As we commence the next generation of flight from outer space to earth, we must also focus on the advancement of humankind on earth. This is as difficult as entering and leaving space, perhaps even more difficult, because man is such a wondrous and complicated being.

First of all, we have made some progress, by looking back. We have now realized, that in order to advance the economy of the West, to the betterment of not only the West but beyond, we must produce the goods ourselves. Production is moving back. There are many discussion on the taxation and cost of this and that. But bottom line, the advantage of a home produced item far outweighs the disadvantage. First of all, the production is much more stable, secondly it contributes to the welfare of the Nation, a frame we all have to contribute to, the best we can. If we need and want peace and prosperity, someone has to protect us. Since neither the EU or the common globalist movement, including many local sponsors seem to either want or are able to protect us, we need to support the framework that will; the nation and its loyal supporters. We do that, as businessmen through a loyal support of the country we live in. If a factory is placed in England, it will strengthen England, if it is placed in Wales, it will strengthen Wales.

Nations are all the rave again in the world. In the Arab world it seems to me, that we have a burgeoning renaissance. It touches my heart when arabs talk about the true sources of their misery; the lack of civilization. The philosophers who roamed the great Arab states are all gone now, almost forgotten. But in order to relive and reinvent the civilization that was so advanced, Arab states must advance themselves on their own premises. It should be done with the help of Israel, since Israel is honour bound to progress other nations, Israel cannot defy the Arab states if they wish to progress. It has to be initiated now, before the oil wealth runs dry.

First of all, it is about the understanding of mathematics. You see, the West initiated its progress basically through a single individual. A simple man coming from a minor provincial town of England, his name was Newton. This man, single-handed started the industrial revolution. How did he do that? By focusing 100% on mathematics. He showed the English public, that mathematics will give them a sure path to truth. It gave the West a way back into the depths of Egyptian lore, since mathematics is an Egyptian idea.

Read more…

To be realistic about the fight against the islamists, we have to be honest with ourselves as to where they are, and the alliances they have.

First of all, they are pushed back over many fronts, the major win we have had in Sudan is the crown of our effort to push them back, but they are not beaten yet.

One enemy we have lost sight of is the money men behind the islamist surge. Saudi arabia have pushed some economical means as to their continued existence, Iran some. But the major contributor to the continued effort to bring down America and the West at large is not the relatively poor and corrupt islamist countries (perhaps Saudi Arabia is not wholly an islamist country), but the financiers of Europe, and especially Scandinavia.

Scandinavia is, wholly and with the heart the suppliers of Al Qaeda and numerous islamist regimes in the world. It goes through a clandestine effort of the secret service to cover up the fundraising and moneymaking in Scandinavia by the local islamists, to the open support of the islamists by leading intellectuals and literati. The most decrepit and sinister actions of the state is the employance of hard-core islamists to teach our young about the virtues of islam, and the faults within the West in connection with the criticism of their holy prophet. Yes, this is the action of the state, a shame, especially after the gains Denmark had internationally in the aftermath of the Mohammad Cartoon crisis. A good example is the journalist who, on the Daily Politiken, supported vigorously the 9 / 11 arrangement, a certain Jacob Sheik, has been the educator of our young, at 400 arrangements in the high school. Sponsored by the state, in state schools. Can it be more corrupt?

Read more…

We are slowly moving ahead in the competition between nations. According to Abraham in the Thora, we are supposed to be the “light upon the nations”. What would that include in terms of meaning. There are two distinct meanings we could include in the idea. First, “light” is an Egyptian idea that, basically includes the notion of truth. So if we are to be the light upon the nations, we should be true to our values, and true to other nations values. The second implication is the notion, that we should be an example to follow. Understood in the sense, that we are casting a certain light, because the actions we do and the society that we create is so inspiring, that other nations will follow suit.

Already this is slowly initiated through the good companionship with both the Vatican state, United States of America, and the Russian state. We are the stewards of the holy land, and in this capacity, through honest and enlightened service, we put the holy land to the service of all who hold it truly dear.

Now, as democracy and nationhood expands in the world, we are entering a competition. When America polishes its feathers to lift off in another turn of dreaming, when the great Russian fighter will emerge itself in both love and light, when Persia will realize its potential as the steward of Zoroastrianism, we are in a deer and healthy competition. It is not an aggressive competition but an inward rebuilding of our own values and virtues.

This is the true meaning of “light upon the nations”, the true and serious search for the values of our faith, and the realization of it in actions. We have to do as we preach.

G-d bless Israel.

There are some alarming developments seen from an Israeli point of view, in Denmark these days. There is an election going on in the junior partner of the current socialist/communist government.

The election is basically a right wing/left wing competition within the party. Until now, the right wing of the party were leading the party. This had the effect that the critical stance against Israel was toned down. Not much, but enough to safe the face of the Nation, with a little helping hand of my own design. Basically I had to ridicule the party leader not to cause trouble between Israel and Denmark. Problem is, the party is in charge of the foreign minister post. The current chairman of the party is the foreign minister of Denmark.

Now, as the election of the new chairman progresses, the left wing candidate is the most succesful. Some of her ideas are absolutely ok, she fights for state to take care of elderly, poor and unemployed. The only problem is; the most powerful ministry they posses, is the foreign ministry. So they should, rightfully, be judged upon their foreign policy. And this is where we have a bit of a problem, seen from Israel. Because her stance on the israeli, palestinian conflict is made up in the late Arafat days. That is she is supporting the “palestinian people”, and she sees Israel as a more or less neo nazi occupier of the hapless palestinians. She obviously do not really now what is going on, but she pushes on regardless of the implications of the Israel/Danish relationship that would deteriorate as a consequence of her stance.

Read more…

Concerning the ongoing debacle with the Danish internal security system. There is just a basic point we need to make:

We need an explanation as to why the PET arranged a meeting at the 9/11, the day so many American, innocent citizens lost their lives in the blaze in New York.

We have proposed the simple action; stop the Islamist in Denmark, and stop collaborating with them. That is the request, and a fair one.

We have explained the consequence for a continued collaboration with the Islamists, and our appropriate actions.

As I touched upon in the last article, we need to refresh our approach to the internal security forces of the Northern European hemisphere. They are not working the right way.

Let us recapitulate. We have, in Libya, in Tunis and halfway in Egypt fought for arab democracy. We have had the opportunity to ignite a wonderful wave of freedom seeking societies, a feat none believed before we started. Likewise in Iran, we are on the brink of a system change, if we are diligent and extremely careful. We will bring peace to the Middle East and beyond.

But, there is a but. We are not protected in our own homelands. The internal security forces are using the goodwill the military creates to shelter the exact enemies we fight abroad. Creating a situation where we are extremely vulnerable in our homes. It has come to the extreme, where our own daughters are passed around as slaves in Islamist rings. This is not tolerable, not at all. Add to the rise of antisemitism, and the picture is a Gauguin mixed with Picasso on very bad day.

Now, we need to mend that. So far, the internal security forces have not responded to our criticism, and our means are too violent for them to really understand. Killing people is the craft of the warrior, but the craft is a forceful weapon to use on soft and meek citizens. We need another approach, but first we need to understand what motivates the traitors of the internal security forces. It is a mix of two:

1. Fear

2. Ideology

Why do the internal forces keep persecuting me and my friends? Because they are afraid. They got scared, a lot, under the Mohammad Cartoon crisis. Now, this is the intention of the Islamists. That is what terror really means. It means striking fear in the enemy, (us). Terror is a subjective feeling. If we really look at the true strength of the Islamists, it is not much. They have some half-baked street thugs they can scare the citizens with, and, potentially a nuclear bomb in Iran. But compared to the combined strength of the West, it is not much. Add to this the fabled and disgraceful cowardice of the Islamists. (They only fight when they are sure to win). They are not a force to be scared of. Take the example of the Mohammad film made in the US. If we simply ignore them, nothing happens. It is a psychological game, where they are, to be blunt; faking. In poker you would say that they are playing as though they have a full house on a very bad hand.

So the fear our cowardly security forces are reacting with, is just a fools game.

Read more…

We have a problem in Northern Europe. Let me be absolutely frank about it; there is a concentration of Islamist power in the northern region. It has come about through infiltration of the UN, forcing the UN to send so called “refugees” to Northern Europe, picking Islamists footsoldiers to send to asylum camps. Not all the refugees have been Islamist footsoldiers, but a great part of them have. This has created, together with a 1990 style import of Arafat Palestinians, an underground of Islamist controlled and active network in the Northern Europe.

Now, things have changed, the Arab spring has weakened the Islamists considerably and together with the spirited fight against the different Al Qaeda franchises, the Islamist are weaker than before. This has also created a democratic muslim network, primarily among Iranian expats, some of them my good friends.

Now, the EDL, SIAD and the other defense leagues are made up of patriotic citizens of the northern european countries, they are, in all respect, representatives of the military fighters. They are the persons who fight in Afghanistan who at home confront the same enemy  they fight abroad.

This movement, that is, mainly controlled and organized by serious patriots without a racist agenda, they have been vilified and persecuted by internal forces. Me myself, I have had my family torn to pieces, and cannot get a job both because of the public vilification, and, I suspect, a helping hand of the secret services, in Denmark called PET.

Read more…

We can discuss how Israel should contribute to the conflict with Iran. First of all, the problem is; it is a war. War is one of the most difficult things to handle in terms of ethics. There are several problems. If you just fight, you might win, but it can be meaningless without an ethical aim. Let me give you an example. When Goliath fought David. What would the ethical aim for Goliath be? I mean, David was a smallish and young boy with only a sling. It would not be an honourable victory, and he would be seen as a tyrant if he won. That would, potentially fall back on his army.

Now, David had a mission, and it was an ethical mission; he wanted to free his people. He did so, and therefore won a lot of honour, and his path towards kingship was initiated.

The same goes with Iran. If we conduct the war as Goliath, we would not win any honour, and as a consequence our standing in the world would diminish and it would, potentially, give us a lot of trouble.

We somehow need to envision an ethical aim with the conflict to survive as a nation.

Read more…

We are now witnessing an emerging democratic movement in Iran. It seems to me, that not only are the Iranians tired of the economic sanctions that has been put the land, but they are actively voting, with their feet, for democracy.

In the past few days, an initial uprising has been seen in the markets of Teheran, where the money exchangers roam. This is a combined desperation and democratic urge we see emerge.

Now, this has to be supported. I support it 100%, I really do believe, that the Iranians, if they have the opportunity to be free, they will take that opportunity.

We all wish to be free, if we can. Sometimes we strive so hard, that the police will come and take us. This happens all the time in Iran. If we are not there to help them, when they cry for freedom, what are we as persons and fighters for democracy? We are not faithful to our values. So, be it Israel, and the US, and Russia, I hope we all will support the will of the Iranian people.

We will see, there is a fierce contest between the two presidential competitors these days in America. I have a close relationship to Mr. Barack Obama. But I know, that whoever will be the head of America, they will support the freedom of the Iranians. It would be a dire sin not to.

Read more…

We are talking a lot about red lines these days. Problem is, we need to qualify the idea a bit to really understand the discussion as such.

I fact in the book “Courage, wisdom and justice” you can see in the right column, I discussed the principle with Mr. Herbert Pundik the former editor of the daily Politiken and a veteran peacemaker. According to his idea, in politics you always have to listen to the “red line” of a opponents discussion. If you do not understand where his red line is, he will go to war and start attacking you. On the other hand, it is also very important to be clear about your own red line, so that the opponent will know when you are ready to fight physically with your opponent.

This is why Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu is talking so much about red lines, he is trying to convey the feeling of “this is the limit we are willing to go to”, and the message is clear, Israel will not accept a nuclear armed Iran, because it is too dangerous for Israel.

Read more…

When it comes to the defense of free speech, there can be absolutely no discussion; it is not to be suppressed in any way possible. It is the first principle of democracy, and there is no way to control a curbing of it in any rational way. Either we have it, or we do not have it.

The reason why freedom of speech is such a central principle is manifold.

Let me take you a bit down in history to celebrate some of the turning points.

The very first invention of anything close to freedom of speech was by the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten. He is the true founder of all monotheistic religions, that is Judaism, Christianity and Islam. In his view, the sun would be an impersonation of the spiritual realm, and the rays would be its way to reach humanity; hence illumination. Now this illumination on earth is the truth. Speak the truth he said, because in this you would be close to heaven. How can we be on a path of truth, if we cannot speak freely?

Fast forward to Greece, here there is first the renowned philosopher Parmenides from Elea. In his philosophy you could walk on the path of opinion or on the path of truth. How can we walk the path of truth if we cannot speak freely?

The most important philosopher however, when it comes to democracy is Socrates. Socrates was a genius in the Hellenic world, he personally changed the entire stream of philosophy without writing down a single word. He said; I am the wisest man in all Greece, because I know I do not know anything. His philosophy is basically one single point; there is one place where we can find truth, and that is in dialogue. This was refined by first Plato and thereafter Aristotle, who gave us what we know as moderne science, through the first french renaissance. Socrates died  because he believed in freedom of speech.

These are the most important of our ancestors who gave us the central point of principle when it comes to democracy. But there are others as Voltaire who was the example of the second french renaissance, or Poul Henningsen here in Denmark. Who fought, with their life at stake, for freedom of speech. Lately we have had a bit of a confrontation between some Islamists and Denmark concerning freedom of speech. Everybody else, or most, have backed down on the principle, except your most beloved or hated philosopher Asger.

Read more…

We are soon entering a vital phase of the election; the debates. These debates are crucial, because here the contestants are facing each other in a fierce battle on words and ideas. We need to be prepared, very prepared.

I cannot contribute with all the details we have to be in control of, but I can support with some basic reflection, on the some of the issues, I have had the honour to work with.

In a debate, as in any other contest, it is all about initiative. Who has the ball. So, from the beginning we need to be hard pressing on the issues we know are weaknesses. First and foremost, the main disadvantage of Romney is foreign policy. He has fumbled in this field, overwhelmingly. His nice, but unmartial stance on the issues are not really working. Yes, he supports Israel, but really, can you see the soft and loving grandfather be a Ronald Reagan or George Bush? No, he seems to meek to me. He would not have the true balls to take on that fight.

Now, he has also no idea about the current state of diplomatic equilibration. He has no clue about the standing we are in when it comes to Russia or Iran.

He knows a little about Israel, and a little about China that is it.

He does not understand, that what we are facing, if we fight along cold war lines, is turning the cold war into a hot war. That would be absurd, but that would be the reality. So, we need to ask him what he thinks will really happen if he attacked Iran full force? How would he imagine the power calibration of the Middle East would react to it. The most possible reaction would be an inflaming of the entire Middle East, and that would, potentially spread to the rest of the world, and a third world war would initiate.

Therefor, the most rational approach is a slow but mounting pressure, that might, might not result in a system change scenario. This has been the strategy until now, and it has paid off in a much more stable and less war-torn Middle East. Yes, there is Syria right now. But, the alternative could have been all out war.

The long goal is to make system change in Iran, for the sake of the Iranians, with the consent of Russia. This would effectively end the cold war, and it would, if everything goes well, introduce a much closer relationship to Russia.

Read more…

We are soon entering a direct confrontation with China, and now also Taiwan wants to play. In the confrontation between Japan, Taiwan and China with regards to the minute islands far from any of the three powers, it is all about the money. As I am informed, there is a lot of oil beneath the islands, so the three powers are fighting over it.

This leads to the open and very clear conclusion; we need to get our business, in terms of production, out of China. We can still trust the japanese, but China is not to be trusted. I think the aquisition of the halfmade aircraft carrier bought from Ukraine on the pretext, that it was supposed to be a casino, talks for itself. Especially since it is floating around, close to a possible enterance in the conflict with japan and Taiwan. We are facing a potential face off between the three powers. America will be hard pressed by Japan to enter into the conflict, but the strength of America is sucked up by China, so it is not a situation that is, in any way, sustainable in the long run. We need those factories back to Ohio.

Read more…

In regards to the Iranian threat to Israel, that continues as a possibility we cannot ignore. I have the following ideas and thought as to how we can prepare a peaceful solution to the threat. Maybe not absolutely peaceful, after all, war is a dangerous endeavour, but a solution with the least amount of violence involved.

Let me begin with a story. My grandfather’s brother was an amazing person of his time. Imagine a man of the last century; strong, upright, just and warm at the same time. One of the persons you would wish you had as a grandfather.

He was an enlightened schoolbuilder. His life’s work was a Højskole in a place called Snogerup. a grand theater of learning and wisdom. A place for the young to attend to attain not barren and reproduced knowledge, no, a place for real wisdom.

Being a leading intellectual and a staunch supporter of the liberal cause, he went on a mission to the Faroe Islands. Imagine that place. It is called the most well-preserved island community in the world; avast with monumental cliffs and thunderous waves beating at the shore in an endless battle between sea and the puny refuge of an old tribe.

Denmark has had the stewardship over the Faroe Islands for a thousand years, all the way back to the viking ages. So it is an ancient relationship between the Islands and the mainland. Often there has been a bit of a tendency to break free of the proud islanders.

So my grandfather’s brother wanted to mend the rift that was between the islanders of Faroe and the people of Denmark, and he went on a mission.

He set up camp in the most conservative of conservative camp of the Faroese, and he had a message. He said; I represent the spirit of the people of Denmark, we realize, that it has not always been perfect, and for this we are sorry. We do respect the wishes of the Faroese, and we wish to make peace.

Read more…

When talking about conservatism, it seems to me that Romney at the meeting in may, was a strange carricature of a conservative. Mind you, I should know, being a conservative philosopher myself.

What is it really to be a conservative? Well, these days many conservatives tend to look at the ideas of Adam Smith and his free enterprise ideas. During the Bush administration it was put to its extreme, and it is not wrong to say, that it has run its course as an idea we can use, as Keynesianism, on the other side.

We need to remake the idea of conservatism, and although conservatism can be many things, there is however one thing it is for certain; it is the ideological fight for justice.

Justice has always been at the center of anyone who would want to support country, faith and the wellbeing of man.

How could we then put these basic ideas into a new use? Well we would first have to discuss what justice really is. Justice is an ancient idea, that was first defined in Babylon and in Egypt. The Babylonian idea is more what one would understand as a conservative version, since it goes hand in hand with the aristocratic ideas later put forth by the orders of the knights.

It is simple. According to Hammurabi, the Babylonian king who invented this first step of civilization, we have law to protect the weak against the strong. In an uncivilized world, it is the strong that will rule the weak, so to control that, we put up rules, to protect the farmer, the child, the normal citizen against the strong criminal.

Seen in an international view, it is the same that goes into the fight against tyranny. Here again it is the strong tyrant that will subdue the weak citizen, and through at helping hand, and ultimately the government of democracy, constructed over the rule of law, is the redemption of the weak of the states of the tyrant.

Read more…

Talking about “Islamists” all the time, one could like to discuss what an Islamist really is, and whence the idea, or det definition came from. It might sound preposterous, by I really believe I coined it. It was in the aftermath of the Mohammad Cartoon crisis, that i joined SIAD. Stop Islamization of Denmark. At the time it was basically an unknown smallish group in northern Jutland. So I did not know it, and basically nobody else knew it. But on it goes, I joined forces with Anders Gravers, and we envisioned a new strategy to stop the Islamization.

I did much of the strategic work, and Anders was the chairman; the head of the organization.

My idea was basically pretty simple. After reading most of what I could get my hands on of literature defining and discussion Islam (most of it critical). I realized, that Islam is a system very much like our own, just structured in a totally different way that ours. But the basic building blocks were the same; they had a rule of law, at state, and a religion connected to that. They call it sharia, Ummah, but it is the same, it is the nation and the rule of law.

Now, to make a critical stance towards Islam, I however needed to understand where the precise conflicts were, and where not. I realized, that there is no real conflict between our religion and the religious parts of Islam. Both Islam, Christianity and Judaism has, as a religious goal to support the nation.

So the conflict was in the political sphere. We are democrats, or rather, most of the West, and now also the East are believers in the Socratic ideals of free speech, humanism and the rule of the people. Add to this items as enlightenment and justice, and you had the Western/Eastern political project.

So in order to define ourselves in opposition to Islam, we are the democrats opposed to a religious state.

In Islam justice is found in the Koran and, ideally, as a divine definition, in our system it is done by the elected politicians, ideally as the will of the people.

Therefor, I proposed Anders, that we see ourselves as defenders of our democratic states in opposition to muslims who do not respect the democratically founded items of state. That is the rule of law and the rule of the people over the law.

We stressed, that we define the opposition of our project as politically driven muslims. We defined secular muslims, that is muslims who believe in democracy, as absolutely ok, and muslims who believe in sharia and the ummah as the antagonists of the Western Democracies.

This ideology spread through SIAD to numerous political parties, and through Danish Peoples party to the rest of the Danish society, and from there the rest of the world.

That is the story, and the power of philosophy.

Read more…

In the conflict with the Islamist controlled Iran, we are en deep waters. They have finally used one of the big guns; coordinated attack on embassies over the entire Middle East. They did it with the Mohammed Cartoons, and they are trying to do the same with a new film.

Here are some of the pieces of experience we made in Denmark in the same situation:

1. It is all theater. It is not about winning any territory, or really because they are angry because of so-called “insult to their prophet”. It is a political happening. In Denmark they even imbued the happening with extra pictures that were really insulting to Muslims. If they were genuinely offended, why would they then make up extra pictures of the prophet really offending.

2. Negotiation does not work. The happening is a happening. It was like when the flower powers planted flowers in the guns of the soldiers. They did it to make a political statement, it was not about obtaining anything. They just wanted the attention.

3. The campaigners are not really that many. Since it is a political happening, it is mostly organized by political insiders. So it will be the faithful, not the people as such.

4. Being scared does not make any difference. They are in it for the scaremongering, so just stand firm, take it with calm, and deal out the necessary, just, actions.

Now these political (violent) protest are not there for just the entertainment of muslims, christians and jews alike. They are there to serve a political aim. This aim is a bit difficult to understand. But understanding the mind of the leading Iranian Islamists, it does not have to serve a direct aim, it is just a happening of chaos. Remember, the leading supporters of Ahmadinejad are chaos worshippers, they are the SS of the iranian system. They are basically as wacko as the SS was with strange ideas with occult meaning.

Read more…

We wonder from whence the ideas of freedom came to the descendants of the northern people. It is old. In the old times, before we were christianised, we had freestates and freethinkers. So it is traditions that is as old as we are.

Now, there are many who threaten freedom all the time; Islamists, corrupt socialist governments, bureaucracies run mad. It all comes down to the same problem; tyranny. They like to rule and control other people, especially people they somehow dislike, be it the men of the West, the jews or the men of the East.

Sometimes they like to try our freedom, to see if we are still awake, or the corruption has got us chewed up. We were awake when the islamic hordes were here the first time, that was a time of Holger the Dane. According to myth, there will be a time where he is awakened, when Denmark is in mortal danger. He will rise as foe of old times, and start his songs of fighting.

My feeling is, that he is not totally awake but there are glimpses here and glimpses there. When he is totally awake, the foes of the descendants of Denmark will not be happy, but will meet a adversary of an imaginable force.

Let us remember that this day when we send our thoughts to the hapless civilians who lost their innocent lives in the flames of the dying twin towers. That day pushed us to remember a thing or two about freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of conscience and freedom of a man to follow his own destiny uncontrolled by tyrannical state.

These are some of the values we have fought for, Denmark and America in unison for years, let the years be many more.

G-d bless the forgotten, the persons in pain and families who lost so much on the 9/11.

Understanding the current crisis of the West should be the starting point for a medication. You have to know why the West is in its predicament before you can prescribe medication.

The reason why we are in a crisis is because we are corrupt. We do not anymore serve the basic principles of the nation. We tend to go our own way and look for ourselves instead of joining hands and work together for a solution. Listen, the current crisis will not be dealt with if we continue to think that we can just take another sleep in the hammock. It will only work if we stay loyal to the principles of our nation. We need that common goal to pull things together and work for the reenergizing of the nation.

Read more…

Long ago, almost before the memory of man, we had an enlightenment, the halls of Hammurabi, the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, the walls impenetrable made by the minds of the greatest philosophers. It was prescribed, that one day, all of these ideas would reemerge, and the nations would shine again. This process is now, we have seen it in glimpses by Mr. Barack Obama, we have heard it whispered by Mr. Netanyahu. Let it be heard, that never again will the light of the nations be dimmed.

Now, g-d blessed, these ideas are reemerging. They were there all the time, it just took the internet and a theoretical nerd to dig them up. It could have been me, or someone else. But the advent of the internet gave everybody with the time and the skill to look for the principles of the nation the possibility and the ability to do it.

It is an ironic thing, that just as the West seem to have lost the light of the nation, we see it reappear. We see it shining once again. As Mr. Biden said, it is now or never, we are on a hinge, do we wish to die as a civilization or do we wish to reemerge again.

They have a word for it in France, when they dug up the principles of the Nations a few hundred years ago, they call it renaissance. The rebirth of the nation. They sung it, they fought for it, they died for it. A simple idea, worth giving your life for. Why? Because it will give your children and your best friends, and your family a chance to live a better life. It is a well proven, fact checked robust system that just work.

Read more…

To really change things, we need to understand how change works. I have studied it for some time, to really get a deeper understanding of the issue. Here are some of my conclusions.

According to Aristotle, there are in fact three modes of change: Alteration, change and growth.

Alteration is when everything changes at the same time, what you would also call a revolution. As when Cuba changed from some kind of democracy to communism. The entire system changed. Also in nature we have these sudden changes as in spring where a barren place suddenly becomes full of life. Alteration is the fast change.

Change is when some kind of theme or thing changes its principles. Aristotle gives an example. He tells about a bronze shield that changes from being round to being square. The thing itself; the shield is still bronze, and it might even work as a shield to some extent, but the principle of roundness has disappeared and become square. The amount of bronze is still the same, so no growth has happened.

The last principle of change is growth. Growth is what happens, when the mass or quantity of a thing increases. The opposite movement; corruption or decrease, is what happens when the quantity decreases. Growth does not move a thing, but the thing stays at one point, and expands its boundaries relative to its growth.

Now, these are all good principles, and being Aristotelian, they carry some weight. But how may we use these principles to really create prosperity in our nations?

Read more…

If Iran needs to change it would meet a welcoming hand of the West, and off cause of Israel. Let us be honest with the islamic republic. In reality it is a bit like the Nazis take over of Germany. They seized the moment. In a situation of chaos and distress, they were the strongest opponent to the turmoil, and the people turned to them.

What they got however, was not what they had hoped for. They hoped for a more free and human society, they got a terrible control fixed system. Where everything is in order, to the most minute detail.

The backside of the Islamist society is a secret service no less formidable than the most effective SS sponsored project. The SS wore black leather coats, like the angels destruction, emblazoned with the skull of death on their caps. The secret service of Iran are mechanators of destruction, well-trained, purposeful and dedicated to the system.

Now, that has been a living hell for the most Iranians. Iranians are proud people, rightfully so. A culture descending from Zoroaster, Cyrus. Iranians invented the idea of good, and major parts of christianity are actually Zoroastrian traditions, conveyed through Mithraism into early christianity. Christian supper is a Zoroastrian tradition.

So, to the intellectually enlightened, there are many bonds that bind the West to the Persians, and the iranian traditions should be respected.

Read more…

We are witnessing a major shift in the power struggle of the international world these days; the waning presidency of Mr. Barack Obama, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, the advent of chinese powermingling, and the rise of Mr. Mitt Romney.

First of all, the latest international political development has been without my consent, and honestly, to be frank, these moves are counterproductive to not the US, but to Russia.

Russians are always worried about double-acting and hidden agendas. Look, if it is true that there is a deal between Putin and Barack Obama concerning the foes of the fertile crescent, the Russians are really at the loosing end. Let me explain. If the western powers enter Syria and conquers together with the Arab allies, well who is to lose? Russia will, most probably lose its Tartus base. An extremely important base to Russia. This is the reason why the russian generals are against the move. That is a long-term loss. The stance of America will change if Mitt ascends to the presidential honours. It will start supporting Israel again, and the power play will tilt back to the traditional Western approach. If Syria has fallen to the West at that point, the West would have both Syria and Israels back. Russia would lose its regional role in the Middle East, and the West would be the only serious player. I am not saying this to turn against the West, but to be fair the Russians.

But winning the Syrian war could turn out to be a Damocles sword to the West as well. Winning a victory and turning Syria into another Sharia/Islamist governed country like Egypt would be just another folly. So, everything is extremely murky, and nobody really gains anything from entering the Syrian conflict. Off cause, the humanitarian consequences are too high to ignore it, but the only real political gain would be if Syria ended up a stable democracy, and that would, at least, imply a serious democratic development in the Arab states, chosen by the Arabs themselves.

Well, there are signs in the Arab world, that some intellectuals are realizing the potential of a true Arab renaissance. The Arab world are still in the dark ages. The development attained in the West is not implemented by the Arabs. It is a stale world, without any gain in terms of political development. In fact, it is a little ironic the West connected to the greek and classical Egyptian and Mesopotamian sources through Arab sources in the reconquest of Andalusia.

The Arabs are welcome, anytime, my email and telephone number is accessable, just call, I will be happy to let the Arabs in to the secrets of the Nation. After all, Islam is also a descendant of the covenant Abraham made with spirit. Remember the idea of the monotheistic religions are as a support of the Nation. I am 100% jew, but I would be happy to help the Arabs to regain democracy.

Read more…

One of the main principles we have to discuss is justice. As Abraham was promised we would be an example of justice. So, what is justice really? I have touched upon the subject before, and the thing is; there are many definitions of justice, all the great philosophers of the classic greek age had one, and we are also bound to understand at least Babylon and Egypt to understand a justice definition worthy of Israel.

Now, there are two basic principles we have to take into consideration; the Babylonian and the Egyptian. I have done extensive studies in the field of ancient justice philosophy, and I think there is, at least two profound realizations to be done. Firstly there is the lawstone of Hammurabi. On this it says that the law was made to protect the weak against the strong. Now how may we interpret that. Basically, I believe that Babylonian intellectuals must have had the same realization of justice in nature as the Greeks. After all, the Greeks were highly inspired by both Phoenicia and knew the cities in the fertile crescent quite well.

The greek realization was according to Empedochles and Plato, that in nature, the weak succumb to the strong. We can see it in uncivilized areas without law, here it is the rule of the strong. Often gangs of different kind. We see it in South America in the Favelas, we see it in Europe in the ghettos (immigrant ghettos). Read more…

The covenant we made with lord, was made thousands of years ago in another age, in another mindsetting. We are entering war. As Obama is deploying warriors to the Syrian civil strife, the conflict with the Iranian/Syrian/Russian (chinese) faction is stepped up.

In this rising conflict, we need to understand and remind ourselves of the covenant we made with spirit, or rather Abraham made with spirit. What was it, that we were promised, and what were the deal on our side. It is quite clear, if you understand the covenant on the mindset of the Babylonian age Abraham lived in. He is promised to be the father of all nations. If, at the other hand, he works for the absolution of the idea of a nation.

Now, what is a nation? To understand this, we need to understand the ideas that roamed in the fertile crescent at the first stage of human civilisation. A nation is, as we know from both antique semitic/egyptian sources and the antique greek sources, what we, today know as democracy. The core of democracy is human rights and that is the rule of law. Added to this is a complex system of layers of power; the king, the aristocracy and the people. Now, as in Babylon, the democratic ideal has its failures; it creates moral and ethical disintegration. This is why Abraham had a task to do; to stop the moral failing of the nations. To spread love and kindness, but also righteousness and justice.

So religion is an integrated part of the nation-state.

Read more…

To understand the implications of the current occurrences of the world, one has to understand nature. Why are we at war with most of the muslim world, and other parts of the world? Is it because we are racist, or they rectify old colonialist scores? On a superficial level, there is some truth to that argument. We are responsible for some of the worst atrocities in modern history. Just remember the red indian and the slaughter of their habitat and society. Or the south american persecution of the Aztecs and the Maya.

But on a deeper level, the conflicts we see today is something completely different. Let me give you an example. On the easter Island, there was once a magnificent culture. It left us awe-inspiring monuments as the giant statues buried on tons of rubble. What happened to that impressive culture? It was destroyed partly from external influence, and partly from overpopulation. After many years of steady improvement, suddenly there was not enough space. The arable lands were too few to produce enough food for the people living on the islands. What happened? War. The tribes of the islands started fighting over the arable land and the possibility to harvest from land and see. This was a war of territory. The ideological content of the war was very diverse and impressive in its idea, but beneath the warcrys and the intellectual ideas, was the simple fact, that it was all about survival. They were too many.

Now when the West populated the American continent, it was, basically the same. There were a surplus of inhabitants in Europe, and the power of the Europeans to make conquest, and we conquered America.

So what are the basic principles of this development? It is the rule of strong. The stronger part of a warring tribe will conquer the weaker part. Now, strength comes both in terms of material wealth and possibilities, and it comes in terms of intellectual strength. A rich culture can be weak in terms of intellect. This is exactly the problem of the West right now, or was untill before the Mohammad cartoons. The Mohammed cartoons, brought an initial awakening to the West. We started to arm ourselves in terms of principle and ideological prowess.

Read more…

Being a Dane, I have a special relationship to the English. It goes back thousands of years.

I will tell you English a little story, or perhaps a few stories. The first time I really had a deeper understanding of England it was because I read the story of the founder of my philosophical line; Grundtvig. He was very interested in an English story, and he persuaded the King to send him to Cambridge to study that little story there. Remember this was around two hundred years ago, so the reality was a little different at that time.

Grundtvig enrolled in the ancient and amazing institution of England, where Newton has roamed among others. And he started studying the little story. He met a certain English lady, who taught him about freedom in the Anglo-Saxon version, and he studied on.

The story he was interested in was the story; Beowulf. I got hold of the story, and started to read it. And it dawned upon me why Grundtvig was so interested in the story. Because it started with the exclamation, it said; We the Westdanes. Grundtvig was a historic philosopher, searching for the roots of Denmark; the mythological and folkish roots. So he was interested in the English story, because it was a part of Danish story as well. The thing is, in the time of Beowulf, the English were Danes, we were the same people. That is why most of our traditions and the feeling between Denmark and England is so similar. We are not a colony, or a part of the central european mess, we are sailors and warriors like you.

Now, that is why I tried, very hard, to help you guys. It is not a superficial or political project. It is the calling from thousands of years back, when we were one that spurred me.

Read more…

To do business, one has to be cunning, industrial, but also honest and straight. It is funny, often businessmen are portrayed as evil and deceptive, especially in Denmark where the socialists hold sway over vast parts of the public service and media.

But, to my experience it is often the other way around. The conservative businessmen, that is, the old and established owners of business, they are much more interested in how people fare in the local community than in China.

Now there are however the new businessmen, they are often prone to flash their wealth buying expensive clothes and jewellery. But common for all; they have to run a business. How do they actually do that? Well, they do it to their best knowledge, and, often to the traditions that are brought to them through many years of experience. Take the shipping business here in Denmark, it has its traditions, and they go all the way back to the time we were vikings.

But, we need to understand what a business really is. I stumbled upon a gem og wisdom when I read an ancient scroll of philosophy. This scroll relates the story of a certain philosopher called Bion. Bion was a Platonist, and a contemporary of Plato. He was a philosopher like Socrates; lively, intelligent and provocative. He did not write any books, but some citations are preserved in the writings of Diogenes Laertius.

Bion says, that wealth is the sinew of business.

How do we interpret that? First of all, a sinew is a part of an individual living being. In a body you have the head, and you have the sinew. The sinew is the part of the body, that will work as a motor of the body. It is the propulsion. The part that will move the body from a to b.

Read more…

What Russia will contribute to the earth with in the forthcoming years, Russia will have to decide for herself. It is with great awe we look upon the amazing country so vast and strong. We, as danes, are some of the original source of some of the Russian culture, men and legacy. We still remember the great cities in Ukraine, these cities were settlements of Danes and Swedes.

This gives us a sense of shared identity. Off cause, with all the things that has happened after the cities of Ukraine fell to the Tartars, Russian society has changed, and is not the same as the Danish. Due to its size, Russia is also stronger and much more imperial.

I am worried about the war. War is coming, it is in the air, and I am worried about the outcome of the war.

Read more…

To really understand the debt crisis, one has to understand the background of the crisis. There are several principles at work here. The most basic is the corruption of democracy. According to Plato (and many other contemporary philosophers) the backside of the shining coin of democracy is corruption. There are several methods to stop the corruption, the most important is off cause enlightenment, that is the enforced transparency of the society.

But there are other institutions to hinder the corruption of society; the law, the faith, the family.

Now fast forward to economics, what we have in the current system is an unbalanced system. On one hand we have free market theories based upon Adams Smiths “The wealth of nations”, basically it states, that the freedom of trade will be a boon to all nations implied.

On the other hand we have Keynes, who believe that the investment in the state and state sponsored project will boost the economy, so that it will create jobs and so on.

Combining the insight of Plato with the current state of economic theory, what would the insightful reader notice? He would probably notice, that the one side is talking about freedom, the other side is talking about economical motivation. What is missing?

Read more…

To win, you need to enter a battle where you are strong. In the economical battlefield, you are not strong. This is due to many factors, mainly that a social democratic/Keynesian investment politics does not work in a globalized economy. Investment in infrastructure will not give you any permanent job creation, because the true production of goods are not done in the country, but outside the country. So the long-term objective of Keynesian economics; to boost production is not working anymore.

This is one of the reasons I proposed a Adam Smithian/ethical economic plan. Problem is just, that it is so new, that nobody knows about it yet. It still is the right remedy to the current crisis, but the intellectual spheres has to understand the ideas behind it to support it. Since I am virtually unknown in academic circles, no one have the insight into the principles of the policy, and keep on discussing Keynesian economics.

So, you need to open a new front. This is why i proposed the Civil rights front. What would that give you? First of all, it would give you a platform where you are the strong. Behind the economical discussion lies an identity discussion. Do americans identify with the basis; the constitution, the law, the principles of American democracy or do they identify with their race.

Read more…

Talking about the Iranian threat we are in a terrible situation. We are, basically caught up between the Sunni and the Shia competition in the fertile crescent. And we need to be extremely vigilant, not to make a wrong move.

Behind the competition between the Persians and the Arabs another, much more dangerous equilibration lies; the old cold war competition between the West and the East.

Really the competition is over, seen from an ideological perspective, but in real life, practical power stratification it is still very much in existence.

What we risk in pushing United States of America into a war with Iran is a third world war along the lines of cold war stratifications.

I do not say this to make a judgement on the strategy of Israel at this point, but to give a strategical explanation to some of the reluctance of the military establishment as to why they are a bit reluctant to engage in full war.

On the other hand, a nuclear armed Iran is not acceptable to anybody, not The US, not the Saudis, not Europe, and definitely not Israel.

This leaves us little room to maneuver.

Read more…

Listen, when the civil rights movement, with that courageous and honest priest called Martin Luther King did all he did to stop the racist division of America, started. It was not about what he did not like, but what he dreamed about. It was not a negative or divisive message, he tried to find something that would unite not divide. He found something; civil rights. What are civil rights; they are the rights we all, with no preferation to skin colour, social background or economic advantage, have as equals. I have the right to speak freely, I have the right to vote, I have the right to be protected by law, I have the right to judged objectively by the state. I have the right to go to school, and send my children into a safe world, where things progress, and they are happy. This the dream Martin Luther King had.

Now, what it really does is, that it gives the basis of a platform that we all share. We make a frame, we all support to create a safe haven for all. We make common ground.

Now that dream is not helped during your first tenure. It was basically forfeit from the beginning, because the “whites” are scared. They see a country they used to be proud of become weaker and weaker. And what they do is the opposite of what would actually help; they become more distrustful and racially motivated.

Now it is a two-way process. To be honest, there are plenty of racist bigots on both sides of aisle. But that does not make the project of Martin Luther King forfeit. This is not the time to lose faith, this is the time to fight. This is the defining moment. Let us be honest. We cannot win on the economic fortunes of the current system, it is not working. Some of it basically obstruction, some of it is international malaise. But it all comes down to winning the hearts and the minds of all.

Read more…

When you are persecuted, you have to run to keep alive; make new friends, skip the ones, who are actively trying to take your life in this and that respect. Be vigilant, and hard to the idiots and betrayers around you.

They always have an excuse. The most horrendous is the ones who actively try to take your livelihood and peace “for your own sake”. They think you are “misguided”, some do it because they believe you are “psychotic” or something else. Persecution has many names.

The media in the corrupt state is in now is trying to censure you as much as they can. I have had the honour to be censured in a semiautonomous blog/newspaper called “The Free”. Call that a bigotry act.

Now the right wingers persecute me because I am not 100% ethnically Danish. With my half jewish mother and muslim father, I am not to be trusted 100%. Good ol race bigotry, all white ass holes (sorry about the pronunciation). Not all off cause, but a sizeable part “do not trust me”, or believe I use “double standards”. In the Hedegaard case it all came into practical fruition with an all white (too many jews, unfortunately) supported the old white male, and backstabbed the young “racially mixed” person. Disgusting.

On the left the issues are different. There I am “too national”. Or, they do not like my patriotism. Come on, just because I am not 100% race white, I do like Denmark, I do like Israel, and I wholeheartedly believe in the idea of the nation. I did dig up all the basic ideas of the Nation, because, for me, it is not about race, it is about ideology.

Read more…

When we started the fight in Libya, we did it to set Libya free, and to strengthen the democratic development of the Middle East. Now, before we started that quest, the Middle East was all in defeat and under the rule of tyrants. We did start a movement, it halted to soon, and we should have continued it. But, be as it may, we did a lot of good.

Now, that is concrete and specific progress that we have done together; Europe and The United States in unison.

We stood behind you, we fought together, and we did some beautiful things in collaboration. Now, this is why Europe supports you. Now, you could say, that it does not matter, and the US could just focus on China and the possibilities there. But would the US be a better place for that on the long run? Would you not lose some of the ideas we create here in Europe and you can put to use in the great and free country? Take the insourcing idea, this was created here in Europe, and refined in the US. Is that not a good thing?

Well, having been beaten and prosecuted myself, haunted by the secret police, the media and my friends. I still believe, that having true friends matter. I still believe in the solidarity and love one shares with a good friend. And it is my experience, that true friends always try to support each. Yes there are crisis, but in the end we stand together.

Read more…

It is very important, that we fulfill a role as mediators and peacebringers of the world. Right now, there are two main powers of the world; Russia and The united States of America.

Both are vary of each other, and we stand, in all respects, right in the middle of the competition between the two. Well, both needs a friend that will accept them both, and try to mediate between them .

This role is, in some way a European role, and in some ways an Israelean role.

The problem is just, Israel is very new to the game, and, in some ways, I am sorry to say this, it is with the deepest respect of the legacy of all jews, but still, we need to play the international game of politics, a little more wisely.

When Bulgaria was hit by the latest antisemitic onslaught, it not only rocked the jewish world, but it also brought a few cracks into the vaguely initiating relationship between Russia and Israel. It is no secret, that Russia is behind Iran and Syria, and it is no secret that Russia was, indirectly responsible for the attack on the bus in Bulgaria. If it was an Iranian/Hezbollah attack, it is the proxy of Russia that is responsible. That is a very difficult situation for Russia to be in, add to this the success of the Obama administration in the Middle East theatre, and Russia is under a lot of pressure. Well, I have been one of the strategists behind the success of Obama, but, for me, it is very important not to lose the support of Russia. It is a partner of Europe, and a friend of Denmark.

Behind the problematic situation in Syria lies a competition between the Arabs and the Persians. And the arabs, being allied with me, has had a lot of success. But, this is not intended to wrap up the entire Middle East and give the Arabs opportunity to win and conquer, it was ment as a opportunity to make peace, and further the democratic and peaceful development in the Middle East.

Read more…

In my research to prove the existence of G-d, I have come to new eureka moment. It just struck me. After having read some really advanced and complicated hermetic philosophy for a while, I just realized what hermetic philosophy really is; it is the lore of the core of catholic faith. Why do the monks have vows of silence; to be able to hear the communication with G-d. Why do they keep all these ancient libraries under lock, because some of the lore of both Egypt and other sources of ancient wisdom, is still there to be procured, if the Vatican church chose.

Anyway, what is the problem of the church? It is a rising competition of what you would call Newtonian physics. Newton changed the game of the West in a profound way. Even though he was an alchemist and a magician, he really changed the way we look upon reality. How did he do that? By proving, beyond doubt, mathematically, his hypotheses. He had a knack of dominance in him. When people tried to discuss with him, he just wrote two or three pages more of mathematical proof. In this way he did succeed in proving gravity, even though gravity is a bit magical. But, the most basic contribution to the West, and now, more or less to the entire world, was his worldview. In this, you can prove things mathematically, actually the only serious prove is mathematics. Everything else is just superstition or knowledge not to be taken serious.

This leaves the hermetics in a bit of a weak situation, because most of hermetism is shrouded in secrecy, and very difficult to understand, and never really scrutinized by mathematics or dialectics.

Read more…

In The confrontation between you and Romney in regards of foreign policy, you have the best chance to beat him on your own terms. It is pretty obvious, that you have made a huge turn around. Before you came to power, the image of America was at its worst for decades. After the Soviet Union fell, America had a bit of a blossoming, but it faded again with Bush. Bush was an amazing guy in some ways, and he was a true dear friend of Denmark, he came here on his birthday once, that was a defining moment of Danish foreign policy. But he had his weaknesses, one of them was a bit of an insensitivity to other people around the world. In the Afghan war, in the Iraqi war very little was actually done to pay respect to the local citizens of the said countries, it was mostly gung ho, John Wayne military tactics. Do not get me wrong, I like Texas, in fact Denmark is, more or less, the Texas of Europe, but in international politics, you have to be just to win wars, otherwise you just end being another tyrant.

This was my recommendations in the Libyan war, that actually gave us a huge boost to popularity. Why? Well it is actually very simple. Just as United States really hated being under the british crown, everybody else hates being told what to do. People like to be free, so in order to give them that freedom, you cannot punch them around, you have to help them gaining their own freedom. That was the ethos behind the Libyan war, and has been, more or less, the ethos behind the Syrian war, we refrain from taking direct action, because people have to win their own freedom.

The net result is pretty clear; Libya is free, Tunisia is free, Iran yearns to be free. Egypt is really the problem right now, mainly because we were the hand behind the tyrant before, and because of the Muslim brotherhood, but the motive was clear from the beginning; we wanted to give them freedom.

Read more…

I just read the support Mr. Barack Obama gave to the poor people in Colorado. I do believe these words were genuine, and they are, I hope, comforting to the victims of the deed. I think it is a good thing not to blame and point fingers in such a tragic situation. No sane person would see these horrendous acts as a tool of politics. Besides it does not work anyway, so focusing on the victims was a considerate and caring thing to do.

We support you here from Denmark as well, and we carry your burdens as you carry ours.

Going to another topic. I would like all the members of the freedom and democracy organization that were so naive to give Lars Hedegaard a medal to hear my story. I know, that few of you will actually read these lines, since you have invested so much in the pretender.

Here it comes anyway, and at least maybe some of you will give the true victim some positive reenaction of my personal justice, and judge me upon the deeds I have done.

First of all. I am a Socratic/Platonic philosopher of a Danish/Jewish mould. My great, great grandfather was a pupil of the founding father of Denmark; Grundtvig. My great, great grandfather Ernst Trier, was a converted jew, and a proud carrier of Danish folk theory and education.

The tradition has been carried on from father to daughter to son in five generations. I am the last of my line with any serious attention to Grundtvig. My philosophy is a modern version of Grundtvigs.

Now, before I entered the political stage, I did not know much about politics. I basically was a naive, well-meaning idealist with no understanding of how things worked. I started my political career as a philosopher in the organization Stop Islamization of Denmark. It was right after the Mohammad cartoon crisis and everybody in the world was pretty scared. Now SIAD is a bit like EDL. Or rather EDL used, more or less, the model of SIAD as their starting point. So it is what one would determine “on the fringe”. The connection between nazis and the organizations are pretty easy to see, while as, in real life, SIAD emerged, after I worked with the chairman Mr. Anders Gravers, as a liberal alternative to Islam. The work I did with Anders more or less changed the world. The term “Islamist”, is one of the results, we worked on the definition of muslims, so that we, carefully, only attacked the muslims that worked on the political gain of Islam, and not he muslims with a purely personal faith in spirit.

Read more…

The world is rearranging itself along new lines, but following old lines. The time for democracy is both enhanced and diminished.

The role of Israel as a leader in the process is still up in the air. I hope Israel, with its legacy and potential will lead the way, but we will have to see, it is not certain, and many things can go wrong, but it is a distinct option to enhance the will of Abraham and his descendants.

Looking at the whereabouts of the world, we see new constellations forming. In the middle of Europe, the descendants of Rome are trying to rebuild a system in accordance with the Roman ideas of central management and direct control from the center to the periphery.

This process is contrasted with the countries of Europe that was not a part of the Roman empire. That is Denmark, England and beyond, Russia, partly Norway and Sweden. Unfortunately for Holland it is trapped to close to the epicenter of the new empire to be free. So they are forced to bow to the lords of the magistrate.

Now, this however leaves new room for an alliance of the Northern Europeans countries and the descendants. We can define a new entity of collaboration, based on the values we believe in.

What could that Northern European confederation look like? First of all, it should be a confederation based on freedom. None of us are very keen on being ruled by anyone, so it should be a chosen confederation, with the possibility to redraw from it always.

But it should, at the same time, be a place where we honour our law. It should be a place where we respect the law of the confederation as something holy.

This is how a Freestate is run, or was run until it was stopped around the 12´th century. We know this from the Icelandic sources, where the Freestate was kept living for the longest time.

Read more…

Defining the new paradigm of war, we have to understand the mechanics of war as of these days. Harking back to the two main war philosophers von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. We need to understand, that these philosophers are of another time. Sun Tzu is a bit more eternal than Clausewitz, and many of the basic principles of his philosophy still works; to understand yourself and understand the enemy is still paramount.

Clausewitz was a child of the democratic revolution, he accompanied some armies in the war between Germany and France. At the time, the time of Napoleon Bonaparte, war was a strategic measure of living men on either foot or horses put against each other in an intelligent manner.

Now, we still hold onto some of Clausewitz principles, but we need to fast forward til today. Before the Libyan war the Middle East powers were very succesful in their onslaught against the West. How did they do that? Basically they used our own corruption against us. By making often very elaborate Potempkin theatre, they portrayed Israel and USA as the evil incarnate. This was all lies, both Israel and the US are not perfect, but the slaughter of innocent children and so on, was all just lies.

So, in principle, what they did was to use the physical war as a theater to push their agenda in the media war. The genius of the principle was the fact that they realized that the media war was more important than the physical war. It worked as long as they could manipulate the Western, corrupt media, to their advantage.

Now, the Libyan war was a turning point. Why? because the situation in the world, mediawise, has changed. In the French democratic revolution, where the newspaper was invented as a propaganda tool, the practical reality did not matter much. The buccaneers could trumpet acts of valor, and nobody would know the truth from lies, because the newspaper had a monopoly of mediation.

Read more…

We are now entering another phase of the election. We won some in the first phase, and our arguments have resounded in the minds of the American people.

We have numerous enemies, and we have to shed some light on them. First of all, there is a vipers den, that we have made ourselves a bit; the connection to the Muslim Brotherhood. Now, people say, that there is no such thing as a muslim democracy. It is wrong, it can happen, Turkey is an example, but the differences between the basic tenants of Islam and Democracy are wide. This is the basic situation. Now The Muslim brotherhood was initiated to repeal and conquer us. They have been working on this almost since the inception of the brotherhood by Hassan Al Banna. Now this has cost us dearly. In Denmark, as an example, they have excelled in Sovietstyle infiltration of academia and culture. Right now we have a certain Burhan, a pop singer with dubious connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, he is all over the pop charts.

On the other hand, we have a democracy in Egypt now, and, at least for now, the Muslim Brotherhood are working along our ideas. I hope it is sincere, many people, among the jews are not so sure.

As the situation is, and the election is forthcoming, we need to make a strategy to counter the attacks by the Republicans based on the support we have given the Muslim Brotherhood. There is no idea in covering it up, it will surface the election from time to time, and we need to have an idea of how we counter the blow.

Read more…

The blast targeting the civilians was a move in the ongoing feud between the West and the henchman of the east; Iran.

For some time Ahmadinejad has been silenced, as he is under pressure from the leader of the clerics; Khameni. Ahmadinejad lost the election, and he lost together with his hardline section of the islamic revolution. The more Moderate Khameni is now firmly in power. This is however not an absolute closing call for Ahmadinjad, he still controls large part of the Iranian society, among it the secret service and other clandestine branches of Iran.

To understand the move, you therefore have to understand the motifs of Ahmadinjad. I say this, not as a cold strategical analysis, I understand the pain, I feel it myself, it is like having an arm ripped of. But we have to stay focused to avoid the effect of the stroke.

Back to Amhadinejad. Why would he pull off a major stroke right now? Because the position of Iran is deteriorating minute by minute. Syria is close to fall as an ally, Russia is drawing away a bit, The muslim Brotherhood is firmly in the arms of America. So on all sides the allys are giving away. This compared to a year ago, is a dramatic reversal of the game in the Middle East.

Now what would he gain from an attack on helpless civilians? He would gain at least one thing; the pain of Israel. But would he gain other things? Well, if he can provoke Israel into attacking the Iranian system in some way, he could sway Russia over to his side, and he could reinvigorate some of the iranian proxies as Hizbollah.

So it is a taunt, it is a provocation, engineered as a motif for us to retaliate.

Read more…

In order to realize the ultimate goal of zionism, we have to combine different items of philosophy and real world problems. Basically most modern political theories as communism and a great part of liberalism have the weakness of a limited scope.

The deepest theory is, by all means, the ideals wrought around democracy with its wellspring in France and England. But, compared to the scope of Plato and Aristotle, we still, at our current state, are limited by the distance to the original source of our culture.

An Israel should be a new idea based on the very core ideas of say Babylon, Egypt and perhaps some of the hellenic ideas.

We have to start with the beginning. First of all, it all started with Abraham. So the base of a spiritual definition of Israel should start with him.

Abraham defined the covenant we try to adhere to; that we should spread the rule of love all over the world, in every heart and every society. This is the core of Israel.

Read more…

There have been many redemptions from sure death and annihilation. The latest just the nazi persecution, but the repetition of persecution is like a wheel of a mill, again and again has it reached point one, and another turn in the awful threaths.

The iranian and sunni persecutions of the late negative round of fights are just another turn of the wheels.

This gives us a certain mindset, and a survival skill given to no other people. But it is both a strength and a weakness. The strenght of it is evident in the obvious fact that we have survived. The weakness is the mistrust we meet other people with. We always look for the negative trend, and we sometimes miss the positive trend.

Take the new positive trends from the christian churches. These are, in all simplicity, a tremendous boon to Israel. In practical life, it gives us the support of the Russians in the confrontation with Iran.

Now this is something, and a victory that has come about as a result of the expectations met. Why do Russia suddenly support Israel? It is because in the eyes of Russia, Israel is what it was in the days of Jesus Christ. They see Israel through the lense of him.

Jesus was a jew, and he represents the lore of jewish ideology two thousand years ago. So it would be a little strange if current judaism would be exactly the same as then. Many trends have appeared, started and evolved.

Read more…

The true mudlslinging has now begun. Dirty, immoral, awfull slander on your person.

Do not let you be dragged down of the effort, there are several counterstrokes to make to repel the barrage.

First of all, identify all the attacks on a prepatory basis. See them before they come, and let your team make a strategy for each of them. Most of the barrage are lies, so document that, and send the attack back from where it came. If they say this and this, let your teams specify exactly where they are wrong, and tell the real story. This strategy will hopefully work as a shield against the dirty attacks.

At the same time, keep up the attacks on Romney, but do it in an ethical way. The drawback of a negative campaign is that the negativity will rub off on yourself. People get a little sick of the slander and look for some positivity.

So attacks are good, but they should always be measured with a careful hand on spirit. If it is too harsh or dirty, and you are the sender, stop it. Factual, serious, critical and enlightening prodding is positive, because it will show the weaknesses of the opponent.

On the other hand, it is of vital importance, that we get through with some positive messages as well. This will hopefully contrast the negativity we are met with from Romney.

Let people feel your idealism, your faith, your ideas to build a better world, to make something more beautiful, free, courageous, responsible.

We have the good answers and a sound plan, this will bring us closer to the acceptance of the American people.

G-d bless America

The path of Israel is long and winding. It has been my privilege and honour to inspire some.

There are some victories we have celebrated, and the path we have chosen, has lead to more peace. Yet, there are many miles to wander and many obstacles to overcome.

Being a prophet of a kind, many of my prayers have gone to Israel, not because I want to be a hero or a man of honour. But because the implications of my enheritance gives me the incentive.

Prophets are supposed to bring new ideas and give principles to adhere to.

Some of the principles I have touted are brought to the modern day through many years of neglect. Like the principle of the spartan kings; always to be just in war. And by that principle win peace.

I have had the opportunity to present the principles to base the nation of Israel on. And they are just that; principles. I do not claim them for myself. They are princples, most of them, defined in another time and era, often at peaks of civilization.

However, I think the most precious principle I have realized is the principle of Empedochles. The realization, that strife and love are two siblings. This principle drives nature, and it is only if we realize, that sometimes we have to fight in order to attain love, that we will survive.

Combine this with the spartan principle, you have a recipe for peace. That is, sometimes, when you are under threath, you have to fight to protect love. But you should only do it, if the cause is just.

Take the fight with Iran. The just path was to fight the system, and not the people.

Principles are eternal. And I believe, that my humble contribution to the fundamental construction of Israel are there to be saved and remembered. It could carry us through to the other side.

G-d bless Israel.

When I first entered the antiislamic campaign. Well, I suppose I was naive. We all are, when we enter the international stage of politics. One of the most naive things of my own attitutede was the belief in the compatriots I chose. I thought, by being idealistic, I could change the world.

Well after many years of fighting. I realize, that what sometimes seem to be your best friend, is your enemy, and what seems to be your enemy is your friend. A good example is my friendship with Mr. Barack Obama. On paper we are supposed to be in two different camps. But in reality, we are friends, and have remained so for some years now.

Friends like the international liberties organization, DDL, EDL, you name them and you hate them. Are not friends. That came through to be with an extreme clarity here in the last organizational meeting, where Lars Hedegaard, got a medal for a trial where he did all he could to blame it on me.

This mountaneous feat, earned him the respect of all of the civil liberties alliance. Would you allow me to stand aside in disgust?

As you may have read before here on Rubicon, Lars Hedegaard used the entire trial to put the blame on me, and that is both wrong and NOT a defense of democracy.

You just lost me guys. Tommy Robinson, Lars Hedegaard, Alain Wagner, Mark Steyn and whoever. You know I made your every corner, you know I gave you a bed to sleep in, and a helping hand when you needed it. I did it, because we are supposed to be friends, guess what, we are not.

Friendship is based on loyalty and honour, this is the exact opposite.

We are now entering the holiday season of the election. Fewer people will actually look on our campaing, so we have to slow down just a little, not too much, just a little.

The relentless pressure on Romney have paid off in the strategic game, he is hardpressed, and his closest allies are leaving him. Going on a campaign train when he held a holiday was quite a hit, cudos for that.

We however can also press too much, and the electorate, especially in swings states as Ohio will tire of our pressure. Give them just a little breathing space, and save some money.

We have put him on the defensive, and he is, right now, trying to find a way to get into offensive. We will see if he will choose the positive or the negative strategy. Probably a mix. He will tout his business experience, and try to find some dirt to throw at us.

So a dirt repealing strategy has to be envisioned. It could be the truth seekers who could try to counter the blow, that is, try to sift through the attack, and tell things at they are.

Read more…

Living in the outskirts of The European Union, and having lived with the practical consequences of the schlerotic behemoth, some unwise politicians are trying to build, it is with a slight dissapointment and wonder I see the empirebuilders continue their flight against the ground.

What is The European Union really? To understand this, we have to look upon the historical development, the vanity of our leaders and the principle of democracy in distress.

First of all, the European union is a union forged with good intentions. It all started way back in France where humanist thinkers wanted to bring Europe to a status of peace and stability. In the usual french way; manipulation and secret plans, the European Union was build. It was to, through a secret plan, unite the wartorn continent.

Well here we are. The European Union is just on the brink of completion. The french strategy worked. It has now turned all the central European countries into a unity of some kind. It is difficult to define the political structure of the EU. In some ways it is a democracy. There is a parliament, a system of judges and so on. But the horrendous corruption of the system, I mean, it was made through the deceit of the European politicians, makes it absolutely unfit as a political entity. Usually a political entity is either made by the people, or by a bunch of back ally philosophers.

The citizens of Europe only accept the system because of either bribery or threats, and the tribes are suffering.

The rest of the world is moving towards a more sound system of ruling; the rule of law is strengtened in most countries, minority rights are more strong, religious freedom is improving. But in the European Union it all goes in the wrong direction; the people of Europe are the antagonists of the Eurocrats, the tools as islamization and theft of folkrights and freedoms are the tools of the bureaucratic czars of Bruxelles. There is absolutely no respect and trust between the citizens and the superstate projected by the elite.

The dream; to make a more peaceful world and a more peaceful Europe, has become a nightmare.

Read more…