These days, it is the ten year anniversary for the Mohammad cartoon crisis. In a strange way, we revisit all he feelings and all the mental turmoil of that time, and in a way we see who the real enemies are; the weak and traitorous European states and what we have seen as “Islamic State”.

One of my good friends made a piece of art yesterday, or rather a happening. What he did was mounting a “islamic stats flag” on a pole, and wanted to tie this to a statue of a troll. The symbolism was a reference to all the Christians who are at prey in the Middle East, by the Islamic state.

Now, what would you expect from such a happening. That the Islamic state came and did something about it? To the contrary, they were much more interested in another exhibition of SIAD where Anders Gravers exhibited a number of drawings of Mohammad.

So who then took affair, when Islamic state was too weak (after we have been bombing them for may years), you guess it, the Danish police!They came and put my painter friend in handcuffs and took him to the police station. For doing something that is a praise of our armed forces in The Middle East!

But it goes deeper. It is the cowardice of not only the police, but also the media, who chose not to give the ten year anniversary any attention (except for Jyllands Posten). The schools, the cultural institutions, any of the states activities.

In this we can see, that it is not the Islamic State only that we fight, it is the cowardice of our own state and all its representatives. All the people who have no guts and are afraid that they may be at the end of the barrel one day.

So let us all show solidarity with all the victims of Islamic State. All those poor souls, be it Yazidi or Christian as they have been slaughtered and put to the cross. As we, as lonely souls are all that care. The state fights us, showing that what they are, is dysfunct. They do not work in the interest of the people anymore, and certainly not of Christians. They are so afraid of the Islamic State, that they rush out to do their dirty work, even though the Islamic state does not have the ressources! Oh the irony.

G-d bless all the victims of the savages persecuting the weak.

Well, after all the chaos of the discussion of the 160.000 refugees/migrants, at least Europe is stepping in the right direction.

Here are my recommendations.

1. Doing things in the Middle East is like putting your hand inside a wasps nest. It is a hive of minds so ancient we have no idea, or rather, few of us have some idea, but it demands a thorough understanding of Middle Eastern Culture, history and most important of all; religion. There has ever only been one single European individual who have ever had any success, that is Lawrence of Arabia, exactly because he had these qualities. Now you have me, so you have a chance.
2. Going into the Middle East, is going into a quagmire of world power interests. We cannot, as Europe, lift much in terms of political capital. We are competing with China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the US, and most important of all; Israel. So forget about going to the Middle East as great saviours, we have some money, that is it. Apart from that, all you have, is me.
3. We have been working on a peace plan for quite some time. The entire foreing policy of mr. Barack Obama hinges on this. That is, we are trying to mend fences with Russia and Iran. This has come a long way, if it works, it will be the single greatest achievement of Obamas foreign policy, in fact the greatest achievement of his, at all. So, we should be very careful not to ruin this. If we do, we will ruin most of the good will we have with the US. Not to mention alienating Putin even more.

So it is one of those extremely difficult processes that you simply cannot do alone. First of all, Europe does not have any political capital to mention worldwide. Mostly because the European Union is such a mess, and nobody wants to work with a looser, sorry but that is the reality of it all. Secondly, the anti Israel stance that most of the ruling elite in the EU has, is very much noticed in Tel Aviv, and not having a good relationship with Israel, rules out doing anything in the Middle East. Israel is the hub, and only if Israel and Israeli policy makers are satisfied, can we do anything at all. Lucky for you, I have saved Israel numerous times, so I have an amassed political capital that I have tried to use making peace. I will use it as well in defusing the migrant crisis, if I get hands on through the UN. Otherwise I will focus only on the Middle Eastern peace proces. I owe this to my friends in Washington, Tel Aviv, Cairo, Teheran, Moscow and Riyadh.

Anyway, I do understand that some politicians in Europe do not like me much, I have never hidden my dislike for the European Union. But to make this work, you need me.

So, call the UN, plug me in, or cancel the project.

G-d bless the will of the almighty working according to the principle of Sodom and Gomorra.

At the synod in the Anglican church, we need to focus on two things. One; how to heal a fractured church, that feels alienated internally. Healing is here the answer. That is, trying to reach each other in dialogue, and also try and heal the wounds of controversies in earlier times.

Two; there is the very difficult problems of the clash between the islamic extremists of Sahara and the Christians in Middle Africa. These clashes are extremely violent, and we need to help them. Here I think the Anglican should be, well; Anglican. To be Anglican is not to be meek and receiving, it is to fight.

We need, as a church and as the international society, to help the Anglicans who are in harms way with the fight they are fighting. Protect them, so that they can have peace.

G-d bless the will to work in the light of the creator.

I think each church, synagogue or mosque should find something in the lore of the monotheistic religions for themselves. Conditions change, and what will work here, will not work there, or the other way around. But there are some of those themes, that are universal, and all houses of worship should remember from time to time.

There is a saying, that when Akhenaten was with his family, it was all peaceful. At least, that is what you can deduce from the pictures of his grave tomb. Families holding hands, daughter, father, sibling. This peace was a healing thing. Whenever we look at these people, we know, that deep under our religions, there is that rock bottom of faith. This is healing.

The Anglican church is in great danger of falling into pieces. Why? Because there is little faith. I remember the discussion in Oxford where rev. Brian Mountford sold a book on the crisis of the atheists in the face of the church and vice versa. It seems the Anglican church has become an empty shell.

But what is really the deep sanctient truth of the Anglican church? My forefathers came from Angles here in Denmark, and those who traveled from Denmark to England thousands of years ago, where my forefathers. Now vikings, as they are called, have a bad rep. You would then ascertain, that the deepest roots of that being Anglican is rotten. But I beg you to differ. Our forefathers where not villains, yes they were fighters and there were bandits among them. But to themselves, they held one virtue very much to their breast; the virtue of kin. Kin was the basis of their world. Their forefathers, their brothers, and their cousins. With them, they always wanted peace, so strongly, that they were willing to fight for that peace.

In this lie a truth, that will salvage the Anglican Church. The peace that Anglicans offer, is not a meek or a unmoving peace. It is an active peace. Peace is not won by prayer only, but by going out in the world, and changing it. Be with the suffering, help where help is needed. But also by supporting those who are in danger of succumbing in war.

There is another great virtue of the Anglican church, that I really like. That of it being a church of healing.

If nothing else, then do heal. Heal the community that you serve. But how do you do that? You do it by being strong in your own faith.

Why would people go to the church at sunday? To hear a boring lecture of how to behave, or listen to long psalms? No, many people are suffering, they come to hear a small word, that may lift their spirit. That word, that may give them the ability to face another week, suffering, being sick, having a joyless job, being in a difficult situation.

That healing, that Jesus Christ gave, was not a unmoving healing, something to forget about, it was an active healing. He came, and he gave.

As when he did it on a sunday, though it was forbidden and pharisees decided to take his life.

That is the true example that could redeem the Anglican Church. Heal, by faith the world that you serve, wherever is may be.

G-d bless the Anglican Church.

According to the german philosopher Schopenhauer, inquiry into something may rest on an honest basis, that is trying to find truth, or rest un an basically primitive and self-aware basis, that is to win the argument.

Here we have the sophists on one hand, and the true academics on the other hand. He argues, in the same line as Machiavelli, that such a thing as an honest quest for truth is not possible, as soon as you counterpart starts to fight for his point of view without any concern for the truth, the truhtseeking part will fail. So, it is better, the argument goes, to be the ones that attack, gaining an early advantage.

Sophism is everywhere these days, especially in the media, that seem have forgotten all the ideals of Voltaire, and delves into a full-blown heuristic discourse or dialectics.

The worst example is the poor little boy found dead at the beach a few weeks back, the media went all ballistic about it. At the same time, numerous sexual attacks were reported in Munich both, and that was most extensively, on other refugees, but German girls were also targeted making Munich one big brothel.

So, the media put all the focus on the one angle ignoring the other angle, making it extremely difficult for the public to truly decipher what was going on, and even worse for policy makers to make any serious decisions onto the matter.

This is a clear example of sophism. The media tends to be overwhelmingly liberal, focusing on the migrants/refugees as victims, not taking into consideration, that some of them are not victims, but in the same league as many of the bandits that roam in Africa and Middle East, Boko Haram, IS and so on.

The point is, it is a difficult situation at best, and very difficult truly. Just seeing things in a simple light may gain a feeling of superiority and a win in the political battle between conservatives and liberal. But this is too perilous a situation to throw in attacks from left to right. People are needing and generations of young women, some of them abused for years, are left in the cold because of this stupid war between left and right. We need to help these people, not tend our own little projects and power.

Well, to hope for a rational discourse is perhaps a little difficult in the situation with all the feelings running amok. But at least policy makers should keep a cool head, and act according to the maximum humanistic path. We both have to help the true refugees, and we need to protect the poor women at pray from evil men.

G-d bless the willingness to see things as they are, in the light of the creator.

It seems to me, that the cards are played differently this time. As we wind down the road, fighting IS, it actually happens that this cause will unite us all.

The atrocities, the immoral behaviour is obvious to all. It comes to the extreme that it might actually solve the Syrian crisis. If we can unite in the area, we can make peace in most of Syria, and actually stop the conflict.

This enhances the probability of a solution to the European crisis of migration. Remember the refugees in Europe comes from Syria. If the crisis is solved, the migration crisis in Europe is also solved, at least for the part of refugees that come from Syria.

All in all, it is like one of those games where all the pieces of the puzzle seem confusing in the beginning, but then all of a sudden, everything just comes together.

If this actually works, we will have peace in the Middle East, and the road is paved for a religious process uniting all three monotheistic religions.

Just like that, what a beautiful thing. It must be the work of G-d, otherwise we could not have seen such a thing.

We should look to spirit and thank him for this opportunity of peace.

G-d bless the wisdom of the almighty.

In order to end the refugee streaming over the borders, a good cooperation with Assad and a hospitable understanding in the vicinity is important.

We should ask Assad what he thinks. I mean, it is his citizens that are fleeing the horrors of his country, so we need to understand what he would like us to do as well.

One thing is the need of the refugees, but what about the need of Syria? If the entire middle class flees to Germany, who will help rebuilding Syria when the war is over?

Things are not so simple, and we need to understand this in depth.

As the peace process endures and hopefully concludes in a solution where all who want peace hold their hands for a better future of The Middle East. Hopefully we can all focus on stopping the atrocities of IS, and thereby stop the warring in Syria.

It is about the power you have at your disposal, and how you use it.

We need to help the peace in Syria, in order to stop all the suffering of the people of Syria.

Things are going quite well for mr. Barack Obama in this regard, and hopefully we can crown it with a lasting peace. It will not be easy, but it is possible.

G-d bless the peace we can find, if we try.

Now, the downfall of the European Union should not stop the peace process in the Middle East. I know that these two things are interconnected, but, a major war for a caliphate by Islamic State in Europe, is not exactly the best PR stunt for Islam.

Islam is, as any other religion prone to go berserk or find peace. It is like that. You can choose what you want to do yourself.

I have tried to support the downfall of IS, while I have tried to put up the framework for a cooperation between all three monotheistic religions.

We must do both, and I know this will seem difficult right now, but if the situation is controlled in Europe, hopefully the conflict will be limited.

But for now, I hope we can find as much peace as possible, for the wellbeing of man. And always remember, the Jew, gentile, Christian, Muslim or atheist, we are all people, created in the vision of spirit.

we can choose to go down in hail of flame as the IS supporters, or we can choose to serve mankind.

G-d bless the will to be peaceful in the face of overwhelming odds.

The entire EU is under an immense pressure, and as mr. Jean-Claude Juncker said, the bells are tolling. The tools that I have given will work, but it will only take off the pressure, all the inherent problems of islamic extremism and the works, will still be there, and it will grow worse and worse until we take it seriously.

Talking about Germany, it is pretty obvious, that things have gone horribly wrong. Fighting in the streets, mayhem in München and so on and so forth.

This will take a long time to do something about, but we need to do it.

Conflict is bound to arise, due to the simple fact, that many of the Muslims in Europe are even more radical than in the Middle East, and more well equipped with money and resources.

This will go down some kind of horrible path anyway, and there is not a question on to whether we should tackle it, but rather on what scale and with what means.

As always, the more efficient and humane you tackle a crisis, the less it will develop into a full scale war. But I seriously have my doubts as to whether we will succeed in tackling this with the least possible violence.

It will be violent, it already is. We are moving away from the 68´ths values and ideas, and moving towards the conclusion of their flawed ideas.

It will hell, and from that hell something will eventually rise, I seriously hope it will a democratic and conservative/humanistic order. But, that will require action from those who believe in that. Serious action, with humanity and honesty as a goal.

How do you fight a war without being seriously morally debased?

You do it, by always looking at the the end result of your game, and by never loosing sight of your means.

If you start using means that are too harsh, you have a problem. But if you always use the least possible means to solve a situation, you will win morally.

G-d bless Germany as he struggles with the flood overwhelming his barriers.

My feeling is, that there is a bit of movement in my bid to start a cooperation with the UNHCR. It would make sense, if I was an employee or an ambassador, I could reach out to all the players in the Middle East, and start the peace process in earnest.

Many in Iran see the West as an immoral place. In some ways they are right. There is a lot of corruption and double talk in the West. But recently, due to the end of the Cold war, and the advent of the Internet, things have started to change.

It started with mr. Barack Obamas bid to change the foreign policy to a more honest approach, and now it has, so far, concluded itself in the peace process.

The current leaders of the West are all trying to find solutions that are as ethical as possible. Working for peace.

But, we need to ramp up the process, and the marriage of my ideas with the ideas of UNHCR makes sense. I will be able to apply a deeper level of philosophical thinking, and perhaps make a problem solving institute in the service of mankind. I have the backing of the Americans, and therefor we could see and end to war in the Middle East, at least on a multinational level.

Add to this the work on the refugee crisis, and we would have numerous solutions at hand.

We will have peace, though the path will be rugged and difficult. But lives are holy, and we should all remember, that in the eye of spirit, each grain of life is a reflection of him, and we should act accordingly, with respect and care for all life.

G-d bless the will to be humble in a difficult and devastating row of problems meeting us.

Politics according to Seneca, is about seeing things as they are. If we make our decisions based on how we would like it to be, we make wrongs assumptions. But if we make decisions based on truth, we make good decisions.

Now, concerning the ongoing debate on migration. We have come some way. My basic idea about differentiating the migrants in refugees and economic migrants will grant a huge relief in the handling of the migrant flow. There is nothing illegal or wrong in protecting ones nation or liga against people who wish to wander and settle on its territory.

This flow will, most probably, increase in the following years, due to a falling population in Europe and a burgeoning population in Africa and the Middle East.

There are no easy solutions to this problem, and the level of security will have to be beefed up seriously. It will be bloody, and keep up getting more bloody. We are entering a phase in human history where the green earth cannot sustain its humans, and as Darwin correctly theorised, the strong will subdue the weak.

We have a good relationship to all the nations that are in trouble, and we can help, but there is only so much we can do. It will be devastating, and the wars that will ravage the African continent will be severe. It will be a human catastrophe, that cannot be solved by Europe. We can do all we can to help, but we cannot save Africa.

The other thing we have to realise is the fact, that the main problem with the migrants that are coming now, is the fact that they are Muslim. I like Muslims, not the IS, but apart from that, I like Muslims.

But, there is a history of conflict and warfare in Europe between the Muslim countries and European countries. This conflict goes all the way back to the beginning of Islam, and has been going on for 1500 years.

This means, that the conflict has very deep roots. The flow of Muslim migrants will feed into the animosity that has been historically, and is wakening old conflicts.

In Poland they remember their national hero Jan III Sobieski who defeated the ottoman invasion in Vienna, in Hungary the war is all too close not to remember. At the Muslim side, it is the same. Old wounds ripped up because we thought that all conflict was over, and we could just relax and smoke a joint. Guess what, we were wrong.

So far, the conflict has been guided into a fight between democracy and Islam, hence the fight against Islamic state. But who knows what will happen in the future. The Vikings are on the rise, because we are the basic answer to the Muslim migration. I have friends with a deep belief in the old gods, and if they truly are let loose, we will have a war so fierce that the hundred year war was a picnic in the Picadilly. Two sacrificing war religions in each others teeth, that will call for an apocalypse.

My responsibility is to the vikings, so I will follow them, but I truly hope, that we do not have to come so far.

But, all in all, all the talk about moving around refugees does not work due simply to the fact, that they will, voluntary or involuntarily feed into this apocalyptic conflict.

We need to defuse that conflict before it goes off.

This we do by, at the one hand, fighting and repatriating IS warriors on European ground, and at the other hand, giving the Muslim refugees serious help in the vicinity of their homeland. The help should not be halfhearted or lack resources, we should really help.

I know that these things are hard to face, but we need to face them with an honest and open heart, to defuse the the conflicts that we see coming.

Hard lessons and hard measures. But if we do nothing, the Ragnarok coming will be so terrible, that we have never seen anything like it. It will change the world into a very dark and sinister place.

G-d bless the will to be honest in a difficult situation.

There is a lot of discussion going on in the wake of the tsunami of refugees in Europe. As mr. Putin have said; it is not something we should be surprised about. If you invite people, well, then they tend to come.

The problem is just, that the entire Schengen system has made it possible for migrants to wander unhindered to where they want, giving the southern European countries a motive to let them wander on, and the northern european countries a bit of a headache. In this situation we all discuss, no rather we fight about the moral high ground. Left versus right.

Now there is however one solution that has not been tested so far. What about a compromise?

A compromise is a difficult thing, each side needs to feel that it has won an equal share of the fight. Therefor intelligent diplomacy must be used to make both sides feel and see that they have exactly the right share of the deal.

This works if you do it with truth. As in the discussion about the fight against radical islam. The compromise is, that only holy warriors who fight for an islamic state are enemies of the West and East now, hence the fight against Islamic state. Muslims who are not into the fight against democracy for an Islamic state are friends, and should be helped and protected. Hence the cooperation with his highness mr Al-Sisi and Saudi Arabia.

In the peace deal we are trying to forge in the Middle East, it is the same. The Gaza strip palestinians are not exactly examples of moral fortitude, and we cannot make deals with them. But the Iranians however are listening and are following us on the path of peace. Again a compromise.

If we look at the situation in Europe, where do we then find the compromise here?

At one hand, we have seen many refugees who are extremely aggressive, and we already have a lot of problems with Islamic extremists in Europe. These are not wanting our help, but are seeking to destroy our existence. We however also see people who are truly in need of our help, and these we should help. The fact of the matter however is, that those who are most in need are close to the countries where they come from. So a focus on the vicinity of the warring countries would actually help the most.

Compromises are what leads to peace, idealism without compromise is what leads to war. If we are uncompromising of our ideals and never want to stop, but stubbornly continue our fight for what we think is right, war comes. If we however look at things as they are, and fight the evil and support the good, we will win peace.

G-d bless the will to be intelligent and wise in the face of a ongoing crisis.

It is a bit of a problem if we are controlled too much by the dark side of media. Just because the media are trying to rule by using emotional images, we should not heed to this kind of mob rule, because that is really all it is. There is not much reflection in a picture. Yes, it is a terrible picture, yes, the conflict is spiralling out of control, yes the migration is a humane catastrophe.

But it is bit more complicated than just a picture, and leaving no room for an intelligent solution, will just make things worse.

In this way Europe will not be an ideal or a place to respect, if mobrule is the rule of the day. I am not saying, that we should curb the freedom of speech, on contrary, I believe that we should strengthen the ability to talk freely.

But our media are so far from what is was supposed to be in the beginning; a vehicle for rational thought and enlightenment. It has been degraded into a tool of propaganda, that is one way tool of information that has no base in truth.

The truth is, that the migration is mainly young men, and they are fleeing poverty. Those who flee the war are actually in relative peace in and around the country of war, but just extremely poor due to the terrible situation in the refugee camps.

This we off cause have a responsibility to do something about, but who says that it should be welcoming all refugees in Europe for a permanent settlement?

If Europe had the ability and economic room to house all refugees, well we should, but a more fair distribution and a nonpermanent solution would be better, because Europe is right now reeling from the impact of refugees, and falling apart. This is not good either.

Finding a balanced solution, where all are better off, is the better deal.

In this situation where media is reduced to propaganda, all rationality is showed out of the window, and that is a bad thing.

G-d bless the will to be true.

There is one country that, above all, has to face its own demons. Germany. As it annihilated most of the Jews just sixty years ago, this crime against us Jews, is hard to forgive. But, this does not, at the other hand, justify the elimination of Germans. I do not think that it will come to that, but with the current pressure on the German system, Germany may lose the sway and control over its territory. Leaving Germans at the mercy of a war that will compare very much to the last one. Just more savage and in the street.

There is still time to fix the problem within a humane frame, and without too much violence. But the clock is ticking, and Angela Merkel needs to act.

Face it, there is no such thing as more distribution of migrants, it will not happen. My plan is, at best, a very long shot. A lot of things has to work to make it function, but at least, it is a fair chance.

But we need to act, now. Call the UN, put pressure on them to set the plan in motion. At the meanwhile, I will try and pressure where I can.

If the UN accepts the plan, we can, with their blessing, make it work. There will be force involved, because many of the people who are migrating will be unhappy with the arrangement. So we need to figure out a way to do it with the acceptance and the cooperation of all nations involved. If someone comes from Somalia, we need to work with the Somalian government to arrange the transfer or sending of Somalian citizens who are illegally on German territory or other European ground. Again, it has to be done with utmost care, and with respect for all the human rights of the refugees.

It also has to be an open process, no lies, no cover up. We need to do this right from the beginning, explain what we are doing, and how we are doing it. Make it transparent and in coordination with all international bodies and relevant authorities.

Do this, and we have a chance to defuse the situation, but it will be extremely difficult, and close to mission impossible. But, we have been there before, and with the right skills and an honest heart, it can be done.

G-d bless Germany, and may she live long and strong.

The discussion on the migrant crisis is ongoing. Look at it this way, there is only one serious solution right now. That is the rise of European sponsored nations in the Middle East.

I understand, that the European Union and Germany is fighting for a more fair dissipation between the entire European continent of refugees.

Simply because this cannot work in many European countries. Take Sweden, here the Sweden democrats is now the largest party in the Swedish parliament because they are against the migration plans of the ruling elite. The national political systems simply cannot afford it.

So, we need another solution, and here my solution is really the only humanistic solution.

It involves me at the helm, and I understand, that the rulers are a bit reluctant to give me all that power. But, at the other hand, look at what I have done in the last five years, ever since I met my fair wife and got my own family. It has been constructive and humane. You grow up. When you are young you are rebellious, when you grow older you mature.

So, I really implore you to make the necessary arrangements. We are looking at a crisis that is so destructive, that we need to solve it. Babies are dying in the waters, and we need to stop it.

G-d bless the will to be honest in a difficult situation.

Tackling the migrant crisis is extremely difficult, especially for Germany with its history of persecuting the Jews. Not helping refugees will call back all those years where the Jews were under fire, the Shoa.

Now, I like Germany. I have been there many, many times, especially with my samba dancing group. In fact I feel I know Germany. I am not naiv, I have also heard Germans who were asking themselves why Denmark was not a part of Germany.

At the other hand, many Eastern Germans love Danes for their peacefulness during the cold war, with our hygge and Olsen Banden.

But, at the end, finding a solution to the migrant problem hold one major obstacle; it has to be an ethical solution.

This is extremely difficult, because moving around people in need is a bad thing to do.

If we, however, look at my proposal, it takes this problem under consideration. The main problem of the refugees are three. One, they need shelter, two they need medical treatment, three, they need education and addition of skills. After they have gained that, they need to be able to make a future.

The problem with the refugees, however, is the fact, that the refugees that come to Europe are not the weak refugees. To get so far, you need a lot of ressourcer; connections, money, physical health. I have not, for one, seen a refugee in Denmark that were not in the best of health. So, what about all those copts, Yazidi and Christian Assyrians and many other minorities that are weak and under fire. How do they cope? The answer is; they do not. They do not cope, they perish. So while we discuss all the refugees in Europe, the weak refugees die.

So morally, this is lopsided. Therefor, we need to get close to where the wars are, and make nations there. This will ensure that the weak refugees will be sheltered. It also makes an ethical solution to the problem itself. Then it will not just be a matter of moving people around. It will be a matter of actually helping those in need, and giving those not so much in need a better future, but not just in Europe. It will also ensure, that the skills we give them, can be used in their home country, where they much more needed to rebuild the countries when the war is over. Good arguments all.

Then there is the questions about the price tag. Look at it this way. The migrants in Europe already are extremely expensive. If they are moved to the Middle East. They will be cheaper. Because housing, education and so on is much cheaper in the Middle East.

The thing is; the solution should involve serious involvement by the Europeans. We should not just set up camps, but make nations they could get by in. When the crisis they run away from, we can slowly migrate the project back to their country, in effect giving the refugees a wealthfarestate, trained civil servants and trained security personell. In this way, we would actually help in the area.

Concerning the Syrian war, we had a part in doing it. It was, originally a part of the Arab spring, that went wrong. So we have responsibility.

G-d bless the will to think clear and make new moves.

Concerning the crisis of migration, I think it is a good idea to take a step back, and look at things with calm.

I have just finished the stoic work of the Roman Seneca about peace of mind. I think it has a number of principles we can use to tackle the crisis.

First of all, we need to take it calm. The current crisis is spinning out of control, and the fall of the European Union is imminent. If Schengen falls, the Union is doomed. It has been coming for many years, and we are reasonably prepared. At least in Northern Europe, and in Middle Europe, we have strengthened the democratic core of the nations, and in south it is a bit less destructive to loose the strong arm of the Union, perhaps even a relief.

Looking at the crisis specifically, we need to see it as it is. Instead of taking sides in the debate for and against the migration. We need to look at it calm, and tackle it with precision and virtue. We cannot choose sides, but do what is necessary, with the least amount of suffering to all sides.

Since most of the migrants are not refugees, we need to send them back to their home country. Simply and with as little fuss as possible. It is not illegal, there are no rules we break, and then we should just do it. This will require ressources allocated from the military, and they should deployed with grace and as little personal threat as possible.

Concerning the refugees, we need to make the nations I have discussed. This will be quite a bit harder, but can be possible, if I am at the helm. This is, however necessary, because it will need quite a bit of skill in handling Middle Easterners, something only I can do, because I am the only one who knows enough about the culture, and has the necessary experience.

If the UN is capable of taking care of the logistics, and the West is prepared to pay, we can do it. But we need to move fast and act fast. There is no time to lose, and it will take a while to set up.

G-d bless the will of the soft hearted person, using his skills to defuse quite a problem.

I may have got an opening in my quest to find a decent job, that may actually make it possible for me to guarantee my service to the international agreement in the Iran deal.

To make it work in the long run, I need to be more than just a gifted blogger boheme, and actually have a living to underpin my work.

Through the order of st. John, where I happen to be a commander, my immediate superior knight has put in a word in UNDP to make it possible for me to work on my ideas on solving the migrant crisis in Europe.

This is quite good, if this works, I can work on guaranteeing the Iran deal, and help solve the European migrant crisis.

If anyone reads this, and can get word to the UN, specifically Mette Fjelland in UNDP, please do so, it will be a huge favour, and I will be able to lift my work from a hobby to a profession. Hobby work is ok, if it does not entail so much responsibility, but the Iran deal is above hobby status.

Please, if anyone, especially in the US administration wish for this deal to come clear and work. Help me get my things together, and make it happen. Please, and thank you.

G-d bless that helping hand.

Finding G-d goes through many paths. It can be contemplation, intellectual research, sacrifice og prayer. But there is one path, I believe we should prioritize and not forget that, instantly, gives us something, not only spiritually, but also just for our joy, the aim of art; beauty.

We, as conservatives, strive, as always for a rebirth of the ancient traditions. Not that these traditions cannot change in face of reality, but development should be done through the marriage of ancient principles with the world we are living in. Through understanding what used to be ideas of worth and quality in the light of present day. This is truly renaissance, as I see it. Socrates had his ideas about free speech thousands of years ago, but today we try and understand them in the light of the challenges we are met with.

So what about renaissance today? Art and beauty are sought through millennia, thousands and thousands of years. As realized in innumerable edifices around the world. Things that morons and uncivilized people destroy as in Iraq and Palmyra today.

This strife between beauty and barbarity should not drag us down on the level of the barbarians, but lift us to strife for more beauty, not less.

What is beauty really? To answer this question, we, off cause, have to see it in an Egyptian light. Most of the ideas behind what we today know as aestethics or ideas of beauty, are renaissance ideas. That is platonic ideas realized in, especially, the Italian renaissance. Add to this Vitruvius, a Roman, we can all see what it points to; Pythagoras.

Pythagoras was the Greek that, as Plato, had had a long stay in the classical Egyptian society, before et actually fell to Alexander the Great. That is, before it got conquered, and slowly went into decline.

At the time, Egypt was the true land of wonder and magic. It held numerous secrets, that we relay today through, among other sources; the bible, and especially the founder of Judaism truly; Moses.

Anyway, Pythagoras really siphoned a lot of secrets from his stay in Egypt, among them the basic of musical theory, and, I believe, of beauty itself.

Beauty is, according to Egyptian lore; the science of geometry. We can see it in the Egyptian pyramids; perfect geometrical structures.

But not only in architecture do we find geometry, we also find it in painting, where Leornado da Vinci realized the mathematical principle behind the figure of Mona Lisa. The Egyptians had developed a kind of map of the body, that they used to make their statues. This lore was learned and used by the Romans in their statue making, among other things, making statues as Michelangelo did. The statue of David, being one of the most famous.

This is truly what is threatened by Islamic State, this search for beauty and eloquence. Islamic state are harbingers of evil and chaos, and they are therefor the definition of ugly and depraved, as they show in defiling ancient sites of beauty. What a shame for mankind, having these rural depravities having sway over the inheritance of man. Barbarity and stupidity, once more roll over our shores, smashing beauty, destroying our civilization from within.

We should remember this, when we fight these barbarians, they are here to quell beauty as well as honesty and light.

G-d bless our saviour; Moses.

I am an academic, but not one of the usual ones. Usually academics are in churches, universities or other schools. Working with education and research that is to the good of the society.

Since our societies are on a very downward course, these days it is difficult to be in a university. The academic level is very low, the strings attached is manyfold, and you end up pushing things around and not really making any progress.

I realized this at the beginning of my career, so I chose to be independent.

The good thing about that, is the possibility to go your own ways, and for society, this is extremely vital, because a society needs new ideas to flourish.

But the backside of the coin is the fact, that it has become increasingly difficult for me to relate to all the other academic life. I am kind of a wild thing, living in the woods, an unpolished diamond, that have difficulty when dragged into the halls of academia again.

I realize this, after reflecting on my visit to Oxford. Honestly, it was a thrill, and I did make a good friend, so for that it was ok. But as for acceptance in the academic world, it was a true disaster.

I did everything wrong. I fought too much with my things, instead of just relaxing, I aimed too high, so that noone really understood what I wanted, and I could not relax.

But, hey, this was my first meeting with the university world in ten years or more. The last time I was in a university, if one could call it that, was when I was a lowly assistant, at the very bottom rung of the system. The professors scolded me on that occasion, so much that it is still impossible for me to have an academic career here in Denmark.

I feel like a sailor, coming ashore after a long voyage. All the landlubbers are scribbling away in languages that I do not care for, or understand.

Because out here on the sea, is where we tell yarns and meet the wrath of the sea.

These are the things I write about. The clashes of civilization, the murder of my friends, and the tall waves of cultures pounding each other.

And when I get ashore, I feel like a man out of my real element. I feel lost and do not really know how to behave. Not that I do not like the modern luxuries of the city and the populated life. I am just to rough at the edges to really enjoy it.

If academia wants me to a part of it, not that they should, but if they want, they should basically accept my stupid mannerisms, and my lack of eloquence.

I have wisdom, won in harsh sailing here at the open sea, this I try to give on to others. But I do not understand all the finer ways of academia anymore, so if you want to work with me, understand my predicament and quality.

G-d bless the will of the beautiful light of the academies.

You can attack the idea of marriage and family from different points of view. You can do it from the point of st. Augustin, as I did with the posting of faith, hope and love. You can do it in a Platonic view, as I did in my writings on the dialogue Meno, or you can do it in an existentialistic view. That is Kierkegaard.

Kierkegaard was a little special, because he never really married. He had this life long infatuation with this beautiful girl Regine. In a very Goethiean way, that is artistically in love with someone he could not get, he saw love and marriage as an ideal that was unattainable.

But, at the other hand, the attainableness is different in real life. I mean, we have to be married and get kids, right.

Kierkegaard is really the psychological Christian philosopher. He talks about angst and focuses a lot on the inner mechanisms of the soul.

This is good in a modern world, because psychology is all over. But I also think, that this is really the problem of the modern world. We listen too much to psychology, and too little to philosophy. Kierkegaard is a bridge in this regard.

Basically he aims, as all theologians, for love. But opposed to psychologists, he believes that there is a G-d beneath the equation. So, all he sees in his analysis of the mind is always with the aim of reaching spiritual fulfillment.

One of the principles that really made sense to me, reading Kierkegaard, was his ideas of barriers. A lot of us are living in shells. These shells are due to mistreatment, and are really scars. If we grow up in a very harsh environment, as we do here in Scandinavia, we get calloused and retract into ourselves. This leaves us egoistic and uncaring.

This coldness we give on to our children, and we end up in a cycle of harshness and toughness.

This may be good in war, but in family matters it is not good. This is why we need to be open.

Openess is an ability to live without our psychological defenses up all the time. But, then again, to be open in a family, you also need to be careful with your wife. Because how can she remain open, if you do not respect her?

This leads to idea of respect as a ground virtue of marriage. As Løgstrup also say; we carry each other. If I choose to step aside and do my own thing, my wife will fall. If she and I choose to carry each other, sacrifice ourselves in the process, helping each other, work as one, then life will work in the end.

It is, in a Scandinavian perspective at least, an eternal fight for sustenance and joy. A difficult thing i a cold country, but what we have to do nonetheless. The salvation here lies in sacrifice for your loved ones. Carry your kids and your wife on your broad shoulders. Shelter them when the rain comes, and build a safe house for them to life in, and then you may call yourself a man.

G-d bless the wisdom of Kierkegaard.

It is difficult to be true in politics. All the pressure, all the interests that is vested in your person and what you do. Lobbyism or journalism is always there to try set their agenda, not your agenda. True friendship is very, very rare, and almost no one is clean.

This is truly the root cause of the problem in the West. We have lost our dignity and virtue, and is prone to accept things, if there is a pay check at the other end.

So what do we really do to counter this lure of democracy, the weakness of democracy?

I am reading Senece these days, I stumbled upon him yesterday in a free public library. He is this old and wise Roman praetor and consule.

In his work “On peace of mind”, he has a lot of good advice. First of all, we have to see it for what it is. All the people who wants something from us, they are in their business. It is not that they are not good for something, but we have to be realistic about their aims and their background.

But they are incredibly annoying, and therefor we need to able to have peace somewhere. Seneca talks about a simple place in the countryside, where he can redraw to, and find his peace of mind again. Then he talks about elation in opposition to gloom and doom. He says, that peace of mind is in the middle. To keep away from too much ravening, and too much depression.

This is a stoic idea, that is an idea that originally came from Zeno, a Phoenician, and should be seen in this context. It is not a truly original Roman idea, but actually from one of its competitors. Rome has always been good at taking in new ideas and make it its own.

Anyway, virtue, that is really at the core of this discussion, is what it is about. We have to be honest and simple in what we do. Listen to the public, and try and understand their needs.

If we live a simple live, we are not as prone to be lured into the fallacy of materialism. We are not as easily seduced by money or flatter, but can continue being what it is all about; being servants to the public.

G-d bless the will to be simple and honest in the face of seduction and too much fuss.

The world is both like an oyster and on a path to hell. At one end, we have all the possibilities of a new world. At the other hand, we have the hell that is upon us with Islamic State. It is like an endless void blistering with light. Finding those lights, and navigating the sea is what will get us to those lights and shed the fear and the problems of the darkness and the endless sucking material seductive apocalypse.

Talking about apocalypse. Let me please present you with my ideas of solving of the current migration crisis in Europe.

First of all, we need to see this challenge in an international light. We know, that Africa is confronted with some of the same challenges that Europe is confronted with. And though Africa thinks we do not see them, please reconsider. We do; we are listening to the Copts and the Assyrians and though Africa has truly fundamental differences, we are also very much on the same boat.

What Africa confronts right now, is islamic extremism. We have seen it in many of the middle african countries. Scourges of the earth as Boko Haram are giving war to african countries, and we have helped.

The same development is seen in Europe. A few days ago heroic americans fought down an islamic terrorist in France. So it is the same problem just on different continents. But as we are much stronger militarily in Europe, sometimes africans need our help. We help, and we are making friends in the process. Because of all the friends the Africans may have, the Europeans are the most likely to come to aid, because we are sharing challenges. But, this also includes a less harsh treatment of the European descendants in Africa. We cannot continue the ethnic cleansing of European farmers in Africa, not if we are to stand in unison against the islamists.

Talking about Europe, we are facing a dilemma. At one hand, we need to be humane towards the refugees and immigrants that seek shelter in Europe, at the other hand, we need to tackle the extremist who are among the immigrants. It is a dilemma.

In a dilemma, we need to think things through to find a solution. Not doing anything is a huge problem, because we will end up being swallowed by islamist fighters. Shoving all migrants into boats and the sinking the boats as the European Union is doing now, is simply inhumane.

Read more…

Sometimes antisemitism takes its strangest forms, and the jews targeted can be anything. This time it was a musician, one of my favourites in fact.

He courageously went on singing with his heart about Jerusalem in the face of anger and ridicule. Will it ever stop? No, but as always, there are courageous Jews who get up and do what they do, just because otherwise would be cowardice.

Video:

http://bcove.me/w0vgaqju

Reading the exquisite platonic dialogue Meno, I stumbled upon a principle, that may enlighten the debate about evil and good in our current societies, and may give us an inkling as to why the Islamic State has such stupendous success.

According to Plato, or Socrates, evil is the effect of stupidity or lack of knowledge. As a person gets wiser the person also gets less prone to evil.

This is a good reflection of IS I would say. Most of its combatant are gang members from different European and other countries. Not the most enlightened people.

These people then tend to follow the simple patterns and the easy answers. This is, again, what propels the forward to do evil deeds. Because the simple answers paint the brutes into a world with simple ideas.

If you are not muslim, you are an enemy. What a simple view of the world. It is easy to comprehend, you do not have to think much, just act according to this flawed, but simple logic.

This, at the other hand, gives an answer to the problem of eliminating the scourge to some extent; education.

G-d bless the will to be complex and humble in the face of knowledge.

It seems to me, a kind of a “New conservatism” has begun to emerge. As we have left the Thatcherian concepts of solely free market, and the fight against Communism, we are now entering a phase of a more balanced Smithsonian economic philosophy, where national production is balanced with free market theory. This in practice strengthens the economic base of the nation, as well as secures a flow of products worldwide. To support and secure this system however, we still need to have a look on economies that cheats at the weight by copying our products and our military secrets. In order to make a fair and level playing ground, R&D should be protected and support the nation it is produced in, otherwise it makes the entire structure lopsided. In order to have a Smithsonian system up and running, we need the law to function in all the nations participating. As a consequence, certain nations has to be cut off the system, unless these nations start playing on the same field as everybody else.

Looking at the fight against islamism. We can see, that this challenge is almost tearing at least Europe apart. Islamism has got a firm hold in London, Paris, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Rotterdam, Berlin and many other European cities. Added to the problem with a huge influx of migrants that seem to marry the ideas when they come to the new country, instead of embracing democracy and free speech, we have a problem indeed. A problem that needs tackling with the armed wing of the state. That is the fact of the day.

As a strange mix of events, the events have mixed jihadi ideals with cold war methods. So they are BOTH waging war on the street, taking war booty and other archaic ideas, AND infiltrating cultural life. This creates a strange situation where musicians, that is islamist singers like Jihadi John are entering IS. Strange indeed. But we need to remember, that this advesary is not stupid, and it is all new. So we need to rethink our strategies.

At the end, it all comes down to that Oxfordian spirit. That, dugged, stubborn, self-sacrificing continuation of the fight against the dark lord. Because at the end of the day, that is what we are fighting. The dark lord and his evil minions, happy to divulge in rape and cutting off heads as he grins his lopsided grin.

That and then our own darkness, as people seem to wish to hide his crime. As this is apparent, we realize what we are; we are the fighters of light, in the service of spirit.

G-d bless the will of the creator, as he guides us to confront that of his advisories.

I remember, I had this dream before the last Gazan war. It was terrible, in short it was a nigthmare about the fall of the West. At that time, Israel was not, except for mr. Netanyahu, cognizable about the threat the last Gazan war was to the entire West, it was a turning point. We won, this is now clear. Ok, there is still a threat, but basically with the advent of IS, it has disappeared. Hamas is not longer a threat to Israel, because IS eclipses it. In this way, there is actually peace with Gaza. We did it. The strategy to pull out as IS was on the rise, sacrificed the immediate victory, but gained the long term goal; to make peace.

There is still the threat of Iran, I realize, that it is not over. And I do not know whether there is any substance to the claims that they are fooling us, but until the opposite is proved, we must believe that they actually wish to join the international opposition to IS, and give Islam another face and content than what IS wish it to have.

Now these are macrostrategic considerations, that seem to fall on deaf ears in Israel. I understand, the feeling of being surrounded and always have to be on the alert for more or less three thousand years, if not more, is a bitch, if you will excuse my language.

Now, looking at Europe, my machinations are almost bearing fruit. I know it seems a little sinister to be so strategic, but to fight evil, you have to be strategic, because he is. You have to be steadfast and honest, look through his schemes and develop long term strategic plans.

One of the goals was to build an alternative to the EU, because it was doomed to fall. I did not know how it would be, but it seems to me, that it is a more loose federation. I think most Europeans like the free market and collaboration on different areas, but the straightjacket it has become is alienating many, if not all Europeans. The alliance with the Islamists, is not a good idea either.

From Greece to the UK, the opposition is now so strong, that things have to change. As Germany is also enveloped in pressure from the grassroots, at least Schengen have to go. The EU has to face this, the rampant violence and chaos it has resulted in, will tear entire Europe down. It has to stop immediately.

Then there is a development that I did not really anticipate, but now is coming to bears as well. If Europe is healthy, and progressing, it will pull the former colonies with it. This is not a arrogant perspective, I have sacrificed myself for the US and also I have had a good impact, through the current pope of South America. But as we, in Europe somehow get our bearings again, the positive ideas are sucked up and used not only by Europe, but also of all of those who we gave birth to. And, as I see it, giving something who are like you, is not such a bad thing after all.

Read more…

I think I know why Meno was such an excellent choice for a renewed discussion of what family really is. It is because it still young in its conception. Plato was in his early works very much influenced by Socrates, and yet not so young again in Meno. So the frame of the more mature Plato shines through in a lot of the principles and ideas of Meno.

If you want to have your mental health restored, reading Plato is always a good way to do it. I kind of puts things in perspective, and you get a grip of what is right and wrong. Add to this the ever present spirit of Socrates, that is a humble genius, that had the ability to look at things afresh, and always with interest.

I have pondered a bit on with Meno, and actually finished the dialogue, and several things can be taken from this eminently inspiring text.

Plato claims, that virtue is knowledge. We talk about the seven deadly sins and the seven heavenly virtues. But the fact that there is knowledge in each of the principles, we should always remember. A virtue is not a formal principle, it is a everchanging principle that will change according to the situation. In each family, the principle off cause hold some basic lore, but each of us must find our own path.

Finding the content of the virtues is however where the church can help. Take courage. What is it to be courageous in a family? What is it to be faithfull? What is it to be honest? What is it to be loyal? What is it to show solidarity?

The pick and choose among the virtues is an important work, and one that good pastors can do. It also offers true value to all the broken families, as well as the good ones.

It however reflects back on the church, because, we cannot advice people to be honest and true, if we are not that ourselves. It is actually not easy, but will demand faith and work.

Plato ends up saying that you can have science, that is rigorously analyzed knowledge, and you can have good opinion. That is poets and leaders just know what to do, but cannot tell why they do it. That is the difference between theory and practice.

To advice families, and to help them find a beautiful path, they need to do things, that is practice, but we only have theory. So we need to mix these two things. Look a best practices, but at the other hand, apply theory. There is a lot of interesting work to be done at the universities, to bolster and support a good development for all who are in trouble and need our support.

Look at it this way; the family as in institution has been without much support in many years, as it gets more and more support, from beneath we will build the realm of G-d. In each little unity we will try and spread the love of spirit and create a little world, as we came from.

Below as above.

G-d bless the wisdom of Plato.

I have pondered a little over the ethical frame of the synod. Having made the idea, with certain motives as to why we should move on making the family the vehicle of joy and rejuvenation, we still lack a serious framework to work with. With respect to all the ideas out there.

I have read a bit in the platonic dialogue Meno. Partly because it is pretty simple, and partly because it targets the discussion of virtue. That is what virtue is, and how we may use virtue as a guiding light.

First of all, as always when we read Plato, we are struck by the simpleness and humility of Socrates. He is never full of himself, and always just inquiring into the mysteries of the universe. We should remember this, I think. Not to be full of ourselves and have all the answers at the ready. But still remember the humility of the inquirer. Be open to new avenues of thought, and not be arrogant.

The second thing that struck me with the dialogue is the fact that Socrates tells us, that there is virtue connected to different phases of life, and gender. What is courageous of a woman is not necessarily courageous of a man or a child. While as the mother is the housekeeper and keeper of the economy, the man must protect the families interest. Sometimes it is different. In other words, we should have an eye out for the fact, that some virtues are more suited to some phases of life, other to other phases of life. What is however important is the fact, that these virtues should lead to a better life, not a worse life.

Tolstoy tells us, that all happy families are alike, and all unhappy families are different. To this truth is connected a utopian quest. If there is such a blueprint of the happy family, it must be possible to actually find it. Instead of only philosophizing about it, we could actually find empirical data, find some good families, see how they work, and try to understand why they work.

Kierkegaard talks about heritage sin. That is, you inherit the sins of your father. If your father was a thief, there is a good chance you will end up a thief yourself. This evil circle is something the church must work with. It will not happen overnight, but there are a lot of families in the poor area, who are in need of guidance and help. Sometimes education will help, sometimes just the eucharist will be enough. But shepherds should get out of the comfort-zone and visit there where no one else would visit, to care for those in need. Among the thieves and the crooked lies the most difficult task. In this area the faith of the father is truly tested. I know, I am in one of those jobs here in Denmark. But we need, in this situation, to have faith, and remain ethical, never abandon our cause.

It all comes down to a single virtue, or a collective virtue as Aristotle say. He say that this single virtue, the virtue of the virtues is joy and happiness. I believe, that Plato has a point in the fact, that justice is a part of this virtue. You cannot be happy if you live in sin. But most important is the fact, that in order to have hope, you need faith, faith in love and thereby G-d.

G-d bless the seeker for truth.

In the upcoming synod I think, humbly, that we need to envelop the entire process in a theological frame, that truly lifts the entire religious discourse. Before I had the pleasure to visit the discourse, ideas as intelligent design and the like was really the sharp spearhead of moderne theology, but the problem was; it was not accepted by the layman or the modern media. So, it lived a life of ridicule and nonacceptance by mainstream. This has changed with my theology, or rather the theology of Anaxagoras. Why? Because people take it serious. The sincere attempt to meet modern scientists and natural science is seen as something new and viable. Ok, I have not been seriously criticized by international natural scientists, only some of my friends here in Denmark who are good, but not on an international level. But even they accept the premise and are not always in agreement, and very critical, but understand the language, the ideas and sees it as a relevant partner.

The process that began with the reformation has finally begun to revert, and while as we have had five hundred years of separation between mainstream society and theology, we now see the opposite reaction. I believe that his eminent pope Francis is a representative of this development. It has yet to truly materialize in the protestant world. But there are attempts, though not successful as of yet. But we will get there with a little patience and hard work. We also need the wise anglican bishop of Cantebury to reach out again. I am not saying this for my own benefit, but because YOU need it. We cannot stop here, we need to plow on and safe Oxford. The shire requires it. If not put in motion by his emince, perhaps other denizens of the proud town could put something in motion. You need me more than you know, but need to open the door I cannot do it myself.

In Denmark there are little lights shining, and hopefully they will get brighter. Not to mention that Germany seems to, after all, want the Danish connection strengthened. I am here, to save and fight along all the angels of Germany.

Looking at the theology itself. I think we need to see it in a wider perspective. Christianity began as a superstructure of the theology of the Roman empire. In Rome ideas from ancient Persia, Egypt and of cause Israel was welded together into a new ideology. In this construct one element was conspicuously missing, the philosophy of the etruscans and their ideas of discipline. I have recommended these principles to reemerge to some extent in Rome, after all, this was what Rome was built upon. Especially in relation to money and other immoral degrees. It helped, and his eminence Francis has been fast cleaning up the mess, and Roman imperator would have done.

Then comes the dark ages where Plato was really the crux of Christian theology. I have pondered quite a bit about this, off cause. I read Plato very much, and even have a proposition as to a dialogue that could be a starting point for the synod to use. I have to read a little more before I truly recommend it. But as you see on the fresco here on top of the page. Plato in the middle points upwards, to the heaven. This is not by coincidence, he was the more spiritual of the pair Aristotle and Plato. Aristotle points downwards.

Read more…

Concerning the upcoming synod the family. I think, that it is very important to understand this in a metaphysical light.

As in the ancient Egyptian temples, what we do, we do it to reflect the existence of G-d. Prayer was originally such a thing. To emulate and to get closer to G-d, the priest there tried to emulate the world of spirit.

The same is the idea of the family, as I understand it, in the light of the “heretic king”, Akhenaten. That is the founder of the monotheistic religions. He sat there, with his little daughter on his lap, and held a loving hand to his spouse. Why? What can we envision this early Moses to do in his philosophy? Perhaps he, as the priests emulated the heavenly kingdom on earth.

Spirit is love, it is interconnected and boundless. When we step into this world, we are met with loneliness. We are isolated within each of our little shells. The family is a remedy to this. We have our children that we truly love, our aunts and uncles whom we also love. This is how it is in the realm of G-d.

So in a sense, the basic idea of a family is more than just a place for ethics. Ethics is important, so that we may share our feelings and our daily bread. But we must, as I see it, in the very original sense of the idea of the family, see love at the heart of this institution. Remember this when we care for our little ones, protect them, share our life with them. We do this to get closer to all our spiritual selfs.

G-d bless the will to understand and love.

There has been talking about using the British forces and some kind of pedagogical instrument to sway young Muslims over in the direction of the crown. Listen, this is folly. Not all Muslims are extremists, but you need a wing of the government that you can rely on hundred percent. We may soon see a showdown in Europe against IS and the Moslem Brotherhood, and we need the forces ready.

G-d bless the wisdom of the ancients. They would not take chances like this.

I believe we have come to at point, where we can safely say, that the West will prevail. Before Obama, there was serious doubt about the outcome, and there was a very real possibility, that the entire structure of the West, or rather the remaining structure of the British empire would collapse. That is the U.S., Australia, New Zealand and what remains of power in the Asian sea. With the intellectual turn around made first by Barack Obama and now by David Cameron, we are not standing by the edge of doom anymore, but are slowly progressing along a line of consolidation and progress. You can see it in the expanding role UK is playing worldwide and in the string of successes Barack Obama has had in his tenure. As ACDC would have said, ITS ROCK! Our values are respected again, we are in an economic balance again. Not so much the UK, still a lot of hurdles to get over, but we are getting there. If you add to this the progress of South America, that is truly the positive result of his eminence pope Francis, basically European culture is getting fit and working its way out of the misery it was in.

So we the are entering a phase of consolidation. The groundwork has been done, and we need to strengthen the institutions and ideological work that is the bone and marrow of our work.

This process however is not a fast process, it will take hundreds and hundreds of years and will end up another phase of our humanitarian development reaching for progress and G-d.

When we had the war between the Catholics and Protestants, that defined the 15′ century and 16′ century, it started with a bang, and went on for almost two hundred years. Still goes on in a way, especially in England, where it was never really settled. But, this is how human development goes, it starts with a revolution, and then carries on for hundreds and hundreds of years.

I will be the Voltaire, Barack will be the Napoleon.

What we are looking at however is a grinding war between the different perspectives, especially the war against IS will be a long one, they are good and entrenched. They are pretty locked up in Europe, and we haven’t even begun the process of fighting them on European soil, mainly because the European Union, a relic of the old world order, is very slow at dying, taking away focus from this all important task.

But it will die eventually, the question is just how and when, and how much destruction it will manage to do before it is over.

Remember, to have peace, you have to be able and willing to fight. The question is just with what means and to what ends. It has to be humane and cost the least amount of bloodshed and give the minimum pain to those involved.

Putting our forces in harms way is not something we should do lightly, and the ethical reasons should be sound and honest.

This calls for humility and seriousness.

G-d bless all those who are risking their lives, daily to keep our world safe, democratic and under the guidance of the creator.

It is a bit strange, that wherever I have had the opportunity to try and develop a bit of socioeconomic or spiritual progress, it has brought happiness and light. In Egypt, Israel, the U.S., France, UK. You may call me a hardliner a bigot a moral leftist. But the fact of the matter is, that what the result of my work has been mostly happiness. I made one serious mistake; Libya. Not bringing peace to that country after the Libyan war was a huge mistake. But the intentions were true, and hopefully, mr. Al-sisi can extricate those Islamists out of Libya, so they can be free.

There is one area however, where I have been repeatedly dismissed and outright persecuted. The EU. And look what that has brought them, or where it has lead Europe?

Perhaps I am right?

G-d bless the will of the creator in the interest of man.

It is funny how Americans and Danes like each other. There was a strong friendship between mr. George Bush and our former PM mr. Anders Fogh Jensen, and there is a very strong relationship between my humble person and mr. Barack Obama.

I know we are not perfect, and we always get a lot of criticism. But, I truly believe in those ideas of Change and I do believe that we can bring Hope.

We changed the world, we made it more democratic, we have tried to make a new order in the Middle East, and if we succeed, it will be truly historic.

I am your friend, and will remain so, through thick and thin, come rain come storm. And by that token of honesty and loyalty, I hope our political work will be judged.

Happy birthday mr. President, may you and you family live many, many years in the interest of humanity.

If the consequence of the lifting of the economical bans are the buying of more guns. Well then I will not support the lifting of the bans. 

The idea was to make peace, you will not make peace by using the inflow of money buying up arms. 

I understand that Iran needs to defend itself, but rearming will not lead to immidiate peace, but to more war. 

G-d bless the road to peace. 

Concerning the deal on Iran, we should remember, that the main economic reason was the fact, that it would improve the standard living of those who call themselves Persian.

A strong focus on economical growth should therefore be paramount. It should not be for the elite only, but a wealthfarestate model, that encompasses all, especially the poor should be able to get medical assistance.

A true schooling in the ideology of Iran should be pursued. Not propaganda, but a positive presentation of all those ideas that is the makeup of modern day Iran. From the Hittite to the Muslim. The aim of the creator is for man to live in peace, in brotherhood, not sucked into the material realm. This should be the aim of a renewed focus on spirituality. 

A state where people are working together with no fear and in peace. People call Persia an irrational country, we say no! It will be a model to behold, an ideal society where people live strongly with the creator as their guiding star, in peace with their fellow man be it Jew or gentile. 
G-d bless what Iran can be in a new world of opportunities. 

We are truly heading for at final conclusion in the fight against and for at peace treaty with Iran. Everybody, both for and against are all up in arms, but it seems to me, that Barack is truly winning this time. It is his showpiece of legislation the best part of his second tenure, and what he promised in the beginning when he promised change and hope. Remember?

He promised us a world with less conflict and more peace, where the U.S. had regained its stature after Bush, and on a deeper level, more prosperity to the middle class. This is what he has delivered, and this is what I will try to follow up on, because there will only be one American president for me, and that is Barack Obama. We started this together, and as Steve jobs, that put that little apple on his first computer, and stuck to it to his death, I will continue what Barack and I started.

So in that sense, you could say, that Baracks tenure will not be over … ever because the philosophy we created together will be a part of the heritage of man. As Alexander and Aristotle.

It is not a thing to be swag about or self obsessed, it is something to be humble about and give to the creator.

But, if you could please see it for what it is, all you who are so adamant in opposing it. It would be a boon to us. It is more than just a vain wish of an American president. It is a world changing event, that seeks to make the west and east whole and strong again. The same pillars we all rest on.

With this deal, if it works, the Viking culture will be back as and international peacemaker and leader.

If we loose, something else will take its place, and believe me, that something else will be either killing, enslavings, masscontrol or something worse.

The individual and his preciousness will be forgotten, it will be war and slaughter, and inhumanity.

This is what we fight for, we fight for at better and more happy world. Not to occupy or tyrranize.

G-d bless the will of the humane man.

I have often wondered about the EU. I remember I was on a trip with SIAD ten years ago. We went down to Brussels just after the Mohammad cartoon incidence, and landed there, in front of the Potemkin backdrop, it felt drab and deranged there. But there was one little glimmer of idealism, written in the cold concrete that frames the entrance. It was a dedication to antifacism. A faint echo of the Second World War I suppose, and the fight that still seems to motivate the system. That was against Mussolini and his idealistic hordes. The fight against someone who are absolutely certain about their own supremacy, who disdain democracy and the rule of the people.

Well, what has become of that idea? That democratic idealism.

Well, as in the Spanish civil war, when the diehard volunteers went to Spain to fight that democratic socialist fight, it was betrayed by Stalin. That was the point where the Soviet Union went from the ideas of Lenin and Trotsky, and went all … Facist.

As the volunteers died, hardened betrayed by the cold power grab of Stalin, and his fascination with Hitlers efficiency and “bold” methods.

You sometimes become what you fight. The staring on your enemy, will make you become him.

Now, there is one philosopher the bureaucrats should read. He is called Machiavelli. He is the dark philosopher, because his ideas lead to massslaugther. But he is a good read, because he is right in some ways. He is the ultimately realistic philosopher. He says; cut the crap, if you want to hold and secure a city, you have to be ruthless, otherwise, the descendants of those areas you took will rebel. It is like that.

When you mix people with backgrounds so different as the EU is doing, you will have war between the different ethnic groups. Machiavelli will tell you that, and he is right.

Then the EU bureacrats argue, that the US is a United States. But, hey, it took two devastating wars to finally create the US. First the wars with Mexico, and then the civil war.

Another argument against the European Union.

Bottom line, the EU cannot be created without wars. All historical evidence points to that.

That is exactly the conclusion we can draw from the conflicts the EU has with Greece; it is heading for war. Because, seriously, does anyone believe that the Greek population will accept the humiliation it is given by the EU, in a very warlike manner?

Yes the elites are all fighting like cats and dogs to make their haunted Union, but you cannot fight necessity.

So, the project that stood for democracy, has finally plotted our it’s course, directly against facism.

This is why a fight against it, is as glorious and honorable as the last fight against the first facism. Because the true heir to moussolini, is the European Union.

G-d bless us all, as we brace ourselves for the final stand of the great but flawed project.

Well, I have become a no good, liberal, unrealistic jew, who has no realism and knows nothing. Well, as anyone who have been reading this blog would know, it is the opposite.

But, there is one thing, that is certain. The peace of the Middle East is hinged upon my work now. I do realize, that if I am not able to realize this peace, war will start again.

But basically I do not think that the prospects of a nuclear armed Iran are more probable now than before. It is less. It is like a child, when you continue lecturing them about this and that, and it is, obviously unfair. It will rebel and do the opposite. If you, however, actually try to make a frame, where things are truly fair, and all claims are equally balanced, it will respect you.

I know, that it is, in a way, an unfair reflection, since Iran is one of the most ancient cultures of mankind. But, the pedagogical tools applied by the West have been immature.

Now, Iran feels it has a serious partner to negotiate with, and acts like that. Serious.

But, it all hinges on my shoulders, and I am trying to realize a more stable basis of my own existence. I cannot work this way, as a helper and hold that responsibility. I need a sound basis to work from. I hope to realize this in a few months.

Until then, we still have this amazing opportunity to make peace. To evolve as humans.

There is a saying, that humanity is no more.

I object, it is truly alive.

G-d bless the will to peace.

The process of a new religion has begun. So far, I have not heard from his eminence archbishop Justin Welby, but it seems to me, that the Kabbalists are willing to help. That is good news, because they are the caretakers of the basic judaic principles of the religions that we all share.

It is good news indeed. It will be very taxing and difficult for the kabbalists to enter the world of the mundane, and actually realize their own prophesies. Being underground for five thousand years, gives you a bit of secluded worldview. But luckily the new generation is now both willing and open to the new trends.

Let us look at the first principle they have presented to us, as the basic principle behind religion. It is the principle, that you should not do something for yourself, but do what you wish to to do for the creator and your friends. In this view, self love or egoism is really the problem.

We all wish to look upon our own interest all the time, and not on the interest of our fellowman or the brotherhood of man. We wish to be fulfilled ourselves.

This is the basic idea behind people who are religious; to work for the common good not for ourselves.

Why? Because G-d is communion, not separation. We are all one, and only if we are able to release ourselves from the material world will we meet spirit. This is done, through the sacrifice of the individual.

Only when we are together with our fellowman in spiritual as well as social unity, will we serve G-d.

May he bless our path to him.

I know, that most of the world does not trust the Iranians. But, I do not understand, reading all the ancient hittitie things and ideas, knowing about Zoroastrianism, knowing about the world and the creed of the flame religion. Why can these people be less trusted than anybody else? Remember, we put them in a situation, where they did not feel we understood and respected them.

That was why Iran rebelled the first time, we now DO understand them, so there is hope and there is peace.

Often people see me as a warmonger, when I point to the fact, that caving in to IS, actually supporting them by giving them rehab is a very bad idea. But then when I do trust the Iranians, because of their history as one of the first civilizations of the world. Then that is wrong also.

Remember, I trusted Al-Sisi, he became an ally and a friend.

I know that Iran plays a double game in a sense. They have to, because there are forces, vile and destructive forces that wishes to destroy Israel. But there is also other forces, that wishes for peace and reconciliation. We have seen them in action for two years.

It is now up to us, to go on on this path, and create that peace.

Here we are all us kings, and we strive and we try, and perhaps, perhaps when we are not anymore, one of us is truly crowned as the true king. I say, that it is up to the Middle East itself to choose the one they want as king. Not the kings themselves.

Now there is peace, get used to it, because it will be a brief respite, before strive is there again. But in this small window, miracles can work and will appear, as the crown religion, that I want his eminence the Bishop of Cantebury, as the caretaker of Oxford to begin.

LET RELIGION LIVE AGAIN; LET G_D LIVE AGAIN. LET US ALL; WE WHO ARE THE HUMBLE SERVANTS OF HIS GRACE HAVE LIFE AGAIN. May people, and life, and all live again. Because, as people strive for this little rock, or that little place in the sun to survive, there is the bigger picture, there is Cyrus, and let us all give this victory to his glory. Let this victory of mankind be handled to him, so that, in his wisdom we may live and survive.

G-d bless you all, and may war end. G-d bless you.

Read more…

I have tried to find a way out of the problems I have with the current Danish PM. He simply refuses to accept the deal, and refuses to enter into dialogue.

There is only one way; we need to get rid of him, and, hopefully, get another PM who are able or willing to support me.

This I will work on for the next foreseeable future, and hope to accomplish.

I know this is a weak basis to build it upon, but, with all the risks it entails, I hereby give a green light for the procedure that should end up with an agreement on nuclear armament of Iran.

I will make sure, that I have the support, maybe not now, but in time.

I will rip the guts of the new PM, and install another one, who will support us.

G-d bless the will of the creator.

We are closing in in the Iran deal, and one thing is for sure; Danish politicians are enemies of the world. Whenever the international philosophical wing of Denmark tries their best to try and make peace, the politicians do whatever they can to ruin this work. By direct intervention as the last PM and now as a direct rejection as the current PM.

Is the fact that they do not understand, do not care or are just too incompetent?

No, they just have the normal arrogance of western leaders. They could not care less! They do not understand, and their horizon is as narrow as their understanding of their own culture. We all have to think and do as they do, or we are seen as “primitives”.

In that sense, I am a primitive, I admit it. Because I have several milleiums of knowledge, because I invented writing, agriculture, politics, the asylum, mathematics, psychology, the wheel.

What did this man do to give him status as number one evil of the world, one thing; as a cave man he is tumbling around in the world. It is called the evil of the narrow minded. We have a saying, that says, that against stupidity the G-ds themselves fight with no chance to win.

This is the worst, evil, wisdom bare, narrow-minded haughtiness.

I truly understand Iran, when they reject this manner. Because it is with no respect for the ancient culture Iran is. But I do also think, that there are people who do understand. As Obama and I, and then there are the Lars Løkke Rasmussen. The narrow-minded and uncompromising man of the West.

Choose Barack, fight Lars Løkke Rasmussen. Put him on sticks, burn him, despise him for his arrogance, and love the humanity we present.

G-d bless the will of spirit, as it will descend and lift our spirit to make peace.

The current conflict I have with the Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen, is a reflection of how a minister should NOT behave. I mean, to have power is an act of selfishness and humility. You serve, you do not command.

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. The levers of power may induce you with the feeling of invincibility and give you a puffed up ego.

Power is the test of your character the old greeks say. If you have a good character, you will be able to confront the sirene song of power, if you have a weak character, you will not be able to resist the corruption of power, and consequently try to steer competitors and power threats to your convenience.

This is the flaws of the weak character. You may also call it arrogance.

This is unfortunately the picture of how the new PM behaves. He is ready to sacrifice his friends, his international career, to hold on to power. He is, after a few days in the saddle, already corrupted.

This is why, he should be shunned by the international community. Corruption at the heart of a government rubs off on the connections he has. Do you want to be seen with a corrupted man? Do you want to be seen with a man defined by arrogance.

No, all wish to be seen with the good man, with nobility rather than debasement.

They say, that if a weak man is at the centre of power, all who are stronger than him, will be in trouble. That is why we need strong and unselfish leaders of our nations. Not weak and selfish leaders, this leads to disaster.

G-d bless the will to be simple and humble.

We are trying to found a new religion, as a kind of salvation as a consequence of the Middle East development. Whether we realize the Iranian deal or not, still the ambition of the Middle East; to realize its potential and win a place in the heart of humanity is still there.

But, we still need to put ourselves the question; if we truly reach this next level of enligthenment, what is then the basis of this? I have picked up a few books, olden, worn books on my bookshelf, ancient books some of them, lost and found by mankind. Some known, some unknown, and I, at least have some idea about the path we might ensue.

Look at it this way; we are sourrounded by sophists, or scientists, who wish to put all material things to scrutiny, and find all answers there. They do not repel moral order, but they will not believe unless they have a proof.

This materialism, is hard to fight, because, what do we have but ideas and beliefs? We have only truths from personal and spiritual experience.

This is why, I believe we have to respect the sophists, and talk their language, but on a higher level in all respects. We simply have to be better, much better. Our lore should be less fragmented, more beautiful, more true. Then we can compete with the sophists.

We have the possibility now, there is an open window, because science is falling. It is plagued by political correctness, political commisionaries, marxist thinkers who reduce rather than expand. All kind of nonsense. While we are still free to expand our knowledge without scrutiny. Because who will care if we search for G-d or find new ethical truths? Noone, because they do not take us serious anymore. This is truly our chance to forge new answers, with more quality less hearsay and more truth than the plagued sciences.

Let me give you an example. According to normal lore, there is no life after death. It is just a psychological journey, through pain and misery, and ends up as a material death, where our cells and atoms just dissapear. Who can live with this nonsense? Who will accept, in the long run, that there is no deeper meaning. Noone, all thirsten for a deeper meaning and sense. And if we give them that, in a row of ideas of quality, make it possible to truly believe again, we can compete, we can regain ground, matter again, be a part of normal life again.

It all comes down to answers of a high quality.

This ends and starts with one thing; cosmology. The sophists define our cosmos. They define life as a Darwinian/big bang theory that we have to make a better answer to. This is where Oxford comes into play. Because I truly believe, that the cosmology that I present, as a true Anaxagorean system, will compete and even better the ideas of Hawkins.

It will then be a competition between Oxford and Cambridge, on who has the better answer. The only thing is; my answer, anwers the question of who G-d is, and what he is. In this way, G-d willing, and with the help of his eminence archbishop Welby. We can turn the tide. It is radical, and only through the influence of Welby and perhaps mr. Cameron through Brasenose, are we able to compete. This is the life and death question of both Anglican Christianity, but also religion in general. Through the crisis of Anglicanism, and the desperate measures we have to take, we can turn the tide, all of us.

It does not end there, there are more layers than Anaxagoras, there is Heraclitus and Demokrit to add to the theory. If only Oxford is willing to talk true metaphysics again. Is able and daring enough.

G-d willing, and Welby willing, we will, all of us, prevail.

G-d bless the will of his eminence and force of our holy and blessed father.

The Iran deal is nearing its final moments. I have been an adamant supporter of this deal. It all started after I, with mr. Barack Obama pulled the teeth of mr. Ahmadinejad. I suppose the single greatest victory of the first tenure of Obama.

Now we are here, it is all set and done. Mr. Netanyahu has been against the deal from the very outset, because he believes that the Persians will remodify the deal after the deal has been done, and the pressure is lifted.

Well, the original pressure, is still here, Barack and I are here, we can push, and we do push.

But what after Obama is not president anymore? Things change, and can we still believe in the deal.

Well, if I get the necessary support from my own government, it is viable.

This has been a proposal I have put to the new government, and the PM mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen. But, until now, he has not been open for negation. Heaven know it is a small and minimal proposal. I have demanded around one million dollars to make a film and support some bloggers.

I cannot sustain a deal of this magnitude by working as a helper as I do now. I have no problems working as a helper, but it is simply too irresponsible, especially towards Israel to support a deal, if it only is founded by my own self. I need the Danish government to chip.

So far, without result. Løkke Rasmussen is very new to the game, and I seriously hope, that it is all about trying to find his way, and wrangling with his new role. But I also suspect an element of arrogance and defiance. It is all about power. He wants to be the one in control, and in this I am a problem.

I still support the deal, but I need Danish official recognition of my role in it, to maintain it after Obama is gone.

I am sorry, but this is the it has to be.

You could perhaps all help by ignoring Løkke Rasmussen until he has entered the negotiations himself, or by one of his ministers. It would be a great help. Apart from that, I will put internal pressure on his government, to make him change his mind.

G-d bless you all, and think about the fact, that this is not a deal made on earth, but belongs to the realm of heavens, as it is both good and beautiful.

We are nearing a conclusion in the ongoing negotiations between Russia, the US, Iran and, in the periphery Israel.

People say, that Obama was not strong in foreign policy, but if this deal is landed, he will, or rather there is a very good chance, he will be lauded as the most succesful American president in foreign matters.

I have a good American friend, in fact a very wise american friend, who shares my love for Søren Kierkegaard. He tries to find that middle road between Islamic extremism at one hand, and racism at the other hand. Not to fight IS because you are a racist, makes no sense, not to fight the torching of black churches makes no sense either. I believe he is right, you have to find that middle ground. Kierkegaard believes that you come from seduction, that is your immoral and often unrealized needs, to ethics, but can reach spirit by forgiving.

I believe when it comes to the conflicts we are trying to solve in the world today, that we need to reach that middle point; and that is ethics. We need to be ethical and sharp on our own values and ideas to navigate in the world.

Everybody agrees, that mr. Barack Obama tries his best to be a good man, and in this lies the salvation and the moral compass of international politics. Its is very difficult, but met by a moral order, it seems to me, that the Middle East finally will find some kind of peace. Hopefully.

It is quite obvious, that the sunni muslim fighters of IS are immoral. Killing civilians on a beach? Come on, and then quoting G-d for this inhuman act.

Finding the moral high ground in this conflict is not difficult.

We are now nearing the end of the negotiations of the hittitie empire. Once there were asylums, remember Persia? When you developed some of the very basis of mankinds lore. As hittitie cities were asylum for those who were in need.

This is a good deed, and as a consequence, more good deeds will come of that fertile ground that is Persia. Not to mention Assad, who are trying to protect all creeds in his country.

I reach out for peace, and may we, by the will of the supreme being, reach that state of equilibrium, just for a day or two. But we will be able to say; we were there, we were the men behind that little window of peace. War will come again, but we will have peace as long as I am here, and Barack is there.

G-d bless the peace we may find.

It is said, that in the olden times, our forefathers migrated from Denmark or somewhere around, and came to Greece. According to the great Danish historian Wilhelm Grønbech, they put up shop on a rock on the Peloponnes.

After some time, through the time of Homer, the Myceneans became Athenians, and great visionaries as Socrates and Plato were sparks that flew out of that fertile mould.

Up here in the North, we can still see the resemblances with us and the Greek.

Time has come, it has softened some edges, but that vicious spark of freedom is still there in the soul of the Greek. It is still there thousands and thousands years after Homer. They call it Sparta, but the truth is, that the Dorians (Danes) were fighters of G-d. Heed to that creed, to that spirit, and you may free yourselves.

All this banking thing, forget about it, it is about slavery from the European Union, they are trying to enslave you in the name of Mammon.

Free yourselves, as your ancestors did. Free yourselves from that slavery siphoned from invisible chains. Vote NO!

As you are the heirs to one of the greatest civilizations on earth, and you are right to insist on doing things your own way, in your own country. The Germans do not understand, that they are of the same blood as you. But they will understand, after you have gained your freedom from the yoke of banking tyranny.

It is not about the debt, it is about creating a superstate of hitherto unknown proportion. Banking is just a tool to make that Union. They will stop at nothing, and you should remember who you are, as descendants of those great viking warriors that first inhabited that barren rock, that is now known as Akropolis.

It is a symbol, deep down, on the first virtue of our forefathers; freedom.

G-d bless the freedom Greece may have as a descendant and fighter for the value of the vikings; a free man in his own right.

After the horrendous attack, or rather strings of attacks against western and pro democratic targets in the Middle East, we are at the discussion; who were the attackers?

Well, you should ask themselves, and you will find the answer; they are sunni muslims who are fighting for an old school islamic state. That is a kingdom based on the writings and doings of the prophet Muhammad.

This is a state system in direct opposition to democracy. As in the fight between Communism and Democracy, we now have another political fight between Islamism (political Islam) and Democracy.

In more detail. The islamic state is based on sharia, that is holy law deduced from the Koran and the Hadiths. In opposition to this democracy is, ideally, based on the will of the people. This is the base of the American Constitution and the Magna Carta.

Now, it is a bit of an artificial division. There are greyzones, where some muslims believe in part of the political part of Islam and not all. But there are states that are democratic and Muslim, like Egypt and Tunisia. In Libya, we fought for democracy, but remember, this is also a Muslim country.

So, that is how it is, ask an honest Muslim, and he will agree.

We need to stick to that, for several reasons. First of all, because this is how it is. Secondly, by showing the Muslim world, that we actually do understand the ins and outs of Islam, we present ourselves as a serious player in the international game. This was one of the reasons, that it was, and is a mistake to support the Muslim Brotherhood. When and if we do this, they will see us as unknowing and manipulative in the game of the Middle East.

Thirdly, it gives the part of the Muslim world, that are willing to make alliances and support us, a way. Like in Egypt, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia but also Syria and Iran.

Fourthly; religious wars are the worst. When we fight for our freedom, we fight for something positive and emancipating. Fighting for G-d, or as we believe G-d tells us often lead to fanaticism and fascism. Remember facism is not just a rule of Italy under Moussolini, it is the idea that you are absolutely right.

When we fight for our freedom, we know that we are not always right, and consequently have the humility to allow other creeds and political understanding a place in our society. As Jews, as gays, as other minorities. It creates freedom, tolerance and peace.

So, no I do not believe all Muslims are evil, I believe we fight a political strand of Sunni Islam, that has the arrogance to believe that they know what G-d wants us to do. They do not, because G-d always changes his mind. He is for love and solidarity, not for murder and rape. This is not G-d, this is man.

G-d bless all who believe in peace and freedom.