To understand the german folkpsyche, you have to understand, that this collection of people is a grand collaboration primed in the deep forest of the land. Seen from a danish perspective, we are always awed by the sheer grandiosity of the project; the scope, the depth, the magnamity of that old and fierce people.
We should not forget, that the germans and the danes share a common destiny. When Germany was run over by the franks, the german kings fled to Denmark. When Eastern Germany was occupied by the russians, Denmark represented a dream to strive for, a moment of normality germans could warm their hearts on. We, as danes, recognices this, we cherish it. We know that the germans were manipulated and forgetful in the times of the nazis, but the very core of german thought is a deep as deepest lake in the county of Baden-Württemberg. It has layers upon layers of wisdom that you cannot understand if you are not german; Sigfried, Brünhilde, all these myths of yore are the might of the german folksoul.
Things change however, and the ideas of yesterday are the projects of tomorrow. Somehow Germany should rise again as bird Phoenix, yet again a country of yearning and beauty.
Read more…
We have to be realistic about the demise of the West, the consequences and the repercussions. Yes, the West did a lot of awfull deeds in the past; Congo, China, South America but the tide has turned, the wrong deeds are payed back, and it is time the West should start fending for itself again. As Obama did in the Libya war, where he fought for the colours of the West. The demoralization the West suffered after the colonial times and as a means of the cold war, have to stop.
Looking at the pro and cons of world hegemony, the West must choose its way carefully. The Libyan war was wise, it left the Arab world as friends, because we chose a path of justice. We never once tried to overburden the libyaese with the rule of the strong, but we kept a promise of help, a claim of solidarity.
Now, this war is more or less over. Still there are some disperse fighting, and Gadaffi must go, but it is time to look upon the world scene with fresh eyes.
Read more…
The realization of the basic nature of jewish lore and idea should be combined with day to day actions. Otherwise it is just ideas thrown into the depth of the internet.
To realize the combined task of the jews is to realize the twin tasks of Egypt and Babylon; as Babylon was the cradle of democracy, Egypt was the cradle of much spirituality, and other items of human civilization.
Perhaps it was after we were expelled from Egypt, that we were given the taks of enlightening the world, but it is originally egyptian lore propagated by the heliopolian priests.
However the combination of democratic lore; Abraham and egytian lore; Moses, will give the path as to how we will prevail in some of the conflicts that will arise.
It is all about nature. Nature is propelled by strife and love. If we do not react on anything, we will be, as all nature around us, pushed from love to strife to love to strife. To break that dynamic, we need to be wise. This is where the enlightening ideas are actually the basic idea we can use to break the dynamics. Because, enlightenment is to see things as they are. Strife is all about lies and darkness, love is all about being true.
Read more…
When we try to delve into the very fabric of the universe, we often take a wrong turn, we misunderstand, only through knowledge are we actually able to discern the truth. We have discussed right and wrong, what are these entities, and what do they mean in the great score of mankinds endeavour into spirit and beauty?
First of all; we need to understand evil in ourselves. According to C.G. Jung, every man has a shadow. A shadow is the unconscious part of man, the part where needs and motivation often derive and excell. Often the dark side of the human expells reason, and this is when we as human beings rape, steal, mutilates and massacres. But mostly the dark side of humanity only leaves as projections onto others. Others are put to hate, as the inferiority complexes or the shadow of collective unconscious, externalize its own shortcomings. Jews are often the scapegoat, so we know what it is to be the laughing stock and the simple means of projections.
Read more…
The discussion between right and wrong, and light and dark is necessary to understand in order to bring peace. First of all; Love is not the only ingredient in man, there is also the shadow, the evil in man. So, to make a world where love reigns, we have to understand the evil in man, to live with the shadow.
A good example of evil in Denmark, is the abduction of little girls into marriage with islamic supremacists. The girls are from fourteen to eighteen years old, and therefor not able to use reason.
The way it happens is simple and corrupt. The little girls are enticed by promises and gifts, but after marriage they have to adhere under the strict laws of Islam. They cannot and are punished.
The punishment are often severe, in extreme cases torture and death.
What is wrong here? Several things; the lack of respect for the girls from the islamic parents, the seduction of the young boys, the immorality of the girls, the lack of tutelage of the girls parents. All combines into a situation where all come to grief.
Read more…
We wander i silence as when it comes to the acknowledgement of what we are. We are trapped in matter, but soon released as when we whither.
As Rex posed the question; what is love? It should be answered whith a; love is a function of the divine. What is the divine? The divine is the intelligence that sorrounds us all. It is the soup of knowledge that is ammased in the space between matter. What does that have to do with love. Well, perhaps an answer to that could be that love is really an urge to refind the state we are in when we are part of the divine.
If we are but small pieces of intelligence, we might still remember when we were a part of the natural force called intelligence. Love is just that, the urge to reconnect to the intelligence. We can do that in two modes; as a bonding with other living beings, or in the love of G-d. The love of G-d is actually the most direct route to love, because it is an inner sense that will reconnect you, to what we really are.
Read more…
To try to understand the relationship between love, nation, law and chaos, we need to understand nature.
Nature is, as Rex says, G-d. G-d is, in the light of Anaxagoras, the intelligence that sourrounds us everywhere. It penetrates the very fabric of the universe, as a dance through matter.
We as humans are but the very fragrance of G-d, as it inhales and exhales the spirit from matter to home in oneness, we as life are the breath.
We strive however. And how is that to be? Well as both Darwin and Empedochles holds; we strive because strive is a motor of nature.
Striving is there, and perphaps it is just the effect of intelligence as it is trapped in the diminishing fleshy prison of matter. It is just there, isolated and consequently seperated from G-d, roving in its blindness through the realms of mechanical stupidity.
But strive is there, and it is the task of the humane organization to counter the vile trappings of egoism and murder.
Read more…
To understand the relationship between love, democracy and law, one has to understand the starting point of the Abrahamic religions; Mesopotamia and Babylon.
Babylon was a city, a sprawling megacity of the ancient semitic world. It had towering leaders as Nebuchanezzar and Hammurabi. The fertile crescent was the very birth of mankinds knowledge, yes Egypt also provided some of the basic bricks of mankinds repository, but the control system; democracy is invented in Mesopotamia.
Now the assyrian, phoenician and jewish states had a central government based on a triangulation of power. The idea, brought to Hellas and formulated by philosophers as Polybius and Plato, was that states wanders through a circle; from kingdom to aristocray to democracy. Therefor combining all three modes of government in one was the ultimate.
Read more…
The mass media is the modern version of an evil tyrant. It works its evil ways in a simple equation, that will hold it unaccountable for its corrupt deeds, and yet present it as shining beacon of truth. It is non of the above, it is a simple means of corruption and oppression, and all who hold democracy dear should embatter it, should fight it, should stand on that last impregnable barricade called truth and light.
We are warriors of light, and we fight to spread the truth onto shores far away, we grasp, with stubborn and yet feeble hands that torch of light. The good news are; we are in the game again, because the media have changed, and it gives us the possibility to regroup, to rearrange our ressources, to put forth new fighters in the foray.
This is an idea as to how to break that corrupt tower of control called biased mass media.
How does it work?
It works by excluding some and including some other. Evil persons of no real intelligence are put forth as “enlighteners”, persons as Naser Khader. Khader is a nice person, but how on earth did anyone believe him to anything than a puppet of the mass media?
And it works by excluding others, persons as Lars Løkke Rasmussen. Why do the media not propagate his feats? Why have we heard nothing of all his courageous deeds? Because he is excluded by the mass media. He is not supposed to win anything, he is supposed to loose. And the mass media does the deed by excluding.
Read more…
To put forth a prophesy is a folly, nobody can know what the future will tell. Only intelligence might show a way for a little premonition. I hope that the conservative/liberal/socialist-nationalist government we have today will continue. Do not misunderstand, I like and respect the Socialist Folkeparty, especially Mr. Ole Sohn who, as former chairman of the communist party have had the chance to reform, and does a islamic critique I like and is in line with the enlightening principles of Glasnost.
I however dislike Ms. Helle Thorning Schmidt, the chairman of Socialist Democratic party. She is not suited for the job as primeminister, becuase she simply does not have the skills to do the job. According to Henrik Dahl, a very skilled theoretician who has worked together with her, she does not have the analytical and creative skills needed as a prime minister.
In the next years one thing is almost for certain; change will come. What we think is normal today will be strange and old fashioned tomorrow, that is as the world ticks around.
In this volatile situation, an unskilled primeminister will be a catastrophe for the country, and we need to change the course of events so that she does end up entagled in power without the skills to use it in any serious way.
Therefor I support Lars Løkke, the current prime minister, because he is simply the better man for the job.
Read more…
To sail around the globe as an unwanted passanger aboard a boat without any guiding star, is to be lost. So are we in the West, lost without any stars to guide us anymore. Who are we? What are we supposed to do? What is it to be a dane, a jew, an englishman?
Well the good thing about being in loss of identity is the possibility to grow something new, something that might draw on old traditions and yet be better for the future.
What are we?
As danes and englishmen we have always been sailors. Since the time of Harald Blåtand and Knud den store (Canute) we have prowled the mighty seas of the world, from Skagerak to the Red sea, from around Cape Horn to Valparaiso. As sailors have we learned the lesson of the sea. We have felt the wrath of the storm, the bliss of the morning sun setting upon our tried brows. Upon those lessons have we learned the wisdom of today. We know that we have to work together to set sail and reach port. We know we have to be stoic and honest as captains of each our boat. The lesson of sea so uncompromising have shown us a way to live with our peers in respect.
Read more…
To define what is, one has to know the way of the world, one has to know how the universe functions. Many misunderstandings have flown through mankinds mutual understanding the last 5 – 7000 years. We reached peaks under the Babylonian empire, under the pharaos, peaks that were synchronized under the hellenes, in their short but wondoruos flight. But today we live in the dark ages. We tell ourselves that we are enlightened, that we are living in the age of knowledge, this is all a lie. Nothing works in our world. Take a look on Europe; fighting, rape and mismanagement is the daily course of this once amazing continent. The leaders build castles of rot, fight the people, the people are all in the clutches of tyranny and dumbing down, G-d has fallen.
It all comes down to negligence, and rot in the sphere of humanism and knowledge. Why do people not question the ideas og Nietzsche and Marx anymore? Why do we simply lumber along, turn on the television when we come home from a hard days work; because we are living in the dark ages, and we know nothing better than to embrace theoretical and practical stupidity. All we live on is bread and theater, we live to be entertained, and not to seek salvation, love, solidarity, creation or simply to embrace the man beside us whom we are strangers to, not brothers to. Brotherhood a long forgotten remnant of a distant time we only remember in our dreams.
This tide has to be turned if we are to become a human race again. It can be done by hard work and by prove. We need to fight the fight of solidarity and love, because this fight is what brings us closer to G-d.
Read more…
The egyptian ideas of illumination and justice are very difficult to reach, the basic problem is the understanding of these beautiful ideas. We strive, we think, we struggle to be as they were, but we are but meagre shadows compared to the giants who built the pyramids, the amazing maze of antiquity, the lore of today. But we have the chance today, because of the internet, because of the beauty of mankind, that perhaps will reach the knowledge we have lost. We are all one they used to say, because they understood the metaphysical realm. In that realm we all are connected through the intelligence of G-d. As people we are just individualized and ourselves, the idiosyncricity, the egoism the creed of the modern man.
To span that gap between materialism and the oneness of all is so difficult because we are brought into chains by the material world. What can we do? The best answer is; education. We need to spread the word of spirit, we need to show people the knowledge we have lost in the graves of Pharao, and in the destruction of Babylon. The need to make a rebirth to all the ideas we used to take for granted.
Read more…
The traditional danish political party Venstre (the left), is a party with ancient roots. It all began with the amazing traditions of Grundtvig, who created the unique democratic model of Denmark. Most city dwellers have no idea about the elaborate and beautiful system of Grundtvig, all they know is their provincial cosmopolitanism. But the ruling party of Denmark know their roots very well. They are the enheritors of this system.
Now Venstre is in a bit of a danger. The party has had the power for very long, and most of the projects it started out to do are done, new projects has to be invented on the spot, to put the steam on the engine.
The opponents are scared and weak, mostly because their ideology have fallen, and the demoralization is apparent. So their turf is open for conquest. What is it that most socialist voters want the socialist to do? Create new development in the social sector. The social sector or the wealtfarestate is a socialist construction, and consequently loyal to the socialist. This gives Venstre a difficult task in regard to the development of the wealthfarestate.
But is there a solution that can use the legacy of Venstre, the theory of Grundtvig? Yes, off cause there is, Grundtvig made a system so detailed and elaborate that all important aspect of society is reflected in his ideology. We can go back and be inspired.
Grundtvig made the højskole after he returned from Oxford. In Oxford Grundtvig realized that Denmark is not so uniqe after all. Oxford is an amazing construct build upon platonic excellency and hellenic wisdom, Grundtvig realized this. He also realized that the system Oxford was made upon; Sparta, is a system worth following. Oxford is build as a polis with a spartanic basis. All students and teachers meet in the mass with every meal. Here they talk and commune. The ideals of Sparta and Plato are also in action at Oxford; freedom of speech and virtue.
Read more…
To try to understand the current events in the Middle East, one has to dig deep into to the collective consciousness of mankind. What happens now is the result of a unending proces from the days of Abraham to today, the proces of illumination from the metaphysical realm to the human. As an alledged Anaxagorean, the philosopher who preceded Plato and Aristotle, I believe that the realm of G-d is intelligence. People talk about vibrations as G-d, but the arguments Anaxagoras put forth are both deeper and more logical. We live with the creative part of G-d, the demiurge as the most valued reflection of G-d, but we miss what is the true core of spirituality; love.
Now some call the jews G-ds chosen people. This is only true if the jews actually folow the spirit in action. If spirit is love and creation, only through these methods will the jews truly be the chosen people of G-d, otherwise it is nothing but arrogance to be seen as something else.
I do not claim to be hundred percent jewish, my father was an arab, and my mother was a christianized jew. But I do claim the heritage of Abraham, because this inheritance is not only for the jews to carry. This gift is a gift given to all decendants of Abraham, and it would be arrogant for the jews to claim Abraham as their sole possesion. He gave us something we all need to do to be enlightened; he gave us the path to true freedom and meaning; the path of selfsacrifising love.
Read more…
To understand the implications of the courtcase of Lars Hedegaard. The interview I conducted and consequently had as an awful stalker, stalking my life, you have to understand the intellectual construct in the interview and the following consequences.
Now, the interview was a socratic interview. The theory behind the socratic interview is what lies at the basis of intellectual pursuit in most fields. To search for truth in speech. Socrates idea was, that truth cannot be found in personal intellectual pursuit only, but through dialogue. The truth is relative to the situation and the persons in the dialogue. Jürgen Habermas, an alleged socratic, takes this ideal even further, he believes, that the truth can be found only in a dialogue where everybody, the entire humanity, discuss a subject.
Now, I tried to remake the socratic interview, with Lars Hedegaard, because we need to make an renaissance, to refind the basic principles of our society again.
Freedom of speech lies as such a principle in our society, and the reason why it is so dear to us, is the fact that the socratic method can only work if we have freedom of speech. Socrates founded not only modern science, but also defined the ideals of the press through Voltaire.
Read more…
To be a democrat is not easy, especially these days, where strange theories are cluttering the hemisphere of the west; liberalism all in the clutches of money, conservatism with has an “international” outview, socialism with no real connection to the poor.
What can we do, to solve the crisis we are in? Well, there is a simple solution to the problem of moral corruption, that we are all emerged in; do as we preach. We want the rest of the world to show solidarity; do it youself. We want the rest of the world to be free; fight for freedom in your own country. We want justice for the Middle East, give justice to the intellectuals, to the man on the street, to the empirebuilder, to John, Margereth, Ole, Svend and Lars in your own country.
Do it yourself.
This simple remedy will take us away from the moral corruption we face, because, the problem we have, is not in everybody else in the world, it is not solely the islamist, it is when we ourselves do not behave according to our own principles of behaviour that things go wrong.
We need more work in Denmark, the solution is simple; the work the danish companies order should be done in Denmark. We need more solidarity, well, embrace all the different political views in the parliment, start to give instead of taking. We need justice, well, make the police, the juristical system, the business contract, the personal contract in to something that is of real value.
Do as you preach in your own life.
The problems in the current construct of the European Union is simple; the politicians do not listen to the needs of the people. When the politicians fight to keep the system working and grasp for even more power, they forget who they are working for; the people.
It seems to me, that the politicians have created their own world very far from the street. A world where no real needs are met. Only the needs of the lobbyist seem to have any consequence in the halls in Brussels.
This do not work. A government have only one purpose; to serve the needs of the population. The people is not there for the politicians, the politicians are there for the people.
Now, the feedback systems from the peoples of Europa and back to the government are not working. The centralized government do not understand how it is to be a common citizen in Sweden or Ireland. They can see as far as the cafe in front of the parliament.
Now, there is a solution to the problems that the European Union is in the midst of. It is a very painful but healthy solution. The solution is for the politicians to get out of their ivory tower and meet the normal citizens. Listen to what they really need, try to meet their needs, go on leave for half a year to work in a run down community.
This will teach the ministers, the highofficials, the imposant empire builders their real task; to serve the people.
To find a solution to problem of the modern world, one can search in history for inspiration. The system we have today, what we call democracy is a system with deep roots. It goes all the way back to Mesopotamia and famed cities as Eden (Eridu) and Babylon. The theory behind the triangulation of power between a king (the president) aristocracy (the upper house) and the people (the lower house) is developed in the time of the semitic kingdoms we still preserve as a memory in the bible.
Most of the problems we have now is a direct consequence of the system we have. So the solutions people found to the same problems they had, when they invented the system, might still be valid.
Let us have a look at the system and the faults. The faults are simple; corruption, lack of loyality, lack of tradition, no respect for law, no respect for freedom of speech. This creates chaos, and a chaos where you cannot understand your neighbour, do not wish to work with him, and often live an isolated life.
This is painful for the individual, the lonelyness of the single career person in the megacities of modern times, is heartbreaking.
In the ancient times, when democracy was invented, they had the same problems in a city called Babylon. Babylon was a modern city, a gigantic city, famed for its massiv size, and its advanced system of government. They invented democracy.
Now, judaism, and subsequently christianity and islam is founded in Babylon by a man called Abraham. Abraham lived in the megacity of the ancient Mesapotamia, and just as we have today, Babylon was plunged into individualism and corruption. Its symbol is the tower of Babylon. A tower where nobody understands anybody. The Babylonians just kept building on that tower until it reached the sky, and plunged into the abyss.
As we are now.
Read more…
When Karl Marx initaited his amazing but frayed attempt to reconcile the different classes of the world into one, he forgot about a single, very important factor of human life; greed. Or, rather, he knew that greed is a motivator of people, so he thought that the abolishment of the right to own anything would stop the greed of the world. He was mistaken, the greed is still here, and it has morphed into a war of classes so devasting it is ripping the western world apart.
The netto result of the socialist experiment, today called socialdemocratic ideology, has not been a classless society as Marx dreamed about, it has been a society where the middle class tyrannizes the other two classes; the lower class and the upper class. The middle class is so strong that it has won all the central positions within media, bureaucracy and most of politics. The war is conducted through economical means and censureship.
The middle class tries to extract the highest amount of money to distribute, not to the poor people, but to themselves, thereby creating a corrupt “upperclass”, preying on the traditional upperclass. If the middle class had shown respect and veneration for the needs of the upperclass, we could have had equality, but propelled by greed, the middle class has sought to extract as much money from the rich as possible. The hippocracy is here the obvious discrepansy between argument and action. The argument for the middle class to take the money and the honour from the upperclass, has been the argument of equality, obviously the direct opposite has been the result. The middle class tyrannizes the upperclass with all the greed Marx tried to work out of mankind.
Read more…
The day has come where the Libyan people have to choose a new future. So many years have passed in the evil clutches of Gadhaffi, in tyranny, in oppression, in chains. These chains will very soon be broken and a new dawn will emerge in the near east, ready to sweep away all the conflicts, all the trouble, all the inertia of having a society bereft with corruption. We from West, the democratic league, applaud this development, and we congratulate you with all our hearts. We have watched you strive to win your own freedom, and we have respected the fight you had on you own, in order to win your own country. You did that and we are so immensly happy, that words cannot describe our feeling. We cry with you, we dance with you, we salute your new won freedom.
But after the freedom has been won, you will have very little time to confirm and establish your democracy. Napoleon had only hundred days at his disposal, you may have even less. Count fifty days from the day Gadhaffi falls.
Anyway, there are two basic principles and a triade of organisation you have to consider. First the principles of a democratic state; justice and freedom. Justice lies in the institution of law, freedom lies in the institution of the popular assembly.
What are these two principles?
Read more…
Today Ghadaffi blasted Denmark. Ghadaffi scorned Denmark for the critical stance towards Islam, and islamism. Let it be heard, without any doubt, with no regret, with the full heart of a noble nation; we stand by our critisism. Yes, the foul deeds done in the islamic world, the torture, the tyranny, the corruption, the rape of citizens, the evil that overflows the banks of these systems, are of no real humanistic value, we despise them, we do not like them, we fight them with all our heart, with all of our dwindling might, with all our soul, because it is a system unfit for the common man, it is a system of fascism.
Now what do we have to offer instead? We have the system of democracy, this beautiful, advanced, just and social system. Yes there is of lot of corruption in it today, yes we did foul things in the past, in the torture of Latin America, in the evil ways in China, Africa and India. We did wrong, we have admitted it, and we have payed our debts in the honour of our women, in the tears of our children, as they were raped by the criminal immigrants. We have payed our debts, and it is time for us to realize the inherent beauty of our system. Because the problem with our ways have not been the system itself, but the betrayal of the principles that lie at basis of our valuable and fine system called democracy.
What we have to offer is the freedom of that system, the freedom that lies at the basis of the principles. We are offering this freedom to the people of the Middle East. We have thrived with this system for many hundred years, not until recently did we part from the principles of democracy; freedom of speech, the rule by law, transperency, solidarity. And the fight we are figthing in Libya is not only a fight to free the people of Libya, but also a fight to cleanse ourselves from the corruption that is within our own systems of belief. It is both an inner and an outer fight.
This is what we have to offer, this is the terms we are trying to meet ourselves; the freedom of the peoples. Not only the american people or the danish people, but all the peoples of the world. The little man, the mighty queen, the beautiful baby, are all members of a nation grounded in the will of the people. We are all equal in the eyes of the state, and we can all seek justice within that system of belief.
Will the libyans choose the danish system, or will they choose Ghadaffi? I stand with Denmark. I am the only fighter left in fray here in Denmark, but yet still standing. I stand tall, and I support the libyans, the iranians, the bahranians, the syrians, the saudis, the egytians, the morrocans, the yemenite, the jordanian, the palestinian, all people who want simply to be free.
The world turns at its hinges once again, old allies are deftly reverting from friend to foe. We see the final chapter of European colonialism unfolding in front of our very eyes. European civilization, once the leader of the world, projected and unfurled from the blasting ovens of England, from the chambers of royal Spain, from the inner core of the French republic. Is now falling, falling apart in neglect, in lack of faith, in corruption by the leaders of our realms. The effect is a vast changing of the political structure of the world. The muslims are trying to regenerate as they put most of their hopes into a political version of their faith, emblazoned and put forth by that juggler of fortunes called Ahmadinejad. The Chinese are competing with unsound methods, by stealing technology and reproducing the ideas of the west in an unrespecting manner.
The Europeans are bound on hand and feet by a corrupt and elusive elite, trying to control the masses by illegal means.
Read more…
The coming conflict between life and death, creativity and stillness is approaching with immense steps, unrecognized by the citizen of normal nation, but recognized by the elite of intellectuals leading the fight here and there around the globe.
Let me be clear about my basic view of things. My entire work, focus and drive has, from the beginning been to prove the existence of G-d. This may sound prepostorous, and let me be honest, I do not know whether this project will be fulfilled or not, but I know that I have come some way down the lane.
In this fight I have detoured many ways, and have been a very active player in the way of things. Among other things I have defined is the fight between democracy and Islam. But this is just, I am sorry to say, minor intellectual feats. It is pretty obvious if you read about Islam and know your Plato, Aristotle, and history in general. The true test, however, lies in the ability to turn the western world away from its selfdestruction. This selfdestruction is mainly caused by a superficiality in faith. The lack of faith in spirituality drives us into the arms of materialism. It is all sex, drugs and rock’n roll.
Now, there is nothing wrong with our nature, if we understand the shadow. The cruelty of nature. The cruelty of nature is just there, and it is an unwise, greedy child that has to be understood and cared for within limits. If we scorn our nature, we will loose the connection to the very basis of our existence.
Read more…
To be able to define G-d is a matter og faith, some say, I say not. To define G-d is a theoretical nigthmare and an intellectual Marathon that only the most devout disciple of the temples of Heliopolis are able to fulfill. I think I have come to a crossroads, this flight is heaped with transgressions, misleadings, a fight against the curtain that is put between us and the roots of our civilisation.
The formula is simple. We know of two basic ideas that make up the theory of G-d; intelligence and creation. We believe that G-d is all intelligence in the cosmos, and we believe that this intelligence is the prerequisite of creation. Creation is done by using intelligence. Now how can we prove this point. Well, as C.G. Jung explains, based on a thorough study of hermetism and alchemy, we have to disperce of the idea, that the brain is the container of intelligence, because there are many animals who have intelligence but no brain. Where does the intelligence come from; simple, it is G-d. Where else could anything as immaterial come from. Or you could say, that the intelligence is what we call G-d.
Read more…
I believe that the future is pregnant with alterations of immense proportion. We will change the face of the earth, for better or worse. The sprout of redemption is planted in the fertile soil of the current world events. The decks are prepared, the bets are placed, and the winner will be the ruler of mankind.
In this game of immense powermongering titans, the life of a normal citizens of faraway countries is blown out in a blink of eye, not herded but forgotten as of now.
This Armageddon, this ragnararok that has been prophesized so many years ago, is about to start.
All the premises of war are there. The generals are sitting in a powderkeg smoking cigars, and the world will soon erupt in an all engaging war with the Russians and the Iranians on one side, the Anglo-saxons, hopefully the Danes, and the Jews on the other side. This will be concluded in the swampy powder-constructs called atomic bombs. The bombs are all there, the Iranians have them almost, so do the Jews, the Anglo-Saxon and the Russians.
Read more…
We slowly descend into an abyss of hatred, corruption and despair. Our ancient institutions of civilization are dismantled in front of our very eyes. Dismantled by an elite of evil and idiocracy.
We live on the brink of chaos, and we are the willing cattle herded to the slaughter. Yet, there are small glimpses of hope, tiny, flickering lights of illumination. These lights are haunted by the corrupt, and are, as of now so weak, that a gust of wind can blow them out. Yet they continue their beautiful course, undisturbed by the neglect and the evil of the chosen few, on that awfull construct, called our current legislation and rule.
Lets put a few of those principles that has lead to chaos, under the scrutiny of light. First of all, the basic problem of our western world is the detoriation of our institutions. Untill now, the institutions of the west have primarialy been upheld by the nationstate. This is a tradition that is founded in Mesopotamia around seven thousand years ago, and have primarialy been conveyed to the west through Hellas and Rome.
Read more…
Some reflections made by Polybius on Treason
Hence it is difficult to define those upon whom we can properly lay the name of traitor. Perhaps the situation which comes nearest to it is one in which men at a time of public danger, for reasons either of personal safety or profit, or because of differences with the opposing party put their city into the hands of the enemy, or who by admitting a garrison or calling in foreign assistance to further their personal aims and bring their countries under foreign power. All who commit actions of this kind may fairly be regarded as traitors. And yet, as everybody agrees, the treachery practised by such men has never brought them any real profit or advantage – in fact precisely the opposite – so much that we ask with amazement what their original motives can have been, or what calculations can have possibly have impelled them to rush into such a fatal situation.
Read more…

In a breath the vast armies of Hannibal occupies the motherland of the romans. Audacious, competent, intelligent and unimaginably succesful does Hannibal defend the colours of the phoenecians. An ancient semitic tribe of the middle east. Today alive in some pockets of neglect. But once an imposing, enthralling and advanced culture. Can we learn a little from the breakdown of that imposing civilisation? Do we face a situation similar to the phoenicians?First of all. The phoenicans were very advanced, but they were not really warlike. And when the threat of Rome emerged in the north, they had no idea what to do. The beginning of the punic wars showed this in all simplicity. The romans simply walked over the phoenicians, shattering their identity to the core. The phoenicians did not know how to use an army, and they lost.The Romans, at the other hand, were very well organized, and first of all, they were uncorrupt. That gave the disciplin to raise armies and to organize the war continually.
Read more…
The Egyptians had a very funny way of seeing spirit as something present but yet impossible to see. The explanation is natural, physical and yet spiritual. They held in their ideology that everything is made of energy. Some energy vibrates at a very slow rythm, other energy vibrates at a very fast rythm. Some energy vibrates so fast that human beings cannot see it.
This is more or less a description of how it is to be a philosopher i Denmark. Kierkegaard was very tired of it, Grundtvig really had problems with censorship. Grønbech just gave up.
This is how it is for me as well. Let me give you an example. These days an iranian philosopher Mr. Darius Shayegan is the guest of a university in Århus. We are advesaries, he has supported the Iranian Islamic republic, i support the danish democracy. As we both should. He bases his ideas on the spiritual ideas of the islamic tradition, namely the tradition of sufism. I respect that, sufism is parrallel to gnosticism in the christian areas and kabbalism in the jewish faith. It is platonic in the sense that Plato represents the tradition that were in Hellas in his time. Traditions based on mesopotamic and egyptian theory.
Now the so called “philosopher” Stjernfelt, who is really just a theoretician in language, with no interest in metaphysics, natural science, politics or cosmology, critizise the iranian philosopher because he is a sufi. This angle is a disgrace to danish academia, it shows us off as ignorants. There is nothing wrong with sufism, as long as it respects the boundaries of the secular state. What is wrong is the elements of sharia and chaliphate (sunni-Saud’i arabia). And on the iranian side the combination of islamic priesthood and democracy (shia-Iran). Because these systems are competitors to the danish model of a secular state with no religion as a base of the law and the democratic process.
And the list goes on. The socalled “chief advocate” Machanga does not know anyhing about the basis of law, namely justice. The christian debater Lilleør does not know anything about christianity, when the discussion about the poor girls who are mutilated by primitive muslim parents and uncles started, she defended the uncles!. The editor of the liberal online newspaper 180 grader Ole Birk Olesen, thinks that I am crazy. Meanwhile Birk Olesen argues for the absurd idea that only uncivilized persons critisize Islam. He is one of the most uncivilized editors in the history of danish media!
My conclusion can be only one. It is the stupidity, the ignorance of the socalled danish intellectuals that is the problem. They do not know anything, they have no moral integrity, they are uncivilized. Because of this the democratic debate is hindered.
Some say that ignorance is bliss. Well it might be so for the ignorant, but for the ones who actually have knowledge, it is a horror.
The corruption of society takes enoumous leaps, so fast now, it is hard to follow these leaps into destruction. Yesterday I looked at some of the pictures taken from Haiti. The pictures somehow burned themselves on my retinas, and in the night i woke up in alarm. The pictures of Haiti are pictures of a state in total disarray, a state in the clutches of the junglelaw.
It has been cooking for a long time. The tragedy of the poor haitians is not a tragedy that has only come with the earthquake, but a tragedy that has been piled up for so long. In Africa, before the colonization, beautiful civilisations where present. They had it all figured concerning gender. It was a beautiful place with ethics and virtues to strife for. The legacy of this world before colonialization is still there to grasp the mind of the africans. But in Haiti, where most of the inhabitants are from Africa none of this ancient legacy is kept in memory. No ideals are there, and everything just becomes what the animal in man dictates; the rule of the strong. Mobrule.
The pictures are horrific; murder, plundering, and all the worst in mankinds repetoire of evil is present. The law is abolished, and the rule of the strong is reimplemented. We feel safe behind our computerscreens. Somehow the suffering of a far away people takes a little of the pressure off our shoulders. Someone are worse off than we, we think.
Well, perhaps the abyss that the haitians are falling into is a prelude to what we will encounter if we are not sharp on the challenges that we are confronted with.
What we see in Haiti is chaos. The end cycle of democracy is also chaos. Exactly the same menagerie could be ours in Denmark if we are not very careful. Because chaos is what we will taste if law breaks down in our lands as well. It is not because we have not ohad warnings; shootings, rapings, theft, hedonism. All signs of corruption in society.
Read more…
According to Plato and the hellenic historian Thycudides, the backside of that beautiful coin called democracy is corruption. This weakness of democracy was well known in the ancient Hellas. Democracy was the main organizational method of most of the hellenic city states. There was off cause Sparta that had a more aristocratic way of doing things. But even Sparta had a council and the citizens used to vote on things as well, in the mass, the central, communal gathering they made every day.
Because this recognition of democracy having a weak side, most democracies and their inhabitants were very observant about the problem, and their intellectuals tried to find ways of controlling the situation. Platos political ideas were made in a time where democracy fell to corruption. And much of his political work could be seen as a experimenting and search for the perfect society in absolute balance between freedom and moral.
His point was that the quality of democracy is freedom and the quality of aristocracy is ethics or moral. Therefor one has to combine these two organizational methods into one unit. Sparta was, in a way, such an ideal society. They had kings, and they a form of democracy.
Today we encounter the weak side of democracy on an international level. The systems we installed after the french revolution democracy + the rule of law, has reached its final developmental cycle; chaos. This is obvious in The US, Great Britain, France, Denmark, and to some extent in Germany. The corruption of democracy has been formalized on an federal level, so that it somehow merges into a enormous juggernaut of destruction. The European Union is such a condensation of corruption. Most of the decitions made by the EU is against the will of the people, and it bears all the stigmatas of a democracy in a violent, spinning decay. One of the main parameters of a failing democracy is the lack seriousness attached to the citizenship. The citizenship is the very core of the state. Each citizen abides to the laws and the decitions of the rulers of democray. This gives a certain cohesion and a mutual playing ground. If this core institution is weakened the law is weakened as a result. This is quite obvious in all of the west. The citizenship is weakened to an extreme. In Denmark the state protects foreign citizens much more than citizens of the state. In the example of the attack on the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, the state cannot send the foreigner home to his original state. Why? Because he has international rights. And the state is not aware of the extreme importance connected to the citizenship and the function of it. To be a citizen is an honour, and the state should protect its citizens.
Read more…
To be healthy both body and soul should be in prime condition. The body is kept healthy through exercise good eating habits and dance. The soul is kept healthy through interaction with other healthy souls, and through a connection to the inner part of God or Osiris that is part of man. In hermetic and gnostic litterature one defines three stages of personality. The material (the body) the soul and the spirit.
These ideas are very old, and has its echo in intellectuals as Jung, Herder, Grundtvig, Plato and many other thinkers.
In relation to the rape of the poor young girls, how do the person react to that? Well young girls are fragile beings, like flowers on the very first stage of blossoming. In a way the beauty of such a young person is in its virginity something of a miracle. Evil men are attracted to the beauty of these young girls, and instead of praising and helping the girls finding their way in life. They hurt them, abuse, kill their connection to all that is beauty. Leaving them as crushed flowers in the site of the road. Run over by meaness and babarity.
They are like brutes in the garden of Eden.
One of my friends is a girl that was abused. Her story is heartbreakening. She is now mature, but her innercore is broken by the barbarians. She almost married, found a nice danish boyfriend, but when he heard about the former life of the girl, he split. She is transformed from a nice danish girl to something unclean. In this way, she carries a burden of guilt and brokenness she cannot tell her husband. Because it would ruin their relationsship.
Read more…
Making an interview on a blog poses some advantages and some disadvantages. The technical quality of the interveiw is often much worse than what you normally see in interviews in the television. That is the drawback, the good thing is however a much wider timeframe. In television you are very limited in your timeframe, you are only allowed specific amounts of minutes and seconds. Somehow modern tv has decided that time has to be speeded up, as though running faster will keep the audience.
Wrong, what keeps the attention of people is quality, and their interests.
But, these considerations however lead to a new way of looking at the interview in connection with the blogs. Time is unlimited, and people who read the blogs are mostly people who like to discuss, are interested in knowledge, and the competetition in this specific genre is almost nonexistent. Very few people make interviews on the internet.
All in all a dreamscenario for an interviewer.
The result is a much longer and deeper discussion, compared to interviews in television. The technical quality is worse, but the intellectual discussion is much better.
This combined with my Soctratic attitude to interviews, that truth is to be found in dialogue, creates somehow a new genre of interviews. The first interview with Mr. Lars Hedegaard created a lot of commotion, perhaps because the form in itself was so strange to the audience, that they simply underestimated the quality of the work, and thought it was the work of low quality.
It is up to you to decide, because the idea of quality is, to a large extent, a subjective feeling. There are off cause an extensive estetichal discussion that might follow the discussion of the form, but let it be. It is just interviews.
The wind blows, some trees fall, some remain erect in the storm, winding it off, clutching the earth with their roots, standing straight in the evil flow of darkness. The storm is over, and the tall trees of the forest are still standing, as they have remained erect, in all these years, blown by the foul breath of the left. These trees have deep roots, roots that goes all down to the very core of humanity; brazen they stand defending truth and ethics. The vile imposers to the throne, emerged in black garment of filth, bowing to the darkest strains in humanity, screaming foul words of insolence at the defenders of light and truth. They have no boundaries, love is not in their sight, only hate and murder do they thrive upon. Long hurls of demolition, burning things, defiling the name justice, this is the methods of the foul offspring of darkness.
Now the nights of light, so few, has gathered from all corners of politics, left right, the middle to combine in a small band of lightbringers. It is the elite, the most hardened and true. They are marxists, they are christians, they are jew, they are even muslims – and they still stand tall in the face of corruption so evenly spread out by the massedia. The midgets of injustice, screeching their foul words into cosmos.
It is a fight between light and darkness, between corruption and truth, between good and evil, between knowledge and impure faith. It is a fight between the stupidity of the international masses against the princes of light. Somehow the stupidity of the masses have conquered important strongholds of light. Or rather, together with the danish people the nights of light, are fighting the dark trends of multiculture within politics and media.
A new year is coming, perhaps a change will occur. Perphaps the dark clouds sorrounding the the sun will be forced a little back. We succeed in penetrating the clouds once in a while, this work might continue and eventually succeed.
In the lower recess of the mediteranean civilisation, behind layers of metaphysics and theory, the beautiful allegory of the Egyptian godess of Isis is at work. According to legend, Isis is the moon godess. She is the one that will guide the soul when it is trapped in the cloth of nature on earth. As Plato describes in the cave allegory, mankind is bound to the end of the wall of a cave, light cannot reach down there, because nature is a prison to the soul. And the sun is too strong a source of truth to mankind to stare into, therefor we look at the moon. It is light, but it is a light we can cope with. Isis; the queen of light. And Isis has a spouse or a son called Osiris. As God is too vibrant for us too see, as the sun, Osiris is the part of us that is God, in our souls that we can see. Osiris is the redeemer, the regenerator. Because only through truth can we truly cut the bands of darkness that surrounds us these days.
One mighty victory was won for the light, more is to come. And in the end, we might win the war against the deep insulary nature of man. The corruption that is strangeling us, brought to us by the harbingers of stupidity. The persons caught in nature without any spirit to help them.
They call Isis the virgin of cosmos. And it is said that she will always remain a virgin, because like the sea, the sea might be darkened by the filth of stupidity and ignorance, but the water remains pure. And it is through the cleansening of the water that we remain human, and drag ourselves away from the nature itself. Nature is beautiful. But if you as a human being are only in nature, and have no spiritual search and faithfulness to truth, you become nothing but an animal.
And that is what the knights of the light are fighting against; the animal, savage natural incarnation of man, brought to us by media and the very darkest sides of Islam in conjunction.
Let the nights of life and beauty be strengthened next year. Let the princes of light emerge as strong allies of truth, and let them save the world.
I think we are approaching either the demise of mankind, or a new spiritual awakening. It is quite simple; the ability to destroy ourselves has never been greater in the history of mankind. We are able to destroy ourselves numorous times with the weapons we have got. The naivety of the west has put the world in an extremely dangerous situation. Atomic weaponry should never have been allowed to states that are very willing to use them. But yet they are, and this puts the world on path to destruction. The west created the weapons of mass destruction, but someone else might use them for real.
We cannot continue finding the destroyers, there will be a time where a roguestate will fire off an atomic bomb. It could very well happen here in Copenhagen with all the fuss an all the conflicts between the east and the west centered in Denmark.
Man was given a responsability to nature. We say that man was made in the image of God. Why? Because man is the only living entity on earth who is given the gift and the curse of intelligence. With intelligence man can rise above nature, and carry out decisions based on thought. Since, according to the classical egyptians, God is nothing but thought, man is an intermediary between God and nature. We are the daimons, the mix of God and nature. We are the guardians of nature. The sheperds of the flowers and the forest, the dolphins and the ants. Because if we do not take the responsability of the intelligence we are given, we will destroy nature, and ourselves. This was the core of the climate meeting, we have to embrace the responsibilty we carry as daimons. But it is not about the Co2 really, it is about not killing each other.
We have, potentially, the gift of God. The gift that could make a universal society based on truth and responsability to things around us. If we abstain from killing and raping each other, we could, with the development within the realms of natural science create a world of abundance and joy. Nature could serve us, in a good way, but on its own conditions. We should carry the task of natural preservation and care, with all the burden of the will of the intelligence of God.
Now how do we reach this target? First of all, someone has to do something about the danish media. Denmark is the hub of the new spiritual enlightentment of the world. But the danish media is doing all it can to stop it. It even goes to the extent as to try to kill whoever opposes its hegemony, as it has tried with me twice. It is really the greatest problem of the world right now, and anyone who have the slightest responsability to the future of mankind should work out a solution to this problem. The whole world should really focus on the wrath of the danish media, fight it, enlighten it, whenever it tries to kill someone, blow the act out into all corners off the world media. Everbody should know about the hatred and the evil materialistic spirit of the danish media. It was shown amply in the last conflict I and Lars Hedegaard just had with the danish media, most of it tried to kill our message. This will not do if we are to reach a solution to the threat of mankind. Forget about Afghanistan, forget about climate change, forget about the conflict between Iran and Israel. The problem is here in Denmark, the danish media is trying to kill the solution to the problem of mankind, with all its might. Christians, muslims, jews, buddhist, agnostics, communists, anarchists, hindus, zoroastrians, bahai, all that cares for the world and the future of mankind, focus on the danish media, put pressure on it, buy it up, force it to stop trying to kill the philosophers of Denmark. It is a system of extreme corruption, of idiocy and no knowledge. It will do almost anything to try to stop any spiritual awakening, any attempt to stop mankind on its path to destruction. It is the future of all living things that is at stake, and the first barricade to scale is the danish media.
And remember, we do this to carry the torch of light and truth, that torch that is corrupted and put out by the evil materialistic nature of the danish media.
I am very happy to have caused all the commotion in connection to the interview I did with Mr. Lars Hedegaard, the chairman of The Free Speech Society. Once again the media have underestimated me. Perhaps there will be a time when they show a little more intelligence in the fight with me. So far the strategy has been to try to kill me, and then ignore me. But they will have to kill me for real if they are to get rid of me. Otherwise they just have to do what I say. And that is to respect their basic obligation; to search for the light and the truth. In fact be themselves, do what they are supposed to do, follow the example of Voltaire, Socrates, Kirkegaard. Or be the slaves of stupidity.
Well let me explain why I did the interview. First of all it was to shed some light on the dark sides of Islam. We all have faults, and Islam has a lot. The fault of the west is too much liberty, and the fault of the east is too much restrain. Liberty from oppression is something we are encountering in the west because the east has all its rules. This is off cause not tolerable, freedom of expression, freedom of will we should not loose. But when it comes to personal ethics, being a true person with respect for the persons around us, we have a problem in the west. The loyalty to the states are falling apart, the time when a word of man was unbreakable, is long gone. The corruption of the state is picking up its pace. This is the fault of the west. On the other hand, the fault of the east is the conservative strings attached to everything of real importance, and especially the strings attached to knowledge. Knowledge should not be a item of the state, God or the local priesthood. Knowledge is for everyone, and should be free to attain. Then there is the issue with the girls. Girls are not allowed much in the east, this should stop. Let the girls free, they are beautiful amazing creatures with their faults, but you cannot love a slave. You can only love a free person. If you keep girls as slaves you will not experience the truth of God, because God is not something you can meet in meditation, God you meet with other persons, in love.
Luckily the ignorance of the media is flaunted into the open. It is a bit funny to see all the selfrighteous mediapersons bask around in the limelight, with absolutely no clue about what they are talking about. It is ridicolous. But they should have listened to what I said; you are the guys saying that the emperor has clothes on, and I was right.
Anyway, before we start throwing stones and mud on each other, please everybody, focus on the issue instead of the messenger. It is about the girls, they are raped by evil men. If there is any justice in Islam, it would obviously recognise that rape within families are unjust. And the muslims in the world should be aware of the atrocities done to the danish girls by muslim men. There was a poor girl who were held in shed for a year, beaten, tortured by her muslim boyfriend. How can this but bring a bad name to Islam? Is this the way Islam wants to be represented in the West? If not, it should stop. It is a disgrace to Islam what is happening here in Denmark, and even worse in Sweden.
My father was a muslim from Bangladesh actually. The spirituality I witnessed there was beautiful, but I cannot recognice this beauty in the rape of my friends.
It is an ethical discussion, and right now Islam is low on points here in Denmark.
I will repeat my endeavours, I will fight this fight until I am no more. Because justice and light is not to be abandoned in the cowardice of the western media, and the evil of the western Islam. There will be light as long as I am here, with my companions to serve the truth.
It is not a blame game, it is at quest for beauty and truth. Because only through these principles can we really reach love.
One of the beauties of the internet is the fact, that it gives the philosopher an easy and almost free way to distribute his ideas. Under the french revolution the philosophers had to rely on books and newspapers, much more cumbersome and difficult than the internet.
In the current phase of state-corruption, the philosopher is supposed to be the guardian of society. By giving an understanding of the situation, and provide simple remedies, he or she should try to guide democracy away from the collapse and the subsequent chaos.
The information is there, all you have to do, as a philosopher, is to read “The State” by Plato and “Politics” by Aristotle.
It is actually, seen from an academic point of view, quite easy. The hard task is to distribute the ideas and inspire the politicians to change course from corruption to ethics.
The problem, in its first phase, is therefor solved, the second phase; massdistribution, is however still not an opportunity. People need to understand the problems and why the politicians act as they do. If the people do not know the arguments behind the actions of the politicians, they may be a little confused.
This is where the traditional massmedia is more of a problem to the soceity than a positive force. First the media tried to kill me, then they have ostrazised me, what will the next be? It is absurd, in this very critical phase of democracy, the media tries to kill the guardian of society. How is a state supposed to work, if the media tries to kills its philosophers?
The state needs to do something, the media has morphed into something very dangerous, a threat to society, because of its vile actions and lack of integrity.
Darwin is an interesting person, so influential and yet simple in his way of thinking. As I see it, the return of biological science based on an Aristotelean empirical method is still in its infancy. With all respect to the extensive work done on the major universities in the West. He is a figure of vast discussion in the realm of metaphysics, because he was seen as an imposer to the throne of God. There are extensive fights fought especially in the US over the legacy of Darwin.
I try to heal the wound between physics and metaphysics, and let me underline my basic faithfullness to darwinism, his ideas were right, but he had only grasped some of the principles of nature, not all. So the problem with darwinism is actually not the questionmark put to metaphysics, but the lack of understanding of nature. According to the darwinist Geoffrey Miller, there are actually two principles in work in nature; survival of the fittest and sexual attraction. This is absolutely right, and if you compare his ideas to Empedochles, one the greatest natural scientist of antiquity, they both agree. Empedochles calls it love and strife, Darwin calls it survival of the fittest and sexual selection.
But there is a great difference between Empedochles and Darwin and that is the fact, that Empedochles has a much broader scope of natural principles to present than Darwin; the principles of attraction between living things, the search for justice and so on. To this you have to add the fact that Empedochles was a very religious man, he understood spirituality as a part of nature.
Read more…
The West is broken into two; atomic science and metaphysics. The schisma goes deep, very deep. It goes all the way down to the very roots of western civilization. Two main roots is what we have; Mesopotamia and Egypt. In Mesopotamia natural science was born; biology, physics, astronomy, banking, writing and living in a city. The first city of Mesopotamia was called Eridu, or Eden in a biblical memory. It is still there, a lonely Ziggurat rising from earth, as a distant memory of past glories.
Egypt was the home of spirituality. One of the best sources to this amazingly beautiful culture is the Hermetica, a poem describing the truth of heaven and earth. It carries such beauty and elegance, that the modern world of corruption and Hip Hop reminds me of a tainted lake, difficult to bathe in, but nevertheless the bath I have to take everyday.
Today these traditions are, at one hand perfectioned in natural science; we fly to the moon, we make computers, we industrialize everything, everywhere. This credo is the cradle of civilization whereever the Anglo Saxons have put heir mark on the world; China, Japan, Australia, the US, South Korea, and so on. Industrialization have become a way of living, an empty sheath of mechanized marching. The paradox of it all in the former communist countries is the fact that communism is a copy of an egyptian tradition. Plato, who must have inspired Marx, copied his things from the Pythagoreans, a secret society with roots in Egypt. So the form of organization is originally created to preserve spirituality, but is today exactly the opposite, a spiritual mechanism aimed at materialism. I think this is one of the vices, and the ultimate downfall of the communists, you cannot worship money, it will give nothing but false living. This is one of the challenges of China, the quest for materialism is the quest for nothing. The virtues of family, trust, and spirituality is paramount.
Read more…
To understand the problems of the West, we have to dig deep, and see through the magnifying glasses of the scientists. Most people do not understand why things are falling apart, the ethics of the society is in decay, some grasp for answers in places of no real interest. But let us have a look on the basis of our society, and see if we can come up with some answers and some questions.
Our perception of the world here in the West is based upon Mesopotamic ideas. These ideas were conveyed into Hellas via philosophers as Animaxander, and again conveyed into modern life through the work of Lucretius, the Roman poet who based his view on nature on the famous Athenian philosopher Epicure.
Epicure saw the universe as a huge Lego playground. Everywhere there are atoms that combine into complex structures. This theory is today the basis of atomic physics; Niels Bohr, Einstein and so on. Seen from a moral and a spiritual point of view, this system leaves the world as a very boring place. In his own time Epicure was also held in a bit of disregard because his ideas made a world of boredom. In his famous “gardens” epicurans roamed, with only the purpose to satisfy their own needs. Not sexual needs, as we concluded with Freud, but the need of friendship and study. In the view of Epicuranism there is no life after death, only the dissolvation of the atoms each person is build of.
Read more…
The local election is over, some cry, some cheer. But all in all, it was a good thing for democracy to see how people and the powermongers take it serious and are uncorrupt in their handling of the system. The first winner is the democratic system itself, no fraud appeared. It was all conducted by local people who respected the groundrules of democracy. It is very cool, and beautiful.
As a see my role as a philosopher, I try to enlighten society, but through my knowledge of the basis of society I also try to inspire. Now, all political parties are heirs to philosophy in some way, both the danish, the foreign, the religious and the nonreligious. So we are all, in a way, the sons and daughters of Plato. Therefor it is not my task to critizise the parties that are loyal to the heritage of western civilization, now including some who are of an eastern civilization. But only my task to critizise when parties are not loyal to truth, justice and love. When corruption of the fabric of the world occurs. So this is my humble contribution to the different parties of Denmark, a little inspiration. I start form left and go right.
Enhedslisten
Communists are not so popular these days. Perhaps because communism is flawed as a thought construct. It does not work, whereever international socialism is implemented, it fails. This does not imply that it does not have qualities, it has, social justice, enlightentment are good qualities of the socialist system. There have been traitors of Denmark among the communists, and this the communist have to face to get on. Also, the alliance with radical islam is also tearing the communists apart. There are parallel qualities between the original sharia state and communism, but the fact that radical islam is so inspired by Hitler and fascism, should make it the enemy of the communist, not the ally. There are very interesting signs of development in Iran, the people of Iran wants to be free, have democracy. If the communists could combine their moral nature with the values of democracy, it could move on and find find a new path. This was the original idea of Plato, so why not, the leap is not so long.
Read more…
Racisms is a word and a concept that is often used in the current discussions within society, but what is it really? And what is the history behind the concept?
Let us try to trace it back to its origin and discuss the concept of today. The focus on race started with Darwin. In his very famous book Origin of the species, he discussed the development of nature. The thoughts of Darwin have been reflected through the times, in according to the ethics of the time. Darwin published his work in the time of Victoria, so sex and the more profane nature of things was overlooked. It is a petty, because his main work was actually not on the selection by habitat, but selection by sexuality, or if you will love.
The unbalanced focus on the negative trends of nature; selection by strength or strife, led to an emphasis on the waraspect of nature. This was put into a social theoretical frame, that ultimately led to the racial theories of the Third Reich. The theory was, that not only animal races compete over ressources, but also human races do the same. As a consequence of this idea, Hitler proclaimed that the aryan race was in war with the jewish race. The arabs really liked this idea, although they are very closely related to the jews. Both jews and arabs are semites. Read more…
When Mozart lived he had an opponent called Salieri. Mozart was the wonderkid, the genius who, with very little effort, produced the most spectacular and amazing pieces of classical music. Salieri was the mediocre composer who worked dilligently and hard, but all to no avail, the compositions he produced was just … boring. His intense jealousy towards Mozart is an example on the mediocres feelings towards the geniuses.
One of the problems with danish society today, is the fact that the Salieris have conquered the entire academic system, and through their dilligent and profound control, they ruin all beauty and development of society. Their insistence on the qualities of the multicultural society, their use of such fallacy as racism, islamophobia and other stupid ideas, puts up a veil in front of the basic ideas of a civilized state. Where is the insistence on truth and justice? Where is the stubborn defence of democracy and rule of law? The Salieris forgot it, and they are unable refind the focus on the basis of society.
Read more…
There is an ongoing war between the traditional media and the new media; the blogs. I initiated my career as a debater in the blogossphere, and most of my contacts are part of the blogossphere. This war is extremely decisive for the development of the society, so a discussion on the pro and cons of the new media is vital for the modern democracy.
Let us try to analyze, and see if we can find any qualities of the two, and perhaps some of the new interactive trends.
First of all; there is a tremendous gap of quality between the old and the new media. The discussion on blogs as Gates of Vienna, Uriasposten, and the content of Snaphanen, and Zonkas blog are way better that any of the old media. There are exceptions, the show Deadline in national television is quite good, and some of the content in the newspaper Jyllandsposten is also quite good.
So the blogs have given the avantgarde intellectuals a space to develop new ideas and distribute the ideas in a fast and free way. This is very good for the democracy, the more debate, the more reflection on a serious level, the better for the society. The backside of the new media is however a low level of massdistribution. There are many readers on the major blogs, but it is only people who are very interested in politics that read the blogs. People who are interested in clothing, shoes, parashuting, they watch television.
You may add, that there is a third media that is much more powerful than the new and the old media; rumors. The spread of knowledge through discussion in home and between friends. This type of communication is actually what really matters. The blogs in combination with rumorspreading, is actually the main communication on important issues today. An example; together with Anders Gravers of Stop Islamization of Denmark i devised an intellectual defense of Denmark, I put democracy and the rule of law in opposition to sharia. This paradigm is today a given fact whereever you go and discuss with people. I have talked with Steen from the blog Snaphanen.dk, and he has the same experience. You put something on your blog, and after a very short time the whole world reflects on it. It is extremely powerful.
Read more…
One might wonder; is there a life after death? The current philosophical dogma deriving, as I see it, from the Epicuran renaissance, says no. Epicuran doctrine holds the atomic build of the world as a base of philosophy. The tradition was conveyed through a roman philosopher/didactic called Lucretius. In the philosophy there is no God, religion is a bad thing, and personal needs is all there is to guide a soul.
In the natural sciences these basic principles of the atomic theory have been prooved to a very sophisticated level. Smaller and smaller parts of the atom is aknowledged. But is it true that all spirituality is of no relevance and untrue? Well, nobody knows, yet. There are plenty of room for discovery, the aetherical dimension described in the metaphysical litterature could be another dimension and therefor true. The connection between the realm of God and man, conveyed through the soul could be a connection to another dimension that we are only able to reach through inner contemplation. It is possible, and the atomic science is not a hinderance to this theory. There are other mysteries that are impossible to explain, like time. Perhaps time is not linear but cyclical, it could be, the theory is discussable.
Read more…
I die, you live, that is the basic law of nature. As a habitat is crowded with species that are competing over ressources and space, the fight becomes fiercer and more violent. This is the problem of the planet, the race of man competes over ressources and territory. Now who will win? The strongest will win. There is a lot of corruption and rot in the western world, especially in the ruling elite. Some elites are more rotten than other. Consequently some elites are weaker than other.
Empedocles claims, that fire has a twofold nature; Hades and Hephaestus. Hades is the God of destruction and death, nothing good comes from him. But Hephaestus is the lover of Aphrodite. Through the combination of love and strife nature evolves. So it is with the western world, some states develop in an amazing speed, some die. Denmark and Sweden are the focalpoints of this development. Hades rules in Sweden, Hephaestus rules in Denmark. Why, because the elite in Sweden is absoluty corrupt, moral wise and intellectually. In Denmark, the corrupt are having problems, as Seidenfaden, the corrupt editor of the newspaper Politiken is having right now. In Denmark the good laugh and the evil cry, in Sweden the good cry and the evil laugh.
Read more…

We are a generation with the opportunity to rebuild the country. Through the seventies, eighties, nineties, and the last nine years, nationalism has been a creed of a despicabel nature. At least this was the attitude of the elite; the media elite, the cultural elite and a great part of the political elite. Cosmopolitanism has been all the rage. Things are now changing, nationalism is more popular. After forty years loyalty to the country is in fashion again.
The thing is, there is a long way to go, to refind a positive image of Denmark, and what it is to be a dane. We are lucky because we have Grundtvig, the national poet and philosopher of Denmark. To refind his beautiful and amazing system of belief will be like a cleansening shower on a day of spring. The insanity of the current intellectual trends are like poison to the mind; jaded socialism, imbecile multuculturalism, economical/philosophical rule of law. No, we need to rebuild the nation on enlightentment of the soul, the soul of men and women, but also the soul of the people.
Now, there are traitors among us, let me explain. In the seventies, just before the Berlin wall fell, as a last desperate move into Europe, the Soviet Union put all their efforts into proselytizing and wooing the elite of the european countries. The secret service, the KGB, did their very best to infiltrate and move people to communism. We had the atomic free zone movement, probably controlled by the KGB. We had the red stocking movement, why?
Read more…
I have a really cool friend, he is from France and he is all about wine, the history of the different sorts of strange beverages of Tolouse and so on. He is into the different strategies of the french colonial powers, the history of France, and the current strategies of EU. EU is largely run by France, so a french perspective on the megelomanic, corrupt, undemocratic french system is enlightening.
One of the main competitions of today, is the competition between danish and french intellectualism. Denmark have a lot of followers, and France just control the core of the EU state. One of the good things about France is the respect for culture. Everything in France is culture, the way you eat, fight, do politics and talk. It is not about the money, it is about the cultural capital. This puts the philosophers in an elevated state, they are not, as in Denmark, treated as dangerous creatures to either kill, or at least ignore. Levi- Strauss the jewish french philosopher of a very high quality was respected in France as Glucksmann is today. Me, the danish jewish philosopher is NOT respected.
Read more…
Not only Denmark but the entire Western World is under siege. The strategy is that of a Trojan horse. A seemingly harmless body of something has stealthely been placed in the middle of the village. Slowly it has dawned upon us, that the helpless immigrants the left and the elite so valiantly defended, are not so helpless anyway. Now the menu is rape, lying, stealing, burning, ravaging, marauding. The Trojan horse is opening, spilling its foul content into our society.
Now, what to do? First of all we should realise our own mistakes and fix them as fast as possible. Our mistake has been to be irresponsible to the mechanism of the state. The state is based on loyalty of the citizens to the base of the state. The base of the state is democracy and rule of law.
The state has a very effective and intelligent tool to protect itself from foreigners who try to exploit the state. It is called the citizensship. Only people who are citizens can enjoy the ressources and the protection of the state. It is our backup as danes. The state is our communal ressources, we lift together. If, however, the state is corrupted by leaders who do not respect the distinction between citizens and foreigners, the citizens are unprotected. The danes are unprotected today, because the state do not distinguish between citizens and noncitizens. As a consequence of this, we have a civil system where employees, teachers, pupils are mixed together citizens and noncitizens alike. This leads to total breakdown of society where it happens. I have seen it where I live. Rapewaves, stealing, intimidation, tyranny.
Read more…