I know, that most of the world does not trust the Iranians. But, I do not understand, reading all the ancient hittitie things and ideas, knowing about Zoroastrianism, knowing about the world and the creed of the flame religion. Why can these people be less trusted than anybody else? Remember, we put them in a situation, where they did not feel we understood and respected them.

That was why Iran rebelled the first time, we now DO understand them, so there is hope and there is peace.

Often people see me as a warmonger, when I point to the fact, that caving in to IS, actually supporting them by giving them rehab is a very bad idea. But then when I do trust the Iranians, because of their history as one of the first civilizations of the world. Then that is wrong also.

Remember, I trusted Al-Sisi, he became an ally and a friend.

I know that Iran plays a double game in a sense. They have to, because there are forces, vile and destructive forces that wishes to destroy Israel. But there is also other forces, that wishes for peace and reconciliation. We have seen them in action for two years.

It is now up to us, to go on on this path, and create that peace.

Here we are all us kings, and we strive and we try, and perhaps, perhaps when we are not anymore, one of us is truly crowned as the true king. I say, that it is up to the Middle East itself to choose the one they want as king. Not the kings themselves.

Now there is peace, get used to it, because it will be a brief respite, before strive is there again. But in this small window, miracles can work and will appear, as the crown religion, that I want his eminence the Bishop of Cantebury, as the caretaker of Oxford to begin.

LET RELIGION LIVE AGAIN; LET G_D LIVE AGAIN. LET US ALL; WE WHO ARE THE HUMBLE SERVANTS OF HIS GRACE HAVE LIFE AGAIN. May people, and life, and all live again. Because, as people strive for this little rock, or that little place in the sun to survive, there is the bigger picture, there is Cyrus, and let us all give this victory to his glory. Let this victory of mankind be handled to him, so that, in his wisdom we may live and survive.

G-d bless you all, and may war end. G-d bless you.

Read more…

I have tried to find a way out of the problems I have with the current Danish PM. He simply refuses to accept the deal, and refuses to enter into dialogue.

There is only one way; we need to get rid of him, and, hopefully, get another PM who are able or willing to support me.

This I will work on for the next foreseeable future, and hope to accomplish.

I know this is a weak basis to build it upon, but, with all the risks it entails, I hereby give a green light for the procedure that should end up with an agreement on nuclear armament of Iran.

I will make sure, that I have the support, maybe not now, but in time.

I will rip the guts of the new PM, and install another one, who will support us.

G-d bless the will of the creator.

We are closing in in the Iran deal, and one thing is for sure; Danish politicians are enemies of the world. Whenever the international philosophical wing of Denmark tries their best to try and make peace, the politicians do whatever they can to ruin this work. By direct intervention as the last PM and now as a direct rejection as the current PM.

Is the fact that they do not understand, do not care or are just too incompetent?

No, they just have the normal arrogance of western leaders. They could not care less! They do not understand, and their horizon is as narrow as their understanding of their own culture. We all have to think and do as they do, or we are seen as “primitives”.

In that sense, I am a primitive, I admit it. Because I have several milleiums of knowledge, because I invented writing, agriculture, politics, the asylum, mathematics, psychology, the wheel.

What did this man do to give him status as number one evil of the world, one thing; as a cave man he is tumbling around in the world. It is called the evil of the narrow minded. We have a saying, that says, that against stupidity the G-ds themselves fight with no chance to win.

This is the worst, evil, wisdom bare, narrow-minded haughtiness.

I truly understand Iran, when they reject this manner. Because it is with no respect for the ancient culture Iran is. But I do also think, that there are people who do understand. As Obama and I, and then there are the Lars Løkke Rasmussen. The narrow-minded and uncompromising man of the West.

Choose Barack, fight Lars Løkke Rasmussen. Put him on sticks, burn him, despise him for his arrogance, and love the humanity we present.

G-d bless the will of spirit, as it will descend and lift our spirit to make peace.

The current conflict I have with the Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen, is a reflection of how a minister should NOT behave. I mean, to have power is an act of selfishness and humility. You serve, you do not command.

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. The levers of power may induce you with the feeling of invincibility and give you a puffed up ego.

Power is the test of your character the old greeks say. If you have a good character, you will be able to confront the sirene song of power, if you have a weak character, you will not be able to resist the corruption of power, and consequently try to steer competitors and power threats to your convenience.

This is the flaws of the weak character. You may also call it arrogance.

This is unfortunately the picture of how the new PM behaves. He is ready to sacrifice his friends, his international career, to hold on to power. He is, after a few days in the saddle, already corrupted.

This is why, he should be shunned by the international community. Corruption at the heart of a government rubs off on the connections he has. Do you want to be seen with a corrupted man? Do you want to be seen with a man defined by arrogance.

No, all wish to be seen with the good man, with nobility rather than debasement.

They say, that if a weak man is at the centre of power, all who are stronger than him, will be in trouble. That is why we need strong and unselfish leaders of our nations. Not weak and selfish leaders, this leads to disaster.

G-d bless the will to be simple and humble.

We are trying to found a new religion, as a kind of salvation as a consequence of the Middle East development. Whether we realize the Iranian deal or not, still the ambition of the Middle East; to realize its potential and win a place in the heart of humanity is still there.

But, we still need to put ourselves the question; if we truly reach this next level of enligthenment, what is then the basis of this? I have picked up a few books, olden, worn books on my bookshelf, ancient books some of them, lost and found by mankind. Some known, some unknown, and I, at least have some idea about the path we might ensue.

Look at it this way; we are sourrounded by sophists, or scientists, who wish to put all material things to scrutiny, and find all answers there. They do not repel moral order, but they will not believe unless they have a proof.

This materialism, is hard to fight, because, what do we have but ideas and beliefs? We have only truths from personal and spiritual experience.

This is why, I believe we have to respect the sophists, and talk their language, but on a higher level in all respects. We simply have to be better, much better. Our lore should be less fragmented, more beautiful, more true. Then we can compete with the sophists.

We have the possibility now, there is an open window, because science is falling. It is plagued by political correctness, political commisionaries, marxist thinkers who reduce rather than expand. All kind of nonsense. While we are still free to expand our knowledge without scrutiny. Because who will care if we search for G-d or find new ethical truths? Noone, because they do not take us serious anymore. This is truly our chance to forge new answers, with more quality less hearsay and more truth than the plagued sciences.

Let me give you an example. According to normal lore, there is no life after death. It is just a psychological journey, through pain and misery, and ends up as a material death, where our cells and atoms just dissapear. Who can live with this nonsense? Who will accept, in the long run, that there is no deeper meaning. Noone, all thirsten for a deeper meaning and sense. And if we give them that, in a row of ideas of quality, make it possible to truly believe again, we can compete, we can regain ground, matter again, be a part of normal life again.

It all comes down to answers of a high quality.

This ends and starts with one thing; cosmology. The sophists define our cosmos. They define life as a Darwinian/big bang theory that we have to make a better answer to. This is where Oxford comes into play. Because I truly believe, that the cosmology that I present, as a true Anaxagorean system, will compete and even better the ideas of Hawkins.

It will then be a competition between Oxford and Cambridge, on who has the better answer. The only thing is; my answer, anwers the question of who G-d is, and what he is. In this way, G-d willing, and with the help of his eminence archbishop Welby. We can turn the tide. It is radical, and only through the influence of Welby and perhaps mr. Cameron through Brasenose, are we able to compete. This is the life and death question of both Anglican Christianity, but also religion in general. Through the crisis of Anglicanism, and the desperate measures we have to take, we can turn the tide, all of us.

It does not end there, there are more layers than Anaxagoras, there is Heraclitus and Demokrit to add to the theory. If only Oxford is willing to talk true metaphysics again. Is able and daring enough.

G-d willing, and Welby willing, we will, all of us, prevail.

G-d bless the will of his eminence and force of our holy and blessed father.

The Iran deal is nearing its final moments. I have been an adamant supporter of this deal. It all started after I, with mr. Barack Obama pulled the teeth of mr. Ahmadinejad. I suppose the single greatest victory of the first tenure of Obama.

Now we are here, it is all set and done. Mr. Netanyahu has been against the deal from the very outset, because he believes that the Persians will remodify the deal after the deal has been done, and the pressure is lifted.

Well, the original pressure, is still here, Barack and I are here, we can push, and we do push.

But what after Obama is not president anymore? Things change, and can we still believe in the deal.

Well, if I get the necessary support from my own government, it is viable.

This has been a proposal I have put to the new government, and the PM mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen. But, until now, he has not been open for negation. Heaven know it is a small and minimal proposal. I have demanded around one million dollars to make a film and support some bloggers.

I cannot sustain a deal of this magnitude by working as a helper as I do now. I have no problems working as a helper, but it is simply too irresponsible, especially towards Israel to support a deal, if it only is founded by my own self. I need the Danish government to chip.

So far, without result. Løkke Rasmussen is very new to the game, and I seriously hope, that it is all about trying to find his way, and wrangling with his new role. But I also suspect an element of arrogance and defiance. It is all about power. He wants to be the one in control, and in this I am a problem.

I still support the deal, but I need Danish official recognition of my role in it, to maintain it after Obama is gone.

I am sorry, but this is the it has to be.

You could perhaps all help by ignoring Løkke Rasmussen until he has entered the negotiations himself, or by one of his ministers. It would be a great help. Apart from that, I will put internal pressure on his government, to make him change his mind.

G-d bless you all, and think about the fact, that this is not a deal made on earth, but belongs to the realm of heavens, as it is both good and beautiful.

We are nearing a conclusion in the ongoing negotiations between Russia, the US, Iran and, in the periphery Israel.

People say, that Obama was not strong in foreign policy, but if this deal is landed, he will, or rather there is a very good chance, he will be lauded as the most succesful American president in foreign matters.

I have a good American friend, in fact a very wise american friend, who shares my love for Søren Kierkegaard. He tries to find that middle road between Islamic extremism at one hand, and racism at the other hand. Not to fight IS because you are a racist, makes no sense, not to fight the torching of black churches makes no sense either. I believe he is right, you have to find that middle ground. Kierkegaard believes that you come from seduction, that is your immoral and often unrealized needs, to ethics, but can reach spirit by forgiving.

I believe when it comes to the conflicts we are trying to solve in the world today, that we need to reach that middle point; and that is ethics. We need to be ethical and sharp on our own values and ideas to navigate in the world.

Everybody agrees, that mr. Barack Obama tries his best to be a good man, and in this lies the salvation and the moral compass of international politics. Its is very difficult, but met by a moral order, it seems to me, that the Middle East finally will find some kind of peace. Hopefully.

It is quite obvious, that the sunni muslim fighters of IS are immoral. Killing civilians on a beach? Come on, and then quoting G-d for this inhuman act.

Finding the moral high ground in this conflict is not difficult.

We are now nearing the end of the negotiations of the hittitie empire. Once there were asylums, remember Persia? When you developed some of the very basis of mankinds lore. As hittitie cities were asylum for those who were in need.

This is a good deed, and as a consequence, more good deeds will come of that fertile ground that is Persia. Not to mention Assad, who are trying to protect all creeds in his country.

I reach out for peace, and may we, by the will of the supreme being, reach that state of equilibrium, just for a day or two. But we will be able to say; we were there, we were the men behind that little window of peace. War will come again, but we will have peace as long as I am here, and Barack is there.

G-d bless the peace we may find.

It is said, that in the olden times, our forefathers migrated from Denmark or somewhere around, and came to Greece. According to the great Danish historian Wilhelm Grønbech, they put up shop on a rock on the Peloponnes.

After some time, through the time of Homer, the Myceneans became Athenians, and great visionaries as Socrates and Plato were sparks that flew out of that fertile mould.

Up here in the North, we can still see the resemblances with us and the Greek.

Time has come, it has softened some edges, but that vicious spark of freedom is still there in the soul of the Greek. It is still there thousands and thousands years after Homer. They call it Sparta, but the truth is, that the Dorians (Danes) were fighters of G-d. Heed to that creed, to that spirit, and you may free yourselves.

All this banking thing, forget about it, it is about slavery from the European Union, they are trying to enslave you in the name of Mammon.

Free yourselves, as your ancestors did. Free yourselves from that slavery siphoned from invisible chains. Vote NO!

As you are the heirs to one of the greatest civilizations on earth, and you are right to insist on doing things your own way, in your own country. The Germans do not understand, that they are of the same blood as you. But they will understand, after you have gained your freedom from the yoke of banking tyranny.

It is not about the debt, it is about creating a superstate of hitherto unknown proportion. Banking is just a tool to make that Union. They will stop at nothing, and you should remember who you are, as descendants of those great viking warriors that first inhabited that barren rock, that is now known as Akropolis.

It is a symbol, deep down, on the first virtue of our forefathers; freedom.

G-d bless the freedom Greece may have as a descendant and fighter for the value of the vikings; a free man in his own right.

After the horrendous attack, or rather strings of attacks against western and pro democratic targets in the Middle East, we are at the discussion; who were the attackers?

Well, you should ask themselves, and you will find the answer; they are sunni muslims who are fighting for an old school islamic state. That is a kingdom based on the writings and doings of the prophet Muhammad.

This is a state system in direct opposition to democracy. As in the fight between Communism and Democracy, we now have another political fight between Islamism (political Islam) and Democracy.

In more detail. The islamic state is based on sharia, that is holy law deduced from the Koran and the Hadiths. In opposition to this democracy is, ideally, based on the will of the people. This is the base of the American Constitution and the Magna Carta.

Now, it is a bit of an artificial division. There are greyzones, where some muslims believe in part of the political part of Islam and not all. But there are states that are democratic and Muslim, like Egypt and Tunisia. In Libya, we fought for democracy, but remember, this is also a Muslim country.

So, that is how it is, ask an honest Muslim, and he will agree.

We need to stick to that, for several reasons. First of all, because this is how it is. Secondly, by showing the Muslim world, that we actually do understand the ins and outs of Islam, we present ourselves as a serious player in the international game. This was one of the reasons, that it was, and is a mistake to support the Muslim Brotherhood. When and if we do this, they will see us as unknowing and manipulative in the game of the Middle East.

Thirdly, it gives the part of the Muslim world, that are willing to make alliances and support us, a way. Like in Egypt, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia but also Syria and Iran.

Fourthly; religious wars are the worst. When we fight for our freedom, we fight for something positive and emancipating. Fighting for G-d, or as we believe G-d tells us often lead to fanaticism and fascism. Remember facism is not just a rule of Italy under Moussolini, it is the idea that you are absolutely right.

When we fight for our freedom, we know that we are not always right, and consequently have the humility to allow other creeds and political understanding a place in our society. As Jews, as gays, as other minorities. It creates freedom, tolerance and peace.

So, no I do not believe all Muslims are evil, I believe we fight a political strand of Sunni Islam, that has the arrogance to believe that they know what G-d wants us to do. They do not, because G-d always changes his mind. He is for love and solidarity, not for murder and rape. This is not G-d, this is man.

G-d bless all who believe in peace and freedom.

It seems to me, that after the election the Conservatives have gone back to bickering. The promises mr. Cameron gave under the election is fought over, bit by bit.

Serioulsy? Come on, Great Britain has one of the best chances of getting a lead in all matters conservative; church, crown and security.

First of all, his excellency Welby needs a kickstart in his mission to remake the Anglican church. Find every ressource, every able man to support him. He is the right man, he is on fire and he is radical. We need to support and stem him up, give him ressources, show him affection, and just, basically help him.

Then there is Great Britain itself, that is the United Kingdom. This is of primary concern to her majesty. She is very worried that everything falls into pieces, she need to see movement in this matter. She needs to see, that the United Kingdom is once again on the path of unity.

This can be done be reaching out, but also on answering the call for independence with serious action. Scotsmen wants indepence of a sort, give it to them. This will hold the United Kingdom together. I will work on a Northern Union with Scandinavia and UK, perhaps also with the US, if the US wants. In the distant future also Russia.

But, this drive, of both independence and also a new union should and could support the claim of both Scotland, that wants closer to Scandinavia, and England that wants to boost its claim on international leadership. This is the project that can be done! We in Denmark are all ready now, and we can pull the rest of Scandinavia on to your side. Imagine the power we could have, a power that could be used to realign and solidify our states that are all reeling after the acts of the European Union. Come on, this is ROCK!!!

Then there is security matters. We have a huge influx of IS fighters to the UK, stop them, send them away. But apart from that, solidify the British workers right to a job, he needs it, and the state needs it.

G-d bless you, and COME ON, start on your Cameron tour, Oxford needs it, UK needs it, you need to put your foot down and make your mark. Now is the time!

I am back, I am sorry about the break, but, as you may know, there has been an intense and interesting election in Denmark, where a centre/right government finally took power.

I really supported that part, because I believe, that the chaos that is to begin in Europe needs a firm and effective government, not a chaotic and ineffective as we had.

It was a good a fight, and we did not win by a large margin, so we took and gave. Elections are often violent (not physical but emotional) and devasting. Winners take it all, losers loose it all. As the former PM Thorning had to realize. She used my own little daughter against me, so I took her out. This is good in the sense, that at least danish politics is not such a nuisance to the international community as it has been.

The election is very good news for mr. Cameron, and the US. Since the pro Anglican part of the Danish political system won. We will see a lot of negotiations and closer relationship between the UK and Denmark. Perhaps even to the extent that Vallekilde and Oxford can share ideas and debate again. I really hope os, I love Oxford.

But, we should focus on the Middle East process and the prophesy of Rav Ashlag, at least this is what I will do.

I will try and bring peace, and mend the wound for those who are in harms way. We can do it, and bring love to the bright and beautiful land of the Levant.

G-d bless you all.

I hope things are professing well in the UK. Since I have left the election, I have been quite busy with the Danish election, that fortunately ends in a week. Two elections in a row, that gets to you. I will look very much forward to the redemption work we have to conduct in the Middle East, and the peace process we should envision and pursue. All of us.

I hear, that the wise leader of the Anglican church have met with the leader of Al-Azhar. A grand opening and a good prelude. That calls for applause!

Then there is one thing, that I would like to give as an opportunity to mr. Cameron, the now happy PM of Great Britain! What a feat David, we did it. We did for Oxford. It will pay dividends down the line, if we just keep up the pace, and save what we find and hold dear.

There is a very interesting thing happening in the election process here in Denmark. They call it a great win for you David, but, as, I see it, it is a shared victory. The Danish conservatives are moving towards a solution as Great Britain is currently negotiating with the EU. We will, if everything goes right, be joining hands soon.

You could, if you wished to influence the debate, send some smoke rings and artful symbolic gestures towards Denmark, that you, hopefully support our outstretched hand. There is a certain respect and honor given to anyone who are of stature here in Denmark, if you send some signals. Not too obvious off cause. But something the newspapers could argue about and work on. Thank you.

All in all, in a week I am back, hopefully with good news.

G-d bless you all, and may we have peace.

I hear, that the bombs are falling from Gaza again. Let me be absolutely clear; it will not help the Gazans or the West bank in their struggle for freedom or any kind of positive relation to me or the West. It is unacceptable.

I think I made it clear last time, that what you win, you win it by being ethical in your means. Bombing indiscriminately is not ethical, it is unethical, and will not be tolerated.

I made it clear last time, and I do it again. Do not start any warmongering, you risk endagering the entire peaceproces, and that will not be popular.

G-d bless the peace we will find.

I have had a long time coming, focusing on the Middle East, and trying to make peace there. Not the easiest task in the world. But possible.

Right now, there is election time in Denmark, and it is very close. I have to focus on it in the next three or four weeks, on my danish blog.

But after that, I will concentrate in international matters again.

And yes, I, off cause will support any democratic candidate there is. Unless of cause it is someone with an inter national agenda that is not peaceful. In America, that is more conservative than Denmark, I align more with the Democrats than the Conservatives when it comes to Welthfarestate, religion, community work and business. But, after all, I really love and respect mr. Obama. So, I think it will be a hard thing to work without him. But all good things must come to an end.

Anyway, I hope you understand my work here in Denmark for the time being, I will be able to focus more fully on international matters in a forthnight.

G-d bless you all, and may we find peace.

We need to work, in practice with the new all compassing theological framework behind the unification of the three monotheistic religions. In this work, I propose a simple act; go back to the beginning of Islam, Christianity and Judaism. Here you find a noble citizen of Ur and Babylon; Abraham. 

According to my sources within Kabbalism, that has the maximum knowledge of the genesis of the three religions, Abraham was a metaphysician. Today we know him primarily as an ethical figure, and the person that made the covenant. But there is more behind this first veil. If you google Abraham and checks out his metaphysical stance, you realize, that he was a deep thinker, and there was a cosmology behind the first ideas of monotheism. 

So as Abraham, we need to find a metaphysical and cosmological understanding that is as advanced as possible. With this, we can also compete with physics, that currently hold the torch in relation to understanding of the reality we are in. We need to tackle Hawkins, Niels Borh and Einstein. With respect of cause. 

This is why I have tried to realize the epitome of metaphysics, that is the Anaxagorean cosmology. He is the best we have, and he is, currently, the most advanced state of metaphysics man has reached. After that, it did not evolve much. 

I have tried to convince Oxford to help me in this regard, and they will, hopefully, but we need to expand this first step and evolve in all three religions. Abraham was the first, we need to expand this understanding. 

G-d bless the will of G-d. 

They call me a warmonger, they call me a thief, they call me a spook and a liar. But there is one thing that is clear, deep down under all those layers of insecurity, of ”getting out of the hood”, of trying to reach those aims noone else claim or even dream about, there is a good heart. A good, sincere, honest heart, that is all mine. It is not from my parents, they were both idiosyncratic or politcal correct. It is not from my upbringing, that was 99% pain, and one percent good reads. It is my heart, deep under all the sorrow and the loss and the sacrifice, I have that, which, at the end, qualifies me to bring the world onto a better place, just a sound, well meaning heart, that will try its very best to propel our destiny to a brighter and more positive place.

You know, in a world that is falling apart, you have to be able to step aside, and truly look at the world from a more neutral perspective.

I know, that my dreams of a better world is hanging in a thin thread, that got a lot thicker with mr. Camerons win in the UK, but still the thread can be cut anytime.

But, whilst we look into the darkness of our future, and search for that little piece of luck or that smallish way out, we should always remember, that deep down in the fine layers of our soul that borders the almighty, there is a thread of good in all of us.

That is what brings hope. In each and every man or woman, child and elderly. In the flowers and the butterfly, there is good.

This is why we are here, to realize that token of hope.

We can do that, if we try, and the almighty always gave both signs and methods for us to reach him. So we should not despair or give up, because he is there, and he will guide us onto our path. It is written in the stars they say, and I believe, with all of my pained heart, that he wrote a little path for you, for me, for your sister and brother, for the disabled and the rich, for the fallen and for the upright. He wrote a little script we could read. Therefor, there is hope for all of us. I also believe, that miracles are not just a theory, it will happen, if we believe. If we believe with all of that part of our hearts that is close to G-d, and is good.

Go down on our tired knees, and pray. Because, someone will answer, if we just have enough faith.

G-d bless all those lonely wanderers, who are in need of a guide, not a mortal guide, but a guide, made out of spirit.

The Middle East with all its domes and centers of religion is in turmoil, it always has been in turmoil. But with Israel thrown in the mix, the turmoil has, on one hand increased, and on the other other hand decreased.

Israel is truly a vehicle for peace, but at the other hand it also, by being not neutral a motor of conflict.

I realize, that my stance; the neutral stance, is not really working these days. I wish it was otherwise. But at the other hand, it still is a potential bridge to overcome the differences.

I am the Messiah in a Middle East context, that is a prophesiezed hero to turn the different ideas into one.

This is not something I have wished for, but something that is in the cards. You can fight me, but you will always lose, because in a religious heartland, people will always, in the end, go with G-d.

G-d bless you all, and may you all see what G-d really wants, not just your own motives and self-interest, but G-ds interest, that is love.

There are a lot of things going on in the UK right now, especially the clamp down on islamists and other radical Muslims is under way. I wholeheartedly support it, we need to be realistic about the destructive potential of these ideas, and in order to keep at sound and healthy society, we need to be sharp on our democratic values and system.

We cannot tolerate IS to work out of Europe and be supported and protected by democratic rights they obviously do not like. It is like feeding the crocodile with its own tail. The more we support them, the more we are eaten up.

But, I also do believe, that we should have a positive aim. If we are too sucked up by all the glorious singing that leads to rape and mass murder, we end up as them. We should, by all means, stay on our own values in this regard. We do not fight jihadis jihadi style, we do it to keep our freedom, and we do it on our own premises and with our own methods.

Denmark

These days there is a lot of discussion in Denmark concerning a meeting on the beautiful island of Bornholm. Some parts of the islamic critical political environment wants to make the meeting about the discussion of Islam in the Danish society, while the idea was to make a cosy political festival where you could relax and talk to people of all colour. This has brought a lot of finger pointing and conflict.

This is a sharp contrast to the reaction we had a few months ago, when some of my friends were attacked. We are heroes, they are still just not accepted.

This is because, from time to time there has been a racist agenda and a very negative agenda from these other islamcritics. It just does not work, we need to be clear on our methods and aims to cut this cake. There should be no racial motives or things like that. But a true and purposeful defence of our beloved democracy.

G-d bless the will to be sincere and honest in the face of corruption.

To rearm G-d with systems and methods to grow and realize his providence here on earth, we need knowledge. The more we know about G-d, the better we are at realizing his work.

This calls on repentance and humility, we cannot take or steal from other, but we can give and support those who needs us.

In the Middle East we have, according to T.E. Lawrence the fighters of the desert. The blinding heat and the searing, blistering sun has given hardness and clarity to those who wander out of the desert. This ethical clarity calls for poetry. The waning of the sun over the desert mountains, the shimmering of spirit over the heat of the dust. This calls for strength in wisdom and power in serving G-d.

In the Christian or Roman world we have worked, for a long time on Platonic philosophy, then on Aristotelian philosophy.

My aim has been to surpass this and head back to Animaxander, the teacher of Plato, because, for one thing it is on a higher level than Plato, with all respect. But there is another thing, that might interest the Sunni Arabs, it is poetic in its very nature. It is a system built to realign the heavenly order with the material order.

Unfortunately, I have not been able to get the paper passed the peer review yet, but perhaps this was a line of thought that could elevate the Saudies.

If Saudiarabia wants to compete with the rest of the world, it needs a system that will boost its philosophical level. This would definitely boost is, and it would be poetic.

If you wish to boost this understanding, you need to invite me over to give you the basics, but from there on, you can use it to elevate your understanding of G-d and what he might want us to do here on earth.

G-d bless the peace we will find, by being one with G-d.

The Middle East is a source of conflict, because it has always been like that. Be it Christian, Assyrian, Coptic, Sunni, Shia, Zoroastrian, Jewish or any other of the hundreds of ideologies filling the Middle East .

I do not decide who will do what, I can only advice. But the advice should be based on ideas from the Middle East to work there. That is simple.

In terms of peace ideas, these are ideas that are in the Middle East understanding, because people see what war brings of misfortune.

Many local powers have shed the dependence on the West and are trying to work on their own. This is good, because most of the West has no idea about how the Middle East thinks and works. We just are elephants in the boutique of glass. Destroying things as we meddle.

But, at the other hand, if, by some chance, there are people in the West who actually do understand, as it rarely happens, the marriage of Western and Eastern philosophy can bring prosperity. As it is truly doing in Saudiarabia and Egypt these days. And as it will do, if all hands come down in the table in Persia.

Look at Egypt, how she prospers by using her ancient ideas in connecting with a European style constitution. It works.

So, ancient beautiful ideas all of a sudden are revitalized, kept in secret books for thousands and thousands of years, to reemerge! In modern times.

May you all prosper and be rich and honorable again.

G-d bless you all.

If we take a step back, and look at the ideological content of the UK election, it seems to me, that things are running together, and if we are lucky, we might just experience a certain synergy between the different parts of the Anglican society.

First of all, what really came through, and basically was the crux of the matter was the economy. There has been a lot of talk about austerity, and how the money saved by austerity helped the economy. Well, it does not work that way. The way it works is by building up production capability. This is how a country makes money.

China has done it by copying our production methods, philosophy, systems and so on. It has made them rich. It is like an architect and a carpenter building a house. The better you are a building the house, the better it becomes. If you are very good a building that house, you can sell it, and other houses, and you get rich.

So, we are very good at building things here in the West, all it really took, was a motivation for our production men and women to make things here in the West, or rather in the UK. You do that by respecting and honoring those who build. If you, like in many socialist theories, hate and ridicule the people who build things, they will find somewhere else to build things. But if you truly respect what they do, and shower them with praise and honor. They will build where you are, it is also called patriotism.

Now, patriotism goes hand in hand with another part of society that needs a bit of help. The church.

Here again, we have a huge backlash of demotivation and lack of self-esteem. The socialist ethos has all but wiped out the church of England. So we need to turn that around 180 degrees. How do we do that? We do it by kindling the faith. By actually giving the church something to believe in, to rectify metaphysics.

This process has been going on for a while in the personation of his excellency archbishop Welby, who is a former businessman, and a radical. So you see, the production people, who were scared and saddened by the lack of honor they got from the state and people, and the church actually do have something in common; the need support to make the society grow and prosper.

This realization has been long under way, but it truly materialized in this election.

There are a lot of things we need to do in the coming five years, but let us not abuse the position we have, let us be positive and benevolent. Let us not just use it to destroy what the socialists have left, but use it to build things. Make new houses, create a better UK, not only with money. But also with new ideas and creative work.

Patriotism has a bad name. But to me it does not make much sense. I mean, patriotism or the belief in a national state is as old as man. It comes from the fertile crescent, we have cities like Eden, Ur and Babylon there. In the classic greek time we had Athens, Sparta, and in modern time the theory that was invented at the same place that gave us agriculture and writing, has been expanded to include greater areas.

How can writing be a source of conflict, so to say, it does not. Man is a source of conflict, because there is a shadow within as Jung calls it. And it is if we do not realize this, and search for peace, we will have war. The clothing is not important, the intent is.

G-d bless the United Kingdom, and may it survive and prosper.

I come from this place of beauty. My great grandfather Ernst Trier founded what was to become the Oxford of Denmark. The great and beautiful Højskole of Vallekilde.

Vallekilde lies at the brink of the sea, and when you look out of the windows at the top of the school, you can see miles and miles on.

In the main hall, there are frescoes of Thor and Odin, hunting the orm of Midgaard. This place is so filled with memories and magic you would sometimes think it in a Harry Potter film. It is not the same, but yet in a profoundly Danish way, it is.

Each generation of Triers, especially those who are leading in their time, are supposed to expand the school. This has been my dream. It never really happened, I tried and failed.

That is why I knew, when I was called to Oxford, that I could not fail that school too.

At the surface, you could say, that I was just a passersby, not really invited, not truly a part of Oxford. But when I came to Oxford, it all really spoke to me. Not like Vallekilde, because Vallekilde is in my veins, literally. But because I could see a great and proud school vaning and I could see that it needed repair. Not in the structural sense, but in a deeper sense. Its soul needed repair.

This has been my work ever since I came home from Oxford, to try and repair the soul.

English people know, that there is such a thing as magic. Not as you might expect as a superficial thing. But a much deeper thing. Something about miracles and light.

We, Oxford and I, just delivered such a miracle. Isn’t it crazy? We came from nothing, and left everybody reeling. I hope, that Oxford, in the deeper sense, will rise again. And not like Vallekilde be snatched away from me. Once again.

Schools are living things, especially if they are as old as Oxford and my own Vallekilde. We need to tend their souls to really make them blossom.

Let us all do that in the coming years. Tend the souls of those great living, magical entities, so that they may deliver us.

G-d bless Oxford and its valiant knights, standing there in the morning sun, to fight another day, for her honour.

Well, as AC DC said, it was Rock or Bust. Given the the result, I suppose it is ROCK!

Well done everybody, you stood up for your queen and country, you refused to give up, spitting defeat in the face. Well done.

One might put a few words on analysis, why was it done? First of all; good deeds lead to luck. By focusing on the positive things, luck was in the side of the Tories. That is a lesson that should be carved into the first stone page of every campaigners book from here on. I got it from an ancient Anglo-Saxon poem in fact. Good deeds lead to luck.

Then at the other hand, there were some mudslinging as well, at least so it seems. But if you really focus on the actual meat of the messages, it was truly positive; using the foundation laid by the austerity, to build up the country again.

Then there is the unfortunate situation of UKIP. I would not be so sorry about it really, but look forward at the EU election as what really matters. UKIP set the agenda, and has moved the entire political system their way, that is why they lost. The other parties have taken their ideas. What is most important; to have the honor, or to truly make a difference? I would vote, being the most successful campaigner on earth, and receiving absolutely nothing for it, except for ridicule and persecution, for the service to matter. It is not about yourself, it is about the service you do. You may die on the way, but as long as the country wins, you should be ready to commit that sacrifice.

Then there is the Labour. Utter and total destruction, why? Basically because of a lack of new ideas. The chest of new an inspiring things to do is empty. It strikes me, that Neil Kinnock, the husband of our current Danish PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt had all the opportunity to win me over here in Denmark. After all, I have supported, unflinchingly mr. Barack Obama, but I suppose the other way, that of persecution, made more sense to him. You chose, you had the effect.

So what are really the things we face. First of all, I believe we face a situation where UKIP has a great claim in changing the system. It is not fair to them, and something should be done to rectify that way. One way is to follow systems in Denmark, Schwitzerland or Israel. That is a representative percentage of electioneers reflecting the actual vote. This will however have the obvious drawback, that local candidates will not feel as motivated to fight for their constituency, but at the other hand bringing change of national spirit harder to materialize. I suppose it is a discussion worth, I will chip in on it to draw some parallels to other classical constitutions as the Athenian and Spartan, and others of interest, if needed.

Finally, who won really? Was it mr. Cameron? No he brought the actual win through, but he is a representative of something, the tip of the iceberg so to say. The best man of his backers.

No, it was something else, in a powerleague that outshines mr. Cameron completely, with all respect, it was the Shire that won. It was Oxfordshire, that dream or fatamorgana of ancient power that stood up, awaken from its slumber and started fighting with a power so immense, that we will still see what will come of it.

It is not a posh university, it is not a dying thing. It is a conservative humanistic dog of war, and it has entered the fray, beware all enemies of England, because England has awoken and it is fighting. With its back against the wall, but in this position it is at its very best.

G-d bless all, winners and losers, and may G-d heal your wounds and dampen the spirit of those who do this of their own winning, and spur those who do it to serve.

There is one thing most Brits agree upon, being Scotsmen, English, Welsh og Irish. They do not like the EU. It is seen, and that is right, as a continental mess trapping smallish states into a web of bureaucracy and mismanagement.

EU seems to go well with most of the southern European hemisphere, but up here in the North in the “Anglo-Saxon” world, I suppose that is Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Great Britain and Holland, plus a part of Belgium, and a part of France, we do not like the centralist quasi old fashioned Roman way of doing things. We feel like another reformation, because of the creeping corruption coming from the south. This is, in many ways, wrong, but old habits die hard, and that is as it has always been seen, in the last two thousand years.

Anyway, the UK is breaking apart, due to the pressure the EU is putting on nation states. Nation states need more than just football and the fading anthem to hold it together, it needs real vested power. Not just superficial things. As a consequence, the UK is falling apart.

Now, the obvious medication would be to rip out the heart of Europe and feed it to the lions. We are doing that, and I will personally make sure this happens, as it is ripping into Denmark, and searing all the vital cords between the Danish political class and the people.

But what comes after? As I see it, and perhaps this could be a way, we could make a northern union based on our own values like democracy and equality.

This would potentially settle the fuss in the UK, making us all stronger. I know that the coming PM of Denmark mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen would potentially look favorably on the idea, and this may just on one hand give us all a viable democratic construction, and at the other hand strengthen some of the wishes of the Scots. It is a good idea, and it could be developed further.

At least, we have this opportunity, and perhaps this could truly be that crowbar that would prie open the door for at renewed loyalty to the king and the queens of the beautiful isles of the hebriedes and beyond.

G-d bless the future, and may it look bright.

I have two good friends who are both very different, but still, basically try to fight the same fight. The fight for truth.

One of them you all know as the “radical lady” who got someone shot because of a picture of Mohammad in Texas, blessed be him.

But the other one, you probably do not know. He is an unknown writer, even unknown in Denmark.

His name is Ibi-Pipi, but that is only a recent addition to his signature. In fact he was, until recently, called such a mundane thing as Per Erik.

It however changed when he realized that he was a woman. Or, well not really a woman, he feels like a female lesbian, trapped in a male body, … or something. Anyway, because of the sad predicament, he resolutely changed his gender. A new and very politically correct rule has made it possible for said misnomers, who feel abundantly trapped in someone else’s body, to emancipate themselves and change their gender; officially. Truly, officially, on drivers license, in the bank, and most precarious of all, in the swimming pool……

Being a man, or perhaps a woman, of his words, he therefor, as any persecuted minority, crusaded to the local swimming pool. In the most posh and presumptious city called Viborg. A smallish place with great ambition in the field of appearance.

Mustering all his courage, he ventured into the changing room, and started pulling off his clothes, reaching for a fine bathing suit of womanish proportions.

This however turned into a hoolabalooh of fuss, since, at the time of the day he so chose his endeavor, mostly elderly women used the facility. They, obviously, did not understand the inner conflicts of poor Ibi-Pipi, formerly known as Per Erik.

But, to the rescue, came a political correct headmistress of the swimming pool, and saved the day by, at one hand, respecting the feelings of Ibi-pipi, but at the other hand saving the grace of the sensible eyes of the elderly women, by ushering Ibi-pipi into a room usually used when disabled persons had to change in the swimming pool.

But, o woe, o misery. This really hurt Ibi-Pipi, because there he was, in a room usually used for handicapped people. And he felt a bit disabled by the prerogative. This, while he tried to emancipate his inner lesbian!

But, he will have to carry on, finding his inner lady, lesbian, female. Oh whatever! Because, the keen observer will see, that the king did not have in clothes on, islamophobia is a lie, and perhaps Ibi-Pipi IS trying to get a message across to us, we all sitting here in our plush armchairs, having all the right opinions, because, just perhaps, have we gone a little too far in protecting all kinds of minorities, without being reflective on it.

Do not get me wrong, I really like gays. In fact, I love when they do all their glitter and party thing. But, maybe we should look on ourselves from time to time, and be humble.

G-d bless the light of the artists.

I think we have finally found a way to truly turn the tide of the West. The dangers, the fall, the colossal tide of misfortune, that has swept over us after the fall of the British empire, has finally come to a halt, and a new generation of humanistic conservatives will perhaps make a vanguard of repair and redeem the people of North.

The expansion of the Vikings is not new, it started with the sea peoples that came to be Jews and Spartans, and continued with the Rus, the British empire and now with a renewed focus on the virtues of our people.

We are what we are, simple but brave, inexhaustible and sturdy, and yet true to our friends and family. We prefer freedom and stability, the fact that man can roam the oceans and the prairie is what we like.

If we manage to turn this tide, and so it seems, we will have a brief respite until the next monumental fight and strife. Because this is what we are; fighters first and foremost. We prefer to fight, to use our strong hands and minds to make freedom where we are.

This attitude has found many reflections and manifestations. Many local colorings according to the natural habitat. As in russia, where there are no borders and a very cold night. Spurring the warmth of heart and strength in abundance. As in Australia where the vision has grown into at one hand a liberal society, and at the other hand a conservative shell that protects all. Many ways, many local reflections. But we have to remember, that deep down, behind all the veils and turns of events, lie a fighter. This is truly what we are. Fighters, and we will always remain so. Be it Jew, gentile, Australian, American, English, Scottish, Welsh, or any other descendant of those hardened warriors in their sturdy and lethal boats, roaming the sea.

G-d bless our freedom, may we never lose it.

To really save something, you truly need to understand it. I remember reading in mr. Boris Johnsons book about Mr. Churchill, that in the eve of the battle between the “narzies” and England, Churchill stood up, and made Great Britain stand up by using the old words, the Anglo Saxon words.

I have pondered a bit about that, and it strikes me, that there are somehow two layers in the English language; the Latin and the Anglo Saxon. The Latin is often civilised, intelligent, superior in use and spirit. While as the Anglo Saxon words are simple but strong.

This dichotomy goes through art and society in many ways. As you can see in the difference between Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. Tolkien being the old school shire man and Anglo Saxon, C.S. Lewis being the radical Christian and thus more refined in a way.

In times of need and understanding, one needs to understand both perspectives to really understand what Great Britain is. But in times where the country is in need of strength, one seems to draw on the Anglo Saxon roots, the Danish roots, the raw power that lies in the core of our shared culture.

So you need to understand what our view of the world is, and what this gives as incentive to the people.

Danes are simple but strong. We are focused, not just focused but die hard aiming at a single point in the horizon. This on one hand makes us live too much in the future. Because we seem to focus on what will come, but at the other hand makes us extremely persistent. Take the example of Frodo. He went through hell, sacrificed his life, his future for the world. But look a little deeper and you will see why he really sacrificed himself; he did it for the shire.

This is the deepest understanding of what it is to be Anglo Saxon. You sacrifice yourself for you local community. In Denmark we have an old word called “frænder”. It is the same as the English word “friends”. It is, in Danish, more than just a superficial understanding of some connection to someone. It carries the understanding of a sacrificing relationship. Where you sacrifice yourself for your loved ones, for your friends, for the shire.

This is truly what it is to be Danish. To have a simple but strong community, to have friends, and then go to hell and beyond to save them and help them. As Sam did to Frodo.

Deep down, this is our true strength, and it is reflected in towering persons as Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and mr. Winston Churchill. Take of all the layers of philosophy and thought, and deep down you see that shireman, just fighting to keep the shire save.

Do that, and you truly touch upon something vital and very, very important.

Come on David be yourself, fight for Oxfordshire, you can do it, do not lose steam, we believe in you, so COME ON!

G-d bless the fair isles of all of Great Britain.

The election is not really moving in the British final phase. The problem is pretty obvious; it is about the content of the political ideas of both parties.

In England, the message has been wheeled around the economy, taking in the 2013 election in the US as an ideal. Here it was truly mostly about the economy and less about immigration, the fight against IS and so on.

The reality in Europe is however quite different. Here immigration is linked to the question about the IS fight. Because the immigrants are the IS. A huge swath of the immigrants that come from mostly muslim countries swear allegiance to IS, and as a consequence the two issues are interlinked.

To break the gridlock, the conservatives must do inroads into this uncharted territory.

In Denmark it is pretty much the same, but we have had the discussion in the political system for a long time, making the discussions very detailed.

One first thing is to try and get a humanistic view on the problems. What we should definitely not do, is to go all gung ho racist on the issue, in fact, we should do the opposite. Look at the obvious racist problems there are within immigrant communities, as the antisemitic persecution obvious in France and Denmark. As the genderproblems, as the persecution of Christian minorities in Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt and other Middle East countries.

That is, the obvious problem with many immigrants is the fact that they are not humanistic, but on the contrary totally maniacal racist.

This view on the issues will ensure a viable and sustainable criticism of the policies that are at place. In fact, until the election started, great inroads were done to the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK, and many of the other problems.

If the Conservatives wish to win, you or we, have to come to terms with these issues and get a humanistic grip on them. Otherwise we will be hardpressed.

G-d bless the fair isles of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Well, after a long, or in fact, to be absoluty honest, rather longish, or perhaps, well you could call it short, discussion with one of my friends concerning an art exhibition we are doing together, I have decided to make a bold strike, and start as a painter. In the noble tradition Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and other renaissance painters. Ok, theoretically I might be on their level, but in matters of skill, I am far, far below, I admit!

But, you have to start somewhere, and perhaps this is a bit of inspiration to someone who likes renaissance art.

My first project is about finding beauty in nature. According to the Italian mathematician Fibonacci, there is a mathematical equation, that is found again and again in nature. It is a clever geometrical form, where you add the two last numbers in a row of numbers together. It creates a building block that grows exponentially. You find it all around nature, in your face, where it constitutes a number of measures, in waves in the ocean, in galaxies. Above, you can see it represented in a Nautilus shell. This is beauty as G-d wanted it. Because why is this pattern everywhere, had it not been for an intelligent design?

You call it the fingerprint of G-d.

If you wish to acquire said painting, albeit its primitive form, please do no hesitate to ask. We will start with 2000 USD. If someone wish to buy it, then perhaps, if you think it is too expensive. Just send me an offer.

The balance of the Middle East is very difficult to sustain. Mainly because of the long history of warfare in the Middle East. I mean it has happened ever since Eridu (Eden), the first city, was founded.

The En, or the lore of civilization that is still what we believe in and sustain our civilization today, is brought forth by endless warfare.

So, the Messiah would be a man of balance.

This is what I would recommend the Middle East to think about; where is the balance. Not too much, nor too little. Just enough to sustain ones own power and prowess, not too little to falter and be weak.

It is not about eternal love and turning the other cheek only, and it is not about total warfare.

You have to tackle the fact that you live on earth, and the material world holds some specific challenges. But to get swallowed by the material world, and forget about the spiritual world, will send you directly in the arms of the dark lord.

Therefor, the path between heaven and earth is a narrow line where one must look out for the lurings of the dark one, and be pristine in the actions of a humane man.

G-d bless the will to see things clear.

When something withers, be it a plant, a human being or a nation, it is because the strength has vanished. It does not wish to step in the fight and fight. It simply lays down at the side of the road and start to perish.

So how do people react to this kind of situation?

Well there are several bits of wisdom and lore in our culture we can look upon and think about. First of all, there is the story of Sodom and Gomorra. These two city states in the fertile Crescent were in the final state of corruption, when Lot happened to try and save them. He said to G-d; if there is only one honest man back in the cities, save us. But the other citizens started attacking him!

In this story we see, that there is an ancient understanding of moral fallen cities as places of ultimate sin. So much sin, that even good people cannot survive there.

We see it in the persecution of minority intellectuals who try to enlighten the cities, searching for truth and redemption. If a city or nation is too morally corrupt, it will persecute these lightbringers, not using their understanding and ideas to rejuvenate and heal themselves.

Then there is Plato. In his view, a Republic goes through a phase of growth and deacy. In the end, where decay sets in, the philosophers are supposed to fight the decay and heal the citystate. That is why he wanted a council of philosophers to guard the Republic. This does not work, because who guards the guardians?

But in a situation where there are free philosophers, who are not institutionalized, I believe his idea might just come through. At least this has been my motivation; to try a steer the Republics away from decay and into health.

Plato has a true gem of wisdom in regards to the process of decay, that I have try to use in my work. He says, that what happens is this; In the final hours of the life of the Republic, the people gets so annoyed with the state of things, that they choose the strong man to clean up the mess. In this the tyrant gets to power, and he cleans up the mess, but in the process he gets rid of democracy. We have had a classic example of this in recent times with Hitler. The strong man.

So what do we do to tackle this obvious danger? First of all, it is about making a gliding process, where we clean up the system from within. I have tried to inspire the current leaders and religious heads of state and temple, to get rid of the corruption from within.

The best and most succesful example is the Vatican state, where his excellency pope Francis has been tremendously succesful in this regard. Cleaning up the mess.

If the theory is sound, and it often is with Plato, it will result in a healthy church with all the benefits of this.

In political life, it has been much more difficult. Political processes are often extremely dangerous, but to my luck there is still so much civil feeling and conduct that I have not been killed. Lucky me.

But, as I see it, the political system needs a revolution from within. The corruption, the lying, the dishonest behaviour should be fought from inside.

Some of the characteristics of the strong man should be borrowed by the politicians who are inside the system. Not to overthrow the system, but to clean it up from within.

In this way we keep our democratic system without sacrificing our moral.

It is an extremely difficult process of the politicians, but it truly works, as we have seen it with my work with first mr. Lars Løkke, the former PM of Denmark and also, most probably the coming, mr. Barack Obama, mr. Putin and if we are ok with that, the coming PM of Great Britain.

It is a balance, because at the same time we have all the rebels of the underground who wants to push the agenda in a less corrupt way. So the leading politicians often have to balance a middle leaning politics with a more radical agenda.

This balance is what the UK has to work on if and when mr. Cameron wins the next election.

It is therefor most important to keep the overall aim of the process in perspective. It is not about surrendering to negative warmongering voices, it is about cleaning up Westminster, getting rid of all the corruption and dishonesty. Do little by little, but do it in an honest way.

In this way elections are won.

As a final note in the equation, I would comment on the understanding of how we notherners behave. According to the ancients, idealism is the nourishment of the tree.

To live is to be an idealist, and those who are idealists, are what drives the entire society.

G-d bless our flagging but still living nations.

I think, that the main aim of politics should always be positive. For several reasons. First of all, if it is not positive, why bother? Secondly, if you truly believe that there is such a thing as spirit, would it make sense to follow spirit, if it was not positive?

Therefor; JOY is the aim. But how do we find joy?

If you look at nature, you can see the vicious fight for survival as Darwin, or you can see the exquisite beauty as Plato.

Art is that; a search for beauty, and I believe that there should be a bit of an artist in all of us.

Anaxagoras, the predecessor of Plato had a philosophy that was so real and true, that in it lay a proscription of beauty. He saw in life the touch of G-d. He saw in the universe harmony, and he tried to instill the human race to search for that beauty.

We have had a long time where we tried to understand spirit in the light of Plato, then Aristotle, perhaps now it is time to go for the true master of the three; Anaxagoras. He invented the systems Plato and Aristotle based their thought on. But the beauty of his system is unsurpassed.

I believe, that redemption of the Christian church lies in his works, because it can then level out the playing field with physics.

Find joy and harmony again. Be free as humans.

G-d bless the ability to be free.

I have a feeling, that I am finally getting through to Great Britain, with all my spirit. Listen guys, you know, I have nothing to gain from helping you. When you invited me to Oxford, I paid it myself, putting two months of work in the paper I delivered. After that, I have heard very little, I do not get anything out of it, I sacrifice myself. Right now, I should be working on some of my own projects, and yet I sit here, all engrossed in the English electoral fight. Why? Because, you are family.

We sprout from the same tree, we are one. It is a long time ago, but still the roots are the same.

So, my advice is free, truly free, in fact I paid it myself to get it to you. So there is absolutely no second agenda. I mean, if I tell my closest family or friends I work with the election, they hardly believe it.

So, from the bottom of my heart, with all I have in myself of support and love. GET UP! Believe in yourself, hold your destiny in your own hands. The aim is not to subject the waves, the aim is to survive.

Subjecting the waves is possible if you survive.

And remember this; at the end of the day, it is about who you are close to.

We are close to you, because we are the same family. Support those who you need and love, and you will be redeemed.

G-d bless England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland.

Denmark is the land of fairy tales. Everybody knows the feeling and the ethos, mainly through H.C. Andersen, but also through numerous other fairytales, reproduced by Walt Disney and Barbie. In fact all small girls wish to be a princess and all true little champs wish to be a hero of the realm.

This philosophy comes all the way back from Dan, Skjold, Hamlet, Christian the IV and numerous other kings and queens of Denmark.

So concerning conservative moral fibre, as I see it, it is quite simple. Reach in for that boyhood dream, that vision of you as the cavalier, that dream of you being that prince on the white horse, and be it.

I will give you a relative late example, that has been powerful for us Danes. When we were occupied in the forties by Hitler, the king Christian the X was not so keen on the arrangement. The reason why we were occupied at all, were because we, except for at few die hard intellectuals, had been cowards in the face of the Naziwar machine, and being half German anyway, we thought we could ride it out.

England, the US, and especially Russia did pay for our liberation, we did not, to our shame.

So how did the king tackle this challenge? He rode, everyday, alone on his horse in the streets of Copenhagen. He was a tall regal man, and an avid equistrain.

He did not say anything, just rode, without any protection. It was a silent act of defiance. As time went, it became a happening, people started walking with him, in silence. Just walking, showing, with the king courage, defiance.

This is what leadership is about. Not screaming and yelling, just doing, in and against innumerable odds, what is right. If everybody around you have given up, still you can get up on that horse, and just move. It may be dangerous, it may be haphazard, but as it went, the king saved the honour of Denmark. He stood up, in a time of need.

Now, after the terrorattack on some of my dear friends in Copenhagen, our queen, bless her, is doing the same. In defiance of political correctness, in defiance of terror, in the face of danger, she calls on us, and tells us to be brave. To be united. Thank you so much dear queen, we truly, from the bottom of our tired souls and heart, needed that support.

It is not done in an inhuman or uncivilized way, it is just done with dignity. Supporting the troops, showing kindness to our sacrifice, doing it, not behind barriers or protected, but out in the open.

If she can do it, we can do it.

G-d bless the heart of the queen.

I think a lot of people in the West do not really believe in themselves anymore. It is obvious in the political life, in clerical life, in the day to day workings of man.

It seems to me, that our civilization is old and tired. As in Rome, where Roman virtue was but naught, not long before it fell to our vicious forefathers of the north.

Ill told, ill fought, with a coziness and abandon that represents a dying culture. As a consequence, new more vigorous cultures seek to gain what our ancestors fought for over the last thousand and thousand years.

Look at the churches, some say they are just beautiful shells, we use them at weddings and burials and then not anymore. Look at our values, we sell them for comfort, until there is nothing more to sell. Look at our own self respect, it is so small, even though it makes no sense, when we truly look at our ability to organize, think, construct and invent.

I read this beautiful little book, it is about the second world war, and it represents it from the perspective of two children, one is a German boy, the other is a blind French girl. What really strikes me, is the strength of the Nazi ideology. It is so fierce and maniac in a way. Without any doubt, just a juggernaut of force.

When I met my first resistant fighter of the Second world war; Max, through my historical studies, he told me, that Nazism was extremely strong. So it makes sense.

My family of Jews fought the Nazies, and I have no illusions on the negative impact of Nazism. I however also see, that turning away from Nazism, also made us extremely weak. It fire branded and stigmatized elements in our society that we otherwise loved, like our northern mythology. It kind of monopolized the northern mythology.

To me, this is ridiculous, I mean, these are our roots, and just because they were abused, it does not mean they should not be valid. It is a matter of how you use it. For good or bad.

My basic point is; we have to be strong again. Not in a negative and Jewhating way, but in a positive way. We have to shed our guilt from the second world war, and regain the faith in our own culture.

The mark of Cain will always be that of Jew hatred. The mark of bliss will always be that of Jew love. I love Jews, from the bottom of my heart. I adore Moses, David, Ben Gurion, though he had his faults. I love Benyamin Netanyahy for his fight. I love my little daughter so much, that I gave her a Jewish name; Rakel.

With this, I hope that we can rise again in the West. With faith in ourselves, and on the side of good.

G-d bless us all.

It seems to me, that somehow my metaphysical and economic theories might blend in the case of UK politics. On one hand, I have tried to remake Adam Smith in a more balanced way, and at the other hand, I have tried to make a comeback for the Christian Churches and specifically the Anglican as well as the Catholic Church.

My point in the economic discourse, was the lack of conscience in relation to business, and metaphysically my main point have been, that G-d is truly alive.

In the case of his excellency archbishop Welby, the businessfocus has been “radical”, as in absolutely ethical, as I understand it. And in relation to Adam Smith, radicalism could be interpreted as a comeback to the understanding of business as a Conservative plight, where country, queen and flag is supported.

I have a friends within the Danish business community, among them the leader of the oil department of Mærsk. Quite an international business, with a gross production output in the billions. So it has a lot of people working, and it is as conservative as you can get it.

I was, to be proud of, read by the late mr. Mærsk, who was an old sailor, and a captain.

When I met my friend, I remember meeting him in this international headquarter, served by a german secratarie, business was done in mostly English, and I suppose I wondered why he wanted to be my friend.

I realized it a bit into the meeting. I told him about my ideas of a conservative reneassance of the importance of keeping virtues and values. All of a sudden, he almost jumped at me and he said, or rather shouted at me; We still flag with Dannebrog (the Danish flag). It kind of startled me, but the fire in his eyes was a contrast to all the international business around me.

That was why he wanted to be friend with a philosopher, who, by all means, was a leper in the eyes of everybody else, still is.

He was still loyal to the flag. The old flag, that came down to Denmark a thousand years ago.

So, we truly understood each other, and that is a story that both clerical as well as business should perhaps remember. Where they truly meet, is under that banner of the nation.

It might be totally out of fashion, alt modish and anti EU, but it still there, and people still believe.

On these vestiges of pride, should a new dawn be built.

G-d bless England.

When Galileo realized, that the sun did not turn around the earth, but it was the other way around, most people wanted to put him to the cross, and purge him from society. But after the time really understood him, he was commended as one of the greatest philosophers and scientists of the world.

My point is; something that seems strange and alien in the time may actually be right and will propel the human world further, after it is understood and accepted. It is because, human beings really do not like to have their world view challenged, they rebel if someone does that.

Take this realization I have just had with political science; that geometry lies at the heart of it. You can see it most prominently in Plato, who fathered the Republic. His idea was that societies start with a king, goes on wit an aristocracy and ends up in a democratic control. Hence the president (king), senate (aristocracy) and lower house (people). A triangle.

But in the works of Democritus, the father of progressive tax, you also see a lot of geometrical work.

These are some of the basic building blocs of what we today see as our advanced civilization. We just forget to use it when we create new systems.

Take Marxism. It is an international system based on Sparta, that was initiated as a very closed system. Because Lycurgus (the founding philosopher of Sparta) knew that his system had to be closed. So we have a system that was doomed to fail from the beginning. Russia is just now picking up the pieces.

Or the works of Adam Smith. He himself was aware of the balances of his ideas. You need freedom to be countered with rules and regulations. This is an equation. But we used only the freedom part, and forgot about the ethical part, giving us capitalism swallowing up man and humanity. It was not until I proscribed a cure, that would remake this balance that things seem to get into balance again.

Still I am trying to scream at the top of my lungs to make England take that proscription, and she falters to do it. Perhaps lacking the moral fibre. You have to be what you are in politics to be succesful. Conservatives are guardians of moral and ethics, and we we need conservatives to do their duty. Otherwise will the balance not work.

This is where Oxford comes into play. You are the lock, I am the key. Yes, you may be a little wary of the potential and the grand scope of my ideas, but truly, is it not always so with a renaissance, with new ideas? It will create Change.

I think we are entering a new age of enlightenment. In the 20´th century, due to the centralized way media worked, manipulation and hence the mediocre were the ruling party.

You can see it with the EU today. Is this the epitome of civilization? Not at all, and they are very much 20´th century created. Trying to manipulate and not elevate.

With the freedom of communication, it will again be merit that rules. Because, if there is a great market of ideas available at your fingertips, you would want to be guided or use the best. Why would you use the second best? You would not.

So, it will not be the person with the most direct acces to wealth, power or contacts that will propel the system forward, it will be the most competent and prolific. The best blogger or bloggers.

In this small window of opportunity, humanity has a chance. You never know when the window closes again, or the system somehow corrupts. I mean power has realized that comments on blogs are to be influenced. They have control over the blogging, to some extent, by sucking bloggers up in the mainstream newspapers. But they still have not all the power, and I am, as one of many, free.

The meritocratic system works, to the benefit of man.

G-d bless the freedom of the internet.

Our planet is a mess, our societies are a mess, our future and past are a mess. This is because we do not care about balance and harmony. We only care about the immediate threat or problem to solve, so we loose sight of the larger picture, and often get ensnared in more and more complicated and unharmonious frames of existence.

Today our societies are a mix of Aristotelian/Platonic democracy on one side, and marxist international spartanism on the other side. Add to this the different religions and economic systems, and you see the patchwork is a work of different strands of ideas without any conscious effort to harmonize the different parts.

So we have chaos and lack of humanity as a result. You see it everywhere, crime is more rampant, the families are suffering, we get less children, we suffer from lack of faith in our own systems. Because we simply cannot understand all its parts, but we can see that something is wrong, and that it does not work.

To add to this mess, the philosophers who have influenced our political architecture in modern times lack the most basic understanding of what they are building on, so they make bad choices. Not to mention the followers of the different strands of philosophy know even less, so that makes it even more difficult to make any sense out of it all.

Then, as a consequence, people tend to fall for the simple answers, and find a solace in primitive systems, that gives them an easy fix, and peace of mind here and now.

They all miss the basic point; there is only one cure, and that is to fix the architecture of society, make new balances, suppress some elements of development, strengthen other, to make a new and more harmonious house.

But, then again, if you make a new house, you need to fit it into the surroundings. You cannot just start all over, as the futurists thought. You have to know the old, and fit it into that. So architecture of society should be individualized, as in Egypt, Israel, the US, UK, Denmark, France, Russia. Each nation is unique, and need unique solutions.

There is one thing we therefor need to remember, when we build our new political buildings; the ideas were created with one special aim in mind; geometrical harmony. That was how the ancients thought. They new, and harmony is a matter of finding the right balances in the house. You cannot have a heavy beam without a strong pillar. And you need a strong base under the different pillars of the house. To make it harmonious, you need to see the beauty in the geometrical forms; the triangle of power, the equality in racematters, the pyramid of society, with the family as the base.

These thoughts of harmony is what creates a happy and content society. The more advanced, the better.

G-d bless the architecture of society, and may it be healed and whole again.

There is a lot of talk about a renaissance of England, and how this is tied to a ”Thatcherite” way of thinking about conservatism. How ms. Margaret Thatcher was driven by a want to do a bidding in her life. How she had problems alleviating the Smithsonian want for free markets and Hayek’s ideas of minimal state, with a want to serve G-d.

Well, the point is, as I see it; she wanted to serve G-d. How you do it will represent a challenge to all who are Christian Muslim or Jew, but that you should do it, should never be challenged, at least not if you want to see yourself as a conservative.

My angle has been a little different than that of Hayek and the other Chicago conservatives. I have stood my ground, time and again, when I thought that something was wrong. Not more, nor less. I did it, when the dot com boom faded and lives and destinies of men were caught up in its wake. I cried for justice and honor in the face of a live stealing capitalism that did not see the man in all the wreckage it did. Leading to my first book; The Good Leader, that was a wrap up of Aristotle’s Ethics, fused into modern business.

Then when I discovered that young girls in my community was raped and misused. I stood up again and cried for justice and repercussion.

Both times I payed with ridicule and antagonism. The first time I fell sick for ten years, the second time I was persecuted for another ten years, leaving me to almost falter a second time. By I stood tall, because IT WAS NOT RIGHT!

After a while I realized that there were several anchors to this way of seeing things. Adam Smith talks about freedom of goods, but at the same time he talks about the moral sentiment. A feeling for what is right and wrong, an inner compass, something divine inside each of us, that we as men can refer to. That is, in essense conservatism. To reach in to that inner sanctum of soul, reaching in, and finding that rigid stick, that burning flame, that strength of religion. That, feeling that there is something that is right, and there is something that is wrong, and with the knowledge of the cost, stand on side of good.

Jesus does it as well, Martin Luther as well, all the great protestant philosophers and church men had one mark that put them as the epigone of their time; they stood tall in the face of evil, of corruption, of the little seduction, of that we call ”easy living”. Being a conservative is not easy living, it is hard living. Fighting for something, crawling into that mount Moriah, to put the ring in the depths of fire. It may cost you your life, your money. Sometimes your future and your security, your friends or family. But at the end of time, you have served the greatest thing in life. You served your own conscience, and with that, the spark of G-d within you.

G-d bless England, and may she rise again.

We are discussing the consequences of the deal with Iran. Will it be usable, will it work, will it make the Middle East a better place.

Well, the main guarantee is now mr. Barack Obama. He will, as long as he is president of the United States, back it up.

But after he is not the president anymore, what then, will the deal still bind?

Well, who knows. We can only guess. But one thing is clear. I will there backing it, and that is almost as powerful, as things are right now.

I believe in it, and I hope that the legacy of mr. Obama will be one of turning the world around and making it more peaceful.

Can we trust mr. Obama? Well, he has grown, and is now a fully grown, mature, internationally leading statesman, with a lot of experience. Is that a man to trust? I mean, who would you not trust, if you cannot trust a man of that stature?

He is what he is, and he says what he means.

G-d bless you all.

The current archbishop of Cantebury, his excellency Welby is a radicalist. At least this is his own words. In his opinion, radicalism is at the heart of what it is to be Christian.

I have pondered a bit about it, and actually I must say that I agree. To be Christian is to be radical.

Why?

Well, when Jesus Christ was condemned to the cross, he did it because he was radical! The exact occasion was a sunday when he was, by the pharisees, told not to heal a person, because at that day it is not allowed.

Being a radical, he refused to obey, and went along healing anyway.

In the monastery that Jesus Christ is supposedly a student, the monastic order of the Essenes, they do not seem that benign either. The story about the warriors of light against the sons of darkness. Bright young men standing there with the emblazoned and gilded weapons waiting for the cry of the horn of Michael. That is not a benign story, but a radical story.

But if we look a little deeper into the matter, we see, again and again, that the matter where Jesus Christ took a stand, was ethical matters in opposition to orthodoxy. So it is not just being radical because of that, it is because radicalism leads to a better and more just world.

Perhaps this can be to some use in the campaigning for England; make it a just cause.

I think a lot of my projects, and ideas that I have tried to sponsor are somehow running together in the UK election. The passion for an ethical business, that has led to a rise in production output. The passion for a redeemed Christian church. The fight against the sinners of the caliphatists.

These are all ideas intertwined. But not understood could lead to devastating consequence. I do not believe in a crusade. I believe in a democratic consequence against Islam.

These two things are difficult to keep apart.

But if we do not, we risk ending up in a religious fight, and I will not sponsor that.

I believe in the cooperation between the leading monotheistic religions, and I believe the supremacy of democracy over caliphatism.

G-d bless you all.

Getting to know Britain or England as we say here in Denmark has been a long road for me. I started quite early in my young adulthood reading a lot of English ”trash” litterature as Stephen King and more serious litterature as C.S. Lewis and Tolkien. At that time, at had precious little knowledge of the difference between Denmark and England, and just relished the good books, and the old stories, the yarns and the prolific ideas.

At university I stubled upon Joseph Conrad, and that was really a revelation for me. I probably did not really take it in as everybody else. For me it was the sailing that really hit me. I am an avid sailor myself, having a 23 footer sailboat, having criss crossed the Kattegat and Øresund. But, it really fired up my imagination with all the old sailing yarns, the stoic captains and the old seadogs of wisdom. We have a bit of it here in Denmark as well, with, still, a lot of sailing culture and boats everywhere.

Then I stumbled upon Ivanhoe, then Mark Twain, then, then, then. So many authors, I cannot remember just half of them.

In Denmark, we have this philosophical tradition, that I am the latest, or one of the latest representatives of. It is called Grundtivigianism, and basically it is a tradition that goes all the way back to Saxo, and even further back to Hamlet, and further even. It is as old as there is Denmark. The latest and greatest; Grundtvig was a prolific prosemite and mixed Nordic Folkmyths with Christianity and liberalism. It sounds pretty strange coming from outside, but in fact it is just strange, because it is so advanced.

This philosophy has been unknown to the rest of the world untill I, by chance, started exporting it to all who really wanted to have it. The strength of it lent to all who wish to have it. And look at the result; blossom and spring so many places in the world.

And you have basically scratched the surface!

I truly hope, that the rest of the English speaking world, and many other who are descendants of the Danes will live and prosper by these ideas. Why? Because they are your roots.

You basically just forgot them when you went off sailing, but we kept them here at the outspring of the emigrations. And here they are still, just in an immensely advanced stage.

It still evolves here in Denmark, new writers add to the tradition as time goes. There is just a new one who has popped up recently, a young Phd. named Christian Nord. He has a pen of the angles.

Grundtvig used to talk about history being the craft of minstrels and singers. Because the myths were the glue that binded the folk together.

So he sang to us, making, litteraly, hundreds of songs and psalms.

This bardic tradition, mixed up with an acute academic pursuit is relevant today I think. Because people around the world are sick and tired of the barren academic production. They want something they can refer to. They want the Hamlets and the Bilbos to sing to them. Not just powder dry, but the living and the exiting.

This song, it what keeps us alive, what awakens us again, what makes us remember who we are.

G-d bless the fair isles of England, and may it remember itself.

To understand the seismic shifts in the British electorate, that brought us first EDL, and then UKIP and Britain First, you need to understand the needs of the people.

British values have been suppressed and trampled upon for two generations now. It started in the seventies, or rather it started with the 68 ths, and have continued ever since. A watered down socialist utopian thinking have been the ruling dictum of most of European society, with all what it brings with it of decay and misunderstanding. Do not get me wrong, I have nothing against dancers, being male or female (having danced the last 25 years), but I have something against a thorough liberal conspiracy blaming all who stand up for their country as bigots and racists. This is not right, it is too much. The balance has tilted.

This is what the electorate is so damn (sorry), tired off. They have realized, that the freewheeling days are over, and they want some solidity and ground under their feet again.

But they do not want some extremist agenda. They want it to be civilized. So scaling back the liberal ideas, is what they want. That is why they vote conservative. UKIP kind of puts this in a few bullit points. No more immigration, out of the EU and so on. Clear, decisive plans, they want to make, and it is a remedy for the excesses of the liberals.

But the British electorate are not stupid either, they judge the politicians on the qualities of their ideas. A few headlines is not enough for the culture that fostered an empire as large as it has, and has been leading in philosophy for the last two thousand years, if not more, if you count the gallic settlements as intellectually leading.

Anyway. Ideas for Change or for a change of course, should be at one hand, based on serious philosophy, and at the other hand, be seriously, and practically implementable.

There is a trend within Socialist strategy that has hit first Norway, then Denmark, and seems to be hitting the UK now. Basically the liberal politicians do not say anything about what they really want to do when they actually get to power, apart from vague hints on it. The electorate more or less fall asleep, and do not question what the liberals actually want to do. So they get the power, almost by accident, and AFTER that. They seriously abuse their power, doing a lot of amateurish and honestly unethical politicking. In Denmark, we have had almost four years of nightmarish politicking. The teachers were totally mistreated, a large chunk of the social welthfare was cut away, and so on. Haphazard and dishonest from the beginning.

Now, when the election is coming up, liberals start copying the agenda of the DFP, the equivalent to UKIP, in the hope, that they will win.

The Danish electorate is disgusted with the show, and disregard for the political elite takes new leaps infrequently. Honesty and respect for the rules and regulations, are crumbling virtues in a corrupt Parliament. Something we are not used to here in Denmark.

The late prime minister, mr. Anders Fogh, had a cure for that. That might be of some use to the current politicians in the UK. He made some deals, and agreements with the people, and then he simply stuck to it. He called it ”social contract”. This could be an antidote to some the ire and disgust people have with modern politicians, with all respect for the work we obviously do.

Anyway, make a punch, as Angus Young from AC/DC says. You have to make a good punch. Follow it up with some extra jabs and perhaps end it all up with a blow to the chin.

If the liberals are trying not to get into the open, force them. Challenge them, ask them openly what they are going to do with EU, the relationship to the US, to Muslim hatepreachers and so on. We have seen how the Liberals here in Denmark promised, at the election to do something about it. But when they got the job, the first thing they did, was inviting a hatepreacher from Pakistan at the 9/11. Talk about lack of respect for the US.

There should be enough to attack, and as long as we actually do as we say, we could give them a potential knockout. We just have to press our case, get the initiative, and get the ball on the part of the field that is not ours. Attack, not internally in the conservative block, but jabs, feints, make it even a haywire, full contact, blow to the jaw.

Just remember, make it deep. The answers we deliver, should be based on philosophy, thought through and honest.

G-d bless a clean but decisive electorate fight.

Being a fan of mr. Churchill, one would naturally ask oneself, what would he have done in the Middle East today? After all, he supported Lawrence of Arabia, who was one of the founding fathers of Israel, and a staunch supporter of both the arabs and the first zionists.

This seemingly inconsequential point of view could only be supported by someone as Lawrence of Arabia, because he truly understood the Middle East, not like most modern meddlers in the Middle East, who do not truly understand the vast ideas created and spurned in the Middle East, the dynamic, the history and the potential.

Yesterday, I was ablaze with joy for the deal with Iran. Why? Because, to me, as it may have been for mr. Lawrence, he and I see the historic significance of the deal, and how, deep beneath all the posturing and swagger of the Middle Easterners, there is the true perspective of religion in a deep and cognitive sense. Not just another part of X factor, or some stupid conspiracy of some modern equivalent to Hannibal the Cannibal gone crazy in the streets of Mosul.

No, he would recognize the teutonic shifting of the plates of the Middle East, some of the most ardent supporters of spirit, and see, that finally the glow, the light and the bright beam of spirit is again showing itself in the Middle East. Old cogs not used in millennia, are slowly turning again. Doors as old as Abraham and David are opening in a recognition that G-d is again alive, and he is here.

This is the feeling he would have had.

Now, I might be wrong, but what if I am right? What if G-d is again roaming the streets of the old capitals in the Middle East. Seeking redemption in the eyes of the believers?

What if there is a chance for peace, and for man to learn to be in unison with spirit again? What if this is the chance for Israel to realize its Kabalistic providence, and have a go on forging an alliance with all three monotheistic religions, thereby creating a platform for everybody to stand on, if and when man again will search for destruction.

What if this was his feeling and hope, and consequently the motivation behind the deal.

Then all the petty arguments, all the smallish material fears would vaporize, and peace would descend on man.

The Persians believe in good deeds, good actions and good thoughts. Look what happens, when they do that; they prosper, and get richer and further into the respect of man.

Why? Because this is how G-d would wish it to be.

G-d bless you all.

So we are nearing the election in the UK. The UK is much more than just the Hebrides, the southern cliffs and the extreme north where they are, honestly, still adherents of Thor and Odin.

It is a complex, advanced, intelligent, worldspanning system, that has conquered the globe, but is reeling from the backlash of the loss of the empire.

This has to stop. My best advice is; be realistic. The UK is still, apart from the ties it holds to Australia and New Zealand, the most powerful, by far, country in Europe. It has a gross domestic output that even rivals countries several times bigger than the UK. It has some of the finest universities in the world. It is still immensely ambitious and has a lot of appetite on the world.

It is still world class, and it should be judged by that meter as everybody else.

There is still the value of freedom, that propels it to rule the wave. Why? Because ruling the wave will give England liberty. Why is that important? Because freedom will give you happiness. The feeling of being unbound by anything, the vast horizon meeting your eye in the morning. The cavaliers of the sea, still roaming, still strong, still ready for a fight.

This is the UK, not what some people seek to instill in the hapless British. This is might and pride of being English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish.

Pride can be vainglorious and instill a false feeling of self worth. But too little pride, can also be harmful.

The UK has to look at itself, and be proud. Not because of evil deeds done, or tyrannical stranglehold on some. But because there is so much to be proud of! All the little inventions, the marvelous literature, the high, high level of civilization. Too little is also a sin.

So be proud of what you are, do not bow your head in the face of danger, fight! As you have always done when the chips were not in your favor, just because, what you have created around the world, is respected and cherished. Look at all your former colonies. Do they shift out your system? No, as when Rome ruled, the former colonies cherished the influence and ideas it had brought to them. Same with the UK.

See that, and be proud again, of what you are, of what you have contributed to the civilization of the world.

Forget about all the naysayers and the belittlers, the broken and cowards. Be proud of what you are, because you have, as much as anyone, and especially because you are you; the right to be so.

G-d bless you all.

I think all the talk about British values misses one singular point, that really makes the discussion what it is; stories, or values embedded in what we used to be.

Conservatism is that; going back to what we were, to find out what we are today.

In Great Britain, there are several sources to what Great Britain is now; the Roman histories as Camelot and the knights around the round table, the viking stories of marauders pillaging the countryside, being the best warriors of their time, of our time in fact, the gallic stories of romance and Scots of the highlands.

What does these stories have in common, and how may we say that we can find values in these stories?

There is a continuum as I see it; the beginning of the Romans, the consecutive fights in the 500´dreds, the fights with the vikings and then the expansion of the Empire. The idea, that there is a balance between on one side justice, and the other side freedom, consecrated in the Magna Carta. Where we at one side have justice as the ruling principle of common law, and freedom as the ruling principle in the democratic assembly. Throw in the values of equality professed at the round table of the knights. There you have it; freedom, justice and equality.

But we need to focus on the values that are really threatened today. Is it romance, freedom, justice or equality? Well, the justice system is threatened by competing courts called sharia courts. But truly this is only a nuisance, not a real threat. Romance and equality is not threatened much, perhaps romance because of the freewheeling ideas of the young. But after all, England will always be a land of romance. Then we end up at the most threatened value, the value of freedom.

This value is truly threatened. Not just a little, a lot. Threatened by an alien system in the EU, who have no idea about the free thought of the free man. Threatened by islamic extremists, who dream about giving us the deathkiss of the caliphate.

Freedom is threatened, and that is exactly why UKIP is a succes. UK Independent. The overall message the constituency thought to convey to the political establishment by voting UKIP, is the fact that the freedom of the fair isles of England is under threat.

This is not just an accidental value, it is the value of the viking ancestors of the British. This is why we in Denmark shine on the international scene; we invented the value and the consecutive system that was made with it; the Thinge and the Freestate.

So to fight for British values in a situation where everything is at stake, you need to realize that freedom is not just another thing we can live without. It is the very lifeblood of what it is to be British. The true value that Britain has spread to the world, through democracy.

Something to stand up for, something to fight for, something that if not tended to, is lost.

So, look into yourself, find your strength, you are as much vikings inside as we are here in Denmark, and honestly as the old berserkers stood their stand where they put up shop, so should England, so should Britain, NEVER SURRENDER!

G-d bless England.

Making a pitch against IS in Great Britain has to be seen in a broader light, and has to be viewed morally.

The fight against IS, that the American led coalition is fighting in and around Iraq is not only a problem in Syria and Iraq, it is, obviously also a problem in Europe at large, and specifically in the UK.

We have seen it quite obviously with the flow of muslims from the UK to the area of fighting in the Middle East. It is not ok, and i poses a major problem for the security in Europe.

The knowledge and the potential the skill the islamists bring back to Europe is extremely dangerous.

We need to realize this, and act accordingly.

But, it is also a political process, if we cannot name our enemy, he will be pretty difficult to fight.

In the election coming up in may in the UK. As I have proposed a strategy focusing on the fight against IS, both internationally and domestically could be a winning issue, that might just win the electorates to put mr. Cameron in Downing street 10.

But it has to de done very carefully, and with an eye on the potential attacks by the PC, the political correct.

First of all, here in Denmark, I am being accused of being the ultimately politically correct. I have pondered a great deal on this, in fact I see myself as an enlightener and a wielder of truth. This is not, supposedly, politically correct. But, since I am both a Muslim, a Jew and a Christian in a strange way, this adds to the eclectic span of the ideas I try to promote.

Anyway, as I see it, persons as T.S. Lawrence and his deep knowledge of the Middle East are truly the persons we should turn to in this discussion, as mr. Churchill did in fact. In other words, deep, true knowledge of the Middle East should be our guide. Not just our own immediate fears.

This leads us to the conclusion, that there are good and bad muslims, honest and dishonest muslim, and what we need to look at is the moral content of the muslim organisations we are fighting.

This is in fact a very PC way of looking at things, because the moral content is always what PC are looking at, trying to be the most aloof.

Anyway, I am not proposing a PC way of looking at the conflict we have with muslims, I just conclude, that if we look at things morally and ethically, we often never have problems with the new socialists. They actually agree!

Therefor, focusing on the ethical behaviour of IS; the slaughtering, the killing of innocents, the persecution of minorities, while as accepting the plethora of ideologies in the Middle East as something to look at individually, might just get the Conservatives an edge in the election.

In other words, instead of holding all muslims accountant for the atrocities done in Iraq, hold only IS accountable, and start working along with Egypt, Saudiarabia and Iran, as it seems fit in the great game of international politics.

This leaves the discussion; what do we actually do with the Islamists in the UK? This again is a moral discussion. We cannot just put them all in jail. But we can look at their affiliation with the democratic system we have.

If they want a caliphate, why don’t they just go to a place where they can have such an “elevated system”?

Go square in on the democratic values and system that was actually very much invented in the UK with the Magna Carta.

In this way you tout the traditional English values, and at the same time make a political front against an inhuman enemy.

There will be discussions further along the road, such as; what do we do with the silent majority? And what about ethnic Englishmen converting to islamism and so on. But these difficult discussion will have to wait, hopefully.

My experience from the campaigning I did for mr. Obama, the timing is very important. When I beat Romney, he was difficult, because he started copying my ideas. So make a thrust, quickly and decisively. If you get some momentum, use it to build up more. I will try to follow the discussion from Denmark, and help you the best I can.

But, with the tools here, you should be able to make great inroads. What is all important then is momentum. Press on if have the initiatives, never rest, just press on your advantage if you have your opponent on his heels.

G-d bless the fair isles of England.

To quote the old but still kicking British band AC/DC; it is rock or bust in England. If the Social democrats are elected, I sincerely believe it is all over. The country is still working, but it is only surviving barely. The long demise after the colonies were lost or started working for themselves, has all but strangled England.

This is where it is extremely important to remember that England and Great Britain is so much more than the empire. It is England. A nation of culture with roots older than most really realize. So I would not despair, if England remembers its roots, it will survive, otherwise it may wither.

But there is also an election coming up, and, though I see myself as liberal in some areas, I still support mr. Cameron, he needs to win, to give England a chance to survive, and with that all the Anglo speaking world. It is Rock or Bust. Not a time for the fainthearted, but a time for those with the warriors within, for the heroes of yon reliving their time here now. For the Marlboroughs and Churchills to get on up, and enter the fray. It is now or never.

There are three areas I would point to, that could sway the electorate in the direction of mr. Cameron.

First of all, a traditional area of conservative politics; security.

Islamists are going rampant in a wide area around especially central and southern England. A direct policy towards this issue is the possible key to Downing street nr. 10.

People are scared, and they will vote for the person that may give them security.

To tackle this area, you however enter a hornets nest. The Socialists have on this area put up the big guns, and are gunning for all those who criticize Muslims as racists.

This is ridiculous, but politics is not about rationality always, but often just projects that seem possible, often disregarding the cost.

This gordic knot can be solved however by a simple trick, or rather a political stance that will ensure that all the possible attacks of possible racist accusations can be avoided, or are difficult to use.

Stand on a democratic platform and criticize Islam from there. Do not critizise all Muslims, just Muslims who do not respect the basic political system. That is the rule of law and the democratic assembly. They are what are called, islamists and have a huge franchise in Syria/Iraq (ISIS). They are hated by most serious people, but supported by a huge number of muslims in the UK. We have seen it by the executioner of severeal innocent Europeans who spoke with a british accent.

So they have a presence in the UK. Make that a political, vocal point, the main point of your election campaign, and you will have a good chance of winning with a serious margin. What will you do to them? Repatriate them.

Secondly, you need to touch on the traditional conservative voters. They feel a bit lost, but have had a reawakening, especially with the English philosopher Roger Scruton. In a world with a lot of insecurity, traditional values are save havens. Not to mention, that the Anglican church needs support as well.

But family values, country, flag and solidarity with the poor is a path that will give you added support. Why? Because you need to support those in need, and the Anglican Church is in need. I know there has been some controversy lately, but never mind, it seems to be ok by now.

Thirdly, there is the economy. Here you already shown good progress, despite all the problems in Europe. So tout your wins, and explain how it was done.

This is a fairly conservative/conservative set of ideas, but this is what people want, as seen in the EU election. They want more England, less globalization.

In a crisis situation that England and the rest of the UK is living through now, normally the electorate will look for the strong man. This is the background for all the new conservative hardcore groupings. Some I have had the possibility to back. But I sincerely believe, that the democratic system should solve problems not the strong man who will supplant the democratic system. A result that is most often seen in a situation as what you are living through now.

How do you tackle that threat? By being that strong man yourself. Do not back down from confrontation, but stand on the deck of the ship as a lord Nelson.

If you do this, there is a very good chance you will win, according to my experience as a strategist over many elections, among it the latest of mr. Obamas.

G-d bless England and the UK.

The idea of the family is slowly gaining speed, both politically as well as metaphysically. We are now entering the phase where we discuss the practical implementation of all the different ideas of how to strengthen a family.

There is one tool, that we can use, and is a tool often used by religion, and a tool we know works good; ethics.

Today people talk about the food, they talk about their jobs, they talk about mindfullness and meditation. At the same time, they scream and yell at each other. They do not think about anybody but themselves.

This is where ethics comes in. Because ethics is really ideas of change. Ideas of how to make a better world, working tirelessly for improving that community.

Take the value of solidarity. Solidarity is in direct contrast to selfishness. It is about sharing those difficulties as a family, sacrifising yourself for your children. Caring those babies in the middle of the night, even though you feel so endlessly tired. Nor giving up on your wife, even though she is ridicously, absurdly demanding and tired herself. Catching your child when she falls, sucking it up sometimes when things are just a mess.

That is difficult, but this is truly the demand of a father.

Then freedom. Sometimes you need to be free, your wife needs to be free, your children needs to go without your endless supervision. Sometimes your wife just needs a night off with the girls, or you really need to call your buddies and hang out in front of a superbowlgame. This is your freedom, and we need that as well. Giving each other that freedom is very important.

The ethical demands on a parent, on a child on a sibling, nephew and so on are often not discussed or taken into consideration. But this is truly where you can make change in each persons life, and in the life of the family.

Forgiving, being one of the most important values, because you need that, to stick together.

G-d bless the family.