The problems in the current construct of the European Union is simple; the politicians do not listen to the needs of the people. When the politicians fight to keep the system working and grasp for even more power, they forget who they are working for; the people.

It seems to me, that the politicians have created their own world very far from the street. A world where no real needs are met. Only the needs of the lobbyist seem to have any consequence in the halls in Brussels.

This do not work. A government have only one purpose; to serve the needs of the population. The people is not there for the politicians, the politicians are there for the people.

Now, the feedback systems from the peoples of Europa and back to the government are not working. The centralized government do not understand how it is to be a common citizen in Sweden or Ireland. They can see as far as the cafe in front of the parliament.

Now, there is a solution to the problems that the European Union is in the midst of. It is a very painful but healthy solution. The solution is for the politicians to get out of their ivory tower and meet the normal citizens. Listen to what they really need, try to meet their needs, go on leave for half a year to work in a run down community.

This will teach the ministers, the highofficials, the imposant empire builders their real task; to serve the people.

To find a solution to problem of the modern world, one can search in history for inspiration. The system we have today, what we call democracy is a system with deep roots. It goes all the way back to Mesopotamia and famed cities as Eden (Eridu) and Babylon. The theory behind the triangulation of power between a king (the president) aristocracy (the upper house) and the people (the lower house) is developed in the time of the semitic kingdoms we still preserve as a memory in the bible.

Most of the problems we have now is a direct consequence of the system we have. So the solutions people found to the same problems they had, when they invented the system, might still be valid.

Let us have a look at the system and the faults. The faults are simple; corruption, lack of loyality, lack of tradition, no respect for law, no respect for freedom of speech. This creates chaos, and a chaos where you cannot understand your neighbour, do not wish to work with him, and often live an isolated life.

This is painful for the individual, the lonelyness of the single career person in the megacities of modern times, is heartbreaking.

In the ancient times, when democracy was invented, they had the same problems in a city called Babylon. Babylon was a modern city, a gigantic city, famed for its massiv size, and its advanced system of government. They invented democracy.

Now, judaism, and subsequently christianity and islam is founded in Babylon by a man called Abraham. Abraham lived in the megacity of the ancient Mesapotamia, and just as we have today, Babylon was plunged into individualism and corruption. Its symbol is the tower of Babylon. A tower where nobody understands anybody. The Babylonians just kept building on that tower until it reached the sky, and plunged into the abyss.

As we are now.

Read more…

When Karl Marx initaited his amazing but frayed attempt to reconcile the different classes of the world into one, he forgot about a single, very important factor of human life; greed. Or, rather, he knew that greed is a motivator of people, so he thought that the abolishment of the right to own anything would stop the greed of the world. He was mistaken, the greed is still here, and it has morphed into a war of classes so devasting it is ripping the western world apart.

The netto result of the socialist experiment, today called socialdemocratic ideology, has not been a classless society as Marx dreamed about, it has been a society where the middle class tyrannizes the other two classes; the lower class and the upper class. The middle class is so strong that it has won all the central positions within media, bureaucracy and most of politics. The war is conducted through economical means and censureship.

The middle class tries to extract the highest amount of money to distribute, not to the poor people, but to themselves, thereby creating a corrupt “upperclass”, preying on the traditional upperclass. If the middle class had shown respect and veneration for the needs of the upperclass, we could have had equality, but propelled by greed, the middle class has sought to extract as much money from the rich as possible. The hippocracy is here the obvious discrepansy between argument and action. The argument for the middle class to take the money and the honour from the upperclass, has been the argument of equality, obviously the direct opposite has been the result. The middle class tyrannizes the upperclass with all the greed Marx tried to work out of mankind.

Read more…

The day has come where the Libyan people have to choose a new future. So many years have passed in the evil clutches of Gadhaffi, in tyranny, in oppression, in chains. These chains will very soon be broken and a new dawn will emerge in the near east, ready to sweep away all the conflicts, all the trouble, all the inertia of having a society bereft with corruption. We from West, the democratic league, applaud this development, and we congratulate you with all our hearts. We have watched you strive to win your own freedom, and we have respected the fight you had on you own, in order to win your own country. You did that and we are so immensly happy, that words cannot describe our feeling. We cry with you, we dance with you, we salute your new won freedom.

But after the freedom has been won, you will have very little time to confirm and establish your democracy. Napoleon had only hundred days at his disposal, you may have even less. Count fifty days from the day Gadhaffi falls.

Anyway, there are two basic principles and a triade of organisation you have to consider. First the principles of a democratic state; justice and freedom. Justice lies in the institution of law, freedom lies in the institution of the popular assembly.

What are these two principles?

Read more…

Today Ghadaffi blasted Denmark. Ghadaffi scorned Denmark for the critical stance towards Islam, and islamism. Let it be heard, without any doubt, with no regret, with the full heart of a noble nation; we stand by our critisism. Yes, the foul deeds done in the islamic world, the torture, the tyranny, the corruption, the rape of citizens, the evil that overflows the banks of these systems, are of no real humanistic value, we despise them, we do not like them, we fight them with all our heart, with all of our dwindling might, with all our soul, because it is a system unfit for the common man, it is a system of fascism.

Now what do we have to offer instead? We have the system of democracy, this beautiful, advanced, just and social system. Yes there is of lot of corruption in it today, yes we did foul things in the past, in the torture of Latin America, in the evil ways in China, Africa and India. We did wrong, we have admitted it, and we have payed our debts in the honour of our women, in the tears of our children, as they were raped by the criminal immigrants. We have payed our debts, and it is time for us to realize the inherent beauty of our system. Because the problem with our ways have not been the system itself, but the betrayal of the principles that lie at basis of our valuable and fine system called democracy.

What we have to offer is the freedom of that system, the freedom that lies at the basis of the principles. We are offering this freedom to the people of the Middle East. We have thrived with this system for many hundred years, not until recently did we part from the principles of democracy; freedom of speech, the rule by law, transperency, solidarity. And the fight we are figthing in Libya is not only a fight to free the people of Libya, but also a fight to cleanse ourselves from the corruption that is within our own systems of belief. It is both an inner and an outer fight.

This is what we have to offer, this is the terms we are trying to meet ourselves; the freedom of the peoples. Not only the american people or the danish people, but all the peoples of the world. The little man, the mighty queen, the beautiful baby, are all members of a nation grounded in the will of the people. We are all equal in the eyes of the state, and we can all seek justice within that system of belief.

Will the libyans choose the danish system, or will they choose Ghadaffi? I stand with Denmark. I am the only fighter left in fray here in Denmark, but yet still standing. I stand tall, and I support the libyans, the iranians, the bahranians, the syrians, the saudis, the egytians, the morrocans, the yemenite, the jordanian, the palestinian, all people who want simply to be free.

The world turns at its hinges once again, old allies are deftly reverting from friend to foe. We see the final chapter of European colonialism unfolding in front of our very eyes. European civilization, once the leader of the world, projected and unfurled from the blasting ovens of England, from the chambers of royal Spain, from the inner core of the French republic. Is now falling, falling apart in neglect, in lack of faith, in corruption by the leaders of our realms. The effect is a vast changing of the political structure of the world. The muslims are trying to regenerate as they put most of their hopes into a political version of their faith, emblazoned and put forth by that juggler of fortunes called Ahmadinejad. The Chinese are competing with unsound methods, by stealing technology and reproducing the ideas of the west in  an unrespecting manner.

The Europeans are bound on hand and feet by a corrupt and elusive elite, trying to control the masses by illegal means.

Read more…

The coming conflict between life and death, creativity and stillness is approaching with immense steps, unrecognized by the citizen of normal nation, but recognized by the elite of intellectuals leading the fight here and there around the globe.

Let me be clear about my basic view of things. My entire work, focus and drive has, from the beginning been to prove the existence of G-d. This may sound prepostorous, and let me be honest, I do not know whether this project will be fulfilled or not, but I know that I have come some way down the lane.

In this fight I have detoured many ways, and have been a very active player in the way of things. Among other things I have defined is the fight between democracy and Islam. But this is just, I am sorry to say, minor intellectual feats. It is pretty obvious if you read about Islam and know your Plato, Aristotle, and history in general. The true test, however, lies in the ability to turn the western world away from its selfdestruction. This selfdestruction is mainly caused by a superficiality in faith. The lack of faith in spirituality drives us into the arms of materialism. It is all sex, drugs and rock’n roll.

Now, there is nothing wrong with our nature, if we understand the shadow. The cruelty of nature. The cruelty of nature is just there, and it is an unwise, greedy child that has to be understood and cared for within limits. If we scorn our nature, we will loose the connection to the very basis of our existence.

Read more…

To be able to define G-d is a matter og faith, some say, I say not. To define G-d is a theoretical nigthmare and an intellectual Marathon that only the most devout disciple of the temples of Heliopolis are able to fulfill. I think I have come to a crossroads, this flight is heaped with transgressions, misleadings, a fight against the curtain that is put between us and the roots of our civilisation.

The formula is simple. We know of two basic ideas that make up the theory of G-d; intelligence and creation. We believe that G-d is all intelligence in the cosmos, and we believe that this intelligence is the prerequisite of creation. Creation is done by using intelligence. Now how can we prove this point. Well, as C.G. Jung explains, based on a thorough study of hermetism and alchemy, we have to disperce of the idea, that the brain is the container of intelligence, because there are many animals who have intelligence but no brain. Where does the intelligence come from; simple, it is G-d. Where else could anything as immaterial come from. Or you could say, that the intelligence is what we call G-d.

Read more…

I believe that the future is pregnant with alterations of immense proportion. We will change the face of the earth, for better or worse. The sprout of redemption is planted in the fertile soil of the current world events. The decks are prepared, the bets are placed, and the winner will be the ruler of mankind.

In this game of immense powermongering titans, the life of a normal citizens of faraway countries is blown out in a blink of eye, not herded but forgotten as of now.

This Armageddon, this ragnararok that has been prophesized so many years ago, is about to start.

All the premises of war are there. The generals are sitting in a powderkeg smoking cigars, and the world will soon erupt in an all engaging war with the Russians and the Iranians on one side, the Anglo-saxons, hopefully the Danes, and the Jews on the other side. This will be concluded in the swampy powder-constructs called atomic bombs. The bombs are all there, the Iranians have them almost, so do the Jews, the Anglo-Saxon and the Russians.

Read more…

We slowly descend into an abyss of hatred, corruption and despair. Our ancient institutions of civilization are dismantled in front of our very eyes. Dismantled by an elite of evil and idiocracy.

We live on the brink of chaos, and we are the willing cattle herded to the slaughter. Yet, there are small glimpses of hope, tiny, flickering lights of illumination. These lights are haunted by the corrupt, and are, as of now so weak, that a gust of wind can blow them out. Yet they continue their beautiful course, undisturbed by the neglect and the evil of the chosen few, on that awfull construct, called our current legislation and rule.

Lets put a few of those principles that has lead to chaos, under the scrutiny of light. First of all, the basic problem of our western world is the detoriation of our institutions. Untill now, the institutions of the west have primarialy been upheld by the nationstate. This is a tradition that is founded in Mesopotamia around seven thousand years ago, and have primarialy been conveyed to the west through Hellas and Rome.

Read more…

Some reflections made by Polybius on Treason

Hence it is difficult to define those upon whom we can properly lay the name of traitor. Perhaps the situation which comes nearest to it is one in which men at a time of public danger, for reasons either of personal safety or profit, or because of differences with the opposing party put their city into the hands of the enemy, or who by admitting a garrison or calling in foreign assistance to further their personal aims and bring their countries under foreign power. All who commit actions of this kind may fairly be regarded as traitors. And yet, as everybody agrees, the treachery practised by such men has never brought them any real profit or advantage – in fact precisely the opposite – so much that we ask with amazement what their original motives can have been, or what calculations can have possibly have impelled them to rush into such a fatal situation.

Read more…

The Egyptians had a very funny way of seeing spirit as something present but yet impossible to see. The explanation is natural, physical and yet spiritual. They held in their ideology that everything is made of energy. Some energy vibrates at a very slow rythm, other energy vibrates at a very fast rythm. Some energy vibrates so fast that human beings cannot see it.

This is more or less a description of how it is to be a philosopher i Denmark. Kierkegaard was very tired of it, Grundtvig really had problems with censorship. Grønbech just gave up.

This is how it is for me as well. Let me give you an example. These days an iranian philosopher Mr. Darius Shayegan is the guest of a university in Århus. We are advesaries, he has supported the Iranian Islamic republic, i support the danish democracy. As we both should. He bases his ideas on the spiritual ideas of the islamic tradition, namely the tradition of sufism. I respect that, sufism is parrallel to gnosticism in the christian areas and kabbalism in the jewish faith. It is platonic in the sense that Plato represents the tradition that were in Hellas in his time. Traditions based on mesopotamic and egyptian theory.

Now the so called “philosopher” Stjernfelt, who is really just a theoretician in language, with no interest in metaphysics, natural science, politics or cosmology, critizise the iranian philosopher because he is a sufi. This angle is a disgrace to danish academia, it shows us off as ignorants. There is nothing wrong with sufism, as long as it respects the boundaries of the secular state. What is wrong is the elements of sharia and chaliphate (sunni-Saud’i arabia). And on the iranian side the combination of islamic priesthood and democracy (shia-Iran). Because these systems are competitors to the danish model of a secular state with no religion as a base of the law and the democratic process.

And the list goes on. The socalled “chief advocate” Machanga does not know anyhing about the basis of law, namely justice. The christian debater Lilleør does not know anything about christianity, when the discussion about the poor girls who are mutilated by primitive muslim parents and uncles started, she defended the uncles!. The editor of the liberal online newspaper 180 grader Ole Birk Olesen, thinks that I am crazy. Meanwhile Birk Olesen argues for the absurd idea that only uncivilized persons critisize Islam. He is one of the most uncivilized editors in the history of danish media!

My conclusion can be only one. It is the stupidity, the ignorance of the socalled danish intellectuals that is the problem. They do not know anything, they have no moral integrity, they are uncivilized. Because of this the democratic debate is hindered.

Some say that ignorance is bliss. Well it might be so for the ignorant, but for the ones who actually have knowledge, it is a horror.

The corruption of society takes enoumous leaps, so fast now, it is hard to follow these leaps into destruction. Yesterday I looked at some of the pictures taken from Haiti. The pictures somehow burned themselves on my retinas, and in the night i woke up in alarm. The pictures of Haiti are pictures of a state in total disarray, a state in the clutches of the junglelaw.

It has been cooking for a long time. The tragedy of the poor haitians is not a tragedy that has only come with the earthquake, but a tragedy that has been piled up for so long. In Africa, before the colonization, beautiful civilisations where present. They had it all figured concerning gender. It was a beautiful place with ethics and virtues to strife for. The legacy of this world before colonialization is still there to grasp the mind of the africans. But in Haiti, where most of the inhabitants are from Africa none of this ancient legacy is kept in memory. No ideals are there, and everything just becomes what the animal in man dictates; the rule of the strong. Mobrule.

The pictures are horrific; murder, plundering, and all the worst in mankinds repetoire of evil is present. The law is abolished, and the rule of the strong is reimplemented. We feel safe behind our computerscreens. Somehow the suffering of a far away people takes a little of the pressure off our shoulders. Someone are worse off than we, we think.

Well, perhaps the abyss that the haitians are falling into is a prelude to what we will encounter if we are not sharp on the challenges that we are confronted with.

What we see in Haiti is chaos. The end cycle of democracy is also chaos. Exactly the same menagerie could be ours in Denmark if we are not very careful. Because chaos is what we will taste if law breaks down in our lands as well. It is not because we have not ohad warnings; shootings, rapings, theft, hedonism. All signs of corruption in society.

Read more…

According to Plato and the hellenic historian Thycudides, the backside of that beautiful coin called democracy is corruption. This weakness of democracy was well known in the ancient Hellas. Democracy was the main organizational method of most of the hellenic city states. There was off cause Sparta that had a more aristocratic way of doing things. But even Sparta had a council and the citizens used to vote on things as well, in the mass, the central, communal gathering they made every day.

Because this recognition of democracy having a weak side, most democracies and their inhabitants were very observant about the problem, and their intellectuals tried to find ways of controlling the situation. Platos political ideas were made in a time where democracy fell to corruption. And much of his political work could be seen as a experimenting and search for the perfect society in absolute balance between freedom and moral.

His point was  that the quality of democracy is freedom and the quality of aristocracy is ethics or moral. Therefor one has to combine these two organizational methods into one unit. Sparta was, in a way, such an ideal society. They had kings, and they a form of democracy.

Today we encounter the weak side of democracy on an international level. The systems we installed after the french revolution democracy + the rule of law, has reached its final developmental cycle; chaos. This is obvious in The US, Great Britain, France, Denmark, and to some extent in Germany. The corruption of democracy has been formalized on an federal level, so that it somehow merges into a enormous juggernaut of destruction. The European Union is such a condensation of corruption. Most of the decitions made by the EU is against the will of the people, and it bears all the stigmatas of a democracy in a violent, spinning decay. One of the main parameters of a failing democracy is the lack seriousness attached to the citizenship. The citizenship is the very core of the state. Each citizen abides to the laws and the decitions of the rulers of democray. This gives a certain cohesion and a mutual playing ground. If this core institution is weakened the law is weakened as a result. This is quite obvious in all of the west. The citizenship is weakened to an extreme. In Denmark the state protects foreign citizens much more than citizens of the state. In the example of the attack on the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, the state cannot send the foreigner home to his original state. Why? Because he has international rights. And the state is not aware of the extreme importance connected to the citizenship and the function of it. To be a citizen is an honour, and the state should protect its citizens.

Read more…

To be healthy both body and soul should be in prime condition. The body is kept healthy through exercise good eating habits and dance. The soul is kept healthy through interaction with other healthy souls, and through a connection to the inner part of God or Osiris that is part of man. In hermetic and gnostic litterature one defines three stages of personality. The material (the body) the soul and the spirit.

These ideas are very old, and has its echo in intellectuals as Jung, Herder, Grundtvig, Plato and many other thinkers.

In relation to the rape of the poor young girls, how do the person react to that? Well young girls are fragile beings, like flowers on the very first stage of blossoming. In a way the beauty of such a young person is in its virginity something of a miracle. Evil men are attracted to the beauty of these young girls, and instead of praising and helping the girls finding their way in life. They hurt them, abuse, kill their connection to all that is beauty. Leaving them as crushed flowers in the site of the road. Run over by meaness and babarity.

They are like brutes in the garden of Eden.

One of my friends is a girl that was abused. Her story is heartbreakening. She is now mature, but her innercore is broken by the barbarians. She almost married, found a nice danish boyfriend, but when he heard about the former life of the girl, he split. She is transformed from a nice danish girl to something unclean. In this way, she carries a burden of guilt and brokenness she cannot tell her husband. Because it would ruin their relationsship.

Read more…

Making an interview on a blog poses some advantages and some disadvantages. The technical quality of the interveiw is often much worse than what you normally see in interviews in the television. That is the drawback, the good thing is however a much wider timeframe. In television you are very limited in your timeframe, you are only allowed specific amounts of minutes and seconds. Somehow modern tv has decided that time has to be speeded up, as though running faster will keep the audience.

Wrong, what keeps the attention of people is quality, and their interests.

But, these considerations however lead to a new way of looking at the interview in connection with the blogs. Time is unlimited, and people who read the blogs are mostly people who like to discuss, are interested in knowledge, and the competetition in this specific genre is almost nonexistent. Very few people make interviews on the internet.

All in all a dreamscenario for an interviewer.

The result is a much longer and deeper discussion, compared to interviews in television. The technical quality is worse, but the intellectual discussion is much better.

This combined with my Soctratic attitude to interviews, that truth is to be found in dialogue, creates somehow a new genre of interviews. The first interview with Mr. Lars Hedegaard created a lot of commotion, perhaps because the form in itself was so strange to the audience, that they simply underestimated the quality of the work, and thought it was the work of low quality.

It is up to you to decide, because the idea of quality is, to a large extent, a subjective feeling. There are off cause an extensive estetichal discussion that might follow the discussion of the form, but let it be. It is just interviews.

The wind blows, some trees fall, some remain erect in the storm, winding it off, clutching the earth with their roots, standing straight in the evil flow of darkness. The storm is over, and the tall trees of the forest are still standing, as they have remained erect, in all these years, blown by the foul breath of the left. These trees have deep roots, roots that goes all down to the very core of humanity; brazen they stand defending truth and ethics. The vile imposers to the throne, emerged in black garment of filth, bowing to the darkest strains in humanity, screaming foul words of insolence at the defenders of light and truth. They have no boundaries, love is not in their sight, only hate and murder do they thrive upon. Long hurls of demolition, burning things, defiling the name justice, this is the methods of the foul offspring of darkness.

Now the nights of light, so few, has gathered from all corners of politics, left right, the middle to combine in a small band of lightbringers. It is the elite, the most hardened and true. They are marxists, they are christians, they are jew, they are even muslims – and they still stand tall in the face of corruption so evenly spread out by the massedia. The midgets of injustice, screeching their foul words into cosmos.

It is a fight between light and darkness, between corruption and truth, between good and evil, between knowledge and impure faith. It is a fight between the stupidity of the international masses against the princes of light. Somehow the stupidity of the masses have conquered important strongholds of light. Or rather, together with the danish people the nights of light, are fighting the dark trends of multiculture within politics and media.

A new year is coming, perhaps a change will occur. Perphaps the dark clouds sorrounding the the sun will be forced a little back. We succeed in penetrating the clouds once in a while, this work might continue and eventually succeed.

In the lower recess of the mediteranean civilisation, behind layers of metaphysics and theory, the beautiful allegory of the Egyptian godess of Isis is at work. According to legend, Isis is the moon godess. She is the one that will guide the soul when it is trapped in the cloth of nature on earth. As Plato describes in the cave allegory, mankind is bound to the end of the wall of a cave, light cannot reach down there, because nature is a prison to the soul. And the sun is too strong a source of truth to mankind to stare into, therefor we look at the moon. It is light, but it is a light we can cope with. Isis; the queen of light. And Isis has a spouse or a son called Osiris. As God is too vibrant for us too see, as the sun, Osiris is the part of us that is God, in our souls that we can see. Osiris is the redeemer, the regenerator. Because only through truth can we truly cut the bands of darkness that surrounds us these days.

One mighty victory was won for the light, more is to come. And in the end, we might win the war against the deep insulary nature of man. The corruption that is strangeling us, brought to us by the harbingers of stupidity. The persons caught in nature without any spirit to help them.

They call Isis the virgin of cosmos. And it is said that she will always remain a virgin, because like the sea, the sea might be darkened by the filth of stupidity and ignorance, but the water remains pure. And it is through the cleansening of the water that we remain human, and drag ourselves away from the nature itself. Nature is beautiful. But if you as a human being are only in nature, and have no spiritual search and faithfulness to truth, you become nothing but an animal.

And that is what the knights of the light are fighting against; the animal, savage natural incarnation of man, brought to us by media and the very darkest sides of Islam in conjunction.

Let the nights of life and beauty be strengthened next year. Let the princes of light emerge as strong allies of truth, and let them save the world.

I think we are approaching either the demise of mankind, or a new spiritual awakening. It is quite simple; the ability to destroy ourselves has never been greater in the history of mankind. We are able to destroy ourselves numorous times with the weapons we have got. The naivety of the west has put the world in an extremely dangerous situation. Atomic weaponry should never have been allowed to states that are very willing to use them. But yet they are, and this puts the world on path to destruction. The west created the weapons of mass destruction, but someone else might use them for real.

We cannot continue finding the destroyers, there will be a time where a roguestate will fire off an atomic bomb. It could very well happen here in Copenhagen with all the fuss an all the conflicts between the east and the west centered in Denmark.

Man was given a responsability to nature. We say that man was made in the image of God. Why? Because man is the only living entity on earth who is given the gift and the curse of intelligence. With intelligence man can rise above nature, and carry out decisions based on thought. Since, according to the classical egyptians, God is nothing but thought, man is an intermediary between God and nature. We are the daimons, the mix of God and nature. We are the guardians of nature. The sheperds of the flowers and the forest, the dolphins and the ants. Because if we do not take the responsability of the intelligence we are given, we will destroy nature, and ourselves. This was the core of the climate meeting, we have to embrace the responsibilty we carry as daimons. But it is not about the Co2 really, it is about not killing each other.

We have, potentially, the gift of God. The gift that could make a universal society based on truth and responsability to things around us. If we abstain from killing and raping each other, we could, with the development within the realms of natural science create a world of abundance and joy. Nature could serve us, in a good way, but on its own conditions. We should carry the task of natural preservation and care, with all the burden of the will of the intelligence of God.

Now how do we reach this target? First of all, someone has to do something about the danish media. Denmark is the hub of the new spiritual enlightentment of the world. But the danish media is doing all it can to stop it. It even goes to the extent as to try to kill whoever opposes its hegemony, as it has tried with me twice. It is really the greatest problem of the world right now, and anyone who have the slightest responsability to the future of mankind should work out a solution to this problem. The whole world should really focus on the wrath of the danish media, fight it, enlighten it, whenever it tries to kill someone, blow the act out into all corners off the world media. Everbody should know about the hatred and the evil materialistic spirit of the danish media. It was shown amply in the last conflict I and Lars Hedegaard just had with the danish media, most of it tried to kill our message. This will not do if we are to reach a solution to the threat of mankind. Forget about Afghanistan, forget about climate change, forget about the conflict between Iran and Israel. The problem is here in Denmark, the danish media is trying to kill the solution to the problem of mankind, with all its might. Christians, muslims, jews, buddhist, agnostics, communists, anarchists, hindus, zoroastrians, bahai, all that cares for the world and the future of mankind, focus on the danish media, put pressure on it, buy it up, force it to stop trying to kill the philosophers of Denmark. It is a system of extreme corruption, of idiocy and no knowledge. It will do almost anything to try to stop any spiritual awakening, any attempt to stop mankind on its path to destruction.  It is the future of all living things that is at stake, and the first barricade to scale is the danish media.

And remember, we do this to carry the torch of light and truth, that torch that is corrupted and put out by the evil materialistic nature of the danish media.

I am very happy to have caused all the commotion in connection to the interview I did with Mr. Lars Hedegaard, the chairman of The Free Speech Society. Once again the media have underestimated me. Perhaps there will be a time when they show a little more intelligence in the fight with me. So far the strategy has been to try to kill me, and then ignore me. But they will have to kill me for real if they are to get rid of me. Otherwise they just have to do what I say. And that is to respect their basic obligation; to search for the light and the truth. In fact be themselves, do what they are supposed to do, follow the example of Voltaire, Socrates, Kirkegaard. Or be the slaves of stupidity.

Well let me explain why I did the interview. First of all it was to shed some light on the dark sides of Islam. We all have faults, and Islam has a lot. The fault of the west is too much liberty, and the fault of the east is too much restrain. Liberty from oppression is something we are encountering in the west because the east has all its rules. This is off cause not tolerable, freedom of expression, freedom of will we should not loose. But when it comes to personal ethics, being a true person with respect for the persons around us, we have a problem in the west. The loyalty to the states are falling apart, the time when a word of man was unbreakable, is long gone. The corruption of the state is picking up its pace. This is the fault of the west. On the other hand, the fault of the east is the conservative strings attached to everything of real importance, and especially  the strings attached to knowledge. Knowledge should not be a item of the state, God or the local priesthood. Knowledge is for everyone, and should be free to attain. Then there is the issue with the girls. Girls are not allowed much in the east, this should stop. Let the girls free, they are beautiful amazing creatures with their faults, but you cannot love a slave. You can only love a free person. If you keep girls as slaves you will not experience the truth of God, because God is not something you can meet in meditation, God you meet with other persons, in love.

Luckily the ignorance of the media is flaunted into the open. It is a bit funny to see all the selfrighteous mediapersons bask around in the limelight, with absolutely no clue about what they are talking about. It is ridicolous. But they should have listened to what I said; you are the guys saying that the emperor has clothes on, and I was right.

Anyway, before we start throwing stones and mud on each other, please everybody, focus on the issue instead of the messenger. It is about the girls, they are raped by evil men. If there is any justice in Islam, it would obviously recognise that rape within families are unjust. And the muslims in the world should be aware of the atrocities done to the danish girls by muslim men. There was a poor girl who were held in shed for a year, beaten, tortured by her muslim boyfriend. How can this but bring a bad name to Islam? Is this the way Islam wants to be represented in the West? If not, it should stop. It is a disgrace to Islam what is happening here in Denmark, and even worse in Sweden.

My father was a muslim from Bangladesh actually. The spirituality I witnessed there was beautiful, but I cannot recognice this beauty in the rape of my friends.

It is an ethical discussion, and right now Islam is low on points here in Denmark.

I will repeat my endeavours, I will fight this fight until I am no more. Because justice and light is not to be abandoned in the cowardice of the western media, and the evil of the western Islam. There will be light as long as I am here, with my companions to serve the truth.

It is not a blame game, it is at quest for beauty and truth. Because only through these principles can we really reach love.

One of the beauties of the internet is the fact, that it gives the philosopher an easy and almost free way to distribute his ideas. Under the french revolution the philosophers had to rely on books and newspapers, much more cumbersome and difficult than the internet.

In the current phase of state-corruption, the philosopher is supposed to be the guardian of society. By giving an understanding of the situation, and provide simple remedies, he or she should try to guide democracy away from the collapse and the subsequent chaos.

The information is there, all you have to do, as a philosopher, is to read “The State” by Plato and “Politics” by Aristotle.

It is actually, seen from an academic point of view, quite easy. The hard task is to distribute the ideas and inspire the politicians to change course from corruption to ethics.

The problem, in its first phase, is therefor solved, the second phase; massdistribution, is however still not an opportunity. People need to understand the problems and why the politicians act as they do. If the people do not know the arguments behind the actions of the politicians, they may be a little confused.

This is where the traditional massmedia is more of a problem to the soceity than a positive force. First the media tried to kill me, then they have ostrazised me, what will the next be? It is absurd, in this very critical phase of democracy, the media tries to kill the guardian of society. How is a state supposed to work, if the media tries to kills its philosophers?

The state needs to do something, the media has morphed into something very dangerous, a threat to society, because of its vile actions and lack of integrity.

Darwin is an interesting person, so influential and yet simple in his way of thinking. As I see it, the return of biological science based on an Aristotelean empirical method is still in its infancy. With all respect to the extensive work done on the major universities in the West. He is a figure of vast discussion in the realm of metaphysics, because he was seen as an imposer to the throne of God. There are extensive fights fought especially in the US over the legacy of Darwin.

I try to heal the wound between physics and metaphysics, and let me underline my basic faithfullness to darwinism, his ideas were right, but he had only grasped some of the principles of nature, not all. So the problem with darwinism is actually not the questionmark put to metaphysics, but the lack of understanding of nature. According to the darwinist Geoffrey Miller, there are actually two principles in work in nature; survival of the fittest and sexual attraction. This is absolutely right, and if you compare his ideas to Empedochles, one the greatest natural scientist of antiquity, they both agree. Empedochles calls it love and strife, Darwin calls it survival of the fittest and sexual selection.

But there is a great difference between Empedochles and Darwin and that is the fact, that Empedochles has a much broader scope of natural principles to present than Darwin; the principles of attraction between living things, the search for justice and so on. To this you have to add the fact that Empedochles was a very religious man, he understood spirituality as a part of nature.

Read more…

The West is broken into two; atomic science and metaphysics.  The schisma goes deep, very deep. It goes all the way down to the very roots of western civilization. Two main roots is what we have; Mesopotamia and Egypt. In Mesopotamia natural science was born; biology, physics, astronomy, banking, writing and living in a city. The first city of Mesopotamia was called Eridu, or Eden in a biblical memory. It is still there, a lonely Ziggurat rising from earth, as a distant memory of past glories.

Egypt was the home of spirituality. One of the best sources to this amazingly beautiful culture is the Hermetica, a poem describing the truth of heaven and earth. It carries such beauty and elegance, that the modern world of corruption and Hip Hop reminds me of a tainted lake, difficult to bathe in, but nevertheless the bath I have to take everyday.

Today these traditions are, at one hand perfectioned in natural science; we fly to the moon, we make computers, we industrialize everything, everywhere. This credo is the cradle of civilization whereever the Anglo Saxons have put heir mark on the world; China, Japan, Australia, the US, South Korea, and so on. Industrialization have become a way of living, an empty sheath of mechanized marching. The paradox of it all in the former communist countries is the fact that communism is a copy of an egyptian tradition. Plato, who must have inspired Marx, copied his things from the Pythagoreans, a secret society with roots in Egypt. So the form of organization is originally created to preserve spirituality, but is today exactly the opposite, a spiritual mechanism aimed at materialism. I think this is one of the vices, and the ultimate downfall of the communists, you cannot worship money, it will give nothing but false living. This is one of the challenges of China, the quest for materialism is the quest for nothing. The virtues of family, trust, and spirituality is paramount.

Read more…

To understand the problems of the West, we have to dig deep, and see through the magnifying glasses of the scientists. Most people do not understand why things are falling apart, the ethics of the society is in decay, some grasp for answers in places of no real interest. But let us have a look on the basis of our society, and see if we can come up with some answers and some questions.

Our perception of the world here in the West is based upon Mesopotamic ideas. These ideas were conveyed into Hellas via philosophers as Animaxander, and again conveyed into modern life through the work of Lucretius, the Roman poet who based his view on nature on the famous Athenian philosopher Epicure.

Epicure saw the universe as a huge Lego playground. Everywhere there are atoms that combine into complex structures. This theory is today the basis of atomic physics; Niels Bohr, Einstein and so on. Seen from a moral and a spiritual point of view, this system leaves the world as a very boring place. In his own time Epicure was also held in a bit of disregard because his ideas made a world of boredom. In his famous “gardens” epicurans roamed, with only the purpose to satisfy their own needs. Not sexual needs, as we concluded with Freud, but the need of friendship and study. In the view of Epicuranism there is no life after death, only the dissolvation of the atoms each person is build of.

Read more…

The local election is over, some cry, some cheer. But all in all, it was a good thing for democracy to see how people and the powermongers take it serious and are uncorrupt in their handling of the system. The first winner is the democratic system itself, no fraud appeared. It was all conducted by local people who respected the groundrules of democracy. It is very cool, and beautiful.

As a see my role as a philosopher, I try to enlighten society, but through my knowledge of the basis of society I also try to inspire. Now, all political parties are heirs to philosophy in some way, both the danish, the foreign, the religious and the nonreligious. So we are all, in a way, the sons and daughters of  Plato. Therefor it is not my task to critizise the parties that are loyal to the heritage of western civilization, now including some who are of an eastern civilization. But only my task to critizise when parties are not loyal to truth, justice and love. When corruption of the fabric of the world occurs. So this is my humble contribution to the different parties of Denmark, a little inspiration. I start form left and go right.

Enhedslisten

Communists are not so popular these days. Perhaps because communism is flawed as a thought construct. It does not work, whereever international socialism is implemented, it fails. This does not imply that it does not have qualities, it has, social justice, enlightentment are good qualities of the socialist system. There have been traitors of Denmark among the communists, and this the communist have to face to get on. Also, the alliance with radical islam is also tearing the communists apart. There are parallel qualities between the original sharia state and communism, but the fact that radical islam is so inspired by Hitler and fascism, should make it the enemy of the communist, not the ally. There are very interesting signs of development in Iran, the people of Iran wants to be free, have democracy. If the communists could combine their moral nature with the values of democracy, it could move on and find find a new path. This was the original idea of Plato, so why not, the leap is not so long.

Read more…

Racisms is a word and a concept that is often used in the current discussions within society, but what is it really? And what is the history behind the concept?

Let us try to trace it back to its origin and discuss the concept of today. The focus on race started with Darwin. In his very famous book Origin of the species, he discussed the development of nature. The thoughts of Darwin have been reflected through the times, in according to the ethics of the time. Darwin published his work in the time of Victoria, so sex and the more profane nature of things was overlooked. It is a petty, because his main work was actually not on the selection by habitat, but selection by sexuality, or if you will love.

The unbalanced focus on the negative trends of nature; selection by strength or strife, led to an emphasis on the waraspect of nature. This was put into a social theoretical frame, that ultimately led to the racial theories of the Third Reich. The theory was, that not only animal races compete over ressources, but also human races do the same. As  a consequence of this idea, Hitler proclaimed that the aryan race was in war with the jewish race. The arabs really liked this idea, although they are very closely related to the jews. Both jews and arabs are semites. Read more…

When Mozart lived he had an opponent called Salieri. Mozart was the wonderkid, the genius who, with very little effort, produced the most spectacular and amazing pieces of classical music. Salieri was the mediocre composer who worked dilligently and hard, but all to no avail, the compositions he produced was just … boring. His intense jealousy towards Mozart is an example on the mediocres feelings towards the geniuses.

One of the problems with danish society today, is the fact that the Salieris have conquered the entire academic system, and through their dilligent and profound control, they ruin all beauty and development of society. Their insistence on the qualities of the multicultural society, their use of such fallacy as racism, islamophobia and other stupid ideas, puts up a veil in front of the basic ideas of a civilized state. Where is the insistence on truth and justice? Where is the stubborn defence of democracy and rule of law? The Salieris forgot it, and they are unable refind the focus on the basis of society.

Read more…

There is an ongoing war between the traditional media and the new media; the blogs. I initiated my career as a debater in the blogossphere, and most of my contacts are part of the blogossphere. This war is extremely decisive for the development of the society, so a discussion on the pro and cons of the new media is vital for the modern democracy.

Let us try to analyze, and see if we can find any qualities of the two, and perhaps some of the new interactive trends.

First of all; there is a tremendous gap of quality between the old and the new media. The discussion on blogs as Gates of Vienna, Uriasposten, and the content of Snaphanen, and Zonkas blog are way better that any of the old media. There are exceptions, the show Deadline in national television is quite good, and some of the content in the newspaper Jyllandsposten is also quite good.

So the blogs have given the avantgarde intellectuals a space to develop new ideas and distribute the ideas in a fast and free way. This is very good for the democracy, the more debate, the more reflection on a serious level, the better for the society. The backside of the new media is however a low level of massdistribution. There are many readers on the major blogs, but it is only people who are very interested in politics that read the blogs. People who are interested in clothing, shoes, parashuting, they watch television.

You may add, that there is a third media that is much more powerful than the new and the old media; rumors. The spread of knowledge through discussion in home and between friends. This type of communication is actually what really matters. The blogs in combination with rumorspreading, is actually the main communication on important issues today. An example;  together with Anders Gravers of Stop Islamization of Denmark i devised an intellectual defense of Denmark, I put democracy and the rule of law in opposition to sharia. This paradigm is today a given fact whereever you go and discuss with people. I have talked with Steen from the blog Snaphanen.dk, and he has the same experience. You put something on your blog, and after a very short time the whole world reflects on it. It is extremely powerful.

Read more…

One might wonder; is there a life after death? The current philosophical dogma deriving, as I see it, from the Epicuran renaissance, says no. Epicuran doctrine holds the atomic build of the world as a base of philosophy. The tradition was conveyed through a roman philosopher/didactic called Lucretius. In the philosophy there is no God, religion is a bad thing, and personal needs is all there is to guide a soul.

In the natural sciences these basic principles of the atomic theory have been prooved to a very sophisticated level. Smaller and smaller parts of the atom is aknowledged. But is it true that all spirituality is of no relevance and untrue? Well, nobody knows, yet. There are plenty of room for discovery, the aetherical dimension described in the metaphysical litterature could be another dimension and therefor true. The connection between the realm of God and man, conveyed through the soul could be a connection to another dimension that we are only able to reach through inner contemplation. It is possible, and the atomic science is not a hinderance to this theory. There are other mysteries that are impossible to explain, like time. Perhaps time is not linear but cyclical, it could be, the theory is discussable.

Read more…

I die, you live, that is the basic law of nature. As a habitat is crowded with species that are competing over ressources and space, the fight becomes fiercer and more violent. This is the problem of the planet, the race of man competes over ressources and territory. Now who will win? The strongest will win. There is a lot of corruption and rot in the western world, especially in the ruling elite. Some elites are more rotten than other. Consequently some elites are weaker than other.

Empedocles claims, that fire has a twofold nature; Hades and Hephaestus. Hades is the God of destruction and death, nothing good comes from him. But Hephaestus is the lover of Aphrodite. Through the combination of love and strife nature evolves. So it is with the western world, some states develop in an amazing speed, some die. Denmark and Sweden are the focalpoints of this development. Hades rules in Sweden, Hephaestus rules in Denmark. Why, because the elite in Sweden is absoluty corrupt, moral wise and intellectually. In Denmark, the corrupt are having problems, as Seidenfaden, the corrupt editor of the newspaper Politiken is having right now. In Denmark the good laugh and the evil cry, in Sweden the good cry and the evil laugh.

Read more…

We are a generation with the opportunity to rebuild the country. Through the seventies, eighties, nineties, and the last nine years, nationalism has been a creed of a despicabel nature. At least this was the attitude of the elite; the media elite, the cultural elite and a great part of the political elite. Cosmopolitanism has been all the rage. Things are now changing, nationalism is more popular. After forty years loyalty to the country is in fashion again.

The thing is, there is a long way to go, to refind a positive image of Denmark, and what it is to be a dane. We are lucky because we have Grundtvig, the national poet and philosopher of Denmark. To refind his beautiful and amazing system of belief will be like a cleansening shower on a day of spring. The insanity of the current intellectual trends are like poison to the mind; jaded socialism, imbecile multuculturalism, economical/philosophical rule of law. No, we need to rebuild the nation on enlightentment of the soul, the soul of men and women, but also the soul of the people.

Now, there are traitors among us, let me explain. In the seventies, just before the Berlin wall fell, as a last desperate move into Europe, the Soviet Union put all their efforts into proselytizing and wooing the elite of the european countries. The secret service, the KGB, did their very best to infiltrate and move people to communism. We had the atomic free zone movement, probably controlled by the KGB. We had the red stocking movement, why?

Read more…

I have a really cool friend, he is from France and he is all about wine, the history of the different sorts of strange beverages of Tolouse and so on. He is into the different strategies of the french colonial powers, the history of France, and the current strategies of EU. EU is largely run by France, so a french perspective on the megelomanic, corrupt, undemocratic french system is enlightening.

One of the main competitions of today, is the competition between danish and french intellectualism. Denmark have a lot of followers, and France just control the core of the EU state. One of the good things about France is the respect for culture. Everything in France is culture, the way you eat, fight, do politics and talk. It is not about the money, it is about the cultural capital. This puts the philosophers in an elevated state, they are not, as in Denmark, treated as dangerous creatures to either kill, or at least ignore. Levi- Strauss the jewish french philosopher of a very high quality was respected in France as Glucksmann is today. Me, the danish jewish philosopher is NOT respected.

Read more…

Not only Denmark but the entire Western World is under siege. The strategy is that of a Trojan horse. A seemingly harmless body of something has stealthely been placed in the middle of the village. Slowly it has dawned upon us, that the helpless immigrants the left and the elite so valiantly defended, are not so helpless anyway. Now the menu is rape, lying, stealing, burning, ravaging, marauding. The Trojan horse is opening, spilling its foul content into our society.

Now, what to do? First of all we should realise our own mistakes and fix them as fast as possible. Our mistake has been to be irresponsible to the mechanism of the state. The state is based on loyalty of the citizens to the base of the state. The base of the state is democracy and rule of law.

The state has a very effective and intelligent tool to protect itself from foreigners who try to exploit the state. It is called the citizensship. Only people who are citizens can enjoy the ressources and the protection of the state. It is our backup as danes. The state is our communal ressources, we lift together. If, however, the state is corrupted by leaders who do not respect the distinction between citizens and foreigners, the citizens are unprotected. The danes are unprotected today, because the state do not distinguish between citizens and noncitizens. As a consequence of this, we have a civil system where employees, teachers, pupils are mixed together citizens and noncitizens alike. This leads to total breakdown of society where it happens. I have seen it where I live. Rapewaves, stealing, intimidation, tyranny.

Read more…

With the revelation by Mr. Andrew Neather, advisor and speechwriter for Labour under Mr. Tony Blair, the nightmare of Europe seems to take another turn. My analysis of the situation has, for long, seemed like a conspiracy theory. My theory was, that the immigration policy of Europe was a deliberate attempt of the European federal system to mix the nationalistic citizens of each nationstate with foreigners. The supposed outcome would be a less nationalistic civil body of europeans. I based this analysis on the fact that the immigration into Europe was actively supported in unison. All the countries of the European Union forced the immigration on the hapless citizens of each european country. It happened in England, it happened in Denmark, it happened in Sweden, The Netherland, Germany. The “globalization” must have been a planned process, not a natural effect of some hidden force.

I search for the truth, and often, I admit, I am suprised by the conclusions of my analysis. Because who would think that anybody could devise such a plan, without any knowledge coming out to the public? Well it is absurd, but it is however the way things have been run in England. The conspiracy theory was not just a theory after all, it was a deliberate attempt to change the very structure of the english citizenry. It is prophesized, that before the armageddon a time of corruption and stupidity will occur. This is now, because it just does not work to change the citizens of a state with another body of citizens. The state is not the bureaucratic structure, it is the values and the culture of the citizens. If the citizens behave in a democratic manner, the state is democratic, if the citizens behave in a islamic manner, the state is islamic.

Read more…

To devise a warstrategy is a very creative process, there are rules to abide, as they are proscribed by great thinkers as Carl von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. The essence of war is the morale. You only get people to fight and risk their life if they fight for a higher purpose. The higher the quality of the purpose, the higher the soldiers are motivated. When the soldiers of Germany under Bismarck fought, it was with the motto “Gott mit uns”, God are with us, there is no other more motivating factor than the fight for God.

Now, some of my contacts have tried to convince me to fight as secret services fight, by demoralising the enemy. Well, first of all, I am not in the secret service business. Yes the work I have done so far have put me in contact with the secret service on many levels, but it is only because the official state has tried to kill me, and I have therefor been forced underground. My place, and my fight, is as a servant of the state. My job is to uphold and defend democracy and the rule of law.

Read more…

To make an interview with a person of a jewish background on the situation of the jews, in Denmark, right now, is very depressing. Not only because the development of the society runs on lines that will ultimately end in another Holocuast, but also because of the immense betrayal of the media elite and the cultural elite against the jews and the danes.

These issues, and other, are discussed with Mr. Geoffrey Cain, and can be heard by pressing the interview in the radiobox in the top right corner of the internetpage. Mr. Geoffrey Cain is a both an active debater and a very knowledged person when it comes to the discussion concerning jews, danes and muslims in Denmark. Cain has written quite a few books, one on the defaming of the leader of the party “Dansk Folkeparti”, “Danish Peoples Party” in english, an other intellectual works.

It is quite enligthning to listen to the words of Geoffrey, few are as courageos and stubborn as he is, always trying to get the truth out.

App. 150 years ago this amazing new trend started in Copenhagen, it had all the typical trends of a jewish development; radical intellectualism, full of conflict, individualism, extremism in its time. It was lead by an intellectual beacon called Brandes. He was there, whipping up the waves in the duckpond, hated and admired in his time.

His brother started a new political party called “Det Radikale Venstre”, and Brandes started a newspaper called “Politiken”. The tradition continued with his heir Poul Henningsen who were as creative as Brandes and perhaps a bit more ethical. When the nazis gained in power he was one of the first to challenge their ideology, and as one of the very ungraceful moments of Politiken he got fired. But Poul Henningsen survived, he went to Sweden and returned to Denmark after the war, where he, as the only one, critizised the danish people because he thought they treated the german refugees in a unhospitable manner.

This is the tradition I have been brought up with, my heroes so to say. They were the Socrateses of their time. Now the absurd tradegy of today is that Seidenfaden, who is the most vile and antiisraeletic person in Denmark is the editor of Politiken. He has followed the party into its grave. Ten or twenty years ago the party and the newspaper were extremely respected because they somehow managed to be friends with both sides of the left/right spectrum of politics. Ok, some critisized it, but the intellectual level of the party was always respected, and Politiken with its history of uncompromising intellectualism, was newspaper number one, when it came to intellectual respect and integrity.

Read more…

The current threat of Islam is much more dangerous than we think. Two different trends are at work at once. Firstly the threat of Islam itself, a very cunning enemy. But it coincides with another megatrend that is yet to be even realized. We have seen it twice in the history of western civilization. Firstly at the fall of Athens and secondly at transversion of Rome from a republic to an empire.

The principle behind the change lies as a weakness within democracy. Too much freedom, if not balanced with responsibility, leads to moral corruption. The process is described very well in the platonic dialogue “The state”, and it is quite clear that we as a civilization is on that very last stage of democratic decadence. Nobody respects the teachers, the respect for law is lessened, there is no distinction between citizen and non citizen, all are annoying, as Plato says, even the animals are annoying.

Before the fall of the Roman Republic it must have been the same. Julius Caesar fought his way into Rome and changed the constitution because of the moral corruption and decadence of the Roman Republic. His heir Augustus was the sponsor of  the poet Virgil who tried to build a new roman ethics.

Read more…

The cynisism and the ethical nature of the current cultural elite is so depressing. The new strategy of the jihadis is conversion by love. The young muslim boys try to find young danish girls and lure them into Islam. This is just a rumour, but the trend is quite clear. I have a friend who were targeted, and I see a clear rise in couples of muslim boys and danish girls in my neigbourhood. Its not a scientific proof, but the trend is there.

Now, who are the targets of the love dawa of the muslim boys? It is the daughters of the liberal establishment. All the socialists, the “kulturradikale”, might very well end up with a daughter who is converted by a hardcore muslim. So far its all hunky dory, multicultural bliss. But what happens when the daughter is forced to wear a hijab? Is it then hunky dory? Probably not.

Read more…

All philosophy should be seen in the light of nature. We are just another species on the beautiful planet earth. The aim of the human race is to live in harmony with itself, and with the nature around it. Some work with nature, some against it. And always when you work against nature, you are doomed to live an unhappy live. This is very much the basis of human thought. Going back to classical Rome, Greece, Mesopotamia and perhaps Egypt.

Now let us have a look on the current political trends, and their relation to nature. Let us have a look on the insidious Seidenfaden and his allies. The current strategy of the muslim expansion is babybooming. This might be a conscious strategy, or just the effect of poverty. But the fact is, that most muslim countries are so poor due to mismanagement that babies are everywhere. In fact the greatest threat to humanity, yes in fact to the entire ecosystem, is the babyboom of the muslim countries. These “minorities” are eating the ground bare whereever they are. This is the greatest threat to nature there is and have ever been. The current number of humans on earth are skyrocketing, and the speed of babies coming alive is staggering. It will lead to war, because there are simply not enough ressources to feed and house all the individuals that are emerging everyday.

Read more…

The journalists have as a class ostraziced me due to political reasons. Unfortunately there has been a corruption of the danish journalists over the last two or three decades. Statistically a great part of the danish journalists are leftwing or liberal. This is off cause a major problem for the society, that the balance is so bad, but it also is a professional problem for the journalists.

Let me explain.

There is the saying that if you are not a communist as a young person you have no heart, and if you are not a conservative as an old person, you have no brain.

This is all very true with the journalists, they have a lot of heart, but very little brain. Now, they use all their heart on the muslims, whom are very happy to use all the stupid but heartful journalists. Not because they like them, but because they would feel otherwise stupid not to use such a golden opportunity. But behind doors, there is not much respect for the leftwing journalists, they despise them for their treachery of their own people. Nobody likes a traitor.

Read more…

To build a society with harmony between nature and man, you have to be a master architect, yes you may even have to be a philosopher. There is an aura of respect surrounding the philosophers of history, we remember them; Plato, Rousseau, Marcus Aurelius, Kirkegaard. Why, because they studied the intricate design of human beings and their relationship to nature, and gave us guiding lines to follow. Now, the level of thinking has been reduced to almost babble today. Philosophy is not, as in ancient times, seen as a source of clarity, the philosophers of today tend to obscure their thoughts behind a veil of strange words. This is really the times of obscurity and corruption. Look at the young, they worship pimps and prostitutes through their love of hip hop. How low have we fallen here in the West? The society tries to kill the philosopher and worships the pimp. This is truly a time of embarrassment and decadence.

Now there are two great figures of thought here in Denmark, competing; Karl Marx and Grundtvig. We even have a party who mix the thoughts of the two great thinkers; Socialistic Folkparty. Let us have a look at the two, and see if we can somehow understand the commonalities of the two intertwining ideas.

Read more…

In my philosophical tradition, the grundtvigian, we use a lot of energy on the bloodlines of the different folks around the world, and especially on the tribes we are part of. This tradition has been miscredited, with good reason, because of Nazigermany. Luckily the danish version of the folk/theoretical tradition was not antisemitic, antidemocratic, on the opposite it accepted the jews (my great grandfather who was a jew, was a pupil of Grundtvig) and it turned very democratic.

This is because the original traditions of the northern man, that is the tribes of Norway, the Goths (Sweden), the Danes, the Anglo Saxons, some of the german tribes were democratic before the catholic church started to control the free spirited warriors of north.

The system was called a “Freestate”. Every year the tall fighters would set sail and meet at thinge at Isøre. Here they would discuss subjecst, choose new kings, perhaps find a spouse, and they would fight out what fights that were upcoming, doing the Holmgang. Now it was not all free, there was something that was extremely binding, in the middle of the Allthing there would be an ornamented rock, it was called the lawstone. If you swore an oath on this stone, it was binding. We still have this saying in Denmark; “a man is man and a word is a word”.

In this way the society had both freedom and responsability. All members of society were free in the democratic process, but bound by the lore of the lawstone.

Read more…

When I was a small kid my grandfather Gunnar Engberg had this mission with me, he always gave me texts to inspire. I had Skalk a historical magazine, I had different stories of ancient danish mythology; Stærkodder, Valdemar and other viking warriors. But there was this story, that was the most important; the cave allegory of Plato. The quest for the philosopher to bring truth and light into the end of the cave. This story has always been the guiding principle of my life. I remember when I reread it in the platonic dialogue; The state. It really hit me hard, it is the foundation of westerns society, we call it; folkenlightentment, glasnost, or just enlightentment.

My grandfather was a special character, he had his whole life wanted to work as a teacher in the danish Højskole, a speciel tradition of Denmark. Together with my grandmother Rigmor,  they really worked to enlighten the danish people and the soul of the danes. Now, I was chosen to work on that tradition, to make it into something that would work in the time I was brought up in.

After many years trying to escape this calling, I finally realized that I could do nothing else than respect my heritage and uphold the tradition of folk enlightentment.

I began as a rebel, after writing my first book, I joined the organization “Stop Islamization of Denmark”. Why? Obviously because anyone with half an eye could see that the fight between the west and the muslim east is the fight of today. I knew that if I went into the open, I would be killed. It was what happened in The Netherlands, here Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh was murdered by the media and the corrupt socialist in collaboration with radical muslims.

Read more…

It has now been two weeks since I sent my note to the danish media. It is sad, but none has happened, well yes, a few lame excuses, but most did´nt even care to give a small notice back.

We are on the advent of another Holocaust. It is so very easy to realise if you put together the different factors of the current social development; the rise of Hamas here in Denmark, the open naziideology of Hamas, the tacit acceptance by the media of Hamas, often the direct support by the media. The conclusion is quite clear; it will be a situation were the jews will be prosecuted, killed, and forced to leave the country.

And the reversal of this process is so easy to make. All you have to do is to scrutinize the makings of Hamas. Listen to their plans, put them out in the open.

This is the voice of the media…:

Read more…

Many have wondered what to do in the current world crisis? A few days ago I attented a small seminar with the chairman of the Free Speech Society Mr. Lars Hedegaard. He has just released a very good book on the clash between the West and Islam. There is no doubt, it is a war, and we should start to realise it, otherwise we will loose. But what are the means, the tools in the toolbox for the defenders of the West? Well, that is the difficult point right now, please read through these reflections done by Jung on the issue. It is not aimed at Islam but at the communists, but the principles are the same.

“The West has unfortunately not yet woken up to the fact that our appeal to idealism and reason and other desireable virtues, delivered with so much enthusiasm, is mere bombination in the void. It is a puff of wind swept away in the storm of religious faith, however twisted this faith may appear to us. Read more…

The great hype these days within academia is on enviromental issues. Especially here in Denmark. Consequently a  lot of my friends talk about issues as; sustianble psysichal environment, social environment, it even goes into art, urban planning, and a number of other issues. There is however one problem, and that is the simple fact, that they have absolutely no idea about what they are talking about.

If you try to understand man in relation to nature, your first step should be to understand nature. Anyway to grasp the connection between man and nature, you naturally have to see the nature in a darwinian perspective. Darwins ideas are, to this day, unrivalled in the field of human/natural exchange. Or rather the way man interact with nature, and is interacted upon.

Read more…

The radical liberals are just unknowing pawns in a game. The obvious lack of congruenty within their theory really makes them an obviously stupid piece in the chessgame that someone moves around. I mean, just imagine the lack of congruenty between the alledged “fight against fascism” and their obvious fascist ways, or their “fight against antisemitism”, fighting the jews, or the “fight for democracy” breaking the law. If you have just a little intelligence, you would realize that someone is fooling around with you. The wise fools the unwise.

Now the radical liberals may think that I am trying to fool them in a devious way, I´m not ok?

Lets have a look on the possible manipulaters of the radical liberals. One sign is quite obvious; the pirates sign; skull and bone. This sign was also the sign of the SS and the sign of a chapter in one of the freemanson chapters. There could be a clue.

Read more…

I have a funny relationship with the very radical liberals of Denmark. They have tried twice to kill me, and quite a few of my friends are radical liberals. In fact in many ways I actually uphold the ideals of the radical liberals; I combat antisemitism, I combat nazism and fascism.

Then how can it be, that the the radical liberals, (the autonome) really hate me to an absurd degree? There is a psychological explanation, that I think can explain some of the hatred and vileness of the autonome. According to the psychologist Jung every man has a “shadow”. The shadow is the moral things that the person do not like about themselves. To be aware of your own shadow, you have to have a very high degree of selfacknowledgement. If not, the shadow will materialize in the real world as “projections”. You find someone, or something to put all your bad emotions on. It is also called a scapegoat. Usually the scapegoat is a weak person or thing that cannot fight back, and only serves as a medium for the vileness of a given person og group of persons.

Now, the autonome have blamed me and the group “Stop Islamization of Denmark” of being fascists, racists and I particularly was labeled as nazist.

Read more…

What is it to be a citizen? I have discussed the subject with Mr. Victor David Hanson, and we agree that one of the major problems with the “multicultural” state is the fact that the theoretical trends simply ignore the basis of state theory.

According to Aristotle, to be a citizen you have to be able to participate in the legal and democratic proces of the state. In other words, before you start to discuss minorities, racism, and so on, you have to base these discussions of their relation to law and democracy. It is possible to do that, but it is not done. Consequently the discussion is simply flowing around in limbo.

The practical consequences are devastating in the realms of multiculture. In these areas there are no real consequence for perpetrators of the very foundation of the state. We in Denmark have islamic/nazists who roam untouched. Why? Because it would be racist to tackle them. Here the multicultural ideology trumphs the very basis of the state. This eventually leads to chaos.

Read more…