From when we first put our longboats into the sea, have we been traders. Traders of fur, traders of coin, traders of commerce. Time has honed this skill to an almost perfect method containing transactions through immensely advanced systems of computing, satellite controlled navigation and radio transferred pay. But it all started with that longboat with its dragonhead at the front to steer through waters of wrath to our star navigated destination. We are sailors first, clad in the eternal robe of industry and tradesmanship.

When did it actually reach a point where we did break some of our ancient lore of commerce? I think it was when we were industrialized. I am an avid fan of the greatest writer in English; Joseph Conrad. His tales and yarns are crafted and based on the knowledge of the old ways of sailing. In one of his works he tells a story about the change that led to where we are today, and the price we did pay.

It is about a man of sea. His whole life he had roamed the seven stormbruised seas of the world. His all movements were a testimony to the rolling and the skimming of the boats, he walked in a rapid fashion, suited to move on deck. Gliding and stepping as a dancer on a backlit stage of ballet.

Now, the sailor had to get ashore, and leave the proud vessel propelled by the wind of the earth, because he was forced. He went to the shed where they register the seamen when they leave their ships, leaving not a name, but a simple cross, because he had no skill in writing.

Read more…

When you win, a good sign that it is a just and serious victory, is the fact that it does not feel like you have beaten someone, or crushed someone. If you feel like you have had a serious contest with an able and intelligent adversary, someone you truly respect for his ideals and his fighting style, then it is a good victory. It is a victory that spells of collaboration and cooperation.

I congratulate you both. Barack for winning a reelection of his ideas, and Romney for the bold words of working together crossing the aisle to rebuild, to put away all the antagonistic feelings and start the healing process.

Mitt, if I may call you that. Listen, there is nothing wrong with your ideas, on the contrary, they are sound and the best what could happen to the Republicans. Conservatism is about the principles of faith. As a man of faith, you are in the best position to turn around the party and give them new inspiration, it is easy, just follow your own heart, and you have a path.

Joe Biden. According to my prophesy book, you are the next president after Barack. This does not include a sure winning, but it does point to your strengths. You have a good chance in the next election.

Finally Barack Obama. You know, from the outset of the journey we have made, from the first tactical decisions in the Libya war, over all the fighting in the election, every time I saw that burdened look in your eyes, I truly tried to give you all that love and hugging I could. We did win another victory. But, there are so many difficulties to overcome yet. If I avoid to be put on the cross here in Denmark, I will be at your side, for no money, for no profit in terms of honour and attention, just to save my home, your home and the bright dreams of our kids .

G-d bless America, and all who believe in love and spirit.

To understand the progression of the jewish state, we need to adress the institutions we need to erect to make the state whole again. An institution I believe we should reinitiate is the jewish oracles Umin and Thummin. A greater part of the prophesies we still believe in today was created by Umin and Thummin. You can see it, or rather hear it in the tone of voice of the prophesies. The apocalyptic ideas, the worldspanning quests cannot just derive from a small individual, or a prophet it must have come from an institution. That institution was in the center of the first temple.

Now, we do not know whether we are allowed to raise the third temple, but we do know, that in order to be as succesful as possible we need to gain ground. We have done so, not much, but enough to rest much more in peace than what we did already.

A significant move would be to have another or renewed prophetical institution in Israel.

I can help with this, if Israel allows me to do so, because I have figured out, more or less, what prophesy really is.

Let me explain.

G-d or spirit is a natural power, like gravity or electricity. It surrounds us, and penetrate all matter. When we come to be, we encapsulate a tiny fragment of that power, and introduce it into matter. It is intelligence we get. Because G-d is just that; intelligence that we float around in, and we can both reach in birth and through divination in life.
Read more…

To really understand the corruption of the Danish state these days, one has to see how the mechanisms work. We have had a bit of a revelation of the corrupt system when the PET or local STASI actually held a small islamistfest on the 11/9. Because one thing is the participation of the secret police another thing is the endorsement of the politicians.

The fest was actually programmed like this:

The minister of integration, a socialdemocrat would, along with the secret police and the local integration mayor host the meeting. That is, at the outset it was planned as a highlevel show, not only of the police, but also of the political administration. The insult was therefore not intended just by the police, but, with the attendance of the highest office of Denmark, a minister, as a fullblown official statement, supporting the Iranian Mullahs, the Pakistani islamists and the local islamist franchise. It was a show of allegiance.

Add to this the persecution of most critical voices critizising the allegiance between islamists and the government. That is not just public debate, but the use of secret police, courts and other means to silence the critizisers of Islam, we have a semi islamist state on our hands.

Read more…

Going through the last few weeks of combat, there is one thing you have to focus one; speaking. All the other items of fencing can be left to other of your good staff. You just have to hit the trail and speak. Every convention will land you extremely vital voters for the election, this is the closest election in years, each and every vote counts. And you can swing them by talking to them directly. Give them some of that soaring rhetorics, you can do it, it is the final moment, hit the trail!

G-d bless you.

It is extremely difficult to do any serious work in terms of cultural development here in Denmark. The main problem is, without any doubt the creeping Islamization of the cultural sphere. It is as though, if you have some kind of muslim name, you are on the gravy train. I know it from my own experience. My original name was Asger Hussain-Engberg from my father. My sister still have the same name. When we worked together in the theater business some years ago, she had a huge success, not because she was better than me, actually most of the work she made her success upon, was my work. But because of her name. I had the obvious lack of luck, because I have had the audacity to criticise the islamic/socialist alliance. And being a Zionist on top of that, made me a direct enemy of the state, more or less. These jewish names are difficult the common idea seemed to be,while as the muslim names were all cool, and was a key to open all the coffers in the cultural administration.

Add to this the success of some of my other friends. They had a cool little jazz ensemble. Good musicians, no success. Then they changed their name to Ibrahim Electric Ta da! All of a sudden instant success. So why? Well it is quite obvious that the muslim name was cooool and jaaaaz. Not jazz in the original southern state american form, which I really like, no in a new muslim version. Not that I have heard that muslims like jazz much, in fact music is forbidden in the more conservative version of Islam. But in the multicultural/socialist view, Islam is the new jazzzz… or something like that.

Read more…

It was an amazing debate, the arguments were sharpened, the messages clear, it is, to my mind, obvious that, whoever wins the election; America is back on track. The challenges are met in a progressive and sound manner. The enemies are pressed back, and the political opponents are challenged in a balanced way. This coming from the brink of disaster after the Bush administration, is a bit of a wonder, you could say. It is like a huge aircraft carrier turning on a tiny plate, at the brink of the abyss. It was very good, I applaud thee, you have done so very well. Congratulations.

Continuing the work will be hopefully my friend Barack Obama, but if Romney wins, I am sure, he will make a competent leader as well.

I have held back a bit in the election, because my advice could be used against you Barack, so I decided to hold my horses a bit, because you knew what to do anyway. However, so close to the finishing line, you can use my advice without being afraid of your opponent misusing it.

Here are two pieces of advice. First of all; communication. Communication is about the right words to use. You can use carefully crafted words as a kind of game changer or definer of the debate. Like the word “Romnesia”. In fact, it is a bit unethical to use the dosing of words too much, but nevertheless I would advice using the word; “flip – flopper”.

Read more…

To win you have to lose yourself completely, and just focus on the moment. It is vital, that you think about only one thing; winning. I wish you the best of luck.

G-d bless you.

When focusing on the next issue of the tv debates, you must realize, that you are in the best possible strategical situation. All the cards are on your hand. Play it with eloquence, intelligence and drive. There are several gaffes to point to; the tour of England, the animosity of Russia and the possible explosion of anti Americanism in the entire Middle East if Romney becomes the next president.

On your hand we have already several impressive scores. I believe the most important discussion will be on the ideological content of the wars in the Middle East. Americans need a sense of pride and positive attention. This is what you can give them by underlining the positive and good development we have created in the Middle East. Tell them that you fought for democracy on your term, and you believe that the world has become a better place to live in, and a more secure place. You know that everything is not perfect, and there are much to do. But there is a lot of American spirit in the world.

Tell them that you wanted to give people change, and you have. Not as much internally as you would have wanted, because of the gridlock in the process of government, but you proved yourself as commander of the American army as liberator and a proud standard-bearer.

Add to this the improved standing in the world of America. And you believe that all Americans can be proud of being just that; the liberators and the good guys.

Tell them, that you will continue to serve as the protector of the American people, and the fighter for freedom.

Read more…

When we look upon the northern kingdoms, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, England, Holland they all have one thing in common; a falling socialist environment.

After the fall of the Iron curtain, new states emerged. They all had a difficult past with communist state systems of megalith coordination and control. The system worked as a state controlled, mind warping tentacle. That through media, controlled most of the so called democratic states. According to Vaclav Havel, the fall of the communist system were when the reality people experienced in the street were too far from what the state sponsored media presented to them. They started to read between the lines and decipher the real meaning.

The secret service had a humongous library of almost all citizens of the state, forcing new critical voices into silence through hard-handed measures. The same as Iran today.

The northern kingdoms are the same, just a lighter version. The state sponsored media is tightly controlled, and dissidence is monitored and persecuted and held under scrutiny. The light version of the socialist state, because that is what it is, is the fact that they do not directly kill dissidents, but persecute them through the many tentacles of the state. When you get a new job, they will contact the employer, when they want to disrupt your life, they infiltrate your family and friends to slowly wear you down. I have tried it, some of my friends have tried it.

The signs of a beginning of the end is the fact that people do not trust the media anymore. The reality is too far from the media conveyed reality. When the public television makes an islamfest, and sings about the beauty of the islamic faith, it rings discordantly when your best friend have either been harassed or maybe killed by a muslim. The reality and the media are two distinctly different pictures.

Now, to understand how to make a system change from corrupt Islamist infested socialism to true democracy, we need to make use of some of the same means as we did when we fought down communism.

These were propaganda, economical pressure, infiltration, and direct invention if a system are at the brink of collapse.

Read more…

When we consider the possibilities of defending the West, we also have to consider the acts of treason.

Let me put it this way. If you send soldiers to fight for the freedom of the Libyan people, or the Afghan people, you do not send them back to have their own kids raped by the very same people they are fighting abroad. This is intolerable, and I know that I speak on the behalf of all military personnel in their complete disregard of this policy.

Let me give an example. The same time we were fighting in Libya, there was a huge discussion in Denmark concerning a mega mosque sponsored directly by the Iranian regime in Denmark. There is still some discussion on the exact sponsoring, but according to my sources within the iranian expat community, it was sponsored by the mullahs.

This megamosque is planned, along with an entire medina collection of cultural institutions and schools in the center on Copenhagen. Untill this day, the entire political establishment has, unofficially, condoned the project.

What signal does this send to the mullahs? It is a clear signal of allegiance, add to this the open antisemitism of the leading artist of Denmark, the most outspoken is actually one of my family, the renowned international director star Lars von Trier.

You have a clear case of allegiance, bordering direct subordination.
Read more…

Confronting what we see as Islamists or terrorists, we need to be honest about the possible conflicts we will have in Europe. I have tried to convince the states and the relevant authorities. All to no avail.

The fear and the lack of progression is without any parallel in the European history. Somehow the Islamists have succeeded in infiltrating and pacifying the states so thoroughly, that it is not moving.

We should be honest to ourselves, it cannot go on. How would a confrontation between the West and the local Islamists on the European peninsula possibly progress?

To understand that, we need to understand the internal logistics, the political alliances, and the type of warfare we have to conduct.

First of all, it will be a city, guerrilla war. Most of the Islamists are fortified in the major cities around Europe; Cologne, Copenhagen, London, Paris, Marseille.

They have, swiftly, through local terror swept the territory clean of enemies, and build a lot of infrastructure in terms of schools, training facilities, communication and penetrated the local authorities.

When the confrontation initiates, we therefore have pretty little use of impressive cold war hardware. We need, motorized, flexible, well-equipped infantry to haunt the Islamists down, and put them to justice.

The progress we have made in robotics is very good indeed. The robotics of UAV and smaller fighting units are effective in a guerrilla citywar. Combined with a boosted secret service, the war will be a game of spies, counterspies and targeted hits. We need to hit the bad guys with precision and force. They are deeply infiltrated in supposed friendly territory, but we need to realize, that the supposed friends are not really friends. Only when it serves their purpose.

So to use the cloak and daggers effectively, we need to be prepared for a lengthened dance of the dark elites.

Read more…

As we commence the next generation of flight from outer space to earth, we must also focus on the advancement of humankind on earth. This is as difficult as entering and leaving space, perhaps even more difficult, because man is such a wondrous and complicated being.

First of all, we have made some progress, by looking back. We have now realized, that in order to advance the economy of the West, to the betterment of not only the West but beyond, we must produce the goods ourselves. Production is moving back. There are many discussion on the taxation and cost of this and that. But bottom line, the advantage of a home produced item far outweighs the disadvantage. First of all, the production is much more stable, secondly it contributes to the welfare of the Nation, a frame we all have to contribute to, the best we can. If we need and want peace and prosperity, someone has to protect us. Since neither the EU or the common globalist movement, including many local sponsors seem to either want or are able to protect us, we need to support the framework that will; the nation and its loyal supporters. We do that, as businessmen through a loyal support of the country we live in. If a factory is placed in England, it will strengthen England, if it is placed in Wales, it will strengthen Wales.

Nations are all the rave again in the world. In the Arab world it seems to me, that we have a burgeoning renaissance. It touches my heart when arabs talk about the true sources of their misery; the lack of civilization. The philosophers who roamed the great Arab states are all gone now, almost forgotten. But in order to relive and reinvent the civilization that was so advanced, Arab states must advance themselves on their own premises. It should be done with the help of Israel, since Israel is honour bound to progress other nations, Israel cannot defy the Arab states if they wish to progress. It has to be initiated now, before the oil wealth runs dry.

First of all, it is about the understanding of mathematics. You see, the West initiated its progress basically through a single individual. A simple man coming from a minor provincial town of England, his name was Newton. This man, single-handed started the industrial revolution. How did he do that? By focusing 100% on mathematics. He showed the English public, that mathematics will give them a sure path to truth. It gave the West a way back into the depths of Egyptian lore, since mathematics is an Egyptian idea.

Read more…

To be realistic about the fight against the islamists, we have to be honest with ourselves as to where they are, and the alliances they have.

First of all, they are pushed back over many fronts, the major win we have had in Sudan is the crown of our effort to push them back, but they are not beaten yet.

One enemy we have lost sight of is the money men behind the islamist surge. Saudi arabia have pushed some economical means as to their continued existence, Iran some. But the major contributor to the continued effort to bring down America and the West at large is not the relatively poor and corrupt islamist countries (perhaps Saudi Arabia is not wholly an islamist country), but the financiers of Europe, and especially Scandinavia.

Scandinavia is, wholly and with the heart the suppliers of Al Qaeda and numerous islamist regimes in the world. It goes through a clandestine effort of the secret service to cover up the fundraising and moneymaking in Scandinavia by the local islamists, to the open support of the islamists by leading intellectuals and literati. The most decrepit and sinister actions of the state is the employance of hard-core islamists to teach our young about the virtues of islam, and the faults within the West in connection with the criticism of their holy prophet. Yes, this is the action of the state, a shame, especially after the gains Denmark had internationally in the aftermath of the Mohammad Cartoon crisis. A good example is the journalist who, on the Daily Politiken, supported vigorously the 9 / 11 arrangement, a certain Jacob Sheik, has been the educator of our young, at 400 arrangements in the high school. Sponsored by the state, in state schools. Can it be more corrupt?

Read more…

We are slowly moving ahead in the competition between nations. According to Abraham in the Thora, we are supposed to be the “light upon the nations”. What would that include in terms of meaning. There are two distinct meanings we could include in the idea. First, “light” is an Egyptian idea that, basically includes the notion of truth. So if we are to be the light upon the nations, we should be true to our values, and true to other nations values. The second implication is the notion, that we should be an example to follow. Understood in the sense, that we are casting a certain light, because the actions we do and the society that we create is so inspiring, that other nations will follow suit.

Already this is slowly initiated through the good companionship with both the Vatican state, United States of America, and the Russian state. We are the stewards of the holy land, and in this capacity, through honest and enlightened service, we put the holy land to the service of all who hold it truly dear.

Now, as democracy and nationhood expands in the world, we are entering a competition. When America polishes its feathers to lift off in another turn of dreaming, when the great Russian fighter will emerge itself in both love and light, when Persia will realize its potential as the steward of Zoroastrianism, we are in a deer and healthy competition. It is not an aggressive competition but an inward rebuilding of our own values and virtues.

This is the true meaning of “light upon the nations”, the true and serious search for the values of our faith, and the realization of it in actions. We have to do as we preach.

G-d bless Israel.

There are some alarming developments seen from an Israeli point of view, in Denmark these days. There is an election going on in the junior partner of the current socialist/communist government.

The election is basically a right wing/left wing competition within the party. Until now, the right wing of the party were leading the party. This had the effect that the critical stance against Israel was toned down. Not much, but enough to safe the face of the Nation, with a little helping hand of my own design. Basically I had to ridicule the party leader not to cause trouble between Israel and Denmark. Problem is, the party is in charge of the foreign minister post. The current chairman of the party is the foreign minister of Denmark.

Now, as the election of the new chairman progresses, the left wing candidate is the most succesful. Some of her ideas are absolutely ok, she fights for state to take care of elderly, poor and unemployed. The only problem is; the most powerful ministry they posses, is the foreign ministry. So they should, rightfully, be judged upon their foreign policy. And this is where we have a bit of a problem, seen from Israel. Because her stance on the israeli, palestinian conflict is made up in the late Arafat days. That is she is supporting the “palestinian people”, and she sees Israel as a more or less neo nazi occupier of the hapless palestinians. She obviously do not really now what is going on, but she pushes on regardless of the implications of the Israel/Danish relationship that would deteriorate as a consequence of her stance.

Read more…

Concerning the ongoing debacle with the Danish internal security system. There is just a basic point we need to make:

We need an explanation as to why the PET arranged a meeting at the 9/11, the day so many American, innocent citizens lost their lives in the blaze in New York.

We have proposed the simple action; stop the Islamist in Denmark, and stop collaborating with them. That is the request, and a fair one.

We have explained the consequence for a continued collaboration with the Islamists, and our appropriate actions.

As I touched upon in the last article, we need to refresh our approach to the internal security forces of the Northern European hemisphere. They are not working the right way.

Let us recapitulate. We have, in Libya, in Tunis and halfway in Egypt fought for arab democracy. We have had the opportunity to ignite a wonderful wave of freedom seeking societies, a feat none believed before we started. Likewise in Iran, we are on the brink of a system change, if we are diligent and extremely careful. We will bring peace to the Middle East and beyond.

But, there is a but. We are not protected in our own homelands. The internal security forces are using the goodwill the military creates to shelter the exact enemies we fight abroad. Creating a situation where we are extremely vulnerable in our homes. It has come to the extreme, where our own daughters are passed around as slaves in Islamist rings. This is not tolerable, not at all. Add to the rise of antisemitism, and the picture is a Gauguin mixed with Picasso on very bad day.

Now, we need to mend that. So far, the internal security forces have not responded to our criticism, and our means are too violent for them to really understand. Killing people is the craft of the warrior, but the craft is a forceful weapon to use on soft and meek citizens. We need another approach, but first we need to understand what motivates the traitors of the internal security forces. It is a mix of two:

1. Fear

2. Ideology

Why do the internal forces keep persecuting me and my friends? Because they are afraid. They got scared, a lot, under the Mohammad Cartoon crisis. Now, this is the intention of the Islamists. That is what terror really means. It means striking fear in the enemy, (us). Terror is a subjective feeling. If we really look at the true strength of the Islamists, it is not much. They have some half-baked street thugs they can scare the citizens with, and, potentially a nuclear bomb in Iran. But compared to the combined strength of the West, it is not much. Add to this the fabled and disgraceful cowardice of the Islamists. (They only fight when they are sure to win). They are not a force to be scared of. Take the example of the Mohammad film made in the US. If we simply ignore them, nothing happens. It is a psychological game, where they are, to be blunt; faking. In poker you would say that they are playing as though they have a full house on a very bad hand.

So the fear our cowardly security forces are reacting with, is just a fools game.

Read more…

We have a problem in Northern Europe. Let me be absolutely frank about it; there is a concentration of Islamist power in the northern region. It has come about through infiltration of the UN, forcing the UN to send so called “refugees” to Northern Europe, picking Islamists footsoldiers to send to asylum camps. Not all the refugees have been Islamist footsoldiers, but a great part of them have. This has created, together with a 1990 style import of Arafat Palestinians, an underground of Islamist controlled and active network in the Northern Europe.

Now, things have changed, the Arab spring has weakened the Islamists considerably and together with the spirited fight against the different Al Qaeda franchises, the Islamist are weaker than before. This has also created a democratic muslim network, primarily among Iranian expats, some of them my good friends.

Now, the EDL, SIAD and the other defense leagues are made up of patriotic citizens of the northern european countries, they are, in all respect, representatives of the military fighters. They are the persons who fight in Afghanistan who at home confront the same enemy  they fight abroad.

This movement, that is, mainly controlled and organized by serious patriots without a racist agenda, they have been vilified and persecuted by internal forces. Me myself, I have had my family torn to pieces, and cannot get a job both because of the public vilification, and, I suspect, a helping hand of the secret services, in Denmark called PET.

Read more…

We can discuss how Israel should contribute to the conflict with Iran. First of all, the problem is; it is a war. War is one of the most difficult things to handle in terms of ethics. There are several problems. If you just fight, you might win, but it can be meaningless without an ethical aim. Let me give you an example. When Goliath fought David. What would the ethical aim for Goliath be? I mean, David was a smallish and young boy with only a sling. It would not be an honourable victory, and he would be seen as a tyrant if he won. That would, potentially fall back on his army.

Now, David had a mission, and it was an ethical mission; he wanted to free his people. He did so, and therefore won a lot of honour, and his path towards kingship was initiated.

The same goes with Iran. If we conduct the war as Goliath, we would not win any honour, and as a consequence our standing in the world would diminish and it would, potentially, give us a lot of trouble.

We somehow need to envision an ethical aim with the conflict to survive as a nation.

Read more…

We are now witnessing an emerging democratic movement in Iran. It seems to me, that not only are the Iranians tired of the economic sanctions that has been put the land, but they are actively voting, with their feet, for democracy.

In the past few days, an initial uprising has been seen in the markets of Teheran, where the money exchangers roam. This is a combined desperation and democratic urge we see emerge.

Now, this has to be supported. I support it 100%, I really do believe, that the Iranians, if they have the opportunity to be free, they will take that opportunity.

We all wish to be free, if we can. Sometimes we strive so hard, that the police will come and take us. This happens all the time in Iran. If we are not there to help them, when they cry for freedom, what are we as persons and fighters for democracy? We are not faithful to our values. So, be it Israel, and the US, and Russia, I hope we all will support the will of the Iranian people.

We will see, there is a fierce contest between the two presidential competitors these days in America. I have a close relationship to Mr. Barack Obama. But I know, that whoever will be the head of America, they will support the freedom of the Iranians. It would be a dire sin not to.

Read more…

We are talking a lot about red lines these days. Problem is, we need to qualify the idea a bit to really understand the discussion as such.

I fact in the book “Courage, wisdom and justice” you can see in the right column, I discussed the principle with Mr. Herbert Pundik the former editor of the daily Politiken and a veteran peacemaker. According to his idea, in politics you always have to listen to the “red line” of a opponents discussion. If you do not understand where his red line is, he will go to war and start attacking you. On the other hand, it is also very important to be clear about your own red line, so that the opponent will know when you are ready to fight physically with your opponent.

This is why Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu is talking so much about red lines, he is trying to convey the feeling of “this is the limit we are willing to go to”, and the message is clear, Israel will not accept a nuclear armed Iran, because it is too dangerous for Israel.

Read more…

When it comes to the defense of free speech, there can be absolutely no discussion; it is not to be suppressed in any way possible. It is the first principle of democracy, and there is no way to control a curbing of it in any rational way. Either we have it, or we do not have it.

The reason why freedom of speech is such a central principle is manifold.

Let me take you a bit down in history to celebrate some of the turning points.

The very first invention of anything close to freedom of speech was by the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten. He is the true founder of all monotheistic religions, that is Judaism, Christianity and Islam. In his view, the sun would be an impersonation of the spiritual realm, and the rays would be its way to reach humanity; hence illumination. Now this illumination on earth is the truth. Speak the truth he said, because in this you would be close to heaven. How can we be on a path of truth, if we cannot speak freely?

Fast forward to Greece, here there is first the renowned philosopher Parmenides from Elea. In his philosophy you could walk on the path of opinion or on the path of truth. How can we walk the path of truth if we cannot speak freely?

The most important philosopher however, when it comes to democracy is Socrates. Socrates was a genius in the Hellenic world, he personally changed the entire stream of philosophy without writing down a single word. He said; I am the wisest man in all Greece, because I know I do not know anything. His philosophy is basically one single point; there is one place where we can find truth, and that is in dialogue. This was refined by first Plato and thereafter Aristotle, who gave us what we know as moderne science, through the first french renaissance. Socrates died  because he believed in freedom of speech.

These are the most important of our ancestors who gave us the central point of principle when it comes to democracy. But there are others as Voltaire who was the example of the second french renaissance, or Poul Henningsen here in Denmark. Who fought, with their life at stake, for freedom of speech. Lately we have had a bit of a confrontation between some Islamists and Denmark concerning freedom of speech. Everybody else, or most, have backed down on the principle, except your most beloved or hated philosopher Asger.

Read more…

We are soon entering a vital phase of the election; the debates. These debates are crucial, because here the contestants are facing each other in a fierce battle on words and ideas. We need to be prepared, very prepared.

I cannot contribute with all the details we have to be in control of, but I can support with some basic reflection, on the some of the issues, I have had the honour to work with.

In a debate, as in any other contest, it is all about initiative. Who has the ball. So, from the beginning we need to be hard pressing on the issues we know are weaknesses. First and foremost, the main disadvantage of Romney is foreign policy. He has fumbled in this field, overwhelmingly. His nice, but unmartial stance on the issues are not really working. Yes, he supports Israel, but really, can you see the soft and loving grandfather be a Ronald Reagan or George Bush? No, he seems to meek to me. He would not have the true balls to take on that fight.

Now, he has also no idea about the current state of diplomatic equilibration. He has no clue about the standing we are in when it comes to Russia or Iran.

He knows a little about Israel, and a little about China that is it.

He does not understand, that what we are facing, if we fight along cold war lines, is turning the cold war into a hot war. That would be absurd, but that would be the reality. So, we need to ask him what he thinks will really happen if he attacked Iran full force? How would he imagine the power calibration of the Middle East would react to it. The most possible reaction would be an inflaming of the entire Middle East, and that would, potentially spread to the rest of the world, and a third world war would initiate.

Therefor, the most rational approach is a slow but mounting pressure, that might, might not result in a system change scenario. This has been the strategy until now, and it has paid off in a much more stable and less war-torn Middle East. Yes, there is Syria right now. But, the alternative could have been all out war.

The long goal is to make system change in Iran, for the sake of the Iranians, with the consent of Russia. This would effectively end the cold war, and it would, if everything goes well, introduce a much closer relationship to Russia.

Read more…

We are soon entering a direct confrontation with China, and now also Taiwan wants to play. In the confrontation between Japan, Taiwan and China with regards to the minute islands far from any of the three powers, it is all about the money. As I am informed, there is a lot of oil beneath the islands, so the three powers are fighting over it.

This leads to the open and very clear conclusion; we need to get our business, in terms of production, out of China. We can still trust the japanese, but China is not to be trusted. I think the aquisition of the halfmade aircraft carrier bought from Ukraine on the pretext, that it was supposed to be a casino, talks for itself. Especially since it is floating around, close to a possible enterance in the conflict with japan and Taiwan. We are facing a potential face off between the three powers. America will be hard pressed by Japan to enter into the conflict, but the strength of America is sucked up by China, so it is not a situation that is, in any way, sustainable in the long run. We need those factories back to Ohio.

Read more…

In regards to the Iranian threat to Israel, that continues as a possibility we cannot ignore. I have the following ideas and thought as to how we can prepare a peaceful solution to the threat. Maybe not absolutely peaceful, after all, war is a dangerous endeavour, but a solution with the least amount of violence involved.

Let me begin with a story. My grandfather’s brother was an amazing person of his time. Imagine a man of the last century; strong, upright, just and warm at the same time. One of the persons you would wish you had as a grandfather.

He was an enlightened schoolbuilder. His life’s work was a Højskole in a place called Snogerup. a grand theater of learning and wisdom. A place for the young to attend to attain not barren and reproduced knowledge, no, a place for real wisdom.

Being a leading intellectual and a staunch supporter of the liberal cause, he went on a mission to the Faroe Islands. Imagine that place. It is called the most well-preserved island community in the world; avast with monumental cliffs and thunderous waves beating at the shore in an endless battle between sea and the puny refuge of an old tribe.

Denmark has had the stewardship over the Faroe Islands for a thousand years, all the way back to the viking ages. So it is an ancient relationship between the Islands and the mainland. Often there has been a bit of a tendency to break free of the proud islanders.

So my grandfather’s brother wanted to mend the rift that was between the islanders of Faroe and the people of Denmark, and he went on a mission.

He set up camp in the most conservative of conservative camp of the Faroese, and he had a message. He said; I represent the spirit of the people of Denmark, we realize, that it has not always been perfect, and for this we are sorry. We do respect the wishes of the Faroese, and we wish to make peace.

Read more…

When talking about conservatism, it seems to me that Romney at the meeting in may, was a strange carricature of a conservative. Mind you, I should know, being a conservative philosopher myself.

What is it really to be a conservative? Well, these days many conservatives tend to look at the ideas of Adam Smith and his free enterprise ideas. During the Bush administration it was put to its extreme, and it is not wrong to say, that it has run its course as an idea we can use, as Keynesianism, on the other side.

We need to remake the idea of conservatism, and although conservatism can be many things, there is however one thing it is for certain; it is the ideological fight for justice.

Justice has always been at the center of anyone who would want to support country, faith and the wellbeing of man.

How could we then put these basic ideas into a new use? Well we would first have to discuss what justice really is. Justice is an ancient idea, that was first defined in Babylon and in Egypt. The Babylonian idea is more what one would understand as a conservative version, since it goes hand in hand with the aristocratic ideas later put forth by the orders of the knights.

It is simple. According to Hammurabi, the Babylonian king who invented this first step of civilization, we have law to protect the weak against the strong. In an uncivilized world, it is the strong that will rule the weak, so to control that, we put up rules, to protect the farmer, the child, the normal citizen against the strong criminal.

Seen in an international view, it is the same that goes into the fight against tyranny. Here again it is the strong tyrant that will subdue the weak citizen, and through at helping hand, and ultimately the government of democracy, constructed over the rule of law, is the redemption of the weak of the states of the tyrant.

Read more…

Talking about “Islamists” all the time, one could like to discuss what an Islamist really is, and whence the idea, or det definition came from. It might sound preposterous, by I really believe I coined it. It was in the aftermath of the Mohammad Cartoon crisis, that i joined SIAD. Stop Islamization of Denmark. At the time it was basically an unknown smallish group in northern Jutland. So I did not know it, and basically nobody else knew it. But on it goes, I joined forces with Anders Gravers, and we envisioned a new strategy to stop the Islamization.

I did much of the strategic work, and Anders was the chairman; the head of the organization.

My idea was basically pretty simple. After reading most of what I could get my hands on of literature defining and discussion Islam (most of it critical). I realized, that Islam is a system very much like our own, just structured in a totally different way that ours. But the basic building blocks were the same; they had a rule of law, at state, and a religion connected to that. They call it sharia, Ummah, but it is the same, it is the nation and the rule of law.

Now, to make a critical stance towards Islam, I however needed to understand where the precise conflicts were, and where not. I realized, that there is no real conflict between our religion and the religious parts of Islam. Both Islam, Christianity and Judaism has, as a religious goal to support the nation.

So the conflict was in the political sphere. We are democrats, or rather, most of the West, and now also the East are believers in the Socratic ideals of free speech, humanism and the rule of the people. Add to this items as enlightenment and justice, and you had the Western/Eastern political project.

So in order to define ourselves in opposition to Islam, we are the democrats opposed to a religious state.

In Islam justice is found in the Koran and, ideally, as a divine definition, in our system it is done by the elected politicians, ideally as the will of the people.

Therefor, I proposed Anders, that we see ourselves as defenders of our democratic states in opposition to muslims who do not respect the democratically founded items of state. That is the rule of law and the rule of the people over the law.

We stressed, that we define the opposition of our project as politically driven muslims. We defined secular muslims, that is muslims who believe in democracy, as absolutely ok, and muslims who believe in sharia and the ummah as the antagonists of the Western Democracies.

This ideology spread through SIAD to numerous political parties, and through Danish Peoples party to the rest of the Danish society, and from there the rest of the world.

That is the story, and the power of philosophy.

Read more…

In the conflict with the Islamist controlled Iran, we are en deep waters. They have finally used one of the big guns; coordinated attack on embassies over the entire Middle East. They did it with the Mohammed Cartoons, and they are trying to do the same with a new film.

Here are some of the pieces of experience we made in Denmark in the same situation:

1. It is all theater. It is not about winning any territory, or really because they are angry because of so-called “insult to their prophet”. It is a political happening. In Denmark they even imbued the happening with extra pictures that were really insulting to Muslims. If they were genuinely offended, why would they then make up extra pictures of the prophet really offending.

2. Negotiation does not work. The happening is a happening. It was like when the flower powers planted flowers in the guns of the soldiers. They did it to make a political statement, it was not about obtaining anything. They just wanted the attention.

3. The campaigners are not really that many. Since it is a political happening, it is mostly organized by political insiders. So it will be the faithful, not the people as such.

4. Being scared does not make any difference. They are in it for the scaremongering, so just stand firm, take it with calm, and deal out the necessary, just, actions.

Now these political (violent) protest are not there for just the entertainment of muslims, christians and jews alike. They are there to serve a political aim. This aim is a bit difficult to understand. But understanding the mind of the leading Iranian Islamists, it does not have to serve a direct aim, it is just a happening of chaos. Remember, the leading supporters of Ahmadinejad are chaos worshippers, they are the SS of the iranian system. They are basically as wacko as the SS was with strange ideas with occult meaning.

Read more…

We wonder from whence the ideas of freedom came to the descendants of the northern people. It is old. In the old times, before we were christianised, we had freestates and freethinkers. So it is traditions that is as old as we are.

Now, there are many who threaten freedom all the time; Islamists, corrupt socialist governments, bureaucracies run mad. It all comes down to the same problem; tyranny. They like to rule and control other people, especially people they somehow dislike, be it the men of the West, the jews or the men of the East.

Sometimes they like to try our freedom, to see if we are still awake, or the corruption has got us chewed up. We were awake when the islamic hordes were here the first time, that was a time of Holger the Dane. According to myth, there will be a time where he is awakened, when Denmark is in mortal danger. He will rise as foe of old times, and start his songs of fighting.

My feeling is, that he is not totally awake but there are glimpses here and glimpses there. When he is totally awake, the foes of the descendants of Denmark will not be happy, but will meet a adversary of an imaginable force.

Let us remember that this day when we send our thoughts to the hapless civilians who lost their innocent lives in the flames of the dying twin towers. That day pushed us to remember a thing or two about freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of conscience and freedom of a man to follow his own destiny uncontrolled by tyrannical state.

These are some of the values we have fought for, Denmark and America in unison for years, let the years be many more.

G-d bless the forgotten, the persons in pain and families who lost so much on the 9/11.

Understanding the current crisis of the West should be the starting point for a medication. You have to know why the West is in its predicament before you can prescribe medication.

The reason why we are in a crisis is because we are corrupt. We do not anymore serve the basic principles of the nation. We tend to go our own way and look for ourselves instead of joining hands and work together for a solution. Listen, the current crisis will not be dealt with if we continue to think that we can just take another sleep in the hammock. It will only work if we stay loyal to the principles of our nation. We need that common goal to pull things together and work for the reenergizing of the nation.

Read more…

Long ago, almost before the memory of man, we had an enlightenment, the halls of Hammurabi, the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, the walls impenetrable made by the minds of the greatest philosophers. It was prescribed, that one day, all of these ideas would reemerge, and the nations would shine again. This process is now, we have seen it in glimpses by Mr. Barack Obama, we have heard it whispered by Mr. Netanyahu. Let it be heard, that never again will the light of the nations be dimmed.

Now, g-d blessed, these ideas are reemerging. They were there all the time, it just took the internet and a theoretical nerd to dig them up. It could have been me, or someone else. But the advent of the internet gave everybody with the time and the skill to look for the principles of the nation the possibility and the ability to do it.

It is an ironic thing, that just as the West seem to have lost the light of the nation, we see it reappear. We see it shining once again. As Mr. Biden said, it is now or never, we are on a hinge, do we wish to die as a civilization or do we wish to reemerge again.

They have a word for it in France, when they dug up the principles of the Nations a few hundred years ago, they call it renaissance. The rebirth of the nation. They sung it, they fought for it, they died for it. A simple idea, worth giving your life for. Why? Because it will give your children and your best friends, and your family a chance to live a better life. It is a well proven, fact checked robust system that just work.

Read more…

To really change things, we need to understand how change works. I have studied it for some time, to really get a deeper understanding of the issue. Here are some of my conclusions.

According to Aristotle, there are in fact three modes of change: Alteration, change and growth.

Alteration is when everything changes at the same time, what you would also call a revolution. As when Cuba changed from some kind of democracy to communism. The entire system changed. Also in nature we have these sudden changes as in spring where a barren place suddenly becomes full of life. Alteration is the fast change.

Change is when some kind of theme or thing changes its principles. Aristotle gives an example. He tells about a bronze shield that changes from being round to being square. The thing itself; the shield is still bronze, and it might even work as a shield to some extent, but the principle of roundness has disappeared and become square. The amount of bronze is still the same, so no growth has happened.

The last principle of change is growth. Growth is what happens, when the mass or quantity of a thing increases. The opposite movement; corruption or decrease, is what happens when the quantity decreases. Growth does not move a thing, but the thing stays at one point, and expands its boundaries relative to its growth.

Now, these are all good principles, and being Aristotelian, they carry some weight. But how may we use these principles to really create prosperity in our nations?

Read more…

If Iran needs to change it would meet a welcoming hand of the West, and off cause of Israel. Let us be honest with the islamic republic. In reality it is a bit like the Nazis take over of Germany. They seized the moment. In a situation of chaos and distress, they were the strongest opponent to the turmoil, and the people turned to them.

What they got however, was not what they had hoped for. They hoped for a more free and human society, they got a terrible control fixed system. Where everything is in order, to the most minute detail.

The backside of the Islamist society is a secret service no less formidable than the most effective SS sponsored project. The SS wore black leather coats, like the angels destruction, emblazoned with the skull of death on their caps. The secret service of Iran are mechanators of destruction, well-trained, purposeful and dedicated to the system.

Now, that has been a living hell for the most Iranians. Iranians are proud people, rightfully so. A culture descending from Zoroaster, Cyrus. Iranians invented the idea of good, and major parts of christianity are actually Zoroastrian traditions, conveyed through Mithraism into early christianity. Christian supper is a Zoroastrian tradition.

So, to the intellectually enlightened, there are many bonds that bind the West to the Persians, and the iranian traditions should be respected.

Read more…

We are witnessing a major shift in the power struggle of the international world these days; the waning presidency of Mr. Barack Obama, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, the advent of chinese powermingling, and the rise of Mr. Mitt Romney.

First of all, the latest international political development has been without my consent, and honestly, to be frank, these moves are counterproductive to not the US, but to Russia.

Russians are always worried about double-acting and hidden agendas. Look, if it is true that there is a deal between Putin and Barack Obama concerning the foes of the fertile crescent, the Russians are really at the loosing end. Let me explain. If the western powers enter Syria and conquers together with the Arab allies, well who is to lose? Russia will, most probably lose its Tartus base. An extremely important base to Russia. This is the reason why the russian generals are against the move. That is a long-term loss. The stance of America will change if Mitt ascends to the presidential honours. It will start supporting Israel again, and the power play will tilt back to the traditional Western approach. If Syria has fallen to the West at that point, the West would have both Syria and Israels back. Russia would lose its regional role in the Middle East, and the West would be the only serious player. I am not saying this to turn against the West, but to be fair the Russians.

But winning the Syrian war could turn out to be a Damocles sword to the West as well. Winning a victory and turning Syria into another Sharia/Islamist governed country like Egypt would be just another folly. So, everything is extremely murky, and nobody really gains anything from entering the Syrian conflict. Off cause, the humanitarian consequences are too high to ignore it, but the only real political gain would be if Syria ended up a stable democracy, and that would, at least, imply a serious democratic development in the Arab states, chosen by the Arabs themselves.

Well, there are signs in the Arab world, that some intellectuals are realizing the potential of a true Arab renaissance. The Arab world are still in the dark ages. The development attained in the West is not implemented by the Arabs. It is a stale world, without any gain in terms of political development. In fact, it is a little ironic the West connected to the greek and classical Egyptian and Mesopotamian sources through Arab sources in the reconquest of Andalusia.

The Arabs are welcome, anytime, my email and telephone number is accessable, just call, I will be happy to let the Arabs in to the secrets of the Nation. After all, Islam is also a descendant of the covenant Abraham made with spirit. Remember the idea of the monotheistic religions are as a support of the Nation. I am 100% jew, but I would be happy to help the Arabs to regain democracy.

Read more…

One of the main principles we have to discuss is justice. As Abraham was promised we would be an example of justice. So, what is justice really? I have touched upon the subject before, and the thing is; there are many definitions of justice, all the great philosophers of the classic greek age had one, and we are also bound to understand at least Babylon and Egypt to understand a justice definition worthy of Israel.

Now, there are two basic principles we have to take into consideration; the Babylonian and the Egyptian. I have done extensive studies in the field of ancient justice philosophy, and I think there is, at least two profound realizations to be done. Firstly there is the lawstone of Hammurabi. On this it says that the law was made to protect the weak against the strong. Now how may we interpret that. Basically, I believe that Babylonian intellectuals must have had the same realization of justice in nature as the Greeks. After all, the Greeks were highly inspired by both Phoenicia and knew the cities in the fertile crescent quite well.

The greek realization was according to Empedochles and Plato, that in nature, the weak succumb to the strong. We can see it in uncivilized areas without law, here it is the rule of the strong. Often gangs of different kind. We see it in South America in the Favelas, we see it in Europe in the ghettos (immigrant ghettos). Read more…

The covenant we made with lord, was made thousands of years ago in another age, in another mindsetting. We are entering war. As Obama is deploying warriors to the Syrian civil strife, the conflict with the Iranian/Syrian/Russian (chinese) faction is stepped up.

In this rising conflict, we need to understand and remind ourselves of the covenant we made with spirit, or rather Abraham made with spirit. What was it, that we were promised, and what were the deal on our side. It is quite clear, if you understand the covenant on the mindset of the Babylonian age Abraham lived in. He is promised to be the father of all nations. If, at the other hand, he works for the absolution of the idea of a nation.

Now, what is a nation? To understand this, we need to understand the ideas that roamed in the fertile crescent at the first stage of human civilisation. A nation is, as we know from both antique semitic/egyptian sources and the antique greek sources, what we, today know as democracy. The core of democracy is human rights and that is the rule of law. Added to this is a complex system of layers of power; the king, the aristocracy and the people. Now, as in Babylon, the democratic ideal has its failures; it creates moral and ethical disintegration. This is why Abraham had a task to do; to stop the moral failing of the nations. To spread love and kindness, but also righteousness and justice.

So religion is an integrated part of the nation-state.

Read more…

To understand the implications of the current occurrences of the world, one has to understand nature. Why are we at war with most of the muslim world, and other parts of the world? Is it because we are racist, or they rectify old colonialist scores? On a superficial level, there is some truth to that argument. We are responsible for some of the worst atrocities in modern history. Just remember the red indian and the slaughter of their habitat and society. Or the south american persecution of the Aztecs and the Maya.

But on a deeper level, the conflicts we see today is something completely different. Let me give you an example. On the easter Island, there was once a magnificent culture. It left us awe-inspiring monuments as the giant statues buried on tons of rubble. What happened to that impressive culture? It was destroyed partly from external influence, and partly from overpopulation. After many years of steady improvement, suddenly there was not enough space. The arable lands were too few to produce enough food for the people living on the islands. What happened? War. The tribes of the islands started fighting over the arable land and the possibility to harvest from land and see. This was a war of territory. The ideological content of the war was very diverse and impressive in its idea, but beneath the warcrys and the intellectual ideas, was the simple fact, that it was all about survival. They were too many.

Now when the West populated the American continent, it was, basically the same. There were a surplus of inhabitants in Europe, and the power of the Europeans to make conquest, and we conquered America.

So what are the basic principles of this development? It is the rule of strong. The stronger part of a warring tribe will conquer the weaker part. Now, strength comes both in terms of material wealth and possibilities, and it comes in terms of intellectual strength. A rich culture can be weak in terms of intellect. This is exactly the problem of the West right now, or was untill before the Mohammad cartoons. The Mohammed cartoons, brought an initial awakening to the West. We started to arm ourselves in terms of principle and ideological prowess.

Read more…

Being a Dane, I have a special relationship to the English. It goes back thousands of years.

I will tell you English a little story, or perhaps a few stories. The first time I really had a deeper understanding of England it was because I read the story of the founder of my philosophical line; Grundtvig. He was very interested in an English story, and he persuaded the King to send him to Cambridge to study that little story there. Remember this was around two hundred years ago, so the reality was a little different at that time.

Grundtvig enrolled in the ancient and amazing institution of England, where Newton has roamed among others. And he started studying the little story. He met a certain English lady, who taught him about freedom in the Anglo-Saxon version, and he studied on.

The story he was interested in was the story; Beowulf. I got hold of the story, and started to read it. And it dawned upon me why Grundtvig was so interested in the story. Because it started with the exclamation, it said; We the Westdanes. Grundtvig was a historic philosopher, searching for the roots of Denmark; the mythological and folkish roots. So he was interested in the English story, because it was a part of Danish story as well. The thing is, in the time of Beowulf, the English were Danes, we were the same people. That is why most of our traditions and the feeling between Denmark and England is so similar. We are not a colony, or a part of the central european mess, we are sailors and warriors like you.

Now, that is why I tried, very hard, to help you guys. It is not a superficial or political project. It is the calling from thousands of years back, when we were one that spurred me.

Read more…

To do business, one has to be cunning, industrial, but also honest and straight. It is funny, often businessmen are portrayed as evil and deceptive, especially in Denmark where the socialists hold sway over vast parts of the public service and media.

But, to my experience it is often the other way around. The conservative businessmen, that is, the old and established owners of business, they are much more interested in how people fare in the local community than in China.

Now there are however the new businessmen, they are often prone to flash their wealth buying expensive clothes and jewellery. But common for all; they have to run a business. How do they actually do that? Well, they do it to their best knowledge, and, often to the traditions that are brought to them through many years of experience. Take the shipping business here in Denmark, it has its traditions, and they go all the way back to the time we were vikings.

But, we need to understand what a business really is. I stumbled upon a gem og wisdom when I read an ancient scroll of philosophy. This scroll relates the story of a certain philosopher called Bion. Bion was a Platonist, and a contemporary of Plato. He was a philosopher like Socrates; lively, intelligent and provocative. He did not write any books, but some citations are preserved in the writings of Diogenes Laertius.

Bion says, that wealth is the sinew of business.

How do we interpret that? First of all, a sinew is a part of an individual living being. In a body you have the head, and you have the sinew. The sinew is the part of the body, that will work as a motor of the body. It is the propulsion. The part that will move the body from a to b.

Read more…

What Russia will contribute to the earth with in the forthcoming years, Russia will have to decide for herself. It is with great awe we look upon the amazing country so vast and strong. We, as danes, are some of the original source of some of the Russian culture, men and legacy. We still remember the great cities in Ukraine, these cities were settlements of Danes and Swedes.

This gives us a sense of shared identity. Off cause, with all the things that has happened after the cities of Ukraine fell to the Tartars, Russian society has changed, and is not the same as the Danish. Due to its size, Russia is also stronger and much more imperial.

I am worried about the war. War is coming, it is in the air, and I am worried about the outcome of the war.

Read more…

To really understand the debt crisis, one has to understand the background of the crisis. There are several principles at work here. The most basic is the corruption of democracy. According to Plato (and many other contemporary philosophers) the backside of the shining coin of democracy is corruption. There are several methods to stop the corruption, the most important is off cause enlightenment, that is the enforced transparency of the society.

But there are other institutions to hinder the corruption of society; the law, the faith, the family.

Now fast forward to economics, what we have in the current system is an unbalanced system. On one hand we have free market theories based upon Adams Smiths “The wealth of nations”, basically it states, that the freedom of trade will be a boon to all nations implied.

On the other hand we have Keynes, who believe that the investment in the state and state sponsored project will boost the economy, so that it will create jobs and so on.

Combining the insight of Plato with the current state of economic theory, what would the insightful reader notice? He would probably notice, that the one side is talking about freedom, the other side is talking about economical motivation. What is missing?

Read more…

To win, you need to enter a battle where you are strong. In the economical battlefield, you are not strong. This is due to many factors, mainly that a social democratic/Keynesian investment politics does not work in a globalized economy. Investment in infrastructure will not give you any permanent job creation, because the true production of goods are not done in the country, but outside the country. So the long-term objective of Keynesian economics; to boost production is not working anymore.

This is one of the reasons I proposed a Adam Smithian/ethical economic plan. Problem is just, that it is so new, that nobody knows about it yet. It still is the right remedy to the current crisis, but the intellectual spheres has to understand the ideas behind it to support it. Since I am virtually unknown in academic circles, no one have the insight into the principles of the policy, and keep on discussing Keynesian economics.

So, you need to open a new front. This is why i proposed the Civil rights front. What would that give you? First of all, it would give you a platform where you are the strong. Behind the economical discussion lies an identity discussion. Do americans identify with the basis; the constitution, the law, the principles of American democracy or do they identify with their race.

Read more…

Talking about the Iranian threat we are in a terrible situation. We are, basically caught up between the Sunni and the Shia competition in the fertile crescent. And we need to be extremely vigilant, not to make a wrong move.

Behind the competition between the Persians and the Arabs another, much more dangerous equilibration lies; the old cold war competition between the West and the East.

Really the competition is over, seen from an ideological perspective, but in real life, practical power stratification it is still very much in existence.

What we risk in pushing United States of America into a war with Iran is a third world war along the lines of cold war stratifications.

I do not say this to make a judgement on the strategy of Israel at this point, but to give a strategical explanation to some of the reluctance of the military establishment as to why they are a bit reluctant to engage in full war.

On the other hand, a nuclear armed Iran is not acceptable to anybody, not The US, not the Saudis, not Europe, and definitely not Israel.

This leaves us little room to maneuver.

Read more…

Listen, when the civil rights movement, with that courageous and honest priest called Martin Luther King did all he did to stop the racist division of America, started. It was not about what he did not like, but what he dreamed about. It was not a negative or divisive message, he tried to find something that would unite not divide. He found something; civil rights. What are civil rights; they are the rights we all, with no preferation to skin colour, social background or economic advantage, have as equals. I have the right to speak freely, I have the right to vote, I have the right to be protected by law, I have the right to judged objectively by the state. I have the right to go to school, and send my children into a safe world, where things progress, and they are happy. This the dream Martin Luther King had.

Now, what it really does is, that it gives the basis of a platform that we all share. We make a frame, we all support to create a safe haven for all. We make common ground.

Now that dream is not helped during your first tenure. It was basically forfeit from the beginning, because the “whites” are scared. They see a country they used to be proud of become weaker and weaker. And what they do is the opposite of what would actually help; they become more distrustful and racially motivated.

Now it is a two-way process. To be honest, there are plenty of racist bigots on both sides of aisle. But that does not make the project of Martin Luther King forfeit. This is not the time to lose faith, this is the time to fight. This is the defining moment. Let us be honest. We cannot win on the economic fortunes of the current system, it is not working. Some of it basically obstruction, some of it is international malaise. But it all comes down to winning the hearts and the minds of all.

Read more…

When you are persecuted, you have to run to keep alive; make new friends, skip the ones, who are actively trying to take your life in this and that respect. Be vigilant, and hard to the idiots and betrayers around you.

They always have an excuse. The most horrendous is the ones who actively try to take your livelihood and peace “for your own sake”. They think you are “misguided”, some do it because they believe you are “psychotic” or something else. Persecution has many names.

The media in the corrupt state is in now is trying to censure you as much as they can. I have had the honour to be censured in a semiautonomous blog/newspaper called “The Free”. Call that a bigotry act.

Now the right wingers persecute me because I am not 100% ethnically Danish. With my half jewish mother and muslim father, I am not to be trusted 100%. Good ol race bigotry, all white ass holes (sorry about the pronunciation). Not all off cause, but a sizeable part “do not trust me”, or believe I use “double standards”. In the Hedegaard case it all came into practical fruition with an all white (too many jews, unfortunately) supported the old white male, and backstabbed the young “racially mixed” person. Disgusting.

On the left the issues are different. There I am “too national”. Or, they do not like my patriotism. Come on, just because I am not 100% race white, I do like Denmark, I do like Israel, and I wholeheartedly believe in the idea of the nation. I did dig up all the basic ideas of the Nation, because, for me, it is not about race, it is about ideology.

Read more…

When we started the fight in Libya, we did it to set Libya free, and to strengthen the democratic development of the Middle East. Now, before we started that quest, the Middle East was all in defeat and under the rule of tyrants. We did start a movement, it halted to soon, and we should have continued it. But, be as it may, we did a lot of good.

Now, that is concrete and specific progress that we have done together; Europe and The United States in unison.

We stood behind you, we fought together, and we did some beautiful things in collaboration. Now, this is why Europe supports you. Now, you could say, that it does not matter, and the US could just focus on China and the possibilities there. But would the US be a better place for that on the long run? Would you not lose some of the ideas we create here in Europe and you can put to use in the great and free country? Take the insourcing idea, this was created here in Europe, and refined in the US. Is that not a good thing?

Well, having been beaten and prosecuted myself, haunted by the secret police, the media and my friends. I still believe, that having true friends matter. I still believe in the solidarity and love one shares with a good friend. And it is my experience, that true friends always try to support each. Yes there are crisis, but in the end we stand together.

Read more…

It is very important, that we fulfill a role as mediators and peacebringers of the world. Right now, there are two main powers of the world; Russia and The united States of America.

Both are vary of each other, and we stand, in all respects, right in the middle of the competition between the two. Well, both needs a friend that will accept them both, and try to mediate between them .

This role is, in some way a European role, and in some ways an Israelean role.

The problem is just, Israel is very new to the game, and, in some ways, I am sorry to say this, it is with the deepest respect of the legacy of all jews, but still, we need to play the international game of politics, a little more wisely.

When Bulgaria was hit by the latest antisemitic onslaught, it not only rocked the jewish world, but it also brought a few cracks into the vaguely initiating relationship between Russia and Israel. It is no secret, that Russia is behind Iran and Syria, and it is no secret that Russia was, indirectly responsible for the attack on the bus in Bulgaria. If it was an Iranian/Hezbollah attack, it is the proxy of Russia that is responsible. That is a very difficult situation for Russia to be in, add to this the success of the Obama administration in the Middle East theatre, and Russia is under a lot of pressure. Well, I have been one of the strategists behind the success of Obama, but, for me, it is very important not to lose the support of Russia. It is a partner of Europe, and a friend of Denmark.

Behind the problematic situation in Syria lies a competition between the Arabs and the Persians. And the arabs, being allied with me, has had a lot of success. But, this is not intended to wrap up the entire Middle East and give the Arabs opportunity to win and conquer, it was ment as a opportunity to make peace, and further the democratic and peaceful development in the Middle East.

Read more…

In my research to prove the existence of G-d, I have come to new eureka moment. It just struck me. After having read some really advanced and complicated hermetic philosophy for a while, I just realized what hermetic philosophy really is; it is the lore of the core of catholic faith. Why do the monks have vows of silence; to be able to hear the communication with G-d. Why do they keep all these ancient libraries under lock, because some of the lore of both Egypt and other sources of ancient wisdom, is still there to be procured, if the Vatican church chose.

Anyway, what is the problem of the church? It is a rising competition of what you would call Newtonian physics. Newton changed the game of the West in a profound way. Even though he was an alchemist and a magician, he really changed the way we look upon reality. How did he do that? By proving, beyond doubt, mathematically, his hypotheses. He had a knack of dominance in him. When people tried to discuss with him, he just wrote two or three pages more of mathematical proof. In this way he did succeed in proving gravity, even though gravity is a bit magical. But, the most basic contribution to the West, and now, more or less to the entire world, was his worldview. In this, you can prove things mathematically, actually the only serious prove is mathematics. Everything else is just superstition or knowledge not to be taken serious.

This leaves the hermetics in a bit of a weak situation, because most of hermetism is shrouded in secrecy, and very difficult to understand, and never really scrutinized by mathematics or dialectics.

Read more…

In The confrontation between you and Romney in regards of foreign policy, you have the best chance to beat him on your own terms. It is pretty obvious, that you have made a huge turn around. Before you came to power, the image of America was at its worst for decades. After the Soviet Union fell, America had a bit of a blossoming, but it faded again with Bush. Bush was an amazing guy in some ways, and he was a true dear friend of Denmark, he came here on his birthday once, that was a defining moment of Danish foreign policy. But he had his weaknesses, one of them was a bit of an insensitivity to other people around the world. In the Afghan war, in the Iraqi war very little was actually done to pay respect to the local citizens of the said countries, it was mostly gung ho, John Wayne military tactics. Do not get me wrong, I like Texas, in fact Denmark is, more or less, the Texas of Europe, but in international politics, you have to be just to win wars, otherwise you just end being another tyrant.

This was my recommendations in the Libyan war, that actually gave us a huge boost to popularity. Why? Well it is actually very simple. Just as United States really hated being under the british crown, everybody else hates being told what to do. People like to be free, so in order to give them that freedom, you cannot punch them around, you have to help them gaining their own freedom. That was the ethos behind the Libyan war, and has been, more or less, the ethos behind the Syrian war, we refrain from taking direct action, because people have to win their own freedom.

The net result is pretty clear; Libya is free, Tunisia is free, Iran yearns to be free. Egypt is really the problem right now, mainly because we were the hand behind the tyrant before, and because of the Muslim brotherhood, but the motive was clear from the beginning; we wanted to give them freedom.

Read more…