russia and China combined. The US cannot sustain that. Add to that a rise of IS in Europe, you can imagine the problems of that.

I know, that I was a central advisor for Obama, but we need me in the game again. Otherwise the dangers are too large.

First of all Mr. Trump. You need to get the connection between you and the media all right. There has been a lot of infighting, and that is ok, but the shifting of press secretaries is not good.

My best advise is; do it yourself.

You are so media savvy, that you can easily do it. No problem.

As for Twitter memes, that is just ok. Good to have your own little method to reach the public.

Secondly. You need to get things going with Mr. Putin. I know this is difficult, but look at it this way. If and when the showdown comes with China, you need to be friends with Mr. Putin.

How do you obtain that; you push back on all those infringements and so on that is made in the congress against Mr. Putin. Make it a major point of your presidency.

Thirdly. Make arrangements with India. They are actually on our side, so when we get to the war, WE can be the ones who box in China on two sides.

We should not underestimate China, but we should not overestimate them either.

So there will be a dance around the golden calf in China, and we need to be on top of it.

Luckily the Brits are coming round, just before the show starts. Good for us. Especially if they are able and willing to support us in the war. The Brits have some sophisticated weaponry, and are really good fighters.

But, you need to push back in congress against all that is anti Putin, to make Mr. Putin feel that he has a man in the White house that has his back. He needs to feel that, otherwise he will be angry, and angry Russians are a pretty scary sight.

G-d bless the United States of America.

Well, we are witnessing the great triumph of Zionism these days. We have accomplished peace in the Middle East, more or less. We have made Israel a vehicle for progress, and Israel is at the brink of rebuilding the third temple.

Imagine that, all thanks to the amazing presidentship of Mr. Barack Obama, and his humble servant Asger.

At such a momentous moment, it is perhaps time to look a little back in time, and discuss a bit where Zionism came from, how it evolved and ultimately has triumphed, in a positive sense.

Denmark had a pretty prominent role in the development. Mr. George Brandes was a Danish philosopher who was leading in his time, and supported the project and through him a lot of the humanistic ballast that Mr. Herzl realized was induced into the Zionist idea.

Over time, the Danish angle has been for good or worse. We must admit that the Oslo accords failed. It was, among others, driven by Mr. Herbert Pundik, another Danish humanist. But the Brandes way ultimately succeeded with the work Barack and I did.

The success can also be seen in the support that Israel enjoys by Jews around the world. Very few Jews is against. Off cause we disagree, but the need for a strong Israel is felt by all Jews. If we succeed in building the temple, I think the gamble was right.

Thus Zionism lives and continues to work despite all the dangers that it meets. It is a brilliant success among so many catastrophes, lately the Shoa, the Holocaust. We can maintain that success for eternity, if we hold onto the faith that Mr. Herzl and Brandes prophesied.

That of a nation state made for the Jews. A home all Jews could reach, a home that would put great barriers between the Jews and all who wish to destroy the Jews. A home in Jerusalem.

Not only that, but also a state that could bring light and joy to those around it. Support the great ancient cultures that it is embedded in.

Perhaps realize the ancient dream of a rebounded Middle East.

That is truly a feat done by Mr. Barack Obama, and I truly hope that he gets the credit for it.

G-d bless the will to repeat the great work of Herzl and Brandes in these times as well.

There is some trouble brewing in the Middle East, especially around the Temple mount. The “Palestinians” wish to enforce the guilt of the Jews, and try to provoke a response.

At the heart of this matter lies the choice of the Christians the Jews and the Muslims. What do we want?

We can chose to find peace, or we can chose to fight each other. Why do we continue to chose to fight each other?

It is because we are often wrapped up in our feelings and immediate urge for action. We feel wronged and remember this and that wrongdoing.

This is a choice we can do, do we follow that feeling, or do we try and emancipate ourselves from the immediate reaction, and be a little realistic about the challenges we meet.

Instead of going on with the rush of emotion, we can take a little step back and try to seriously appraise the situation.

The Middle East has a lot to give the entire world, and a lot of the ideas that has been developed in the Middle East are still very active in the world.

I see Israels role as a tool to recreate a spiritual as well as an political turn around for the Middle East.

We got far Barack and I, and we need to build on that frame.

But if we rush in on the emotions of the Palestinians, we miss the bigger picture, that is that of the return of honour not only to the Muslims, but to the entirety of the Middle East, the birth cradle of man.

G-d bless the peace we can find.

Here in the West, we have decided that there is no such thing as spirit or magic. These things have been enlightened away, and we believe only what we can appraise with our senses.

What if we are wrong? What if there is such a thing as G-d or spirit. What if magic really exists, and the whole world of spiritual thought is in effect?

I truly believe, that there is such a thing as G-d, and I live in a world where there is magical creatures, spiritual entities and a life after this.

This is brought to me on a purely rational basis. I do not believe in anything I have not experienced myself. Coming from a scientific world, rationality is what I have been brought up with. I have used these tools to try and understand what we commonly know as metaphysics. That is the scientific discovery of spirituality. A science as all others, with the same demands to scientific methodology and scrutiny as any other science. In fact, I believe that metaphysics demands a higher level of scientific inquiry than humanistics, since it rests on a purely argumentative, theoretical basis. It goes from thesis to thesis through a rigorous dialogue and based on proven arguments. In fact metaphysics has more in common wit its scientific brother physics than human science.

It is the rigourous method that gives it its claim to scientific fame.

For a long time I wanted to go to Oxford to prove my theories. I did that in fact, due to the helping hand of rev. Justin Welby. But I realized, that that did not change science that much. Oxford welcomed me, and I was truly honored.

But the realm of metaphysics, is actually stronger in Denmark than in the UK, with all respect.

That is because of the Niels Bohr institute.

Due to a lot of fighting I had in Copenhagen, i missed a golden opportunity to make a cooperation with the institute I realize now in hindsight.

To truly make that bridge between metaphysics and physics, I need to talk to the amazing scientists at Niels Bohr institute. If this is the result of my recent comeback in Danish intellectuality, then that is the most important.

Because G-d is alive, and not recognizing this, will take all the will we have to do good and leave us without a mover. Without the immovable mover, as Aristotle defines G-d.

G-d bless the will to do good.

Israel as a force of good has actually materialized itself in these days. I know, that there is a lot of discussion regarding the issues of the Temple Mount. But, seriously, if the saudis are actually supporting a peaceful solution, we are one step from actually rebuilding the temple itself.

What will a rebuilding of the temple require? According to the venerable rav Ashlag, it will require a common foundation of all three monotheistic religions. That is Islam, Judaism and Christianity. All should share the same basic religious ideas.

When that comes, the Temple Mount will be more than just a temple for Judaism. It will be a foundation for all three religions that come from Abraham.

This is what the current row is about. Can we make the temple or not.

As a metaphysician, it is obvious to me, that the differences between any man are just something we men made. Spirit or G-d never wanted that. It wanted us to be like it.

In this spirit the temple should be built. As a reflection of G-d, not us imperfect humans.

G-d bless the realization of what G-d wants.

If we look at the world, most of it still runs in the direction Barack and I planned. This is not to diminish Mr. Trump. He has been doing quite well internationally, and should be respected for that. 

But simply to try and understand what is going on in the world right now. When Barack and I started the peace effort in the Middle East. Everything was in shambles and everybody was fighting everybody. Now, there is peace. The last little nugget of true atrocities were finished, more or less, with the fall of Mosul. Thank you again Mattis, very well done. 

In the US, the economy is still in very high gear, and Mr. Trump is still using the ideas Barack and I had. He uses them more forcefully, but he still uses the basic ideas. So in a way, we all live inside of my head. 

I noticed this condition of the world, when there are great minds that make something of the world. Like Tesla, Thoreau, Newton or Steve Jobs.

It all comes down to the character of the idealist or philosopher. The world we create is a reflection of our own character. 

Like Newton. Newton was truly a terrible man. He hated people, and he was very cynical. The world he left us, that of industrialization, was cold and unrepenting. 

Niels Bohr, who oversaw the making of the atomic bomb was a very nice person. So even though he made the bomb, he also left us a world where we actually never used it, on his command. Imagine that. 

With the current crisis in the Democratic Party, please have a look at what Barack and I have done. It HAS changed the world to something else. It reflects our stance on ethics and life. When I was younger, I was more revolutionary. Today as I have matured, I am more inclusive. 

The first phase of my work is what we witness in Europe now. For better or worse, it will go down in a revolution. But that suits the Europeans the best.

In the US however, the depth of what Barack and I have done, is still not realized. 

We made, here it comes, so pay attention: CHANGE, right. 

That change was a true shift away from the Alinsky paradigm to a Trier paradigm. Where Alinsky was for minorities and truly a Frankfurterschool adherent, what Barack and I have done is much more broad and sound. 

We went back to Hegel, fixed the flaws of Marx, installed a whole new economic paradigm, made peace in the Middle East, brushed off the ideas of Democracy. 

In a sense, we made a whole new Social-Democratic paradigm. A more sound one. A deeper one, and we still have not realized this in the Democratic Party. 

We DID make a turn around, we fulfilled the promise, and we should build on the platform. 

G-d bless the will to be strong in our faith. 

I know that we are a little depressed now. Things seem to fall apart, and there is very little hope. 

In this situation we could perhaps look at the victories we have had, and learn from them. First of all, the Obama administration was a resounding success. We did it. 

There has been little criticism of what we did. We did it by trying to find new ways for Social-democratic ideas. And we succeeded. 

What did we do right? We reinterpretated the ideas of socialism and democracy. 

Socialism was brought to a much more spiritual place, and we tried to ally ourselves with business instead of alienating ourselves. 

In practice a middle leaning political platform. 

In the field of democracy, we went full tilt. We fought for the arabs in the Arab spring, and we tried to fight for democracy in the face of Islamic state. 

This created a huge league for democracy that Mr. Trump has inherited and managed to strengthen. 

The strength of the foreign policy ideas is evident in the fact that Mr. Trump continues to reap the benefit of it. 

He has managed to continue and does it really well. 

So we did do a turn around, but we still lost the election. 

What we can do however, is to continue the reflection in the issues. 

Healthcare is better if it is served with a community spirit, right ?

What is the meaning of healthcare if it is not to help people in need?

So on and so forth. Again let mr. Zuckerberg pay me a ticket, I can get the discussiongroups started. 

Do not lose hope, do not despair. We can do it. 

G-d bless the will to remain strong in spirit and community. 

With the continuing focus on the negative aspects of the Trump administration, I believe we are missing the opportunity to discuss what really went wrong with our own campaign. 

I believe that I am pretty good at campaigning. I just won with May in the U.K., but we still haven’t figured out what went wrong in the American election. Pointing the finger at Mr. Putin doesn’t help us really. 

I believe that there is a basic reason we may have overlooked. We went too far away from the center. 

Even though ms. Clinton did reach for the center in her politics, her political career and some of the players she brought along were not centrist. Among them Huma Abedin. 

And then there is the fact that the electorate likes to change from time to time. Try something new. 

That has nothing to do with the performance of the party leadership. That is just a part of the mechanic. 

We have had a democratic leader with a rather conservative politics, but still he was colored in his skin. That was a big leap for many Americans. Having a female president was just too much. 

Americans do not like to experiment just too much. 

So they chose the closest they could get to the normal white couple. 

My point is. What we should consider are these macro developments that has little to do with the platform we are running on. I mean Mr. Trump is very much continuing with the ideas that Barack and I came up with. 

So soul searching is not just about criticizing the opponent in politics. It is also understanding the macromovements. 

Mr. Biden we could have won with, because he was the “normal” choice. 

G-d bless the will to have the ability to learn from our mistakes. 

People from the U.S. usually feel that they do not understand Russians much. That is quite normal considering the historical rivalry and fighting between the two great nations. 

But, seen from a Danish perspective things might not be so different after all. Please let me explain what the Russians are, and how they ended up being who they are. 

Russians or “Rus” came from the Scandinavian peninsula a thousand years ago. At that time it was quite the rave to go to the Byzantine empire to serve as bodyguards of the Byzantine emperor. We Vikings were, rightfully I might add, seen as the best fighters, so the emperor wanted a hird of our good men. 

Many came home with very beautiful clothes and a lot of riches. 

This was alproximately at the same time as Denmark and England was under the same king, that of Canute.

The route down to the Byzantine empire was along the rivers of Europe. So we sailed in our longboats down the rivers, and we noticed some nice arable land along the route. 

Especially in Ukraine, there was a lot of nice land, so we decided to settle there. In the beginning it went quite well, but that all changed at the time of the Hun invasion. 

The Huns were extremely savage. They burned down whole peoples and they, more or less, destroyed the Viking cities in Ukraine. 

Imagine that. You live happily in your land, as the Americans do now, all of a sudden a vile conqueror decend on all your peaceful cities and burn them to the ground, rapes all your daughters, kill you indescriminately. 

This really changed the Russians, in fact the Russians never truly got over that abuse. This is why Russians are so sceptical towards foreign powers who try to impose their will on them and have this deeply ingrained suspicion towards conquerors. 

It has served then well many times. Russians single handedly took out Napoleon and Hitler. Imagine that. 

Do not wake the Russian bear they say. In other words, Russians always are ready to fight to the bitter end. They know that there is no depth to human depravity, and will fight rather than surrender. 

But they still remember where they come from, and the good things we develop here in Europe, they learn from and try to use to the best of their ability. 

Like the rise of spirituality that I have been a part of. 

So in fact Russians are like Americans. They have had their frontiertime, their longing for their roots. But they are just an older wave of migrants, and they are wiser to the evils of the world. 

But deep down Russians are as freedomloving, proud warriors. I might add with a great warm heart. 

Mr. Putin is of a generation that look upon Europe for good things, he is not a generation that wants war. In fact he just wants to be left in peace. 

G-d bless the peace we CAN find. 

In Egypt, there is a rise in anti Christian sentiment. Especially the Copts, who is an ancient Christian group of worship has been hit hard. 

The current government of Al-Sisi tries it best to protect the Copts, but the problems persists. Especially ISIS related gangs seems to be targeting the poor Copts with suicide bombers and the like. 

It may seem a little far off, but terror attacks we experience here in Europe and in the US is far worse for the Copts. 

Let us not forget, that the Copts is an ancient church, that has been instrumental in many amazing feats of development of Christian thought. It still retains some of the most sacred Christian sites, among them the place where Moses was found. 

Connecting to the Copts has been a boon to the Catholic faith, and will continue so. 

The Copts are a sign, that the Middle East is actually a place where Muslims and Christians can live side by side. A project mr. Al-Sisi, thank you great pharao, has tried to make. 

Why? Because otherwise the endless cycle of violence will eventually pit all Muslims or at least Sunni Muslims against the rest of the world. 

In this case, I believe that Mr. Al-Sisi has a crucial role to play. But he can only do that if we really get behind him, and support him for his crucial role in the development of a peace. 

Please support his protection of the Copts, they are a wondrous people, wrought with disaster, but still holding on to the dignity of their faith. 

We can learn a lot from them, and we should support them, and all the rest of the persecuted Christians in the Middle East. 

G-d bless the peace we CAN find.

You know, I am really amazed at the performance Mr. Trump did in Poland. Seriously, hands down, that was a class act. No doubt about it. You just hit all the right buttons, in a balanced, supportive, avant-garde speech that will go down in history as the first move of an American president in the war against ISIS in Europe. This is the horn blowing of a real leader. 

I never saw it coming, it was that amazing. 

I ran against mr. Trump, then he asked me to guide him, I have done that to the best of my ability, and the thing is, it is working quite well. 

The fight with China is all but prepared, mentally as well as military tech wise. The fight with ISIS in Europe is ready. Everything is in the finest order. 

When I think about all those years back when I started the work first with the resistance here in Denmark, then with Barack, I intuitively knew that we would make to here. I never really doubted it. I just knew it in my bones. When there is trouble on our doorstep we have this ability we of the Vikings, to look for the best, and let him lead us. 

It is one of the secrets why we have survived, we have this deeply ingrained way of organizing ourselves, across political differences, across nations, just doing the wisest thing. 

Now we are here, at the dawn of the fight. 

Let us pray. 

Dear G-d. 

Please let the mourning that will come be light. Please let the bloodletting be scarce. Please let all the fighting be done with the best possible and most humane end in mind. Never let us fight for money, but for that of freedom. 

Please attend our needs, secure our borders, help those who are weak, black as well as white. 

Do not pressure yourself on us because we are in need, but because we wish to let your will be done. 

Please, let this fighting be as mild as humanly possible. 

Let our league be strong and let us stop the bickering. 

Please, when it all ends, let the peace be everlasting. 

Thank you, and let us all say Amen. 

I really fought for Ms. Clinton in the last American election. I was, all in all, one of the prime strategic advisers Ms. Clinton had. 

When we lost, I kind of lost my own swagger, it was the first election I have ever lost, and it was the fifth one I had had a part in. I won with Barack four years earlier. But that is the way it is. You win some and you lose some. I won with the conservatives in U.K., though only slightly. 

But that is how democracy works, it is the will of the people, and sometimes you are not the one the people wants. It can change again. 

But to blame the loss of the election on Mr. Putin because he manipulated is truly wrong. I must know, I have a friendship with Mr. Putin of sorts. 

Yes he is a an ex. KGB spy, yes his friends are KGB, but that does not imply that Kremlin still attacks the US with disinformation campaigns. 

I know what a disinformation campaign looks like, I have just fought one down in Denmark. 

The American election does not wear the signs of a disinformation campaign. 

Now Mr. Putin is a vile fox, he is a fighter and he does use techniques of clouding his actions. But he also a person who has taken his country from a Communist rule to that of a Christianity. 

When he points to the Jews as their, or our, experience as scapegoats. He is right. 

I hereby extent the support of the Jews to Mr. Putin. If you feel like one us, you will have our support. 

G-d bless mother Russia. 

Great literature usually carries a claim to formulate what is not conscious. The subconscious truths that we all agree upon, but are not ready to speak openly about. 

You can shine with the light of the moon or the light of the sun. The moonlight is usually the light of great novels. The philosopher however must be the one who are able to formulate the unconscious like the sun. Openly, brazenly and therefor with the strongest of power. 

There has been a proverb of the Trump administration, and especially Mr. Bannon; “winter is coming” the saying goes. 

It is a reference to the motto of the Starks of Winterfell in the saga of George R.R. Martin in Game of Thrones.

I have wondered about that reference, it is so strong. When I was a kid, the stories really enraptured me with the strength of characters, the depth of storyline. But I did not understand the subconscious reference of that giant wall that Martins were talking about, the monsters seeping through the cracks, the corruption of the city in the middle, and Jon Snow, the orphan trying to stop the wall from crumbling. 

Well since Martins is British, it seems to me, that the wall is the crumbling borders, the monsters the migrants and the corrupt center Bruxelles. 

Winter is coming, and there is some truth in that, and not unless we realize that and plan accordingly do we man that wall truly, or rather look at things in a clear light. 

Literature has that gift sometimes, to arm us with truth. 

Not all migrants are monsters, but some are, and we need to man that wall in order to stop the flow of monsters. 

But we also need to man the inner walls, the Millwals and be brave. 

G-d bless the vigilant. 

I have been neglecting the US for some time here on Rubicon, mostly because I have been really busy with Denmark and the UK. 

Put on hold but certainly not forgotten. Anyway, I hope that some of the things that is developed for the UK, can be used in the US as well. 

There is the question of the next generation of Democratic leaders. It is a little difficult for me to really follow the trends there. I am basically too far away, but, as always, I do my best. 

I have been thinking a lot about mr. Mark Zuckerberg. I can relate a lot to Mark. We have very much the same background. Both grew up in secular more or less Jewish family, IT, and the succes we have had with each our professions. 

Here are my recommendations. First of all. Politics is so tough. Much tougher than you would imagine. There is a lot of tactics, you have to be realistic about the pressure it puts on you and your family. 

But, that is what it demands. At the other hand, it gives you an opportunity to really make a difference. It is also much more challenging than IT. 

Not that IT is not challenging, it is, and MUCH better payed. But the skills you need to fight in politics are different. You need to be a fighter, have a superior character, have depth of knowledge, be a very good and loyal friend, and then you need to feel the burning desire to make a better world. 

Anyway Mark, my door is always open. Invite me to your house, or pop by. I would like to help you, as all the other contenders. You may have to pay the ticket for the US however, considering the low pay of bloggers these days.

The US in general is in a much better position than ten years ago, and we will manage. 

G-d bless the US of A.

To truly understand the depth the change that we may be able to carry forward in the UK, one needs to understand the problems that we are facing. 

The socialist doctrine of free movement and free everything is not a viable way forward. 

What is viable however, is to understand what the shortfalls of said system has, and then remedy where it is not working and find a new way. 

Ok. Have a look at it this way. Nobody really knows what socialism is. The only ones who truly had an idea about it, were the first socialists around Karl Marx and perhaps the first generation around Lenin. Why? Because Marx wrote in a typical German way, which is almost impossible to understand. 

Being Danish, and that is what people call very German in many ways, I do understand it to a certain degree. But only after checking the sources of Marx do I really understand it, and then also the problems of Marxist thinking. 

Here it comes. Marx made a replica of Sparta, or rather he was very inspired by Sparta. 

There is however one problem. Marx did understand the classical sources, but he never went into absolute nerd with the old texts. He has read Lucretius, a bit of Plato, but not all the texts that describes Sparta, and not all the texts that describes Athens, the Democratic counterweight to Sparta. 

So he missed quite a few things. What he really missed are the following:

1. According to Lucretius a communist society needs to be closed, not open. This is important to know when we talk wealthfarestate. This is why EU does not work for countries like Denmark, it simply ruins the wealthfarestate. 

2. Sparta had checks and balances internally in Sparta. There were two kings, and there was a council called the Ephors, who advised the king. This is important to understand in the light of the communist states that evolved into corrupt kingdoms. A socialist system will not work unless there is a check on the power. 

3. Sparta had gods and goddesses as any other polis of the time. They had a fervor for law, almost as a G-d. 

Now, there was a lot of criticism of Sparta in the days it actually worked, something we can learn from today. First and foremost, it was criticized for being too insulate. That was why it eventually died out. Spartans had too few children. Why? Because basically there was no meaning in having children. The state took them over anyway. The same problem is very true for the socialist or communists countries of today. Especially in Western Europe, where the wealthfarestates have had a tremendous decline in birthrate. It is not because people are generally full of weltschmerz, but because the system makes it like that. 

If you do not have a wealthfarestate, then people have more children, because then the family becomes the social security. 

The other thing that was a huge problem in the antiques, was the Crypteia, the secret police of Sparta. It was loathed, and it was used to dominate and tyrranize the helots, the slaves of the Spartans. 

The same problem is prevalent in the modern socialist systems, it creates an incentive for a huge secret service, and ends up being policestates. 

With all of this in mind, we can see, that there is room for a Spartan like society, they were extremely brave and were generally seen as uncorrupted and really good fighters. 

But we need to be careful not to make the same mistakes as the ancient Spartans did, and we need to make sure we do not simply make the same mistakes as the last generations of communists did. 

This means, as a conclusion, that we need to make a wealthfarestate, but run on spiritual, national principles. We also need to secure that the legislative system retains its checks and balances when it comes to the use and control of power. The democratic system needs to be the foundation. All the other principles of state; the rule of law, enlightenment by the press and so on, needs to be supported and encouraged as well. 

THEN we can have a wealthfarestate, that actually works and supports the society and system. 

That will bring a better society. 

G-d bless the will to make a better world.

The election, and the fall out of the drama, is finally over. 

It is time to wrap it up, and talk a little about the potential political growth that we realized in the election. 

First of all, we need to do other things than just Brexit. Yes it is a humongous task, but focusing only on that, will potentially cost us the next election. We need to do a multipronged strategy. 

One of the great things in the election, was the talk about the NHS and the wealthfarestate in general. I know, that communism was spread by the KGB, we have just have a rerun on some of the methods here in Denmark. But communism has good things in it as well. 

The best being a kind of state security wrapped around all members of the society. 

This we HAVE to work on. Someone should convene in Oxford, invite rev. Brian Mountford and talk about the Anglican Church and its role as a moral base under the wealthfarestate. Talk about the caring for the weakest of the nation, talking about doctors, teachers, policemen and all that support the nation. 

This will give the Anglican Church a way to be a part of the society again in an important way. 

There should be space for other beliefsystems, but the church should be leading in this process. 

A good task for a vicars daughter. 

Secondly, we need to work on terrror. I know that it is both sides and so on. But the best way to stop terror, is to get rid of the jihadis. Then the right wing will stop. 

There has been talk about internment of islamists. I think this is too harsh. Locking them up will stop the problem, but they are young people, with a life ahead of them. They should not be locked up. What I would recommend, is repatriation. Most of them are not citizens of the UK, so they should be asked to leave the country, and if that is not possible, forced to leave. 

This will make a situation where the UK has to negotiate with different countries to take their citizens back. Well, that is possible, that is basically a matter of will and ability to negotiate. 

A good project for an ambitious conservative. Deliver on this, and that is a huge boon to the party.

Thirdly, there is Brexit. As I see it, the real challenge lies in satisfying DUP. They will not accept any kind of soft Brexit, and they are pretty fond of Mr. Farage. The negotiations on the EU side are really unrealistic, and they are not holding the cards. Drive a serious bargain, and if they do not comply, just define the rules yourself. 

G-d bless the UK, and thank you for a good fight. We won, but it was pretty close this time.

The endless cycle of war has finally begun in the UK. That of attack and retaliation. This is how war works. 

If the one side keeps attacking, and no one answers, in the end someone will do it in a primitive way. 

As the conflict unfolds, people will be forced to choose sides. This is what we know from Thucydides, a war will eventually pit people against each other. That goes for the muslim as well for the democratic side. 

In this situation, the state needs to up its game. If it does not deliver on the war on terror, people will just take the matters in their own hands. Condemning it will not do anything, people are too angered to care about condemnation. This is war, no words will change it. It is a hot war, not a cold War, so it is not a spywar. 

The only responsible thing to do in this situation, is to go hard, VERY hard on the terrorists. That is IS afiliated organizations and the like. Close down the mosques, and untangle the vast network of Islamist terrorists.

It may sound as a callous response to the Finsbury mosque attack. And yes, those Muslims that were there by chance are not necessarily Islamist, and for those, it was wrong to target them. Just as wrong as killing innocent Londoners. 

My point is just, that the state is loosing control over the situation, and the only way it can regain control, is by closing all the terrorist mosques, repatriate all who are terrorist and not citizens and so on. 

The lack of action on the part of the government is the cause of this situation. 

If the security forces do not step in and do something, the situation will spiral out of control. 

That is how humans think and work, and we should understand it and try to take the initiative instead of leaving it to the street. Because that is a dangerous situation indeed. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom, and may it prevail in these very difficult times. 

There has been a lot of discussion on the Wealtfarestate and the problems this part of the country is in. 

Let me clear, more money is not the answer. Already it is extremely expensive. What will work however, is the ATTITUDE towards the wealthfarestate. 

The basic problem with the wealthfarestate is firstly a widespread demoralization. Secondly it is the priority. The wealthfarestate is, in principle, for all. But in a society where all needs more and more. One needs to prioritize. 

The prioritization needs to be founded in something. 

The philosophical challenge to the current socialist wealthfarestate, is that it does not make sense. 

Marx idea was to copy the principles of Sparta. But he did not understand Sparta, and he did not respect the sage wisdom of the founder of Sparta, Lycurgus. 

Lycurgus was quite clear about the constitution of Sparta. It was to make Sparta a completely closed state. Because he knew, that an open state could not carry the community. 

Sparta was also extremely ideological, it was FOR law. So it did have virtue as a basic motor. 

If we look at the current wealthfarestate with this in mind. We can see that in order to make it work we need two things;

1. A principle to drive it.

2. A realistic set of borders to guard the frame of the wealthfarestate. 

My idea, written in the book ‘The Freestate’, is to go back to the principle that Marx left, that of Hegel. To Hegel a nation was inspired by the grace of spirit. ‘Gott mitt uns’ as the saying was in Germany. This works. We can see it in hospitals where doctors work for the grace of goodness and spirit. We can see it in the schools, where good teachers has a calling. We can see it in the way a spiritual system PRIORITIZES the resources. It goes to the ones who needs it the most. 

This should be the guiding star of a renewed discussion on wealthfare. Who needs it. And lest not forget. Help is only good, if it makes the person that get the help selfreliant. 

As the venerable Pope Francis said. The communists stole the flag of the church. Well, let us steal it back. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom, and may it prevail in these difficult times.      

As the conflicts with the islamists are on the rise, the measures to use against them must meet the challenge they pose. 

If it is truly is an act of terrorism burning down the sky scraper of London, well, the true horror of the foe is fully revealed. We saw it in Syria with the Yazidi girls, Christians being persecuted and other atrocities. But we are not that used to it in our own homes. 

What we did see however, were the sheer and incredible bravery of the firefighters. Such resilience in a dangerous situation. Conflict brings both the worst and the best up in us. 

There will be more, but we will NOT sheer away from trouble. We will meet it, again and again as the heroes we are when we meet such incredible danger. 

We will never surrender, never. 

G-d bless the city of London, and may it prevail in such difficult times. 

Now, there is a hung parliament. This is very unusual for British politics, but in Denmark, this is the way it works. 

It is like this. A PM for a coalition, will have to serve the entire coalition. That is really the difficult thing. Because a PM from one party has to include the most important parts of other parties as well. This craves an extremely competent politician, the PM has to be extremely good at making all parts of the coalition happy.

The trick is to take the best qualities of each party, and strengthen them. Add to this, a look on where the common interest is, and then you make an alliance. 

It is fair enough if you cannot get everything through in a hung parliament, because the votes are not there for it. 

In the case with the cooperation between DUP and the Tories, the common ground is pretty obvious. Hard Brexit, security, and a common interest in strengthening the British Union. 

Since DUP is more conservative than the Tories, they will, as a consequence draw the Tories to the right. This has a lot of implications for the Brexit talk, the cat is already out of the bag, as we see it. 

The way forward would be, to sit down and make a new deal with DUP on Brexit, and see where that will get the negotiation. By mathematical logic, it will mean at much harder Brexit than the one David Davies wanted to negotiate. But that is the way with a hung parliament, parties need to feel they get a part of the negotiations in relations to their size. 

Tories is the big party, but in order to compromise, DUP needs to get a few things in as well. 

It can be done, but it will require a lot of discussion to find a solution. 

At the end of the day, a good compromise could be to accept the open borders in Ireland and then go for harder borders to France. That would probably satisfy DUP. 

The great question is; what about the EU citizens in the UK. But not only that, what about all the foreigners in the UK.

In a difficult security situation, one needs to be sure that the citizens in the country are actually loyal to the system. The amount of serious malcontents are very high, and as a consequence these malcontents needs to go back to their own country. This will be the end of the matter. I know that it will be difficult to set in motion now. But the mechanics of war will eventually lead to that result if we want it or not. That is the wisdom of Thucydides, the classic Athenian historian. 

So, in order to prepare for the next few years, we need to get the Brexit talks over as fast as possible, and then start tackling the terror as fast as possible. 

If we get control over the borders, we then have a chance at actually securing the process to happen orderly and done by the state. 

Difficult times indeed, but we CAN do it. 

G-d bless Ms. May, and may she prevail.

Ok, here a fortnight after the election, things seem to have unfurled more or less the way I saw it. The DUP is much more conservative than the conservatives, and draws the Tories to the right.

It is not good if this means control of gays, abortion and so on. But as a staunch supporter of a hard Brexit and a supporter of a serious crackdown on the islamists, this is good news.

In fact the position of Ms. May has actually improved considerably, because she can now point to the DUP when the backbenchers call for less pressure.

In fact, it has strengthened Ms. May overall. Yes, there is little tradition for a hung government in the UK, but in this strange coincidence, it is actually not that bad.

If we start crunching the numbers, we also see, that actually what happened was, that the UKIPers failed, not May. She got MORE votes overall than Cameron. I mean, how can that possible be a loss?

The problem was for the Conservatives, that UKIP votes were abandoning the cause in droves. This released a lot of the old Labourvotes back to Labour. So all the hoolabaloo about young voters and so is just that hoolabaloo. The real reason for the Labour turnaround was the UKIP collapse.

Mr. Farage made a huge mistake in losing the reins too early. It also tell the Tories, that a good UKIP in the race will, by mathematics, not mean an increased UKIP number of MP but Tory MPs. Strange world we are living in.

So by celestial providence, the power ended up where it was intended in the first place; in a place where Westminster has to work for a hard Brexit.

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

There has been much discussion on the manifesto, and the how’s and why’s of this election vehicle. 

I tend to agree, as probably all have, that it wasn’t that great of a paper to work from. It seems to me, that the Tory leadership was so fixed on Brexit, that they forgot about all the other challenges that is in for the country. 

There are many, and I believe that Ms. May will have to do a multi pronged strategy. Working on a lot of issues at once; migration, border control, Brexit, terrorattacks, remodeling of the wealthfarestate, economics, education and family strengthening. 

Anyway there is a lot to do, but the good news is, if you follow the ideas I have, there is an integrated system in it. It is not made without regards to the strategy and architecture of political development. Everything is thought through, is based on an intimate knowledge of political principles, from the classical times to today. 

There is only one little thing I may be worrying about; why didn’t the writers of the manifesto know about the intricacies of economics that David Cameron introduced in his tenure. 

There is a lack of learning in the political establishment that is dangerous. 

I think it is because my books have not been made readily available to the academics. They should, in order to enable them to make good policies. It is philosophy and maybe a bit winded, but any serious political development should be based on solid theory in my opinion. I will try and contact Oxford and see if I can get someone to publish the theory, because I believe it is of vital importance. The mistake of the manifesto shows this. 

For me it is not about the honour. I am fiercely independent, and prefer working outside the system. But the system has a role to play with an independent philosopher as me. Maybe not to hire me, in fact I would make a lousy professor, but to educate the academics in the theory I provide. It is truly needed.

Apart from that, well done everybody. It was a last minute, desperate fight, but we did it. 

We also need to applause UKIP, they selflessly gave us room. They practically bought the Tory win by sacrificing themselves. That is rare in any political fight. I have never seen it before, and we really need to pay respect to that sacrifice and listen to their input. 

All in all, a fierce battle, but we won. 

G-d bless the victory we got, and then let us be humble about it, and reach out for a broad coalition.

There is a rising interest in a cooperation between the right and the left of the aisle on different issues. The main being, if we actually listen to the constituency, the dismantling of the wealthfarestate. 

It is not necessarily in the historic interest of the Tories to dismantle the wealthfarestate, there has been a tradition for a certain responsibility from the government towards especially struggling people, after all Mr. Churchill was the one to initiate the wealthfarestate.

It is not up to me to decide, but I can contribute with a theoretical examination of the problems of the current political landscape. 
My first impression of National socialism was by talking to one of my heroes in the resistance movement. My good friend Per, Alias Tom had a lot of knowledge about National socialism, since he fought the bastards. 

He said that Nation socialism was the strongest political system he knew. The point being, that if you do socialism in a national frame, the stability is extremely strong. You can actually see this in North Korea which in practice is National socialism, since the socialistic system there is extremely closed and concerned with borders. 

If you have a look at international socialism, that is the basis of EU, you have a complete different picture. This is not working, and never has. 

Because in order to have a communal state, where everybody shares everything, you need a high degree of control, absolute control in fact. 

Now, we have returned to a classic socialistic ideology with Mr. Corbyn. he calls for a state that controls certain parts of the intercommunal live. Education, social wealthfare and so on. 

The discussion has been a bit superficial, because where does that leave the Brexit discussion. If the Socialists want free movement, then there will be no free education and so on. 

The problems, seen from a Socialist perspective is, that Marx defined Communism as international, and therefor most socialist are not that keen on accepting a national socialism. 

But however you turn it around, it does work with international socialism, it has been tested and it did not work. 

This puts Ms. May at an ideal negotiation position in relation to the wealtfarestate negotiations, because I suppose these have to be initiated, we have to listen and serve the people. 

Because May has no problem with a national agenda, on contrary she supports it, and with DUP on board, the patriotic position is strengthened. 

She can deliver a wealthfarestate that actually works. 

She can do that, by stopping the open borders, stop all the abuse of the wealthfarestate by certain parts of the migrant community, fight for more working jobs and make those jobs British. Mr. Cameron had a lot of succes with that. 

It all comes back to the community. I happen to believe, that that community should be based on more than just complete random relations. A community is to me, and perhaps to Theresa May, something more, in fact it is, if it is good, a spiritual thing. 

Perhaps this idea could base the community we are talking about, a community where the cooperation is based on more than the simple material needs, and then in a Hegelian way Spirit. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom. 

Well, well, well, who would have though that. A hung parliament, and the pollsters, once again, had it all wrong.

Anyway. If we look at the issues discussed and the outcome, this was a very difficult election, not at least because there were two terror attacks in the midst of it.

This skewered the whole election, because the momentum that Ms. May needed was destroyed over and over again. In that sense the terrorist did at least win by setting the agenda.

Instead of talking Brexit we ended up talking security and austerity, two issues that are actually not handled that well by Ms. May.

I am not here to point fingers, but to try, honestly, to analyse what happened.

As the result is ticking in, we see that the Tories are dependent on Ireland, this is interesting, and we will see what that leads to. But since the DUP are hardcore Brexiteers, that would actually mean a HARDER Brexit strategy than what Ms. May started with. That is also interesting, none saw that coming.

The overall picture however is, that people do want Brexit, you can see that in Scotland, where the independence movement has receded and in Ireland as well.

In fact, that has strengthened the Brexit narrative quite a lot.

One thing however that should be abundantly clear however is the fact, that the austerity measures that the German EU pressed for are not viable anymore. Austerity has to be softened and less deconstruction of the scrambling wealthfarestate should be done.

At the end of the day, people want a patriotic Britain with a strong wealthfarestate. That is the message that the people are trying to get through to the politicians.

In fact, that is not a repeal of the current Brexit course, because a strong wealthfarestate is not possible within the EU. So if Labour wants to cling on to the straw that has been made available, campaigning for a soft Brexit will go against the will of the people.

Interesting indeed, as the politicians get on with the analysis, as I presume they will over the next couple of days, a more clear picture will emerge, and that picture will be, that we have a vote of nation socialism. Not Nazism, but a wealthfarestate within a sovereign nation. That was unexpected.

G-d bless the United Kingdom and may we find our way.

There has been a lot of discussion on the current development, and that the UK treads new ground. Tackling the islamists is perhaps difficult, and how will it end and so on. 

Just to be clear on this, since it is basically my ideas we are working with. There is absolutely nothing new in the ideas as such, all is based on well proven philosophy, that stems from the Athenian philosopher Aristotle. The combination is off cause new, since Islam did not exist in the times of Aristotle, but the principles of Democracy and how it relates to threats are the same. 

Add to this, the strategy has been well tested, on the battle field in the Middle East. Here it has brought wonders I never dreamed about. After Mr. Trump has toured the Middle East, thank you Mr. Trump, even the Arabs are actively chipping in, pushing Quatar out of the alliance since Quatar is the main sponsor of radicalism. 

This means, in practice, that there will be no significant international backlash if a serious effort to trample down ISIS and likeminded organizations is done. On the contrary, it will be seen as a significant push for the alliance. 

On the ground we have also some serious experience with fighting ISIS. They are good, even brilliant in their use of the very limited resources they have. We should not understimate them. They are inventive, versatile, creative, dedicated and truly believe in their cause. 

We are, at the other hand, demoralized, fat and absolutely ruined by the Cold War. The political correctness has been eating us up, and we are almost without any faith in anything. 

So it is truly a David and Goliath fight, problem is, WE are the Goliath.

But we need to turn that boat around, and reinvent ourselves. Get healthy and sound again. 

We are at the end of the river at the heart of Darkness, and Mr. Kurz is wispering; we are all going to die. 

Turning the boat around, and leaving that Heart of Darkness, and fight our way up of the river is going to be tough. But there is no choice, if we want to survive. 

The turnaround will be painful, and yes, there will be rivers of blood, and yes it is the effect of demoralization and fatigue. But Mr. Frodo did climb that hill and did face the evil of Mordor, so we DO have that resilience and courage to face the evil in our midst. 

If you want to delve into the philosophy and ideas behind the fight we are fighting, Please look here. 

The Freestate

G-d bless the lion of London bridge. 

In these devastating and difficult times, we need guidance. Not just heavenly guidance, but, as I see it, guidance from a certain aspect of spirit.

We are entering a war, that is quite obvious, and this war, if we want to end up with peace, has to be conducted in a very intelligent and planned manner. With this, I will be honest about whom I see as my spiritual mentor. St. Michael, archangel Michael. The leader of the free spirits, and the general of the soldiers of light. The healer and the warrior. 

I believe, that in his arms we have a way out of this destructive war we are entering. 

Let us be honest. No kind of PC talk will actually get us out of this calamity. The Muslim Brotherhood is deeply entrenched in the UK. So is Hamas, ISIS, Al-Queda and a number of the radical Islamic organizations that are fighting the jihadi war worldwide. 

In this situation, no amount of cowardice or disregard for the truth will work on our behalf. Only the honest understanding of the matter, and the action that will truly lead to the reduction of these organizations. 

In this area, I believe we need a spiritual guide, that understands war, but has peace as the aim. 

More PC will not get us anywhere, but an honest discussion will. 

It is not all Muslims who fight our ways, but those who do are Muslims, and we need to accept that and act accordingly. With all the tools of the state. Vigilantly, intelligently, forcefully and dedicated. 

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

Here we go again, another terror attack. This time done with simple tools, and so easy to do. All you have to do is to have knife, and then start aiming at people. 

We are so vulnerable against these attacks. 

It is on high time, that we stop treating these cases as police matter, and start treating them as they obviously are; war. 

The great differences between police work and military work are the differences on methods.The police will work with less severe methods. Put people in jail, try to prevent people from being warriors and so on. 

The military will work on disrupting the organizations of the enemy, take down as many as possible and so on. 

In a way war is much more simple than police work. 

When you have war, usually the two parties coalesce around a political or religious standpoint. We fight for justice and Democracy, they fight for the Caliphate and sharia law. 

We both believe in the quality of our own system. 

But, to be honest, the reason why we like it, is because it is our own. 

The war does not start with the competition of political systems, it starts with material competition. We compete over land, resources and so on. 

This is a fact we need to realize, and act upon. We have an enemy, who is competing with us on resources. They are not wanting to share, even though we have been so naive to believe that people who are a part of a often, but not always, violent religion, would sing the same naive songs as we do. 

Wake up, they do not. They sing songs of conquest and domination. It does not add up. 

So far, the strategies of the police has been to try and cast a net over all the jihadis, but not do much otherwise. When they were on the brink of a terrorattack, the would be caught and put to prison. In prison they would, or they do meet with other jihadis, who control the prison, and therefor they are not taught good manners and end up better citizens. No, they end up even more radicalized. 

At the same time, the police has, meticulously, trampled down any kind of discussion on these issues. If you dared to tackle the taboo, you were basically put on a death list. As Mr. Tommy Robinson can attest to. Maybe he is not right in all his ideas, but at least he has the guts to discuss it. We need an open, serious discussion on these issues to tackle them. 

This has, more or less, left the entire discussion to me, because, I am the only intellectual who is so openly Democratic, and open about it, so we have reserved a little space for me. But this is too meagre and little. We need a much broader and more serious discussion on these issues. 

All in all, the increased funding of the police has not led us closer to any solutions, but just postponed the inevitable. 

There is no silver bullet, but we need to change course. Because what we are doing right now, is not good enough, and it will only get worse. 

We need to realize, that the police cannot handle the problem, and we need to hand it on to those who know something about war. The military. 

The military is not an uncivilized part of the state, it is a highly professional, extremely competent part of society. They know what they are dealing with, we have been fighting these buggers for many years. 

Yes it will be bloody, yes it will crave sacrifices, but not realising the war, is much, much worse. 

And if someone wants to get reelected, she needs to change tactics. The electorate have had enough, it is time to change tactics. 

I will be here to guide you, as I have done in the rest of the ISIS fighting, so it will not be uncivilized. 

So, COME ON! We need to look this monster in the eyes and start fighting it. COME ON!

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

I order to realize some true progress in the election in the UK, which, but the way is on track again. One also needs to address the question of economy. 

The novel way mr. Cameron addressed this issue, has given a lot of good results in terms of economy and real jobs. That is what is needed. Real jobs and a prosperous economy. 

It all harks back to the loyalty of the producers with the nation. Something the UK is truly blessed with. 

If you look at the Brexit discussion, which is based on an economic discussion. Then wealth will be an issue. 

But wealth is not only created by having market access, it is also created by having something to sell. 

Having something to sell, will require someone who makes something. 

The easy fix is then to let the state make things, but the hard fix is to make a free environment, where private initiative will lead to loyal production environment. This is where patriotism comes in, and is very important. And this is where the opportunity for a conservative government is truly there. Patriotism is good when it is about supporting your local community. 

So this is not about cancelling free trade, but about having something to chip in on, in the free trade. 

G-d bless the will to support your nation.

​To understand what is happening with the EU right now, one has to understand the reason to the problems. 

This is not to point fingers, but simply to try and analyze the problems. 

When Dion, the supporter of the Syracusan aristocracy and friend of Plato was exiled from Syracuse in 500 BC, he tried to retake Syracuse. (A small greek state of classic times).

At the time this was seen as impossible, because the Syracusean army was very, very strong. Syracuse was a tyranny. 

But he went to Syracuse anyway with almost no help, and managed to turn around the military, the aristocracy and win over the tyranny. 

What is the learning from that example, well as Cornelius Nepos, the author of the historical treatise I am writing comments; no state can survive without the love of the people. 

This is where the problems of the EU really hits the mark. 

It is reviled by the people, and rightly so. The EU has time and again gone in the opposite direction of what the people want, and is suffering for that tyrannical behavior. 

This is a solid learning all politicians in Europe should take to heart. The political elite needs the love of the people to rule. Without it, the only other way is tyranny. I think it would be wise to really consider the ethical question that confronts all politicians of Europe. Would they continue down the path of tyranny, or, as Dion, consider the virtue and benefit of the people as their interest.

Democracy is a messy thing. Sometimes you do not get what you want. But it is much better than tyranny, because it is balanced. The different interest has a peaceful way to calibrate. 

In the US the elite is lectured by the people. That is good, in the sense, that we should truly listen to what they say, instead of, arrogantly, assume that we are right. 

The combined intellect of the people is always supreme to that of a few elitist aristocrats, whatever they may be. 

At the end of the day, politics is about being humble to the opinions that is around us, and act on them. Serve the people, not the other way around. 

G-d bless the will to be honest and strong in the face of any tyrannical development.

Europe is changing whether we want it or not, war is coming. It is already here. Not realizing this, is like the Second World War, just delaying the inevitable.

Hitler has already blown the horn, and he is moving, with intent on Poland. As in the Second World War, what we need is not another Chamberlain, we need a Churchill. Someone who has intent is intelligent, thinks about the Empire, and has the sheer courage to meet the enemy.

This is what the Manchester attack was all about, calling the Winston Churchill out.

As Mr. Churchill said, when he made his famous speeches. We need the Anglo Saxon words. The strong, often vicious words, that are unpolished and are remnants of the old ways. The way of the olden Gods.

I will give you a lesson about that, seen from the perspective of my own school Vallekilde.

In the centre hall, is a very famous painting, depicting the lore of Grundtvig. The founder of the Højskolebevægelse in Denmark.

Here you see the mother Mary holding the baby Jesus in his arms. You see them illustrious and benign.

But behind this pair, you see the founder of the olden Gods, the gods of our ancestors. Woden or in Danish. Odin. The war father.

Vallekilde is a bit more primitive than Oxford, I admit that. But the primitivism also has its strengths. One of them a deeper link to our shared past.

What would the olden gods advise us in this situation?

Woden was the god of war and wisdom. His eight legged horse and his spear war seen on many a battle field in the old times.

But unlike Thor, he was not a god of strength, he was a god of wisdom.

This is how we should approach the oncoming fight with the islamists. Not with blind strength, but with wisdom.

We have, in our culture, a lot of strength. We are, seen from outside, according to Joseph Conrad, strong, but not that intelligent.

So, to be honest, we have made many an empire, dating up to five thousand years back. But it was not made on diplomacy, to say the least.

What we have learned however, is to control our rage.

And that is what we should do now. Control our rage, to oppose the enemy we are meeting.

We should not fight all muslims, we should not fight all who are dark skinned. We should fight ISIS.

But that we should do, with all the rage and anger that is inside us. Focus that rage, to win that battle.

Use the rage and the strength that angers gives us, to put aside our worries, and FIGHT.

We need to fight on the beaches, fight in streets, fight in the media, fight where fight is needed. And YOU Boris, you need to lead that fight as a Woden behind the mother Mary.

But you need to have free reins to tackle that fight, as that Churchillian hero you are.

G-d bless the United Kingdom.

We have covered the ideological basis of the fight against ISIS. It has been like that from the beginning, and will continue like that. It is an American lead democratic fight against an inhuman enemy. Something we saw in all simplicity in the attack in Manchester. 

The power brokers of ISIS seems to have had much to free a rein for all too long, it is about time to stop that. This is where we go from phase one to phase two. Phase one was in the Middle East only. We made it a proxy war, and sought to diminish our involvement to the airborne forces primarily. 

This was due to two considerations. First we needed to recuparate after the Bush wars, and secondly we did not have the public support for another war. 

War in Europe is different. We have public support for that, and we have restocked our armory. 

Add to this a R & D focused on infantry gureillawar. We are ready. At least the American side is ready. 

So what should we do now?

We need to keep the focus we had in the first phase. The concentration of power, solely focused on the enemy, and being very careful not to harm any civilians has payed of very well. This has given us the upper hand in the Middle East. 

We need to continue this strategy in Europe. Be VERY precise in our operations. ONLY ISIS combatants or supporters should be targeted, and we have to be 100 % sure, that the enemies we hit are in fact enemies. 

We also need to think a bit about collusion on the municipal level. There are a lot of mayors who are actively working with the enemy. It happens in the UK and it happens in Denmark. So we need to take this into consideration. 

My idea is, that we simply ignore the collusion in the first phase, and concentrate on hitting the ISIS combatants. 

War is black and white. The colluders in the political rank will probably join our side as the war unfolds. 

Finally, we need to realize, that this is the time that the funding of the army has to hit the 2 % mark at least, if not more. 

All NATO members should start chipping in. All. 

Focus, precision, superb intel, and a relentless attitude without fear should get us some results. 

They are actively killing our kids, this is the call for action. Otherwise, what else is?

G-d bless the will to protect our children.