The Middle East is a source of conflict, because it has always been like that. Be it Christian, Assyrian, Coptic, Sunni, Shia, Zoroastrian, Jewish or any other of the hundreds of ideologies filling the Middle East .

I do not decide who will do what, I can only advice. But the advice should be based on ideas from the Middle East to work there. That is simple.

In terms of peace ideas, these are ideas that are in the Middle East understanding, because people see what war brings of misfortune.

Many local powers have shed the dependence on the West and are trying to work on their own. This is good, because most of the West has no idea about how the Middle East thinks and works. We just are elephants in the boutique of glass. Destroying things as we meddle.

But, at the other hand, if, by some chance, there are people in the West who actually do understand, as it rarely happens, the marriage of Western and Eastern philosophy can bring prosperity. As it is truly doing in Saudiarabia and Egypt these days. And as it will do, if all hands come down in the table in Persia.

Look at Egypt, how she prospers by using her ancient ideas in connecting with a European style constitution. It works.

So, ancient beautiful ideas all of a sudden are revitalized, kept in secret books for thousands and thousands of years, to reemerge! In modern times.

May you all prosper and be rich and honorable again.

G-d bless you all.

If we take a step back, and look at the ideological content of the UK election, it seems to me, that things are running together, and if we are lucky, we might just experience a certain synergy between the different parts of the Anglican society.

First of all, what really came through, and basically was the crux of the matter was the economy. There has been a lot of talk about austerity, and how the money saved by austerity helped the economy. Well, it does not work that way. The way it works is by building up production capability. This is how a country makes money.

China has done it by copying our production methods, philosophy, systems and so on. It has made them rich. It is like an architect and a carpenter building a house. The better you are a building the house, the better it becomes. If you are very good a building that house, you can sell it, and other houses, and you get rich.

So, we are very good at building things here in the West, all it really took, was a motivation for our production men and women to make things here in the West, or rather in the UK. You do that by respecting and honoring those who build. If you, like in many socialist theories, hate and ridicule the people who build things, they will find somewhere else to build things. But if you truly respect what they do, and shower them with praise and honor. They will build where you are, it is also called patriotism.

Now, patriotism goes hand in hand with another part of society that needs a bit of help. The church.

Here again, we have a huge backlash of demotivation and lack of self-esteem. The socialist ethos has all but wiped out the church of England. So we need to turn that around 180 degrees. How do we do that? We do it by kindling the faith. By actually giving the church something to believe in, to rectify metaphysics.

This process has been going on for a while in the personation of his excellency archbishop Welby, who is a former businessman, and a radical. So you see, the production people, who were scared and saddened by the lack of honor they got from the state and people, and the church actually do have something in common; the need support to make the society grow and prosper.

This realization has been long under way, but it truly materialized in this election.

There are a lot of things we need to do in the coming five years, but let us not abuse the position we have, let us be positive and benevolent. Let us not just use it to destroy what the socialists have left, but use it to build things. Make new houses, create a better UK, not only with money. But also with new ideas and creative work.

Patriotism has a bad name. But to me it does not make much sense. I mean, patriotism or the belief in a national state is as old as man. It comes from the fertile crescent, we have cities like Eden, Ur and Babylon there. In the classic greek time we had Athens, Sparta, and in modern time the theory that was invented at the same place that gave us agriculture and writing, has been expanded to include greater areas.

How can writing be a source of conflict, so to say, it does not. Man is a source of conflict, because there is a shadow within as Jung calls it. And it is if we do not realize this, and search for peace, we will have war. The clothing is not important, the intent is.

G-d bless the United Kingdom, and may it survive and prosper.

I come from this place of beauty. My great grandfather Ernst Trier founded what was to become the Oxford of Denmark. The great and beautiful Højskole of Vallekilde.

Vallekilde lies at the brink of the sea, and when you look out of the windows at the top of the school, you can see miles and miles on.

In the main hall, there are frescoes of Thor and Odin, hunting the orm of Midgaard. This place is so filled with memories and magic you would sometimes think it in a Harry Potter film. It is not the same, but yet in a profoundly Danish way, it is.

Each generation of Triers, especially those who are leading in their time, are supposed to expand the school. This has been my dream. It never really happened, I tried and failed.

That is why I knew, when I was called to Oxford, that I could not fail that school too.

At the surface, you could say, that I was just a passersby, not really invited, not truly a part of Oxford. But when I came to Oxford, it all really spoke to me. Not like Vallekilde, because Vallekilde is in my veins, literally. But because I could see a great and proud school vaning and I could see that it needed repair. Not in the structural sense, but in a deeper sense. Its soul needed repair.

This has been my work ever since I came home from Oxford, to try and repair the soul.

English people know, that there is such a thing as magic. Not as you might expect as a superficial thing. But a much deeper thing. Something about miracles and light.

We, Oxford and I, just delivered such a miracle. Isn’t it crazy? We came from nothing, and left everybody reeling. I hope, that Oxford, in the deeper sense, will rise again. And not like Vallekilde be snatched away from me. Once again.

Schools are living things, especially if they are as old as Oxford and my own Vallekilde. We need to tend their souls to really make them blossom.

Let us all do that in the coming years. Tend the souls of those great living, magical entities, so that they may deliver us.

G-d bless Oxford and its valiant knights, standing there in the morning sun, to fight another day, for her honour.

Well, as AC DC said, it was Rock or Bust. Given the the result, I suppose it is ROCK!

Well done everybody, you stood up for your queen and country, you refused to give up, spitting defeat in the face. Well done.

One might put a few words on analysis, why was it done? First of all; good deeds lead to luck. By focusing on the positive things, luck was in the side of the Tories. That is a lesson that should be carved into the first stone page of every campaigners book from here on. I got it from an ancient Anglo-Saxon poem in fact. Good deeds lead to luck.

Then at the other hand, there were some mudslinging as well, at least so it seems. But if you really focus on the actual meat of the messages, it was truly positive; using the foundation laid by the austerity, to build up the country again.

Then there is the unfortunate situation of UKIP. I would not be so sorry about it really, but look forward at the EU election as what really matters. UKIP set the agenda, and has moved the entire political system their way, that is why they lost. The other parties have taken their ideas. What is most important; to have the honor, or to truly make a difference? I would vote, being the most successful campaigner on earth, and receiving absolutely nothing for it, except for ridicule and persecution, for the service to matter. It is not about yourself, it is about the service you do. You may die on the way, but as long as the country wins, you should be ready to commit that sacrifice.

Then there is the Labour. Utter and total destruction, why? Basically because of a lack of new ideas. The chest of new an inspiring things to do is empty. It strikes me, that Neil Kinnock, the husband of our current Danish PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt had all the opportunity to win me over here in Denmark. After all, I have supported, unflinchingly mr. Barack Obama, but I suppose the other way, that of persecution, made more sense to him. You chose, you had the effect.

So what are really the things we face. First of all, I believe we face a situation where UKIP has a great claim in changing the system. It is not fair to them, and something should be done to rectify that way. One way is to follow systems in Denmark, Schwitzerland or Israel. That is a representative percentage of electioneers reflecting the actual vote. This will however have the obvious drawback, that local candidates will not feel as motivated to fight for their constituency, but at the other hand bringing change of national spirit harder to materialize. I suppose it is a discussion worth, I will chip in on it to draw some parallels to other classical constitutions as the Athenian and Spartan, and others of interest, if needed.

Finally, who won really? Was it mr. Cameron? No he brought the actual win through, but he is a representative of something, the tip of the iceberg so to say. The best man of his backers.

No, it was something else, in a powerleague that outshines mr. Cameron completely, with all respect, it was the Shire that won. It was Oxfordshire, that dream or fatamorgana of ancient power that stood up, awaken from its slumber and started fighting with a power so immense, that we will still see what will come of it.

It is not a posh university, it is not a dying thing. It is a conservative humanistic dog of war, and it has entered the fray, beware all enemies of England, because England has awoken and it is fighting. With its back against the wall, but in this position it is at its very best.

G-d bless all, winners and losers, and may G-d heal your wounds and dampen the spirit of those who do this of their own winning, and spur those who do it to serve.

There is one thing most Brits agree upon, being Scotsmen, English, Welsh og Irish. They do not like the EU. It is seen, and that is right, as a continental mess trapping smallish states into a web of bureaucracy and mismanagement.

EU seems to go well with most of the southern European hemisphere, but up here in the North in the “Anglo-Saxon” world, I suppose that is Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Great Britain and Holland, plus a part of Belgium, and a part of France, we do not like the centralist quasi old fashioned Roman way of doing things. We feel like another reformation, because of the creeping corruption coming from the south. This is, in many ways, wrong, but old habits die hard, and that is as it has always been seen, in the last two thousand years.

Anyway, the UK is breaking apart, due to the pressure the EU is putting on nation states. Nation states need more than just football and the fading anthem to hold it together, it needs real vested power. Not just superficial things. As a consequence, the UK is falling apart.

Now, the obvious medication would be to rip out the heart of Europe and feed it to the lions. We are doing that, and I will personally make sure this happens, as it is ripping into Denmark, and searing all the vital cords between the Danish political class and the people.

But what comes after? As I see it, and perhaps this could be a way, we could make a northern union based on our own values like democracy and equality.

This would potentially settle the fuss in the UK, making us all stronger. I know that the coming PM of Denmark mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen would potentially look favorably on the idea, and this may just on one hand give us all a viable democratic construction, and at the other hand strengthen some of the wishes of the Scots. It is a good idea, and it could be developed further.

At least, we have this opportunity, and perhaps this could truly be that crowbar that would prie open the door for at renewed loyalty to the king and the queens of the beautiful isles of the hebriedes and beyond.

G-d bless the future, and may it look bright.

I have two good friends who are both very different, but still, basically try to fight the same fight. The fight for truth.

One of them you all know as the “radical lady” who got someone shot because of a picture of Mohammad in Texas, blessed be him.

But the other one, you probably do not know. He is an unknown writer, even unknown in Denmark.

His name is Ibi-Pipi, but that is only a recent addition to his signature. In fact he was, until recently, called such a mundane thing as Per Erik.

It however changed when he realized that he was a woman. Or, well not really a woman, he feels like a female lesbian, trapped in a male body, … or something. Anyway, because of the sad predicament, he resolutely changed his gender. A new and very politically correct rule has made it possible for said misnomers, who feel abundantly trapped in someone else’s body, to emancipate themselves and change their gender; officially. Truly, officially, on drivers license, in the bank, and most precarious of all, in the swimming pool……

Being a man, or perhaps a woman, of his words, he therefor, as any persecuted minority, crusaded to the local swimming pool. In the most posh and presumptious city called Viborg. A smallish place with great ambition in the field of appearance.

Mustering all his courage, he ventured into the changing room, and started pulling off his clothes, reaching for a fine bathing suit of womanish proportions.

This however turned into a hoolabalooh of fuss, since, at the time of the day he so chose his endeavor, mostly elderly women used the facility. They, obviously, did not understand the inner conflicts of poor Ibi-Pipi, formerly known as Per Erik.

But, to the rescue, came a political correct headmistress of the swimming pool, and saved the day by, at one hand, respecting the feelings of Ibi-pipi, but at the other hand saving the grace of the sensible eyes of the elderly women, by ushering Ibi-pipi into a room usually used when disabled persons had to change in the swimming pool.

But, o woe, o misery. This really hurt Ibi-Pipi, because there he was, in a room usually used for handicapped people. And he felt a bit disabled by the prerogative. This, while he tried to emancipate his inner lesbian!

But, he will have to carry on, finding his inner lady, lesbian, female. Oh whatever! Because, the keen observer will see, that the king did not have in clothes on, islamophobia is a lie, and perhaps Ibi-Pipi IS trying to get a message across to us, we all sitting here in our plush armchairs, having all the right opinions, because, just perhaps, have we gone a little too far in protecting all kinds of minorities, without being reflective on it.

Do not get me wrong, I really like gays. In fact, I love when they do all their glitter and party thing. But, maybe we should look on ourselves from time to time, and be humble.

G-d bless the light of the artists.

I think we have finally found a way to truly turn the tide of the West. The dangers, the fall, the colossal tide of misfortune, that has swept over us after the fall of the British empire, has finally come to a halt, and a new generation of humanistic conservatives will perhaps make a vanguard of repair and redeem the people of North.

The expansion of the Vikings is not new, it started with the sea peoples that came to be Jews and Spartans, and continued with the Rus, the British empire and now with a renewed focus on the virtues of our people.

We are what we are, simple but brave, inexhaustible and sturdy, and yet true to our friends and family. We prefer freedom and stability, the fact that man can roam the oceans and the prairie is what we like.

If we manage to turn this tide, and so it seems, we will have a brief respite until the next monumental fight and strife. Because this is what we are; fighters first and foremost. We prefer to fight, to use our strong hands and minds to make freedom where we are.

This attitude has found many reflections and manifestations. Many local colorings according to the natural habitat. As in russia, where there are no borders and a very cold night. Spurring the warmth of heart and strength in abundance. As in Australia where the vision has grown into at one hand a liberal society, and at the other hand a conservative shell that protects all. Many ways, many local reflections. But we have to remember, that deep down, behind all the veils and turns of events, lie a fighter. This is truly what we are. Fighters, and we will always remain so. Be it Jew, gentile, Australian, American, English, Scottish, Welsh, or any other descendant of those hardened warriors in their sturdy and lethal boats, roaming the sea.

G-d bless our freedom, may we never lose it.

To really save something, you truly need to understand it. I remember reading in mr. Boris Johnsons book about Mr. Churchill, that in the eve of the battle between the “narzies” and England, Churchill stood up, and made Great Britain stand up by using the old words, the Anglo Saxon words.

I have pondered a bit about that, and it strikes me, that there are somehow two layers in the English language; the Latin and the Anglo Saxon. The Latin is often civilised, intelligent, superior in use and spirit. While as the Anglo Saxon words are simple but strong.

This dichotomy goes through art and society in many ways. As you can see in the difference between Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. Tolkien being the old school shire man and Anglo Saxon, C.S. Lewis being the radical Christian and thus more refined in a way.

In times of need and understanding, one needs to understand both perspectives to really understand what Great Britain is. But in times where the country is in need of strength, one seems to draw on the Anglo Saxon roots, the Danish roots, the raw power that lies in the core of our shared culture.

So you need to understand what our view of the world is, and what this gives as incentive to the people.

Danes are simple but strong. We are focused, not just focused but die hard aiming at a single point in the horizon. This on one hand makes us live too much in the future. Because we seem to focus on what will come, but at the other hand makes us extremely persistent. Take the example of Frodo. He went through hell, sacrificed his life, his future for the world. But look a little deeper and you will see why he really sacrificed himself; he did it for the shire.

This is the deepest understanding of what it is to be Anglo Saxon. You sacrifice yourself for you local community. In Denmark we have an old word called “frænder”. It is the same as the English word “friends”. It is, in Danish, more than just a superficial understanding of some connection to someone. It carries the understanding of a sacrificing relationship. Where you sacrifice yourself for your loved ones, for your friends, for the shire.

This is truly what it is to be Danish. To have a simple but strong community, to have friends, and then go to hell and beyond to save them and help them. As Sam did to Frodo.

Deep down, this is our true strength, and it is reflected in towering persons as Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and mr. Winston Churchill. Take of all the layers of philosophy and thought, and deep down you see that shireman, just fighting to keep the shire save.

Do that, and you truly touch upon something vital and very, very important.

Come on David be yourself, fight for Oxfordshire, you can do it, do not lose steam, we believe in you, so COME ON!

G-d bless the fair isles of all of Great Britain.

The election is not really moving in the British final phase. The problem is pretty obvious; it is about the content of the political ideas of both parties.

In England, the message has been wheeled around the economy, taking in the 2013 election in the US as an ideal. Here it was truly mostly about the economy and less about immigration, the fight against IS and so on.

The reality in Europe is however quite different. Here immigration is linked to the question about the IS fight. Because the immigrants are the IS. A huge swath of the immigrants that come from mostly muslim countries swear allegiance to IS, and as a consequence the two issues are interlinked.

To break the gridlock, the conservatives must do inroads into this uncharted territory.

In Denmark it is pretty much the same, but we have had the discussion in the political system for a long time, making the discussions very detailed.

One first thing is to try and get a humanistic view on the problems. What we should definitely not do, is to go all gung ho racist on the issue, in fact, we should do the opposite. Look at the obvious racist problems there are within immigrant communities, as the antisemitic persecution obvious in France and Denmark. As the genderproblems, as the persecution of Christian minorities in Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt and other Middle East countries.

That is, the obvious problem with many immigrants is the fact that they are not humanistic, but on the contrary totally maniacal racist.

This view on the issues will ensure a viable and sustainable criticism of the policies that are at place. In fact, until the election started, great inroads were done to the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK, and many of the other problems.

If the Conservatives wish to win, you or we, have to come to terms with these issues and get a humanistic grip on them. Otherwise we will be hardpressed.

G-d bless the fair isles of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Well, after a long, or in fact, to be absoluty honest, rather longish, or perhaps, well you could call it short, discussion with one of my friends concerning an art exhibition we are doing together, I have decided to make a bold strike, and start as a painter. In the noble tradition Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and other renaissance painters. Ok, theoretically I might be on their level, but in matters of skill, I am far, far below, I admit!

But, you have to start somewhere, and perhaps this is a bit of inspiration to someone who likes renaissance art.

My first project is about finding beauty in nature. According to the Italian mathematician Fibonacci, there is a mathematical equation, that is found again and again in nature. It is a clever geometrical form, where you add the two last numbers in a row of numbers together. It creates a building block that grows exponentially. You find it all around nature, in your face, where it constitutes a number of measures, in waves in the ocean, in galaxies. Above, you can see it represented in a Nautilus shell. This is beauty as G-d wanted it. Because why is this pattern everywhere, had it not been for an intelligent design?

You call it the fingerprint of G-d.

If you wish to acquire said painting, albeit its primitive form, please do no hesitate to ask. We will start with 2000 USD. If someone wish to buy it, then perhaps, if you think it is too expensive. Just send me an offer.

The balance of the Middle East is very difficult to sustain. Mainly because of the long history of warfare in the Middle East. I mean it has happened ever since Eridu (Eden), the first city, was founded.

The En, or the lore of civilization that is still what we believe in and sustain our civilization today, is brought forth by endless warfare.

So, the Messiah would be a man of balance.

This is what I would recommend the Middle East to think about; where is the balance. Not too much, nor too little. Just enough to sustain ones own power and prowess, not too little to falter and be weak.

It is not about eternal love and turning the other cheek only, and it is not about total warfare.

You have to tackle the fact that you live on earth, and the material world holds some specific challenges. But to get swallowed by the material world, and forget about the spiritual world, will send you directly in the arms of the dark lord.

Therefor, the path between heaven and earth is a narrow line where one must look out for the lurings of the dark one, and be pristine in the actions of a humane man.

G-d bless the will to see things clear.

When something withers, be it a plant, a human being or a nation, it is because the strength has vanished. It does not wish to step in the fight and fight. It simply lays down at the side of the road and start to perish.

So how do people react to this kind of situation?

Well there are several bits of wisdom and lore in our culture we can look upon and think about. First of all, there is the story of Sodom and Gomorra. These two city states in the fertile Crescent were in the final state of corruption, when Lot happened to try and save them. He said to G-d; if there is only one honest man back in the cities, save us. But the other citizens started attacking him!

In this story we see, that there is an ancient understanding of moral fallen cities as places of ultimate sin. So much sin, that even good people cannot survive there.

We see it in the persecution of minority intellectuals who try to enlighten the cities, searching for truth and redemption. If a city or nation is too morally corrupt, it will persecute these lightbringers, not using their understanding and ideas to rejuvenate and heal themselves.

Then there is Plato. In his view, a Republic goes through a phase of growth and deacy. In the end, where decay sets in, the philosophers are supposed to fight the decay and heal the citystate. That is why he wanted a council of philosophers to guard the Republic. This does not work, because who guards the guardians?

But in a situation where there are free philosophers, who are not institutionalized, I believe his idea might just come through. At least this has been my motivation; to try a steer the Republics away from decay and into health.

Plato has a true gem of wisdom in regards to the process of decay, that I have try to use in my work. He says, that what happens is this; In the final hours of the life of the Republic, the people gets so annoyed with the state of things, that they choose the strong man to clean up the mess. In this the tyrant gets to power, and he cleans up the mess, but in the process he gets rid of democracy. We have had a classic example of this in recent times with Hitler. The strong man.

So what do we do to tackle this obvious danger? First of all, it is about making a gliding process, where we clean up the system from within. I have tried to inspire the current leaders and religious heads of state and temple, to get rid of the corruption from within.

The best and most succesful example is the Vatican state, where his excellency pope Francis has been tremendously succesful in this regard. Cleaning up the mess.

If the theory is sound, and it often is with Plato, it will result in a healthy church with all the benefits of this.

In political life, it has been much more difficult. Political processes are often extremely dangerous, but to my luck there is still so much civil feeling and conduct that I have not been killed. Lucky me.

But, as I see it, the political system needs a revolution from within. The corruption, the lying, the dishonest behaviour should be fought from inside.

Some of the characteristics of the strong man should be borrowed by the politicians who are inside the system. Not to overthrow the system, but to clean it up from within.

In this way we keep our democratic system without sacrificing our moral.

It is an extremely difficult process of the politicians, but it truly works, as we have seen it with my work with first mr. Lars Løkke, the former PM of Denmark and also, most probably the coming, mr. Barack Obama, mr. Putin and if we are ok with that, the coming PM of Great Britain.

It is a balance, because at the same time we have all the rebels of the underground who wants to push the agenda in a less corrupt way. So the leading politicians often have to balance a middle leaning politics with a more radical agenda.

This balance is what the UK has to work on if and when mr. Cameron wins the next election.

It is therefor most important to keep the overall aim of the process in perspective. It is not about surrendering to negative warmongering voices, it is about cleaning up Westminster, getting rid of all the corruption and dishonesty. Do little by little, but do it in an honest way.

In this way elections are won.

As a final note in the equation, I would comment on the understanding of how we notherners behave. According to the ancients, idealism is the nourishment of the tree.

To live is to be an idealist, and those who are idealists, are what drives the entire society.

G-d bless our flagging but still living nations.

I think, that the main aim of politics should always be positive. For several reasons. First of all, if it is not positive, why bother? Secondly, if you truly believe that there is such a thing as spirit, would it make sense to follow spirit, if it was not positive?

Therefor; JOY is the aim. But how do we find joy?

If you look at nature, you can see the vicious fight for survival as Darwin, or you can see the exquisite beauty as Plato.

Art is that; a search for beauty, and I believe that there should be a bit of an artist in all of us.

Anaxagoras, the predecessor of Plato had a philosophy that was so real and true, that in it lay a proscription of beauty. He saw in life the touch of G-d. He saw in the universe harmony, and he tried to instill the human race to search for that beauty.

We have had a long time where we tried to understand spirit in the light of Plato, then Aristotle, perhaps now it is time to go for the true master of the three; Anaxagoras. He invented the systems Plato and Aristotle based their thought on. But the beauty of his system is unsurpassed.

I believe, that redemption of the Christian church lies in his works, because it can then level out the playing field with physics.

Find joy and harmony again. Be free as humans.

G-d bless the ability to be free.

I have a feeling, that I am finally getting through to Great Britain, with all my spirit. Listen guys, you know, I have nothing to gain from helping you. When you invited me to Oxford, I paid it myself, putting two months of work in the paper I delivered. After that, I have heard very little, I do not get anything out of it, I sacrifice myself. Right now, I should be working on some of my own projects, and yet I sit here, all engrossed in the English electoral fight. Why? Because, you are family.

We sprout from the same tree, we are one. It is a long time ago, but still the roots are the same.

So, my advice is free, truly free, in fact I paid it myself to get it to you. So there is absolutely no second agenda. I mean, if I tell my closest family or friends I work with the election, they hardly believe it.

So, from the bottom of my heart, with all I have in myself of support and love. GET UP! Believe in yourself, hold your destiny in your own hands. The aim is not to subject the waves, the aim is to survive.

Subjecting the waves is possible if you survive.

And remember this; at the end of the day, it is about who you are close to.

We are close to you, because we are the same family. Support those who you need and love, and you will be redeemed.

G-d bless England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland.

Denmark is the land of fairy tales. Everybody knows the feeling and the ethos, mainly through H.C. Andersen, but also through numerous other fairytales, reproduced by Walt Disney and Barbie. In fact all small girls wish to be a princess and all true little champs wish to be a hero of the realm.

This philosophy comes all the way back from Dan, Skjold, Hamlet, Christian the IV and numerous other kings and queens of Denmark.

So concerning conservative moral fibre, as I see it, it is quite simple. Reach in for that boyhood dream, that vision of you as the cavalier, that dream of you being that prince on the white horse, and be it.

I will give you a relative late example, that has been powerful for us Danes. When we were occupied in the forties by Hitler, the king Christian the X was not so keen on the arrangement. The reason why we were occupied at all, were because we, except for at few die hard intellectuals, had been cowards in the face of the Naziwar machine, and being half German anyway, we thought we could ride it out.

England, the US, and especially Russia did pay for our liberation, we did not, to our shame.

So how did the king tackle this challenge? He rode, everyday, alone on his horse in the streets of Copenhagen. He was a tall regal man, and an avid equistrain.

He did not say anything, just rode, without any protection. It was a silent act of defiance. As time went, it became a happening, people started walking with him, in silence. Just walking, showing, with the king courage, defiance.

This is what leadership is about. Not screaming and yelling, just doing, in and against innumerable odds, what is right. If everybody around you have given up, still you can get up on that horse, and just move. It may be dangerous, it may be haphazard, but as it went, the king saved the honour of Denmark. He stood up, in a time of need.

Now, after the terrorattack on some of my dear friends in Copenhagen, our queen, bless her, is doing the same. In defiance of political correctness, in defiance of terror, in the face of danger, she calls on us, and tells us to be brave. To be united. Thank you so much dear queen, we truly, from the bottom of our tired souls and heart, needed that support.

It is not done in an inhuman or uncivilized way, it is just done with dignity. Supporting the troops, showing kindness to our sacrifice, doing it, not behind barriers or protected, but out in the open.

If she can do it, we can do it.

G-d bless the heart of the queen.

I think a lot of people in the West do not really believe in themselves anymore. It is obvious in the political life, in clerical life, in the day to day workings of man.

It seems to me, that our civilization is old and tired. As in Rome, where Roman virtue was but naught, not long before it fell to our vicious forefathers of the north.

Ill told, ill fought, with a coziness and abandon that represents a dying culture. As a consequence, new more vigorous cultures seek to gain what our ancestors fought for over the last thousand and thousand years.

Look at the churches, some say they are just beautiful shells, we use them at weddings and burials and then not anymore. Look at our values, we sell them for comfort, until there is nothing more to sell. Look at our own self respect, it is so small, even though it makes no sense, when we truly look at our ability to organize, think, construct and invent.

I read this beautiful little book, it is about the second world war, and it represents it from the perspective of two children, one is a German boy, the other is a blind French girl. What really strikes me, is the strength of the Nazi ideology. It is so fierce and maniac in a way. Without any doubt, just a juggernaut of force.

When I met my first resistant fighter of the Second world war; Max, through my historical studies, he told me, that Nazism was extremely strong. So it makes sense.

My family of Jews fought the Nazies, and I have no illusions on the negative impact of Nazism. I however also see, that turning away from Nazism, also made us extremely weak. It fire branded and stigmatized elements in our society that we otherwise loved, like our northern mythology. It kind of monopolized the northern mythology.

To me, this is ridiculous, I mean, these are our roots, and just because they were abused, it does not mean they should not be valid. It is a matter of how you use it. For good or bad.

My basic point is; we have to be strong again. Not in a negative and Jewhating way, but in a positive way. We have to shed our guilt from the second world war, and regain the faith in our own culture.

The mark of Cain will always be that of Jew hatred. The mark of bliss will always be that of Jew love. I love Jews, from the bottom of my heart. I adore Moses, David, Ben Gurion, though he had his faults. I love Benyamin Netanyahy for his fight. I love my little daughter so much, that I gave her a Jewish name; Rakel.

With this, I hope that we can rise again in the West. With faith in ourselves, and on the side of good.

G-d bless us all.

It seems to me, that somehow my metaphysical and economic theories might blend in the case of UK politics. On one hand, I have tried to remake Adam Smith in a more balanced way, and at the other hand, I have tried to make a comeback for the Christian Churches and specifically the Anglican as well as the Catholic Church.

My point in the economic discourse, was the lack of conscience in relation to business, and metaphysically my main point have been, that G-d is truly alive.

In the case of his excellency archbishop Welby, the businessfocus has been “radical”, as in absolutely ethical, as I understand it. And in relation to Adam Smith, radicalism could be interpreted as a comeback to the understanding of business as a Conservative plight, where country, queen and flag is supported.

I have a friends within the Danish business community, among them the leader of the oil department of Mærsk. Quite an international business, with a gross production output in the billions. So it has a lot of people working, and it is as conservative as you can get it.

I was, to be proud of, read by the late mr. Mærsk, who was an old sailor, and a captain.

When I met my friend, I remember meeting him in this international headquarter, served by a german secratarie, business was done in mostly English, and I suppose I wondered why he wanted to be my friend.

I realized it a bit into the meeting. I told him about my ideas of a conservative reneassance of the importance of keeping virtues and values. All of a sudden, he almost jumped at me and he said, or rather shouted at me; We still flag with Dannebrog (the Danish flag). It kind of startled me, but the fire in his eyes was a contrast to all the international business around me.

That was why he wanted to be friend with a philosopher, who, by all means, was a leper in the eyes of everybody else, still is.

He was still loyal to the flag. The old flag, that came down to Denmark a thousand years ago.

So, we truly understood each other, and that is a story that both clerical as well as business should perhaps remember. Where they truly meet, is under that banner of the nation.

It might be totally out of fashion, alt modish and anti EU, but it still there, and people still believe.

On these vestiges of pride, should a new dawn be built.

G-d bless England.

When Galileo realized, that the sun did not turn around the earth, but it was the other way around, most people wanted to put him to the cross, and purge him from society. But after the time really understood him, he was commended as one of the greatest philosophers and scientists of the world.

My point is; something that seems strange and alien in the time may actually be right and will propel the human world further, after it is understood and accepted. It is because, human beings really do not like to have their world view challenged, they rebel if someone does that.

Take this realization I have just had with political science; that geometry lies at the heart of it. You can see it most prominently in Plato, who fathered the Republic. His idea was that societies start with a king, goes on wit an aristocracy and ends up in a democratic control. Hence the president (king), senate (aristocracy) and lower house (people). A triangle.

But in the works of Democritus, the father of progressive tax, you also see a lot of geometrical work.

These are some of the basic building blocs of what we today see as our advanced civilization. We just forget to use it when we create new systems.

Take Marxism. It is an international system based on Sparta, that was initiated as a very closed system. Because Lycurgus (the founding philosopher of Sparta) knew that his system had to be closed. So we have a system that was doomed to fail from the beginning. Russia is just now picking up the pieces.

Or the works of Adam Smith. He himself was aware of the balances of his ideas. You need freedom to be countered with rules and regulations. This is an equation. But we used only the freedom part, and forgot about the ethical part, giving us capitalism swallowing up man and humanity. It was not until I proscribed a cure, that would remake this balance that things seem to get into balance again.

Still I am trying to scream at the top of my lungs to make England take that proscription, and she falters to do it. Perhaps lacking the moral fibre. You have to be what you are in politics to be succesful. Conservatives are guardians of moral and ethics, and we we need conservatives to do their duty. Otherwise will the balance not work.

This is where Oxford comes into play. You are the lock, I am the key. Yes, you may be a little wary of the potential and the grand scope of my ideas, but truly, is it not always so with a renaissance, with new ideas? It will create Change.

I think we are entering a new age of enlightenment. In the 20´th century, due to the centralized way media worked, manipulation and hence the mediocre were the ruling party.

You can see it with the EU today. Is this the epitome of civilization? Not at all, and they are very much 20´th century created. Trying to manipulate and not elevate.

With the freedom of communication, it will again be merit that rules. Because, if there is a great market of ideas available at your fingertips, you would want to be guided or use the best. Why would you use the second best? You would not.

So, it will not be the person with the most direct acces to wealth, power or contacts that will propel the system forward, it will be the most competent and prolific. The best blogger or bloggers.

In this small window of opportunity, humanity has a chance. You never know when the window closes again, or the system somehow corrupts. I mean power has realized that comments on blogs are to be influenced. They have control over the blogging, to some extent, by sucking bloggers up in the mainstream newspapers. But they still have not all the power, and I am, as one of many, free.

The meritocratic system works, to the benefit of man.

G-d bless the freedom of the internet.

Our planet is a mess, our societies are a mess, our future and past are a mess. This is because we do not care about balance and harmony. We only care about the immediate threat or problem to solve, so we loose sight of the larger picture, and often get ensnared in more and more complicated and unharmonious frames of existence.

Today our societies are a mix of Aristotelian/Platonic democracy on one side, and marxist international spartanism on the other side. Add to this the different religions and economic systems, and you see the patchwork is a work of different strands of ideas without any conscious effort to harmonize the different parts.

So we have chaos and lack of humanity as a result. You see it everywhere, crime is more rampant, the families are suffering, we get less children, we suffer from lack of faith in our own systems. Because we simply cannot understand all its parts, but we can see that something is wrong, and that it does not work.

To add to this mess, the philosophers who have influenced our political architecture in modern times lack the most basic understanding of what they are building on, so they make bad choices. Not to mention the followers of the different strands of philosophy know even less, so that makes it even more difficult to make any sense out of it all.

Then, as a consequence, people tend to fall for the simple answers, and find a solace in primitive systems, that gives them an easy fix, and peace of mind here and now.

They all miss the basic point; there is only one cure, and that is to fix the architecture of society, make new balances, suppress some elements of development, strengthen other, to make a new and more harmonious house.

But, then again, if you make a new house, you need to fit it into the surroundings. You cannot just start all over, as the futurists thought. You have to know the old, and fit it into that. So architecture of society should be individualized, as in Egypt, Israel, the US, UK, Denmark, France, Russia. Each nation is unique, and need unique solutions.

There is one thing we therefor need to remember, when we build our new political buildings; the ideas were created with one special aim in mind; geometrical harmony. That was how the ancients thought. They new, and harmony is a matter of finding the right balances in the house. You cannot have a heavy beam without a strong pillar. And you need a strong base under the different pillars of the house. To make it harmonious, you need to see the beauty in the geometrical forms; the triangle of power, the equality in racematters, the pyramid of society, with the family as the base.

These thoughts of harmony is what creates a happy and content society. The more advanced, the better.

G-d bless the architecture of society, and may it be healed and whole again.

There is a lot of talk about a renaissance of England, and how this is tied to a ”Thatcherite” way of thinking about conservatism. How ms. Margaret Thatcher was driven by a want to do a bidding in her life. How she had problems alleviating the Smithsonian want for free markets and Hayek’s ideas of minimal state, with a want to serve G-d.

Well, the point is, as I see it; she wanted to serve G-d. How you do it will represent a challenge to all who are Christian Muslim or Jew, but that you should do it, should never be challenged, at least not if you want to see yourself as a conservative.

My angle has been a little different than that of Hayek and the other Chicago conservatives. I have stood my ground, time and again, when I thought that something was wrong. Not more, nor less. I did it, when the dot com boom faded and lives and destinies of men were caught up in its wake. I cried for justice and honor in the face of a live stealing capitalism that did not see the man in all the wreckage it did. Leading to my first book; The Good Leader, that was a wrap up of Aristotle’s Ethics, fused into modern business.

Then when I discovered that young girls in my community was raped and misused. I stood up again and cried for justice and repercussion.

Both times I payed with ridicule and antagonism. The first time I fell sick for ten years, the second time I was persecuted for another ten years, leaving me to almost falter a second time. By I stood tall, because IT WAS NOT RIGHT!

After a while I realized that there were several anchors to this way of seeing things. Adam Smith talks about freedom of goods, but at the same time he talks about the moral sentiment. A feeling for what is right and wrong, an inner compass, something divine inside each of us, that we as men can refer to. That is, in essense conservatism. To reach in to that inner sanctum of soul, reaching in, and finding that rigid stick, that burning flame, that strength of religion. That, feeling that there is something that is right, and there is something that is wrong, and with the knowledge of the cost, stand on side of good.

Jesus does it as well, Martin Luther as well, all the great protestant philosophers and church men had one mark that put them as the epigone of their time; they stood tall in the face of evil, of corruption, of the little seduction, of that we call ”easy living”. Being a conservative is not easy living, it is hard living. Fighting for something, crawling into that mount Moriah, to put the ring in the depths of fire. It may cost you your life, your money. Sometimes your future and your security, your friends or family. But at the end of time, you have served the greatest thing in life. You served your own conscience, and with that, the spark of G-d within you.

G-d bless England, and may she rise again.

We are discussing the consequences of the deal with Iran. Will it be usable, will it work, will it make the Middle East a better place.

Well, the main guarantee is now mr. Barack Obama. He will, as long as he is president of the United States, back it up.

But after he is not the president anymore, what then, will the deal still bind?

Well, who knows. We can only guess. But one thing is clear. I will there backing it, and that is almost as powerful, as things are right now.

I believe in it, and I hope that the legacy of mr. Obama will be one of turning the world around and making it more peaceful.

Can we trust mr. Obama? Well, he has grown, and is now a fully grown, mature, internationally leading statesman, with a lot of experience. Is that a man to trust? I mean, who would you not trust, if you cannot trust a man of that stature?

He is what he is, and he says what he means.

G-d bless you all.

The current archbishop of Cantebury, his excellency Welby is a radicalist. At least this is his own words. In his opinion, radicalism is at the heart of what it is to be Christian.

I have pondered a bit about it, and actually I must say that I agree. To be Christian is to be radical.

Why?

Well, when Jesus Christ was condemned to the cross, he did it because he was radical! The exact occasion was a sunday when he was, by the pharisees, told not to heal a person, because at that day it is not allowed.

Being a radical, he refused to obey, and went along healing anyway.

In the monastery that Jesus Christ is supposedly a student, the monastic order of the Essenes, they do not seem that benign either. The story about the warriors of light against the sons of darkness. Bright young men standing there with the emblazoned and gilded weapons waiting for the cry of the horn of Michael. That is not a benign story, but a radical story.

But if we look a little deeper into the matter, we see, again and again, that the matter where Jesus Christ took a stand, was ethical matters in opposition to orthodoxy. So it is not just being radical because of that, it is because radicalism leads to a better and more just world.

Perhaps this can be to some use in the campaigning for England; make it a just cause.

I think a lot of my projects, and ideas that I have tried to sponsor are somehow running together in the UK election. The passion for an ethical business, that has led to a rise in production output. The passion for a redeemed Christian church. The fight against the sinners of the caliphatists.

These are all ideas intertwined. But not understood could lead to devastating consequence. I do not believe in a crusade. I believe in a democratic consequence against Islam.

These two things are difficult to keep apart.

But if we do not, we risk ending up in a religious fight, and I will not sponsor that.

I believe in the cooperation between the leading monotheistic religions, and I believe the supremacy of democracy over caliphatism.

G-d bless you all.

Getting to know Britain or England as we say here in Denmark has been a long road for me. I started quite early in my young adulthood reading a lot of English ”trash” litterature as Stephen King and more serious litterature as C.S. Lewis and Tolkien. At that time, at had precious little knowledge of the difference between Denmark and England, and just relished the good books, and the old stories, the yarns and the prolific ideas.

At university I stubled upon Joseph Conrad, and that was really a revelation for me. I probably did not really take it in as everybody else. For me it was the sailing that really hit me. I am an avid sailor myself, having a 23 footer sailboat, having criss crossed the Kattegat and Øresund. But, it really fired up my imagination with all the old sailing yarns, the stoic captains and the old seadogs of wisdom. We have a bit of it here in Denmark as well, with, still, a lot of sailing culture and boats everywhere.

Then I stumbled upon Ivanhoe, then Mark Twain, then, then, then. So many authors, I cannot remember just half of them.

In Denmark, we have this philosophical tradition, that I am the latest, or one of the latest representatives of. It is called Grundtivigianism, and basically it is a tradition that goes all the way back to Saxo, and even further back to Hamlet, and further even. It is as old as there is Denmark. The latest and greatest; Grundtvig was a prolific prosemite and mixed Nordic Folkmyths with Christianity and liberalism. It sounds pretty strange coming from outside, but in fact it is just strange, because it is so advanced.

This philosophy has been unknown to the rest of the world untill I, by chance, started exporting it to all who really wanted to have it. The strength of it lent to all who wish to have it. And look at the result; blossom and spring so many places in the world.

And you have basically scratched the surface!

I truly hope, that the rest of the English speaking world, and many other who are descendants of the Danes will live and prosper by these ideas. Why? Because they are your roots.

You basically just forgot them when you went off sailing, but we kept them here at the outspring of the emigrations. And here they are still, just in an immensely advanced stage.

It still evolves here in Denmark, new writers add to the tradition as time goes. There is just a new one who has popped up recently, a young Phd. named Christian Nord. He has a pen of the angles.

Grundtvig used to talk about history being the craft of minstrels and singers. Because the myths were the glue that binded the folk together.

So he sang to us, making, litteraly, hundreds of songs and psalms.

This bardic tradition, mixed up with an acute academic pursuit is relevant today I think. Because people around the world are sick and tired of the barren academic production. They want something they can refer to. They want the Hamlets and the Bilbos to sing to them. Not just powder dry, but the living and the exiting.

This song, it what keeps us alive, what awakens us again, what makes us remember who we are.

G-d bless the fair isles of England, and may it remember itself.

To understand the seismic shifts in the British electorate, that brought us first EDL, and then UKIP and Britain First, you need to understand the needs of the people.

British values have been suppressed and trampled upon for two generations now. It started in the seventies, or rather it started with the 68 ths, and have continued ever since. A watered down socialist utopian thinking have been the ruling dictum of most of European society, with all what it brings with it of decay and misunderstanding. Do not get me wrong, I have nothing against dancers, being male or female (having danced the last 25 years), but I have something against a thorough liberal conspiracy blaming all who stand up for their country as bigots and racists. This is not right, it is too much. The balance has tilted.

This is what the electorate is so damn (sorry), tired off. They have realized, that the freewheeling days are over, and they want some solidity and ground under their feet again.

But they do not want some extremist agenda. They want it to be civilized. So scaling back the liberal ideas, is what they want. That is why they vote conservative. UKIP kind of puts this in a few bullit points. No more immigration, out of the EU and so on. Clear, decisive plans, they want to make, and it is a remedy for the excesses of the liberals.

But the British electorate are not stupid either, they judge the politicians on the qualities of their ideas. A few headlines is not enough for the culture that fostered an empire as large as it has, and has been leading in philosophy for the last two thousand years, if not more, if you count the gallic settlements as intellectually leading.

Anyway. Ideas for Change or for a change of course, should be at one hand, based on serious philosophy, and at the other hand, be seriously, and practically implementable.

There is a trend within Socialist strategy that has hit first Norway, then Denmark, and seems to be hitting the UK now. Basically the liberal politicians do not say anything about what they really want to do when they actually get to power, apart from vague hints on it. The electorate more or less fall asleep, and do not question what the liberals actually want to do. So they get the power, almost by accident, and AFTER that. They seriously abuse their power, doing a lot of amateurish and honestly unethical politicking. In Denmark, we have had almost four years of nightmarish politicking. The teachers were totally mistreated, a large chunk of the social welthfare was cut away, and so on. Haphazard and dishonest from the beginning.

Now, when the election is coming up, liberals start copying the agenda of the DFP, the equivalent to UKIP, in the hope, that they will win.

The Danish electorate is disgusted with the show, and disregard for the political elite takes new leaps infrequently. Honesty and respect for the rules and regulations, are crumbling virtues in a corrupt Parliament. Something we are not used to here in Denmark.

The late prime minister, mr. Anders Fogh, had a cure for that. That might be of some use to the current politicians in the UK. He made some deals, and agreements with the people, and then he simply stuck to it. He called it ”social contract”. This could be an antidote to some the ire and disgust people have with modern politicians, with all respect for the work we obviously do.

Anyway, make a punch, as Angus Young from AC/DC says. You have to make a good punch. Follow it up with some extra jabs and perhaps end it all up with a blow to the chin.

If the liberals are trying not to get into the open, force them. Challenge them, ask them openly what they are going to do with EU, the relationship to the US, to Muslim hatepreachers and so on. We have seen how the Liberals here in Denmark promised, at the election to do something about it. But when they got the job, the first thing they did, was inviting a hatepreacher from Pakistan at the 9/11. Talk about lack of respect for the US.

There should be enough to attack, and as long as we actually do as we say, we could give them a potential knockout. We just have to press our case, get the initiative, and get the ball on the part of the field that is not ours. Attack, not internally in the conservative block, but jabs, feints, make it even a haywire, full contact, blow to the jaw.

Just remember, make it deep. The answers we deliver, should be based on philosophy, thought through and honest.

G-d bless a clean but decisive electorate fight.

Being a fan of mr. Churchill, one would naturally ask oneself, what would he have done in the Middle East today? After all, he supported Lawrence of Arabia, who was one of the founding fathers of Israel, and a staunch supporter of both the arabs and the first zionists.

This seemingly inconsequential point of view could only be supported by someone as Lawrence of Arabia, because he truly understood the Middle East, not like most modern meddlers in the Middle East, who do not truly understand the vast ideas created and spurned in the Middle East, the dynamic, the history and the potential.

Yesterday, I was ablaze with joy for the deal with Iran. Why? Because, to me, as it may have been for mr. Lawrence, he and I see the historic significance of the deal, and how, deep beneath all the posturing and swagger of the Middle Easterners, there is the true perspective of religion in a deep and cognitive sense. Not just another part of X factor, or some stupid conspiracy of some modern equivalent to Hannibal the Cannibal gone crazy in the streets of Mosul.

No, he would recognize the teutonic shifting of the plates of the Middle East, some of the most ardent supporters of spirit, and see, that finally the glow, the light and the bright beam of spirit is again showing itself in the Middle East. Old cogs not used in millennia, are slowly turning again. Doors as old as Abraham and David are opening in a recognition that G-d is again alive, and he is here.

This is the feeling he would have had.

Now, I might be wrong, but what if I am right? What if G-d is again roaming the streets of the old capitals in the Middle East. Seeking redemption in the eyes of the believers?

What if there is a chance for peace, and for man to learn to be in unison with spirit again? What if this is the chance for Israel to realize its Kabalistic providence, and have a go on forging an alliance with all three monotheistic religions, thereby creating a platform for everybody to stand on, if and when man again will search for destruction.

What if this was his feeling and hope, and consequently the motivation behind the deal.

Then all the petty arguments, all the smallish material fears would vaporize, and peace would descend on man.

The Persians believe in good deeds, good actions and good thoughts. Look what happens, when they do that; they prosper, and get richer and further into the respect of man.

Why? Because this is how G-d would wish it to be.

G-d bless you all.

So we are nearing the election in the UK. The UK is much more than just the Hebrides, the southern cliffs and the extreme north where they are, honestly, still adherents of Thor and Odin.

It is a complex, advanced, intelligent, worldspanning system, that has conquered the globe, but is reeling from the backlash of the loss of the empire.

This has to stop. My best advice is; be realistic. The UK is still, apart from the ties it holds to Australia and New Zealand, the most powerful, by far, country in Europe. It has a gross domestic output that even rivals countries several times bigger than the UK. It has some of the finest universities in the world. It is still immensely ambitious and has a lot of appetite on the world.

It is still world class, and it should be judged by that meter as everybody else.

There is still the value of freedom, that propels it to rule the wave. Why? Because ruling the wave will give England liberty. Why is that important? Because freedom will give you happiness. The feeling of being unbound by anything, the vast horizon meeting your eye in the morning. The cavaliers of the sea, still roaming, still strong, still ready for a fight.

This is the UK, not what some people seek to instill in the hapless British. This is might and pride of being English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish.

Pride can be vainglorious and instill a false feeling of self worth. But too little pride, can also be harmful.

The UK has to look at itself, and be proud. Not because of evil deeds done, or tyrannical stranglehold on some. But because there is so much to be proud of! All the little inventions, the marvelous literature, the high, high level of civilization. Too little is also a sin.

So be proud of what you are, do not bow your head in the face of danger, fight! As you have always done when the chips were not in your favor, just because, what you have created around the world, is respected and cherished. Look at all your former colonies. Do they shift out your system? No, as when Rome ruled, the former colonies cherished the influence and ideas it had brought to them. Same with the UK.

See that, and be proud again, of what you are, of what you have contributed to the civilization of the world.

Forget about all the naysayers and the belittlers, the broken and cowards. Be proud of what you are, because you have, as much as anyone, and especially because you are you; the right to be so.

G-d bless you all.

I think all the talk about British values misses one singular point, that really makes the discussion what it is; stories, or values embedded in what we used to be.

Conservatism is that; going back to what we were, to find out what we are today.

In Great Britain, there are several sources to what Great Britain is now; the Roman histories as Camelot and the knights around the round table, the viking stories of marauders pillaging the countryside, being the best warriors of their time, of our time in fact, the gallic stories of romance and Scots of the highlands.

What does these stories have in common, and how may we say that we can find values in these stories?

There is a continuum as I see it; the beginning of the Romans, the consecutive fights in the 500´dreds, the fights with the vikings and then the expansion of the Empire. The idea, that there is a balance between on one side justice, and the other side freedom, consecrated in the Magna Carta. Where we at one side have justice as the ruling principle of common law, and freedom as the ruling principle in the democratic assembly. Throw in the values of equality professed at the round table of the knights. There you have it; freedom, justice and equality.

But we need to focus on the values that are really threatened today. Is it romance, freedom, justice or equality? Well, the justice system is threatened by competing courts called sharia courts. But truly this is only a nuisance, not a real threat. Romance and equality is not threatened much, perhaps romance because of the freewheeling ideas of the young. But after all, England will always be a land of romance. Then we end up at the most threatened value, the value of freedom.

This value is truly threatened. Not just a little, a lot. Threatened by an alien system in the EU, who have no idea about the free thought of the free man. Threatened by islamic extremists, who dream about giving us the deathkiss of the caliphate.

Freedom is threatened, and that is exactly why UKIP is a succes. UK Independent. The overall message the constituency thought to convey to the political establishment by voting UKIP, is the fact that the freedom of the fair isles of England is under threat.

This is not just an accidental value, it is the value of the viking ancestors of the British. This is why we in Denmark shine on the international scene; we invented the value and the consecutive system that was made with it; the Thinge and the Freestate.

So to fight for British values in a situation where everything is at stake, you need to realize that freedom is not just another thing we can live without. It is the very lifeblood of what it is to be British. The true value that Britain has spread to the world, through democracy.

Something to stand up for, something to fight for, something that if not tended to, is lost.

So, look into yourself, find your strength, you are as much vikings inside as we are here in Denmark, and honestly as the old berserkers stood their stand where they put up shop, so should England, so should Britain, NEVER SURRENDER!

G-d bless England.

Making a pitch against IS in Great Britain has to be seen in a broader light, and has to be viewed morally.

The fight against IS, that the American led coalition is fighting in and around Iraq is not only a problem in Syria and Iraq, it is, obviously also a problem in Europe at large, and specifically in the UK.

We have seen it quite obviously with the flow of muslims from the UK to the area of fighting in the Middle East. It is not ok, and i poses a major problem for the security in Europe.

The knowledge and the potential the skill the islamists bring back to Europe is extremely dangerous.

We need to realize this, and act accordingly.

But, it is also a political process, if we cannot name our enemy, he will be pretty difficult to fight.

In the election coming up in may in the UK. As I have proposed a strategy focusing on the fight against IS, both internationally and domestically could be a winning issue, that might just win the electorates to put mr. Cameron in Downing street 10.

But it has to de done very carefully, and with an eye on the potential attacks by the PC, the political correct.

First of all, here in Denmark, I am being accused of being the ultimately politically correct. I have pondered a great deal on this, in fact I see myself as an enlightener and a wielder of truth. This is not, supposedly, politically correct. But, since I am both a Muslim, a Jew and a Christian in a strange way, this adds to the eclectic span of the ideas I try to promote.

Anyway, as I see it, persons as T.S. Lawrence and his deep knowledge of the Middle East are truly the persons we should turn to in this discussion, as mr. Churchill did in fact. In other words, deep, true knowledge of the Middle East should be our guide. Not just our own immediate fears.

This leads us to the conclusion, that there are good and bad muslims, honest and dishonest muslim, and what we need to look at is the moral content of the muslim organisations we are fighting.

This is in fact a very PC way of looking at things, because the moral content is always what PC are looking at, trying to be the most aloof.

Anyway, I am not proposing a PC way of looking at the conflict we have with muslims, I just conclude, that if we look at things morally and ethically, we often never have problems with the new socialists. They actually agree!

Therefor, focusing on the ethical behaviour of IS; the slaughtering, the killing of innocents, the persecution of minorities, while as accepting the plethora of ideologies in the Middle East as something to look at individually, might just get the Conservatives an edge in the election.

In other words, instead of holding all muslims accountant for the atrocities done in Iraq, hold only IS accountable, and start working along with Egypt, Saudiarabia and Iran, as it seems fit in the great game of international politics.

This leaves the discussion; what do we actually do with the Islamists in the UK? This again is a moral discussion. We cannot just put them all in jail. But we can look at their affiliation with the democratic system we have.

If they want a caliphate, why don’t they just go to a place where they can have such an “elevated system”?

Go square in on the democratic values and system that was actually very much invented in the UK with the Magna Carta.

In this way you tout the traditional English values, and at the same time make a political front against an inhuman enemy.

There will be discussions further along the road, such as; what do we do with the silent majority? And what about ethnic Englishmen converting to islamism and so on. But these difficult discussion will have to wait, hopefully.

My experience from the campaigning I did for mr. Obama, the timing is very important. When I beat Romney, he was difficult, because he started copying my ideas. So make a thrust, quickly and decisively. If you get some momentum, use it to build up more. I will try to follow the discussion from Denmark, and help you the best I can.

But, with the tools here, you should be able to make great inroads. What is all important then is momentum. Press on if have the initiatives, never rest, just press on your advantage if you have your opponent on his heels.

G-d bless the fair isles of England.

To quote the old but still kicking British band AC/DC; it is rock or bust in England. If the Social democrats are elected, I sincerely believe it is all over. The country is still working, but it is only surviving barely. The long demise after the colonies were lost or started working for themselves, has all but strangled England.

This is where it is extremely important to remember that England and Great Britain is so much more than the empire. It is England. A nation of culture with roots older than most really realize. So I would not despair, if England remembers its roots, it will survive, otherwise it may wither.

But there is also an election coming up, and, though I see myself as liberal in some areas, I still support mr. Cameron, he needs to win, to give England a chance to survive, and with that all the Anglo speaking world. It is Rock or Bust. Not a time for the fainthearted, but a time for those with the warriors within, for the heroes of yon reliving their time here now. For the Marlboroughs and Churchills to get on up, and enter the fray. It is now or never.

There are three areas I would point to, that could sway the electorate in the direction of mr. Cameron.

First of all, a traditional area of conservative politics; security.

Islamists are going rampant in a wide area around especially central and southern England. A direct policy towards this issue is the possible key to Downing street nr. 10.

People are scared, and they will vote for the person that may give them security.

To tackle this area, you however enter a hornets nest. The Socialists have on this area put up the big guns, and are gunning for all those who criticize Muslims as racists.

This is ridiculous, but politics is not about rationality always, but often just projects that seem possible, often disregarding the cost.

This gordic knot can be solved however by a simple trick, or rather a political stance that will ensure that all the possible attacks of possible racist accusations can be avoided, or are difficult to use.

Stand on a democratic platform and criticize Islam from there. Do not critizise all Muslims, just Muslims who do not respect the basic political system. That is the rule of law and the democratic assembly. They are what are called, islamists and have a huge franchise in Syria/Iraq (ISIS). They are hated by most serious people, but supported by a huge number of muslims in the UK. We have seen it by the executioner of severeal innocent Europeans who spoke with a british accent.

So they have a presence in the UK. Make that a political, vocal point, the main point of your election campaign, and you will have a good chance of winning with a serious margin. What will you do to them? Repatriate them.

Secondly, you need to touch on the traditional conservative voters. They feel a bit lost, but have had a reawakening, especially with the English philosopher Roger Scruton. In a world with a lot of insecurity, traditional values are save havens. Not to mention, that the Anglican church needs support as well.

But family values, country, flag and solidarity with the poor is a path that will give you added support. Why? Because you need to support those in need, and the Anglican Church is in need. I know there has been some controversy lately, but never mind, it seems to be ok by now.

Thirdly, there is the economy. Here you already shown good progress, despite all the problems in Europe. So tout your wins, and explain how it was done.

This is a fairly conservative/conservative set of ideas, but this is what people want, as seen in the EU election. They want more England, less globalization.

In a crisis situation that England and the rest of the UK is living through now, normally the electorate will look for the strong man. This is the background for all the new conservative hardcore groupings. Some I have had the possibility to back. But I sincerely believe, that the democratic system should solve problems not the strong man who will supplant the democratic system. A result that is most often seen in a situation as what you are living through now.

How do you tackle that threat? By being that strong man yourself. Do not back down from confrontation, but stand on the deck of the ship as a lord Nelson.

If you do this, there is a very good chance you will win, according to my experience as a strategist over many elections, among it the latest of mr. Obamas.

G-d bless England and the UK.

The idea of the family is slowly gaining speed, both politically as well as metaphysically. We are now entering the phase where we discuss the practical implementation of all the different ideas of how to strengthen a family.

There is one tool, that we can use, and is a tool often used by religion, and a tool we know works good; ethics.

Today people talk about the food, they talk about their jobs, they talk about mindfullness and meditation. At the same time, they scream and yell at each other. They do not think about anybody but themselves.

This is where ethics comes in. Because ethics is really ideas of change. Ideas of how to make a better world, working tirelessly for improving that community.

Take the value of solidarity. Solidarity is in direct contrast to selfishness. It is about sharing those difficulties as a family, sacrifising yourself for your children. Caring those babies in the middle of the night, even though you feel so endlessly tired. Nor giving up on your wife, even though she is ridicously, absurdly demanding and tired herself. Catching your child when she falls, sucking it up sometimes when things are just a mess.

That is difficult, but this is truly the demand of a father.

Then freedom. Sometimes you need to be free, your wife needs to be free, your children needs to go without your endless supervision. Sometimes your wife just needs a night off with the girls, or you really need to call your buddies and hang out in front of a superbowlgame. This is your freedom, and we need that as well. Giving each other that freedom is very important.

The ethical demands on a parent, on a child on a sibling, nephew and so on are often not discussed or taken into consideration. But this is truly where you can make change in each persons life, and in the life of the family.

Forgiving, being one of the most important values, because you need that, to stick together.

G-d bless the family.

When you prophesize something, often the prophesy seems weird in the situation. I promised mr. Netanyahu, that he would be a hero if he did not launch the final tank offensive in Gaza. In fact it seemed wrong after all the problems Likud got after the war. The right and the conservatives were scolding him, and he had to, as a consequence ask the people of his war-conduct was all right.

It really kind of made me sad, I hate to be wrong. But after the election, it seems to me, that I was not wrong after all. I mean, the reason why the election was initiated was because he got a bad reception of how he worked on the last Gaza war. But obviously mr. Netanyahu did get it right, at least if you ask the voters.

Heroism is not about how politicians view other politicians, it is how voters and people look upon their leaders. So I suppose the voters have Netanyahu as a hero.

I realize it is also a strong backing to a very critical stance towards Iran, so in this I am not a part, it is the loyalty of the Israeli people towards their leader on this issue that they show. I mean, we are not supposed to loose Israel, and we need it to be strong, and we need to unite and be healed after all the controverses after the last Gaza war.

The people have spoken, they have given a green light to both the actions in Gaza, and the tough stance against Iran. We need to respect mr. Netanyahu for his leadership in this, and give him the credit.

I still hope for a peaceful solution in the negotiations with Iran, but I must say, that I at the same time, recognize mr. Netanyahu for what he is; a hero, a Messiah for his people.

G-d bless mr. Netanyahu.

Now the last few stones in the great monument of mr. Barack Obamas tenure are being laid. Will he get the green light from mr. Netanyahu in the negotiations with Iran? Will the community philosophy really take roots? Will the economy keep on working as it has?

Some of these answers will be answered in the future. But there is no doubt, that he has brought Change. Take Tunisia, take the economy so far, take Egypt.

Together Barack and I have really made a huge impact, and I truly hope we will see it for what it is; a new philosophy based on the old. Marx came from Hegel, I come from Marx. The rebellion Marx did towards Hegel, I have done to Marx. Working on the weak spots, and finding new answers. As in making liberal theory metaphysical again, and shedding the material basis for an ethical and spiritual basis. As giving a new chance to the family.

Add to this the focus on democracy and humanism, you have a brand new political/metaphysical paradigm, that has had, already a huge push on the world.

Will we satisfy the promises of Change and Hope. Well, we will see. But one thing is certain, we have already come a long way.

I hope these frontier ideas will end up as human lore one day, so that our grandchildren will read about us in books and perhaps look at a worn old statue with our names on.

They will perhaps just see an old figure, but we know, that we stood tall in a critical situation for Queen and country, for democray and freedom.

G-d bless our freedom

We are in a dead end theoretically both in metaphysical as well as in socialist terms. The ideas in the socialist camp are often barren and very, very far from the outset.

The outset is Karl Marx and his international version of Sparta. That is focus on the mass, the military aspects of the society, the secret police and solidarity.

This he saw as a workers issue, and propelled socialists to work for an international solidarity movement.

This is not the way, as I see it. As Plato was criticized by Aristotle, I believe that Aristotles arguments are true (Plato was also very inspired by Sparta). His arguments are; an utopian society too far removed from the needs of people will not work, and consequently fall apart. As we have seen in all places where socialism has ruled, it has fallen apart everywhere.

There are several issues, as I see it, that should be adressed. First of all, there is the issue with the family. According to Marx, family is not a good institution (he was here inspired by Sparta). This is a false premise I think. As Aristotle I believe, that family is a prerequisite for at society. Family is the basic building stone. If this is changed in a socialist society, much will be better. In fact, I would, if I were a modern socialist, work for family in respect of security, economical underpinning, and support in terms of school and daycare. It would make it much more easy for many families who are often hardpressed, especially when the kids are young.

Then there is the metaphysical problem of the socialist inspired welthfarestate. Today mostly psychology makes the theoretical underpinning under school and daycare work. I like psychology, and am a fan of Jung, but as Jung and Freud are very deep, they are still not as deep as Jesus Christ or Moses. My point is, that a metaphysical underpinning or just discussion about the school and social system at large, would lift the whole area a lot. I mean, why do I work my day off as a helper of a handicapped child? Because I believe that the creator gave me an incitement to change things in a positive way. My philosophy behind my work makes my job full of meaning.

These two changes in a socialist thinking could make way for a renewed charge by the church, here I specifically think about the Anglican church into mainstream society.

By insisting that the values and the ideas of clergymen is of a value, not only in marriages and in death, but also as a theoretical underpinning under schoolwork, and other kinds of social and educationary work.

Talking about the Anglican church. I believe, that we have stopped the moral discussion on politics before it went too wild. Thank you for that, we are now ready to start again. First of all; challenges of a metaphysical nature is not about fighting someone, but about fighting for something. G-d wishes us to lift humankind, so they are closer to him. This is done by going out and finding those in need of healing and support. It may be the lonely elderly, the man in the gutter, the prisoner, the sickly child.

G-d wishes us to help them, and in this process help everybody around them, to have a better life.

But this work is difficult, because we have to get out of our comfortzone, and risk ourselves in the meeting with world. Be naked in the meeting with people we do not know, and may hurt us, by rejecting us, or trying to abuse our kindness.

But this is what G-d wants for us, because only if we do good deeds and think good thoughts, will we lift his children here on earth.

So instead of staying in our churches, we should lift the gate open, and start going out on the street to risk ourselves and save the souls of those who are lost.

Bring them back to G-d, to kindness and care.

G-d bless the will to listen to G-d in his arms of mercy.

We are coming to an end in the discussion and negotiation on the Iran deal. Everybody have something at stake. And the future implications are vast.

I dreamed about ending the cold war, and starting a new era of peace and enlightenment. Unfortunately, the conflicts in and around Ukraine put an end to this. But somehow, to my luck and general surprise, we still see a good development in the negotiations between European nations, the US, Iran, Israel and other players.

In a way, it is revealing about the true power of the world. We have the European Union, talk about Bric countries and so on. But at the end of the day, it is the West and East, that is descendants of the Danes and Swedes that decide the outcome of the negotiations. Strange, but there it is; we feel comfortable about each other, and go a long way to find a compromise. To the good of humanity.

Iran is pretty stuck in all the infights of the family of the Europeans, and I truly understand, that it is annoying, but rest assured, that I will, as the caretaker of the tree of the Danes; Asgr, the guardian of the lore of Vikings, will try and help. You deserve it, by listening and caring.

Things are not what they seem, the true arguments are never what they say, but beneath the posturing and all the swagger of the Danes, we are truly loyal to our friends, and we do sacrifice ourselves if that is what is necessary.

It is a feeling and a vibe, we are one all we who came down on the boats to the German mainland, to Northern France, to England and Scotland, and then to Ukraine and the US, to Australia. We carry the honor of the old ways, and that is a way of loyalty to our friends.

G-d bless the will of spirit in the pursue of peace.

Today in Europe there is this discussion on whether we should have borders or not. Basically the liberal part of the political landscape, including a great part of the so called rightwing, believe that a borderless society is a good thing. Some refer to Adam Smith, and his ideas in free markets, other refer to Karl Marx and his ideas about borderless solidarity between workers. 

Both, to be honest, very vague ideas, and therefor impossible to implement. There is no inherent philosophical quality in the ideas, and as a consequence, it falls apart. Most prominently in France and Great Britain where Ukip and Front National are truly sweeping the ballot boxes. 

But is there really a deeper discussion in the political problem we are facing. Honestly what really makes me annoyed is when someone forces a half measured principle on me, and then becomes all surprised when it falls apart. It is off cause a lack of mine, I should be more tolerant towards amateurism, but it still nags me, that the so called founders of the EU did not employ someone with a bit more skill when they started out the project. At least use a decent philosopher. 

Anyway, despite my difficult stance on this issue, I will try to be as objective as possible in the discussion. There are several stations one could touch, and should touch in the process. First of all, to be fair, it has worked before, mainly in the United States, where separate units became of multistate, or rather as it is called; United States – of America. 

It took a Great War, and a deep philosophical debate and fight to make the United States of America, and the peoples inhabiting the different states were not at all rooted in the new territory. So they were much more easily swayed and often cajoled into a superstate. 

This is not the case with Europe, here we are talking about ancient tribes living in an area, that they have fought over for three thousand years. Add to this roots of philosophy so deep it is hardly imaginable. This small area on the globe has won all the fights it has had with any other civilization, and still controls the entire world. Not directly anymore, but mainly through its glorious off spring. 

So, you want them all to be United in one state. Is that even possible? Well I suppose it was possible at a time, before the Schengen. At this time, there was a positive air around the project, and with a bit more skill, the peoples of Europe could have been swayed into an agreement. But the Schengen changed all that, because mixing up people across borders was simply doing too much in too short a time. The peoples started feeling lost, and conflicts started to emerge. When you do something against the wish of people, you often get a violent reaction. So the project has become absolutely impossible to go through with. Already it is seen as the mother of all problems, because it does not argue very well for its ideas. Again here we see the basic problem of the project; amateurism. 

At the end, nobody really wants the project, and that is why we have the basic problem, because amateurism is the effect of a poor workforce. The best minds are attracted by ideas, challenges and real progress. Something the EU cannot offer, so they must do with the second best. 

What has really happened, it is a reawakening of the tribal ideology. We see Danes, Englishmenn, Swedes, Frenchman, Dutch forming up. We talk about the nation, but behind that idea lies the feeling of a tribe. The tribe can be formed up genetically, but it can also be defined as a cultural entity. As in Judaism, where you can become a Jew, if you really make an effort, and deserve it. The same goes with Danes, Dutch and so on. You can become one of the tribe, if you really make effort. 

Tribes are, traditionally, a positive idea, that underlines the pursue of justice, prosperity and highculture for the tribe. The borders are extremely important, because with this you can ensure security and development. 

Within the tribe, there is the sanctuary of law and religion, originally demarked by stones or simpler as lines. 

These different principles battle in these times, and we will see what will win. But one thing is certain. With great experiment comes a violent proces. And the EU is, unfortunately for all the peoples of Europe, one of those utopian projects, that has absolute no idea about the result of what it has started. 

So we all brace ourselves for the storm, settle in, and harvest our resources for the fight. 

I do not condemn the aims of the European Union, I believe in peace. But I do condemn the haphazard process it has begun. Millions and millions of people around in Europe are witnessing devastating consequences of the project, and they pay a price they do not deserve to pay. All because some politicians believed they had the arrogant right to choose for them, though they had never earned that right. 

G-d bless the will of spirit in the face of the storm that will soon hit Europe. 

The Middle East i trying to regain momentum in the international world. Everything we have today was invented in the Middle East, or at least most of it, but the West has surpassed and gone farther.

What was it really that gave the West momentum? Was it Newton? Machiavelli? Nietzsche? Adam Smith? Voltaire? Well, as I see it, I believe the most important philosopher or scientist that really made all the difference was a Danish scientist called Tycho Brahe.

He was a part of the Italian renaissance five hundred years ago, and he had one thing that really inspired many scientists and philosophers of his time; the method of precision. Until his time, a lot of the observations made within astronomy and natural science at large, was highly imprecise. It was so, so – and more or less. So nothing could be certain, everything was speculation.

Tycho Brahe changed that. He made instruments extremely precise. So precise nothing was really seen like it before. He was extremely thorough as well, methodical, and could thereby prove that the understanding of the world we had until then. That a system where all stars, moons and planets were placed on a crystal-sphere, and thereby immobile, was wrong. He proved it wrong with his instruments. The ground breaking work; De nova stella, the new star, proved that things actually move in the sky.

Ever since that, natural science has been all about prove, precision, methods to advance the understanding of the universe.

Values I try to implement in my work, though it is difficult with metaphysics and politics.

But it is basically a cultural trait. It is the way we think up here north, and it works.

So, making a renaissance in Egypt and elsewhere where science really started, a focus on proveability, methodology and thoroughness is a good way to perhaps rekindle all the light that was once in the Middle East, but now on a modern basis.

G-d bless you all, and may the light shine once again in all your cities.

Human or social engineering as the politicians and the policy makers have been doing the last forty years in Europe is missing a point. You can steer human development into some canyons and riverbeds of development, but there is one thing you have to accept, that you cannot control, and should never control. The most ferocious and unforgiving of all forces in human socity. The one force that always is the mother or all revolutions; the need. The human need. The stronger the human need is, the more difficult it is to control. As in the French Revolution, where the true need behind all the marvelous philosophy of the revolution was a simple need to eat. Marie Antoinette ate cakes, but the people had no bread. So they stood up to her, to have bread. The same goes with the Russian revolution, where the people were starving due to the First World War. Another need not covered, and a kingdom a thousand years old fell.

The same is going on in Europe right now the peoples of Europe are in need of security. The politician still believe in the grand plans of the European Union. But the people just need to have a job and be safe. Mass epidemics of rape, massive increase of criminality, societies broken down, creates a need.

So the people rebel. They elect leaders the establishment does not like, because they go against the powerful EU elite. They support free thinking cartoonists. It is a mess.

So far, the current system has backtracked, fought for its ideas, persecuted some of the freethinkers, pushed the multicultural agenda. But it is like trying to make a dam in front of a lake. The more you dam up the water, the stronger the pressure becomes, and the cracks keep on coming.

Why? Because of the needs of people. You can take away their freedom, their entertainment, let them eat a poor meal. But if you accept and even condemn them when their daughters are raped, they live in constant fear, they see their very world torn down in front of them. They will rebel.

Now, this force is so strong it creates revolutions. It turns everything upside down. And so far it has been creative of a powerful paradigmatic shift inside Europe. Seeds have been sown, and they are ready to blossom.

But the elites still do not get it. They cling on to “more of the same”. And hope that if just the right amount of pressure and the right amount of skill is applied and used, everything will be fine.

They do not know the force of the need.

I have tried to create new ways for the needs to be used, in a constructive manner. Because as needs are devastating, they are also the opportunity for rebirth and regrowth. The fining, the catarsis, the burning away of all our own corruption, in the making of new good societies.

This is the way it is, when someone or something stands at its own deathbed. It is either winning it all, or loosing it all. But we need to listen carefully, otherwise the needs will end us up in darkness, a powerful destructive force will kill us all, and end the life of Europe.

This the stakes we are meeting, perhaps some heads should be turned the right way, ask the right questions, and start doing something about it, before it is too late.

G-d bless the will to unite and grow strong again.

Congratulations mr. Netanyahu. That was an all odds against you win. But with a little help from your friends, you overcame the troubles in front of you.

First of all, this gives you a ticket to pursue the security of Israel. To be a true leader in terms of defense and protection. The war against IS has just begun, and Israel needs to be tough and strong in the coming years. There will be many challenges, and true difficulties.

I do not believe in a peaceagreement with the Gaza strip, it is too volatile, and all the evil, terrible measures it has taken to make its bid, disqualifies it as a viable partner. They should not be tyrannized, that would make us be like them, but making a deal is against any reason.

The deal with Iran however is another matter. We have a chance here, as I see it. Iran is all in for it, and the constituency, with the new Kahlon party will seek for a compromise on this issue. Added to the pressure mr. Obama puts on this issue (it is his defining foreign policy project), there seems to be a lot of pressure.

I would sue for a hand on the deal. Make amends with mr. Obama and seek a way to ensure a deal that all will be able to live with.

If the deal is broken, go back to the attack plans.

Iran is a very religious country. They hate us, because we are corrupted and evil, but they are not evil themselves, in itself. Iranians believe that what they do, they do it for the good of spirit. As in all matters of spirit, understanding the way of spirit is what guides us all.

I have supported them for a long time, because we basically agree on the focus on G-d, and somehow this project is something that binds us together. I never planned it, it happened because we realized, we had a lot in common after all. As with Egypt, that I believe that I have contributed to a lot, in a very positive way (Egypt is really finding itself these days), the same can happen, if we are as lucky as in Egypt, with Iran.

Who does not want to in alignment with itself? Who does not want to be hundred percent Jew, Persian, Dane, Egyptian or American? We all want to be ourselves, and we want to be a romantic version of ourselves. The heroes of old, the Cyrus, the David, the Churchill. This is what all wants, and the heroes would not be heroes if they had not been fair and just.

Anyway, the telephone is open. Not as a way to bind, but as a way of friendship.

G-d bless Israel.

We have an immense problem in Northern Europe. The problem can be boiled down to a devastating attack by Muslim extremists on our very societies. Muslims who are despised by the Arab world have a free rein in Northern Europe, often defining what it is to be Muslim.

I mean Hizb-Ut-Tahrir, direct supports of IS, are often coveted and supported in Northern Europe, The Muslim Brotherhood used to be as well. But in the Middle East they are despised.

So who are we to judge? Why cant we see, that the perpetrators who are laying waste to our societies, use methods as rape and sharia police in our cities to fight us, are not just representative of all Muslims? Why cant we just say it as it is; we are encountering a vile, secteric, inhuman version of Islam. A version where all the mean and destructive parts of Islam is amplified and brought to an extreme.

Why cant we just say that, and start doing something about it?

It is because of fear. Terror, some call it. We are scared, and due to this scare, we are willing to sacrifice our young women, our societies, our wealth, our security. Terror works.

So what do we do to counter it?

Well, seen from an enlightenment perspective, we need to reflect the ideas of enlightenment in our daily actions. Enlightenment is an idea of one of our main allies in the Arab world; Egypt. Humanism is the creative and spiritual child of Heliopopis, the city of light.

We need to be inspired by the ones who actually understand the ups and downs of the world, and use the positive ideas they are themselves carriers of.

There are two modes; the light of the moon and the light of the sun.

The sunwielders are mighty sacrifising warriors, who brings the light into the Platonic cave, often paying with their own lives and comfort. Today we call them bloggers. They are despised, ridiculed, hated. Because the light they shine on us is too much, and we cannot take it. But they are the best in us, the most honest, the strongest and our guiding stars.

Then there is the light of the moon. The light of the moon is connected to the myth of Isis and Osiris. The mother of virginity wandered the pallid earth, and was sucked into the needs and the cravings of flesh. She however had her savior; her son Osiris, he saved her, by shining so much light into her world, that she was not blinded, but could use it to see again. This is the story behind Christian redemption by Christ. Christ will save us, by his gentle light.

This is the light of those who are less prone to fighting. Who wish to find a path that they and their close ones can travel. This is the savior of the many.

This is the path of the pastor and the priest, this is the crutch of the everyday labor.

Through this method may we be saved.

Gentle light on the problems will ensure that we can tackle it, little by little, bit by bit.

G-d bless the light of the world, however we see it.

The election in Israel is coming to an end. Let me be clear about this. I support, 100 %, mr. Netanyahu. He has been clear, decisive, intelligent, honest and extremely skilled in his defense of Israel. He has his faults as everybody else. But in a volatile situation where enemies are all over, mr. Netanyahu is the right man to support. On top of this he actually does balance between liberal and conservative stances, especially in the late Gazan war. Something he never got the right amount of praise for. The conservative part could not see the balance he actually made.

We very much disagree on Iran, but we hold the same values. We are in the same party. We analyze things a little differently, but we want the same.

So, if I can do anything to help, please ask me. If it is about Iran, why not give me a call? I will listen to all arguments, all evidence presented by all parties. I am not swayed by pressure, but logic arguments are what turns my ideas, and I am open to any.

But, as I see it, mr. Netanyahu is the right president.

G-d bless Israel.

We try to remember what we can, but a basic premise of being man, is to forget. Therefor, things that seemed obvious once will be forgotten in the next day.

Here in the Scandinavic cultures, we have forgotten who we are. It is all good, that we are inspired by this and that beautiful philosophy, but truly we should also remember who we ourselves are. Our identity is worth something. It is something we should not forget, something that is just ours to preserve and give us something to be special about.

I think the rationalistic enlightened paradigm we have immersed ourselves in makes us blind sometimes, to other ways of seeing the world. We believe, in our arrogance, that our version of reality is the only viable. But, there are many other version of the world, and how can we be sure that ours is the right one?

Off cause I believe that rationalism and enlightenment is the basis we should stand on, but perhaps a more humble attitude to the world view would make it easier to be us.

Instead of believing we hold the only answers, we should perhaps be ready to accept, that it is a version of reality we should be ready to defend and fight for.

If we do not understand how other people think, then how are we to navigate and put forth arguments for our way of things?

G-d bless true wisdom.

There is more peace, and less war. But always these forces of light and darkness, order and chaos are surviving in an eternal embrace.

True spirituality must serve G-d. If it is only another selfagrandisment or another personal gain one gets by calling upon G-ds name, it is not G-d one follows, but the dark lord. It is as simple as that.

Evil is always present, and most often in the people who demands moral authority without humility. Those who know for certain what is right or wrong. Be it Herodes, Levfebrians, fanatic Christians, Hindu, Jews or Muslim.

They know what is right, and as a consequence believe to have the moral authority to persecute and subdue. But you never know the way of G-d. You may have an idea, or you may find a guiding star. But we as men are too simple to really understand the ins and outs of what G-d wants, the grander scheme, the great objective. We are simpletons compared to G-d, and should therefor be humble to try and understand his plan. Never be arrogant and all knowing, we are but small ants compared to the wisdom of G-d.

Now, there is a lot of fighting going on in the Middle East right now, and the two main strands of Islam are in an infight. As often before. Why? Why is it necessary? Is there a greater goal? Who will benefit? Will G-d and love and peace be strengthened, or just the gain of the man on earth?

These questions should be asked and answered sincerely before going into another war. Because war is the mother of all misery, and misery is the paycheck of the dark lord.

So please, understand your own motives before you strike. Not your gain, but your endgame. What is it you will truly get from going into another devastating war.

And I will tell you now; you will gain nothing. Only lose lives and prestige. People will say; oh it is the primitives of the Middle East, fighting yet again, and they will not come to the Middle East to understand who they themselves are. They will just fly over it as another unruly spot on earth, better not meddled with.

Therefor unity is better, brotherhood of man is better, honesty and humility is better. Not egoism and selfishness.

G-d bless the peace we may have, if we are wise enough.

Now the crisis in Ukraine is on the mend, it is not over, but it is getting much better. The inital redrawing of heavy weaponry is underway, and the conflict surrounding the terrible civililian disaster in Debaltseve has been concluded. One way or the other, it is a bad deal for the Ukraine side, and a good deal for the independent republic side. Russia won, hands down, we need to give mr. Putin that.

But, as a man of peace, I am more interested in the longterm implications of the conflict. War is always terrible, the civilians in harms way are paying heavily for the problems we as international peace brokers cannot solve. Human beings pay, children cannot go to school, friends who knew each other their entire life separate, families are broken. This is the face of war.

Therefor war is always to be avoided.

Now, hopefully the dialogue and healing can begin. This is important, to mend the wounds and get back on a more amiable track. Wounds will fester if they are not healed, and perhaps here the churches can play a good role as arbiters of truth and consolation. We need the churches to heal wounds and help those in need of salvation and in need of just a place to have shelter.

This should be an international project, where all good churches should chip in and try to help those in need.

Also Jews are in danger, here again international Jewish agencies should help and save those poor souls who are in danger. I know this has been underway all the time already, but a focus on the healing process could be an item of interest, in the interest of Jewish life in the area and the traditions that they uphold.

I really think that the EU should not abuse the situation and use the catastrophe for their own gain. No, Russia is not a bad guy, it is a nation with national interests. As all other nations. Using the needs of Russia, to protect Russians, is fanning the flames, and people will die and suffer from this course. Be humane, think of the people in need, not just on your own needs. Your needs are not interesting in the face of children dying and people loosing the homes.

G-d bless you all, and thank you for your inherent kindness, that is shown in the actions of peacemaking.

In these days, where all we believe in is a stake, we need heroes. What is a hero in a modern time? It is a man or a woman, who risk his life, his future and his very existence for a cause. These people are very, very rare because they are made of a special material. They do not simply get up in the morning and got on with their daily business, they rise to fight another day, to challenge the status qua another day, to make a better a world out of all the chaos we have.

My friend is one of those rare people here on earth, and I am proud, not jut proud, but truly humbled by the attention I get from him, and the inspiration he gives me.

He is called Lars Vilks, and he has just been the attention of a major attempt on his life here in Denmark. He is my hero, my best friend, my little light in the vast darkness that surrounds us, and there is no doubt, that the ideas he believes in will be the ones we should fight for. That is humanistic, democratic ideals, with an acceptance of all Muslims who believe in peace, and a fierce stance against all Muslims who believe in Islamic State and the international Caliphate.

I believe, that one day, the world will turn again, and once again it will cry for freedom, once again will it defy all the corruption and destruction the late ideas have given us, and start having faith in democracy again.

The bannermen we should have, should be of the most durable material, the finest specimen of the human race. The most courageous, the most true, the most honest.

And now we have one of them, and he is called Lars Vilks.

I have linked to an interview with him after the attack, here you can perhaps get at feeling of his power. It is in Swedish, but if anything else, check out his unflinching blue eyes as he is called out on his belief in democray, and you will be awed.

https://www.dr.dk/tv/se/deadline/deadline-2015-03-06#!/33:54

G-d bless the heroes we still have, and may they be protected.

Another time another enemy:

The middle East. The place where the Hittities invented the asylum, where the Egyptian priests invented humanism, where the Assyrians invented kingship and astronomy, where writing was invented, agriculture, the wheel, aristocracy, mathematics, metaphysics, science.

This is the place we today bicker over, send our bombs over, with often very little understanding of all the layers of history and progress made there.

We are only fools to judge people in the Middle East, let alone believe we can guide anyone. We can perhaps give the Middle East something back, as Lawrence of Arabia, who through the meticolous application of Oxfordian methods dug up ancient ideas and artifacts of the Hittities.

Perhaps as me, who have dug up ancient principles that the Middle East can use to regain some footing.

But lecturing the Middle East? That is simply stupid and arrogant. We need to show respect for the ancient lore of the peoples there, because we can ourselves learn so much.

As the Coptic Church that I have fallen in love with. Such a simple and true church. There is no arrogance, and an immense acceptance of the burdens they bear. So beautiful.

This is a lesson to all of us, especially the Catholic and Anglican church. Look at them; the forefathers of Moses, with a simple and honest air, with a very direct connection to their congregation. With an ethical stand we can only dream to aquire. They go to the desert to make a joyful party in the midst of the danger.

Honest, sacrifising, simple and yet immensly deep.

This the Middle East. Something to revere and respect, not control.

G-d bless the ancient land of Two lands, Assyria, Babylon, Israel, Arabia and all the rest.

We are coming to an end in the infight between mr. Netayahu and mr. Obama. It is about the Iran deal. I have, after I beat mr. Ahmadinejad in the first tenure together with mr. Obama, been in for a deal.

I believe in diplomacy as the first recourse, and only fighting as the second recourse. Sometimes it works, other times it does not work.

With Iran it works, because Iranians are basically a very gifted and positive people, the basic virtues of the realm of Persia is positive. It is an ancient nation of high culture, and is accostumed to be a leader in matters of religion and civilization. As Cyrus as Avicenna as Zoroaster. All great men who contributed to world civilization.

Now, in this discussion I am in direct disagreement with mr. Netanyahu. Mr. Netanyahu does not trust the current government of Iran, well, I cannot blame him. Given the current shadow fighting between Israel and Iran. I mean, in the last Gazan war, one of the main sponsors of the war was Iran. Add to this a direct link between Hamas and Iran, this is logical. Add to this his responsability to protect the Jewish people, a historical task, that has been given to towering figures as Solomon, David, Ben Gurion and Ariel Sharon, he is in a line of great men, that he has to live up to. Not easy, but possible.

I just have the fealing, that diplomacy will work, why? Because there is an opening and we do share the same values as Iran. Honestly, would Iran terminate the holy city, with the most holy of sites not only to Christians but also the Muslims, I do not think so. They are far too civilized for that. We are not talking ISIS here, but a mature and humane rule, that tries to find its place in history.

I do not know the deal that mr. Obama has made, but I trust him, and I believe it to be a good one. After all, it is not the content of the deal that matters, it is the attitude. Are we to fight more or to find peace?

I vote for peace, as long as there is a chance for it, and dialogue is continued.

I know that this goes against the interest of mr. Netanyahu, but as there was Haman and Esther, there was also Cyrus, and both these trends within Persia is a reflection of what Persia is.

G-d bless the will for peace.

Now, I have evolved a little. In the beginning it was all resistance movement and hell bent on fighting back the evil foe we have in our midst. Now it has become much more ”acceptable”, I have readers from all layers of the society, especially leaders who need inspiration to tackle all their numerous problems.

So the conflicts with my own close society have become less. That is in way a blessing, it gets straining to be an outcast for so long. It is ok, and I suppose you can get used to it, but at the end of the day, kids needs to go to school, birthdays are to be held, and endless conflict with everybody around you is a bit draining.

Now it seems to me, that my friend Tommy Robinson from the EDL have had a bit of the same development. From the endless fighting and the problems of organizing a huge defense league, to the more mellow and less straining existence as a politician and a leader. I really hope Tommy will have a reprieve, and people will start listening to him again. Because he has all the right answers. It is not about subjecting anyone to his will, and he is truly not a racist. He is a conservative liberal, as mr. Churchill, but with a new mix of agendas to consider.

Please let that guy in, he is all you have for a hero right now, but he is, at the same time, the best of us all. True, honest, sincere and protective.

Please, if any of my ideas and words have ever given you anything, give him the benefit of the doubt, he deserves it.

You will only be healed if you are able to be whole.

G-d bless England

For a long time, people branded me a racist, a warmonger and troublemaker. When I confronted the Danish public with the fact, that a huge epidemics of rape, was at hand in the country they themselves loved and cherised, they did all they could to banish me. It ran directly contrary to all they believed in of tolerance and multiculture.

I have looked behind the veils, and understood the face of islamism. Seen what it did to tear down people and landmarks of great antiquity, torture people and use means so terrible Stephen King would have shied away from using them in his books, altough he is supposed to be the most far creative in horror imagination. Burning children? Slaughtering innocents? Enslaving innocents Christian girls. For what? Just to subdue whoever is in their way.

This is the true face of the Islamic state, of the international caliphate we are fighting.

But in the beginning the socalled enlightened people of the higher intellectual hierarchies did not understand that, their horizon was too narrow, they saw only simple things as race and tolerance.

The world is not simple it is complex, and tolerance as a virtue without understanding how the world works is like jumping up and down in a playpen without knowing anything about the world.

I do not know who invented these half measures, but they should at least read Plato or Aristotle. I mean if we are supposed to have a civilisation, we actually have to take it serious, otherwise we are just children playing with toys we do not understand, with the predicable result.

So now, after the Islamic state has realised its true face, we have the opportunity to discuss, truly, who they are, and what they are doing.

They are descendants of the dark lord, if there is any sense in talking about evil and good. Torture, slaving, burning children, that is the work of the dark lord. He is still here, and he is coming for us.

This reflects our actions, and gives us the impetus to use other means to fight. Because, this is what we are forced to do. We need to be fair, honest, and not use excessive force. We are not to use torture, we are not to lie about the war, we are to be absolutely fair in our actions and our thought.

G-d bless the wisdom of the ancients.

There has been a lot of fuss here in Denmark after the attack on some of my friends, and on the Jewish synagogue. People are really showing their true colors, and the politicians are falling over each other to come to our rescue. Or, in a strange way, it does not seem to be about us intellectuals, all the fuss, but more about harvesting voters, or well, just communication. The solutions have been close to lamb and often absolutely stupid. Everybody is talking about preventive measures, as if no one actually have realized WE ARE AT WAR.

Denmark is not France. In France, the home of philosophy and ethics, the support to ethnic minorities, and intellectuals is actually very strong, also in practise. Here in Denmark, we seem more to be a nuisance to get rid of. Now, everybody have walked with torches, and after that it seems to me, it is back to X-factor.

I have, however been witness to some amazing acts of heroism. My acquaintance Dan Park was at the meeting that was attacked, and he did not flinch, just took another sip of his beer. While as everybody else scrambled for cover. That man has some guts.

I just hope, we will see some kind of action, but not on unenlightened basis, based on knowledge. But, we will see.

G-d bless the peace we will find.