Long ago, almost before the memory of man, we had an enlightenment, the halls of Hammurabi, the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, the walls impenetrable made by the minds of the greatest philosophers. It was prescribed, that one day, all of these ideas would reemerge, and the nations would shine again. This process is now, we have seen it in glimpses by Mr. Barack Obama, we have heard it whispered by Mr. Netanyahu. Let it be heard, that never again will the light of the nations be dimmed.

Now, g-d blessed, these ideas are reemerging. They were there all the time, it just took the internet and a theoretical nerd to dig them up. It could have been me, or someone else. But the advent of the internet gave everybody with the time and the skill to look for the principles of the nation the possibility and the ability to do it.

It is an ironic thing, that just as the West seem to have lost the light of the nation, we see it reappear. We see it shining once again. As Mr. Biden said, it is now or never, we are on a hinge, do we wish to die as a civilization or do we wish to reemerge again.

They have a word for it in France, when they dug up the principles of the Nations a few hundred years ago, they call it renaissance. The rebirth of the nation. They sung it, they fought for it, they died for it. A simple idea, worth giving your life for. Why? Because it will give your children and your best friends, and your family a chance to live a better life. It is a well proven, fact checked robust system that just work.

Read more…

To really change things, we need to understand how change works. I have studied it for some time, to really get a deeper understanding of the issue. Here are some of my conclusions.

According to Aristotle, there are in fact three modes of change: Alteration, change and growth.

Alteration is when everything changes at the same time, what you would also call a revolution. As when Cuba changed from some kind of democracy to communism. The entire system changed. Also in nature we have these sudden changes as in spring where a barren place suddenly becomes full of life. Alteration is the fast change.

Change is when some kind of theme or thing changes its principles. Aristotle gives an example. He tells about a bronze shield that changes from being round to being square. The thing itself; the shield is still bronze, and it might even work as a shield to some extent, but the principle of roundness has disappeared and become square. The amount of bronze is still the same, so no growth has happened.

The last principle of change is growth. Growth is what happens, when the mass or quantity of a thing increases. The opposite movement; corruption or decrease, is what happens when the quantity decreases. Growth does not move a thing, but the thing stays at one point, and expands its boundaries relative to its growth.

Now, these are all good principles, and being Aristotelian, they carry some weight. But how may we use these principles to really create prosperity in our nations?

Read more…

If Iran needs to change it would meet a welcoming hand of the West, and off cause of Israel. Let us be honest with the islamic republic. In reality it is a bit like the Nazis take over of Germany. They seized the moment. In a situation of chaos and distress, they were the strongest opponent to the turmoil, and the people turned to them.

What they got however, was not what they had hoped for. They hoped for a more free and human society, they got a terrible control fixed system. Where everything is in order, to the most minute detail.

The backside of the Islamist society is a secret service no less formidable than the most effective SS sponsored project. The SS wore black leather coats, like the angels destruction, emblazoned with the skull of death on their caps. The secret service of Iran are mechanators of destruction, well-trained, purposeful and dedicated to the system.

Now, that has been a living hell for the most Iranians. Iranians are proud people, rightfully so. A culture descending from Zoroaster, Cyrus. Iranians invented the idea of good, and major parts of christianity are actually Zoroastrian traditions, conveyed through Mithraism into early christianity. Christian supper is a Zoroastrian tradition.

So, to the intellectually enlightened, there are many bonds that bind the West to the Persians, and the iranian traditions should be respected.

Read more…

We are witnessing a major shift in the power struggle of the international world these days; the waning presidency of Mr. Barack Obama, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, the advent of chinese powermingling, and the rise of Mr. Mitt Romney.

First of all, the latest international political development has been without my consent, and honestly, to be frank, these moves are counterproductive to not the US, but to Russia.

Russians are always worried about double-acting and hidden agendas. Look, if it is true that there is a deal between Putin and Barack Obama concerning the foes of the fertile crescent, the Russians are really at the loosing end. Let me explain. If the western powers enter Syria and conquers together with the Arab allies, well who is to lose? Russia will, most probably lose its Tartus base. An extremely important base to Russia. This is the reason why the russian generals are against the move. That is a long-term loss. The stance of America will change if Mitt ascends to the presidential honours. It will start supporting Israel again, and the power play will tilt back to the traditional Western approach. If Syria has fallen to the West at that point, the West would have both Syria and Israels back. Russia would lose its regional role in the Middle East, and the West would be the only serious player. I am not saying this to turn against the West, but to be fair the Russians.

But winning the Syrian war could turn out to be a Damocles sword to the West as well. Winning a victory and turning Syria into another Sharia/Islamist governed country like Egypt would be just another folly. So, everything is extremely murky, and nobody really gains anything from entering the Syrian conflict. Off cause, the humanitarian consequences are too high to ignore it, but the only real political gain would be if Syria ended up a stable democracy, and that would, at least, imply a serious democratic development in the Arab states, chosen by the Arabs themselves.

Well, there are signs in the Arab world, that some intellectuals are realizing the potential of a true Arab renaissance. The Arab world are still in the dark ages. The development attained in the West is not implemented by the Arabs. It is a stale world, without any gain in terms of political development. In fact, it is a little ironic the West connected to the greek and classical Egyptian and Mesopotamian sources through Arab sources in the reconquest of Andalusia.

The Arabs are welcome, anytime, my email and telephone number is accessable, just call, I will be happy to let the Arabs in to the secrets of the Nation. After all, Islam is also a descendant of the covenant Abraham made with spirit. Remember the idea of the monotheistic religions are as a support of the Nation. I am 100% jew, but I would be happy to help the Arabs to regain democracy.

Read more…

One of the main principles we have to discuss is justice. As Abraham was promised we would be an example of justice. So, what is justice really? I have touched upon the subject before, and the thing is; there are many definitions of justice, all the great philosophers of the classic greek age had one, and we are also bound to understand at least Babylon and Egypt to understand a justice definition worthy of Israel.

Now, there are two basic principles we have to take into consideration; the Babylonian and the Egyptian. I have done extensive studies in the field of ancient justice philosophy, and I think there is, at least two profound realizations to be done. Firstly there is the lawstone of Hammurabi. On this it says that the law was made to protect the weak against the strong. Now how may we interpret that. Basically, I believe that Babylonian intellectuals must have had the same realization of justice in nature as the Greeks. After all, the Greeks were highly inspired by both Phoenicia and knew the cities in the fertile crescent quite well.

The greek realization was according to Empedochles and Plato, that in nature, the weak succumb to the strong. We can see it in uncivilized areas without law, here it is the rule of the strong. Often gangs of different kind. We see it in South America in the Favelas, we see it in Europe in the ghettos (immigrant ghettos). Read more…

The covenant we made with lord, was made thousands of years ago in another age, in another mindsetting. We are entering war. As Obama is deploying warriors to the Syrian civil strife, the conflict with the Iranian/Syrian/Russian (chinese) faction is stepped up.

In this rising conflict, we need to understand and remind ourselves of the covenant we made with spirit, or rather Abraham made with spirit. What was it, that we were promised, and what were the deal on our side. It is quite clear, if you understand the covenant on the mindset of the Babylonian age Abraham lived in. He is promised to be the father of all nations. If, at the other hand, he works for the absolution of the idea of a nation.

Now, what is a nation? To understand this, we need to understand the ideas that roamed in the fertile crescent at the first stage of human civilisation. A nation is, as we know from both antique semitic/egyptian sources and the antique greek sources, what we, today know as democracy. The core of democracy is human rights and that is the rule of law. Added to this is a complex system of layers of power; the king, the aristocracy and the people. Now, as in Babylon, the democratic ideal has its failures; it creates moral and ethical disintegration. This is why Abraham had a task to do; to stop the moral failing of the nations. To spread love and kindness, but also righteousness and justice.

So religion is an integrated part of the nation-state.

Read more…

To understand the implications of the current occurrences of the world, one has to understand nature. Why are we at war with most of the muslim world, and other parts of the world? Is it because we are racist, or they rectify old colonialist scores? On a superficial level, there is some truth to that argument. We are responsible for some of the worst atrocities in modern history. Just remember the red indian and the slaughter of their habitat and society. Or the south american persecution of the Aztecs and the Maya.

But on a deeper level, the conflicts we see today is something completely different. Let me give you an example. On the easter Island, there was once a magnificent culture. It left us awe-inspiring monuments as the giant statues buried on tons of rubble. What happened to that impressive culture? It was destroyed partly from external influence, and partly from overpopulation. After many years of steady improvement, suddenly there was not enough space. The arable lands were too few to produce enough food for the people living on the islands. What happened? War. The tribes of the islands started fighting over the arable land and the possibility to harvest from land and see. This was a war of territory. The ideological content of the war was very diverse and impressive in its idea, but beneath the warcrys and the intellectual ideas, was the simple fact, that it was all about survival. They were too many.

Now when the West populated the American continent, it was, basically the same. There were a surplus of inhabitants in Europe, and the power of the Europeans to make conquest, and we conquered America.

So what are the basic principles of this development? It is the rule of strong. The stronger part of a warring tribe will conquer the weaker part. Now, strength comes both in terms of material wealth and possibilities, and it comes in terms of intellectual strength. A rich culture can be weak in terms of intellect. This is exactly the problem of the West right now, or was untill before the Mohammad cartoons. The Mohammed cartoons, brought an initial awakening to the West. We started to arm ourselves in terms of principle and ideological prowess.

Read more…

Being a Dane, I have a special relationship to the English. It goes back thousands of years.

I will tell you English a little story, or perhaps a few stories. The first time I really had a deeper understanding of England it was because I read the story of the founder of my philosophical line; Grundtvig. He was very interested in an English story, and he persuaded the King to send him to Cambridge to study that little story there. Remember this was around two hundred years ago, so the reality was a little different at that time.

Grundtvig enrolled in the ancient and amazing institution of England, where Newton has roamed among others. And he started studying the little story. He met a certain English lady, who taught him about freedom in the Anglo-Saxon version, and he studied on.

The story he was interested in was the story; Beowulf. I got hold of the story, and started to read it. And it dawned upon me why Grundtvig was so interested in the story. Because it started with the exclamation, it said; We the Westdanes. Grundtvig was a historic philosopher, searching for the roots of Denmark; the mythological and folkish roots. So he was interested in the English story, because it was a part of Danish story as well. The thing is, in the time of Beowulf, the English were Danes, we were the same people. That is why most of our traditions and the feeling between Denmark and England is so similar. We are not a colony, or a part of the central european mess, we are sailors and warriors like you.

Now, that is why I tried, very hard, to help you guys. It is not a superficial or political project. It is the calling from thousands of years back, when we were one that spurred me.

Read more…

To do business, one has to be cunning, industrial, but also honest and straight. It is funny, often businessmen are portrayed as evil and deceptive, especially in Denmark where the socialists hold sway over vast parts of the public service and media.

But, to my experience it is often the other way around. The conservative businessmen, that is, the old and established owners of business, they are much more interested in how people fare in the local community than in China.

Now there are however the new businessmen, they are often prone to flash their wealth buying expensive clothes and jewellery. But common for all; they have to run a business. How do they actually do that? Well, they do it to their best knowledge, and, often to the traditions that are brought to them through many years of experience. Take the shipping business here in Denmark, it has its traditions, and they go all the way back to the time we were vikings.

But, we need to understand what a business really is. I stumbled upon a gem og wisdom when I read an ancient scroll of philosophy. This scroll relates the story of a certain philosopher called Bion. Bion was a Platonist, and a contemporary of Plato. He was a philosopher like Socrates; lively, intelligent and provocative. He did not write any books, but some citations are preserved in the writings of Diogenes Laertius.

Bion says, that wealth is the sinew of business.

How do we interpret that? First of all, a sinew is a part of an individual living being. In a body you have the head, and you have the sinew. The sinew is the part of the body, that will work as a motor of the body. It is the propulsion. The part that will move the body from a to b.

Read more…

What Russia will contribute to the earth with in the forthcoming years, Russia will have to decide for herself. It is with great awe we look upon the amazing country so vast and strong. We, as danes, are some of the original source of some of the Russian culture, men and legacy. We still remember the great cities in Ukraine, these cities were settlements of Danes and Swedes.

This gives us a sense of shared identity. Off cause, with all the things that has happened after the cities of Ukraine fell to the Tartars, Russian society has changed, and is not the same as the Danish. Due to its size, Russia is also stronger and much more imperial.

I am worried about the war. War is coming, it is in the air, and I am worried about the outcome of the war.

Read more…

To really understand the debt crisis, one has to understand the background of the crisis. There are several principles at work here. The most basic is the corruption of democracy. According to Plato (and many other contemporary philosophers) the backside of the shining coin of democracy is corruption. There are several methods to stop the corruption, the most important is off cause enlightenment, that is the enforced transparency of the society.

But there are other institutions to hinder the corruption of society; the law, the faith, the family.

Now fast forward to economics, what we have in the current system is an unbalanced system. On one hand we have free market theories based upon Adams Smiths “The wealth of nations”, basically it states, that the freedom of trade will be a boon to all nations implied.

On the other hand we have Keynes, who believe that the investment in the state and state sponsored project will boost the economy, so that it will create jobs and so on.

Combining the insight of Plato with the current state of economic theory, what would the insightful reader notice? He would probably notice, that the one side is talking about freedom, the other side is talking about economical motivation. What is missing?

Read more…

To win, you need to enter a battle where you are strong. In the economical battlefield, you are not strong. This is due to many factors, mainly that a social democratic/Keynesian investment politics does not work in a globalized economy. Investment in infrastructure will not give you any permanent job creation, because the true production of goods are not done in the country, but outside the country. So the long-term objective of Keynesian economics; to boost production is not working anymore.

This is one of the reasons I proposed a Adam Smithian/ethical economic plan. Problem is just, that it is so new, that nobody knows about it yet. It still is the right remedy to the current crisis, but the intellectual spheres has to understand the ideas behind it to support it. Since I am virtually unknown in academic circles, no one have the insight into the principles of the policy, and keep on discussing Keynesian economics.

So, you need to open a new front. This is why i proposed the Civil rights front. What would that give you? First of all, it would give you a platform where you are the strong. Behind the economical discussion lies an identity discussion. Do americans identify with the basis; the constitution, the law, the principles of American democracy or do they identify with their race.

Read more…

Talking about the Iranian threat we are in a terrible situation. We are, basically caught up between the Sunni and the Shia competition in the fertile crescent. And we need to be extremely vigilant, not to make a wrong move.

Behind the competition between the Persians and the Arabs another, much more dangerous equilibration lies; the old cold war competition between the West and the East.

Really the competition is over, seen from an ideological perspective, but in real life, practical power stratification it is still very much in existence.

What we risk in pushing United States of America into a war with Iran is a third world war along the lines of cold war stratifications.

I do not say this to make a judgement on the strategy of Israel at this point, but to give a strategical explanation to some of the reluctance of the military establishment as to why they are a bit reluctant to engage in full war.

On the other hand, a nuclear armed Iran is not acceptable to anybody, not The US, not the Saudis, not Europe, and definitely not Israel.

This leaves us little room to maneuver.

Read more…

Listen, when the civil rights movement, with that courageous and honest priest called Martin Luther King did all he did to stop the racist division of America, started. It was not about what he did not like, but what he dreamed about. It was not a negative or divisive message, he tried to find something that would unite not divide. He found something; civil rights. What are civil rights; they are the rights we all, with no preferation to skin colour, social background or economic advantage, have as equals. I have the right to speak freely, I have the right to vote, I have the right to be protected by law, I have the right to judged objectively by the state. I have the right to go to school, and send my children into a safe world, where things progress, and they are happy. This the dream Martin Luther King had.

Now, what it really does is, that it gives the basis of a platform that we all share. We make a frame, we all support to create a safe haven for all. We make common ground.

Now that dream is not helped during your first tenure. It was basically forfeit from the beginning, because the “whites” are scared. They see a country they used to be proud of become weaker and weaker. And what they do is the opposite of what would actually help; they become more distrustful and racially motivated.

Now it is a two-way process. To be honest, there are plenty of racist bigots on both sides of aisle. But that does not make the project of Martin Luther King forfeit. This is not the time to lose faith, this is the time to fight. This is the defining moment. Let us be honest. We cannot win on the economic fortunes of the current system, it is not working. Some of it basically obstruction, some of it is international malaise. But it all comes down to winning the hearts and the minds of all.

Read more…

When you are persecuted, you have to run to keep alive; make new friends, skip the ones, who are actively trying to take your life in this and that respect. Be vigilant, and hard to the idiots and betrayers around you.

They always have an excuse. The most horrendous is the ones who actively try to take your livelihood and peace “for your own sake”. They think you are “misguided”, some do it because they believe you are “psychotic” or something else. Persecution has many names.

The media in the corrupt state is in now is trying to censure you as much as they can. I have had the honour to be censured in a semiautonomous blog/newspaper called “The Free”. Call that a bigotry act.

Now the right wingers persecute me because I am not 100% ethnically Danish. With my half jewish mother and muslim father, I am not to be trusted 100%. Good ol race bigotry, all white ass holes (sorry about the pronunciation). Not all off cause, but a sizeable part “do not trust me”, or believe I use “double standards”. In the Hedegaard case it all came into practical fruition with an all white (too many jews, unfortunately) supported the old white male, and backstabbed the young “racially mixed” person. Disgusting.

On the left the issues are different. There I am “too national”. Or, they do not like my patriotism. Come on, just because I am not 100% race white, I do like Denmark, I do like Israel, and I wholeheartedly believe in the idea of the nation. I did dig up all the basic ideas of the Nation, because, for me, it is not about race, it is about ideology.

Read more…

When we started the fight in Libya, we did it to set Libya free, and to strengthen the democratic development of the Middle East. Now, before we started that quest, the Middle East was all in defeat and under the rule of tyrants. We did start a movement, it halted to soon, and we should have continued it. But, be as it may, we did a lot of good.

Now, that is concrete and specific progress that we have done together; Europe and The United States in unison.

We stood behind you, we fought together, and we did some beautiful things in collaboration. Now, this is why Europe supports you. Now, you could say, that it does not matter, and the US could just focus on China and the possibilities there. But would the US be a better place for that on the long run? Would you not lose some of the ideas we create here in Europe and you can put to use in the great and free country? Take the insourcing idea, this was created here in Europe, and refined in the US. Is that not a good thing?

Well, having been beaten and prosecuted myself, haunted by the secret police, the media and my friends. I still believe, that having true friends matter. I still believe in the solidarity and love one shares with a good friend. And it is my experience, that true friends always try to support each. Yes there are crisis, but in the end we stand together.

Read more…

It is very important, that we fulfill a role as mediators and peacebringers of the world. Right now, there are two main powers of the world; Russia and The united States of America.

Both are vary of each other, and we stand, in all respects, right in the middle of the competition between the two. Well, both needs a friend that will accept them both, and try to mediate between them .

This role is, in some way a European role, and in some ways an Israelean role.

The problem is just, Israel is very new to the game, and, in some ways, I am sorry to say this, it is with the deepest respect of the legacy of all jews, but still, we need to play the international game of politics, a little more wisely.

When Bulgaria was hit by the latest antisemitic onslaught, it not only rocked the jewish world, but it also brought a few cracks into the vaguely initiating relationship between Russia and Israel. It is no secret, that Russia is behind Iran and Syria, and it is no secret that Russia was, indirectly responsible for the attack on the bus in Bulgaria. If it was an Iranian/Hezbollah attack, it is the proxy of Russia that is responsible. That is a very difficult situation for Russia to be in, add to this the success of the Obama administration in the Middle East theatre, and Russia is under a lot of pressure. Well, I have been one of the strategists behind the success of Obama, but, for me, it is very important not to lose the support of Russia. It is a partner of Europe, and a friend of Denmark.

Behind the problematic situation in Syria lies a competition between the Arabs and the Persians. And the arabs, being allied with me, has had a lot of success. But, this is not intended to wrap up the entire Middle East and give the Arabs opportunity to win and conquer, it was ment as a opportunity to make peace, and further the democratic and peaceful development in the Middle East.

Read more…

In my research to prove the existence of G-d, I have come to new eureka moment. It just struck me. After having read some really advanced and complicated hermetic philosophy for a while, I just realized what hermetic philosophy really is; it is the lore of the core of catholic faith. Why do the monks have vows of silence; to be able to hear the communication with G-d. Why do they keep all these ancient libraries under lock, because some of the lore of both Egypt and other sources of ancient wisdom, is still there to be procured, if the Vatican church chose.

Anyway, what is the problem of the church? It is a rising competition of what you would call Newtonian physics. Newton changed the game of the West in a profound way. Even though he was an alchemist and a magician, he really changed the way we look upon reality. How did he do that? By proving, beyond doubt, mathematically, his hypotheses. He had a knack of dominance in him. When people tried to discuss with him, he just wrote two or three pages more of mathematical proof. In this way he did succeed in proving gravity, even though gravity is a bit magical. But, the most basic contribution to the West, and now, more or less to the entire world, was his worldview. In this, you can prove things mathematically, actually the only serious prove is mathematics. Everything else is just superstition or knowledge not to be taken serious.

This leaves the hermetics in a bit of a weak situation, because most of hermetism is shrouded in secrecy, and very difficult to understand, and never really scrutinized by mathematics or dialectics.

Read more…

In The confrontation between you and Romney in regards of foreign policy, you have the best chance to beat him on your own terms. It is pretty obvious, that you have made a huge turn around. Before you came to power, the image of America was at its worst for decades. After the Soviet Union fell, America had a bit of a blossoming, but it faded again with Bush. Bush was an amazing guy in some ways, and he was a true dear friend of Denmark, he came here on his birthday once, that was a defining moment of Danish foreign policy. But he had his weaknesses, one of them was a bit of an insensitivity to other people around the world. In the Afghan war, in the Iraqi war very little was actually done to pay respect to the local citizens of the said countries, it was mostly gung ho, John Wayne military tactics. Do not get me wrong, I like Texas, in fact Denmark is, more or less, the Texas of Europe, but in international politics, you have to be just to win wars, otherwise you just end being another tyrant.

This was my recommendations in the Libyan war, that actually gave us a huge boost to popularity. Why? Well it is actually very simple. Just as United States really hated being under the british crown, everybody else hates being told what to do. People like to be free, so in order to give them that freedom, you cannot punch them around, you have to help them gaining their own freedom. That was the ethos behind the Libyan war, and has been, more or less, the ethos behind the Syrian war, we refrain from taking direct action, because people have to win their own freedom.

The net result is pretty clear; Libya is free, Tunisia is free, Iran yearns to be free. Egypt is really the problem right now, mainly because we were the hand behind the tyrant before, and because of the Muslim brotherhood, but the motive was clear from the beginning; we wanted to give them freedom.

Read more…

I just read the support Mr. Barack Obama gave to the poor people in Colorado. I do believe these words were genuine, and they are, I hope, comforting to the victims of the deed. I think it is a good thing not to blame and point fingers in such a tragic situation. No sane person would see these horrendous acts as a tool of politics. Besides it does not work anyway, so focusing on the victims was a considerate and caring thing to do.

We support you here from Denmark as well, and we carry your burdens as you carry ours.

Going to another topic. I would like all the members of the freedom and democracy organization that were so naive to give Lars Hedegaard a medal to hear my story. I know, that few of you will actually read these lines, since you have invested so much in the pretender.

Here it comes anyway, and at least maybe some of you will give the true victim some positive reenaction of my personal justice, and judge me upon the deeds I have done.

First of all. I am a Socratic/Platonic philosopher of a Danish/Jewish mould. My great, great grandfather was a pupil of the founding father of Denmark; Grundtvig. My great, great grandfather Ernst Trier, was a converted jew, and a proud carrier of Danish folk theory and education.

The tradition has been carried on from father to daughter to son in five generations. I am the last of my line with any serious attention to Grundtvig. My philosophy is a modern version of Grundtvigs.

Now, before I entered the political stage, I did not know much about politics. I basically was a naive, well-meaning idealist with no understanding of how things worked. I started my political career as a philosopher in the organization Stop Islamization of Denmark. It was right after the Mohammad cartoon crisis and everybody in the world was pretty scared. Now SIAD is a bit like EDL. Or rather EDL used, more or less, the model of SIAD as their starting point. So it is what one would determine “on the fringe”. The connection between nazis and the organizations are pretty easy to see, while as, in real life, SIAD emerged, after I worked with the chairman Mr. Anders Gravers, as a liberal alternative to Islam. The work I did with Anders more or less changed the world. The term “Islamist”, is one of the results, we worked on the definition of muslims, so that we, carefully, only attacked the muslims that worked on the political gain of Islam, and not he muslims with a purely personal faith in spirit.

Read more…

The world is rearranging itself along new lines, but following old lines. The time for democracy is both enhanced and diminished.

The role of Israel as a leader in the process is still up in the air. I hope Israel, with its legacy and potential will lead the way, but we will have to see, it is not certain, and many things can go wrong, but it is a distinct option to enhance the will of Abraham and his descendants.

Looking at the whereabouts of the world, we see new constellations forming. In the middle of Europe, the descendants of Rome are trying to rebuild a system in accordance with the Roman ideas of central management and direct control from the center to the periphery.

This process is contrasted with the countries of Europe that was not a part of the Roman empire. That is Denmark, England and beyond, Russia, partly Norway and Sweden. Unfortunately for Holland it is trapped to close to the epicenter of the new empire to be free. So they are forced to bow to the lords of the magistrate.

Now, this however leaves new room for an alliance of the Northern Europeans countries and the descendants. We can define a new entity of collaboration, based on the values we believe in.

What could that Northern European confederation look like? First of all, it should be a confederation based on freedom. None of us are very keen on being ruled by anyone, so it should be a chosen confederation, with the possibility to redraw from it always.

But it should, at the same time, be a place where we honour our law. It should be a place where we respect the law of the confederation as something holy.

This is how a Freestate is run, or was run until it was stopped around the 12´th century. We know this from the Icelandic sources, where the Freestate was kept living for the longest time.

Read more…

Defining the new paradigm of war, we have to understand the mechanics of war as of these days. Harking back to the two main war philosophers von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. We need to understand, that these philosophers are of another time. Sun Tzu is a bit more eternal than Clausewitz, and many of the basic principles of his philosophy still works; to understand yourself and understand the enemy is still paramount.

Clausewitz was a child of the democratic revolution, he accompanied some armies in the war between Germany and France. At the time, the time of Napoleon Bonaparte, war was a strategic measure of living men on either foot or horses put against each other in an intelligent manner.

Now, we still hold onto some of Clausewitz principles, but we need to fast forward til today. Before the Libyan war the Middle East powers were very succesful in their onslaught against the West. How did they do that? Basically they used our own corruption against us. By making often very elaborate Potempkin theatre, they portrayed Israel and USA as the evil incarnate. This was all lies, both Israel and the US are not perfect, but the slaughter of innocent children and so on, was all just lies.

So, in principle, what they did was to use the physical war as a theater to push their agenda in the media war. The genius of the principle was the fact that they realized that the media war was more important than the physical war. It worked as long as they could manipulate the Western, corrupt media, to their advantage.

Now, the Libyan war was a turning point. Why? because the situation in the world, mediawise, has changed. In the French democratic revolution, where the newspaper was invented as a propaganda tool, the practical reality did not matter much. The buccaneers could trumpet acts of valor, and nobody would know the truth from lies, because the newspaper had a monopoly of mediation.

Read more…

We are now entering another phase of the election. We won some in the first phase, and our arguments have resounded in the minds of the American people.

We have numerous enemies, and we have to shed some light on them. First of all, there is a vipers den, that we have made ourselves a bit; the connection to the Muslim Brotherhood. Now, people say, that there is no such thing as a muslim democracy. It is wrong, it can happen, Turkey is an example, but the differences between the basic tenants of Islam and Democracy are wide. This is the basic situation. Now The Muslim brotherhood was initiated to repeal and conquer us. They have been working on this almost since the inception of the brotherhood by Hassan Al Banna. Now this has cost us dearly. In Denmark, as an example, they have excelled in Sovietstyle infiltration of academia and culture. Right now we have a certain Burhan, a pop singer with dubious connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, he is all over the pop charts.

On the other hand, we have a democracy in Egypt now, and, at least for now, the Muslim Brotherhood are working along our ideas. I hope it is sincere, many people, among the jews are not so sure.

As the situation is, and the election is forthcoming, we need to make a strategy to counter the attacks by the Republicans based on the support we have given the Muslim Brotherhood. There is no idea in covering it up, it will surface the election from time to time, and we need to have an idea of how we counter the blow.

Read more…

The blast targeting the civilians was a move in the ongoing feud between the West and the henchman of the east; Iran.

For some time Ahmadinejad has been silenced, as he is under pressure from the leader of the clerics; Khameni. Ahmadinejad lost the election, and he lost together with his hardline section of the islamic revolution. The more Moderate Khameni is now firmly in power. This is however not an absolute closing call for Ahmadinjad, he still controls large part of the Iranian society, among it the secret service and other clandestine branches of Iran.

To understand the move, you therefore have to understand the motifs of Ahmadinjad. I say this, not as a cold strategical analysis, I understand the pain, I feel it myself, it is like having an arm ripped of. But we have to stay focused to avoid the effect of the stroke.

Back to Amhadinejad. Why would he pull off a major stroke right now? Because the position of Iran is deteriorating minute by minute. Syria is close to fall as an ally, Russia is drawing away a bit, The muslim Brotherhood is firmly in the arms of America. So on all sides the allys are giving away. This compared to a year ago, is a dramatic reversal of the game in the Middle East.

Now what would he gain from an attack on helpless civilians? He would gain at least one thing; the pain of Israel. But would he gain other things? Well, if he can provoke Israel into attacking the Iranian system in some way, he could sway Russia over to his side, and he could reinvigorate some of the iranian proxies as Hizbollah.

So it is a taunt, it is a provocation, engineered as a motif for us to retaliate.

Read more…

In order to realize the ultimate goal of zionism, we have to combine different items of philosophy and real world problems. Basically most modern political theories as communism and a great part of liberalism have the weakness of a limited scope.

The deepest theory is, by all means, the ideals wrought around democracy with its wellspring in France and England. But, compared to the scope of Plato and Aristotle, we still, at our current state, are limited by the distance to the original source of our culture.

An Israel should be a new idea based on the very core ideas of say Babylon, Egypt and perhaps some of the hellenic ideas.

We have to start with the beginning. First of all, it all started with Abraham. So the base of a spiritual definition of Israel should start with him.

Abraham defined the covenant we try to adhere to; that we should spread the rule of love all over the world, in every heart and every society. This is the core of Israel.

Read more…

There have been many redemptions from sure death and annihilation. The latest just the nazi persecution, but the repetition of persecution is like a wheel of a mill, again and again has it reached point one, and another turn in the awful threaths.

The iranian and sunni persecutions of the late negative round of fights are just another turn of the wheels.

This gives us a certain mindset, and a survival skill given to no other people. But it is both a strength and a weakness. The strenght of it is evident in the obvious fact that we have survived. The weakness is the mistrust we meet other people with. We always look for the negative trend, and we sometimes miss the positive trend.

Take the new positive trends from the christian churches. These are, in all simplicity, a tremendous boon to Israel. In practical life, it gives us the support of the Russians in the confrontation with Iran.

Now this is something, and a victory that has come about as a result of the expectations met. Why do Russia suddenly support Israel? It is because in the eyes of Russia, Israel is what it was in the days of Jesus Christ. They see Israel through the lense of him.

Jesus was a jew, and he represents the lore of jewish ideology two thousand years ago. So it would be a little strange if current judaism would be exactly the same as then. Many trends have appeared, started and evolved.

Read more…

The true mudlslinging has now begun. Dirty, immoral, awfull slander on your person.

Do not let you be dragged down of the effort, there are several counterstrokes to make to repel the barrage.

First of all, identify all the attacks on a prepatory basis. See them before they come, and let your team make a strategy for each of them. Most of the barrage are lies, so document that, and send the attack back from where it came. If they say this and this, let your teams specify exactly where they are wrong, and tell the real story. This strategy will hopefully work as a shield against the dirty attacks.

At the same time, keep up the attacks on Romney, but do it in an ethical way. The drawback of a negative campaign is that the negativity will rub off on yourself. People get a little sick of the slander and look for some positivity.

So attacks are good, but they should always be measured with a careful hand on spirit. If it is too harsh or dirty, and you are the sender, stop it. Factual, serious, critical and enlightening prodding is positive, because it will show the weaknesses of the opponent.

On the other hand, it is of vital importance, that we get through with some positive messages as well. This will hopefully contrast the negativity we are met with from Romney.

Let people feel your idealism, your faith, your ideas to build a better world, to make something more beautiful, free, courageous, responsible.

We have the good answers and a sound plan, this will bring us closer to the acceptance of the American people.

G-d bless America

The path of Israel is long and winding. It has been my privilege and honour to inspire some.

There are some victories we have celebrated, and the path we have chosen, has lead to more peace. Yet, there are many miles to wander and many obstacles to overcome.

Being a prophet of a kind, many of my prayers have gone to Israel, not because I want to be a hero or a man of honour. But because the implications of my enheritance gives me the incentive.

Prophets are supposed to bring new ideas and give principles to adhere to.

Some of the principles I have touted are brought to the modern day through many years of neglect. Like the principle of the spartan kings; always to be just in war. And by that principle win peace.

I have had the opportunity to present the principles to base the nation of Israel on. And they are just that; principles. I do not claim them for myself. They are princples, most of them, defined in another time and era, often at peaks of civilization.

However, I think the most precious principle I have realized is the principle of Empedochles. The realization, that strife and love are two siblings. This principle drives nature, and it is only if we realize, that sometimes we have to fight in order to attain love, that we will survive.

Combine this with the spartan principle, you have a recipe for peace. That is, sometimes, when you are under threath, you have to fight to protect love. But you should only do it, if the cause is just.

Take the fight with Iran. The just path was to fight the system, and not the people.

Principles are eternal. And I believe, that my humble contribution to the fundamental construction of Israel are there to be saved and remembered. It could carry us through to the other side.

G-d bless Israel.

When I first entered the antiislamic campaign. Well, I suppose I was naive. We all are, when we enter the international stage of politics. One of the most naive things of my own attitutede was the belief in the compatriots I chose. I thought, by being idealistic, I could change the world.

Well after many years of fighting. I realize, that what sometimes seem to be your best friend, is your enemy, and what seems to be your enemy is your friend. A good example is my friendship with Mr. Barack Obama. On paper we are supposed to be in two different camps. But in reality, we are friends, and have remained so for some years now.

Friends like the international liberties organization, DDL, EDL, you name them and you hate them. Are not friends. That came through to be with an extreme clarity here in the last organizational meeting, where Lars Hedegaard, got a medal for a trial where he did all he could to blame it on me.

This mountaneous feat, earned him the respect of all of the civil liberties alliance. Would you allow me to stand aside in disgust?

As you may have read before here on Rubicon, Lars Hedegaard used the entire trial to put the blame on me, and that is both wrong and NOT a defense of democracy.

You just lost me guys. Tommy Robinson, Lars Hedegaard, Alain Wagner, Mark Steyn and whoever. You know I made your every corner, you know I gave you a bed to sleep in, and a helping hand when you needed it. I did it, because we are supposed to be friends, guess what, we are not.

Friendship is based on loyalty and honour, this is the exact opposite.

We are now entering the holiday season of the election. Fewer people will actually look on our campaing, so we have to slow down just a little, not too much, just a little.

The relentless pressure on Romney have paid off in the strategic game, he is hardpressed, and his closest allies are leaving him. Going on a campaign train when he held a holiday was quite a hit, cudos for that.

We however can also press too much, and the electorate, especially in swings states as Ohio will tire of our pressure. Give them just a little breathing space, and save some money.

We have put him on the defensive, and he is, right now, trying to find a way to get into offensive. We will see if he will choose the positive or the negative strategy. Probably a mix. He will tout his business experience, and try to find some dirt to throw at us.

So a dirt repealing strategy has to be envisioned. It could be the truth seekers who could try to counter the blow, that is, try to sift through the attack, and tell things at they are.

Read more…

Living in the outskirts of The European Union, and having lived with the practical consequences of the schlerotic behemoth, some unwise politicians are trying to build, it is with a slight dissapointment and wonder I see the empirebuilders continue their flight against the ground.

What is The European Union really? To understand this, we have to look upon the historical development, the vanity of our leaders and the principle of democracy in distress.

First of all, the European union is a union forged with good intentions. It all started way back in France where humanist thinkers wanted to bring Europe to a status of peace and stability. In the usual french way; manipulation and secret plans, the European Union was build. It was to, through a secret plan, unite the wartorn continent.

Well here we are. The European Union is just on the brink of completion. The french strategy worked. It has now turned all the central European countries into a unity of some kind. It is difficult to define the political structure of the EU. In some ways it is a democracy. There is a parliament, a system of judges and so on. But the horrendous corruption of the system, I mean, it was made through the deceit of the European politicians, makes it absolutely unfit as a political entity. Usually a political entity is either made by the people, or by a bunch of back ally philosophers.

The citizens of Europe only accept the system because of either bribery or threats, and the tribes are suffering.

The rest of the world is moving towards a more sound system of ruling; the rule of law is strengtened in most countries, minority rights are more strong, religious freedom is improving. But in the European Union it all goes in the wrong direction; the people of Europe are the antagonists of the Eurocrats, the tools as islamization and theft of folkrights and freedoms are the tools of the bureaucratic czars of Bruxelles. There is absolutely no respect and trust between the citizens and the superstate projected by the elite.

The dream; to make a more peaceful world and a more peaceful Europe, has become a nightmare.

Read more…

My philosophizing has lead me further down a new ally. Before, I tried to combat Marx, Feuerbach and Darwin on their premises, in my own search for G-d. These are eminent philosophers, and I do not, for a second, doubt the quality of the thought of them all. But, to be realistic, there is, at least, two great thinkers of our time one has to wrestle with, in order to realize the potential of a new cosmological synteses; Newton and Einstein.

Why? Because both, or rather, the first, Newton, realized and defined the ideas of today. The profound believe we have in science as the only mode of truth, is not just the science of dialectics. Dialectics of a Socratic mould is not really respected, only one powerful mode of thought is really respected, because of Newton; mathematics. Newton called mathematics the language of G-d. Why? Because he believed, that the perfect truth could be found through matemathics. Well, he did find some truths, and that is, as a curiosity, truths close to magic, but that does not rule out dialectics. Properly put, dialectics can be almost as powerful as mathematics. At least the realm that Newton did not discover in his endeavours are still prone to be tested by dialectics, and if we can underpin it with the wisdom of the ancients, well I believe we have as much a case as Newton. After all, he found the same answers as I do, in the realm of Egypt and classical greek thought.

Read more…

The pictures of desecrated churches in Syria is spell of what is to come if we continue the support of the Sunni rebellion against Assad.

The Christian minorities are not protected, and are in harms way. The intent of the pro Saudi forces at quite clear; the aim is to strengthen the power of pro islamist or the like in the Middle East.

We see other alarming developments in the Mahgreb; Egypt, partly Libya are falling under the disguised prey of Sunni scholars. That is Saudi Arabia.

Now, Saudi Arabia is a vile player in the Middle East, they play both hands, so we are not certain where they end up. If the islamists are truly strengthening their ties with Iran, we will have created not a more stable and democratic Middle East world, but a much more war driven and dangerous Middle East.

If we continue the support of the Sunni rebels, we might end up in the direct opposite position as we planned in the first phase.

Read more…

The first glimpse of the beautiful schonnert “Shtandart” I got last week was something of an eyeopener for me. I love boats, especially handcrafted, ancient sailers as the Shtandart.

The boat was a part of a small regatta here in Aalborg where I live. I entered the ship, strolled around on it as a menial tourist, gawked at the details and sniffed in the ambience of a pirate like vessel. Then I, by accident, overheard a dialogue between one of the shipmates and another tourist. The shipmate, a danish guy, married to a russian girl, praised the ship off cause, but also the connection between Denmark and Russia. He told the other tourist, that the Shtandart was a bit of an ambassador for Russia, sailing around to regattas around the Nordsee to show the colours of Russia and make friends.

Well, it seems to me, being an avid boat enthusiast, that one friend more was made with me.

And, the openess with Israel is another motivation for me to like Russia. It seems to me, that Russia is having a bit of a renaessance. The roots to the byzantine church are renewed, the democratic system is progressing, and the dialogue with the rest of the West is positive.

Read more…

I remember when I first read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle; the endeavours of professor Challenger and his spirited companions. The young lord who fought for freedom and justice in South America, and Conan Doyles firm belief in spirit and the communion with parents and other deceased.

I realized, that he was a part of what one would call true England. Because behind the polished surface of a civilized nation, lies a beating heart for the wellbeing of all people around the world.

This heart is truly under a lot of pressure, and it seems to me, that the people are rallying to the bannermen of their nation; the Queen, the lords and ladys, and some of the best politicians.

It is an ancient culture, it has rested on the fair and meadowclad islands for millienia, many heroes have had their fights, their glory, defeats and victories. But England is now fluttering like a butterfly with wings soiled in dew.

To be able to lift off again, England has to realize where the traumas really was initially brought upon the soul of England.

It seems to me to be clear, having read some of the English litterature, and being in the outskirts of England; The first world war.

The first world war really brought England to its knees. Not only financially but also morally. Too many young people died in a massacre beyond belief. Hundreds of thousands rotted in the trenches along the corpses of horses and other soldiers.

England not only lost its empire at that time, it also lost its belief in spirit, and that is much worse.

Read more…

Several weak spots are already showing in the armour of Mitt Romney; he is not at general, he is a calculating, analyzing, meticoulous, very intelligent and basically nice person. But his main incentive is to win, not to gain the upper hand of America or the West in general. So he is not the best person for us right now.

This will be the general feeling in a very short time, I hope.

This gives us an idea about what we are up against, and an idea on the strategy we might pursue. Still we have to see how the election machine really works when it is up in gear, and we still need to see how Karl Rove will influence the election.

But there are other priorities we need to attend to. Basically we are sitting between two chairs; One: The traditional blue collar workers who have witnessed the outflow of jobs to China and the like. They are generally honest, hardworking, and conservative in their outlook. So they do not like the liberal ideas of free riding, hash smoking liberals. Two: We have the part of the electorate who are on the edge of the society; the gays, the jews, the latinos and the blacks.

These two parts of the voters constituency we somehow have to respect and give some credit. The really dangerous schism here is the discussion of citizensship; the blue collar voters are scared of the competition from the new citizens, and the new citizens are scared not to get a job.

So, in order to balance these two parts of the voters constituency, we have to give the latinos some, but not too much, and we have to work really hard to make new jobs. This will, hopefully, do the balancing act.

Then there are other parts of the constituency we have to reach out for. The most energetic is the young, political voters. They are liberal in the rebellic sense. They want to change the world for a better place, and they want action. The Kony campaign was targeted at them, they are all crazy about that campaign. They want to have some attention on these issues.

Read more…

It is a bit of a mistake to redo the same strategy in Syria as we did in Libya. Why? Because the times were different when we went to war in Syria, it was just after the Arab spring and the liberal movements were quite strong at the time.

The movement has ceased to have any real power right now, and we cannot use it as a motor to make more democracy.

We can however do it in another way. Democracies are dependent on a people. A people is often defined by a shared heritage and common values. As America, as Denmark, as Israel.

Now, one of the main problems of Syria is the ethnic confrontations between the different groups. The Alawites hate the Arabs, the Arabs hate the Christians and so on.

If we hand a free hand to the Arabs to fight the Alawites. The Alawites know that they are fighting with their back against the wall. If they fall, massslaughter might happen.

Now, this is off cause not a scenario we would want to witness, and especially if we hand them the power.

I know that Denmark is not a part of the force now, but I still support the West.

We have to do at least one thing; we have to prepare the fall of Assad, that is, we have to prepare for the refugees, the humanitarian costs and so on. The best solution would be to defend them, if they end up in the mountains and make their last stand up there. Let them, at least, have that piece of land to make them safe.

Read more…

It is a huge problem with the Latino acceptance statement. It will make the difference between loss and another round in the White House. If you wish to continue, you have to make a strategical reorganization of your statement. I do not say this to value the ethical content of the political principle, it is only a strategical perspective.

You can discuss it in terms of a conservative strategy; According to both Plato and Aristotle, the discussion of the citizenship and the sacredness of it, is a vital principle to adher to. According to Aristotle a new citizen would take around five generations to really be a part of the polis. Things were different i Athens, but still it makes a point, a citizenship is a very dear commodity to give away. The Roman Empire fell, when there were no more roman citizenships to give away to the Empire, because everybody had it.

Read more…

One of the worst thing in the election is the discussion on human race; Afro American, Jewish, Caucasian and so on. Let us be absolutely clear about this. There are no different human races. There is only one; humans. We have different families; some have blue eyes, some have brown eyes, but since we can all have babies together, we are the same race.

That does not mean that there are not cultural and small genetic differences between the different groups of people around the globe. That is obvious. But to discuss the difference between people, we have to discuss it on a basis, that is as close to how things are genetically, and culturally as possible.

The discussion on immigration is one of those discussions. Let me be clear; there is not latino race, it is ridicuolus. There is a latino culture that is different than the protestant or the jewish, but they are just as much people as we are.

Therefor the immigration discussion is twisted, beneath it lies a web of prejudice and, let us be honest; racism. There is one side; the Afro American race, then there is the other side. It is not a positive principle to adhere to. We are one race; humans.

Read more…

The best card you can play, apart from the economic card, is the foreign endeavours we have made. The wars we have conducted, and the results we have made. Let us recount:

– Peace in most of the Middle East

– The spur of numerous democratic movements in the Maghreb region

– The diplomatic pressure on Iran, that has made a huge impact on the reach of Ahmadinejad

– The relieve of pressure on Israel

– A very close collaboration with the major European powers; France and Great Britain

– The relieve of pressure from the Southern American Countries

– The friendship of the avantgarde intellectuals of Denmark 😉

– A new principle of engagement based on a fair and just handling of the conflicts of the world

Basically the ambience and the honour of United States of America is better than ever. It is looked upon as a wise and just player in the affairs of the world. After Putin got to power, the relationship to Russia has worsened a little, but it is still quite good.

Read more…

I remember when I was a young student, one of my co students introduced me to chinese philosophy; I Ching, Lao Tze, Konfucius. The spiritual and intellectual legacy of China is an ancient and equally awe-inspiring immenseness.

I salute this, and I do respect the chinese thought. The “Middle Road” is something that has inspired me.

I also do recognize the atrocities that the West did in Mainland China. The british trade organizations, especially the teatraders did some extremely horrible things. I do recognize that.

But, that does not excuse the open theft of immaterial rights and knowledge of West as it is happening today. Through it many spies and computer hackers it has leached the West for know how.

Now, a small country with no real threat to Western industry would have been one thing. But the current rate of economic growth has reached a point where the discrepancy between the industrial output of China and the West is not a small thing anymore.

As a consequence the West has to act. We know that the chinese military manufacturers have stolen many important blueprints of western military tech. This is not excusable, we know that in many other sectors the same is the case.

I do recognize the warm relationship Denmark has had with China for centuries. Especially the company Jebsen is an integrated part of chinese business. But, China has to play by the same rules as everybody else.

Read more…

The resent challenges England is meeting is horrendous; terrible assaults in english underaged girls, horrendous mismanagement by the official responsible institutions, and a very hard and natural anger by the citizens who are hurt by the atrocities.

Beneath the problems itself lies a web of mismanagement, lack of initiative and a thorough demoralization of the state.

It all comes down to the lack of will. The official are not prone to do anything. Why? because they are afraid of the consequence it will bear on their career, and are afraid of the public humiliation they might face if they act decisively in the terrible cases.

It all goes back to cases in the sixties and seventies where outspoken public persons, got in a lot of trouble if they criticized any kind of immigration. When the hippies and the progressive left dominated the public sphere, and did not allow a critical stance against the so-called “progression”.

Well, being somewhat a hippie myself, I do not necesarially disagree with all the project of the Beatles generation, some of them were good; the creative movement, the democratic movement, the environmental care. But that does not make me blind for the faults of the pot smoking and freewheeling freaks of the sixties.

The greatest fault is the simple fact, that they do not respect the nation.

Now in a world where everybody just went along and smoked another joint, it would be ok. We could just take it easy, and have another cigar. However there is the simple fact, that there are people who have another book than the book written by Led zeppelin and Bob Dylan. They have a book called the Koran. And according to that book, you are allowed to do the most horrendous things in the name of G-d.

In a democracy you have tools to prevent the barbarity of the kinds written in the Koran, it is called the rule of law.

According to the rule of law, you are not allowed to enslave girls, you are not allowed to steal, and you are not allowed to pimp the weak girls.

This runs contrary to the Koran. And as a consequence there is a conflict.

Read more…

To truly understand the economic policies a democracy must try to realize, one has to hark back to the founder of democratic economics: Sir Adam Smith.

He was a wise philosopher, and understood the intricacies of economics. Now, where do that lead us to?

First of all, again Smith had a wise understanding of economics, a wiser understanding than we realize today. We use his book; The Wealth of nations to understand the ways of international monetary machinery. Or rather, most liberal capitalist minded people do. There is Ayn Rand, but really behind Rand there is the Wealth of nations as an ideological underpinning of free trade.

In opposition to this there is Keynes. His philosophy is basically an easy fix to economy. According to his ideas, you pump out money in society to try to invoke extra production. You know, production of houses, infrastructure and so on.

Now this is, as rationalization, just a temporary fix. It will adjust the economy for a while, but it does not, with all respect to Keynes, adjust the true problems of an economy in recession.

Read more…

In the light of the current defeat in Wisconsin, we need to rethink our strategy a little. We need to realize, that the economical pressure and blitz of Romneys campaign will be a strong weapon.

To counter this weapon, we need to make a revising look at our own weapons.

First of all, we have a sound ideological battle in front of us. Let us recount; the struggle to rewind the clockwork of corporate America, the defense of not only the US but the West at large from islamic terrorism, the recapturing of american spirit and a society based on law and equality. Add to this a more passionate care for the wellbeing of american citizens in the health issue, and that will keep us occupied for the rest of the watch.

Read more…

To win the next American election, we have to analyze the difficulty of the current system.

According to the basic theory of a nation, there are three elements; president, the upper house and the lower. Why? Because according to the basic lore og the polis theory, there are three ways of governing man; by the rule of the king, the aristocracy or the people.

Now, again according to theory, if the government is solely governed by the king, it leads to corruption of the king. If it is solely led by the aristocracy it leads to corruption by the aristocracy, and so on.

So, in order to balance the different parts of society we introduce an advanced system where all three parts of government are present. President: The king. Upper house: The aristocracy. Lower house: The people.

Looking at the current crisis the problem is quite evident; the system and the nation as such is riddled with corruption. Not monetary corruption, but ethical or moral corruption.

This is according to Plato seen in the fact that nobody respects the teachers, the nation as such, the citizenship, the law. I may add; the family and the religion.

Now, harking back to a middleage control system with an all-powerful church would not serve us very well. We need to find something in the middle. In the middle between too much and too little.

This is the core of the conservative movement of Europe. We realize that we have hade too much freedom and too little honour or ethics. We need to turn the tables and be more loyal, sincere and respectful of our peers.

Read more…

The American election is extremely important because if Barack Obama wins, we have a chance to counter the threat of China, Iran and other antagonists of the West.

Let us be honest about it. The West is in deep trouble. The current legislation and construction of th European countries is riddled with stupidity and corruption. It is dragging Europe down. On the other side of the Atlantic ocean, America is quite a bit better but also burdened with many misgivings and strangled by an enormous debt.

If the American Union of democratic states had lived a more sober life it would be able to retain its power, now it is in the hands of its enemies.

The worst enemy is not Iran, it is China. We should not fool ourselves, China is an opportunistic player. We cannot control it, it controls itself. Playing both sides; America as well as Russia.

On one hand it collaborates with the capitalists of America giving them cheap labour at a horrendous human cost. At the other hand it collaborates with Russia to bring down the greenback by changing into other types of currency.

Who is the winner? Russia or America? Neither, China is the winner.

We should not underestimate the chinese, they are a crafty and intelligent player, trying with a deft hand to use both Russia and America in their own game. Their aim is simple; China are, in their perception a natural leader of human civilisation. They want to rule it all by playing a deft game appearing soft and meek, but really using all their resources to bring down the West. We should not be fooled.

Now, this is a challenge we need to meet. We meet it not by conquering them but by strengthening our own production capabilities.

Read more…

Following in the footsteps of the discussion on the Zionist idea, I humbly try to comb through some of the misunderstandings and obvious antisemitic ideology that many non jews seem to uphold.

First of all. Jews, or the tribe of Judah, is just that; a tribe. It is not a race, it is not a political entity, it is not a nation, it is a tribe. A a consequence the tribe has moved numerous times, through the last four or five thousand years.

What is a tribe? A tribe is a collection of people who descend from the same wellspring of a tiny family. An example could be the tribe of the danes who are, according to legend the descendants of the king Skjold. Through time the tribe has diminished or has been enlarged. The tribe of Judah is a tribe that descents from a tiny land called Canaan. This is extremely important, because this tiny land served as the intermediate between the founding ideologies of the West, or, some say, the world. The founding ideologies are Egyptian ideology that gave us the kingdom as a political form, enlightenment, mathematics, construction on a large scale, magic and spirituality. On the other side it is Babylon, the main polis of the Middle East. Babylon gave us democracy, rule of law, banking, spirituality, legend and many other items.

There are other sources to our ideological basis, as Rome and Phoenicia, but the most important are the two of the sources of jewish ideology.

Zionism is the belief, that the basic tenants of the faith the jews, based on Egypt and Babylon should be enhanced and strengthened worldwide. In fact, the Messiah is the ultimate person to realize this dream. The jewish people have held on to the faith, through all the years after the fights that forced jews to leave Jerusalem, because in prophesy, the Messiah will ultimately realize the dream and the quest of the jews.

Read more…

One of my friends have just died. He was not what you would term as a close friend, and yet he gave much more than any other friend ever gave. His altruistic mind and his sacrificial soul was very special. He was one of those friends who would give you things, and never ask for anything in return.

This is his story.

In 1999, that is long before anybody else thought about criticizing Islam, before it became fancy, and long before you could make an international career on it, my friend started criticizing Islam. Now, my friend was a priest. Not only a priest, but a priest of the finest kind. He wrote several books on different spiritual issues as near death experience and christian prayer on esteemed publishing houses. He had a wonderful career as a devoted and loved father and carrier of souls.

The public career was however terminated the second he started criticizing Islam. It was impossible for him to publish his sharply driven and very intellectual books on any publishing houses. His critical stance with a blog and a union was shunned by the mainstream. All in all he became a leper in the eyes of the elite.

Yet he pursued, year after year, he kept the steam up, payed it all with money out of his own pocket. He worked day after day, to save his faith and his country.

Read more…

The current development of the European project is interesting in many ways. The basic question is? On what lines will the development unfurl?

One of the basic difference between Danish and Anglo Saxon theory is the difference in the understanding of race. In England and beyond the different groups of people have always, at least as long as back to the writing of Ivanhoe, been seen in the light of race. There were the Anglo Saxon race, the Jewish race and so on. The culmination of racetheory in the nazi ideology was in fact just an end result of a development with a long story.

In Denmark the traditions are quite different, we have never seen ourselves as a race but as a tribe or a people. There are the Swedish tribes, and the Norwegian tribe (close to Denmark) and other tribes. This has evolved through different theoretical stratification mostly through what we in Denmark call Grundtvigian thought. (Grundtvig was the founder of folk theory).

So to explain the details in the theoretical difference. In England the theory was much based on biological research; Darwin among others. So, in a positive sense, it was a discussion of nature, Galapagos Island, different stratifications in terms of natural selection and so on. But, on the negative side; persecution of the Jewish “race”.

The termination of racetheory in the gas chambers of Nazigermany really brought both England but also the theoretical ideology of England to its knees.

In Denmark folk or tribe theory evolved around myths, creativity, storytelling, christianity, liberal thought and wisdom. It created a school system (Højskole) that had the purpose of enlightenment of the people as the end. It was a cultural renaissance.

Especially the Anglo Saxons have recently looked upon Denmark as a kind of ideological saviour of the Anglo Saxon crisis. For me, coming from a small country, it really took me by surprise. But after having thought about it, and being a staunch supporter of the Danish culture and our friends, it makes sense.

Read more…

The european Union is reaching a climax in terms of inability and disorganization. Let us recapitulate for a moment; Greece is, courageously fighting the corruption seeping from Bruxelles, standing up for their freedom and their own self esteem. The land that gave us Socrates and Plato still embody some of that spirit of yore.

In the north the plans have resulted in the decapitation of more than seventy socialdemocrats, in an attempt to rectify some of the burdens of rape put upon the hapless norwegian people.

Chaos in both ends. In the centre, the heavy thumb of oppression is put on the citizens of Belgium and Holland, there are no ways of revolution there, so close to the center.

This is, slowly, tearing the union apart.

Now, most commentators blame the rebels, and not the institution they are rebelling against. Who were the bad guys in the fight between the democratic rebels of the Jedi order and the imperial old guard. Lyke Skywalker or Darth Wader?

It is a silly comparison, and yet, the scale of power and the potential chaos that might follow a destruction of the European empire, is Star Wars material.

Being a socratic philosopher, it is my joy and my duty to talk the truth.

Here it is, as I see it.

Read more…